Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films

We have studied thermostimulated luminenscence and electron emission of nitrogen films and nanoclusters containing atomic nitrogen free radicals. Thermostimulated electron emission from N₂ nanoclusters was ob-served for the first time. Thermostimulated luminescence spectra obtained during N₂–He samp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2013
Hauptverfasser: Boltnev, R.E., Bykhalo, I.B., Krushinskaya, I.N., Pelmenev, A.A., Khmelenko, V.V., Lee, D.M., Khyzhniy, I.V., Uyutnov, S.A., Savchenko, E.V., Ponomaryov, A.N., Gumenchuk, G.B., Bondybey, V.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України 2013
Schriftenreihe:Физика низких температур
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118445
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films / R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, D.M. Lee, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, E.V. Savchenko, A.N. Ponomaryov, G.B. Gumenchuk, V.E. Bondybey // Физика низких температур. — 2013. — Т. 39, № 5. — С. 580–585. — Бібліогр.: 25 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-118445
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1184452017-05-31T03:03:11Z Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films Boltnev, R.E. Bykhalo, I.B. Krushinskaya, I.N. Pelmenev, A.A. Khmelenko, V.V. Lee, D.M. Khyzhniy, I.V. Uyutnov, S.A. Savchenko, E.V. Ponomaryov, A.N. Gumenchuk, G.B. Bondybey, V.E. 9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals We have studied thermostimulated luminenscence and electron emission of nitrogen films and nanoclusters containing atomic nitrogen free radicals. Thermostimulated electron emission from N₂ nanoclusters was ob-served for the first time. Thermostimulated luminescence spectra obtained during N₂–He sample destruction are similar to those detected from N₂ films pre-irradiated by an electron beam. This similarity reveals common mechanisms of energy transfer and relaxation. The correlation of the luminescence intensity and the electron cur-rent in both systems points to the important role of ionic species in relaxation cascades. A sublimation of solid helium shells isolating nitrogen nanoclusters is a trigger for the initiation of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission in these nitrogen–helium condensates. 2013 Article Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films / R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, D.M. Lee, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, E.V. Savchenko, A.N. Ponomaryov, G.B. Gumenchuk, V.E. Bondybey // Физика низких температур. — 2013. — Т. 39, № 5. — С. 580–585. — Бібліогр.: 25 назв. — англ. 0132-6414 PACS: 78.60.Kn, 79.75.+g http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118445 en Физика низких температур Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic 9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals
9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals
spellingShingle 9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals
9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals
Boltnev, R.E.
Bykhalo, I.B.
Krushinskaya, I.N.
Pelmenev, A.A.
Khmelenko, V.V.
Lee, D.M.
Khyzhniy, I.V.
Uyutnov, S.A.
Savchenko, E.V.
Ponomaryov, A.N.
Gumenchuk, G.B.
Bondybey, V.E.
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
Физика низких температур
description We have studied thermostimulated luminenscence and electron emission of nitrogen films and nanoclusters containing atomic nitrogen free radicals. Thermostimulated electron emission from N₂ nanoclusters was ob-served for the first time. Thermostimulated luminescence spectra obtained during N₂–He sample destruction are similar to those detected from N₂ films pre-irradiated by an electron beam. This similarity reveals common mechanisms of energy transfer and relaxation. The correlation of the luminescence intensity and the electron cur-rent in both systems points to the important role of ionic species in relaxation cascades. A sublimation of solid helium shells isolating nitrogen nanoclusters is a trigger for the initiation of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission in these nitrogen–helium condensates.
format Article
author Boltnev, R.E.
Bykhalo, I.B.
Krushinskaya, I.N.
Pelmenev, A.A.
Khmelenko, V.V.
Lee, D.M.
Khyzhniy, I.V.
Uyutnov, S.A.
Savchenko, E.V.
Ponomaryov, A.N.
Gumenchuk, G.B.
Bondybey, V.E.
author_facet Boltnev, R.E.
Bykhalo, I.B.
Krushinskaya, I.N.
Pelmenev, A.A.
Khmelenko, V.V.
Lee, D.M.
Khyzhniy, I.V.
Uyutnov, S.A.
