Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures

The coherent thermal radiation from semiconductor plane-parallel resonator structures is investigated both theoretically and experimentally. The coherent properties of thermal radiation from these objects are manifested by sharp spectral lines and wellpronounced lobe-like directional patterns. We...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2007
Автори: Kollyukh, O.G., Kyslyi, V.P., Liptuga, A.I., Morozhenko, V., Pipa, V.I., Venger, E.F.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут фізики напівпровідників імені В.Є. Лашкарьова НАН України 2007
Назва видання:Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118340
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures / O.G. Kollyukh, V.P. Kyslyi, A.I. Liptuga, V. Morozhenko, V.I. Pipa, E.F. Venger // Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. — 2007. — Т. 10, № 4. — С. 94-102. — Бібліогр.: 17 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-118340
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1183402017-05-30T03:05:07Z Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures Kollyukh, O.G. Kyslyi, V.P. Liptuga, A.I. Morozhenko, V. Pipa, V.I. Venger, E.F. The coherent thermal radiation from semiconductor plane-parallel resonator structures is investigated both theoretically and experimentally. The coherent properties of thermal radiation from these objects are manifested by sharp spectral lines and wellpronounced lobe-like directional patterns. We investigated the dependences of the intensities of spectral lines and the angular distribution of thermal radiation on optical parameters of the structures. New optical effects are presented, namely, the modulation of the coherent thermal radiation spectrum by an external magnetic field and a uniaxial pressure. 2007 Article Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures / O.G. Kollyukh, V.P. Kyslyi, A.I. Liptuga, V. Morozhenko, V.I. Pipa, E.F. Venger // Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. — 2007. — Т. 10, № 4. — С. 94-102. — Бібліогр.: 17 назв. — англ. 1560-8034 PACS 42.25.Kb, 78.30.-j, 78.45.+h http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118340 en Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics Інститут фізики напівпровідників імені В.Є. Лашкарьова НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description The coherent thermal radiation from semiconductor plane-parallel resonator structures is investigated both theoretically and experimentally. The coherent properties of thermal radiation from these objects are manifested by sharp spectral lines and wellpronounced lobe-like directional patterns. We investigated the dependences of the intensities of spectral lines and the angular distribution of thermal radiation on optical parameters of the structures. New optical effects are presented, namely, the modulation of the coherent thermal radiation spectrum by an external magnetic field and a uniaxial pressure.
format Article
author Kollyukh, O.G.
Kyslyi, V.P.
Liptuga, A.I.
Morozhenko, V.
Pipa, V.I.
Venger, E.F.
spellingShingle Kollyukh, O.G.
Kyslyi, V.P.
Liptuga, A.I.
Morozhenko, V.
Pipa, V.I.
Venger, E.F.
Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures
Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics
author_facet Kollyukh, O.G.
Kyslyi, V.P.
Liptuga, A.I.
Morozhenko, V.
Pipa, V.I.
Venger, E.F.
author_sort Kollyukh, O.G.
title Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures
title_short Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures
title_full Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures
title_fullStr Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures
title_full_unstemmed Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures
title_sort coherent thermal radiation of fabry-perot resonator structures
publisher Інститут фізики напівпровідників імені В.Є. Лашкарьова НАН України
publishDate 2007
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118340
citation_txt Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures / O.G. Kollyukh, V.P. Kyslyi, A.I. Liptuga, V. Morozhenko, V.I. Pipa, E.F. Venger // Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. — 2007. — Т. 10, № 4. — С. 94-102. — Бібліогр.: 17 назв. — англ.
series Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics
work_keys_str_mv AT kollyukhog coherentthermalradiationoffabryperotresonatorstructures
AT kyslyivp coherentthermalradiationoffabryperotresonatorstructures
AT liptugaai coherentthermalradiationoffabryperotresonatorstructures
AT morozhenkov coherentthermalradiationoffabryperotresonatorstructures
AT pipavi coherentthermalradiationoffabryperotresonatorstructures
AT vengeref coherentthermalradiationoffabryperotresonatorstructures
first_indexed 2025-07-08T13:50:33Z
last_indexed 2025-07-08T13:50:33Z
_version_ 1837086944344932352
fulltext Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics, 2007. V. 10, N 4. P. 94-102. © 2007, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 94 PACS 42.25.Kb, 78.30.-j, 78.45.+h Coherent thermal radiation of Fabry-Perot resonator structures O.G. Kollyukh, V.P. Kyslyi, A.I. Liptuga, V. Morozhenko, V.I. Pipa, and E.F. Venger V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, NAS of Ukraine 41, prospect Nauky, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mail: kollyukh@isp.kiev.ua Abstract. The coherent thermal radiation from semiconductor plane-parallel resonator structures is investigated both theoretically and experimentally. The coherent properties of thermal radiation from these objects are manifested by sharp spectral lines and well- pronounced lobe-like directional patterns. We investigated the dependences of the intensities of spectral lines and the angular distribution of thermal radiation on optical parameters of the structures. New optical effects are presented, namely, the modulation of the coherent thermal radiation spectrum by an external magnetic field and a uniaxial pressure. Keywords: thermal radiation, coherent radiation, plane-parallel structure, IR emitter. Manuscript received 03.12.07; accepted for publication 19.12.07; published online 26.02.08. 1. Introduction Thermal radiation (TR) emitted from heated solids is commonly viewed as incoherent radiation, i.e. that with the broad spectrum and a quasiisotropic angular distribution of the intensity. However, it has been demonstrated in a number of papers [1–11] that TR of some special sources possesses well-pronounced coherent properties. These are sharp spectral peaks (temporal coherence) and narrow angular lobes (spatial coherence). Coherent TR is generated via the following mechanisms: (i) excitation of surface waves (surface plasmons or surface phonon polaritons) that are coupled to propagating electromagnetic waves due to a surface grating [1–3]; (ii) wave interference effects in plane- parallel structures [4–9]; and (iii) control of emissivity due to the existence of a photon band structure (photonic crystals [10–11]). The researches of coherent TR attracted a substantial interest due to its potential applications for the creation of novel controllable radiation sources intended for middle and far IR. Here, we investigate the coherent TR of semiconductor plane-parallel resonator structures. Contrary to (i) and (iii) mechanisms (that may be responsible for the generation of coherent TR in some narrow spectral regions determined by the material properties), the interference effects in the resonator structures make it possible to develop coherent TR sources for wide spectral ranges. In addition, the structures studied by us have one more advantage: their manufacturing technology is easy. We study the dependences of the spectral lines intensity and the angular distribution of TR on optical parameters of the structures. The effects of the modulation of a coherent TR spectrum by an external magnetic field [12, 13] and a uniaxial pressure are presented. These new optical effects are caused by induced optical anisotropy and are realized only for TR with well-pronounced coherent properties. 2. Some theoretical considerations Let us consider a semiconductor plane-parallel layer ( )lz ≤≤0 placed on a substrate ( )lz > ; the surface z = 0 is contacting with vacuum. We label these media (vacuum, layer, and substrate) with the subscript j = 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The system is at a temperature T. The semiconductor has refractive index n and absorption coefficient α. Let dJ = J (λ, 1ϑ ) cos 1ϑ dλ dΩ dS be the intensity of radiation in the wavelength range dλ from the area dS of the surface z = 0 into an element dΩ of the solid angle (oriented at an angle 1ϑ to the normal). According to Kirchhoff’s principle, J (λ, 1ϑ ) is given by the expression ( )( )1exp 2 ),( 5 2 1 −λλ ϑλ= kThc hc AJ , (1) Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics, 2007. V. 10, N 4. P. 94-102. © 2007, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 95 where A is the radiator emissivity (that is equal to its absorptivity). The absorptivity is defined as a fraction of the radiation energy flux (incident on the surface z = 0) that is absorbed by the system. The quantity J coincides with the blackbody radiation intensity if A = 1. The polarization properties of TR are described with the partial emissivities As and Ap (and A = (As + Ap) / 2). Here, the subscripts s and p label the quantities related to the s- and p-polarizations, respectively. The coefficients As and Ap for the structure considered were calculated in [6]. For a thick ( 14 >>λπnl ) layer with