Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
We have studied thermostimulated luminenscence and electron emission of nitrogen films and nanoclusters containing atomic nitrogen free radicals. Thermostimulated electron emission from N₂ nanoclusters was ob-served for the first time. Thermostimulated luminescence spectra obtained during N₂–He samp...
Gespeichert in:
Datum: | 2013 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
2013
|
Schriftenreihe: | Физика низких температур |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118445 |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Zitieren: | Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films / R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, D.M. Lee, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, E.V. Savchenko, A.N. Ponomaryov, G.B. Gumenchuk, V.E. Bondybey // Физика низких температур. — 2013. — Т. 39, № 5. — С. 580–585. — Бібліогр.: 25 назв. — англ. |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraineid |
irk-123456789-118445 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
irk-123456789-1184452017-05-31T03:03:11Z Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films Boltnev, R.E. Bykhalo, I.B. Krushinskaya, I.N. Pelmenev, A.A. Khmelenko, V.V. Lee, D.M. Khyzhniy, I.V. Uyutnov, S.A. Savchenko, E.V. Ponomaryov, A.N. Gumenchuk, G.B. Bondybey, V.E. 9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals We have studied thermostimulated luminenscence and electron emission of nitrogen films and nanoclusters containing atomic nitrogen free radicals. Thermostimulated electron emission from N₂ nanoclusters was ob-served for the first time. Thermostimulated luminescence spectra obtained during N₂–He sample destruction are similar to those detected from N₂ films pre-irradiated by an electron beam. This similarity reveals common mechanisms of energy transfer and relaxation. The correlation of the luminescence intensity and the electron cur-rent in both systems points to the important role of ionic species in relaxation cascades. A sublimation of solid helium shells isolating nitrogen nanoclusters is a trigger for the initiation of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission in these nitrogen–helium condensates. 2013 Article Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films / R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, D.M. Lee, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, E.V. Savchenko, A.N. Ponomaryov, G.B. Gumenchuk, V.E. Bondybey // Физика низких температур. — 2013. — Т. 39, № 5. — С. 580–585. — Бібліогр.: 25 назв. — англ. 0132-6414 PACS: 78.60.Kn, 79.75.+g http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118445 en Физика низких температур Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України |
institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
collection |
DSpace DC |
language |
English |
topic |
9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals 9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals |
spellingShingle |
9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals 9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals Boltnev, R.E. Bykhalo, I.B. Krushinskaya, I.N. Pelmenev, A.A. Khmelenko, V.V. Lee, D.M. Khyzhniy, I.V. Uyutnov, S.A. Savchenko, E.V. Ponomaryov, A.N. Gumenchuk, G.B. Bondybey, V.E. Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films Физика низких температур |
description |
We have studied thermostimulated luminenscence and electron emission of nitrogen films and nanoclusters containing atomic nitrogen free radicals. Thermostimulated electron emission from N₂ nanoclusters was ob-served for the first time. Thermostimulated luminescence spectra obtained during N₂–He sample destruction are similar to those detected from N₂ films pre-irradiated by an electron beam. This similarity reveals common mechanisms of energy transfer and relaxation. The correlation of the luminescence intensity and the electron cur-rent in both systems points to the important role of ionic species in relaxation cascades. A sublimation of solid helium shells isolating nitrogen nanoclusters is a trigger for the initiation of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission in these nitrogen–helium condensates. |
format |
Article |
author |
Boltnev, R.E. Bykhalo, I.B. Krushinskaya, I.N. Pelmenev, A.A. Khmelenko, V.V. Lee, D.M. Khyzhniy, I.V. Uyutnov, S.A. Savchenko, E.V. Ponomaryov, A.N. Gumenchuk, G.B. