Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He

Resonance variations of the in-plane conductivity of surface electrons (SEs) over liquid ³He induced by microwave (MW) radiation of a fixed frequency are experimentally and theoretically studied for low temperature scattering regimes (T < 0.5 K). The system was tuned to resonance by varying the...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2008
Автори: Konstantinov, D., Monarkha, Y., Kono, K.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України 2008
Назва видання:Физика низких температур
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/116923
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He / D. Konstantinov, Y. Monarkha, K. Kono // Физика низких температур. — 2008. — Т. 34, № 4-5. — С. 470–479. — Бібліогр.: 24 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-116923
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1169232017-05-19T03:03:03Z Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He Konstantinov, D. Monarkha, Y. Kono, K. Электроны над жидким гелием Resonance variations of the in-plane conductivity of surface electrons (SEs) over liquid ³He induced by microwave (MW) radiation of a fixed frequency are experimentally and theoretically studied for low temperature scattering regimes (T < 0.5 K). The system was tuned to resonance by varying the amplitude of the vertical electric field which shifts the positions of SE Rydberg levels. The line-shape change and reversing of the sign of the effect are found to be opposite to that reported previously for weak vertical electric fields. A theoretical analysis of conductivity of the SE system heated due to decay of electrons excited to the second Rydberg level by the MW explains well the line-shape variations observed. It shows also that shifting the MW resonance into the range of weak vertical fields leads to important qualitative changes in the line-shape of SE conductivity which are in agreement with observations reported previously. 2008 Article Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He / D. Konstantinov, Y. Monarkha, K. Kono // Физика низких температур. — 2008. — Т. 34, № 4-5. — С. 470–479. — Бібліогр.: 24 назв. — англ. 0132-6414 PACS: 67.90.+z;73.20.–r;73.25.+i;78.70.Gq http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/116923 en Физика низких температур Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic Электроны над жидким гелием
Электроны над жидким гелием
spellingShingle Электроны над жидким гелием
Электроны над жидким гелием
Konstantinov, D.
Monarkha, Y.
Kono, K.
Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He
Физика низких температур
description Resonance variations of the in-plane conductivity of surface electrons (SEs) over liquid ³He induced by microwave (MW) radiation of a fixed frequency are experimentally and theoretically studied for low temperature scattering regimes (T < 0.5 K). The system was tuned to resonance by varying the amplitude of the vertical electric field which shifts the positions of SE Rydberg levels. The line-shape change and reversing of the sign of the effect are found to be opposite to that reported previously for weak vertical electric fields. A theoretical analysis of conductivity of the SE system heated due to decay of electrons excited to the second Rydberg level by the MW explains well the line-shape variations observed. It shows also that shifting the MW resonance into the range of weak vertical fields leads to important qualitative changes in the line-shape of SE conductivity which are in agreement with observations reported previously.
format Article
author Konstantinov, D.
Monarkha, Y.
Kono, K.
author_facet Konstantinov, D.
Monarkha, Y.
Kono, K.
author_sort Konstantinov, D.
title Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He
title_short Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He
title_full Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He
title_fullStr Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He
title_full_unstemmed Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He
title_sort photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³he
publisher Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
publishDate 2008
topic_facet Электроны над жидким гелием
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/116923
citation_txt Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid ³He / D. Konstantinov, Y. Monarkha, K. Kono // Физика низких температур. — 2008. — Т. 34, № 4-5. — С. 470–479. — Бібліогр.: 24 назв. — англ.
series Физика низких температур
work_keys_str_mv AT konstantinovd photoresonanceandconductivityofsurfaceelectronsonliquid3he
AT monarkhay photoresonanceandconductivityofsurfaceelectronsonliquid3he
AT konok photoresonanceandconductivityofsurfaceelectronsonliquid3he
first_indexed 2025-07-08T11:19:30Z
last_indexed 2025-07-08T11:19:30Z
_version_ 1837077439197478912
fulltext Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5, p. 470–479 Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid 3He Denis Konstantinov1, Yuriy Monarkha1,2, and Kimitoshi Kono1 1 Low Temperature Physics Laboratory, RIKEN, Hirosawa 2-1, Wako 351-0198, Japan 2 B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 47 Lenin Ave., Kharkov 61103, Ukraine E-mail: konstantinov@riken.jp Received October 26, 2007 Resonance variations of the in-plane conductivity of surface electrons (SEs) over liquid 3 He induced by microwave (MW) radiation of a fixed frequency are experimentally and theoretically studied for low tem- perature scattering regimes (T � 0.5 K). The system was tuned to resonance by varying the amplitude of the vertical electric field which shifts the positions of SE Rydberg levels. The line-shape change and reversing of the sign of the effect are found to be opposite to that reported previously for weak vertical electric fields. A theoretical analysis of conductivity of the SE system heated due to decay of electrons excited to the sec- ond Rydberg level by the MW explains well the line-shape variations observed. It shows also that shifting the MW resonance into the range of weak vertical fields leads to important qualitative changes in the line-shape of SE conductivity which are in agreement with observations reported previously. PACS: 67.90.