General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering

The model for the currents of interactions of higher spin fermions with the 0- and 1/2-spin particles is proposed. These currents obey to the theorem on currents and fields as well as the theorems on current asymptotics. The comparison of the proposed model with partial wave analysis of the πN–scatt...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2012
Автори: Kulish, Yu.V., Rybachuk, E.V.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Ukrainian State Academy of Railway Transport 2012
Назва видання:Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/106975
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering / Yu.V. Kulish, E.V. Rybachuk // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 27-31. — Бібліогр.: 17 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-106975
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1069752016-10-11T03:02:11Z General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering Kulish, Yu.V. Rybachuk, E.V. Section A. Quantum Field Theory The model for the currents of interactions of higher spin fermions with the 0- and 1/2-spin particles is proposed. These currents obey to the theorem on currents and fields as well as the theorems on current asymptotics. The comparison of the proposed model with partial wave analysis of the πN–scattering in Δ(1232)-region shows the validity of the theorem on currents and fields. It is shown that in consequence of the theorems on current asymptotics the contributions of higher spin nucleon resonances to πN–scattering amplitudes must decrease at high energy at least as s⁻⁶. Предложена модель для токов взаимодействий высокоспиновых фермионов с частицами, обладающими спином 0 и 1/2. Эти токи удовлетворяют теореме о токах и полях и теореме об асимптотике токов. Сравнение предложенной модели с парциально волновыми анализами πN–рассеяния в области Δ(1232) показывает справедливость теоремы о токах и полях. Показано, что вследствие теоремы об асимптотике токов вклады высокоспиновых нуклонных резонансов в амплитуды πN–рассеяния должны убывать при высоких энергиях по крайней мере как s⁻⁶. Запропоновано модель для струмів взаємодій високоспінових ферміонів з частинками, які мають спін 0 та 1/2. Ці струми задовольняють теоремі про струми та поля та теоремі про асимптотику струмів. Порівняння запропонованої моделі з парціально хвильовими аналізами πN–розсіювання в області Δ(1232) показує справедливість теореми про струми і поля. Показано, що внаслідок теореми про асимптотику струмів внески високоспінових нуклонних резонансів в амплітуди πN–розсіювання повинні спадати при високих енергіях по меншій мірі як s⁻⁶. 2012 Article General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering / Yu.V. Kulish, E.V. Rybachuk // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 27-31. — Бібліогр.: 17 назв. — англ. 1562-6016 PACS: 02.30 Jr, 03.65. Pm, 11.10. J, 11.10 L, 11.10 Q, 11.40 D, 11.80 E, 13.75 G, 14.20 G. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/106975 en Вопросы атомной науки и техники Ukrainian State Academy of Railway Transport
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic Section A. Quantum Field Theory
Section A. Quantum Field Theory
spellingShingle Section A. Quantum Field Theory
Section A. Quantum Field Theory
Kulish, Yu.V.
Rybachuk, E.V.
General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description The model for the currents of interactions of higher spin fermions with the 0- and 1/2-spin particles is proposed. These currents obey to the theorem on currents and fields as well as the theorems on current asymptotics. The comparison of the proposed model with partial wave analysis of the πN–scattering in Δ(1232)-region shows the validity of the theorem on currents and fields. It is shown that in consequence of the theorems on current asymptotics the contributions of higher spin nucleon resonances to πN–scattering amplitudes must decrease at high energy at least as s⁻⁶.
format Article
author Kulish, Yu.V.
Rybachuk, E.V.
author_facet Kulish, Yu.V.
Rybachuk, E.V.
author_sort Kulish, Yu.V.
title General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering
title_short General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering
title_full General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering
title_fullStr General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering
title_full_unstemmed General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering
title_sort general properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πn–scattering
publisher Ukrainian State Academy of Railway Transport
publishDate 2012
topic_facet Section A. Quantum Field Theory
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/106975
citation_txt General properties of interaction currents of higher spin fermions and their consequences for πN–scattering / Yu.V. Kulish, E.V. Rybachuk // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 27-31. — Бібліогр.: 17 назв. — англ.