Savchenko, E.V.
Ponomaryov, A.N.
Gumenchuk, G.B.
Bondybey, V.E.
author_sort Boltnev, R.E.
title Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
title_short Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
title_full Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
title_fullStr Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
title_sort comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
publisher Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
publishDate 2013
topic_facet 9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118445
citation_txt Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films / R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, D.M. Lee, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, E.V. Savchenko, A.N. Ponomaryov, G.B. Gumenchuk, V.E. Bondybey // Физика низких температур. — 2013. — Т. 39, № 5. — С. 580–585. — Бібліогр.: 25 назв. — англ.
series Физика низких температур
work_keys_str_mv AT boltnevre comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT bykhaloib comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT krushinskayain comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT pelmenevaa comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT khmelenkovv comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT leedm comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT khyzhniyiv comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT uyutnovsa comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT savchenkoev comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT ponomaryovan comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT gumenchukgb comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
AT bondybeyve comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms
first_indexed 2025-07-08T13:59:55Z
last_indexed 2025-07-08T13:59:55Z
_version_ 1837087532351750144
fulltext © R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, D.M. Lee, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, E.V. Savchenko, A.N. Ponomaryov, G.B. Gumenchuk, and V.E. Bondybey, 2013 Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5, pp. 580–585 Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films R.E. Boltnev 1 , I.B. Bykhalo 1 , I.N. Krushinskaya 1 , A.A. Pelmenev 1 , V.V. Khmelenko 2 , D.M. Lee 2 , I.V. Khyzhniy 3 , S.A. Uyutnov 3 , E.V. Savchenko 3 , A.N. Ponomaryov 4 , G.B. Gumenchuk 5 , and V.E. Bondybey 5 1 Branch of Institute of Energy Problems of Chemical Physics RAS, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia E-mail: boltnev@gmail.com 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 3 B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine 47 Lenin Ave., Kharkov 61103, Ukraine 4 Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden 01328, Germany 5 Lehrstuhl für Physikalische Chemie II TUM, Garching b. München 85747, Germany Received December 5, 2012 We have studied thermostimulated luminenscence and electron emission of nitrogen films and nanoclusters containing atomic nitrogen free radicals. Thermostimulated electron emission from N2 nanoclusters was ob- served for the first time. Thermostimulated luminescence spectra obtained during N2–He sample destruction are similar to those detected from N2 films pre-irradiated by an electron beam. This similarity reveals common mechanisms of energy transfer and relaxation. The correlation of the luminescence intensity and the electron cur- rent in both systems points to the important role of ionic species in relaxation cascades. A sublimation of solid helium shells isolating nitrogen nanoclusters is a trigger for the initiation of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission in these nitrogen–helium condensates. PACS: 78.60.Kn Thermoluminescence; 79.75.+g Exoelectron emission. Keywords: solid helium, cryogenic electrolytes, ion dipole gas, phonon spectrum. Introduction Accumulation of reactive particles in nitrogen and ni- trogen-containing solids has been a problem of particular interest for years [1–3]. A great breakthrough was made by use of a gas jet condensation technique [4,5] and the local concentrations of N atoms up to 10 21 cm –3 were recently achieved in impurity–helium condensates (IHCs) [6]. IHCs are formed by impurity nanoclusters providing large total surface area favorable for stabilization of radicals. We have never registered any ions in impurity–helium condensates during previous ESR and optical spectroscopy studies. In this work we present the first observation of ions in IHCs and discuss our recent results of studies of the