+z Other topics in quantum fluids and solids; liquid and solid helium; 73.20.–r Electron states at surfaces and interfaces; 73.25.+ i Surface conductivity and carrier phenomena; 78.70.Gq Microwave and radio-frequency interactions. Keywords: liquid helium, surface electrons, microwave, resonance, conductivity. Introduction Surface electron (SE) states on liquid helium [1,2] are formed owing to the interplay between an attractive im- age potential acting above the surface, V z zimg ( ) /� �� , and a very high repulsion barrier V0 1� eV appearing at the interface (z � 0 ). The image potential is very weak be- cause � � � �e 2 1 4 1( ) / ( )� � and the dielectric constant of liquid helium � is uniquely close to 1 (� �1 0 057� . for liquid 4He, and � �1 0 043� . for liquid 3He). In an approxi- mation V0 � , SE energy levels are spaced similarly to Rydberg levels of a Hydrogen atom: l R l� � / 2, where l �12, , ..., and R is the corresponding Rydberg energy which are about 7.6 K for liquid 4He and about 4.2 K for liquid 3He. The effective Bohr radius of SE Rydberg states a mB e� � 2 / � is about two orders of magnitude larger than the conventional Bohr radius, which makes these states insensitive to small surface distortions. Therefore, at low temperatures, liquid helium provides a remarkable opportunity to study a very clean two-dimen- sional system of highly correlated electrons. The SE Rydberg states and a Stark effect in the vertical electric filed E� were first observed by Grimes and Brown [3] in a microwave (MW) resonance absorption experiment. If Coulomb interaction is disregarded, SE motion along the interface can be described by the free electron spectrum � k ek m� � 2 2 2/ , where k is a two-dimensional wave-vector. At typical helium temperatures, electron in- teractions with vapor atoms and capillary wave quanta (ripplons) are weak enough to be treated in terms of elec- tron scattering which limits SEs conductivity along the interface. For liquid 4He (3He), scattering by vapor atoms dominates at T � 1K (0.5 K), while at lower temperatures T � 0 5. K (0.3 K) SEs are mostly scattered by ripplons whose wave vectors q k 2 are much smaller than typical wave-vectors of thermal ripplons. The ripplon-limited conductivity was observed by measuring the power ab- sorption in a parallel AC electric field [4], the plasmon resonance [5] and cyclotron resonance (CR) [6] broadening. © Denis Konstantinov, Yuriy Monarkha, and Kimitoshi Kono, 2008 Combined photoresonance and mobility measure- ments [7] were performed as an interesting indirect probe of SE Rydberg states. These measurements had shown that in the case of liquid 3He at T � 0 35. K, electron mobil- ity decreases at the MW resonance for low powers, but the effect changes the sign for higher powers. The reduction in electron conductivity was attributed to electron-vapor atom scattering, even though this explanation was in con- tradiction with results of similar quantum CR measure- ments [6] which display an increase in SE conductivity. Of course, the comparison with quantum CR data could be misleading because in the presence of a strong mag- netic field SE conductivity is affected by the many-elec- tron effect which can lead to a substantial narrowing of the CR [8,9]. Recent conductivity measurements for SEs exposed to resonant MW radiation above liquid 3He in the vapor atom scattering regime [10] indicate that heating of the electron system is the key occurrence of a MW resonance experiment with SEs. This heating occurs because of electron decay from the excited Rydberg level to the ground level induced by interaction with vapor atoms. Because the mass of a helium atom M is much larger than the free electron mass me , the energy difference between the two levels is not given out but is transferred to the ki- netic energy of electron motion along the interface. Under the resonance condition the effective electron tempera- ture Te can be much higher than the ambient temperature T . Such decay heating of SEs appears already at very low excitation rates affecting electron conductivity [10] and the MW resonance linewidth [11]. The important point is that in the vapor atom scattering regime, SE conductivity at the MW resonance steadily decreases with power, and there is no the sign change of this effect at high excitation powers similar to that reported previously [7]. At high powers, there is only saturation of the conductivity de- crease caused by the quantum saturation of the fractional occupancy of the first excited level n2 approaching that of the ground level n1. Therefore new studies of SE conduc- tivity affected by photoresonance are necessary for un- derstanding these interesting phenomena. An additional interest in such studies is evoked by a possible use of elec- trons occupying the two lowest SE Rydberg levels as electronic qubits controlled by MW radiation (for a recent review of this problem, see Ref. 12). In this work we report the results of experimental and theoretical investigations of SE conductivity changes in- duced by MW resonance excitation for liquid 3He in a low temperature range (T � 0 5. K) covering both vapor atom and ripplon scattering regimes. At T � 0.35 K and low MW powers, we observed an increase in mobility of SEs which is opposite to the result reported previously [7]. This discrepancy is explained by our theoretical analysis, which indicates that experimental results obtained at T � 0 35. K can be understood only if electron–ripplon in- teraction is taken into account. We found that the sign of the conductivity change induced by the photoresonance crucially depends on the range of the vertical (holding) electric fields E� used for tuning of the resonant fre- quency. For weak holding fields, E� � 3 V/cm, corre- sponding to the conditions of Ref. 7, conductivity indeed decreases at the MW resonance, if the excitation power is low. For holding fields used in our measurements, E� � 93 V/cm, in the same power range, decay heating leads to the opposite effect — SE conductivity limited by ripplons increases at the photoresonance. Because the conductivity changes induced by MW radiation occur un- der conditions of the linear transport regime, such hot electrons could be used for probing the electron coupling with surface excitations of Fermi-liquid 3He. 2. Experiment Since DC current measurements are practically impos- sible for SEs on liquid helium, the capacitive detection method is frequently used for measuring conductivity [13,14]. In magnetoconductivity studies, this method em- ploys an electrode array in the form of a Corbino disk usu- ally placed below the helium surface. In our case, the Corbino electrodes were placed above the surface, as in- dicated in Fig. 1. A positive voltage VB was applied to the bottom electrode to hold electrons. The parallel metal electrodes were separated by 2 6 01. .