Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2010
Автори: Sobolev, E., Vysotyuk, V.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут геофізики ім. С.I. Субботіна НАН України 2010
Назва видання:Геофизический журнал
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/103095
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation / E. Sobolev, V. Vysotyuk // Геофизический журнал. — 2010. — Т. 32, № 4. — С. 158-161. — Бібліогр.: 16 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-103095
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1030952016-06-14T03:04:11Z Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation Sobolev, E. Vysotyuk, V. 2010 Article Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation / E. Sobolev, V. Vysotyuk // Геофизический журнал. — 2010. — Т. 32, № 4. — С. 158-161. — Бібліогр.: 16 назв. — англ. 0203-3100 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/103095 en Геофизический журнал Інститут геофізики ім. С.I. Субботіна НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
format Article
author Sobolev, E.
Vysotyuk, V.
spellingShingle Sobolev, E.
Vysotyuk, V.
Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation
Геофизический журнал
author_facet Sobolev, E.
Vysotyuk, V.
author_sort Sobolev, E.
title Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation
title_short Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation
title_full Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation
title_fullStr Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation
title_full_unstemmed Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation
title_sort current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation
publisher Інститут геофізики ім. С.I. Субботіна НАН України
publishDate 2010
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/103095
citation_txt Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation / E. Sobolev, V. Vysotyuk // Геофизический журнал. — 2010. — Т. 32, № 4. — С. 158-161. — Бібліогр.: 16 назв. — англ.
series Геофизический журнал
work_keys_str_mv AT soboleve currentassessmentandaccountingofgeodynamicphenomenainengineeringgeologywithgeologicalandgeophysicalmethodsofinvestigation
AT vysotyukv currentassessmentandaccountingofgeodynamicphenomenainengineeringgeologywithgeologicalandgeophysicalmethodsofinvestigation
first_indexed 2025-07-07T13:17:01Z
last_indexed 2025-07-07T13:17:01Z
_version_ 1836994235716337664
fulltext ������� ��� ����� ���� ��4 ������������� �� !"# $ %& '( )�& �*�* Current assessment and accounting of geodynamic phenomena in engineering geology with geological and geophysical methods of investigation E. Sobolev, V. Vysotyuk, 2010 SSIE "Mars", Komsomolsk-Donetsk region, Ukraine mnvp_mars@ukr.net Despite the apparent inconsistency of the exis- ting theoretical views on many aspects of the tec- tonic processes in the lithosphere, no one no lon- ger doubt the assertion that the entire Earth's crust is divided into very difficult, though not devoid of certain laws, and a network of numerous razno- rangovyh poligeneticheskih faults. In addition, be- cause of the continuous mobility of the earth's crust, ����� � �� � �� ���� ������� ���� ��� ���� ����� ����� ���� ���� � ��� !� � " ������ �� ���� #� � " �$���� $�$� ��������� #� � " % �$��&������� �'����� (����� �� #�� " ����)������ �&*�� " ������������� ��+������$+� �����#�� " ,���� -���� ��� � $�������#�� " �� $�����%�������� #� " �� $��������� � ������� �$��� �. ������������� �� !"# $ %& '( )�& �*�* ��5 +,� �-.�,/�0 ��. ��� �1��, ��0. 0� 0���,� ��� ����� �� occurring primarily by the forces of cosmo-plane- tary origin, it constantly with a certain cyclic defor- mation occurs not only fragile, but also plastic [Ni- kolaev, 1988]. Thus, by discharging accumulated stresses due to rotational modes of the Earth, which is one of the main factors governing its equilibrium state [Tyapkin, 1998]. At the Earth's surface, these strains are usually manifested in the form of rela- tively narrow elongated linearly geomorphological forms, called the Geological lineament. This is es- pecially true of large deep-seated tectonic faults, which are usually well manifested in deciphering aerospace images. However, in engineering geology are often con- fronted with manifestations not only of major tec- tonic disturbances of global or regional scale, but also with the influence of a very common and ex- tensively ramified network of medium and small- scale violations of local, local values. Moreover, these violations are similar to large can be charac- terized as disjunctive and plicative kinds of defor- mations. As shown by careful analysis of large-scale topographic maps, they also are