On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors
We study the vertical structure of a thin α–disk [1] in a Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitor system. Accurate equation of state and opacity of solar composition material are used. The results show pronounced features in the disk structure in the regions of ionization and molecule dissociation. We...
Gespeichert in:
Datum: | 2012 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
2012
|
Schriftenreihe: | Вопросы атомной науки и техники |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/107094 |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Zitieren: | On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors / A.V. Zhiglo // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 193-197. — Бібліогр.: 18 назв. — англ. |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraineid |
irk-123456789-107094 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
irk-123456789-1070942016-10-14T03:02:24Z On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors Zhiglo, A.V. Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology We study the vertical structure of a thin α–disk [1] in a Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitor system. Accurate equation of state and opacity of solar composition material are used. The results show pronounced features in the disk structure in the regions of ionization and molecule dissociation. We analyze the mass distribution in the disk, aiming to find the system parameters at which this mass distribution could explain the high velocity features (HVF) in SN Ia spectra [2]. We conclude that accretion disks are unlikely candidates for explaining the HVF. Мы изучаем вертикальную структуру тонкого α-диска [1] в системе предшественника сверхновой типа Iа (СН Iа). Использованы точное уравнение состояния и коэффициенты непрозрачности вещества солнечного состава. Результаты демонстрируют выраженные особенности в структуре диска в областях диссоциации молекул и ионизации. Анализируется распределение массы в диске с целью найти параметры системы, при которых это распределение могло бы объяснить высокоскоростные особенности (ВСО) в спектрах СН Iа [2]. Мы делаем вывод, что классические аккреционные диски являются маловероятными кандидатами для объяснения ВСО. Ми вивчаємо вертикальну структуру тонкого α-диску [1] в системі попередника наднової типу Іа (НН Іа). Застосовані точне рівняння стану і непрозорість речовини сонячного складу. Результати демонструють виражені особливості в структурі диску в областях дисоціації молекул та іонізації. Аналізується розподіл маси в диску з метою знайти параметри системи, при яких цей розподіл міг би бути поясненням особливостей з великими швидкостями (ОВШ) в спектрах НН Іа [2]. Ми робимо висновок, що класичні акреційні диски не є правдоподібними кандидатами для пояснення ОВШ. 2012 Article On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors / A.V. Zhiglo // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 193-197. — Бібліогр.: 18 назв. — англ. 1562-6016 PACS: 97.10.Gz, 97.60.Bw, 95.30.Lz, 44.40.+a, 44.25.+f, 42.25.Bs, 05.70.Ce, 05.20.-y, 02.70.Bf, 02.60.Lj http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/107094 en Вопросы атомной науки и техники Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України |
institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
collection |
DSpace DC |
language |
English |
topic |
Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology |
spellingShingle |
Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology Zhiglo, A.V. On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors Вопросы атомной науки и техники |
description |
We study the vertical structure of a thin α–disk [1] in a Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitor system. Accurate equation of state and opacity of solar composition material are used. The results show pronounced features in the disk structure in the regions of ionization and molecule dissociation. We analyze the mass distribution in the disk, aiming to find the system parameters at which this mass distribution could explain the high velocity features (HVF) in SN Ia spectra [2]. We conclude that accretion disks are unlikely candidates for explaining the HVF. |
format |
Article |
author |
Zhiglo, A.V. |
author_facet |
Zhiglo, A.V. |
author_sort |
Zhiglo, A.V. |
title |
On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors |
title_short |
On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors |
title_full |
On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors |
title_fullStr |
On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors |
title_full_unstemmed |
On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors |
title_sort |
on vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors |
publisher |
Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України |
publishDate |
2012 |
topic_facet |
Section C. Theory of Elementary Particles. Cosmology |
url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/107094 |
citation_txt |
On vertical structure of accretion disks in type ia supernova progenitors / A.V. Zhiglo // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2012. — № 1. — С. 193-197. — Бібліогр.: 18 назв. — англ. |
series |
Вопросы атомной науки и техники |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zhigloav onverticalstructureofaccretiondisksintypeiasupernovaprogenitors |
first_indexed |
2025-07-07T19:29:15Z |
last_indexed |
2025-07-07T19:29:15Z |
_version_ |
1837017655338336256 |
fulltext |
ON VERTICAL STRUCTURE OF ACCRETION DISKS IN
TYPE IA SUPERNOVA PROGENITORS
A.V. Zhiglo ∗
National Science Center “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology”, 61108, Kharkov, Ukraine
(Received November 21, 2011)
We study the vertical structure of a thin α−disk [1] in a Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) progenitor system. Accurate
equation of state and opacity of solar composition material are used. The results show pronounced features in the
disk structure in the regions of ionization and molecule dissociation. We analyze the mass distribution in the disk,
aiming to find the system parameters at which this mass distribution could explain the high velocity features (HVF)
in SN Ia spectra [2]. We conclude that accretion disks are unlikely candidates for explaining the HVF.