� mm. To confine electrons laterally, each electrode was surrounded by a guard ring charged negatively (not shown in Fig. 1). To improve the heat contact between liquid 3He and the cell body, the bottom part of the cell contained a sintered sil- ver heat exchanger. The cell was placed inside of the superconducting magnet to create magnetic field B di- rected perpendicular to the helium surface. One electrode of the Corbino array was driven with an AC voltage in- Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid 3He Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5 471 d e3 He VIN IOUT a b c VB Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of the experimental setup: micro- wave waveguides (a), Corbino electrodes (b), surface electrons (c), bottom electrode (d), heat exchanger (e). ducing a current in the electron layer. The measured cur- rent was analyzed by means of the transmission line mo- del, which allows to extract � xx data using a conventional relationship [15]. In the cell, electrons were accumulated on the va- por-liquid 3He interface placed in the middle between the parallel metal electrodes. At typical helium temperatures, practically all electrons occupy the ground surface level ( l �1). In our measurements the areal electron density ns � � �17 10 7 2. cm . To excite electrons to the second sur- face level (l � 2), MW radiation of a fixed frequency ( /� �2 130� GHz) was arranged to be passing through the cell, as shown in Fig. 1 . Owing to the Stark effect, the SE system was tuned in resonance with MW radiation by varying the holding electric field E� . A constant mag- netic field was applied, and the Corbino signal was re- corded as E� was swept through the resonance. In order to avoid complications with many electron effects affect- ing quantum magnetotransport of SEs on liquid helium, we employed only a weak magnetic field for which the magnetoconductivity can be described by the classical Drude equation � � � � xx s e c e n m � � 2 2 2 , (1) where �c is the cyclotron frequency, and � is the collision frequency describing momentum relaxation of SEs. For example, at T � 0.35 K, the magnetic field B was about 233 G which is within the semi-classical transport regime (��c T�� ). Of course, the frequency � of the AC voltage VIN is too much lower than �c and � to be taken into ac- count in the Drude eqbation. Extracting � from the magnetoconductivity data we can judge of the DC con- ductivity of SEs in the absence of the magnetic field � �� e n ms e 2 / and compare its variations induced by MW with the old results of Ref. 7. The MW resonance itself can be described by the usual Lorentzian form determining the stimulated absorption (emission) rate [16] r E 12 2 2 21 2 0 5 � � � � . [ ( )] � � � � � , (2) where �21 2 1� �( ) / � is the resonant frequency de- pending on the holding electric field, � is the half-width calculated previously in Ref. 17, � � � �eE zMW 1 2| | / � is the Rabi frequency, EMW is the MW field amplitude, � �1 2| |z is the electric dipole length for the transition. For low excitation, the energy absorbed from the MW field is proportional to ��21 12r . Since � ��� 21, the excitation rate and energy absorption as functions of E� have a sharp resonance structure when �21( )E� is close to the MW frequency �. Variations in electron collision frequency �( )E� ob- tained from our magnetoconductivity data, as described above, are shown in Fig. 2. At T � 0 48. K, the electron col- lision frequency has a typical resonance structure with a maximum positioned at E� � 93 V/cm. Thus, under the condition, the MW resonance excitation leads to a de- crease in SE conductivity, as expected for the vapor atom scattering regime [10]. In this case, the increase in the col- lision rate is caused by decay heating of SEs and their oc- cupation of higher surface levels, where the inter-level collision rate is high. The recording signal greatly changes, if the ambient temperature T � 0 35. K which corresponds to the condi- tions and results of Ref. 7 discussed in the Introduction. The most important conclusion which comes out from Fig. 2 for this case is that MW radiation leads to an in- crease in conductivity (� �� e n ms 2 / ) at low powers. This is opposite to the result of Ref. 7. The resonance line in 472 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5 Denis Konstantinov, Yuriy Monarkha, and Kimitoshi Kono 18 17 16 15 88 90 92 94 96 98 88 90 92 94 96 98 88 90 92 94 96 98 T = 0.48 K T = 0.35 K T = 0.3 K 2.45 2.40 2.35 2.30 2.25 2.20 1.40 1.35 1.30 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.10 E , V/cm� �, 1 0 s 8 – 1 �, 1 0 s 8 – 1 �, 1 0 s 8 – 1 Fig. 2. Variations of the effective collision frequency with E� induced by MW radiation and measured at three typical ambi- ent temperatures. not of the Lorentzian shape and the effect changes the sigh as E� approaching the resonance value. It is clear that the sign change of the effect is due to the contribution from vapor atom scattering. Therefore, the conductivity increase in the region of resonance tails is, obviously, due to electron–ripplon scattering. This conclusion is con- firmed also by the data obtained at T � 0.3 K, when vapor atom scattering is substantially reduced. For such condi- tions, the dependence �( )E� has a usual resonance shape, but the sign of its variations with E� is opposite to that obtained in the vapor atom scattering regime (T � 0 48. K). Scattering by vapor atoms only slightly affects the reso- nance curve near its minimum. Since our new low temper- ature data conflict with the data reported in Ref. 7, the situation should be clarified by an appropriate theoretical analysis. 