Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films

Microstructure, magnetic and transport properties of the as-deposited La₁−yCeyMnO₃(0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films, prepared by a pulse laser deposition, have been investigated in wide region of temperature and magnetic field. The microstructure analysis reveals that all films have a high c-oriented texture, t...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2009
Автори: Prokhorov, V.G., Kaminsky, G.G., Flis, V.S., Hyun, Y.H., Park, S.Y., Lee, Y.P., Svetchnikov, V.L.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України 2009
Назва видання:Физика низких температур
Теми:
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/117195
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films / V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, Y.P. Lee, V.L. Svetchnikov // Физика низких температур. — 2009. — Т. 35, № 6. — С. 593-602. — Бібліогр.: 44 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-117195
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1171952017-05-21T03:02:53Z Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films Prokhorov, V.G. Kaminsky, G.G. Flis, V.S. Hyun, Y.H. Park, S.Y. Lee, Y.P. Svetchnikov, V.L. Низкотемпеpатуpный магнетизм Microstructure, magnetic and transport properties of the as-deposited La₁−yCeyMnO₃(0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films, prepared by a pulse laser deposition, have been investigated in wide region of temperature and magnetic field. The microstructure analysis reveals that all films have a high c-oriented texture, the orthorhombic crystal lattice and the negligible quantity of CeO₂ inclusions. The observed strip-domain phase with a periodic spacing of about 3c, the crystal lattice of which is the same to the basic film phase, reveals the magnetic behavior typical for the Griffiths phase. The regions of the double-period modulated phase was found at room temperature in the y = 0.1 film, which are treated as the Mn³⁺/Mn²⁺ ordering with the partial ferromagnetic → antiferromagnetic transition at TN ≤ 80 K. At the same time, the carried out investigation manifests that the magnetic and transport properties of the electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ films, driven by a cation doping, are similar to that for the hole-doped La/Ca manganites. Therefore, one can conclude, that does not exist of a principle difference between the mechanisms of spin-ordering and charge-transport in the hole- and the electron-doped manganites. 2009 Article Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films / V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, Y.P. Lee, V.L. Svetchnikov // Физика низких температур. — 2009. — Т. 35, № 6. — С. 593-602. — Бібліогр.: 44 назв. — англ. 0132-6414 PACS: 71.30.+h, 75.47.Gk, 75.47.Lx http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/117195 en Физика низких температур Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic Низкотемпеpатуpный магнетизм
Низкотемпеpатуpный магнетизм
spellingShingle Низкотемпеpатуpный магнетизм
Низкотемпеpатуpный магнетизм
Prokhorov, V.G.
Kaminsky, G.G.
Flis, V.S.
Hyun, Y.H.
Park, S.Y.
Lee, Y.P.
Svetchnikov, V.L.
Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films
Физика низких температур
description Microstructure, magnetic and transport properties of the as-deposited La₁−yCeyMnO₃(0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films, prepared by a pulse laser deposition, have been investigated in wide region of temperature and magnetic field. The microstructure analysis reveals that all films have a high c-oriented texture, the orthorhombic crystal lattice and the negligible quantity of CeO₂ inclusions. The observed strip-domain phase with a periodic spacing of about 3c, the crystal lattice of which is the same to the basic film phase, reveals the magnetic behavior typical for the Griffiths phase. The regions of the double-period modulated phase was found at room temperature in the y = 0.1 film, which are treated as the Mn³⁺/Mn²⁺ ordering with the partial ferromagnetic → antiferromagnetic transition at TN ≤ 80 K. At the same time, the carried out investigation manifests that the magnetic and transport properties of the electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ films, driven by a cation doping, are similar to that for the hole-doped La/Ca manganites. Therefore, one can conclude, that does not exist of a principle difference between the mechanisms of spin-ordering and charge-transport in the hole- and the electron-doped manganites.
format Article
author Prokhorov, V.G.
Kaminsky, G.G.
Flis, V.S.
Hyun, Y.H.
Park, S.Y.
Lee, Y.P.
Svetchnikov, V.L.
author_facet Prokhorov, V.G.
Kaminsky, G.G.
Flis, V.S.
Hyun, Y.H.
Park, S.Y.
Lee, Y.P.
Svetchnikov, V.L.
author_sort Prokhorov, V.G.
title Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films
title_short Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films
title_full Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films
title_fullStr Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films
title_sort magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped la₁-yceymno₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films
publisher Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
publishDate 2009
topic_facet Низкотемпеpатуpный магнетизм
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/117195
citation_txt Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La₁-yCeyMnO₃ (0.1 ≤ y ≤ 0.3) films / V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, Y.P. Lee, V.L. Svetchnikov // Физика низких температур. — 2009. — Т. 35, № 6. — С. 593-602. — Бібліогр.: 44 назв. — англ.