PACS: 97.10.Gz, 97.60.Bw, 95.30.Lz, 44.40.+a, 44.25.+f, 42.25.Bs, 05.70.Ce, 05.20.-y, 02.70.Bf, 02.60.Lj
1. INTRODUCTION
Disk structures are ubiquitous in the Universe. They
are formed when gas is drifted by gravitational force
to the center of attraction, in the process decreas-
ing its angular momentum by transporting it to the
gas layers farther from the center via some viscosity
mechanism. What is loosely called “gas” may in real-
ity be plasma, it may contain solid particles, depend-
ing on the specific situation. Viscosity is believed to
be turbulent/convective eddy viscosity, it may have
magnetic origin; microscopic molecular viscosity is
negligible to play any role. The heat being released
by the viscosity, as well as other heat sources like irra-
diation by the central object, hot inner regions of the
disk, other objects in the disk environment, is trans-
ferred to the disk surface and radiated into space.
The heat production in the disk normally leads to the
gas temperature increasing towards the disk equato-
rial plane; thermal pressure of the gas supports the
gas vertical distribution (in z−direction, along the
average gas momentum vector, perpendicular to the
disk plane of symmetry), prevents it from collapsing
to the equatorial plane.
Various phenomena in the disks, instabilities of
the disks in their environment lead to intricate struc-
ture formation (galaxies, protoplanetary disks). Ra-
diation from various disk regions is observed by as-
tronomers, from subtle spectral features due to rela-
tively dim protostellar and circumstellar disks, to ac-
tive galactic nuclei and quasars, the brightest objects
in the Universe, which are powered by accretion.
Different approximations are used for modeling
different types of disk systems, or even different re-
gions within the same disk, as certain effects impor-
tant in one regime (e.g. radiation pressure, radial
thermal energy advection, magnetic fields, disk self-
gravity, irradiation by the nearby bright sources) are
not important in the other ones. In this paper we
study vertical structure of circumstellar disks, with
parameters typical of the progenitor of type Ia su-
pernova (SN Ia) system. Our interest is twofold:
1. Analyzing the role of accretion discs (AD) in
high-velocity features (HVF) in the spectra of SN Ia,
now considered ubiquitous [3,4]. HVF are absorption
lines in the spectrum, in particular CaII infrared (IR)
triplet near 800 nm, seen blueshifted at velocities
∼ 17 000... 29 000 km s−1 (up to 40 000 in SN 1994D),
higher than the expansion velocity of the photosphere
of the SN Ia ejecta. HVF are observed before, and
up to ∼a week after SN Ia maximum light, then they
fade. Several explanations were proposed for this fea-
ture. One generic model [2] not requiring Ca over-
production or any modifications to the now standard
SN Ia scenarios is that these high-velocity lines are
produced in a shell formed from circumstellar mater-
ial (CSM) and outermost SN Ia ejecta as the former
is overrun by the latter. The circumstellar material
is assumed of standard solar composition.
