On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin

Unified field theoretical models based on generalized affine geometries are proposed, described and analyzed from the physical and mathematical points of view. The relation between torsion and spin of the models is explicitly shown and some of their physical consequences, as the modification of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2012
1. Verfasser: Cirilo-Lombardo, Diego Julio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: International Institute of Physics, Capim Macio, Brazil 2012
Schriftenreihe:Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/107013
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin / Diego Julio Cirilo-Lombardo // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 139-142. — Бібліогр.: 5 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-107013
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1070132016-10-12T03:02:13Z On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin Cirilo-Lombardo, Diego Julio Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology Unified field theoretical models based on generalized affine geometries are proposed, described and analyzed from the physical and mathematical points of view. The relation between torsion and spin of the models is explicitly shown and some of their physical consequences, as the modification of the anomalous momentum of the elementary particles, are discussed. Модели единой теории поля, основанные на обобщенных аффинных геометриях, предложены, описаны и проанализированы с физико-математической точки зрения. Явно показана связь между кручением и спином в этих моделях. Обсуждаются некоторые их физические следствия, например, модификация аномального импульса элементарных частиц. Моделі єдиної теорії поля, засновані на узагальнених афінних геометріях, запропоновані, описані й проаналізовані з фізико-математичної точки зору. Явно показаний зв'язок між крутінням і спином у цих моделях. Обговорюються деякі їхні фізичні наслідки, наприклад, модифікація аномального імпульсу елементарних часток. 2012 Article On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin / Diego Julio Cirilo-Lombardo // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 139-142. — Бібліогр.: 5 назв. — англ. 1562-6016 PACS: 03.65.Pm, 03.65.Ge, 61.80.Mk http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/107013 en Вопросы атомной науки и техники International Institute of Physics, Capim Macio, Brazil
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology
Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology
spellingShingle Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology
Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology
Cirilo-Lombardo, Diego Julio
On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
description Unified field theoretical models based on generalized affine geometries are proposed, described and analyzed from the physical and mathematical points of view. The relation between torsion and spin of the models is explicitly shown and some of their physical consequences, as the modification of the anomalous momentum of the elementary particles, are discussed.
format Article
author Cirilo-Lombardo, Diego Julio
author_facet Cirilo-Lombardo, Diego Julio
author_sort Cirilo-Lombardo, Diego Julio
title On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin
title_short On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin
title_full On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin
title_fullStr On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin
title_full_unstemmed On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin
title_sort on unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin
publisher International Institute of Physics, Capim Macio, Brazil
publishDate 2012
topic_facet Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/107013
citation_txt On unified theoretical models, dynamical torsion and spin / Diego Julio Cirilo-Lombardo // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 139-142. — Бібліогр.: 5 назв. — англ.
series Вопросы атомной науки и техники
work_keys_str_mv AT cirilolombardodiegojulio onunifiedtheoreticalmodelsdynamicaltorsionandspin
first_indexed 2025-07-07T19:22:47Z