series Физика низких температур
work_keys_str_mv AT prokhorovvg magneticorderingandchargetransportinelectrondopedla1yceymno301y03films
AT kaminskygg magneticorderingandchargetransportinelectrondopedla1yceymno301y03films
AT flisvs magneticorderingandchargetransportinelectrondopedla1yceymno301y03films
AT hyunyh magneticorderingandchargetransportinelectrondopedla1yceymno301y03films
AT parksy magneticorderingandchargetransportinelectrondopedla1yceymno301y03films
AT leeyp magneticorderingandchargetransportinelectrondopedla1yceymno301y03films
AT svetchnikovvl magneticorderingandchargetransportinelectrondopedla1yceymno301y03films
first_indexed 2025-07-08T11:48:33Z
last_indexed 2025-07-08T11:48:33Z
_version_ 1837079266723889152
fulltext Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6, p. 593–602 Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La1–yCeyMnO3 (0.1 ≤ ≤y 0.3) films V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, and V.S. Flis Institute for Metal Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev 03142, Ukraine E-mail: pvg@imp.kiev.ua Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, and Y.P. Lee q-Psi and Department of Physics, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Korea V.L. Svetchnikov National Center for HREM, TU Delft 2628AL, The Netherlands Received January 27, 2009 Microstructure, magnetic and transport properties of the as-deposited La Ce MnO1 3− y y (0.1 ≤ ≤y 0.3) films, prepared by a pulse laser deposition, have been investigated in wide region of temperature and magnetic field. The microstructure analysis reveals that all films have a high c-oriented texture, the orthorhombic crystal lattice and the negligible quantity of CeO2 inclusions. The observed strip-domain phase with a periodic spacing of about 3c, the crystal lattice of which is the same to the basic film phase, re- veals the magnetic behavior typical for the Griffiths phase. The regions of the double-period modulated phase was found at room temperature in the y = 0.1 film, which are treated as the Mn3+/Mn 2+ ordering with the partial ferromagnetic → antiferromagnetic transition at TN ≤ 80 K. At the same time, the carried out in- vestigation manifests that the magnetic and transport properties of the electron-doped La1− yCe yMnO3 films, driven by a cation doping, are similar to that for the hole-doped La/Ca manganites. Therefore, one can conclude, that does not exist of a principle difference between the mechanisms of spin-ordering and charge-transport in the hole- and the electron-doped manganites. PACS: 71.30.+h Metal–insulator transitions and other electronic transitions; 75.47.Gk Colossal magnetoresistance; 75.47.Lx Manganites. Keywords: manganites, microstructure, magnetization, resistance. 1. Introduction The hole-doped manganites L 1−xA xMnO 3, where L and A are a trivalent lanthanide ion and a divalent alka- line-earth ion, respectively, have attracted considerable attention due to their interesting fundamental science, connected with the discovery of colossal magnetoresis- tance (CMR), and potential for applications [1]. The transport and magnetic properties of doped manganites are interpreted as a rule within the framework of «double exchange» (DE) model which considers the magnetic coupling between Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ that results from the motion of an itinerant electron between two partially filled d shells with strong on-site Hund's coupling [2–4]. However, Millis et al. [5] have shown that DE mechanism alone cannot explain all aspects of CMR effect, particu- larly the temperature dependence of resistance, R T( ), above the metal–insulator (MI) transition temperature. The authors suggest that a polaron effect due to a strong electron–phonon coupling arising from the Jahn–Teller distortion of the Mn 3+ ions is a necessary component for explaining the details of the R T( ) behavior above the Curie point (TC ). Taking into account, that while Mn 3+ is a Jahn–Teller ion, Mn 4+ and Mn 2+ are both non-Jahn– Teller ions, one can expect that the substitution of a triva- © V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, Y.P. Lee, and V.L. Svetchnikov, 2009 lent lanthanide by a tetravalent element, instead of a diva- lent one, leads to the same result due to an origin of the DE between Mn 3+ and Mn 2+ . La 1− yCe yMnO 3 is a typi- cal electron-doped system which demonstrates the MI transition and the ferromagnetism (FM) similar to that for the hole-doped manganites [6]. However, numerical pub- lications reveal that the single-phase La 1− yCe yMnO 3 compound can be prepared only by the laser-pulse-depo- sition method at certain technological conditions [7–13]. At the same time, the collected data on the hole-doped manganites testify that the magnetic and the electronic phase diagrams of thin films are significantly different from that for the bulk and, therefore, it is desirable to perform an additional experimental study. In this paper we report the experimental results for the as-deposited La 1− yCe yMnO 3 (0.1 ≤ ≤y 0.3) films, pre- pared by the laser ablation. It was shown that the mag- netic and the transport properties of the investigated films, driven by a cation doping, are very similar to that for the hole-doped La 1− yCa yMnO 3 system. The ob- served evidence for the charge-ordered antiferromagnetic (AFM) state and the Griffiths phase is explained by the microstructure features of the films. 