Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation
New instrument for applications in metrological measurements of laser pulse energy is presented. Due to its parameters, it can be used as a standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation. The instrument consists of a control unit, three different sources of laser radiation, two detectors of optic...
Збережено в:
Дата: | 2004 |
---|---|
Автори: | , , , |
Формат: | Стаття |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Інститут фізики напівпровідників імені В.Є. Лашкарьова НАН України
2004
|
Назва видання: | Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics |
Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118177 |
Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Цитувати: | Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation / J. Owsik, A. Zarwalska, Ja. Janucki, V.B. Samoylov // Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. — 2004. — Т. 7, № 2. — С. 202-206. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — англ. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraineid |
irk-123456789-118177 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
irk-123456789-1181772017-05-30T03:02:51Z Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation Owsik, J. Zarwalska, A. Janucki, Ja. Samoylov, V.B. New instrument for applications in metrological measurements of laser pulse energy is presented. Due to its parameters, it can be used as a standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation. The instrument consists of a control unit, three different sources of laser radiation, two detectors of optical signal, and a laptop. The whole system can be easily transported enabling one to perform measurements in situ, at customers, and not only in laboratory conditions. A method of measurements used in the standard operation is described. Main characteristics of the standard are shown. Methods enabling calculations of measurement uncertainties during laser energy meter calibration by means of our standard are also presented. 2004 Article Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation / J. Owsik, A. Zarwalska, Ja. Janucki, V.B. Samoylov // Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. — 2004. — Т. 7, № 2. — С. 202-206. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — англ. 1560-8034 PACS: 06.20.Fn, 07.60.-j http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118177 en Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics Інститут фізики напівпровідників імені В.Є. Лашкарьова НАН України |
institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
collection |
DSpace DC |
language |
English |
description |
New instrument for applications in metrological measurements of laser pulse energy is presented. Due to its parameters, it can be used as a standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation. The instrument consists of a control unit, three different sources of laser radiation, two detectors of optical signal, and a laptop. The whole system can be easily transported enabling one to perform measurements in situ, at customers, and not only in laboratory conditions. A method of measurements used in the standard operation is described. Main characteristics of the standard are shown. Methods enabling calculations of measurement uncertainties during laser energy meter calibration by means of our standard are also presented. |
format |
Article |
author |
Owsik, J. Zarwalska, A. Janucki, Ja. Samoylov, V.B. |
spellingShingle |
Owsik, J. Zarwalska, A. Janucki, Ja. Samoylov, V.B. Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics |
author_facet |
Owsik, J. Zarwalska, A. Janucki, Ja. Samoylov, V.B. |
author_sort |
Owsik, J. |
title |
Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation |
title_short |
Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation |
title_full |
Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation |
title_fullStr |
Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation |
title_sort |
portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation |
publisher |
Інститут фізики напівпровідників імені В.Є. Лашкарьова НАН України |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118177 |
citation_txt |
Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation / J. Owsik, A. Zarwalska, Ja. Janucki, V.B. Samoylov // Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. — 2004. — Т. 7, № 2. — С. 202-206. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв. — англ. |
series |
Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT owsikj portablethreewavelengthstandardforenergyunitofpulselaserradiation AT zarwalskaa portablethreewavelengthstandardforenergyunitofpulselaserradiation AT januckija portablethreewavelengthstandardforenergyunitofpulselaserradiation AT samoylovvb portablethreewavelengthstandardforenergyunitofpulselaserradiation |
first_indexed |
2025-07-08T13:31:09Z |
last_indexed |
2025-07-08T13:31:09Z |
_version_ |
1837085728074366976 |
fulltext |
Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. 2004. V. 7, N 2. P. 202-206.