last_indexed 2025-07-07T19:22:47Z
_version_ 1837017251502358528
fulltext Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology ON UNIFIED THEORETICAL MODELS, DYNAMICAL TORSION AND SPIN Diego Julio Cirilo-Lombardo 1,2∗ 1International Institute of Physics, Capim Macio, 59078-400, Natal-RN, Brazil 2Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980, Dubna, Russia (Received October 13, 2011) Unified field theoretical models based on generalized affine geometries are proposed, described and analyzed from the physical and mathematical points of view. The relation between torsion and spin of the models is explicitly shown and some of their physical consequences, as the modification of the anomalous momentum of the elementary particles, are discussed. PACS: 03.65.Pm, 03.65.Ge, 61.80.Mk 1. THE THEORY In this report the geometrical analysis of a new type of Unified Field Theoretical (UFT) models intro- duced previously in [1, 2] by the authors is presented. These new unified theoretical models are character- ized by an underlying hypercomplex structure, zero non-metricity and the geometrical action is deter- mined fundamentally by the curvature arising thanks to the breaking of symmetry of a group manifold in higher dimensions. This mechanism of Cartan- MacDowell-Mansouri type, permits us to construct geometrical actions of determinantal type. Such mechanism also leads to a non topological physical Lagrangian due to the splitting of a reductive geom- etry. The starting point of the type of theory is a space-time basis Manifold equipped with a metric, e.g. M, gμν ≡ eμ · eν , (1) where for each point p ∈ M ∃ a local space affine A. The connection over A Γ̃ defines a generalized affine connection Γ on M specified by (∇, K) where K is an invertible (1, 1) tensor over M . We will demand that the connection is compatible and rectilinear ∇K = KT, ∇g = 0, (2) where T is the torsion, and g (the space-time met- ric used to raise and to low indices and determines the geodesics) is preserved under parallel transport. This generalized compatibility condition ensures that the affine generalized connection Γ maps autoparal- lels of Γ on M in straight lines over the affine space A (locally). The first equation in (2) is equal to the condition determining the connection in terms of the fundamental field in the UFT non-symmetric. For in- stance, K can be identified with the fundamental ten- sor in the non-symmetric fundamental theory. This fact gives us the possibility to restrict the connection to an (anti) Hermitian theory. The second important point is the following: let us consider [1] the extended curvature Rab μν = Rab μν + Σab μν (3) with Rab μν = ∂μωab ν − ∂νωab μ + ωac μ ω b νc − ωac ν ω b μc , (4) Σab μν = − (ea μeb ν − ea νeb μ ) . We assume here ωab ν a SO (d − 1, 1) connection and ea μ is a vierbein field. The eqs. (3) and (4) can be ob- tained, for example, using the formulation that was pioneering introduced in seminal works by E. Cartan long time ago [1]. It is well known that in such a formalism the gravitational field is represented as a connection of one form associated with some group which contains the Lorentz group as subgroup. The typical example is provided by the SO (d, 1) de Sit- ter gauge theory of gravity. In this specific case, the SO (d, 1) the gravitational gauge field ωAB μ = −ωBA μ is broken into the SO (d − 1, 1) connection ωab μ and the ωda μ = ea μ vierbein field, with the dimension d fixed. Then, the de Sitter (anti-de Sitter) curvature RAB μν = ∂μωAB ν − ∂νωAB μ + ωAC μ ω B νC −ωAC ν ω B μC (5) splits in the curvature (3). At this point, our goal is to enlarge the group structure of the space-time Manifold of such manner that the curvature (5), ob- viously after the breaking of symmetry, permits us to ∗E-mail address: diego@theor.jinr.ru PROBLEMS OF ATOMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, N 1. Series: Nuclear Physics Investigations (57), p. 139-142. 