This model was successfully tested by several
groups against observations. It requires substantial
mass of the shell: 5... 7× 10−3M� for SN 2005cg [4],
∼ 0.02M� for SN 2003du [2], 0.1M� for SN 1999ee
[5], 0.2M� for SN 2005hj [6]. Large fraction of this
mass originates from the CSM located in the vicinity
of the SN Ia center, at distances < 1.5× 1015 cm (for
SN 2003du [2], from HVF timing considerations).
According to a single-degenerate scenario, SN Ia
is a result of a thermonuclear explosion of a WD [7]
that reached nearly Chandrasekhar mass (MCh ∼
1.38M�) by accreting mass from a companion star,
through Roche lobe overflow. Accretion disk (AD) is
thus a natural candidate for the nearby mass.
2. In our simulations we use real equation of state
(EOS) and opacities of solar composition gas [8–10],
∗E-mail address: azhiglo@kipt.kharkov.ua
PROBLEMS OF ATOMIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, N 1.
Series: Nuclear Physics Investigations (57), p. 193-197.
193
as the estimates of the disc mass found in the lit-
erature differ significantly, likely depending on the
approximations used. As a result we are able to ob-
serve interesting features of the disk structure, in par-
ticular in the regions where H2 molecules dissociate,
where H and He ionize. While we only present our re-
sults for the specific value of the central object mass
(1.37 M�, slightly under-Chandrasekhar WD) and a
range of accretion rates relevant for SN Ia, similar
features are observed for other disk parameters, and
may have observational consequences. We integrate
the structure equations to radii smaller than the WD
radius (and a larger envelope around it formed as a
result of accreted fuel burning on the WD surface) to
spot all these features.
2. THEORY AND NUMERICAL METHOD
Circumstellar disks around compact objects with rel-
atively low accretion rates are described by a thin
α−disk model [1]. Parameter α defines effective kine-
matic viscosity coefficient, ν = αcsH , where cs is the
sound speed in the disk material, H is a characteris-
tic scale height of the disk. This prescription assumes
that characteristic turbulent velocity is αcs, and char-
acteristic turbulent eddy size is of order H . In orig-
inal formulation [1] the vertical structure of AD (i.e.
distribution of density ρ, pressure P , temperature T ,
heat flux F , etc. along vertical z−direction) was not
studied in detail. Rough estimate H = cs/Ω was
made, where Ω is the Keplerian angular velocity at a
given radius r in the disk. We use prescription
ν = ε
(
2r3
GM
)1/2
P
ρ
[
1 +
2GMρ
Pr3
z2
]−1/2
(1)
from [11] for direct comparison of the results. The
square brackets here seem to take into account scale
height (the height above the given point at which
pressure changes by a factor of e) decreasing with z,
due to increasing gz = GMz/(r2 + z2)3/2, the verti-
cal component of gravity of the central object (nearly-
Chandrasekhar WD in our study, M = 1.37M�). We
used this prescription verbatim, albeit keeping these
brackets is inconsistent with the thin disk approxi-
mation used, which neglects other effects ∼ (z/r)2.
It is claimed in [11] that relating ε to α as
α = 3· 2−1/2ε yields description equivalent to original
α−model near the disk equatorial plane. We could
not reproduce that estimate; instead we get ε = α if
H is defined as a scaleheight at z = 0. When original
prescription [1] with H = cs/Ω was used in our com-
putations (it is used this way by many authors) we
really got results close to those with recipe (1) with
ε = α. We still define α − ε correspondence below
as α = 3· 2−1/2ε in agreement with [11]. α = 0.07 is
adopted as the base value, corresponding to ε = 1/30
in [11]; values of α close to this are considered appro-
priate for circumstellar disks based on observations.
It should be kept in mind that this may correspond
to α = 0.033 for the other definition of H used.