series Вопросы атомной науки и техники
work_keys_str_mv AT kulishyuv generalpropertiesofinteractioncurrentsofhigherspinfermionsandtheirconsequencesforpnscattering
AT rybachukev generalpropertiesofinteractioncurrentsofhigherspinfermionsandtheirconsequencesforpnscattering
first_indexed 2025-07-07T19:16:32Z
last_indexed 2025-07-07T19:16:32Z
_version_ 1837016854372024320
fulltext GENERAL PROPERTIES OF INTERACTION CURRENTS OF HIGHER SPIN FERMIONS AND THEIR CONSEQUENCES FOR πN-SCATTERING Yu.V. Kulish and E.V. Rybachuk ∗ Ukrainian State academy of Railway Transport, 61050, Kharkov, Ukraine (Received October 26, 2011) The model for the currents of interactions of higher spin fermions with the 0- and 1/2-spin particles is proposed. These currents obey to the theorem on currents and fields as well as the theorems on current asymptotics. The comparison of the proposed model with partial wave analysis of the πN-scattering in Δ(1232)-region shows the validity of the theorem on currents and fields. It is shown that in consequence of the theorems on current asymptotics the contributions of higher spin nucleon resonances to πN-scattering amplitudes must decrease at high energy at least as s−6. PACS: 02.30 Jr, 03.65. Pm, 11.10. J, 11.10 L, 11.10 Q, 11.40 D, 11.80 E, 13.75 G, 14.20 G. 1. INTRODUCTION At present a lot of higher spin particles (the spin J ≥ 1) is known. It is known that the higher spin par- ticles as well as the nucleons, the pions and nuclei are not the elementary particles. But the approximation of elementary particles gives rather good description of reactions at low and intermediate energies. There- fore we can assume that the higher spin particles may be considered approximately as elementary particles also, similarly to the nuclei and the pions. The non- elementarity of the particles can be taken into ac- count by means of the form factors in the interaction currents. As a rule the Rarita-Schwinger formalism [1, 2] for the higher spin particles is used in the cal- culations of the reaction amplitudes. We can write for the amplitude of any interaction of higher spin fermion (HSF) V = U(p)μ1...μrη(p)μ1...μl , (1) where η(p)μ1...μl is the HSF interaction current. The U(p)μ1...μl = U(p)l μ is the spin-tensor of HSF with the spin J = l + 1/2 and the momentum p. This spin-tensor is symmetric and traceless and its convo- lutions with momenta p and γ-matrices vanish. As usual we assume that the HSF interactions are de- scribed by the system of the non-homogeneous Dirac equations. The field spin-tensors U(p)l μ and U(x)l μ have got 2J + 1 = 2l + 2 independent components. As a rule for the current spin-tensors η(p)μ1...μl and η(x)μ1...μl it is assumed that they are the symmet- ric only. Therefore they have got Nl = 4 · 4 · 5 · ... · (l + 3)!/l! = 2(l + 1)(l + 2)(l + 3)/3 indepen- dent components. We name the approaches with such currents as the common (or conventional) ones. Un- fortunately the common approaches have got some shortcomings [3]: 1) the inconsistences of equation systems (as Nl > 2J + 1); 2) power divergences due to the higher spin particle propagators and the in- teraction currents; 3) the ambiguities of the vertex functions; 4) contradictions to the experimental data in wide energy regions. Therefore we conclude that the common approaches must be modified. As the shortcomings of common approaches exist for differ- ent higher spin particles we may propose that the in- teraction currents for higher spin particles must obey some general properties in addition to the symmetry property. In Refs. [3-6] it is shown that the interac- tion currents for higher spin particles must obey the theorem on currents and fields as well as the theorem on current asymptotics. In Refs. [7, 8] the model for the interaction of higher spin boson with