2. Experimental techniques A cross-beam laser-ablation technique was employed for the preparation of the films. A detailed description of the technique was presented elsewhere [14]. We used two Nd-YAG lasers with a wavelength of 1064 nm, a pulse duration of 7.8–10.5 ns, a pulse-repetition rate of 20 Hz, and an energy of 0.3 J/pulse. The power density of laser beam focused on the target was 9 5 10 8. ⋅ –2 1010⋅ W/cm 2. The targets were manufactured from the powders of the stoichiometric composition by hot-pressing and heating at 1200 °C for 4 days in air. The oxygen pressure in chamber was 200 Torr during deposition and 600 Torr during cooling. Under these conditions were grown the La 0 9. Ce 01. Mn O 3 (LCMO9) , the La 0 8. Ce 0 2. Mn O 3 (LCMO8), and the La 0 7. Ce 0 3. MnO 3 (LCMO7) films with the same thickness of d � 300 nm. The substrate was a LaAlO 3 (100) single crystal (LAO) with an out-of-plane lattice parameter c � 0.379 nm for the pseudocubic sym- metry. The substrate temperature during deposition was 770 °C, and only the as-deposited films were used for study. The θ–2θ x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were ob- tained using a Rigaku diffractometer with Cu K α radia- tion. The lattice parameters evaluated directly from the XRD data were plotted against cos / sin2 θ θ. From the in- tercept of the extrapolated straight line to cos / sin2 θ θ = = 0, a more precise lattice parameter was obtained. The high-resolution electron-microscopy (HREM) and elec- tron-diffraction studies were carried out using a Philips CM300UT-FEG microscope with a field emission gun operated at 300 kV. The point resolution of the micro- scope was in the order of 0.12 nm. The cross-sectional specimens were prepared by the standard techniques us- ing mechanical polishing followed by ion-beam milling at a grazing incidence. All microstructure measurements were carried out at room temperature. The magnetic mea- surements were performed by using a Quantum Design SQUID magnetometer. The resistance measurements were performed by using the four-probe method in a tem- perature range of 4.2–300 K and in a magnetic field up to 5 T. 3. Microstructure Figure 1 presents the θ–2θ XRD scans for LCMO9 (a), LCMO8 (b) and LCMO7 (c) films, which display the well-defined (00l) Bragg peaks of high intensity for the films (F) and the LAO substrate (S), indicating that the deposition results in a highly c-oriented crystal structure. At the same time, the additional peaks near the 2θ angles of 33 and 70° are existent, manifesting the presence of a second phase. Commonly this phase identify as the unreacted cerium dioxide (CeO 2) impurity, which is more 594 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6 V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, Y.P. Lee, and V.L. Svetchnikov 10 1 10 2 10 3 30 40 50 60 70 10 1 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 1 10 2 10 3 (0 0 1 ) F /S (0 0 2 ) C eO 2 (0 0 2 ) F /S b (0 0 3 ) F /S (0 0 4 ) C eO 2 (0 0 1 ) F /S In te n si ty cp s , In te n si ty cp s , In te n si ty cp s , c (0 0 3 ) F /S (0 0 4 ) C eO (0 0 2 ) F /S (0 0 2 ) C eO 2 2 2 , egθ d 10 2 (0 0 1 ) F /S (0 0 2 ) C eO 2 (0 0 2 ) F /S (0 0 3 ) F /S (0 0 4 ) C eO 2 a Fig. 1. θ–2θ XRD scans for the La1− yCe yMnO3 films with y = 0.1 (a), 0.2 (b) and 0.3 (c). F and S denote the film and the substrate, respectively. The Bragg peaks are identified for a simple pseudocubic symmetry. stable relative to the basic La 1− yCe yMnO 3 compound. It is confirmed by the calculated lattice parameter of the impurity phase from θ–2θ XRD scans, a � 0.543 nm, which is excellently coincident with the published results for CeO 2 [15,16]. Analysis of the XRD data for La 1− yCe yMnO 3 reveals that the out-of-plane lattice pa- rameter (c) for pseudocubic symmetry slightly decreases with the Ce doping following to the empirical expression: c c y= −0 0 005. , where c0 = 0.3885 nm. The found ten- dency for c completely agrees with the data, which were obtained for the La 1− yCe yMnO 3 films early [11,12], and is typical for the hole-doped manganites, such as La 1− yCa yMnO 3 [17]. Figure 2,a exhibits the low-magnification cross-sec- tional HREM images of the LCMO9 film, manifesting that the column-like microstructure is formed during the deposition with the well-defined sharp and flat in- terface between film and substrate. The average diameter of a column turns out to be about 20 nm (see inset in Fig. 2,a). The carried out HREM study of the LCMO8 and LCMO7 films (not shown) reveals the same co- lumn-like microstructure. The similar morphological feature of microstructure has been already observed in the La 1− yCa yMnO 3 films [18–20], and is explained by a dislocation-free epitaxial growth mode with the forma- tion of a strong lattice-strained state. These biaxial strains accommodate, during the film growth, in forming a co- herent columnar microstructure directed along interface normal which can be treated as prismatic antiphase boun- daries. The high-magnification cross-sectional HREM image of LCMO9, represented by Fig. 2,b, shows that the major part of the film has a perfect crystal lattice. This is con- firmed by the corresponding fast Fourier transform (FFT) for this image (see Fig. 2,c), which reveals the almost rectangular pattern only of basic Bragg spots, typical for close to the orthorhombic crystal structure. At the same time, the more careful analysis of a few HREM images shows that the angle between ortogonal atomic rows is near 89 2. °, indicating the slight rhombohedral crystal lat- tice distortion of the LCMO9 film. In contrast to that the high-magnification HREM images and the FFT patterns for the LCMO8 and LCMO7 films (not shown) manifest only the right angle between atomic rows, indicating the formation of the undistorted orthorhombic crystal lattice. The analysis of interspot spacings on the FFT patterns and the HREM images reveals that these films have the fol- lowing lattice parameters (for pseudocubic symmetry): c � 0.3887, 0.3877 and 0.3867 nm, and a b� � 0.3814, 0.382 and 0.3823 nm for LCMO9, LCMO8 and LCMO7, respectively. It is clear that the cross-sectional HREM analysis can not distinguish difference between a and b in-plane parameters. In spite of that the obtained lattice parameters are good coincident with the XRD data. The main microstructural peculiarity of the LCMO9 film, which is not observed in the LCMO8 and LCMO7 ones (in addition to the rhombohedral distortion), is pres- ence of the small regions of double-period modulated Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La1–yCeyMnO3 (0.1 ≤ ≤y 0.3) films Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6 595 LCMO9 LAO 30 nm a c c c* c* 2a (1/2 00) (100) b d c e 2 nm 2 nm Fig. 2. (a) Low-magnification cross-sectional HREM image for the La0 9. Ce01. MnO3 film. LAO denotes a substrate. Inset presents the column-like microstructure with an average diam- eter of a column about 20 nm (indicated by arrows). [(b) and (c)] The high-magnification cross-sectional image and the cor- responding FFT pattern for major part of this film. Only the fundamental Bragg peaks are indicated. [(d) and (e)] The same pictures for the modulated phase with the doubled a-axis lat- tice period parallel to the c-axis direction. The presence of superlattice spots with a modulation wave vector, similar to 1/2, 0, and 0, is evident. phase, represented by Fig. 2,d. In this case the FFT of HREM image (see Fig. 2,e) produces not only a rectangu- lar pattern of the fundamental Bragg spots, which are typ- ical for a regular pseudocubic crystal lattice, but addi- tional superlattice reflections with a wave vector q a= * /2 (indicated by a white circle), where a* is the a-axis re- ciprocal lattice vector. The similar superlattice spots in FFT pattern have already been observed for the hole- doped La 1− yCa yMnO 3 films, including composition of y = 0.1, and treated as appearance of a charge ordering of the Mn 4+ and the Mn 3+ ions [21–23]. Like the hole- doped manganites, there is no sharp boundary between modulated and unmodulated regions. Instead, one phase is blended gradually with the other. The another crystal-lattice imperfections, which are typical for the all made films, are connected with the pres- ence of the CeO 2 and, so-called, the strip-domain phases. Figures 3,a and b display the cross-sectional high-magni- fication HREM image and the corresponding FFT pattern, respectively, for the LCMO9 film in the area of the coex- isting the LCMO9 and the CeO 2 crystalline phases. It is seen that, in contrast to the modulated and unmodulated regions, the interphase boundary (indicated by dashed line) is the very sharp. The orientation relationship between these phases is [110] CeO2 | | [001] LCMO9, giving evidence that the crystal lattice of the CeO 2 inclusion is rotated on angle of 45° against to the matrix LCMO9 phase. The CeO 2 phase does not exceed a few percent of the film volume and has an average size of 100 nm. Fi- gures 3,c and b present the HREM image and the FFT pat- tern for the strip-domain phase, respectively. The similar long-periodic modulation of crystal structure has already been observed in the electron- and the hole-doped manga- nites, and was identified as the nanoclustering CeO 2 do- mains [13,24] or attributed to a specific ordering of the La and the doped ions [22,25]. The FFT of the HREM image for the strip-domain phase (see Fig. 3,d) manifests a rect- angular pattern of the fundamental Bragg spots, typical for the matrix LCMO9 phase, and the additional super- lattice reflections (indicated by white arrows), corre- sponding to the strip-domain modulation. Therefore, the strip-domain phase has a crystal structure similar to main phase of the film, and cannot to identify as the nano- clustering CeO 2 domains. More preferable seems to be explanation based on the Wigner-crystal model (or simi- lar to that), which takes into account the distribution of the doped ions in the La-based manganites [25–29]. It is found that La/Ca ordering along with Mn 3+ and Mn 4+ stripes in La1− yCa yMnO 3 is more energetically favor- able than La/Ca disordering that can lead to formation of the strip- domain structure, whose domain period, DSD , is equal to an integer of the crystal lattice parameters. The FFT pattern in Fig. 3,d reveals that DSD � 3c in our case. The data of the XRD and the HREM study are summa- rized in the Table 1. 596 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6 V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, Y.P. Lee, and V.L. Svetchnikov Table 1. Results of the XRD and the HREM analysis for the investigated films Samples Crystal structure Out-of-plane lattice parameter c, nm a Tetragonal ratio c a/ Lattice parameter of CeO2 inclusion, a, nm XRD intensity ratio at (002) Bragg peak XRD HREM data HREM data XRD data I /ICeO Film, % LCMO9 Rhombohedral 0.388 0.3887 1.02 0.543 0.9 LCMO8 Orthorombic 0.3875 0.3877 1.015 0.544 0.08 LCMO7 Orthorombic 0.387 0.3867 1.012 0.543 0.07 a For pseudocubic symmetry. CeO 2 2 LCMO9 a a c a c c* LCMO c* CeO b c 10 nm c* d (001) 2 nm Fig. 3. [(a) and (b)] The high-magnification cross-sectional image and the corresponding FFT pattern for the La0 9. Ce01. MnO3 film area where the basic and the CeO2 phases coexist. The dashed line indicate the interphase bound- ary. [(c) and (d)] The same pictures for the strip-domain phase. The white arrows indicate the period of strip domains in the (c) real and the (d) reciprocal space. The white square in the (d) evidences that the strip-domain phase has a crystal lattice of the basic phase. 