thermally stimulated luminescence (TSL) and electron emission (TSEE) of nitrogen nanoclusters and films. Ionic nitrogen radicals were studied in solid films of neon [7–9] and mo- lecular nitrogen [10]. Formation and relaxation of many excited complexes (including ionic ones) in solid films of rare gases and N2 have been well studied [11–13]. More- over, crystals of solid 4 He (so-called “icebergs”) doped by metal particles can store rather high density of ions ~ 10 14 –10 15 cm –3 [14]. Such icebergs remain solid below the melting curve of 4 He. This observation gives us a facinating example of metastable Coulomb systems in condensed helium. A deep understanding of relaxation processes involving both neutral and charged species in such energetic materials as IHCs can provide for further advances in energy accumulation in cryogenic media. Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5 581 Experimental setups A gas jet condensation technique [4,5] was used to ac- cumulate nitrogen nanoclusters in superfluid helium. A gas mixture of N2 (1%) and He was transported from a room temperature gas handling system to the cryogenic region. Nitrogen atoms were produced by dissociation of N2 mole- cules by using a high-power radiofrequency (RF) discharge (f ~ 40 MHz, P ~ 40 W) applied to electrodes placed around the quartz capillary carrying the mixed gases. The resulting jet of helium gas with nitrogen particles emerging from the quartz capillary was directed onto the surface of superfluid 4 He contained in a glass beaker. A fountain pump situated in the bottom part of the optical glass dewar maintained a constant liquid helium level in the beaker. During the cooling of the gas jet, at first nitrogen nano- clusters are formed. When the temperature gets lower, he- lium atoms are adsorbed on the surface of the nitrogen clusters. The temperature during sample preparation was about 1.5 K. As the jet penetrated the surface of the liquid helium, a macroscopic snow-like translucent material con- sisting of nitrogen nanoclusters isolated by solid helium shells was created. A jet with a flux of ~ 5·10 19 atoms and molecules per second yielded ~ 0.3–0.4 cm 3 of sample in 10 min. Warming the sample when removed from bulk liquid helium initiates evaporation of helium layers, giving rise to direct contact between neighboring cluster surfaces, accompanied by recombination of the reactive species. During the sample warm-up the TSL spectra were repeat- edly detected with an Ocean Optics spectrometer HR2000+ in the range 200–1100 nm with the exposure time of 1 s. The glass dewars and beaker restricted the accessible spec- tral range between 325 and 1100 nm. The optical resolu- tion of the spectrometer was of order 1.3 nm (FWHM). For the first time we observed electrical currents accompany- ing the destruction of nitrogen–helium samples collected on an electrode held at the positive potential (9 V). A sig- nal collected by the electrode was digitized with a picoam- meter (Keithley 6485). In another series of experiments, solid nitrogen films were grown in two ways: by deposition of nitrogen gas under an electron beam or by deposition of neutral gas which was then irradiated with an electron beam of a given energy, which can be varied from 500 eV to 2 keV. The high-purity (99.9995%) gas was deposited on a metal sub- strate cooled to 6 K in a vacuum chamber with the base pressure 10 –8 mbar. The presence of impurities was moni- tored spectroscopically. The main impurity appeared to be oxygen. The resulting condensates were polycrystalline films of 100 μm thickness. Note that the samples with an open surface are accessible to luminescence studies in the temperature range up to 36 K, the range of existence of the Pa3 structure ( phase). Transition to the  phase at 35.6 K in such films was detected previously by the TSEE technique [13]; however the intense sublimation of nitro- gen films limits studies of their spectroscopy at higher tem- peratures. The luminescence spectra in these experiments were also recorded repeatedly for the exposure time requir- ed to monitor the formation and accumulation of excited species. On completion of irradiation, afterglow and “after- emission” of electrons were detected. When these effects decayed completely, samples of solid N2 were heated at a constant rate. The temperatures required for sample prepa- ration and the heating rate were controlled with a silicon diode sensor mounted at the substrate which was connect- ed to a temperature controller (Leybold LTC 60). Yields of spectrally resolved thermally stimulated luminescence