Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures
The effect of the charge carriers overheating in a two-dimensional (2D) hole gas in a Si1–xGex quantum well, where x = 0.13; 0.36; 0.8, 0.95, has been realized. The Shubnikov–de Haas (SdH) oscillation amplitude was used as a «thermometer» to measure the temperature of overheated holes. The tempera...
Gespeichert in:
Datum: | 2008 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
2008
|
Schriftenreihe: | Физика низких температур |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/117882 |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Zitieren: | Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures / I.B. Berkutov, V.V. Andrievskii, Yu.F. Komnik, M. Myronov, O.A. Mironov // Физика низких температур. — 2008. — Т. 34, № 11. — С. 1192-1196. — Бібліогр.: 14 назв. — англ. |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraineid |
irk-123456789-117882 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
irk-123456789-1178822017-05-28T03:03:03Z Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures Berkutov, I.B. Andrievskii, V.V. Komnik, Yu.F. Myronov, M. Mironov, O.A. Низкоразмерные и неупорядоченные системы The effect of the charge carriers overheating in a two-dimensional (2D) hole gas in a Si1–xGex quantum well, where x = 0.13; 0.36; 0.8, 0.95, has been realized. The Shubnikov–de Haas (SdH) oscillation amplitude was used as a «thermometer» to measure the temperature of overheated holes. The temperature dependence of the hole–phonon relaxation time was found using analysis of dependence of amplitude of SdH oscillations change on temperature and applied electrical field. Analysis of the temperature dependence of the hole–phonon relaxation time exhibits transition of 2D system from regime of «partial inelasticity» to conditions of small angle scattering. 2008 Article Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures / I.B. Berkutov, V.V. Andrievskii, Yu.F. Komnik, M. Myronov, O.A. Mironov // Физика низких температур. — 2008. — Т. 34, № 11. — С. 1192-1196. — Бібліогр.: 14 назв. — англ. 0132-6414 PACS: 72.15.Lh;72.20.Ht;72.20.My http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/117882 en Физика низких температур Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України |
institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
collection |
DSpace DC |
language |
English |
topic |
Низкоразмерные и неупорядоченные системы Низкоразмерные и неупорядоченные системы |
spellingShingle |
Низкоразмерные и неупорядоченные системы Низкоразмерные и неупорядоченные системы Berkutov, I.B. Andrievskii, V.V. Komnik, Yu.F. Myronov, M. Mironov, O.A. Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures Физика низких температур |
description |
The effect of the charge carriers overheating in a two-dimensional (2D) hole gas in a Si1–xGex quantum
well, where x = 0.13; 0.36; 0.8, 0.95, has been realized. The Shubnikov–de Haas (SdH) oscillation amplitude
was used as a «thermometer» to measure the temperature of overheated holes. The temperature dependence
of the hole–phonon relaxation time was found using analysis of dependence of amplitude of SdH oscillations
change on temperature and applied electrical field. Analysis of the temperature dependence of the hole–phonon
relaxation time exhibits transition of 2D system from regime of «partial inelasticity» to conditions of
small angle scattering. |
format |
Article |
author |
Berkutov, I.B. Andrievskii, V.V. Komnik, Yu.F. Myronov, M. Mironov, O.A. |
author_facet |
Berkutov, I.B. Andrievskii, V.V. Komnik, Yu.F. Myronov, M. Mironov, O.A. |
author_sort |
Berkutov, I.B. |
title |
Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures |
title_short |
Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures |
title_full |
Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures |
title_fullStr |
Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures |
title_sort |
overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in sige heterostructures |
publisher |
Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України |
publishDate |
2008 |
topic_facet |
Низкоразмерные и неупорядоченные системы |
url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/117882 |
citation_txt |
Overheating effect and hole-phonon interaction in SiGe heterostructures / I.B. Berkutov, V.V. Andrievskii, Yu.F. Komnik, M. Myronov, O.A. Mironov // Физика низких температур. — 2008. — Т. 34, № 11. — С. 1192-1196. — Бібліогр.: 14 назв. — англ. |
series |
Физика низких температур |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT berkutovib overheatingeffectandholephononinteractioninsigeheterostructures AT andrievskiivv overheatingeffectandholephononinteractioninsigeheterostructures AT komnikyuf overheatingeffectandholephononinteractioninsigeheterostructures AT myronovm overheatingeffectandholephononinteractioninsigeheterostructures AT mironovoa overheatingeffectandholephononinteractioninsigeheterostructures |
first_indexed |
2025-07-08T12:57:40Z |
last_indexed |
2025-07-08T12:57:40Z |
_version_ |
1837083617281441792 |
fulltext |
Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, No. 11, p. 1192–1196
Overheating effect and hole–phonon interaction in SiGe
heterostructures
I.B. Berkutov, V.V. Andrievskii, and Yu.F. Komnik
B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
47 Lenin Ave., Kharkov 61103, Ukraine
E-mail: Andrievskii@ilt.kharkov.ua
M. Myronov
Musashi Institute of Technology, 8-15-1 Todoroki, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
O.A. Mironov
Warwick SEMINANO R&D Centre,University of Warwick Science Park, Coventry CV4 7EZ, UK
International Laboratory of High Magnetic Fields and Low Temperatures, P.O. Box 4714, 50-985 Wroclaw 47, Poland
Received June 26, 2008
The effect of the charge carriers overheating in a two-dimensional (2D) hole gas in a Si1–xGex quantum
well, where x = 0.13; 0.36; 0.8, 0.95, has been realized. The Shubnikov–de Haas (SdH) oscillation amplitude
was used as a «thermometer» to measure the temperature of overheated holes. The temperature dependence
of the hole–phonon relaxation time was found using analysis of dependence of amplitude of SdH oscillations
change on temperature and applied electrical field. Analysis of the temperature dependence of the hole–pho-
non relaxation time exhibits transition of 2D system from regime of «partial inelasticity» to conditions of
small angle scattering.
PACS: 72.15.Lh Relaxation times and mean free path;
72.20.Ht High-field and nonlinear effects;
72.20.My Galvanomagnetic and other magnetotransport effects.
Keywords: quantum well, 2D hole gas, Shubnikov–de Haas oscillation, hole–phonon relaxation time.
Introduction
The surface of the crystal experiences surface acous-
tic waves [1]: Rayleigh and Lamb waves and so on. The
interaction of electrons with them differs essentially from
the electron–phonon interaction in the bulk of the crystal.
The specific features of the electron–phonon interaction
are present in thin films of metals and semiconductors be-
cause the surface processes more strongly affect the ki-
netic properties of these objects. In free thin films with
d < λ (d is the film thickness, λ is the phonon wave
length) there are bending waves obeying the quadratic
dispersion law ω ∝ q 2 (ω and q are the phonon frequency
and momentum, respectively) [2]. Films on a substrate
can experience Love waves with shear horizontal pola-
rization. These waves obey an unusual dispersion law
ω ∝ /q1 2 [3]. The specifics of the phonon spectrum of
films affect the character of the electron–phonon interac-
tion. Besides, the space quantization of the electron spec-
trum can be an additional factor of influence in semi-
metallic and semiconducting films. The situation is quite
simpler at the interface in semiconducting heterostruc-
tures. Here the electron occupies the quantum states in the
quantum well (QW) and form a two-dimensional (2D)
electron gas, whereas the phonons can be thought of as
three-dimensional (3D) since the elastic properties of the
crystal are identical at the both sides of the interface. The
heterostructures in semiconductors offer a possibility of
investigating the electron–phonon interaction between
2D electron gas and 3D phonons.
The aim of this study is to investigate the hole–phonon
interaction in a 2D hole gas in SiGe heterostructures, in
particular to obtain information about the time and the
temperature dependence of the hole–phonon interaction.
The use of the quantum corrections to conductivity cau-
sed by the effects of weak localization on interaction can-
not provide information about the electron–phonon re-
laxation time at very low temperatures because in this
� I.B. Berkutov, V.V. Andrievskii, Yu.F. Komnik, M. Myronov, and O.A. Mironov, 2008
condition electron–electron scattering predominates over
other inelastic processes. This relaxation time can, how-
ever, be found from the electron overheating effect,
where the electron temperature Te increases above the
phonon temperature Tph due to a strong electric field
(current) or other heating factors. It should be noted that
the electron overheating effect in a 2D electron gas is in-
duced by the heat transport through the interface. Estima-
tion of the electron–phonon relaxation time is possible
because the transfer of the excess energy from the elec-
tron system to the phonon one is controlled by this time,
even under the condition of strong elastic scattering. Ex-
perimentally, this problem comes to estimating the elec-
tron temperature Te which changes under the influence a
strong current. To achieve the electron overheating effect,
the phonon should be free to leave the conducting layer
and come into the crystal surrounding (i.e. good acoustic
coupling is required between the conducting layer and the
crystal). This requirement is met in heterostructures.