two spin- less particles is proposed in the agreement with these theorems. The calculation of the virtual higher spin boson contributions to the self-energy operator of the spinless particle shows that these contributions are fi- nite in the one-loop approximation [3]. These finite values must be compared with the logarithmic diver- gences for two spinless particle contribution to the self-energy operator. In present paper we propose the model for the vertex of the HSF interaction with 0- and 1/2-spin particles (e.g., πN ↔ N∗ ), which obeys the theorem on currents and fields as well as the theorem on cur- rent asymptotics. We study the application of this model to the elastic πN -scattering. 2. CONSEQUENCES OF THEOREM ON CURRENTS AND FIELDS In accordance with the theorem on currents and fields [6] the system of the algebraic equations for ∗Corresponding author E-mail address: rybachuk l@mail.ru PROBLEMS OF ATOMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, N 1. Series: Nuclear Physics Investigations (57), p. 27-31. 27 the Fourier components is consistent only in the case when the current spin-tensors have got the same properties as the field spin-tensors. We name the cur- rent which obey the theorem on currents and fields as the physical ones and denote j(p)l μ = j(p)μ1...μl . Thus for physical currents we have j(p)μ1 ...μl pμi = 0, ∂μij(x)μ1 ...μl = 0, (2) j(p)μ1 ...μl gμiμk = 0, j(x)μ1 ...μl gμiμk = 0, (3) j(p)μ1 ...μl γμi = 0, γμij(x)μ1 ...μl = 0, (4) momentum coordinate representation representation where i, k = 1, 2, ..., l. The physical currents have got 2J + 1 independent components and can be derived using the projection operator Π(p)μ1...μl,ν1,...νl = Π(p)l μ,ν [9], modified in Refs. [6, 10]: j(p)l μ = (p2)lΠ(p)l μ,νη(p)l μ. (5) As example, for J = 3/2 we derive P (p)μν = p̂ + M p2 −M2 [ dμν − 1 3 γ̃μγ̃ν ] = = [ dμν − 1 3 γ̃μγ̃ν ] p̂ + M p2 −M2 , γ̃μ = γ5(γμ − pμp̂/p2), dμν = −gμν + pμpν/M2. (6) This propagator differs from usual propagator for J = 3/2 [2, 11,12]. We can see several distinctions of the HSF propa- gators in our and common approaches: 1) In our ap- proach the convolutions of the HSF propagator with the p momentum, the γ-matrices, and the metric ten- sors vanish at any p and J , but in common ap- proaches they vanish only at p̂ = M (i. e. on the mass shell); 2) In our approach the operators p̂ + M and Π(p)l μν commute; 3) As a consequence of the current conservation (2) and the condition (4) the power divergences due to the HSF propagator dis- appear in our approach; 4) The scale dimension of our HSF propagators equals −1 for any J , whereas in common approach it equals 2J − 2. This allows to eliminate the one source of the power divergences existing in common approaches. 3. CONSISTENT MODEL FOR INTERACTION CURRENTS OF HIGHER SPIN FERMIONS We consider the simplest HSF interactions deter- mined by one amplitude. Using the definition(5) we may write for the J(p)→ O(q2) +1/2(p2) transition: j(p, q)μ1...μl = glFl(p, q)(p2)lϕ+(q2)u(p2)· · { 1 iγ5 } Π(p)μ1...μl,ν1...νl q ′ ν1 ...q ′ νl , (7) where q ′ = q2 − p2, gl is the coupling constant; Fl(p, q ′ ) is the form factor providing the necessary asymptotic decrease in agreement with the theorem on current asymtotics. In particular for J = 3/2 we have j(p, q) ′ μ = g1F1(p, q)ϕ+(q2)u(p2) ·[ −Q ′ μ + 1 3 γ5γ̃μQ̂ ′ ]{ 1 iγ5 } , (8) where Q ′ μ = −dμνp2q ′ ν = p2q ′ μ − pμ(pq′), (pQ′) = 0. The 1 and iγ5 matrices in the currents (7), (8) corre- spond to different sets of the particle parities. Note that different common currents lead to the physical currents (5) with the same momentum dependencies, as the convolutions of the projection operators with the p momentum and the γ-matrixes vanish in our ap- proach. Therefore the physical currents correspond- ing to different common currents in Eq. (5) differ by the coupling constant only. Thus the ambiguities of vertex functions do not appear in our approach. 