and exoelectron current were detected in a time-correlated fashion. The TSL spectra in the range 170–870 nm were recorded using an Ocean Optics spectrometer S2000, the TSEE current was detected with an electrode kept at +9 V, and amplified by a FEMTO DLPCA 200 current amplifier. More detailed descriptions of the experimental setup can be found elsewhere [15,16]. Experimental results The time dependences of the current, the temperature and the integrated (in the range from 300 up to 1100 nm) luminescence intensity obtained during warm-up and de- struction of nitrogen–helium sample are shown in Fig. 1. In the case of highly porous impurity–helium sample, a warm- up of its different parts is not uniform due to poor thermal conductivity and there is no direct relation between the thermometer temperature and the temperature of the react- ing part (which emits light). We can only estimate the tem- perature of the complete sample destruction (when the last part of the sample is burned out). This temperature is about 12 K (Fig. 1). We have missed some current counts at the beginning of the warm-up due to a late start of picoammeter software. Nevertheless one can see a correlation between the current and the integrated luminescence intensity. This means that the main trigger for nitrogen–helium sample Fig. 1. (Color online) The time dependence of the current (black line with hollow circles), the integrated luminescence intensity (blue line), and the temperature (red line with solid circles) de- tected during warm-up and destruction of a nitrogen–helium sample. R.E. Boltnev et al. 582 Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5 destruction is the evaporation of helium atoms from the impurity nanocluster surfaces which occurs for tempera- tures above 2 K. If energetic nitrogen–helium samples with high-energy content warmed up at low pressure (less than 500 Pa) they sublimated at temperatures below 12–14 K. Some delay of the current peaks relative to the lumines- cence flashes can be explained by thermo- and photostimu- lated mechanisms of electron de-trapping, when the intense recombination of N atoms stabilized mainly on the cluster surfaces produces a bright emission and accelerates the sample warming. As demonstrated in [17,18], the electron emission from RG solids containing charge centers can be stimulated by both irradiation with photons and sample warming. The recent observations of the TSEE from solid nitro- gen [13] provide a new means for investigating the relaxa- tion processes occurring in solid nitrogen by simultaneous- ly using the optical and current activation spectroscopy methods. As mentioned above, after completion of the sample irradiation the well-known [19] long lived after- glow (the so-called  group) at the wavelength of the 2 D 4 S doubly forbidden transition of N atom (522 nm) appears, with a characteristic decay time  of about 37 s. We observed also a persistent after-emission of electrons exhibiting two exponential decays, one with 1 = 37 s, co- inciding with the afterglow decay time , and the another with a longer 2 about 215 s. Before starting the warm-up experiments and recording the “glow curves”, both the afterglow and the after-emis- sion were allowed to drop to zero, indicating that all the excited N atoms produced under irradiation had sufficient time to return to the ground state. The actual curves show- ing the temperature dependence of the TSEE and the spec- trally resolved thermally stimulated luminescence TSL over the range of the  phase existence obtained during the warm-up of a nitrogen film are presented in Fig. 2, where for the TSL curve, the  group being the most intense line was monitored. The TSL shows a wide feature with maxi- mum peaked at 16 K and a “high temperature” shoulder which extends up to 30 K. The TSEE curve at low temper- atures consists of two overlapping peaks at 15 and 16 K with an extended “high temperature” tail. The TSEE yield exhibits a sharp increase as the phase transition to the  phase is approached. Besides the  group, we also moni- tored the TSL at 793 nm, the wavelength of the so-called “ line” — an unidentified line. The similarity of the glow curves detected at 793 and 522 nm shown in Fig. 2 implies a similar mechanism for a population of the emitting states. Elucidation of the processes resulting in -line emission requires further study. The dynamics of TSL spectra during warm-up of a nitro- gen–helium sample and a “pure” solid nitrogen film are shown in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively. We should note that reappearance of the 522.7 and the 555.5 nm lines in the TSL spectra from a nitrogen solid film was not reproducible (Fig. 4). In fact, we observed Fig. 2. The thermostimulated electron emission and the lumines- cence intensities at 522 and 793 nm of a solid nitrogen film pre- irradiated with a 1 keV electron beam. Fig. 3. Dynamics of thermoluminescence spectra of a nitrogen– helium sample. Every 2nd of the spectra measured is shown. Fig. 4. Dynamics of thermoluminescence spectra of a solid nitro- gen film. Every 20th of the spectra measured is shown. Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5 583 some flashes in samples and films containing minor ad- mixture of oxygen. The similar effect was mentioned in earlier work, e.g., [20]. The most intense flash spectrum detected during the ni- trogen–helium sample destruction is shown in Fig. 5. Vari- ous different states of atomic and molecular nitrogen along with those of atomic oxygen involved in the energy relaxa- tion processes. The  and  groups corresponding to the transitions N ( 2 D 4 S) and O ( 1 S 1 D) dominate the spec- trum. Weak Vegard–Kaplan bands of N2 molecules, the ', , and '' groups of N atoms, and the  line are also shown in the spectrum. The typical TSL spectrum detected during a warm-up of the solid nitrogen film pre-irradiated with an electron beam is shown in Fig. 6. The spectrum is rather similar to the one shown in Fig. 5. The spectral features of the TSL observed from the N2–He sample and the N2 film together with their identifications are summarized in Table 1. The positions of the spectral features observed are close to the ones known for N2 molecules, N and O atoms in N2 matrices. Keeping in mind the spectral resolution of the spectrometers used in these studies, the agreement of the results obtained with clusters and solid films with the pub- lished data on emission from N2 matrices is quite satisfac- tory. Table 1. The spectral features of TSL observed from the N2–He sample and the N2 film, their identification and positions in com- parison with literature data T S L o f n it ro g en – h el iu m s am p le W av el en g th , n m T S L o f n it ro g en fi lm W av el en g th , n m Id en ti fi ca ti o n , p o si ti o n i n e m is si o n sp ec tr a o f N 2 m a- tr ix , n m R ef er en ce 339.6 365.8 395.3 (very weak and broad) bands of Vegard– Kaplan system: 0–9, 338.6 0–10, 364.4 0–11, 395 [21] 522.6 522.7 α group, N ( 2 D 4 S), 523 [20] 557.4 555.5 β group, O ( 1 S 1 D), 554.2 [20] 594.4 594 α’ group, 594.5 [20] 794.4 792.6 γ line, 793.5 (upon irradiation) [20] 858.5 855.1 δ’’ group, 856 [20] 1047.7 beyond the oper- ating range of the spectrometer δ group, N ( 2 P 2 D), 1045 [20] Discussion Generaly, the TSL spectra obtained during the N2–He sample warm-up are similar to those detected from the N2 films, while the final destruction temperature of nitrogen– helium sample is close to the temperature at which the TSEE and TSL start in nitrogen films. In both systems we observed strong the  and  groups, the ' and '' groups of N atoms, an unidentified  line and Vegard–Kaplan bands of N2 molecules. It means that similar energy trans- fer and relaxation channels are involved in both systems studied. Some small quantitative differences observed in the spectra can be easily understood. For example, the more intense  group observed in the TSL spectrum of the nitrogen–helium sample (Fig. 5) can be simply explained by the higher oxygen content in the sample. Close inspec- tion of the TSL dynamics of nitrogen films shows that the ratio of the intensities of  and ′ groups, I/I′ (about 70), is somewhat smaller than that in nitrogen–helium samples (I/I′ = 80) [5]. The intensity of the  group emission of O atoms is comparable with the intensity of  group emis- sions of N atoms because of the much higher (~10 7 times) Fig. 5. The most intense flash spectrum detected during the nitro- gen–helium sample destruction. Fig. 6. The TSL spectrum detected at 16 K during the solid nitro- gen film warm-up. R.E. Boltnev et al. 584 Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5 probability of the O ( 1 S 1 D) transition as compared with the N ( 2 D 4 S) transition. The main source of oxygen in nitrogen–helium samples are different impurities such as O2, OH, H2O in gaseous helium giving totally ~ 10 ppm. Although the concentration of stabilized N atoms in solid N2 matrix is three orders of magnitude larger than that of the O atoms, the significantly larger transition probability of O atoms leads to a noticeable emission from the O at- oms. An oxygen impurity also appears in the nitrogen film