139 define the geometrical Lagrangian of the theory as Lg = √ detRa μRaν = √ detGμν . (6) Then the action is S = b2 4π ∫ √−gdx4 R, R ≡ √ γ4 − γ2 2 G 2 − γ 3 G 3 + 1 8 ( G 2 )2 − 1 4 G 4 , Gμν ≡ λ2 ( gμν + fa μfaν ) + (7) +2λ ( R(μν) + fa μR[aν] ) + Ra μRaν , Gν ν ≡ λ2 (d + fμνfμν) + (8) +2λ (RS + RA) + ( R2 S + R2 A ) with (the upper bar on the tensorial quantities in- dicates traceless condition, b2 in principle constant homogenizing the units) RS ≡ gμνR(μν), RA ≡ fμνR[μν], G ν ρG ρ ν ≡ G 2 , γ ≡ Gν ν d , Gμν ≡ Gμν − gμν 4 Gν ν , G ν λG λ ρG ρ ν ≡ G 3 , ( G ν ρG ρ ν )2 ≡ ( G 2 )2 , G ν μG μ λG λ ρG ρ ν ≡ G 4 , (9) where the variation was made with respect to the as- sumed for fρτ (electromagnetic) potential aτ as fol- lows: R(μν) = ◦ Rμν − T α μρ T ρ αν = −λgμν , (10) R[μν] = ∇αT α μν = −λfμν , (11) δ √ G δaτ = ∇ρ ( ∂ √ G ∂fρτ ) ≡ ∇ρF ρτ = = ∇ρ [ λ2Nμν ( δσ μ fρ ν + δσ ν fρ μ ) 2R ] = 0. (12) From this set, the link between the torsion T and f will be determined. Notice that total antisymmetry of the torsion is assumed due to the physical conse- quences that it property for T carry up. Also, f is not a priori potential for the torsion T and Nμν is a tensor coming from the variational procedure and defined in [1, 2]. Our goal is to take advantage of the geometrical and topological properties of this theory in order to determine the minimal group structure of the resultant space-time Manifold able to support a fermionic structure. From this fact, the relation between antisymmetric torsion and Dirac structure of the space-time is determined and the existence of an important contribution of the torsion to the gyro- magnetic factor of the fermions as follows [1, 2, 5]:[( P̂μ − eÂμ )2 − m2 − 1 2 eσμνFμν ] uλ+ (13) + 1 2 σμνRλ ρ[μν]u ρ − 1 2 eσμν ( ÂμP̂ν − Âν P̂μ ) uλ = 0. It is interesting to see that i) the above formula is absolutely general for the type of geometrical Lagrangians involved containing the generalized Ricci tensor inside, ii) for instance, the variation of the action will carry the symmetric contraction of components of the torsion tensor, then the arising of terms as hμ hν (hν is an axial vector dual of the torsion) . iii) the only thing that changes is the mass (see [2]) and the explicit form of the tensors involved as Rλ ρ[μν], Fμν , etc. is without variation of the Dirac gen- eral structure of the equation under consideration, iv) eq. (13) differs from the one obtained by Lan- dau and Lifshitz by the appearance of last two terms: the term involving the curvature tensor is due to the spin interaction with the gravitational field (due to the torsion term in Rλ ρ[μν]) and the last term is the spin interaction with the the electromagnetic and the mechanical momenta, v) expression (13) is valid for another vector vλ, then is valid for a bispinor of the form Ψ = u + iv, vi) the meaning for a quantum measurement of the space-time curvature is mainly due to the term in (13) involving explicitly the curvature tensor. The important point here is that the spin-gravity interaction term is so easily derived as the spinors are represented as space-time vectors whose covariant derivatives are defined in terms of the G-(affine) con- nection. In their original form the Dirac equations would have, in curved space-time, their momentum operators replaced by covariant derivatives in terms of “spin-connection” whose relation is not immedi- ately apparent. 2. DIRAC STRUCTURE, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AND ANOMALOUS GYROMAGNETIC FACTOR The interesting point now is based on the observation that if we introduce expression (11) in (13) then: [( P̂μ − eÂμ )2 − m2 − 1 2 eσμνFμν ] uλ− −λ d 1 2 γ5σμνf[μν]u λ − 1 2 eσμν ( ÂμP̂ν − Âν P̂μ ) uλ = 0, (14) [( P̂μ − eÂμ )2 − m2 − 1 2 σμν ( eFμν + γ5 λ d fμν )] uλ− (15) −e 2 σμν ( ÂμP̂ν − Âν P̂μ ) uλ = 0. We can see clearly that if Âμ = jaμ (with j being an arbitrary constant), Fμν = jfμν the last expression 140 takes the suggestive form:[( P̂μ − eÂμ )2 − m2 − 1 2 ( ej + γ5 λ d ) σμνfμν ] uλ− (16) −e 2 σμν ( ÂμP̂ν − Âν P̂μ ) uλ = 0 with the result that the term corresponding to the gy- romagnetic factor has been modified to ( j + γ5 λ ed ) /2. Notice that in an Unified Theory, with the character- istics introduced here, is reasonable the identification introduced in the previous step (F ↔ f) in order that the fields arise from the same geometrical struc- ture (as is possible due to the U(2, C) fundamental structure of the space-time, main ingredient of the arising of matter from the geometrical structure of the Manifold). The