In present study the overheating effect of charge carriers
was realized in p-type heterostructures with a Si1–xGex
quantum well. The Shubnikov–de Haas oscillation (SdHO)
amplitude was used as a «thermometer» to measure the
temperature of overheated holes.
Sample description
Four of the samples studied in this work (labelled
A–D, see Table 1) were prepared by the molecular beam
epitaxy technique [4]. In samples A and B the layers are
arranged as follows: a single crystal Si n-type (100) sub-
strate, pure undoped Si epitaxial layer, Si1–xGex quantum
well (~10 nm thick), undoped Si spacer (~20 nm), Si sup-
ply layer boron-doped at about 2.5·1018 cm–3, pure Si cap
(10 nm). In samples Ñ and D the composition of the crys-
tal beneath the QW, the spacer and the boron-doped layers
were Si0.7Ge0.3 and Si0.37Ge0.63, instead of pure Si.
To measure conductivity Hall bars were prepared,
shaped as a «double cross», i.e. a narrow (~0.5 mm) strip
with two pairs of narrow (0.05 mm) potential bars about
2 mm apart. The diagonal Rxx and off-diagonal Rxy com-
ponents of the resistance tensor were measured as func-
tions of magnetic field on samples A and C up to 11 T and
for samples B and D up to 6 T. The sample parameters: di-
agonal resistivity ρxx, hole concentration from Hall pHall
and SdHO pShH, mobility μHall and effective mass m*,
hole diffusion coefficient D measuring at the lowest tem-
perature are shown in Table 1.
Overheating effect and hole–phonon interaction in sige heterostructures
Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, No. 11 1193
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 2 4 6 8 10
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1 2 3 4 5 60
2
4
6
8
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
c
B, T
B, T
B, T
B, T
0
5
10
15
20
25
a
0
d
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
ρ
Ω
x
x
,
k
ρ
Ω
x
x
,
k
ρ
Ω
x
x
,
k
ρ
Ω
x
x
,
k
ρ
Ω
x
y
,
k
ρ
Ω
x
y
,
k
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
2
4
6
b
ρ
Ω
x
y
,
k
ρ
Ω
x
y
,
k
Fig. 1. Magnetoresistance ρxx and ρxy of samples A (a), B (b), C (c), D (d). T = 33 mK for sample A, and T � 0 3. K of the other samples.
Table 1. Characteristic parameters of the samples.
S
am
p
le
Q
u
an
tu
m
w
el
l
xx
,
k
Ω
p
H
al
l,
1
0
1
1
cm
–
2
p
S
d
H
,
1
0
1
1
cm
–
2
H
al
l,
1
0
4
cm
2
·V
–
1
·s
–
1
m
*
(m
0
)
D
,
cm
2
·s
–
1
A Si0.87Ge0.13 3.04 1.89 2.0 1.16 0.24 20.7
B Si0.64Ge0.36 4.78 6.42 6.7 0.22 0,24 13.9
C Si0.2Ge0.8 3.17 15.8 14.6 0.11 0.16 29.3
D Si0.05Ge0.95 0.54 17.5 16.2 0.68 0.156 179
The variations in magnetoresistances ρxx B( ) and ρxy B( )
with field, at the lowest temperatures, are illustrated in
Fig. 1 (ρ stands for the resistance per square area of a 2D
electron system). The curves exhibit pronounced Shub-
nikov–de Haas oscillations at B ≥ 1 Tand clear steps of the
quantum Hall effect in sample A.
Experimental results and discussion
Quantum interference effects were used in Ref. 5 to
estimate the electron temperature during electron over-
heating. Electron overheating becomes more obvious
when the SdHO are observed [6–8]. In the cited papers
the falloff of the amplitude of the oscillations with in-
creasing applied electric field was used to find a relation-
ship between the electron temperature and the rate of loss
of excess energy by the electrons. In Ref. 8 the depen-
dence of the energy loss time on the overheating tempera-
ture was found, and it was concluded that the main chan-
nel of electron energy loss is the emission of acoustic
phonons. In the present study, the overheating effect of
the charge carriers is used to calculate, straightforwardly,
the temperature dependence of the hole–phonon relax-
ation time in p-type Si1–xGex quantum wells.