studies from residual gases in the deposition chamber es- pecially at low gas flow rate. It is notable that the TSEE currents detected for both sys- tems correlated with the corresponding TSL signals, point- ing to the important role of the ionic species in the relaxa- tion cascades. The intense release of negative charge carriers from the nitrogen–helium sample beginning at temperatures below 8–10 K indicates that electrons are the best candidates to be the charge carriers. The observation of three electron emission peaks (see Fig. 1) may lead to the destruction of different regions of the impurity–helium sample because of its inhomogeneous warm-up, which releases the electrons from these regions. Alternatively, the observed peaks may be explained by the existence of a corresponding number of electron traps with different acti- vation energies. The lowest temperature peak may be relat- ed to the release of electrons from “bubbles” destroyed during liquid helium evaporation. As is known, electrons are self-trapped in liquid helium via the “bubble” structure formation [22]. In the TSL of nitrogen films a broad main peak at 16 K with an extended “high temperature” shoulder dominates the TSL glow curve. This suggests a relatively wide distri- bution of trap depths and activation energies for stored charges. An average activation energy deduced by the half- width method [23] for traps which form the 16 K peak is about 14 meV. Close correlation of the TSL detected for the  group and TSEE current at temperatures up to 25 K suggests that this luminescence arises from the neutraliza- tion reaction of the ionic species N + with electrons detrap- ped upon the warm-up of the nitrogen film: N + + e – → N * . This appears plausible taking into account that the ioniza- tion potential of the N atom is 14.53 eV is lower than that for nitrogen molecule (15.58 eV). Despite the firm data on TSEE from solid nitrogen films [13] there is still an inter- esting question regarding the presence and specific nature of positive ions. Molecular ions 2N and 4N had been detected by ESR spectroscopy [7,8] and IR absorption [9] in neon matrices. These ions were formed in the neon ma- trix by electron bombardment and photoionization. Note that they were detected only when N2/Ne ratio was greater than 1/600 and a quenching reactant was codeposited with the nitrogen [8]. Up to now, in our ESR and optical spec- troscopy studies we did not observe the ion presence in either nitrogen–helium or nitrogen–neon–helium samples. However quite recently the presence of 4N in the electron bombarded solid nitrogen films was revealed using current and optical activation spectroscopy in the VUV range [10]. The tetranitrogen cation 4N manifested itself by the dis- sociative recombination reaction with an electron released from the trap upon warm-up: 1 – 4 2 2 2 2 *N e N N ( ) N Nua h          (VUV). An application of the RF discharge almost excludes the possibility of trapping predominantly the charges of one sign in impurity–helium condensates. The origin as well as the specific nature of ions in impurity–helium condensates produced by RF discharge is still unclear. There are two main possibilities for creating ions in IHCs: (1) during a gas jet condensation, ions formed in an RF discharge re- gion (possibly, due to deep UV irradition of the clusters from the helium gas discharge) can be trapped by growing impurity clusters (moreover, they themselves can be nucle- ation centers due to the higher polarizability); (2) the ioni- zation of particles during the sample destruction due to interaction of excited atoms and molecules following the recombination of stored radicals. The first possibility ap- pears more preferred because of our spectroscopic observa- tion of 2N ions in the condensing gas jet [24]. It is now well known that sublimation of solid helium shells isolat- ing the impurity nanoclusters triggers the recombination of radicals stabilized on surfaces of the clusters and gives rise to the thermostimulated luminescence [5,25]. The electron emission from nitrogen–helium condensates at the same time as the TSL suggests a similar allocation of electrons, on the surfaces or in outer layers of the nitrogen clusters. Conclusions 1. Thermostimulated electron emission in nitrogen– helium condensates during their destruction was observed for the first time. 2. The same energy relaxation pathways were thermally initiated in nitrogen nanoclusters and films prepared by different techniques. The earlier start (at lower tempera- tures) of the thermoluminescence and the electron emission from nitrogen nanoclusters is determined by intense re- combination of nitrogen atoms stabilized on clusters’ sur- faces following evaporation of solid helium shells sur- rounding the clusters. 