Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area

Forty-one species of naked amoebas were found in the different types of waterbodies of Zhytomyr and Volyn’ parts of Ukrainian Polissya region. The major part of species of naked amoebas in this region demonstrated the prevalence to living in a certain type of water body that possible depends on the...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2012
Автори: Patcyuk, M.K., Dovgal, I.V.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут зоології ім. І.І. Шмальгаузена НАН України 2012
Назва видання:Вестник зоологии
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/109418
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area / M.K. Patcyuk, I.V. Dovgal // Вестник зоологии. — 2012. — Т. 46, № 4. — С. 355–360. — Бібліогр.: 11 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-109418
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1094182016-11-29T03:02:21Z Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area Patcyuk, M.K. Dovgal, I.V. Краткие сообщения Forty-one species of naked amoebas were found in the different types of waterbodies of Zhytomyr and Volyn’ parts of Ukrainian Polissya region. The major part of species of naked amoebas in this region demonstrated the prevalence to living in a certain type of water body that possible depends on the hydrochemical and trophic parameters of water. The limnetic and floodplain species complexes of amoebas are distinguished in Ukrainian Polissya. В водоёмах разного типа Житомирского и Волынского Полесья Украины был обнаружен 41 вид голых амёб. Большая часть видов голых амеб в регионе демонстрирует определенные предпочтения к обитанию в отдельных типах водоема, что, вероятно, связано с комплексом гидрохимических и трофических факторов. Выделены два видовых комплекса голых амеб: озерный и связанный с поймами рек 2012 Article Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area / M.K. Patcyuk, I.V. Dovgal // Вестник зоологии. — 2012. — Т. 46, № 4. — С. 355–360. — Бібліогр.: 11 назв. — англ. 0084-5604 DOI 10.2478/v10058-012-0028-7 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/109418 593.121(477.41/.42) en Вестник зоологии Інститут зоології ім. І.І. Шмальгаузена НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic Краткие сообщения
Краткие сообщения
spellingShingle Краткие сообщения
Краткие сообщения
Patcyuk, M.K.
Dovgal, I.V.
Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area
Вестник зоологии
description Forty-one species of naked amoebas were found in the different types of waterbodies of Zhytomyr and Volyn’ parts of Ukrainian Polissya region. The major part of species of naked amoebas in this region demonstrated the prevalence to living in a certain type of water body that possible depends on the hydrochemical and trophic parameters of water. The limnetic and floodplain species complexes of amoebas are distinguished in Ukrainian Polissya.
format Article
author Patcyuk, M.K.
Dovgal, I.V.
author_facet Patcyuk, M.K.
Dovgal, I.V.
author_sort Patcyuk, M.K.
title Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area
title_short Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area
title_full Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area
title_fullStr Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area
title_full_unstemmed Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area
title_sort biotopic distribution of naked amoebas (protista) in ukrainian polissya area
publisher Інститут зоології ім. І.І. Шмальгаузена НАН України
publishDate 2012
topic_facet Краткие сообщения
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/109418
citation_txt Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area / M.K. Patcyuk, I.V. Dovgal // Вестник зоологии. — 2012. — Т. 46, № 4. — С. 355–360. — Бібліогр.: 11 назв. — англ.