4. Experimental results Figure 4 shows the in-plane field-cooled (FC) (solid symbols) and the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) (open symbols) temperature dependences of the magnetic moment, M T( ), for the LCMO9 (a), LCMO8 (b) and LCMO7 (c) films at different applied magnetic fields. All films manifest the ferromagnetic transition at the Curie temperature TC � 150, 250 and 280 K, for LCMO9, LCMO8 and LCMO7, respectively. The obtained results are very close to the published data for the bulk and the as-deposited films [9–13,24]. The observed splitting between ZFC and FC M T( ) curves in a low-temperature range at H = 0.01 T can be explained by the existent difference between an applied magnetic field direction and the easy magnetiza- tion axis. Assuming that, in spite of the high c-oriented texture, the column-like crystallites have a slight disori- entation to each other in the ab plane, one can conclude that the easy magnetization axes are randomly oriented, as well. Therefore, the difference between ZFC and FC M T( ) curves can be treated as a characteristic of the mi- Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La1–yCeyMnO3 (0.1 ≤ ≤y 0.3) films Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6 597 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 50 100 150 200 250 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 y = 0.1 a 0 T 0.01 T 0.05 T 0.1 T 0.5 T 1 T y = 0.2 b y = 0.3 c T K, M , B /M n μ M , B /M n μ M , B /M n μ Fig. 4. Temperature dependences of the in-plane FC (solid symbols) and ZFC (open symbols) magnetic moment for the La1− yCe yMnO3 films with y = 0.1 (a), 0.2 (b) and 0.3 (c), measured at different applied magnetic fields. Lines are guides to the eyes. –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 –4 – 2 0 2 4 –3 –2 –1 0 1 2 3 a y = 0.1 5 K 20 K 100 K 150 K 200 K b y = 0.2 c y = 0.3 TH, M , B /M n μ M , B /M n μ M , B /M n μ Fig. 5. Magnetic-field dependences of the in-plane magnetic moment for the La1− yCe yMnO3 films with y = 0.1 (a), 0.2 (b) and 0.3 (c), measured at different temperatures. Lines are gui- des to the eyes. crostructure perfection, which is higher for the LCMO8 film. Figure 5 presents the in-plane hysteresis loops, M H( ), for the LCMO9 (a), LCMO8 (b) and LCMO7 (c) films taken at different temperatures. All films have almost the similar value of the saturation magnetic moment at 5 K, near 3.3 μ B /Mn, which is higher than that was observed for the post-annealed films [24] while quite smaller of predicted by the theory [30]. It is seen more clearly on the temperature dependences of the saturation magnetic mo- ment, M Ts( ), represented by Fig. 6,a. Figure 6,b displays the in-plane hysteresis loops at 5 K for the films more in detail, which were measured in the ZFC (open symbols) and the FC (solid symbols) regimes. In last case the films were cooled down in the ex- ternal magnetic field of 0.5 T. This experiment was car- ried out for the feature testing of the exchange-bias-inter- action effect, which has been observed in the hole-doped La 0 7. Ca 0 3. MnO 3 compound [31,32]. The main obvious indication of the existence of exchange bias is the shift of the hysteresis loop along the field axis after field cooling of the sample. However, in our case the hysteresis loops are symmetrical regardless of the cooling regime with a coercive field of H c � ± 216, 83 and 167 Oe at T = 5 K for LCMO9, LCMO8 and LCMO7, respectively. Moreover, all films have almost the same remanent magnetic mo- ment, M r � 2.0 μ B /Mn, at this temperature. The observed minimal H c value for LCMO8 can be is explained by the more perfect microstructure which is realized in this film, as was mentioned above. Figures 7 shows the temperature dependence of re- sistance, R(T ), for the LCMO9 (a), LCMO8 (b) and 598 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6 V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, Y.P. Lee, and V.L. Svetchnikov –400 – 200 0 200 400 –2 –1 0 1 2 50 100 150 200 0 1 2 3 b 5 K y 0.1 0.2 0.3 a 0.3 0.2 y = 0.1 T K, H, Oe M , B /M n μ M s , B /M n μ Fig. 6. (a) Temperature dependence of the in-plane saturation magnetic moment for the La1− yCe yMnO3 films. Lines are guides to the eyes. (b) The in-plane ZFC (open symbols) and FC (solid symbols) hysteresis loops for the same films mea- sured at 5 K. The films were cooled down at H = 0.5 T. 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 2 10 3 50 100 150 200 250 10 2 10 3 100 200 0 100 200 100 200 0 250 500 100 200 0 200 400 a R , Ω R , Ω R , Ω 0 T 1 T 3 T 5 T b c T K, T K, T K, T K, y = 0.1 M R % , y = 0.2 M R % , y = 0.3 M R % , Fig. 7. Temperature dependence of resistance for the La1− yCe yMnO3 films with y = 0.1 (a), 0.2 (b) and 0.3 (c), measured at different applied magnetic fields. Lines are guides to the eyes. Insets show the corresponding temperature depen- dences of the magnetoresistance, MR (%). LCMO7 (c) films measured at different applied magnetic fields. The magnetic field was directed parallel to the film surface and at right angle to the transport current. The in- sets presents the temperature-dependent magnetoresis- tance ratio, MR, for the corresponding films. Here the MR value is defined by 100% × [R(0) – R(H)]/R(H), where R(0) and R(H) are the resistances without and with a mag- netic field of 5 T, respectively. It is seen that LCMO9 does not undergo the sharp transition in the metal state with de- creasing temperature in the whole temperature interval while demonstrates the significant increase of MR(T ) with the slight kink-like peculiarity near the Curie point, TC � 150 K (indicated by arrow). In contrast to that LCMO8 and LCMO7 manifest a typical for CMR R(T ) be- havior with the well-defined metal–insulator (MI) transition at TP � 225 and 245 K and MR � 600 and 440%, respec- tively. The main physical parameters of the films are summa- rized in Table 2. 