© 2004, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine202
PACS: 06.20.Fn, 07.60.-j
Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit
of pulse laser radiation
J. Owsik, A. Zarwalska, Ja. Janucki, V.B. Samoylov*
Institute of Optoelectronics, Military University of Technology
2, Kaliskiego St., 00908 Warsaw, Poland, E-mail: jowsik@wat.waw.pl
*Institute of Physics NAS of Ukraine, 46, Prospekt Nauki, 03022, Kiev, Ukraine
Phone: +380 (44) 265 79 52; fax: +380 (44) 265 15 89, E-mail: samoylov@iop.kiev.ua
Abstract. New instrument for applications in metrological measurements of laser pulse en-
ergy is presented. Due to its parameters, it can be used as a standard for energy unit of pulse
laser radiation. The instrument consists of a control unit, three different sources of laser
radiation, two detectors of optical signal, and a laptop. The whole system can be easily
transported enabling one to perform measurements in situ, at customers, and not only in
laboratory conditions. A method of measurements used in the standard operation is de-
scribed. Main characteristics of the standard are shown. Methods enabling calculations of
measurement uncertainties during laser energy meter calibration by means of our standard
are also presented.
Keywords: laser, energy, metrology, standard, unit.
Paper received 29.12.03; accepted for publication 17.06.04.
1. Introduction
In the second half of nineties, a system for metrology
protection of laser technique in Poland was suggested
[1]. It was established at the Institute of Optoelectronics
(IOE) and based on two medium-level stationary stand-
ards of power and energy units of laser radiation. Uncer-
tainty of measurements connected to the standard of power
unit amounted up to 0.2%, while for the standard of en-
ergy unit � 0.85%. In 1998, a new idea of laser metrol-
ogy protection system in Poland appeared, grounded on
primary standard for radiant power unit based on the
absolute cryogenic radiometer [2]. The radiometer with
a very low uncertainty (expanded uncertainty for k = 2
equals 0.05%) of measurement has been recently installed
at the Central Office of Measures (COM). This system
for transfer of units of radiative energy and power, is
similar to systems developed earlier in other leading cen-
tres dealing with radiative calibration of heat-flux detec-
tors (the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt - PTB,
Germany, and the National Institute of Standards and
Technology � NIST, the United States). Both of these
systems [3�5] use high accuracy cryogenic radiometers
as primary standards for calibrations systems. In both
laboratories, the trap detectors, well-known and described
elsewhere [6], form the next level of the calibration chain.
The same solution has been adapted to our system (in [7]
details of common calibrations of Polish (COM and IOE)
and Swedish trap detectors against similar cryogenic ra-
diometer mounted at SP Institute in Bors, Sweden are
presented). Subsequent stages of the calibration chain
characterised by higher uncertainty of measurement de-
veloped at the IOE apparently differ from solutions used
in other laboratories, since we established two groups of
working standards: the local and portable ones. This
resulted from the analysis showing that further develop-
ment of calibration standards for metrology protection
system of laser technique will be focused on three differ-
ent directions. Those should be: microwatt standards for
telecommunication, powerful kilowatt standards for in-
dustry, and mobile compact medium-level standards for
units of energy or power of laser radiation for any appli-
cation. The present work deals with such a small, com-
pact, mobile standard of unique capabilities intended for
laser energy measurements with reasonably low uncer-
tainty of measurements.
2. Structure of the standard
As it has been stated in the previous section, the instru-
ment should meet all the most common demands, as far
as the metrology protection system for laser technique is
J. Owsik et al.: Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation
203SQO, 7(2), 2004
considered. If so, it has to ensure calibration or testing at
wavelengths mostly used in laser devices applied in in-
dustry, medicine, military applications, and science as
well. That is why the standard has been equipped with
Nd:YAG laser (λ = 1.06 µm), frequency converter dou-
bling Nd:YAG frequency (λ = 0.53 µm), and erbium la-
ser (λ =1.54 µm). Two calorimetric measuring transduc-
ers have been chosen as radiation detectors. These en-
ergy meters have flat spectral characteristics and they
withstand high energy levels of input signals. The stand-
ard is computer controlled and a special software packet
has been prepared for its operation. Optical scheme of
the standard is shown in Fig. 1.
3. Measuring transducer
Structural arrangement of the calorimetric measuring
transducer is presented in Fig. 2. It consists of two calori-
metric receivers: the working and compensation ones.
Each receiver consists of nickel-deposited copper cone-
shape cavity with substitution manganin winding assigned
for transducer calibration, copper compensation cone,
and copper-constantan thermopiles. Both receivers are
built in a passive thermostat mounted in two metallic
housings. In front of the receivers, a diaphragm is placed,
which reduces influence of convection flows and makes
transducer operation more reliable.