series Вестник зоологии
work_keys_str_mv AT patcyukmk biotopicdistributionofnakedamoebasprotistainukrainianpolissyaarea
AT dovgaliv biotopicdistributionofnakedamoebasprotistainukrainianpolissyaarea
first_indexed 2025-07-07T23:01:52Z
last_indexed 2025-07-07T23:01:52Z
_version_ 1837031031564140544
fulltext UDC 593.121(477.41/.42) BIOTOPIC DISTRIBUTION OF NAKED AMOEBAS (PROTISTA) IN UKRAINIAN POLISSYA AREA M. K. Patcyuk1, I. V. Dovgal2 1 I. Franko Zhytomir State University Pushkin str., 42, Zhytomir, 10002 Ukraine E-mail: kostivna@ukr.net 2 Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology of the NAS of Ukraine B. Chmielnicky str., 15, Kyiv, 01601 Ukraine E-mail: dovgal@izan.kiev.ua Received 3 January 2012 Accepted 28 May 2012 Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area. Patcyuk M. K., Dovgal I. V. – Forty-one species of naked amoebas were found in the different types of waterbodies of Zhytomyr and Volyn’ parts of Ukrainian Polissya region. The major part of species of naked amoebas in this region demonstrated the prevalence to living in a certain type of water body that possible depends on the hydrochemical and trophic parameters of water. The limnetic and floodplain species complexes of amoebas are distinguished in Ukrainian Polissya. Ke y wo r d s: naked amoebas, biotop, type of waterbody, Ukrainian Polissya. Áèîòîïè÷åñêîå ðàñïðåäåëåíèå ãîëûõ àì¸á (Protista) â Óêðàèíñêîì Ïîëåñüå. Ïàöþê Ì. Ê., Äîâãàëü È. Â. –  âîäî¸ìàõ ðàçíîãî òèïà Æèòîìèðñêîãî è Âîëûíñêîãî Ïîëåñüÿ Óêðàèíû áûë îáíàðóæåí 41 âèä ãîëûõ àì¸á. Áîëüøàÿ ÷àñòü âèäîâ ãîëûõ àìåá â ðåãèîíå äåìîíñòðèðóåò îïðå- äåëåííûå ïðåäïî÷òåíèÿ ê îáèòàíèþ â îòäåëüíûõ òèïàõ âîäîåìà, ÷òî, âåðîÿòíî, ñâÿçàíî ñ êîì- ïëåêñîì ãèäðîõèìè÷åñêèõ è òðîôè÷åñêèõ ôàêòîðîâ. Âûäåëåíû äâà âèäîâûõ êîìïëåêñà ãîëûõ àìåá: îçåðíûé è ñâÿçàííûé ñ ïîéìàìè ðåê. Êëþ÷åâûå ñ ëîâ à: ãîëûå àì¸áû, áèîòîï, òèï âîäîåìà, Óêðàèíñêîå Ïîëåñüå. Introduction The naked amoebas is a group of morphologically and ecologically similar but not affined organisms; taxa of naked amoebas at present time are incorporated into several macrotaxa of eukaryotes (Adl et al., 2005). The naked amoebas inhabit different aquatic biotopes with various conditions. However, some aspects of autecol- ogy of the naked amoebas including their biocoenotic distribution are scantily known. It is a widespread opin- ion that the species of free-living protists including naked amoebas have a cosmopolitan distribution and are ubiquists (Fenchel, 1987). The aim of this article is to analyze relative prevalence of different amoeban species to certain types of waterbodies under conditions of Ukrainian Polissya. Material and methods The material was collected by the first author during 2010 and 2011 in 124 localities in Zhytomyr and Volyn parts of Ukrainian Polissya (fig. 1); 395 samples were collected in 44 rivers, 32 flood-plain waterbod- ies, 20 soil-reclamation canals, 28 flood-plain bogs and 23 lakes (Lakes of Shatsk). Samples (water with roiled sediments) were collected by hand and transported in the glass vessels to the laboratory without fixation. Cloning of amoebas was performed in Petri dishes on non-nutrient agar with Page’s (1988) method. Amoebas were inves- tigated using the microscope Axio Imager M1 with differential interferential contrast at the center of collec- tive usage of scientific equipment «Animalia» of Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology, Kyiv. Identification of amoe- bas was performed in two stages. Firstly was defined for which morphotype shared the organism (Smirnov, Goodkov, 1999; Smirnov, Brown, 2004), and then species were identified, where possible (Page, 1988, Smirnov et al., 2007; Smirnov, 2008). Vestnik zoologii, 46(4): e-36—e-41, 2012 DOI 10.2478/v10058-012-0028-7 Êðàòêèå ñîîáùåíèÿ Unauthenticated Download Date | 11/27/16 8:17 PM The similarity between species compositions in different waterbodies was estimate using cluster analysis with PAST 1.92 software (Hammer et al., 2001) using Chekanowski-Serensen’s (Dice in PAST) and Shymkevich-Simpson’s (Simpson in PAST) indexes (Pesenko, 1982). The frequency of naked amoebas occurrences was estimated as part of