3. Theory 3.1. Decay heating For the vapor atom scattering regime, it is proven that even a very small fraction of SE excited by the MW from the first to the second surface level can substantially heat the entire electron system [10,18]. This happens because the decay rate of electrons occupying the second surface level � 21 1� is determined mostly by electron interaction with heavy vapor atoms. Therefore, a return of an elec- tron back to the ground level is accompanied by a very small energy exchange between an electron and a vapor atom. Thus, practically all the excitation energy 21 (here and below ll l l� �� � ) is transferred to the kinetic en- ergy of electron motion along the interface which is even- tually redistributed between other electrons because of electron–electron collisions. At the same time, the energy relaxation rate ~� for electron–atom scattering is much lower than the decay rate of the first excited level � 21 1� . This leads to a strong increase in electron temperature even at very low excitation rates r12 21 310� � � . Determination of electron temperature requires the knowledge of the electron energy relaxation rate due to interaction with scatterers for arbitrary level occupancies. Decay heating leads to electron occupation of higher sur- face levels, therefore outer levels (l � 2) cannot be disre- garded in the expression for the energy relaxation rate [18] ~ exp [ (| | ) / ]( ) , � �a e a l l l l l l l e m M n T� � � � � � ��0 2 � � � � � �� � !! " # $ % & '� � � R e l l l l e l l T u T s | | 2 , (3) where R e Bm a� � 2 22/ , and n N Nl l e� / are fractional occupancies of surface levels. We used �a e a am n V B ( )0 2 3 11 � � , s B B B dz f z f zl l l l l l l l� � � � �� � (11 1 0 2, [ ( ) ( )] , (4) u a B C C dz d dz f z f zl l B l l l l l l� � � � �� � ) * + , - .( 2 11 1 0 , [ ( ) ( )] 2 , (5) where na is the density of vapor atoms, f zl ( ) are electron wavefunctions describing surface states, Va is the ampli- tude of the pseudo-potential Va e a/( )R R� frequently used for description of the electron-atom interaction, and �a ( )0 is the momentum relaxation rate of SEs for scattering within the ground surface level (l l� � �1). In terms of ~�a the power transfer can be written as ( )~ ( )T T Te a e� � . For electron–ripplon scattering, energy relaxation is much more complicated. Scattering processes which in- volve only one ripplon also can be considered as quasi-elastic, because the energy exchange ��q is very small for q k 2 . Energy relaxation is much more effec- tive, when electrons emit couples of shortwave ripplons with small total wave vectors (| |q + q� �� q) [19]. In this case, the energy exchange 2��q at a scattering event is of the order of Te and the energy transfer rate to the environ- ment increases by about two orders of magnitude. Be- cause of the strong repulsion barrier existing at the inter- face V0, the largest contribution to the energy relaxation rate is given from the nonlinear interaction term [2] V z V z e int ( ) ( ) ( , ) ( ) 2 2 0 2 21 2 r r� 0 0 1 , (6) where Ve ( )0 is the electron potential for the flat interface, and 1( )r is the surface displacement operator. The matrix elements of V int ( )2 describe two-ripplon scattering proba- bilities already in the second order of the perturbation theory. The matrix elements g V zll e ll� �2 0 00 5 2 0 2. ( / )( ) [here ( )� ll� means � � �l l| |� ] can be expressed in terms of the derivative of the electronic wave functions �f zl ( ) at the helium surface (z � 0) calculated in the approximation V0 � . This results in g V f f z z ll l l ll l � � �� � � 0 0 � � � � ! 0 0 � � � � !� 0 0 1 00 03 3( ) ( ) v v � �l , (7) where 30 1 02� � � / m Ve is the penetration depth of the electron wavefunction into liquid, and v( ) /z z� � �� � �eE z. Since ( / )0 0v z ll is finite in the limiting case V0 � , the matrix elements g Vll� 4 0 . Following the previously described procedure [20], the energy loss of SEs per unit time can be presented in Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid 3He Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5 473 the conventional form � ~ ( )( )� � � �N T T Te r e e�2 with the energy relaxation rate defined as ~ ( ) | | ( )� �5 �2 2 2 0 3 2 2 1r e l l ll l q q m T T g n dq q N� � � � � � � ( � � � � " # $ % & ' ) * 6 +6 , - 6 .6 �� �1 2n n T T T T Tl l l l e q e eexp ( ) �� � � � � �" # $ % & ' � � exp | | l l q l l q eT 2 2 2 � �� � , (8) where N q is the ripplon distribution function and 5 is the liquid helium mass density. A detailed analysis of Eq. (8) indicates that this expression is positive. For the Boltzmann distribution of level occupancies nl and l l� � �1, this expression transforms into the result ob- tained in Ref. 20. Equation (8) shows that for two-ripplon emission within the surface levels (l l� � ), typical ripplons contrib- uted to ~�2r belong to the short wavelength range 2��q eT� . In the case of liquid 3He, the behavior of the surface excitation spectrum in this range is unknown. It is not known also how the strong damping of ripplons ex- pected at low temperatures affects the scattering probabil- ities. Anyway, experimental data indicate that the strong damping of capillary waves does not affect much one-ripplon scattering probabilities which determine the momentum relaxation of SEs. Therefore, in our numerical evaluations of ~�2r we shall disregard damping effects and assume that even in the short wavelength range the ripplon spectrum coincides with the capillary wave asymptote � 7 5q q� / /3 2. The electron temperature is determined by the energy balance equation ( ) ( )~( )n n r T T Te e1 2 21 12� � � � , (9) where ~( )� Te is the total energy relaxation rate due to va- por atoms and ripplons. At the same time, fractional occu- pancies nl should be obtained from the rate equations dn dtl / � 0 which ensure the balance between electron transition