weak absorption ( λπ<<α n4 ), one can present the partial emissivities of the structure with a transparent substrate as ( )( )( ) νννν νν ν η+δη+ η−η+− = 21 2 2312 21 cos21 111 RRrr RR A . (2) Here, ps,=ν , 2 121 νν = rR and 2 232 νν = rR are the coefficients of reflection from the front (radiating) and back surfaces of the structure, respectively; ν12r and ν23r are the real parts of the Fresnel reflection amplitudes, ( )2cosexp ϑα−=η l is the transmission factor; 2cos4 ϑ⎟ ⎠ ⎞⎜ ⎝ ⎛ λ π=δ nl ; and the angle 2ϑ is related to the external angle 1ϑ by the relation 21 sinsin ϑ=ϑ n . For a layer on the absorbing substrate (when the whole structure is non-transparent), one obtains ( )( ) νννν νν ν η+δη+ η−− = 21 2 2312 2 2 1 cos21 11 RRrr RR A . (3) Equations (2) and (3) describe the quickly oscillating dependence of emissivity on the radiation wavelength λ at a fixed observation angle 1ϑ . For a given λ, the intensity is an oscillating function of the angle 1ϑ . The positions of extrema are determined by the interference conditions m n l 4 cos 2 λ =ϑ , (4) where m >> 1 are integers: even numbers for peaks and odd ones for minima (if r12ν r23ν < 0), or odd numbers for peaks and even ones for minima (if r12ν r23ν > 0). Conditions (4) coincide with those determining the positions of peaks and minima of the intensity of light passing through a Fabry-Perot interferometer. Equations (2) and (3) are valid also for a layer with mirrors (dielectric or metal coatings) deposited onto its large faces (these mirrors change the reflection coefficients). In such a structure, due to additional phase jumps at the layer faces, the positions of oscillation peaks differ from those given by Eq. (4). However, the oscillation amplitudes are determined by the same equations. From here on, we refer to the interfaces with reflection coefficients R1 and R2 as mirrors 1 and 2, respectively. Let us define the amplitude of the emissivity peaks for each polarization as ∆A = Amax − Amin (the subscript ν is omitted), where Amax and Amin are the emissivity values in the peak and the adjacent minimum, respectively. A TR line corresponds to every emissivity peak. The difference between the intensities in a peak and in an adjacent minimum will be referred to as the line amplitude ∆J. Let us determine the radiation line width (∆λ) at a half amplitude: 22 minmax JJJ ∆ =−⎟ ⎠ ⎞ ⎜ ⎝ ⎛ λ∆ +λ . (5) Taking into account that ∆λ << λmax (for thick layers), one obtains from Eq. (5): ( ) ⎥ ⎥ ⎦ ⎤ ⎢ ⎢ ⎣ ⎡ η+ η π λ =λ∆ 21 2 21 21 2 max 1 2 arccos 2 RR RR ln . (6) One can see from Eq. (6) that an increase of the parameter ( ) 21 21RRη leads to the narrowing of the radiation line width. We also studied how the TR spectrum depends on some external actions such as a magnetic field and a uniaxial deformation. Let us consider TR emitted along a normal to the layer in a constant magnetic field B = (0, 0, B) (the Faraday configuration). Inside the layer, the normal waves are circularly polarized waves with complex refractive indices 21)( xyxx in εε=± m . The labels “+” and “−“ are referred to waves with the right and left polarizations, respectively; the components of the dielectric tensor ),( Bωεαβ obey the conditions yxxyyyxx ε−=εε=ε , . In order to explain the magnetic field effect more clearly, we do not use Kirchhoff’s law but obtain the spectral intensity of TR from a direct calculation. We assume that the layer radiates due to thermal fluctuations of the electric current density [14]. For the TR intensity, we use Eq. (1), where now A = (A+ + A− ) / 2. (7) Here, A± is the plate emissivity attributed to the mode “±”. Note that A(B) = A(−B) and the emissivity coincides with the layer absorptivity. Hence, the intensity obtained obeys Kirchhoff’s law. The spectral intensity of radiation is determined by the sum of the partial intensities attributed to the “+” and “−“ modes, and the interference conditions (4) are valid for each mode. Since −+ ≠ nn , the positions of the extrema in the “±” spectra generally do not coincide, and this may lead to a “beat effect” resulting in a low- frequency modulation of the total spectrum. The effect of a low-frequency modulation of the TR spectrum by an external magnetic field is analogous, in its nature, to that observed in plane-parallel plates with anisotropic (due to a uniaxial strain) permittivity. In Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics, 2007. V. 10, N 4. P. 94-102. © 2007, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 96 the plate ( lz ≤≤0 ) of a uniaxial crystal with the optical axis oriented along the x-axis, the light waves propagating along the z-axis are the two waves with different indices of refraction: ||n and ⊥n for the waves with the electric vectors E = (E, 0, 0) and E = (0, E, 0), respectively. In the linear (in the strain) approximation, Pnn γ+=⊥ , Pnn σγ−=|| . (8) Here, γ is a phenomenological coefficient, P pressure, and σ the Poisson’s ratio. The polarizations of these waves are mutually perpendicular, and the interference between them does not occur. Hence, the TR spectrum is the sum of the partial spectra attributed to each type of waves, and a low-frequency modulation of the total spectrum can take place. 