samples which contain the species per general number of samples. In this work we used the typification of continental waters after Konstantinov (1986) and Romanenko (2001). Results and discussion Fourty-one species of the naked amoebas were found in the different types of waterbodies in the region. Twenty-four species of Gymnamoebia were found in flood- plain waterbodies, only 8 species observed in soil-reclamation canals and 14 species in bogs whereas both in rivers and Lakes of Shatsk were found 20 species (table 1). Twenty-three species were recorded in single type of waterbodies. Thus, 12 species, Amoeba proteus Leidy, 1878, Polychaos sp., Thecamoeba sphaeronucleolus (Greeff, 1891) Page, 1977, Saccamoeba wakulla Bovee, 1972, Mayorella penardi Page, 1972, Mayorella viridis Leidy, 1874, Rhizamoeba sp. (2), Cochliopodium sp. (2), Stygamoeba sp., Pellita digitata (Greef, 1866) Smirnov et Kudryavtsev, 2004, Arachnula impatiens Cienkowski, 1876 and Penardia mutabilis Cash, 1904 were found only in lakes; 3 species: Thecamoeba quadrilineata Carter, 1856, Thecamoeba verrucosa (Echrenberg, 1838) Gläser, 1912 and Korotnevella diskophora Smirnov, 1999 were found only in floodplain waterbodies; 2 species: Ripella sp. and Rhizamoeba sp. (1) in bogs whereas 2 other species: Mayorella sp. (2) and Willaertia sp. found in rivers only. Such species as Vexillifera sp., Mayorella sp. (1) and Saccamoeba sp. (1) were found in all types of investigated waterbodies and possibly are eurytopic; 18 other species have a wide range of ecological valence. In the result of the cluster analysis based on Czekanowski-Serensen similarity index (table 2 and fig. 2), the largest share of joint species of naked amoebas was observed between rivers and floodplain lakes (0.81) whereas the least similarity in species compositions was observed between bogs and lakes (0.17). e-37 M. K. Patcyuk, I. V. Dovgal Fig. 1. Collecting sites (marked by black spots) of naked amoebas in the investigated region. Ðèñ. 1. Ïóíêòû ñáîðà ìàòåðèàëà (îòìå÷åíû ÷åðíûìè òî÷êàìè) ïî ãîëûì àìåáàì â ðåãèîíå èññëåäî- âàíèÿ. Unauthenticated Download Date | 11/27/16 8:17 PM e-38Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area Ta b l e 1. Distribution of the naked amoebas species throughout the different types of waterbodies in Ukrainian Polissya («+» – species presented, «-» – species absent) Ò à á ëèö à 1. Ðàñïðåäåëåíèå âèäîâ ãîëûõ àì¸á ïî òèïàì âîäî¸ìîâ Óêðàèíñêîãî Ïîëåñüÿ («+» – âèä ïðèñóòñòâóåò, «-» – âèä îòñóòñòâóåò) Species Type of waterbody river bog canal flood- plain lake Amoeba proteus Leidy, 1878 — — — — + Polychaos sp. — — — — + Deuteramoeba mycophaga Pussard, Alabouvette, Lemaitre et Pons, 1980 + — — + — Thecamoeba striata Penard, 1890 + + + + — Thecamoeba sphaeronucleolus (Greeff, 1891) Page, 1977 — — — — + Thecamoeba quadrilineata Carter, 1856 — — — + — Thecamoeba verrucosa (Echrenberg, 1838) Gläser, 1912 — — — + — Paradermamoeba levis Smirnov et Goodkov, 1994 + — — + — Paradermamoeba valamo Smirnov et Goodkov, 1993 + — — + — Stenamoeba stenopodia (Page, 1969) Smirnov, Nassonova, Chao et Cavalier-Smith, 2007 — + — + — Saccamoeba stagnicola Page, 1974 + — — + — Saccamoeba wakulla Bovee, 1972 — — — — + Saccamoeba sp. (1) + + + + + Saccamoeba sp. (2) + + — + — Saccamoeba sp. (3) + — — + + Mayorella penardi Page, 1972 — — — — + Mayorella vespertilioides Page, 1983 + — — + + Mayorella cantabrigiensis Page, 1983 + + — + — Mayorella viridis Leidy, 1874 — — — — + Mayorella sp. (1) + + + + + Mayorella sp. (2) + — — — — Korotnevella stella (Shaeffer, 1926) Goodkov, 1988 + — — + — Korotnevella diskophora Smirnov, 1999 — — — + — Korotnevella sp. (1) — — — + + Korotnevella sp. (2) — — — + + Vexillifera sp. + + + + + Vannella cf. lata Page, 1988 + + + + — Ripella playtpodia (Glaeser, 1912) Smirnov, Nassonova, Chao et Cavalier-Smith, 2007 — — — — + Ripella sp. — + — — — Flamella sp. + + + + — Rhizamoeba sp. (1) — + — — — Rhizamoeba sp. (2) — — — — + Vahlkampfia sp. (1) + + + + — Vahlkampfia sp. (2) + + + + — Willaertia sp. + — — — — Cochliopodium sp. (1) + + — + — Cochliopodium sp. (2) — — — — + Stygamoeba sp. — — — — + Pellita digitata (Greef, 1866) Smirnov