to and from surface levels caused by scatterers and the MW field. In the case of electron-vapor atom in- teraction, scattering frequencies which enter the rate equations for level occupancies have a very simple form w s T l l a a ll l l l l e� � � � �� � �( ) ( ) [ (| | ) / ]� 0 2exp . (10) For transitions down the surface levels (l l� �and l l� � 0), the scattering rate w l l a � � ( ) does not depend on Te , while for scattering up (l l� �, l l� � 0), the scattering rate w l l a � � ( ) ac- quires an additional exponential factor e � � l l eT/ . If electron–ripplon scattering dominates, at T � 01. K, the scattering frequencies are determined mostly by one-ripplon processes. Collecting corresponding proba- bilities found in the framework of the usual perturbation treatment, the scattering rates can be presented in the following form w T T d l U l l l r e q q q q� � � � � � �(( ) | | | | 1 0 2 4 �7 � � �� � � � �exp [ ( ) / ( )]� �q l l q eT 2 4 , (11) where � q eq m� � 2 2 2/ . The matrix elements of the elect- ron–ripplon couplingU q can be written as [2] � � � �l U z lq| ( )| � �� �( )eE Fq ll ll , where eE z q qz K qz qz q ( ) ( ) ( ) � � " # $ $ % & ' ' � 2 2 11 , (12) F eEll ll ll� � � �� �/ 8 , 8 ll e ll e l l V z m f f z � � �� � 0 0 � � � � � ! ! � � � � 0 0 �( ) ( ) ( ) 0 2 2 0 0 � v � � � ! �ll , (13) and K x1( ) is the modified Bessel function of the second kind. It is obvious that w w T l l r l l r ll e�� � � �� �( ) ( ) exp ( / ) 1 1 . Since 8 ll � 0, diagonal matrix elements of U q are deter- mined only by the holding field term eE� and the term eEq which originates from the polarization interaction with oscillating liquid. For off-diagonal terms, 8 ll� sub- stitutes the holding field term which turns to zero. At T � 0.1 K, the decay rate of excited SE states is de- termined mostly by quasielastic one-ripplon scattering, while the energy relaxation is mostly due to inelastic two-ripplon scattering discussed above. Electron scatter- ing induced by one-ripplon processes limits the lifetime of the first excited Rydberg level and transfers the energy difference 21 into the kinetic energy of electron motion along the interface. Then electron–electron collisions which have the highest rate redistribute it among other electrons forming a nondegenerate distribution of the in-plane momentum with an effective electron tempera- ture T Te � . With much lower rate (about 10 6 s–1) all the electrons transfer the energy to the environment emitting couples of short wavelength ripplons. Therefore, decay heating of SEs at the MW resonance is expected in the ripplon scattering regime as well. At much lower temper- atures, the one-ripplon contribution to the decay rate of excited surface levels freezes out and one have to take into account two-ripplon emission processes [21] which start to limit the lifetime of excited surface levels. Still, this limiting case, which requires a separate examination, is beyond the conditions of the experiments discussed above. To obtain the electron temperature at the MW reso- nance (� �� 21 ) as a function of the Rabi frequency, we 474 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5 Denis Konstantinov, Yuriy Monarkha, and Kimitoshi Kono found numerical solutions of the energy balance equation and the rate equations for nl under different experimental conditions. Typical dependence Te ( )� at the resonance maximum is shown in Fig. 3. In these calculations, the wave functions of the first 10 levels were obtained by means of numerical solution of the corresponding Schrodinger equation, while the next 190 levels were ap- proximately described by Airy functions. At the begin- ning, with an increase in the Rabi frequency, Te increases fast. Then, at high excitations (r12 21 1� � ), electron tem- perature saturates due to the saturation of the level occu- pancy of the first excited level n n2 1� . Figure 3 indi- cates that electron temperatures of about 10 K can be reached at the saturation condition. For a fixed �, elec- t ron tempera ture decreases wi th | ( )|� �� �21 E in accordance with Eq. (2), because it reduces the excitation rate r12. 3.2. Conductivity of hot electrons It is clear that decay heating of SEs is a very important effect induced by the MW resonance. In the vicinity of the resonance one can have ultra-hot electrons covering the cold surface of liquid helium (T Te �� ). For weak driving electric fields, conductivity of such hot electrons can be described by the linear transport theory. Additionally, in this system, electron–electron collisions are usually much higher than other relaxation rates which allows us to sim- plify the conductivity treatment. To obtain the effective collision frequency �which enters the Drude conductivity equation we can just evaluate the kinetic friction acting on the whole electron system, assuming that in the mov- ing reference frame, the electron liquid can be described by the equilibrium dynamical structure factor [2]. Gener- a l ly, the kinet ic f r ic t ion can be represented as F Vfric � �N me e a� v , where Vav is the average velocity. For the vapor atom scattering regime, the effective col- lision frequency which determines DC conductivity ( / )� �� e n ms e 2 has a simple form [18] � �( ) ( ) , exp | |a a l l l l l l l l l e s n T � � �� � �� � !!