As cs � Ωr radial pressure gradient is too small
to support resting gas in radial graviatational field,
dp/dr � grρ. The gas thus rotates with almost Ke-
plerian velocity, which by far exceeds its radial drift
velocity, vr � vφ. The heat is produced due to vis-
cous friction between adjacent differentially rotating
layers of gas; this determines vertical heat flux F :
dF
dz
=
9
4
GMνρ
r3
; (2)
radial heat flux is neglected in a thin disk. This heat
is transported mainly by radiation and convection
towards the disk photosphere, and is radiated into
space. We use exact solution for the temperature
gradient needed for transporting F in the upper ra-
diative region of AD [12], in grey atmosphere approx-
imation. At large optical depth 1 � τ(z) ≡ ∫ ∞
z κρdz
(Rosseland mean opacity κ is used) this simplifies to
diffusion approximation often used [11]:
dT
dz
∣∣∣∣
rad
=
−3κρF
16σSBT 3
, (3)
σSB being Stefan-Boltzmann constant. When the
found pure radiative dT/dz exceeds adiabatic gra-
dient Chandrasekhar instability drives convection,
which transfers the heat in such regions; we set con-
vective temperature gradient then as:
dT
dz
∣∣∣∣
conv
= −γ2gzρ
T
P
, γ2 =
∂ ln T
∂ ln P
∣∣∣∣
S
. (4)
Rosseland mean opacities are taken from [9, 10] for
solar composition disc [13]. Equation of state (EOS),
including γ2 are taken from [8].
We solve numerically a boundary-value problem
for Eqs. (2)–(4) and dp/dz = −gzρ with boundary
conditions: F |z=0 = 0, F |z=z0 = F0 = 3GMṀ
8πr3 ,
values for Pz=z0 and Tz=z0 consistent with F0 and
τz=z0 = τ0. τ0 was fixed at 10−9, z0 was found by
requiring F |z=0 = 0 when integrating down from z0.
3. RESULTS
We varied accretion rate, shown in the figures if dif-
ferent from its default value of Ṁ = 10−6M� yr−1;
and α, the default value being α = 0.07. We show the
results for Ṁ ∈ [4×10−8; 2×10−6]M� yr−1 that cov-
ers (still controversial) rates typical of SN Ia progeni-
tors [14–16]. α’s in the range we study are used in the
literature for various disk systems. Lower α values
are seen to produce thicker and more massive disks.
α = 0.01 is used for T Tauri stars [17], α = 0.001 was
proposed for FU Orionis outbursts. However, larger
values of α ∼ 0.07 and above are currently consid-
ered appropriate for circumstellar disks in post-main
sequence binaries.
Fig. 1 shows profile of AD photosphere zτ ≡
zτ=2/3. It is plotted divided by r; zτ/r = const
would correspond to conical disk shape. The inner
thick disk region is radiation pressure dominated. At
r < 4 × 109 cm the disk is predominantly convec-
tive, in agreement with [11]. It is mostly radiative
at r ∈ [7× 109; 3× 1010] cm; comparable proportions
194
of radiative and convective regions are observed at
r ∈ [5 × 1010; 1.2 × 1011]cm. The structure is more
complex than in [11], likely due to varying opacity in
this region due to lines of heavy elements accounted
for in this work. The dip after r ≈ 1.2 × 1011 cm is
due to HeIII recombining into HeII, as may be in-
ferred from equatorial temperature profile in Fig. 2.
The disk becomes convective abruptly, but contrary
to [11] it becomes radiative back at r ≈ 4 × 1012cm
(where hydrogen has become molecular, after the
wide region where H and He recombine and H2 mole-
cules form); 3 more transitions occur at larger radii,
as hydrogen γ2 changes. The disk regains about a
half of its pre-dip slope at r ≈ 1013cm; the slope
declines slowly at larger radii through 1016cm we in-
tegrated to. Similar features are observed for all Ṁ
we tried.