5. Discussion The magnetic and transport properties of the investi- gated La 1− yCe yMnO 3 films are very similar to that for La 1− yCa yMnO 3 system. The decrease in Ce or Ca dop- ing up to y = 0.1 leads to suppression of ferromagnetic or- dering, which is accompanied by a significant decreasing of TC , and a disappearance of the MI transition at all tem- peratures. Figure 8,a presents the M(T ) dependence of the spontaneous magnetization (without an applied magnetic field) for LCMO9. It is seen that after the well-defined in- crease of magnetic moment, which is connected with the FM transition at TC ≤ 150 K, the M(T ) begin to drop with decreasing temperature at T ≤ 80 K. The evidence of the low-temperature magnetic transition is confirmed by the non-monotonic temperature behavior of the MR(T ), which is represented by Fig. 8,b. In addition to the kink-like peculiarity at TC , the MR(T ) curve demon- strates a sharp bend at T ≤ 80 K, indicating that the mag- netic state of film is changed with decreasing tempera- ture. For the La/Ca system of the same composition this phenomenon is explained by existence of the second fer- romagnetic → canted antiferromagnetic transition which supervenes FM at once [33,34]. This explanation can be used for description of magnetic behavior in the elec- tron-doped LCMO9 film, as well. The FFT pattern (see Fig. 2,e) for this film presents the small regions of dou- ble-period modulated phase with a wave vector q a= * / 2, Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La1–yCeyMnO3 (0.1 ≤ ≤y 0.3) films Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6 599 Table 2. Magnetotransport characteristics for the investigated films Samples Curie point, TC , K Coercive field, Hc, Oe Remanence, Mr Ms/ , % Magnetoresistance, MR, % a MI transition, TP , K Activation energy, EA , K LCMO9 150 216 63 200 — 1700 LCMO8 250 83 58 600 225 1600 LSMO7 280 167 64 440 245 1400 a Maximal value at TP, for LCMO9 at TC . 50 100 150 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 –500 0 500 –2 –1 0 1 2 100 150 200 250 0 100 200 300 H = 0 y = 0.1 y = 0.1 200 K H Oe, 1 T 3 T 5 T T K, T K, T C T N a T N T C T G b M , B /M n μ M , 1 0 – 2 B /M n μ M R , % Fig. 8. (a) Temperature dependences of the spontaneous magnetization (without an applied magnetic field) for the La Ce MnO0.9 0.1 3 film. Arrows indicate the FM (TC) and the AFM (TN ) transition temperatures. Inset presents the M H( ) de- pendence for the same film taken at T = 200 K, which is signi- ficantly higher than Curie point. Lines are guides to the eyes. (b) Temperature dependences of magnetoresistance ratio at dif- ferent applied magnetic fields. Arrows indicate the peculiari- ties on the MR(T) curves, connected with the corresponding magnetic transitions. TG is the Griffiths temperature (see text). which usually is treated as a formation of the charge-or- dered antiferromagnetic (AFM) state (with the ordering of Mn 2+ and Mn 3+ ions). Consequently, the FM and the charge-ordered AFM phases are coexisted in the LCMO9 film at low temperatures (T ≤ 80 K). However, in contrast to a well-known intrinsic phase-separation effect, which is very often observed in the hole-doped manganites and has an electronic origin [1], in our case these magnetic phases belong to the different crystal structures (mo- dulated and unmodulated), which are controlled by the long-range Jahn–Teller interaction and arise due to a nonuniform distribution of the lattice strain during an epitaxial growth mode [21,22,35]. The HREM analysis reveals that the double-period modulated (AFM) phase, does not exceed a few percent of the film volume, and can not to have a serious influence on the total magnetic pro- perties of the film. It is confirmed by the minor difference in the saturation magnetic moment at low temperature between films with a different Ce doping (see Fig. 6,a). At the same time, another kind of the magnetic in- homogeneity is existent in LCMO9 film. Inset in Fig. 8,a presents the M H( ) dependence for LCMO9, taken at tem- perature, which is significantly higher than Curie point. The hysteretic behavior of the magnetization loop evi- dences the presence a few of the FM phase in the tempera- ture range, where the film must be in the paramagnetic (PM) basic state. The chemical inhomogeneity of the film and the existence of long-term spin-ordered fluctuations (magnetic polaron clusters), can be main reasons for this phenomenon. It was shown recently that in La 0 9. Ce 01. MnO 3 film, deposited at the high oxygen pres- sure, Curie temperature reaches of 200 K [12]. The more reasonable explanation of this effect is based on the influ- ence of the oxygen doping on the Mn 3+ : Mn 2+ ratio, which provides the magnetic ordering and the electron transport in these compounds. The ionic structure of this manganite according to Jonker and van Santen [36] is La 1 3 − + yCe y 4+ Mn 1 2 3 − + + y δ Mn y− + 2 2 δ O 3 2 − − δ V δ O, where V δ O stands for the ratio of oxygen vacancies. Consequently, the real Mn 3+ : Mn 2+ ratio is significantly dependent on the oxy- gen content. The oxygen deficiency leads to increase of the Mn 3+ : Mn 2+ ratio ( y → 0) while the overdoping by oxygen reveals the decreasing Mn 3+ : Mn 2+ ( y → 1). Therefore, the La 0 9. Ce 01. MnO 3 film, prepared at the high oxygen pressure [12], can not be treated as an exactly cor- responding to the indicated stoichiometry, and the ob- served enhancement of FM ordering (increase of TC ) is governed by the increase in concentration of Mn 2+ . On the other hand, the HREM analysis reveals the presents