� � � ��0 2 1 2 � �" # $ % & ' � �| | l l l l eT . (14) There are two important factors which cause changes in � ( )a , if SE are heated. The first factor is the electron occu- pation of high surface levels which increases inter-level scattering and the momentum relaxation rate � ( )a . The second factor is a decrease in matrix elements sl l� with level numbers which acts in the opposite way. It is re- markable that the outcome of the competition of these two factors strongly depends on the holding electric field. For typical holding fields used in our experiments (E� �100 V/cm), the first factor dominates and the eff- ective collision frequency � ( )a increases with � with- out an observable sign of a decrease [10]. Nevertheless, our new calculations conducted for weak holding fields ( .E� � 315 V/cm) related to the experiment of Ref. 7 re- sults in a more complicated behavior of � ( )( )a � shown in Fig. 4. At low powers, � ( )a decreases with the MW exci- tation by about 4%, and then we have the sign change of the effect. This decrease is induced by the reduction in matrix elements sl l� whose magnitude depends strongly on E� . Thus, for weak holding fields scattering by vapor atoms should be reduced by MW radiation at low powers, which is opposite to the mobility decrease at the pho- toresonance reported previously [7]. This means that va- por atom scattering cannot be the origin of that mobility decrease. The ripplon contribution to the momentum collision frequency of SEs can be obtained similarly to Eq. (11) Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid 3He Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5 475 10 1 T , K e T = 0.35 K 10 –5 10 –4 10 –3 10 –2 10 –1 10 0 �, GHz Fig. 3. Electron temperature at the MW resonance vs the Rabi frequency calculated for T � 035. K and E� � 93 V/cm. 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 10 –3 10 –2 10 –1 10 1 10 0 �, GHz v, 1 0 s 9 – 1 T = 0.5 K , E = 3.15 V/cm� Fig. 4. Collision frequency at the MW resonance vs the Rabi frequency calculated for the vapor atom scattering regime. � �7 � � ( ) | | ( )| |r e l l q q l q e T T n d l U z l� � � � �� ( � �4 0 2 � � � � �" # $ $ % & ' ' � �( ) exp ( )� � � � q l l q e q l l q eT T 4 4 2 . (15) The additional factor of the integrand containing ( )� q l l� � originates from the factor qk which usually en- ters the equation for the momentum relaxation rate. In our evaluations of matrix elements � � �l U z lq e| ( )| , we shall use the variational form of SE wave functions f zl ( ) � � �A zP z b zl l l( ) exp [ / ]2 , where Al is the normalization constant, P zl ( ) is a polynomial of power l �1. We shall use also the following notations b b bll l l� �� �( ) / 2. To understand the origin of strange variations in � ( )r induced by decay heating, it is convenient to rearrange the collision rate of electrons using the specific form of elec- tron-ripplon coupling and the Boltzmann approximation for fractional occupancies n nl l B� ( ) . The later works well for low and medium excitations and fails under the satura- tion condition [18]. In this approximation, using � ( )r � � � l l B l r n ( ) ( )� , we introduce the collision frequency of electrons occupying a level l, � 7l r e ll l l l l l e T T F T ( ) exp | | � � �" # $ % & ' �� � � ��4 2 2 � � � �" # $ $ % & ' ' � � �(�4 4 2 1 2 0 2TT a x x T x e B l l l e �7� / exp ( / ) � � " # $ $ % & '� � � � � xW x T F a T W x T ll e b ll B e ll e bll ll 2 4 2 4 ( ) ( ) � � ' dx, (16) where functions W yll� ( ) are defined by W y A A b x P x b P x bll l l ll l ll l ll� � � � � �� �(( ) exp ( ) ( / ) ( / ) 2 3 0 � � � " # $ $ % & ' ' 1 1 y x K x y y dx ( ) , (17) and � bll � is defined similar to � q with bll� standing for q. Usually, low temperature asymptotes of W yll� ( ) valid for y �� 1 are used for specific evaluations, such as mobility calculations [22] and the nonlinear conductivity studies [23]. For example, in this approximation, W y11( ) � � 0 5 4 1. ln ( / )y � . In our treatment of hot electrons, we cannot restrict ourselves to this approximation because 4Te can be of the order of � bll � . In spite of the cumbersome form of Eq. (16), the main features of � l r( ) can be seen quite easily. In contrast with � 0 ( )a , the electron–ripplon collision frequency for elec- tron scattering within the ground level depends strongly on Te . For l l� � �1, the first term of Eq. (16), representing the holding field term eE� of U q , decreases with elect- ron temperature as Te �1. The second term of Eq. (16) has a more complicated dependence on Te . Nevertheless, it is quite clear that for warm SEs the term whose integrand containsWll� 2 increases with electron temperature approxi- mately as T Te b eln ( / )2 1 � , because the low temperature asymptote ofW y11( ) given above has only logarithmic de- pendence on y. At higher Te , when 4 1 1 � b eT/ � , we can simplify W y y11 1 3( ) /9 and the second term becomes approximately independent of Te . With further increase in Te , when the argument ofW11 becomes large, even this term start decreasing with electron temperature. Thus, we conclude that the integral effect of decay heating on � ( )r depends strongly on the magnitude of the holding electric field E� . For zero or a weak value of E� , the collision rate starts to increase with warming of SEs, then attains a maximum and starts to decrease. If the holding field is sufficiently strong, the collision rate decreases with heat- ing even for warm SEs (Te � T). 4. Results and discussions The momentum collision rate � ( )r given by Eqs. (15) and (16) has a very complicated form, which is not conve- nient for evaluations when many surface levels should be taken into account. In this case, there are two options: one can simplify the electron–ripplon coupling, or take into account only a very restricted number of surface levels. In this work, we consider only 1 and 3-level models with the exact form of U q . The wave functions of surface levels are found according to the conventional variational principle. For electron–vapor atom scattering, the momentum re- laxation rate given in Eq. (14) is much more simple, and, therefore, it can be evaluated for a large number of sur- face levels sufficient for the convergence of the result, if we approximate higher levels (l � 3) by the corresponding Airy functions. This allows us to take into account up to 400 surface levels. The chosen approximation is expected to describe well the conductivity of hot SEs for strong holding fields (E� � 100 V/cm). For weak holding fields, it can describe well only the conductivity of warm and not very much heated electrons (Te � 2 K). The numerical evaluations of � ( )( )a eT and � ( )( )r eT support the qualitative analysis of the momentum relax- ation rate given at the end of preceding Section. Since the MW power used in our experiments is much lower than that providing the electron temperature saturation, we ex- pect that the Boltzmann distribution of level occupancies is a reasonable approximation for evaluation of � ( )( )r