reflected in the present relief of the Earth in the form of elongated negative forms — the lineaments of a lower order. In the countryside, as a rule, such "micro" morpho- logically expressed bends channels of small rivers, streams, gullies, ravines, or just minor depressions, often barely noticeable visually. It should be noted that in terms of the impact of existing tectonic faults in stability and functioning of various engineering structures, in our opinion, is not that important to order, as their modern geody- namic activity. Moreover, fixed in geophysical fields geodynamical active zones on the Earth's surface can appear also outside the zones of influence of existing tectonic disturbances. Apparently, the main criterion here is not so much the presence of the already established structure of the impaired as a direct manifestation of the time of observation of abnormal mechanical stresses, concentrated in the surface layers crust. In other words — is a modern geodynamic effect on the investigated rock mass is confined to the space in the form of a linearly elon- gated narrow zones and temporary determinant of the cyclical nature of recent tectonic movements. One can not help noticing more and technogenic factors of critical stresses in the reclaimed man of the rock massif, an increasingly relevant in the study of geodynamic phenomena. One of the first on the existence of geodynami- cal active zones in the surface layers of the crust and the possibility of their successful study and mapping of attention Donetsk geologist collier YS Ryaboshtan in studies of structural features rock mass within the mine fields [Ryaboshtan, 1969]. He developed and successfully implemented in prac- tice of geological research reclaimed rock mass method of structural-geodynamic Mapping — SGKE [Gorbushina, Ryaboshtan, 1974, Ryaboshtan, 1975]. This method is based on the use of emana- tion (radon-toron) shooting, later found the widest application in solving many practical problems in mining, various branches of geology and seismolo- gy, even in the prediction of earthquakes. In subsequent years, the work of various depart- ments of the Institute of Geophysical DonNIGRI and UkrNTEC (Donetsk) method has been significantly upgraded through the introduction of new hardware development, methodological innovation and inte- grated approach to the study of the problem. As geodynamic processes are reflected also in the elec- tromagnetic field, when studying them more active- ly in addition to radiometric methods has begun to attract magnetometry and electrical [Sobolev, 2004]. That emerged a set of methods has been success- fully applied in studies of engineering and geody- namic conditions of various objects (underground mining, quarries, dumps, natural slopes, water- works, dams, residential buildings and prom- sooruzheniya, slopes of canals and pipelines, etc.). Continually refined over more than one decade set of ground geophysical methods has passed a reliable tested in the study of geodynamic situation in the different sites and in particular on industrial sites pumping stations "Snihurivka" and "Avgustov- ka" Odessa DIC (Figure). As a result, a specially made zaverochnogo drilling with core sampling and determination of physical and mechanical proper- ties of rocks, was found that within the identified geodynamic zones (GDZ) rock mass is characteri- zed by reduction of the strength, deformation and physical characteristics at 11—50 %. Level ground water is turned on 0,6—0,9 m above. Are also cha- racteristic of them was the presence of "perched", which is outside the zone was absent [Minutes …, 2000]. Thus justifying the concept of the geodynam- ic zone-block structure of an array of rock, which is already built, or only provides for the construction of engineering facilities for different purposes. ������� ��� ����� ���� �2* ������������� �� !"# $ %& '( )�& �*�* This concept as the basis of scientific and tech- nical activities SSIE "Mars" (Komsomolsk Donetsk region), which is currently follower of these ideas in the annex to decision many of today's practical prob- lems of Engineering Geology and Geo-ecology [Sobolev, Vysotyuk etc., 2007—2009]. Unfortunately, long recognized and accepted by many representatives of the scientific community views on the crucial role of the geodynamic factor in the occurrence of geological disasters (earthquakes, vol- canic eruptions, landslides, mudslides, flooding, sub- sidence earth's surface et al), hitherto rejected by se- nior officials. That will depend on their adoption of buil- ding regulations, requiring designers necessarily and properly due consideration to the zone-block struc- ture of reclaimed