Fig. 1. Integral slope of AD photosphere zτ/r, at
Ṁ = 10−6M� yr−1 and various α
10
7
10
8
10
9
10
10
10
11
10
12
10
13
10
14
10
-16
10
-14
10
-12
10
-10
10
-8
10
-6
10
-4
10
-2
α=0.009
α=0.018
α=0.036
α=0.07
α=0.14
α=0.28
m
/2
,
M
su
n
r, cm
10
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
10
7
10
8
m/2
T
z=
0
,
K
T
Fig. 2. Equatorial temperature and half-mass of
AD at Ṁ = 10−6M� yr−1. Photospheric tempera-
ture T (zτ ) is independent of α
10
6
10
7
10
8
10
9
10
10
10
11
10
12
10
13
10
14
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
α=0.009
α=0.018
α=0.036
α=0.07
α=0.14
α=0.28
0
.5
d
m
/d
S
,
g
cm
-2
r, cm
Fig. 3. Half surface mass density of AD,
1/2
∫∞
−∞ ρ(r, z) dz as a function of radius, at
Ṁ = 10−6M� yr−1
Fig. 4. Dependence of zτ (r)/r on accretion rate
dM/dt (in units of M� yr−1) at α = 0.07
10
6
10
7
10
8
10
9
10
10
10
11
10
12
10
13
10
14
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
5
10
6
dM/dt =2.5x10
-7
dM/dt =10
-7
dM/dt =4x10
-8
dM/dt =2x10
-6
Msun yr
-1
dM/dt =10
-6
dM/dt =5x10
-7
0
.5
d
m
/d
S
,
g
cm
-2
r, cm
Fig. 5. Half surface mass density of AD at various
accretion rates dM/dt. α = 0.07
Fig. 3 shows surface mass density vs radius. The
disk profile and surface density at α = 0.07 and dif-
ferent accretion rates are shown in Figs. 4 and 5. 2D
distributions of density and temperature in the inner
part of the disk are shown in Figs. 6 and 7.
It is seen in Fig. 2 that AD radius must exceed
∼ 3 AU for its mass to reach 0.01M�. As the disk ra-
dius is smaller that that of the WD Roche lobe, this
means that only largest supergiants (SG) could serve
as the WD companions for such massive disks. It is
still possible to observe sufficient line-of-sight mass
density when watching close to the disk equatorial
plane — at smaller radii. Fig. 8 shows anisotropy
in mass distribution, for 3 radii chosen. Equivalent
spherical CSM mass is me(θ) = 2dm/dθ/ cosθ. It
is seen that me(0) (twice the value shown in Fig. 9)
varies in [4 × 10−3; 9 × 10−2]M� for AD parameters
shown, at rAD ≈1 AU. However, anisotropy of the
mass distribution disagrees with observations [18].
Fig. 6. Density distribution in the inner part of
AD. α = 0.07, Ṁ = 10−6M� yr−1
195
Fig. 7. Temperature in the inner part of AD.
α = 0.07, Ṁ = 10−6M� yr−1
Fig. 8. Angular density of the mass distribution.
Angle θ of the line-of-sight is measured from the
disk equatorial plane. Five sets of disk parameters
are shown, differing in accretion rate, indicated
in the legend at the respective curves (in units of
M� yr−1.) The group labeled “1e − 6α” corresponds
to Ṁ = 10−6, α = 0.009; in the rest of the models
α = 0.07. 3 curves are shown for each model, for
disk radii 1.55×1011, 1.55×1013 and 6.17×1013 cm.
Smaller radii correspond to lower curves
10
8
10
9
10
10
10
11
10
12
10
13
10
14
10
-11
10
-10
10
-9
10
-8
10
-7
10
-6
10
-5
10
-4
10
-3
10
-2
10
-1
d
m
/d
q
� θ
=
0
M
su
n
/r
ad
dM/dt =2x10
-6
, α=0.07
dM/dt =2.5x10
-7
, α=0.07
dM/dt =10
-7
, α=0.07
r, cm
dM/dt =10
-6
, α=0.0045
dM/dt =10
-6
, α=0.018
dM/dt =10
-6
, α=0.07
dM/dt =10
-6
, α=0.28
Fig. 9. dm/dθ at θ = 0 as a function of radius.