et Kudryavtsev, 2004 — — — — + Arachnula impatiens Cienkowski, 1876 — — — — + Penardia mutabilis Cash, 1904 — — — — + To t a l 20 14 8 24 20 Unauthenticated Download Date | 11/27/16 8:17 PM The two complexes of amoeba species: limnetic (complex of Lakes of Shatsk) and associated with flood-lands were observed in investigated waterbodies (fig. 2). In the result of the cluster analysis based on Szymkievicz-Simpson index, which in contrast to Czekanowski-Serensen index has a weak dependence on the levels of knowl- edge on the biotopes (Pesenko, 1982) the similar consequences were obtained (table 2, fig. 3). The reliability of obtained results is good supports by Bootstrap analysis: the prob- abilities of main clusters (which corresponding to limnetic and floodplain specific com- plexes of naked amoebas) comprise 100 % for both indexes (fig. 2, 3). e-39 M. K. Patcyuk, I. V. Dovgal Fig. 2. The similarity between species compositions in different types of waterbodies regarding Czekanowski- Serensen index (in the nodes of dendrogram marked the probabilities of clusters (%) resulting Bootsrap ana - lysis with 1000 repositions). Ðèñ. 2. Ñõîäñòâî âèäîâîãî ñîñòàâà ãîëûõ àì¸á â âîäîåìàõ ðàçíûõ òèïîâ ïî èíäåêñó ×åêàíîâñêîãî- Ñåðåíñåíà (â óçëàõ äåíäðîãðàììû óêàçàíû âåðîÿòíîñòè êëàñòåðîâ (â %) ïî ðåçóëüòàòó Bootsrap-àíà- ëèçà ïðè 1000 ïåðåñòàíîâîê). 100 99 95 76 0 1 2 3 4 5 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 C h ek an ow sk i- S e re ns en 's in de x La ke Fl oo dp la in R iv er B og C an al Ta b l e 2. The similarity between species compositions in different types of waterbodies (over diagonal placed the values of Czekanowski-Serensen index and under diagonal placed the values of Szymkievicz-Simpson index) Òàáëèöà 2. Èíäåêñû ôàóíèñòè÷åñêîãî ñõîäñòâà ìåæäó âèäîâûìè êîìïëåêñàìè ãîëûõ àìåá âîäîåìîâ ðàçíûõ òèïîâ (íàä äèàãîíàëüþ çíà÷åíèÿ èíäåêñà ×åêàíîâñêîãî-Ñåðåíñåíà, ïîä äèàãîíàëüþ – çíà÷åíèÿ èíäåêñà Øèìêåâè÷à-Ñèìïñîíà) Type of waterbody Rriver Bog Canal Floodplain Lake River — 0.64 0.57 0.81 0.25 Bog 0.78 — 0.72 0.63 0.17 Canal 1.00 1.00 — 0.50 0.21 Floodplain 0.90 0.85 1.00 — 0.31 Lake 0.25 0.21 0.37 0.35 — Unauthenticated Download Date | 11/27/16 8:17 PM As noted above the species composition of naked amoebas in Lakes of Shatsk is enough specific (table 2, fig 2, 3). 12 above listed stenotopic species which were found only in these lakes (table 1) define the originality of the limnetic complex of naked amoebas species. This is most likely due to specific environmental conditions in the lakes. However, some species of naked amoebas recorded as stenotopic in this work are rare and scanty. For example, the frequency of occurrences of Amoeba proteus was 1.5 %, Polychaos sp. – 3 %, Thecamoeba sphaeronucleolus – 2 %, Saccamoeba wakulla 1.89 %, Mayorella penardi – 0.5 %, M. viridis – 1.21 %, Rhizamoeba sp. (2) – 2.98 %, Pellita digitata – 3.05 % and Ripella sð. – 3.2 % in contrast with the frequency of occurrences of Cochliopodium sp. (2) was 7.35 %, Stygamoeba sp. – 9.84 %, Arachnula impatiens and Penardia mutabilis – 6.45 % and Thecamoeba quadrilineata 7.3 %. When taken into account the species of naked amoebas found in several types of water bodies, most of them may be assigned to the complex of floodplain, which is possibly derived from the river fauna. Based on these data, the majority of naked amoebas in this region demonstrates the prevalence to living in a certain type of water body that possibly depend on the hydro- chemical and trophic parameters in these reservoirs. However, further studies is needed in particular on the influence of abiotic factors (such as temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen and dissolved organic matter) on gymnamoe- bas and their seasonal variation. e-40Biotopic Distribution of Naked Amoebas (Protista) in Ukrainian Polissya Area Fig. 3. The similarity between species compositions in different types of waterbodies regarding Szymkievicz- Simpson index (in the nodes of dendrogram marked the probabilities of clusters (%) resulting Bootsrap anal- ysis with 1000 repositions). Ðèñ. 3. Ñõîäñòâî âèäîâîãî ñîñòàâà ãîëûõ àì¸á â âîäîåìàõ ðàçíûõ òèïîâ ïî èíäåêñó Øèìêåâè÷à-Ñèìïñîíà (â óçëàõ äåíäðîãðàììû óêàçàíû âåðîÿòíîñòè êëàñòåðîâ (â %) ïî ðåçóëüòàòó Bootsrap-àíàëèçà ïðè 1000 ïåðå ñòàíîâîê). 