concrete implications about this important contribution of the torsion to the gyromagnetic fac- tor will be given elsewhere with great detail on the dynamical property of the torsion field. We remark only the following: i) there exists an important contribution of the torsion to the gyromagnetic factor that can have im- plicancies to the trouble of the anomalous momentum of fermionic particles, ii) this contribution appears (taking the second equality of expression (11)), as a modification on the vertex of interaction, almost from the effective point of view; iii) it is quite evident that this contribution will probably justify the little appearance of the torsion at great scale, because we can bound the torsion due to the other well known contributions to the anomalous momenta of the elementary particles (QED, weak, hadronic contribution, etc), iv) the form of the coupling spin-geometric struc- ture coming from the first principles, as the Dirac equation, not prescriptions, v) then, from iii) how the covariant derivative works in presence of torsion is totally determined by the G structure of the space-time, vi) the Dirac equation (14) (where the second part of the equivalence (11) was introduced coming from the equation of motion), said us that the vertex was modified without a dynamical function of propaga- tion. Then, other form to see the problem treated in this paragraph is to introduce the propagator for the torsion corresponding to the first part of the equiva- lence (11) written as follows: [( P̂μ − eÂμ )2 − m2 − 1 2 eσμνFμν ] uλ− − 1 2d γ5σμν∇μhνuλ− (17) −1 2 eσμν ( ÂμP̂ν − Âν P̂μ ) uλ = 0, where the relation between the totally antisymmetric torsion tensor and its dual hμ has been used. Ana- lyzing the first two terms of expression (17) we can guess the explicit form of the vertex and the effective Dirac Lagrangian where the new modification comes from: Lfeff = Ψ ( iγμ∂μ − m + γ5γμhμ + eγμAμ ) Ψ. Then, the formal Feynman propagator that we are looking for is evidently such: S (p) = ( iγμpμγμ − m + γ5γμhμ + eγμAμ ) · Δ Λ , where we have defined Δ ≡ (p2 − m2 + h2 + e2A2 ) + + 2 [ γ5 (p · h + mγμhμ) + e (p · A + emγμAμ) ] , Λ ≡ (p2 − m2 + h2 + e2A2 + iε )2 − − 4 [( p · (γ5h + eA ))2 − m2 ( h2 + e2A2 )] . This important possibility including several processes of interest in modern physics (anomalous momentum of the muon, velocity of the neutrino, neutrino spin flip, etc) will be studied soon else- where [5]. Acknowledgements I am very grateful to the organizers of this extraor- dinary meeting in memory of Alexander I. Akhiezer: outstanding person from the scientific and the hu- man points of view. Many thanks are given to Pro- fessors Yu. P. Stepanovsky and A. Dorokhov for my scientific formation and to my friend and collabora- tor S. N. Shulga for their interest and discussions; and particularly to Professor Yu Xin who introduced me into the subject of the Unified Theories based only on geometrical concepts and the Mach principle. This work was partially supported by CNPQ-MEC Brazil- ian funds. References 1. D.J. Cirilo-Lombardo // Int. J. Theor. Phys. 2010, v. 49, p. 1288-1301 (and references therein). 2. D.J. Cirilo-Lombardo // Int. J. Theor. Phys. DOI 10.1007/s10773-011-0678-1 (and references therein). 3. D.J. Cirilo-Lombardo // Class. Quantum Grav. 2005, v. 22, p. 4987-5004 (and references therein). 4. P. Singh // Class. Quantum Grav. 1990, v. 7, p. 2125. 5. D.J. Cirilo-Lombardo and S.N. Shulga, in prepa- ration. 141 � ������� ��� � ������ ���� �� ��������� ����� ��� � � � � ���� ������ ��� ��� ������ ������ �� �� ���� ���������� �� ���������� �������� ����� ��� � �������� ������� � � �������� ����� � ��������� ��� ������� ���� � ����� ���� �������� ����� ���� � ������ � ������ � ! �� �������� "�� ���# �� ���� � �� �� ���������� ����� ��� ��� ��� ��������$�� ����������� ��� ���� !����� � ��� ��� �$� �� ������ ��� �� ������ ���� �� ���� � ����� � � � � ���� ������ ��� ��� �����% &����' �� %' ���� ��������% �� ����������� ��%���� ����� %�� ��� ��������% ������% � � �����%�����% � �%������� ��� ����' ���� �� � ���� ��������� ��(���� �%� � %���� % ������ $�� �������� "����� ## ��� ����% '��% �%����% ����%��� ��� ����� �����%��$%� ����������� %�� � ��� ������ � ��� ��� ��� )*+