4. TEST OF THEOREM ON CURRENTS AND FIELDS IN Δ(1232)-REGION HSF in the 0 + 1/2 →← J(p) -transitions can be N∗(J) resonances in the s-channel of the elastic πN -scattering (πN → N∗(J) → πN). In elas- tic πN -scattering the S31(W )−, P31(W )−, P33(W )- amplitudes correspond to isospin I = 3/2 and the to- tal angular momentum JπN = 1/2, 1/2, 3/2 , respec- tively (where W is the total energy in the c. m. s.). The Δ(1232) on the mass shell (at W = MΔ, where MΔ is the Δ(1232) mass) contributes to the ampli- tude P33 only. But at W �= MΔ the Δ(1232) con- tribute to other amplitudes of the πN -scattering too. These contribution are different in our and common approaches. In common approach Δ(1232) contribute to the amplitudes S31, P31, P33, and D33 at W �= MΔ. We denote the possible contributions of Δ(1232) to these amplitudes as SΔ 31, PΔ 31, PΔ 33, and DΔ 33, respectively. To derive these contributions in common approach we use common propagator of the 3/2-spin particle [2] and the Breit-Wigner formula [13]. The calcula- tions of the SΔ 31−, PΔ 31−, DΔ 33-amplitudes show that among these amplitudes SΔ 31 achieves largest values and DΔ 33 have smallest values for MΔ − Γ/2 ≤ W ≤ MΔ + Γ/2 (where Γ = 112 MeV is the total with of Δ(1232) [13]). In common approach energy depen- dences are fairly sharp for S31(W ). In our approach SΔ 31 = PΔ 31 = 0 , as consequence of (2), (4). From comparison with the partial wave analysis [13, 14] we may conclude that SΔ 31 = 0 in agreement with the consequence of the theorem on current and fields. 5. CONSEQUENCES OF THEOREMS ON CURRENT ASYMPTOTICS We consider HSF which moves along the z-axis (i.e., p = (p0, 0, 0, p3) ). Then the physical currents in mo- mentum representation j(p)l μ depend on p0 and p3, whereas j(x)l μ depend on x0 and x3. As the compo- nents of j(p)l μ are the Fourier components of j(x)l μ 28 these currents in coordinate representation are the improper integrals depending on the parameters x0 and x3. In Ref [6] it is shown, that the physical currents j (x)l μ and some their derivatives must be continuous functions. We use the Weierstrass test to study the continuity of the currents. Therefore, we consider the integrals +∞∫ −∞ dp0 +∞∫ −∞ dp3 ∣∣∣j (p)l μ ∣∣∣ |p0|m 0 |p3|m 3 , (9) where m0, m3, m(j) are integer non-negative num- bers (m0 + m3 = 0, 1, 2, ..., m(j)). The theorem on current asymptotics may be formulated as: If the currents J(x)l μ and their partial deriva- tives of upper degree m(j) are continuous functions then their Fourier components j(p)l μ must decrease at |pν | → ∞ to provide the convergence of all integrals (9). Note that the integrals (9) must be convergent in all kinematic regions. The powers of the decrease for j(p)l μ are determined by the number m(j) . In Ref. [6] it is derived that m(j) = 2 , as consequence of the condition that 2J + 1 equations must be for U(x)l μ. Now in addition we demand that the double Fourier transformations for the function of two variables con- verges to the value of this function in any space-time point. But it is possible if this function, first deriva- tive and its mixed derivative of the second degree are continuous [15]. It allows to derive m(j) = 4. We propose that the form factors Fl(p, q) in the currents (7) have a form: F̃l(p, q) = (pq)2n1 [ (p2 −M2)2n2 + a4n2 ]−1 [ (pq)2n3 + b4n3 ]−1 , (10) where n1, n2, n3 are integer non-negative numbers, a and b are positive constants. Using the method of Refs. [7, 8] we derive at n1 = 1: n2 ≥ m1(η)/4 + 1, n3 ≥ m1(η)/2 + 2, where even number m1(η) = m(j) + 2l for even m(j) and m1(η) = m(j) + 2l + 1 for odd m(j). For m(j) = 4 we have the restrictions n2 ≥ l/2 + 2, n3 ≥ l + 4 Now we consider the convergence of the integrals (9) for the contributions of N∗(J) to s-channel am- plitudes of the πN -scattering. In c. m. s. we have p = (W, 0, 0, 0) , p2 = W 2 = s, p · q′ = m2 π −m2 N q ′ = (q0 − E, 2�q2) , where q0, E, and �q2 are the pion energy, the nucleon energy, and the 3-momentum of the final pion, respectively. The form factor (10) may be written as F (p, q′) = A/ ( W 4n2 + a4n2 ) , where A is the constant. The asymptotic behavior of the cur- rent (7) is given by j(p)l μ ∼ CjW 3lFl(p, q′), where Cj is some constant. The p3-dependence of the current (7) in c. m. s. is determinated by the factor δ(p3). Then the inte- grals (9) converge in the case of the convergence of the integral ∞∫ 0 W 3l+4dW W 4n2 + a4n2 . (11) This integral converges at n2 ≥ 3/4 · l+3/2. Thus we derive two restrictions. For better convergence of the integrals we must choose larger n2. Both restrictions give the same values of the number n2 : n2 ≥ 3, 3, 4 for J = 3/2, 5/2, 7/2, respectively. At l ≥ 4 sec- ond restriction gives larger integer number n2. It is of interest to study the asymptotic behaviour of the N∗(J) contributions to the πN -scattering amplitudes including the physical currents (7) with the form fac- tors (10) T(πN → N∗(J)→ πN) = = Al ū2(p̂±M)u1 W 2 −M2 + iMΓ [ W 3l W 4n2 + a4n2 ]2 , (12) where Al are the constants. In general we derive that the asymptotic contributions of N∗(J) to in- variant amplitudes decrease at least as s−6. But we can derive stronger decrease at integer n2. Indeed, for J = 3/2, 5/2, 7/2 we have n2 = 3, 3, 4 and T (πN → N∗(J)→ πN)/Ãl ≤ s−9, s−6, s−7 respec- tively. 6. EQUATIONS FOR GENERATIONS OF HIGHER SPIN FERMIONS In Ref.[16] it is shown that the integrals correspond- ing to the Green functions of the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations diverge. To derive the convergent integrals for the Green functions we may study the partial differential equations of higher degrees. We consider some sets (kinds, families, dynasties) of par- ticles, which have different masses but the same val- ues of the electric charge, the spin, and the pari- ties. The members of such kinds belong to gener- ations. We can consider the electron kind (e1 = e, e2 = μ, e3 = τ, . . .), the neutrino kind (ν1 = νe, ν2 = νμ, ν3 = ντ , . . .), three colored up-quark kinds (u1 = u, u2 = c, u3 = t, . . .) and three colored down- quark kinds (d1 = d, d2 = s, d3 = b, . . .). We propose the equations for the 1/2-spin particles as the gener- alization of Dirac equation:( M1 − i∂̂ ) ( M2 − i∂̂ ) ... ( MN − i∂̂ ) = χ (x) , (13) where M1, M2, ..., MN are the particle masses (M1 < M2 < M3 < ... < MN ). The number N is the degree of the differential equation, which is equal to the number of the generations in the kind. It fol- lows from the convergence of the integrals for the Green function of Eq. (13) that N ≥ 5. We de- note the minimal N for the elementary fermions (the leptons and the quarks) as Nf . The num- bers of the generations for composite particles are larger then ones for elementary particles. For ex- ample, the minimal numbers for the proton and the neutron kinds are equal to 75, as we may de- rive N(proton kind)min = N(neutron kind)min = N2 f (Nf + 1)/2 [16]. The proton kind includes p, ∑ +(1189), Λ+ c (2285) [17]. The neutron kind in- cludes n, Λ0(1115), ∑ 0(1193), Ξ0(1315). 29 We propose that the generalization of the equa- tion system for the HSF generations may be written as (−�)lΠ(x)μ1...μl,ν1...νl (−i∂̂ + M1)(−i∂̂ + M2) · · · · · · (−i∂̂ + MN )U(x)ν1...νl = j̃(x)μ1...μl , (14) where the physical currents j(x)μ1...μl must obey the conditions (2)-(4). We may rewrite Eq. (14) in the form : (−�)lΠ(x)μ1...μl,ν1...νl (� + M2 1 )(� + M2 2 ) · · · · · · (� + M2 N)U(x)ν1...