3. Experimental results In our experimental studies of TR, we used the plane- parallel plates of n-GaAs (the concentration of uncompensated donors Nd – Na = 1×1018 cm−3), n-Si (Nd – Na = 6×1017 cm−3 and 6×1016 cm−3), n-InAs (Nd – Na = 1.4×1018 cm−3) single crystals and the Pb0.8Sn0.2Te/BaF2 films of р-type (Na − Nd = 2×1018 сm−3). The plane-parallel plates were fabricated using a mechanical grinding with a subsequent polishing of their broad faces. The deviation from plane- parallelism was estimated from the transmission spectra. The plates with the biggest difference of intensities in the interference maxima and minima of the transmission spectra were chosen for the measurements. The plates, for which the interference effect was negligible (e.g., wedge-shaped plates), were used in our experiments for comparison. In what follows, we refer to these samples as non-plane-parallel plates. The plates had lateral dimensions of about 10×15 mm and thickness ≈ 100 µm. The thickness of the films obtained by laser evaporation [15] was 1.1 µm. The measurements were performed in the spectral region of free charge carrier absorption using a Fourier- spectrometer with a spectral resolution of 1 cm−1. The aperture of the optical equipment inlet did not exceed 2.5○. The intensity of radiation was normalized to the blackbody radiation measured under the same experimental conditions. 3.1. TR angular distributions The angular distributions of the TR from the plane- parallel Si plate (Nd – Na = 6×1017 cm−3) are shown in Figs. 1a and b. The solid curves show the calculated ratios between the emissivities )( 1ϑνA and )( 1ϑνA of the plane-parallel and non-plane-parallel plates, respectively, with different directions of polarizations (λ = 10.57 µm). One can see that, because of the multiple-beam interference, the radiation directional pattern has a number of pronounced lobes. The angular dependences )()( 11 ϑϑ νν AA for the s- and p-polarized emission (Fig. 1b and the left-hand side of the pattern in Fig. 1a) differ markedly from each other. In the 55°−75° range, the extrema for the p-polarized radiation virtually disappear; this is related to a drop (almost to zero) of the reflectance Rp. The angular dependences for the s- polarized and unpolarized emissions are similar in many respects, see Fig. 1a. One can see that the calculated and experimental data are in good agreement (in our calculations, we took the dependences α(λ) and n2(λ) obtained from our measurements into account). Fig. 1. Angular distributions of TR from n-Si plane-parallel plates for λ = 10.57 µm and l = 92 µm. The solid lines correspond to the results of calculation, while the dots correspond to the experimental results. (a) and (b) − the ratios between the emissivities of the plane-parallel and identical non-plane-parallel plates; (c) − the emissivities of plane- parallel plates. (a): the left-hand side corresponds to s- polarization; the right-hand side, to unpolarized radiation. (b) corresponds to p-polarization. (c): to s-polarization. The parameters used in the calculation: (a, b) − η = 0.93, n = 3.4; (c) − plates with l = 179 µm and n = 3.4 (right-hand side), n = 6 (left-hand side of the pattern), η = 0.87. Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics, 2007. V. 10, N 4. P. 94-102. © 2007, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 97 A more pronounced TR pattern can be obtained in the angular dependences if R1,2 of the plane-parallel plate are increased. This effect can be seen from Fig. 1c that shows the calculated angular dependences for the emissivities As( 1ϑ ) of a plate with the refractive index n = 6 (the left-hand side of the pattern) and that with n = 3.4 (the right-hand side of the pattern). For both plates, l = 179 µm and η = 0.87 (for 1ϑ = 0). 3.2. TR spectral dependences Oscillating curve 1 in Fig. 2 shows the spectral dependence (measured at the angle 1ϑ = 60° to the normal) of the TR intensity for a plane-parallel n-GaAs plate with an Al layer on its back face. (In this case, s- polarization is considered.) One can see that TR from a plane-parallel plate is drastically modified as compared to that from a blackbody (curve 2). The radiation intensity in peaks practically approaches that of a blackbody. Figure 3 shows the experimental spectral depen- dences for the emissivities of the plane-parallel GaAs plate (curve 1) and the non-plane-parallel plate (steadily increasing curve 2). Curve 3 shows the measured variance of the optical thickness al for the plane-parallel GaAs plate. The oscillations are pronounced better in the wavelength area where absorption is weak. For λ > 14 µm, when absorption becomes strong (αl > 2.5, see Fig. 3, curve 3), the multibeam interference is suppressed, and the oscillations practically vanish in the noise. One can see that the maxima and minima of the emission from the plane-parallel plate are arranged virtually symmetrically relative to the curve of TR from the non-plane-parallel plate. Fig. 2. Spectral dependence of s-polarized TR: 1 − from a plane-parallel n-GaAs plate with an Al layer on its back face. The viewing angle 1ϑ = 60°, R1S ≈ 0.51, T = 365±2 K. 2 − from a blackbody under the same experimental conditions. The inset shows the same spectra in the λ = 7.95−8.15 µm area. Marks – experimental J(λ) values, the curve – the result of the fitting to the experimental values. The curves in Fig. 4 present the emissivity of a thin Pb0.8Sn0.2Te film; TR is emitted along the normal to the film surface. In the calculation of A(λ), we took the dispersion of α and n in the film into account that was determined from our independent measurements (for Pb0.8Sn0.2Te films, n ≈ 6). Note that the thick substrate (L = 1.5 mm) with high transparency and small refraction coefficient (n3 ≈ 1.4) contributed practically nothing to TR. One can see from Figs. 2 and 4 that a good agreement is obtained between the measurements and the theory for both thick (λ /n << l, plates) and thin (λ /n ≈ l, films) layers. 