In our experiments, the hole temperature Th was
found by comparing the SdHO amplitude change with
current and with temperature. As an example, the SdHO
amplitude observed in sample D at low current and vary-
ing temperature (a) and at constant temperature and vary-
ing current (b) are shown in Fig. 2.
The amplitude variation in these two cases were ana-
lyzed for three extrema (with filling factors ν = 18, 20,
and 22) in the magnetic field region 0.8–3.5 T. The quan-
tum numbers νare found from the off-diagonal compo-
nent of the resistance ρxy B( ) using the equation for resis-
tance quantization under the condition of the quantum
Hall effect (h e/ 2ν).
The electron overheating effect was considered in a
number of theoretical studies (their results are applicable
to hole overheating as well). In Ref. 9 an expression
T T
E
T
Te
e
e e− =
−
− −ph
ph
ph ph
2σ
γ
τ ( ) , (1)
was obtained from the heat balance equation, which con-
tains the characteristic of our interest, i.e. the time of elec-
tron–phonon relaxation τ e−ph at a certain temperature
Te−ph , characterizing the electron–phonon interaction un-
der the electron overheating condition. The prefactor γ
describes the temperature dependence of the electronic
specific heat C T Te ( ) = γ . Since this parameter is un-
known, it is reasonable to pass on to the equation of
Ref. 10
1194 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, No. 11
I.B. Berkutov, V.V. Andrievskii, Yu.F. Komnik, M. Myronov, and O.A. Mironov
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80
50
100
150
10 20 30 400
50
100
150
ba
T, K
ν = 18
ν = 20
ν = 22
R
,
Ω
R
,
Ω
I, Aμ
Fig. 2. Dependence of Shubnikov–de Haas oscillation amplitudes for sample D (à) with temperature and (b) with driving current.
Solid lines are guides to the eye.
( ) ( ) ( )kT kT eE De e
2 2
2
26= + ⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟ −ph ph
π
τ . (2)
This follows from Eq. (1) if we write down the heat
capacity and conductivity in terms of density of states
νds: C k Te ds= /( )π ν2 23 and σ ν= e D
ds
2 , besides it is
necessary to use expressions for 2D electron gas:
ν πds m= /* ( )�
2 , D F= /( )1 2 2
v τ (vF is the Fermi velocity
vF m n= / /( *)( )� 2 1 2π , n is the concentration of 2D elec-
trons). Equation (2) is quite convenient because it in-
cludes only one characteristic of the samples, namely
the electron diffusion coefficient D. The calculations ac-
cording to Eq. (2) gives possibility to obtain dependence
τ e eT− −ph ph( ). Temperature Te−ph is taken to be the mean
T T Te e− = + /ph ph( ) 2 [11,12], here Tph corresponds to the
temperature of the crystal.
The temperature dependences of the hole–phonon re-
laxation time τ h−ph of all the samples are shown in Fig. 3.
The dependences τ h hT− −ph ph( ) above 1 K for sample D
and above ~0.5–0.6 K for the other samples can be
approximated by the power function τ e T−
− −= ⋅ph
1 9 29 10
(Fig. 3, solid lines). It is essential that this function is
common despite the different characteristics of the sam-
ples. Moreover, the points corresponding to the filling
factors ν different for each sample fall on the same curve,
which suggests that the τ h−ph — value is independent of
the magnetic field. A stronger dependence τ h hT− −ph ph( )
appears below the temperatures specified above.
The results obtained must be interpreted in the con-
texts of the theoretical studies considering the tempera-
ture variations of electron–phonon relaxation for 2D elec-
trons interacting with 3D phonons [13,14]. In Ref. 14
these variations are analyzed in a wide range of tempera-
tures. The energy is quantized in a QW:
E
p
m
p
m m L
nx
x
y
y z
1
2 2 2 2
2
2
2 2 2
= + +
* * *
π �
,
where L is the width of the well, n is the quantum number.
Electrons occupied the ground state in the QW with the
energy E m Lz1
2 2 22= /π � * . The electron–phonon interac-
tion of 2D carriers is limited on variation of the transverse
momentum of the electrons in direction of quantization
(in z direction). The transverse component of the mo-
menta of the emitted (absorbed) phonons is determined by
the width of the QW q L⊥ /� 2π . At high temperatures
the thermal phonon momentum is q LT > /2π , and the
electron–phonon scattering is accompanied by emission
(absorption) of phonons with the wave vector mainly per-
pendicular of the QW. The process is characterized by the
dependence τ e T−
− ∝ph
1 . At lower temperatures the mo-
mentum of the thermal phonon q k T sT B= / � (s is the
sound velocity) is smaller than 2π / L. But if the phonon is
capable to change the wave vector of the electron by the
maximum value 2k F , the energy exchange between the
electron and the lattice can be about k TB . We expect the
dependence τ e T−
− ∝ph
1 2 in this region of «partial inelas-
ticity». At even lower temperatures (q kT F< 2 ) the wave
vector of the emitted (absorbed) phonon is limited by
temperature and the scattering is similar to the small-an-
gle scattering in a 3D metal following the dependence
τ e T−
− ∝ph
1 5.