arrays. We believe this position is extremely irresponsible and totally inconsistent with today's challenges. As a result, those endless and often very tragic accident that occur in recent times more and more. In their series of Chernobyl [Strakhov et al., 1997], as well as the tragedy with passenger trains in the Urals [Divakov, 1998]. Their main reason for our firm belief is ignoring the importance of know-ledge of the geodynamic setting near exploited very responsible engineering structures. Recent advances in the study of geodynamic phenomena are pressing for an urgent review cur- rent building regulations. Necessary enter the ap- propriate additions and changes, requiring all par- ticipants in the construction and operation of criti- cal facilities to identify the location of geodynamic zones on reclaimed tracts of rocks with the obliga- tory Map construction engineering and geodynamic zoning and take into account the geodynamic effect on the stability and security operations engineering objects [Sobolev, Vysotyuk, 2007]. References Divakov V. I. Mikrogeodinamika. — Moscow: Russian University Peoples' Friendship, 1998. — 24 p. Gorbushina L. V., Ryaboshtan Y. S. Mapping of zones of contemporary movements with the help of radi- ometry // Izv. universities. ���.��� � �&���$��/�� ��0 �� �.�"�)123.�"���4.�"��.�54"51. Minutes of the Technical Meeting to review the work of OAO UkrNTEC and IGR of JSC "ITN" vol. In 2000, the NPS "Snihurivka" and NPS "Avgustovka" Odes- sa DIC. — Kiev, 2000. — 3 p. Nikolaev N. I. Contemporary tectonics and geodyna- mics of the lithosphere. — Moscow: Nedra, 1988. — 491 p. Ryaboshtan Y. S. From experience of application of emanation survey in the Donetsk pool. — Donetsk, PO Ukruglegeologiya, 1969. — 22 p. Ryaboshtan Y. S. Methodological manual on structural- geodynamic mapping emanation method (CFS—E). — Donetsk: PO Ukruglegeologiya, 1975. — 86 p. Sobolev E. G. Theory and practice magnetodynamic introscopy in solving engineering-geological and environmental problems (monograph). — Donetsk: Chestnut, 2004 — 264 p. Sobolev E. G., Vysotyuk V. A. Site Engineering geody- namic zoning be built ar��&!��� $&�������� � � � ����$��� *�$� �� ��� ����$� �� $���� ����������$� ��0 $ ������ ��������� � 66� 7� � �&� 7���� �������� ��$ ����&.�"�8���!�8� ,��$��*�9::2.�"���9.�"��.�54" 3:. Sobolev E. G., Vysotyuk V. A. Technological features geodinamichemskogo mapping of the surface lay- ers of the Earth by the method SSIE "Mars" // Proc. 6th NPC "Engineering protection of territories and objects in connection with the development of haz- ardous geological processes", 05—09.10.09, Cri- mea, Yalta. — SPC Ekologiya. Nauka. Technika. — 2009. — P. 35—37. Sobolev E. G., Vysotyuk V. A. The influence of geody- namic zoning—based successful monitoring of the coastal array of rocks // Proc 4th RPC "Monitoring of the environment: scientific and methodological, regulatory, technical, software", 21—25.09.09, Cri- mea, Koktebel. — SPC Ekologiya. Nauka. Technika. — 2009. — P. 12—13. Sobolev E. G., Vysotyuk V. A., Dolzhikov P. N. One geodynamic mechanism of the processes of flood- ing and landslides, soil (rock) arrays // Proc. 5th NPK Underflooding. 11—15.06.09, Berdyansk Za- porozhye region. — SPC Ekologiya. Nauka. Tech- nika. — 2007. — P. 22—24. ������������� �� !"# $ %& '( )�& �*�* �2� +,� �-.�,/�0 ��. ��� �1��, ��0. 0� 0���,� ��� ����� �� Sobolev E. G., Vysotyuk V. A., Voyevoda B. I., Zhivo- ra V. F., Schugorev V. A., Varvarovsky V. B., Klyuy- ko V. Ya. �������$�� ����$������$$��� � ���$�����0 �� ����% ��$����� � �� ��� ����� ���� � ���$�+�'�+ ;�������66�7� � �&�7���� ����������$� ����&.�"�8���! 8� ,��$��*�9::2.�"���5.�"��.�<4"<1. Strakhov V. N., Starostenko V. I., Kharitonov O. M., Apti- kaev F. F., Barkovsky E. W., Kedrov O. K., Kend- zera A.W., Kopnichev Yu. F., Omelchenko W. D., Palienko W. P. Seismic phenomena in the vicinity of Chernobyl // Geophys. J. — 1997. — 19*���5.�" �.�5")<. Tyapkin K. F. Physics of the Earth. — Kiev: Vishcha Shk., 1998. — 312 p. Vysotyuk V. A., Sobolev E. G. Geodynamic factor and its role in the formation of landslides in the hillside areas of terrain // Proc. 5th NPK impact of devastat- ing floods, floods, dangerous geological proces- ses on the functioning of utilities and life safety, 23—27.02.09, Yaremche Ivano-Frankivsk region. — SPC Ekologiya. Nauka.Te=hnika. — 2009. — P. 92— 93. Vysotyuk V. A., Sobolev E. G. On improving methods to predict emergencies caused by geodynamic pro- cesses // Proc. Intern. NPK "Problems of Forecast- ing and prevention of natural disasters, natural and man-made and man-made origin, 05—09.10.09, Crimea, Yalta. — SPC Ekologiya. Nauka. Te=hnika. — 2009. — P. 62—64.