of regions with a strip-domain phase (see Fig. 3,c), which can be treated as a low-dimensional layered structure. The main peculiarity of such kind of structure is the exis- tence of long-term spin-ordered fluctuations (magne- tic polaron clusters) [37], which leads to the Griffiths phase [38] formation above the FM transition point. In this case the magnetic moment can be written as M T H M H k T HB( , ) ( , ) exp ( / )= −0 μeff , where M H( , )0 is the magnetic moment at T = 0, k B is the Boltzmann constant, and μeff is the effective magnetic moment of magnetic polaron cluster. Figure 9,a shows the M T( ) dependences for LCMO9 in the temperature range above Curie point at different applied magnetic fields. The solid lines are the corresponding theoretical curves, obtained within the framework of magnetic polaron model [37]. It is seen that the theoretical curves excellently agree with experimental ones up to about T � 300 K, above which 600 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6 V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, Y.P. Lee, and V.L. Svetchnikov 3.4 3.5 3.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 150 200 250 10 –3 10 –2 10 –1 10 0 b y = 0.3 y = 0.1 y = 0.2 ln (R /T ), Ω /K T , –1 10 –3 K –1 a 0.01 T 0.1 T 0.5 T 1 T T, K M , B /M n μ Fig. 9. (a) Temperature dependence of the in-plane FC mag- netic moment for the LCMO9 film in the temperature range above Curie point at different applied magnetic fields. The solid lines are the corresponding theoretical curves, obtained within the framework of magnetic polaron model (see discus- sion in the text). (b) The ln (R T/ ) vs. T −1 plots for the La1− yCe yMnO3 films in temperature range above the corre- sponding Curie points. Solid lines are theoretical curves, ob- tained on basis of thermally-activated conductivity model (see discussion in the text). the film transforms to the true PM state. Consequent- ly, this temperature can be treated as the Griffiths one, TG � 300 K, and the temperature range between TC and TG is the area of existence of the Griffiths phase [39]. To avoid the PM contribution in magnetic moment, only the M T( ) curve, taken at lower magnetic field, is ana- lyzed in detail. The following fitting parameters were obtained in this case: M H( , )0 � 0.4μ B /Mn site and μeff � 7 5 10 3. ⋅ μ B . By taking the saturation magnetic mo- ment for the fully-FM state in this film as 3.3μ B /Mn, the estimated average diameter of a magnetic polaron cluster in the Griffiths phase turns out to be 6.2 nm, which is very close to that for the La 0 4. Ca 0 6. MnO 3 film with inclusions of the similar strip-domain phase [22]. Figures 8,b mani- fests that the magnetoresistance effect for the LCMO9 film occurs at T TG≤ , in other words in the Griffiths state, but without the MI transition below TC with the decreas- ing temperature. First fact once more confirms the exis- tence of long-term spin-ordered fluctuations at T TC≥ and the second one is explained by the deficiency of an itinerant electrons, which are necessary for formation of the conducting channel or the infinite cluster for theirs percolation [1]. Analysis of the HREM images for LCMO8 and LCMO7 (not shown) reveals that these films also have re- gions with the strip-domain phase and, as result, should be demonstrate the magnetic behavior typical for the Griffiths phase at T TC≥ . However, since our setting was limited to room temperature, we could not carry out the M T( ) measurements in the temperature interval far higher of Curie points and realize the careful test of this assumption. Figure 9 shows the (ln /R T ) vs. T −1 plots in tempe- rature range above the corresponding Curie points for the LCMO9, LCMO8 and LCMO7 films. These plots can be described on the basis of thermally-activated conductivity model which predicts an expression of R T R T E TA( ) exp ( / )= 0 where E A is the activation en- ergy in unit of temperature. The best agreement between the experiment and the theory (solid lines) is seen with the activation energy values as T A � 1700, 1600 and 1400 K for LCMO9, LCMO8 and LCMO7, respectively. These values are very close to that for the La/Ca films and testify to the thermally-activated polaron mechanism of the conductivity in the PM state. 6. Conclusions The electron-doped La 1− yCe yMnO 3 films ( y = 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3) have been prepared by the pulse laser deposi- tion on the LaAlO 3 (100) substrate. The microstructure analysis reveals that all films have a high c-oriented tex- ture, the orthorhombic crystal lattice, excepting of y = = 0.1, which manifests a slight rhombohedral distortion, and the negligible quantity of CeO 2 inclusions. The ob- served strip-domain phase with a periodic spacing of about 3c, the crystal lattice of which is the same to the ba- sic film phase, reveals the magnetic behavior typical for the Griffiths phase. The regions of the double-period modulated phase was found at room temperature in the y = 0.1 film, which are treated as the Mn 3+ /Mn 2+ order- ing with the partial FM → AFM transition at TN ≤ 80 K. At the same time, the carried out investigation manifests that the magnetic and transport properties of the elec- tron-doped La 1− yCe yMnO 3 films, driven by a cation doping, are similar to that for the hole-doped La/Ca man- ganites. Therefore, one can conclude, that does not exist of principle difference between the mechanisms of spin- ordering and charge-transport in the hole- and the elect- ron-doped manganites. Acknowledgments This work was supported by the KOSEF through the Quantum Photonic Science Research Center, Korea. V. Svetchnikov is grateful to the financial support of Nether- lands Institute for Metal Research. 