3.3. The amplitudes of TR lines To investigate the dependence of the amplitudes of emissivity peaks on the coefficients of absorption and reflection, we chose n-GaAs (the concentration of uncompensated donors Nd – Na = 1.1×1018 cm−3). Its absorption coefficient beyond the fundamental Fig. 3. Experimental spectral dependences of emissivity A(λ) (curves 1, 2) and optical thickness α l (curve 3) for the n- GaAs plate; 1 is a plane-parallel plate, and 2 is the identical non-plane-parallel one. The viewing angle 1ϑ = 0°. Fig. 4. Spectral emissivity of a Pb0.8Sn0.2Te film (l = 1.1 µm). 1 – experiment, 2 – theory. Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics, 2007. V. 10, N 4. P. 94-102. © 2007, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 98 absorption edge is characterized by strong dispersion: α(λ)∝ λ3 [16]. This fact ensures the variation of the transmission factor η(λ) from η ≈ 0.98 down to η ≈ 0.01 in the spectral range 3−17 µm used by us. One can follow the variation of the radiation line amplitude in a wide transmission range by presenting the radiation spectrum as a function of η(λ). The curves in Fig. 5 present the theoretical and experimental dependences of the amplitudes of emissivity peaks, ∆A, on the transmission factor η at different mirrors on the faces. Figure 5а demonstrates ∆A(η) for a symmetric structure with non-absorbing mirrors (R1 = R2). The asymmetric cases – the plates with absorbing (e.g., metal) mirror 2 and non-absorbing mirror 2 – are illustrated by Figs. 5b and с, respectively. One can see that the ∆A(η) curves are nonmonotonic and have a peak, whose position (ηmax) and height (∆Amax) depend on the reflection value. The ∆Amax value grows and shifts towards the higher transparency region as the coefficient of reflection from the radiating face increases. This maximum is achieved at different values of the transmission factor, depending on the reflection from faces. One can see that ηmax increases with R1 and R2. If good resonator conditions in a plate are ensured, then the radiation redistribution over wavelengths is so strong that the radiation line amplitude approaches the blackbody radiation intensity. However, one can see from Fig. 5b that, in the case of a sample with an absorbing mirror at its back side, ∆A(η) does not tend to zero as η→1. A nonzero value of ∆A at η = 1 is due to the additional illumination from the non-transparent substrate (absorbing mirror) on the back surface. The substrate emissivity is small: in our case, 1 − R2 = 0.05 for curve 3 in Fig. 5b and 0.19 for curves 1 and 2 in Fig. 5b. However, its contribution to TR is considerable. Under sufficiently strict resonator conditions, just this radiation may become predominant in the total radiation from the structure. One can see from curve 3 in Fig. 5b that the amplitude of radiation lines for an absolutely transparent (η = 1) structure with an absorbing mirror (R2 = 0.95) and a non- absorbing mirror at the radiating face (R1 = 0.94) practically approaches the intensity of blackbody radiation. It should be noted that curve 3 in Fig. 5b is also nonmonotonic. Its peak at η ≈ 1 is pronounced very weakly and is not seen on the plot. If non-absorbing mirrors are applied, then there is no additional illumination effect, see Fig. 5с. Such mirror coatings can be realized using an interference multilayer structure made of IR-transparent materials. The ∆A(η) curves for non-symmetric structures are qualitatively similar to those in the symmetric case (Fig. 5а). However, at high R2 value in a non-symmetric structure, the amplitude of spectral lines is considerably higher and may reach that for a blackbody. Fig. 5. Dependences of the emissivity peak amplitudes ∆A on the transmission factor η for plane-parallel plates with different coefficients of reflection from the front (radiating) (R1) and back (R2) faces. Curves – the results of calculation. Marks – the results of analysis of the experimental spectra of s- polarized TR from n-GaAs plates (Nd – Na = 1.1×1018 cm−3, l = 100 µm) at different viewing angles 1ϑ . T = 365±2 K. (а) – mirrors 1 and 2 are non-absorbing, R1 = R2. 1 – R1 = 0.27; 2 – R1 = 0.43; 3 − R1 = 0.64; 4 − R1 = 0.95. Marks – a free n-GaAs plate, R1S=R2S: – 1ϑ = 0°, R1S≈0.27; − 1ϑ =50°, R1S ≈ 0.43; − 1ϑ = 70°, R1S≈0.64. (b) – mirror 1 is non-absorbing, mirror 2 is absorbing. 1 – R1 = 0.27, R2 = 0.81; 2 – R1 = 0.52, R2 = 0.81; 3 – R1 = 0.94, R2 = 0.95. Marks – an n-GaAs plate with an Al layer on the back face, R2=0.81. – 1ϑ = 0°, R1S ≈ 0.27; – 1ϑ = 60°, R1S≈0.52. (c) – mirrors 1 and 2 are non-absorbing, R2 = 1. 1 – R1 = 0.27; 2 – R1 = 0.65; 3 – R1 = 0.85. Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics, 2007. V. 10, N 4. P. 94-102. © 2007, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 99 The ∆A(η) dependences (obtained from the analysis of the experimental TR spectra for plane- parallel GaAs plates) are shown in Figs. 5а and b by marks. On the abscissa, the mean η value in the λmax−λmin spectral range is plotted for each mark. Since the η variation in those ranges did not exceed 6 %, one can conclude that the error of such a representation is insignificant. When calculating the J(η) dependence from the experimental spectrum J(λ), we used the dispersion dependence η(λ) that was determined by us experimentally for the given material from its transmission and reflection spectra. Figure 5а demonstrates the symmetric case (the reflection coefficients at both faces are the same). The GaAs plate surfaces were clean, and the R1 and R2 values were varied by changing the angle of outgoing radiation viewing. In Fig. 5b, we show the ∆A(η) dependences for an n-GaAs plane-parallel plate with an aluminum mirror deposited onto the back face. In this case, the coefficient of reflection from the back face was R2 = 0.81 (this value was determined by us experimentally). The curve in Fig. 6 presents the dependence of the relative radiation line width ( 2 maxλλ∆ ) on the parameter η(R1 R2)1/2. The marks show the 2 maxλλ∆ values determined from the experimental TR spectra for the n-GaAs plates (with free faces and with an aluminum mirror on the back face). We determined ∆λ for radiation lines in a narrow spectral range (λ = 8−9 µm), where n varies insigni- ficantly (in our calculations, we used the n value averaged over the above spectral range: n = 3.18). When analyzing the line parameters, we applied the fitting to the experimental results. There is a good agreement between the experimental results and those of theoretical calculations. Fig. 6. Dependence of the relative radiation line width ∆λ/∆λ2 max on the parameter η(R1R2)1/2; n2 = 3.18; l = 100 µm. The curve is the result of calculation. Marks are the results of analysis of experimental data in the λ = 8−9 µm range: – 1ϑ = 0°, R1 = R2 ≈ 0.27; – 1ϑ = 50°, R1S = R2S ≈ 0.43; – 1ϑ = 70°, R1S = R2S ≈ 0.64; – 1ϑ = 0°, R1 ≈ 0.27, R2 = 0.81; – 1ϑ = 60°, R1S ≈ 0.52, R2 = 0.81. 3.4. Influence of a magnetic field on the TR spectrum For the measurements of spectra, the plane-parallel plates made of n-InAs were used (this material is isotropic in the absence of a magnetic field). The high concentration of free electrons (Ne = 1.4×1018 cm−3) made it possible to carry out the measurements in a classical magnetic field: the Landau splitting energy ħωc is small as compared with kT (ωc is the cyclotron frequency). The 10×13 mm samples had the thickness l = 100 µm; the deviation from plane-parallelism was no more than a few seconds of arc. The plate was placed between the magnet poles so that the magnetic field was directed normally to the broad faces of the sample, and TR emitted along the magnetic field was measured. In Fig. 7, we present the experimental TR spectra taken without magnetic field (Fig. 7a) and in the magnetic field B = 1.3 T (Fig. 7e). In the magnetic field, a bottleneck appears at nearly λ ≈ 9.2 µm where the interference extrema practically disappear. As the wavelength grows, the interference becomes apparent again; the spectrum extrema, however, are in antiphase, as compared with those at B = 0. The polarization properties of TR were demonstrated by its transformation into the linear polarized radiation. For this purpose, we used a Ge total internal reflection prism with base angles of 42°56′. Since the polarization planes of right- and left-hand polarized radiation are mutually perpendicular, we separated the required radiation mode by applying a polarizer-analyzer. Figures 7b and 7c show the spectra of the right- and left-hand circular polarized modes of TR, respectively. Since n+ ≠ n−, the positions of extrema of the spectrum in Figs. 7b and 7c generally do not coincide. Such a difference in the partial spectra leads to a “beat effect” resulting in a low-frequency modulation of the total spectrum. One can see that the oscillation phase of the right-hand circularly polarized mode takes the lead over that of the left-hand circularly polarized mode, and they are in antiphase at λ ≈ 9.2 µm. The oscillations in the total spectrum (recorded without a polarizer-analyzer, Fig. 7e) are not observed practically in this wavelength range. In Fig. 7d, we give the arithmetic sum of the spectra of the right-hand and left-hand circularly polarized modes; it agrees well with the total TR spectrum shown in Fig. 7e. This result proves that the mode “+” (“−”) had a right-hand (left-hand) circular polarization in our experiments. Some insignificant distinction between the spectrum amplitudes in Figs. 7e and d is due to the losses introduced by a polarizer- analyzer. The theoretical spectra agree well with the experimental ones for the electron effective mass m = 0.04 me (this value was determined by the comparison and adjustment of the calculated and measured spectra; it is in good agreement with the known data [17]). Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics, 2007. V. 10, N 4. P. 94-102. © 2007, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 100 Fig. 7. Experimental spectra of TR from an n-InAs plate (Ne = 1.4×1018 cm−3, l = 100 µm, T = 375 K) without magnetic field (a) and in the magnetic field B = 1.3 T. (b) – right-hand circularly polarized mode; (c) – left-hand circularly polarized mode; (d) – a sum of (c) and (d) spectra; (e) – the spectrum recorded without analyzer. It is worth to note that the reported effect appears in the radiation of intrinsic unpolarized light and thus differs in principle from the known magnetooptical effects such as the Faraday and Voigt effects or magnetoplasma reflection that describe the peculiarities of the transmission (or reflection) of external polarized light. It should be emphasized that the effect under consideration is realized for TR with well-pronounced coherent properties only. 3.5. Influence of uniaxial deformation on the TR spectrum When studying the TR and the transmission spectra of uniaxially compressed plane-parallel plates, we used Si with Nd – Na = 6×1017 cm−3 and 6×1016 cm−3, respectively. The 5×8 mm crystals (the thickness l = 350 µm) were compressed along their long face (i.e., along the [100] axis). We investigated the radiation propagating along a normal to the direction of compression, i.e., to the optical axis. The optical surfaces of the sample coincided with the (100) plane. In this case, the waves with the electric vector oriented along and perpendicularly to the optic axis have different velocities related to the refractive indices ||n and ⊥n , respectively. Therefore, the radiation leaving a uniaxially strained crystal is a superposition of two oscillating interference spectra, each of them corresponding to ⊥n or ||n . Fig. 8. Experimental transmission spectra of a uniaxially strained plane-parallel Si sample. 1 – Р = 0, arbitrary direction of the polarization plane of the detected radiation; 2 – Р = 6 kbar, the polarization plane is perpendicular to the direction of compression; 3 – Р = 6 kbar, the polarization plane is parallel to the direction of compression. Т = 355 K. The samples were strained uniaxially in a special facility; it ensured a mechanical stress that was uniform over the sample cross section. The transmission spectra were recorded when the sample was illuminated with unpolarized radiation. Investigations of both TR and transmission spectra were carried out in two ways, namely, with and without an analyzer between the sample under investigation and a spectrometer receptor. The analyzer (a grating-polarizer) was placed so that its axis was oriented either in parallel to the compression direction or along a normal to it. The TR and transmission spectra were measured in the 3–18-µm wavelength range; the sample temperature was Т = 355 K. In Fig. 8, we display the transmission spectra (in the wavelength range 9.935–10.03 µm) of an unstrained (curve 1) and strained (pressure Р = 6 kbar) samples taken when the analyzer axis was perpendicular to the compression direction (curve 2) and in parallel to it (curve 3). (At Р = 0, the crystal is isotropic, so curve 1 is repeated at any of the above analyzer orientations.) The form of the spectra taken is typical of the transmission interference spectra of plane-parallel samples. The positions of maxima and minima in each spectrum are determined by the refractive index n (curve 1), ⊥n (2), and ||n (3), respectively. The spectral shifts of curves 2 and 3 relative to curve 1 determine birefringence ( ⊥n − ||n = 6×10−3 at Р = 6 kbar). We note that the TR spectra are qualitatively similar to those of transmission because the positions of maxima and minima in both spectra of a plane-parallel plate are just the same if the measurements are made at the same temperature. The spectra of transmission of unpolarized light and TR taken without an analyzer demonstrate the presence of beats (low-frequency amplitude modulation). Figure 9 presents the calculated emissivity spectrum of an uniaxial deformed Si sample; the parameters are as follows: l = 350 µm, n = 3.4, ⊥n = 3.4018, ||n = 3.3990 (P =3 kbar) and Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics, 2007. V. 10, N 4. P. 94-102. © 2007, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 101 Fig. 9. Calculated emissivity spectra of a uniaxially compressed Si plane-parallel plate. Р = 3 kbar (a) and 4 kbar (b); Т = 355 K. Fig. 10. Experimental transmission spectra of a uniaxially compressed plane-parallel Si sample (no analyzer). Р = 0 (a), 3 (b), and 4 kbar (c); Т = 355 K. ⊥n = 3.4025, ||n = 3.3986 (P = 4 kbar), the dependence α(λ) was not taken into account. The values of ⊥n and ||n were obtained from an analysis of the experimental transmission spectra. They correspond to those given by Eq. (8) at γ = 7.3×10−7 bar−1 and σ = 0.3. One can see that the beat node shifts towards a low-energy part of the spectrum as the pressure P (and, with it, the difference ⊥n − ||n ) increases. The experimental transmission spectrum is shown in Fig. 10 (the spectral bands near 9 and 16 µm are the regions of absorption induced by the oxygen vibration absorption and the lattice absorption, respectively). The position of the beat node, as well as its spectral shift, is in close agreement with the calculated data. It should be noted that, as far as we know, the low- frequency modulation in the transmission spectra of anisotropic resonator objects has not been observed before, and we seem to be the first to report it. The investigation of the TR spectra under the uniaxial compression, as well as under the action of an external magnetic field, makes it possible to determine the parameters of semiconductors at high temperatures. 