Note that to get an inferred CSM mass of 10−2M�
the disk radius must exceed 1012cm even at very
low α = 0.0045. For the base model we study
(α = 0.07, Ṁ = 10−6) the disk radius should be
1013cm, implying a SG companion
4. DISCUSSION
The results for the disk mass distribution are thus
hard to reconcile with observed ubiquity of HVF, as-
suming ADs the main source of the CSM mass re-
quired by impact model [2]. The disks must have
substantial radii to have sufficient projected mass
density even in their equatorial plane. Disks in bi-
naries with Main Sequence stars are too light by a
factor of 103... 104. Only SG companions seem to al-
low for disks of sufficient radius; such larger disks are
pronouncedly flatter, dm/dθ drops by a factor of 10
within ∼ 6◦ off equatorial θ = 0 plane. Such mass
distribution is at odds with current observations [18].
Significantly lower α would alleviate both of these
discrepancies.
Better treatment of convection would alter the
results somewhat. Temperature gradient would in-
crease, so would the disk mass density; the disk would
become flatter at the same time. The difference
should not change the conclusions qualitatively, as
comparison with radiative regions suggests.
The dust was assumed in thermal and hydrostatic
equilibrium with gas. If it settles down to z = 0 fast
in radiative regions that would decrease opacity, thus
the temperature gradient.
The disk self-gravity was neglected, as the total
disk mass does not exceed a few hundredth of solar
mass. Gravity of the companion was found to alter
the layers above AD photosphere substantially, but
not have much effect on the inner layers and total
disk mass.
AD irradiation by the WD and its companion
was ignored. The bump in the disk photosphere
at r ≈ 1.2 × 1011 cm is high enough to shield the
outer regions from the central object radiation; ir-
radiation effect is insignificant at the bump and at
smaller radii. The radiation from the bump (with
surface T ≈ 104 K) and from the companion star is
intercepted by the disk. Irradiation usually makes
disks lighter and geometrically thicker [17]; AD mass
is still strongly concentrated towards z = 0.
It is unlikely that disk effective opening angle may
be made larger due to impact with ejecta, as the lat-
ter runs through the disk with highly supersonic ve-
locity. The outer, massive disk layers might broaden
due to strong radiation from the growing SN Ia pho-
tosphere, before being hit by the ejecta. The total
disk mass would then have to be of order 0.01M� to
lead to the observed HVF; this requires yet smaller
α or more extended disk. Under no circumstances a
disk in a binary system with a main-sequence star
as a WD companion is a plausible candidate for the
circumstellar mass sufficient to explain the HVF via
mechanism [2]. High temperatures of the gas in the
disk at distances of order a few million kilometers
would lead to H or He lines visible in early SN Ia
spectra, contrary to observations. What the origin
of the circumstellar mass in WD–MS binaries is (or
whether HVF have some other, not CSM origin) thus
remains an open question, requiring further theoret-
ical and observational study.
References
1. N.I. Shakura, R.A. Sunyaev. Black Holes in
Binary Systems. Observational Appearance //
A&A. 1973, v. 24, p. 337-355.
196
2. C.L. Gerardy et al. SN 2003du: Signatures of the
Circumstellar Environment in a Normal Type Ia
Supernova? // ApJ. 2004, v. 607, p. 391-405.
3. P.A. Mazzali et al. High-velocity Features: a
Ubiquitous Property of Type Ia Supernovae //
ApJ. 2005, v. 623, p. L37-L40.
4. R. Quimby et al. SN 2005cg: Explosion Physics
and Circumstellar Interaction of a Normal Type
Ia Supernova in a Low-Luminosity Host // ApJ.
2006, v. 636, p. 400-405.
5. P.A. Mazzali et al. High-velocity features in the
spectra of the Type Ia supernova SN 1999ee:
a property of the explosion or evidence of cir-
cumstellar interaction? // MNRAS. 2005, v. 357,
p. 200-206.
6. R. Quimby, P. Höflich, J.C. Wheeler. SN
2005hj: Evidence for Two Classes of Normal-
Bright SNe Ia and Implications for Cosmology
// ApJ. 2007, v. 666, p. 1083-1092.