1. For a review, see: Colossal Magnetoresistance, Charge Ordering and Related Properties of Manganese Oxides, C.N.R. Rao and B. Raveau (eds.), World Scientific, Singa- pore (1998); Colossal Magnetoresistance Oxides, Y. Tokura (ed.), Gordon and Breach, London (1999); E. Dagotto, T. Hotta, and A. Moreo, Phys. Rep. 344, 1 (2001). 2. C. Zener, Phys. Rev. 82, 403 (1951). 3. P.W. Anderson and H. Hasegawa, Phys. Rev. 100, 675 (1955). 4. P.G. de Gennes, Phys. Rev. 118, 141 (1960). 5. A.J. Millis, P.B. Littlewood, and B.I. Shraiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 5144 (1995). 6. P. Mandal and S. Das, Phys. Rev. B56, 15073 (1997). 7. R. Ganguly, I.K. Gopalakrishnan, and J.V. Yakhmi, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, L719 (2000). 8. P. Raychaudhuri, S. Mukherjee, A.K. Nigam, J. John, U.D. Vaisnav, R. Pinto, and P. Mandal, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 5718 (1999). 9. C. Mitra, P. Raychaudhuri, J. John, S.K. Dhar, A.K. Nigam, and R. Pinto, J. Appl. Phys. 89, 524 (2001). 10. P. Raychaudhuri, C. Mitra, P.D.A. Mann, and S. Wirth, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 8328 (2003). 11. W.J. Chang, C.C. Hsieh, J.Y. Juang, K.H. Wu, T.M. Uen, Y.S. Gou, C.H. Hsu, and J.Y. Lin, J. Appl. Phys. 96, 4357 (2004). 12. T. Yanagida, T. Kanki, B. Vilquin, H. Tanaka, and T. Kawai, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 033905 (2005). 13. D.J. Wang, J.R. Sun, S.Y. Zhang, G.J. Liu, B.G. Shen, H.F. Tian, and J.Q. Li, Phys. Rev. B73, 144403 (2006). 14. V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.P. Lee, K.W. Kim, and I.I. Kravchenko, Physica B307, 239 (2001). 15. A.G. Zaitsev, G. Ockenfuss, D. Guggi, R. W�rdenweber, and U. Kr�ger, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 3069 (1997). Magnetic ordering and charge transport in electron-doped La1–yCeyMnO3 (0.1 ≤ ≤y 0.3) films Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6 601 16. A.Varez, E. Garcia-Gonzalez, and J. Sanz, J. Mater. Chem. 16, 4249 (2006). 17. R. Mahendiran, S.K. Tiwary, A.K. Raychaudhuri, T.V. Ra- makrishnan, R. Mahesh, N. Rangavittal, and C.N.R. Rao, Phys. Rev. B53, 3348 (1996). 18. O.I. Lebedev, G. Van Tendeloo, S. Amelinckx, H.L. Ju, and K.M. Krishnan, Philos. Mag. A80, 673 (2000). 19. G. Van Tendeloo, O.I. Lebedev, and S. Amelinckx, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 211, 73 (2000). 20. Y.P. Lee, S.Y. Park, Y.H. Hyun, J.B. Kim, V.G. Prokho- rov, V.A. Komashko, and V.L. Svetchnikov, Phys. Rev. B73, 224413 (2006). 21. S.Y. Park, Y.H. Hyun, Y.P. Lee, V.L. Svetchnikov, K.W. Kim, and V.G. Prokhorov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 052502 (2006). 22. Y.H. Hyun, J.S. Park, T.W. Eom, G.H. Kim, Y.S. Lee, Y.P. Lee, V.G. Prokhorov, and V.L. Svetchnikov, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 042515 (2008). 23. V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, Y.P. Lee, S.Y. Park, Y.H. Hyun, J.S. Park, and V.L. Svetchnikov, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 34, 942 (2008) [Low Temp. Phys. 34, 746 (2008)]. 24. T. Yanagida, T. Kanki, B. Vilquin, H. Tanaka, and T. Ka- wai, Phys. Rev. B70, 184437 (2004). 25. F.L. Tang and X. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B73, 144401 (2006). 26. A.H. Chen, S.-W. Cheong, and H.Y. Hwang, J. Appl. Phys. 81, 4326 (1997). 27. S. Mori, C.H. Chen, and S.-W. Cheong, Nature (London) 392, 473 (1998). 28. M.T. Fern�ndez-D�az, J.L. Mart�nez, J.M. Alonso, and E. Herrero, Phys. Rev. B59, 1277 (1999). 29. P.G. Radaelli, D.E. Cox, L. Capogna, S.-W. Cheong, and M. Marezio, Phys. Rev. B59, 14440 (1999). 30. Q. Zhang and W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B68, 134449 (2003). 31. M. Muroi, P.G. McCormick, and R. Street, Rev. Adv. Ma- ter. Sci. 5, 76 (2003). 32. J. Nogu�s, J. Sort, V. Langlais, V. Skumryev, S. Suri�ach, J.S. Mu�oz, and M.D. Bar�, Phys. Rep. 422, 65 (2005). 33. G. Biotteau, M. Hennion, F. Moussa, J. Rodriguez-Car- vajal, L. Pinsard, and A. Revcolevschi, Physica B259–261, 826 (1999). 34. V.G. Prokhorov, V.A. Komashko, V.L. Svetchnikov, Y.P. Lee, and J.S. Park, Phys. Rev. B69, 014403 (2004). 35. M.J. Calderon, A.J. Millis, and K.H. Ahn, Phys. Rev. B68, 100401 (2003). 36. G.H. Jonker and J.H. van Santen, Physica 19, 120 (1953). 37. V.M. Galitski, A. Kaminski, and S.D. Sarma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 177203 (2004). 38. R.B. Griffiths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 17 (1969). 39. Since the first works of Salamon et al. [40], the many evi- dences for Griffiths phase were found in the doped manga- nites [41–44]. However, a physical nature of its origin con- tinues to remain very far from the complete understanding. 40. M.B. Salamon, P. Lin, and S.H. Chun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 197203 (2002); M.B. Salamon and S.H. Chun, Phys. Rev. B68, 014411 (2003); P.K. Chan, N. Goldenfeld, and M.B. Salamon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 137201 (2006). 41. J. Deisenhofer, D. Braak, H.-A. Krug von Nidda, J. Hem- berger, R.M. Eremina, V.A. Ivanshin, A.M. Balbashov, G. Jug, A. Loidl, T. Kimura, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 257202 (2005). 42. W. Jiang, X.Z. Zhou, G. Williams, Y. Mukovskii, and K. Glazyrin, Phys. Rev. B76, 092404 (2007). 43. W. Jiang, X.Z. Zhou, G. Williams, Y. Mukovskii, and K. Glazyrin, Phys. Rev. B77, 064424 (2008). 44. P. Tong, B. Kim, D. Kwon, T. Qian, S.I. Lee, S.-W. Che- ong, and B.G. Kim, Phys. Rev. B77, 184432 (2008). 602 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2009, v. 35, No. 6 V.G. Prokhorov, G.G. Kaminsky, V.S. Flis, Y.H. Hyun, S.Y. Park, Y.P. Lee, and V.L. Svetchnikov