Principle of operation of the measuring transducer is
based on transformation of laser radiation energy into
thermoelectromotive force, which is proportional to op-
tical energy. The measured radiation enters working
cone 2, which is heated up. This heat is then transmitted
to the compensation cone 4. Heating of the compensa-
tion cone is registered by thermopiles 5, �hot� outputs of
which are placed on the cone 4, while �cold� ones � into
thermostat 11.
The thermopiles are connected according to a differ-
ential scheme. Output signals from them are then deliv-
ered to an amplifier and gained about 103 times. Electri-
cal scheme of the transducer enables it to precise electri-
cal calibration, which should be performed once a year.
Electrical scheme of MT-1 transducer is shown in Fig. 3.
The measuring transducer has been investigated in
order to estimate damage thresholds due to over-expo-
sure of laser radiation. Apart from laser energies, two
factors have been taken into consideration, i.e. beam di-
ameter and laser pulse duration. Measurements were car-
ried out using Nd lasers. Results of measurements are
shown in Fig. 4. The chart should be read as follows: if,
during measurement, values are too large (high laser en-
ergies) or too low (short pulses or small beam diameters)
as compared to depicted values in the graph - errors and
uncertainties related to measurements will exceed allowed
levels for a specified type of the instrument. In some ex-
treme cases, hard damage and disorder of the calorim-
eter can happen.
11
12
13
1 2 3 4 5 6 9
7
8
10
Fig. 1. Optical layout of the standard; MT-1, MT-2 � calorimet-
ric measuring transducers, FCR � frequency converter.
Fig. 2. Calorimetric transducer structure; 1 � diaphragm, 2 �
receiving cone, 3 � substitution winding, 4 � compensation cone,
5 � thermopiles, plate with resistors, 7 � inner housing, 8 � outer
housing, 9 � socket, 10 � processing & control plate, 11 � passive
thermostat, 12 � input window of compensating receiver, 13 �
input window of working receiver.
Attenuator 2
Tested
Meter
MT-1
Beam splitters
Lasers FCR
Aperture
l l
= 1.06 1.54 = 0.53 m, m mµ µ µ
Attenuator 1
MT-2
Tp1
Z1
II
Tp2
Z2
II
R2
R1
S1
S2
Processing
and control
plate
Working receiver
Housing
Compensation receiver
Internal screen
Fig. 3. Electrical scheme of MT-1 transducer.
204
SQO, 7(2), 2004
J. Owsik et al.: Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation
4. Operation of the standard
Firstly, if the instrument is to operate as a standard for
energy unit of laser radiation, it has to receive this en-
ergy value from a standard of much less uncertainty of
measurements. In our case, MT-1 transducer is given an
energy unit from primary standard of mean power and
energy unit of laser radiation. Energy unit is given in the
form of coefficient of equivalence between laser energy
for the wavelength 0.5 µm and electrical energy of ap-
proximately the same value. Calibration method applied
here is based on commonly used electrical substitution of
optical energy (electrical and optical heats are compared).
This value of energy unit is then being stored for a period
of 12 months after which the next calibration must be
performed. Of course, for metrological purposes, the cali-
bration chain should be assured, and, if a suitable stand-
ard is not available, the so-called intercomparisons are
to be carried out.
Typical proceeding aimed at calibration of an en-
ergy meter can be divided into some steps, each of them
being computer controlled. At the beginning, a proper
configuration of the standard must be chosen (operator
has to install a laser of the specified wavelength). After
15-minute warming up the standard, its auto-calibration
starts. As a rule, it comprises electrical calibration and
optical one. In these processes, calorimetric transducers,
MT-1 and MT-2, are firstly electrically calibrated. The
electrical equivalence factor is found. In order to decrease
uncertainty, this calibration can be repeated several
times. Optical calibration occurs in the next step, and
operator can proceed it up to 8 times. As a result, MT-2
transducer becomes calibrated against MT-1 one � opti-
cal equivalence factor between these two transducers is
found. The auto-calibration procedure is then completed,
and the next MT-1 transducer is removed from the stand-
ard configuration.
MT-1 calorimeter is now replaced with unknown
tested laser energy meter, which is to be calibrated. La-
ser pulses in the specified energy range are subsequently
generated, and calibration starts. The calibration is per-
formed using MT-2 readings, which are then compared
to the readings of the tested meter. The number of com-
parisons depends only on an operator, but typically it
equals to 10. The ten-fold repetition of measurements
makes the uncertainty of calibration more reliable. The
calibration factor and its uncertainty as well as the rela-
tive error of the calibrated energy meter and its uncer-
tainty are the final results of this calibration procedure.