eT . For the conditions of the experiment of Ref. 7 (E� � = 3.15 V/cm, T � 0.35 K), the effective collision fre- quency calculated employing different models is shown 476 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5 Denis Konstantinov, Yuriy Monarkha, and Kimitoshi Kono in Fig. 5. Though, at T Te � , the electron–ripplon colli- sion rate is substantially lower than that induced by vapor atoms, it depends on electron temperature even at low MW powers, where � ( )a is approximately constant. Cal- culations conducted for the 1-level model result in a rapid increase in � ( )r with Te (dotted line), which turns into a slow decrease at Te � 13. K. Taking into account more surface levels affects mostly the decreasing part of the dependence � ( )( )r eT which be- comes sharper as shown by the dash-dotted line. The total collision frequency � � �� �( ) ( )a r of the 3-level model as a function of Te preserves the conductivity maximum (dash-dot-dotted line) and decreases strongly at Te � 1 K. Even the inclusion of 400 levels in calculations of � ( )a (solid line) does not affect the maximum of the total colli- sion frequency (here the contribution � ( )( )r eT is still cal- culated for the 3-level model). The above given theoretical results explain the mobil- ity decrease at the photoresonance previously observed for low powers [7]. Even numerically, the change in the collision frequency at the maximum which is about 3% (Fig. 5) agrees well with typical changes of SE mobility observed in the experiment. Regarding the reversing of the sign of the effect observed at high powers, it agrees with the 3-level model considered here (dash-dot-dotted line), though this model cannot be applied for Te � 12. K. Therefore, this property should be verified by an all-level treatment which is very difficult for such a weak holding electric field. The existence of the collision frequency maximum at Te � 0 88. K leads to a complication of the shape of the conductivity resonance (�( )E� ) induced by MW radiation of intermediate powers, which also agrees with observations [7]. In our experiments, the holding electric field is much stronger than that used in Ref. 7: E� � 93 V/cm. For such a field, at Te � 0 48. K, scattering by vapor atoms is domi- nant, and, as shown previously [10,18], the correspond- ing collision frequency of SEs increases steadily with heating. The experimental data relevant to this tempera- ture and shown by the first data line of Fig. 2 are consis- tent with this conclusion. The photoresonance decreases the conductivity of SEs. For the ambient temperature T � 0 35. K, the depend- ence �( )Te becomes completely different, as indicated in Fig. 6. At first, consider the contribution from the electron–ripplon scattering only (lines R). For the models of the SE system analyzed here, the momentum collision frequency � ( )r mostly decreases with heating. The pla- teau feature which is seen for the 3-level model at T2 2� K remains remarkably even in models taking into account larger numbers of surface levels which we do not discuss in this publication. At the same time, the contribution from vapor atoms (line A) calculated for the all-level treatment increases steadily with Te . Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid 3He Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5 477 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 1 2 3 4 5 T , Ke Total 3LA R 1L 3L T = 0.35 K , E = 3.15 V/cm�� � (T )/ (T ) e Fig. 5. Momentum collision frequency vs Te normalized by �( ) .T � 152 108� s –1 : contribution from scattering by ripplons (R) for 1-level (1L dotted line) and 3-level (3L dash-dotted line) models, contribution from vapor atoms (A) obtained in an all-level treatment, total �( )Te for the 3-level model (dash-dot- dotted line) and for the all-level treatment of vapor–atom scat- tering as described in the text (solid line). 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 T , Ke Total 3L A R 1L 3L T = 0.35 K , E = 93 V/cm� 2 4 6 8 10 � � (T )/ (T ) e Fig. 6. Momentum collision frequency vs Te calculated at E� � 93 V/cm and T � 035. K: contribution from scattering by ripplons (R) for 1-level (1L dotted line), and 3-level (3L dash- dotted line) models, contribution from vapor atoms (A) obtain- ed in an all-level treatment, total � � �� �( ) ( )a r for the 3-level model (dash-dot-dotted line) and for the all-level treatment of vapor-atom scattering (solid line) as described in the text. For the total collision frequency shown by the solid line, the contribution � ( )a was calculated using the all-level treatment, while � ( )r was taken from the 3-level analysis, as described above. Thus, instead of the maxi- mum found above for E� � 315. V/cm, we have a mini- mum of the momentum relaxation rate. This minimum af- fects the shape of the conductivity resonance induced by the MW in the way which agrees with the corresponding data shown in Fig. 2. Even numerically, the decrease in � at the minimum is about 12% which is close to that ob- tained in our measurements. At high electron tempera- tures, we have a reversing of the sign of the effect which is opposite to that previously observed for the weak hold- ing field: at low MW excitation powers, SE mobility in- creases with Te , while at high powers it decreases. At even lower T � 0 3. K, the contribution from vapor atom scattering is substantial for high MW excitations as shown in Fig. 7. The total collision frequency normalized decreases stronger than at T � 0 35. K, attains a minimum of about 0.76, and then very slowly increases reaching only 0.8 at Te �10 K. In this case, we conclude that the shape of the conductivity resonance at medium powers should be similar to the Lorentzian shape, slightly af- fected at the maximum (the minimum of �), as it is for the third data line in Fig. 2. According to the solid line of Fig. 7, vapor atoms restrict the total reduction in � and it should not exceed 24%. The observed reduction in � as shown in Fig. 2, is about 17% which is consistent with our calculations. It should be noted that the absolute value of the mo- mentum relaxation rate of SEs on liquid 3He previously measured employing different experimental setups [7,24] used to differ from the theoretical value by a factor of 2. Our new data of � obtained by measuring � xx under a weak magnetic field providing the semi-classical trans- port regime are in much better agreement with the theory. For example, the out-of-resonance data shown in Fig. 2 give: � � 15 3 10 8. � s–1 (T � 0 48. K), 2 4 10 8. � s–1 (T � = 0.35 K), and135 10 8. � s–1 (T � 0 3. K). The corresponding theoretical values for the total collision frequency are rea- sonably close: � � 16 10 8� s–1 (T � 0 48. K), 2 6 10 8. � s–1 (T � 0.35 K), and 146 10 8. � s–1 (T � 0 3. K). Thus, our new equilibrium conductivity data obtained for SEs on liquid 3He and the theory agree even numerically with the accu- racy of about 7.5% in both the ripplon and vapor atom scattering regimes. 