νl = = (−i∂̂ + M1)(−i∂̂ + M2) · · · · · · (−i∂̂ + MN )j̃(x)μ1...μl . (15) We see that the physical currents j̃ (x)μ1...μl must have the continuous derivatives of the degree N + 3, (i. e. , m(j̃) = N + 3). Then for the number n2 in the form factor (10) we derive n2 ≥ (2l + N + 7)/4. For these n2 we have T (πN → N∗(J)→ πN) ≤ Ãl/sN+7−l, (16) where Ãl is constant. We may find Nmin for Δ-isobar kinds. We assume that the Δ++- kind includes Δ++(1232) and different three-quark systems with Jp = 3/2+ consist of u−, c−, t-quarks . The Δ−-kind includes Δ−(1232), ∑− δ (1385), Ξ− δ (1531), Ω−(1672) and dif- ferent three-quark systems with Jp = 3/2+ consist of d−, s−, b-quarks. We may derive that N(Δ++ − kind)min = N(Δ− − kind)min = Nf (Nf + 1)(Nf + 2)/6 ≥ 35. We may expect that N(Δ+ − kind)min = N(Δ0 − kind)min = N(proton kind)min = N(neutron kind)min ≥ 75. From Eq. (16) we can derive T(πp→ Δ++ → π+p) ≤ Ãl/s41. 7. CONCLUSIONS We proposed the model for the currents of HSF in- teractions with the 0- and 1/2-spin particles. These physical currents obey the general properties formu- lated in Ref. [6] for the currents of the HSF interac- tions. All physical currents must obey the theorem on currents and fields as well as the theorem on current asymptotics. We consider the nucleon resonances N∗(J) as example of HSF. In consequence of the theo- rem on currents and fields the virtual HSF can change the parity but they do not contribute to the ampli- tudes corresponding to the values of the angular mo- mentum less than J , whereas in common approaches such contributions exist. We have tested the predic- tions of our and common approaches for the virtual Δ(1232) in the elastic πN -scattering. The calcula- tions performed in common isobar model show sharp energy dependence of the Δ(1232)-contributions to the S31- and P31−amplitudes at W ≈ MΔ. It turned out that the S31−amplitude is the most sen- sitive. According to the partial wave analyses the energy dependences of the amplitudes are approxi- mately linear in the Δ(1232) region, i. e., they dif- fer from the predictions of common isobar model. It means that the predictions of our approach are valid. Thus we have examined the validity of the condi- tions (2), (4).To examine the validity of the condi- tions (2)-(4) we must consider HSF with J > 3/2. For example, it is of interest to study the contri- butions of F15(1680) [17] to the S11−, P11−, P13−, D13−, F15− amplitudes; F35(1905) to the S31−, P31−,P33−,D33−,F35-amplitudes; F37(1950) to the S31−,P31−, P33−, D35−, F35-amplitudes. We propose the form-factor (10), which allows to obey the theorem on current asymptotics. The re- strictions for the integer number n2 lead to the high- energy decrease of the HSF contributions to the πN - scattering amplitudes. This decrease explains the ab- sence of the N∗(J) contributions at high energies. In the cases for the interactions of several higher spin particles (e. g., the ρΔN∗(J)-interaction) the theorems on currents and fields as well as the the- orem on current asymptotics must be valid for the interaction currents of each higher spin particle. The theorem on current and fields can be satisfied using the projection operators. The theorem on current asymptotics can be satisfied by consideration of the product of the form factors (such as (10) or from Refs. [7,8]) for each higher spin particle. Therefore we may expect that the contributions of the vertex functions for several higher spin particle interaction to the amplitudes ought to decrease at high energies, in comparison with similar vertex functions for the 0- and 1/2-spin particle interactions. References 1. S. Weinberg. Feynman rules for any spin // Phys. Rev. 1964, v. 33B, N 5, p. 1318-1332. 2. Yu.V. Novozhilov. Introduction to elementary particle theory. Moscow: “Nauka”, 1969, 465 p. (in Russian). 