5. Main operational and metrological charac-
teristics of the standard
Operational capabilities of the instrument are very inter-
esting, because there are three laser sources used in the
standard, calibration can be carried out in several en-
ergy ranges of the lasers, and MT-1 and MT-2 calorim-
eters are not spectrally selective (their spectral charac-
teristics are flat from 0.4 to 2 µm). Main operational char-
acteristics are shown in Tables 1, 2, and 3. The general
view of the instrument is presented in Fig. 5.
As it can be seen from Fig. 5, the standard, as a whole,
is a medium-sized compact instrument (view of a laptop
makes this statement evident). The standard can be dis-
mounted into parts, then put into the three normal-sized
cases and easily transported elsewhere. The total weight
of the instrument does not exceed 40 kg.
Apart from operational parameters, metrological char-
acteristics of the instrument are also very important. The
inherent standard uncertainty of measurements with this
instrument, u(ESSE), resulting from and related to a proc-
ess of energy unit transfer from the higher level standard
and connected to standard readings equals 1%.
As it was mentioned above, the calibration factor (CF)
and the relative error δ of energy meter under calibration
(EM) together with combined standard uncertainties of
these quantities uC(CF) and uC(δ) are final results of the
calibration process. Methods to calculate these uncer-
tainties and errors were elaborated according to [8].
Errors being made during measurements are sources
of uncertainties of CF factor and the relative error δ as
well. Estimation of uncertainties of measurements is per-
formed via two ways: A-type estimation � statistical analy-
sis of single measurement results series, and B-type esti-
mation � with use of other than statistical methods (for
example on the base of catalogue data, supplier data,
calibration certificate and so on). Typical procedure,
when calculating uncertainties of the factor CF and the
relative error δ, needs some formulae to be applied and
they are shown below, after some definitions:
i
EME is EM reading in the i-th measurement,
i
SSEE is reading of the standard in the i-th measure-
ment,
n is the number of measurements during calibration,
SSEE is arithmetic mean of the standard readings,
EME is arithmetic mean of EM readings,
( )CFuA is A-type standard uncertainty of CF,
( )CFuB is B-type standard uncertainty of CF,
( )δAu is A-type standard uncertainty of the error δ,
( )δBu is B-type standard uncertainty of the error δ,
( )CFuC is combined standard uncertainty of CF,
( )δCu is combined standard uncertainty of δ,
Table 1. Characteristics of the standard equipped with Nd:YAG
laser
Wavelength, µm 1.064
Energy range, mJ 3�5 60�75 150�180
Beam diameter, mm 3
Energy density 0.05 0.85 2.10
in laser beam, J/cm2
Pulse duration, ns 40
J. Owsik et al.: Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation
205SQO, 7(2), 2004
( )EMEu is standard uncertainty of EM readings
( )SSEEu is standard uncertainty of SSE readings,
EMEδ is resolution of EM readings (from EM
manual).
The set of necessary formulae leading to calculation
of the calibration factor and relative error as well as to
their uncertainties is as follows:
Arithmetic means can be derived as:
∑
=
=
n
i
i
SSESSE E
n
E
1
1
, (1)
∑
=
=
n
i
i
EMEM E
n
E
1
1
. (2)
The calibration factor CF:
∑
=
=
n
i
i
EM
i
SSE
E
E
n
CF
1
1
. (3)
Standard uncertainty of EM readings:
( )
3
EM
EM
E
Eu
δ
= . (4)
A-type standard uncertainty of the calibration factor
CF:
( )∑=
−
−
=
n
1i
2
1
1
)( CF
E
E
nn
CFu
i
EM
i
SSE
A . (5)
B-type standard uncertainty of the calibration factor
CF:
( )
( )
( )[ ] ( )[ ] .