4. Conclusions In this paper, we have investigated the dependence of coherent TR of semiconductor planar resonator structures on their optical parameters, as well as the spectrum modulation of coherent TR by an external magnetic field and a uniaxial pressure. Due to the multibeam interference, a smooth spectral dependence of radiation is transformed into an oscillating one with sharp peaks. In addition, the angular dependence of TR does not obey Lambert’s law and demonstrates a nonmonotonic character with clearly pronounced lobes. We determined the optimal conditions under which the intensity of TR of the planar resonator structures may approach that of blackbody radiation. The results may be of use when developing new thermal sources of IR radiation, whose operating spectral band is given by the emitting element parameters. When designing a controllable source or optical sensor involving planar resonator structures as a radiating element, one should take into account both the reflection from interfaces and the absorption in emitting layers. The optical parameters and hence the characteristics of the radiating element can be modulated with the help of the known methods of variation of the free charge carrier concentration (e.g., by the contact injection or exclusion, photogeneration, or the magnetoconcentration effect). We have demonstrated a new magneto-optical effect – the low-frequency modulation of a rapidly oscillating spectrum of TR by an external magnetic field. For the first time, we have investigated TR of anisotropic crystals. We have shown that the low- frequency modulation appears in the emission (transmission) spectra of uniaxially deformed crystals. The results obtained will serve to widen the knowledge of emissive properties of different plane- parallel objects (say, various films, layers, and coatings). Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics, 2007. V. 10, N 4. P. 94-102. © 2007, V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 102 They may be applied to the monitoring of layer parameters and the proper account of heat exchange and heat transfer as well. References 1. P.J. Hesketh, J.N. Zemel, B. Gerbhart, Organ pipe radiant modes of periodic micromachined silicon surfaces // Nature (London) 324, p. 549-551 (1986). 2. J.-J. Greffet, R. Carminati, K. Joulain, J.-P. Mulet, S. Mainguy, Yong Chen, Coherent emission of light by thermal sources // Nature (London) 416, p. 61-64 (2002). 3. F. Marquier, K. Joulain, J.-P. Mulet, R. Carminati, J.-J. Greffet, Y. Chen, Coherent spontaneous emission of light by thermal sources // Phys. Rev. B 69, 155412 (2004). 4. V.S. Pekar, On the theory of spontaneous and stimulated emission of electromagnetic waves in one-dimensionally inhomogeneous media and resonators // Zhurnal Experiment. Teor. Fiziki 67, p. 471 (1974) (in Russian); Some features of the optical spectra of thin layers // Ibid. 88, p. 667 (1985) (in Russian). 5. A.I. Liptuga, N.B. Shishkina, Thermal radiation of semitransparent plane-parallel objects // Infrared Physics and Technology 44, p. 85-89 (2003). 6. A.G. Kollyukh, A.I. Liptuga, V.A. Morozhenko, V.I. Pipa, Thermal radiation of plane-parallel semitransparent layers // Opt. Communs 225, p. 349-352 (2003). 7. K.Yu. Guga, O.G. Kollyukh, A.I. Liptuga, V.O. Morozhenko, V.I. Pipa, Features of thermal radiation of plane-parallel semiconductor wafers // Semiconductors 38, p. 507-511 (2004). 8. O.G. Kollyukh, A.I. Liptuga, V. Morozhenko, V.I. Pipa, Effect of the optical characteristics of semiconductor resonator structures on the amplitudes of their thermal radiation lines // Opt. Communs 260, p. 607-613 (2006). 9. B.J. Lee, Z.M. Zhang, Design and fabrication of planar multilayer structures with coherent thermal emission characteristics // J. Appl. Phys. 100, 063529 (2006). 10. B.J. Lee, C.G. Fu, Z.M. Zhang, Coherent thermal emission from one-dimensional photonic crystals // Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 071904 (2005). 11. M. Laroche, R. Carminati, J.-J. Greffet, Coherent thermal antenna using a photonic crystal slab // Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 123903 (2006). 12. O.G. Kollyukh, A.I. Liptuga, V.A. Morozhenko, V.I. Pipa, Magnetic-field modulation of the spectrum of coherent thermal radiation of semi- conductor layers // Phys. Rev. B 71, 073306 (2005). 13. O.G. Kollyukh, A.I. Liptuga, V. Morozhenko, V.I. Pipa, E.F. Venger, Circular polarized coherent thermal radiation from semiconductor layers in an external magnetic field // Opt. Communs 276, p. 131-134 (2007). 14. S.M. Rytov, Y.A. Kravtsov, V.I. Tatarskii, Prin- ciples of Statistical Radiophysics, Vol. 3: Elements of Random Fields. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989. 15. S.V. Plyatsko, Yu.S. Gromovoj, F.F. Sizov, Narrow gap IV–VI thin films produced by quasi- continuous-wave CO2-laser-induced evaporation // Thin Solid Films 218, p. 151-156 (1992). 16. R.K. Willardson, A.C. Beer (Eds.), Semiconductors and Semimetals, vol. 3. Academic Press, New York, 1967. 17. O. Madelung, Semiconductors: Data Handbook. Springer, Berlin, 2004.