The obtained dependencies τ h T−
− ∝ph
1 2 (Fig. 3) corre-
spond to the region of «partial inelasticity» [14]. At low-
ering temperatures the dependence becomes stronger. We
Overheating effect and hole–phonon interaction in sige heterostructures
Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, No. 11 1195
0.2 1.0
10
–9
10
–8
10
–7
10
–6
0.2 1.0
10
–9
10
–8
10
–7
10
–6
Sample B
= 5ν
ν = 6
ν = 7
Sample D
ν = 18
ν = 20
ν = 22
4.02.0
a
4.02.00.6
Sample A
= 8ν
ν = 10
Sample C
ν = 8
ν = 9
ν = 10
0.6
b
τ h
p
h
–
,
s
τ h
p
h
–
,
s
T , Kh ph– T , Kh ph–
Fig. 3. Temperature dependence of hole–phonon relaxation times τh−ph found from the overheating effect. Solid line is depen-
dence τe T−
− −= ⋅ph
1 9 29 10 , doted line is dependence τe T−
− −= ⋅ph
1 9 50 6 10. , dash line is dependence τe T−
− −= ⋅ph
1 9 51 2 10. , short dash line
is dependence τe T−
− −= ⋅ph
1 8 515 10. .
attribute this to the small-angle mechanism predict in
theory [14], which is characterized by the dependence
τ e T−
− ∝ph
1 5. The temperature of the transition to this
dependence obeys qualitatively (to within the numeri-
cal coefficient << 1) the condition q kT F� 2 , if we take
k nF = /( )2 1 2π for a 2D electron gas, i.e., the temperature
grows as the carrier concentration increases. The quanti-
tative discrepancy is not clear yet and may be connected
with conditional character of the formulas for 2D electron
gas to the real situation.
1. I.A. Viktorov, Rayleigh and Lamb Waves: Physical and
Application, New York, Plenum Press (1967).
2. I.M. Lifshits, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 22, 471 (in Russian)
(1952).
3. E.S. Syrkin, Yu.F. Komnik, and E.Yu. Beliaev, Low Temp.
Phys. 22, 80 (1996).
4. T.J. Grasly, C.P. Parry, P.J. Phillips, B.M. McGregor,
R.J.H. Morris, G. Braithwaite, T.E. Whall, E.H.C. Parker,
R. Hammond, A.P. Knights, and P.G. Coleman, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 74, 1848 (1999).
5. R. Fletcher, J.J. Harris, C.T. Foxon, and R. Stoner, Phys.
Rev. B45, 6659 (1992).
6. P.T. Coleridge, R. Stoner, and R. Fletcher, Phys. Rev. B39,
1120 (1989).
7. K.J. Lee, J.J. Harris, A.J. Kent, T. Wang, S. Sakai, D.K.
Maude, and J.C. Portal, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2893 (2001).
8. G. St�ger, G. Brunthaler, G. Bauer, K. Ismail, B.S. Meyer-
son, J. Lutz, and F. Kuchar, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 9, 765
(1994).
9. P.W. Anderson, E. Abrahams, and T.W. Ramakrishnan,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 718 (1979).
10. S. Hershfield and V. Ambegaokar, Phys. Rev. B34, 2147
(1986).
11. S.I. Dorozhkin, F. Lell, and W. Schoepe, Solid State Com-
mun. 60, 245 (1986).
12. V.V. Andrievskii, I.B. Berkutov, Yu.F. Komnik, O.A. Mi-
ronov, and T.E. Whall, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 26, 1202 (2000)
[Low Temp. Phys. 26, 890 (2000)].
13. P.J. Price, Ann. Phys. 133, 217 (1988).
14. V. Karpus, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 20, 6 (1986).
1196 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2008, v. 34, No. 11
I.B. Berkutov, V.V. Andrievskii, Yu.F. Komnik, M. Myronov, and O.A. Mironov
|