7. F. Hoyle, W.A. Fowler. Nucleosynthesis in Su-
pernovae // ApJ. 1960, v. 132, p. 565-590.
8. F.J. Rogers and A. Nayfonov. Updated and Ex-
panded OPAL Equation-of-State Tables: Impli-
cations for Helioseismology // ApJ. 2002, v. 576,
p. 1064–1074.
9. C.A. Iglesias and F.J. Rogers. Updated OPAL
Opacities // ApJ. 1996, v. 464, p. 943-953.
10. J.W. Ferguson et al. Low Temperature Opacities
// ApJ. 2005, v. 623, p. 585–596.
11. F. Meyer, E. Meyer-Hofmeister. Vertical struc-
ture of accretion disks // A&A. 1982, v. 106,
p. 34-42.
12. D. Mihalas. Stellar Atmospheres. 2nd Ed. San
Francisco: Freeman & Co., 1978, 632 p.
13. N. Grevesse, A. Noels. Cosmic abundances of
the elements // Proc. Symp. “Origin and evo-
lution of the elements”. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1993, p. 15-25.
14. R. Sienkiewicz. Stability of White Dwarfs Un-
dergoing Spherically Symmetric Steady-state ac-
cretion // A&A. 1980, v. 85, p. 295-301.
15. K. Nomoto. Accreting white dwarf models for
type I supernovae. I. Presupernova evolution
and triggering mechanisms // ApJ. 1982, v.2̇53,
p. 798-810.
16. S.-C. Yoon, N. Langer, S. Scheithauer. Effects
of rotation on the helium burning shell source
in accreting white dwarfs // A&A. 2004, v. 425,
p. 217-228.
17. P. D’Alessio, J. Canto, N. Calvet, S. Lizano.
Accretion Disks around Young Objects. I. The
Detailed Vertical Structure // ApJ. 1998, v. 500,
p. 411-427.
18. M. Tanaka, P.A. Mazzali, K. Maeda, K. No-
moto. Three-dimensional Models for High-
Velocity Features in Type Ia Supernovae // ApJ.
2006, v. 645, p. 470-479.
� �������
���
�������� ������������ ��
���
� ������
���������
��������� ���� ��
���� �����
�� ������
����
������ ����
���� ���
��� ���
� ���
����� � ��������
����
� �
�����
�� ���
�� �� � ! ��"# $�������
��� ������ ���
����� �����%��% �
�&''�(����� ��������������
�)���
�
���������� �����
�# *��������� �� ����������
���+����� ���,�������
����
���� ���
�
�,���
��%� �����(��(�� ���
�� � ������(��# -�����������% ������������� ����
���
� � (���� �����
���� ���� ����� �. ���
������ &�� ������������� ���� ,� �,/%�����
���
��
�������� ���,�����
��� �0 1"
���
���� ! �� �2�# �� �����
�
��. ���
��������
�� �
��(������ ���
� %
�%���%
���
���%��� �
�������� � ��% �,/%�����% 0 1#
��� �������
��
�������� ���������� ��
���
� ������������ �������� ���� ��
���� �����
��
�
��3 �
����
����� ����
���� ���
��� ���
� ���
����� 4 ���������
� �����
�5 ���� ��
�!! ��"# 6������
��4 ����� �4
�%��% ����� 4 ��������4��� ����
��� ���%����� �
����# *��������� ���
���������
���+��4 ���,��
���4
����
���4 ���
�
�,����%� ����(4�(45 ���
�� �� 4��4��(45# -���4�
��3���% ������4� ���
���
� � ���� ������ ���� ���� ����� �. ��� %
�� (�� ������4� 4� ,� ,���
��%�����% ���,��
����� �
���
� � �
��
���% � �107"
���
���� !! �� �2�# �� ��,� �
����
�
.
)�
������4 �
��(4��4 ���
� �� 3 ���
�����4,�� �
�������� � ��% ��%�����% 107#
�89
|