3. Thermostimulated luminescence and electron emis- sion observed during warm-up of nitrogen–helium conden- sates and nitrogen films demonstrate the similarity of the processes initiated, including the neutralization of the ionic species. 4. The electron emission from nitrogen–helium samples upon their destruction can be explained either by a capture of ions in nitrogen nanoclusters during the sample prepa- ration or by the creation of the ions as a result of interac- tion of excited atoms and molecules during the sample de- struction. Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5 585 The study was supported by grants No. 010366-0137-2009 Norman Hackerman Advanced Research Program, NSF No. DMR 1209255, RFBR Nos. 11-02-92500-CRDF-E_a and 11-08-01232-а, CRDF No. RUP1-7025-CG-11, federal contract 11.519.11.6021 with Russian Federation Ministry of Education and Science. E.S., I.Kh. and S.U. thank Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for the travel grant. 1. A.M. Bass and H.P. Broida, Formation and Trapping of Free Radicals, Academic Press, New York (1960). 2. P.C. Samartzis and A.M. Wodtke, Intern. Rev. Phys. Chem. 25, 527 (2006). 3. Y. Shi and D.W. Brenner, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 134503 (2007). 4. E.B. Gordon, L.P. Mezhov-Deglin, and O.F. Pugachev, JETP Lett. 19, 103 (1974). 5. V.V. Khmelenko, I.N. Krushinskaya, R.E. Boltnev, I.B. By- khalo, A.A. Pelmenev, and D.M. Lee, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 38, 871 (2012) [Low Temp. Phys. 38, 688 (2012)]. 6. S. Mao, R.E. Boltnev, V.V. Khmelenko, and D.M. Lee, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 38, 1313 (2012) [Low Temp. Phys. 38, 1037 (2012)]. 7. L.B. Knight, Jr., J.M. Bostick, R.W. Woodward, and J. Steadman, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 6415 (1983). 8. L.B. Knight, Jr., K.D. Johannessen, D.C. Cobranchi, E.A. Earl, D. Feller, and E.R. Davidson, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 885 (1987). 9. M.E. Jacox, Research on Chemical Intermediates 12, 33 (1989). 10. E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, G.B. Gu- menchuk, M.K. Beyer, A.N. Ponomaryov, and V.E. Bondy- bey, will be submitted to J. Chem. Phys. 11. G. Gumenchuk, A. Ponomaryov, I. Khyzhniy, S. Uyutnov, E. Savchenko, and V. Bondybey, Phys. Proc. 2, 441 (2009). 12. E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, G.B. Gu- menchuk, A.N. Ponomaryov, and V.E. Bondybey, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 35, 520 (2009) [Low Temp. Phys. 35, 409 (2009)]. 13. I. Khyzhniy, E. Savchenko, S. Uyutnov, G. Gumenchuk, A. Ponomaryov, and V. Bondybey, Rad. Meas. 45, 353 (2010). 14. P. Moroshkin, V. Lebedev, and A. Weis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 115301 (2009). 15. A.N. Ponomaryov, E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, G.B. Gumenchuk, M. Frankowski, and V.E. Bondybey, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 33, 705 (2007) [Low Temp. Phys. 33, 532 (2007)]. 16. A. Ponomaryov, G. Gumenchuk, E. Savchenko, and V.E. Bondybey, Phys. Chem. Phys. 9, 1329 (2007). 17. E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khizhniy, G.B. Gumenchuk, A.N. Po- nomaryov, and V.E. Bondybey, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 32, 1417 (2006) [Low Temp. Phys. 32, 1078 (2006)]. 18. E.V. Savchenko, A.G. Belov, G.B. Gumenchuk, A.N. Pono- maryov, M.K. Beyer, V.E. Bondybey, and M. Frankowski, Rad. Phys. & Chem. 76, 577 (2007). 19. A. Lofthus and P.H. Krupenie, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 6, 113 (1977). 20. M. Peyron, E.M. Hörl, H.W. Brown, and H.P. Broida, J. Chem. Phys. 30, 1304 (1959). 21. Yu.B. Poltoratski and I.Ya. Fugol, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 5, 925 (1979) [Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 5, 439 (1979)]. 22. J. Jortner, N.R. Kestner, S.A. Rice, and M.H. Cohen, J. Chem. Phys. 43, 2614 (1965). 23. D.R. Vij, Thermoluminescence, in: Luminescence of Solids, D.R. Vij (ed.), Plenum Press, New York (1998), p. 271. 24. E.B. Gordon, M.V. Martynenko, A.A. Pelmenev, O.F. Puga- chev, and V.V. Khmelenko, Khim. Fiz. 13, 15 (1994). 25. V.V. Khmelenko, A.A. Pelmenev, I.N. Krushinskaya, I.B. By- khalo, R.E. Boltnev, and D.M. Lee, Accepted for publication in J. Low Temp. Phys., DOI: 10.1007/s10909-012-0707-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10909-012-0707-3