100 99 40 96 0 1 2 3 4 5 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 S h ym ke vi ch -S im ps on 's in de x La ke B og C an al Fl oo dp la i n R iv er Unauthenticated Download Date | 11/27/16 8:17 PM The authors are greatly obliged to A. Goodkov, A. Smirnov, and L. Chistyakova (St. Petersburg, Russia) for advising on the methods of investigations and identification of naked amoebas, and V. Kharchenko (Kiev, Ukraine) for assistance with the use of the microscope Axio Imager M1. Adl S., Simpson A., Farmer M. et al. The new higher level classification of Eukaryotes with emphasis on the taxonomy of Protists // J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. – 2005. – 52, 5. – P. 399—432. Fenchel T. Ecology of Protozoa. The biology of free-living phagotrophic protists. – Berlin : Springer, 1987. – 197 p. Hammer Ø., Hurper D. A. T., Ryan P. D. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis // Paleontologica electronica. – 2001 – 4, 1. – P. 1—9. Konstantynov A. S. General hydrobiology. – Moscow : Vysshaya Shkola, 1986. – 472 p. – Russian : Êîíñòàíòèíîâ À. Ñ. Îáùàÿ ãèäðîáèîëîãèÿ. Page F. C. A new key to freshwater and soil gymnamoebae // Freshwater Biological Association. – Cumbria, Ambleside, 1988. – 122 p. Pesenko Yu. A. Principles and methods of qualitative analysis of faunistic investigations. – Moscow : Nauka, 1982. – 285 p. – Russian : Ïåñåíêî Þ. À. Ïðèíöèïû è ìåòîäû êîëè÷åñòâåííîãî àíàëèçà â ôàó- íèñòè÷åñêèõ èññëåäîâàíèÿõ. Romanenko V. D. Fundamentals of hydroecology. Kiev : Oberegy, 2001. – 728 p. – Ukrainian : Ðîìàíåíêî Â. Ä. Îñíîâè ã³äðîåêîëî㳿. Smirnov A., Goodkov A. An illustrated list of basic morphotypes of Gymnamoebia (Rhizopoda, Lobosea) // Protistology. – 1999. – 1. – P. 20—29. Smirnov A., Brown S. Guide to the methods of study and identification of soil gymnamoebas // Protistology. – 2004. – 3. – P. 148—190. Smirnov A., Nassonova E., Chao E., Cavalier-Smith T. Phylogeny, evolution and taxonomy of vannellid amoe- bae // Protist. – 2007. – 158. – P. 295—324. Smirnov A. Amoebas, Lobose // Encyclopedia of Microbiology/ Ed. M. Schaechter. – Oxford : Elsevier, 2008. – P. 558—577. e-41 M. K. Patcyuk, I. V. Dovgal Unauthenticated Download Date | 11/27/16 8:17 PM << /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (None) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (ISO Coated) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Error /CompatibilityLevel 1.3 /CompressObjects /Off /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages true /CreateJDFFile false /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Perceptual /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.1000 /ColorConversionStrategy /sRGB /DoThumbnails true /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 524288 /LockDistillerParams true /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness true /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments false /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts false /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Preserve /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages true /ColorImageMinResolution 150 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /ColorImageResolution 150 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 2.00000 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages false /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 150 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 150 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 2.00000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.15 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 600 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org?) /PDFXTrapped /False /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 /Description << /ENU (Versita Adobe Distiller Settings for Adobe Acrobat v6) /POL (Versita Adobe Distiller Settings for Adobe Acrobat v6) >> >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [2400 2400] /PageSize [2834.646 2834.646] >> setpagedevice