3. Yu.V. Kulish, E.V. Rybachuk. Elimination of power divergences in consistent model for spinless and high-spin particle interaction // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. 2007, iss. 3(1), p. 137-141. 4. Yu.V. Kulish, E.V. Rybachuk. Properties of high-spin boson interaction currents and elimina- tion of power divergences // Problems of Atomic Science and Technology. 2001, iss. 6(1), p. 84-87. 5. Yu.V. Kulish, E.V. Rybachuk. Properties of high-spin boson interactions // Journal of Kharkiv National University. 2003, v. 585, iss. 1 (21), p. 49-55 (in Ukrainian). 6. Yu.V. Kulish, E.V. Rybachuk. Properties of high-spin fermion interaction // Journal of Kharkiv National University. 2004, v. 619, iss. 1 (23), p. 49-57 (in Ukrainian). 30 7. E.V. Rybachuk. Consistent model for interac- tion of high-spin boson and two spinless par- ticles. I. Tensor structure of currents // Jour- nal of Kharkiv National University. 2006, v. 744, iss. 3 (31), p. 75-82 (in Russian). 8. E.V. Rybachuk. Consistent model for interac- tion of high-spin boson and two spinless par- ticles. II. Asymptotics of currents // Journal of Kharkiv National University. 2006, v. 746, iss. 4 (32), p. 65-74 (in Russian). 9. V. De Alfaro, S. Fubini, G. Furlant, C. Rosse- ti. Currents in hadron physics. Amsterdam, London: “North-Holland Comp.”, New York: “American Elsevien Publ. Comp.” 1973; Moscow: ”Mir”, 1976, 670 p. (in Russian). 10. Yu.V. Kulish. Model for particle interaction without power divergences and polarization phe- nomena // Yad. Fis. 1989, v. 50, p. 1697-1704 (in Russian). 11. S. Gasiorovich. Elementary particle physics. New-York-London-Sydney: “John Wiley and Sons”. Inc., 1967; Moscow: “Nauka”, 1969, 744 p. (in Russian). 12. A.I. Akhiezer, M.P. Rekalo. Electrodynamics of hadrons. Kiev: “Naukova dumka”, 1977, 496 p. (in Russian). 13. Y.R. Koch, E. Peitarinen. Low energy πN par- tial wave analysis // Nucl. Phys. 1980, v. A336, p. 331-346. 14. R.A. Arndt, J.M. Ford, L.D. Roper. Pion-nucle- on wave analysis to 1100 MeV // Phys. Rev. 1985, v. D32, p. 1085-1103. 15. G.M. Fikhtengolts. Course of differential and in- tegral calculus. Moscow: “Nauka”, 1966, v. 3, 656 p. (in Russian). 16. Yu.V. Kulish, E.V. Rybachuk. Divergences of in- tegrals for Green functions of Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations and necessary existence of par- ticle generations // Journal of Kharkiv National University. 2011, v. 955, iss. 2 (50), p. 4-14. 17. Particle Data Group. Review of particle physics // Phys. Lett. 2008, v. 667, p. 1-1340. ����� ����� � ���� �� � ����� ��� �������������� ��� ����� � �� ����� ��� ��� πN�� ������� ���� ����� ��� �� ���� ��������� ����� ��� ���� �� � ����� ��� �������������� ��� ����� � � � �� �� ��� � ���� � ����� � � 1/2 ! � ��� "����� ����� ���� � � �� � � ����� � ���� � �� �� � � ��� ���� #� ������ ������������ ����� � � ��� ���� ������� � � ��� � πN �� ������� � ��� � � Δ(1232) ��� ��� � ��� �������� � ���� � � �� � � ����� ��� � ��� � � ������ ��� ���� � �� �� � � �� �� ���� ��� �� �������������� �"������� ����� ���� � ��� "�� πN �� ������� ������ "��� � ��� ������� $���%��� �� �� ���� ��� � � s−6 � � ���� �� � ���� � � �� �� �� � ���� �������������� ��� ����� � ���� � ������ ��� πN�������� ��� ���� ����� ���� �� ���� & �������� �� ����� ��� � �" '� �� ( ��'� ��������'����� ��� '��'� � � � ��� �� ��' � � ��'� � 1/2 )' � �" � � ��������� � ���� ' ��� � �" � ���� ���� ' ��� �� � � ��" � �"� '� ���'������ � �������� ��* ����' � � ��' ���� �������� � � �'� � πN �����'�� ��� � ��� � ' Δ(1232) ��� �"( ��� ������'� � ���� � ��� � �" � ' ���� ��� � ��� �� �� ��'��� ���� � ��� �� �� � ��" � �" '� ������ ��������'����� �"������� ����� ��'� � ��' "�� πN �����'�� ��� ������' �� � � � ��� ������� ����%'�� �� ��+'� '�' �� s−6 ,-