5. Conclusions SEs on liquid helium exposed to resonance MW radia- tion represent an interesting system of hot electrons whose temperature can be much higher than the ambient temperature. The transport properties of such hot elec- trons along the interface can be described by the linear transport theory which allows to use them for probing the electron coupling with surface excitations of quantum liq- uids. At low ambient temperatures, the energy relaxation time of hot electrons is expected to be limited by emission of couples of short wavelength ripplons (��q eT� / 2), which potentially could be used for experimental study of the spectrum of surface excitations of liquid 3He in a high energy range (up to about 5 K). Our measurements of the conductivity resonance in- duced by MW radiation show that decay heating of SEs previously reported for scattering by vapor atoms remains to be an important factor in the ripplon scattering regime as well. It changes the momentum collision rate for elec- tron scattering within the ground Rydberg level and leads to electron occupation of higher levels. At certain condi- tions, the interplay between scattering by ripplons and scattering by vapor atoms affects strongly the shape of the conductivity resonance and leads to a reversing of the sign of the effect induced by MW radiation. Surprisingly, this reversing of the sign of the effect is opposite to that reported previously [7]. The theoretical analysis of SE re- laxation rates in the presence of MW radiation given here indicates that conductivity changes induced by MW radi- ation are very sensitive to the magnitude of the MW fre- quency which determines the range of holding electric fields used for tuning to the resonance. This analysis ex- plains well the conductivity variations observed, and eliminates the discrepancy between data obtained for different experimental setups. Acknowledgments The work is partly supported by the Grant-in-Aids for Scientific Research from Monka-sho. 478 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5 Denis Konstantinov, Yuriy Monarkha, and Kimitoshi Kono 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 T , Ke � � (T )/ (T ) e Total 3L A R 1L 3L T = 0.3 K , E = 93 V/cm� 2 4 6 8 10 Fig. 7. Momentum collision frequency vs Te calculated at E� � 93 V/cm and T � 03. K. Notations are the same as in Fig. 6. 1. Electrons on Helium and Other Cryogenic Substrates, E.Y. Andrei (ed.), Kluwer Academic Pub., Dordrecht (1997). 2. Yu.P. Monarkha and K. Kono, Two-Dimensional Coulomb Liquids and Solids, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heildelberg (2004). 3. C.C. Grimes and T.R. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 280 (1974). 4. A.S. Rybalko, Yu.Z. Kovdrya, and B.N. Eselson, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Phys. 22, 569 (1975) [ Sov. Phys.-JETP Lett. 22, 280 (1975)]. 5. C.C. Grimes and G. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 145 (1976). 6. V.S. Edel’man, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 77, 673 (1979) [Sov. Phys. JETP 50, 338 (1979)]. 7. A.P. Volodin and V.S. Edel’man, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 81, 368 (1981) [Sov. Phys. JETP 54, 198 (1981)]. 8. M.I. Dykman and L.S. Khazan Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 77, 1488 (1979) [Sov. Phys. JETP 50, 747 (1979)]. 9. E. Teske, Yu.P. Monarkha, M. Seck, and P. Wyder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2772 (1999). 10. D. Konstantinov, H. Isshiki, Yu.P. Monarkha, H. Akimoto, Keiya Shirahama, and K. Kono, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 235302-1 (2007). 11. Yu. Monarkha, D. Konstantinov, and K. Kono, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 33, 942 (2007) [Low Temp. Phys. 33, 718 (2007)]. 12. E. Collin, W. Bailey, P. Fozooni, P.G. Frayne, P. Glasson, K. Harrabi, M.J. Lea, and G. Papageorgiou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 245301-1 (2002). 13. W.T. Sommer and D.J. Tanner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1345 (1971). 14. M.J. Lea, A.O. Stone, P. Fozooni, and J. Frost, J. Low Temp. Phys. 85, 67 (1991). 15. K. Shirahama and K. Kono, J. Low Temp. Phys. 104 , 237 (1996). 16. R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light, Oxford Science, Oxford (2000). 17. T. Ando, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 44, 765 (1978). 18. Yu. Monarkha, D. Konstantinov, and K. Kono, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 124702-1 (2007). 19. Yu.P. Monarkha, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 4, 1093 (1978) [Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 4, 515 (1978)]. 20. Yu.M. Vil’k, and Yu.P. Monarkha, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 15, 235 (1989) [Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 15, 131 (1989)]. 21. Yu.P. Monarkha and S.S. Sokolov, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 32, 1278 (2006) [Low Temp. Phys. 32, 970 (2006)]. 22. P.M. Platzman and G. Beni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 626 (1976). 23. M. Saitoh and T. Aoki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 44, 71 (1978). 24. K. Shirahama, S. Ito, H. Suto and K. Kono, J. Low Temp. Phys. 101, 439 (1995). Photoresonance and conductivity of surface electrons on liquid 3He Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, Nos. 4/5 479