1 2
2
2
2
2 SSE
PPE
PPE
PPE
SSE
B
Eu
E
Eu
E
E
CFu
⋅
+⋅
−=
=
(6)
Combined standard uncertainty of the factor CF:
( ) ( )[ ] ( )[ ]22 CFuCFuCFu BAC += . (7)
Table 2. Characteristics of the standard equipped with Nd:YAG
laser and frequency converter
Wavelength, µm 0.53
Energy range, mJ 10�15 40�55
Beam diameter, mm 3
Energy density 0.15 0.55
in laser beam, J/cm2
Pulse duration, ns 40
t , s
1
10 � 10
10
10
10
10
10
10
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Beam diameter, mm
100
50
10
5
1
0.5
0.1
R
ad
ia
tio
n
en
er
gy
, J
�1
�3
�4
�5
�6
�7
�8
�2
imp
Fig. 4. Maximum allowed values for laser radiation energy ver-
sus beam diameter and pulse duration.
Table 3. Characteristics of the standard equipped with erbium
laser
Wavelength, µm 1.54
Energy range, mJ 5�10 40�50 70�90
Beam diameter, mm 4
Energy density 0.06 0.32 0.55
in laser beam, J/cm2
Pulse duration, ms 1.5
1
2
3 4
5
Fig. 5. A picture of the standard for energy unit of pulse laser
radiation; 1 � MT-1 calorimetric transducer, 2 � main body of
the standard comprising electronics, optical tract, and MT-2
calorimetric transducer, 3 � frequency converter, 4 � Nd:YAG
laser, 5 � laptop with main menu of the software.
206
SQO, 7(2), 2004
J. Owsik et al.: Portable three-wavelength standard for energy unit of pulse laser radiation
Relative error of EM:
%1001
1
1
⋅
−= ∑
=
n
i
i
SSE
i
EM
E
E
n
δ . (8)
A-type standard uncertainty of the error δ is as fol-
lows:
( ) ( ) %100
1
%100
1
1
2
⋅
−
−−
=
∑
=
nn
E
E
u
n
i
i
SSE
i
EM
A
δ
δ . (9)
B-type standard uncertainty of the relative error :
( )
( )[ ] ( ) ( )[ ]
.%100
1 2
2
2
2
2
×
×
⋅
−+⋅
=
=
SSE
SSE
EM
EM
SSE
B
Eu
E
E
Eu
E
u δ
(10)
Combined standard uncertainty of relative error δ :
( ) ( )[ ] ( )[ ]22 δδδ BAC uuu += (11)
Based on these formulae, calibration factors and rela-
tive errors of any laser energy meters being calibrated
against this standard can be found.
6. Conclusions
The instrument can be used as the metrological standard
in calibration of energy meters for the lasers of 1.06 µm,
0.53 µm, and 1.54 µm wavelengths, respectively. The lat-
ter wavelength is eye-safe one. Generally, the instrument
can be used for checking energy meters at any wavelength
within the range 0.40 to 2 µm. In the process of energy
unit transfer, it uses a comparative method.
References
1. J. Owsik, A basis for metrological protection of energy
laserometry // J.Techn.Phys., 38(1), pp. 97-109 (1997).
2. J. Pietrzykowski, Primary standard for radiant power based on
cryogenic radiometer (in Polish), in Proceedings of Polish Na-
tional Metrology Congress, KKM�98, Gdansk. 15-18.09.1998.
3. K.D. Stock and H. Hofer, Present state of the PTB primary
standard for radiant power based on cryogenic radiometry //
Metrologia, 30, pp. 291-296 (1993).
4. T.R.Gentile et al., Calibration of a pyroelectric detector at
10.6 µm with the National Institute of Standards & Technol-
ogy high accuracy radiometer // Appl.Opt., 36(16), pp. 3614-
3621 (1997).
5. A.V.Murthy and B.K. Tsai and R.D. Saunders, Radiative
calibration of heat-flux sensors at NIST: facilities and tech-
niques // Journal of Research of the National Institute of
Standards and Technology, 105(2), pp. 293-305 (2000).
6. J. Pietrzykowski, Self-calibrated photodiodes and their ap-
plications, in Proc. of optoelectronics Metrology Conf.,
Lancut, Poland, 28-30.09.1998.
7. G. Werner and L. Liedquist, Calibration of radiant laser
power with a cryogenic radiometer at visible wavelengths
and at 10.6 µm // SPIE Proceedings, 4018, pp. 73-78 (1998).
8. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, Ge-
neva, Switzerland, ISO (1993).
|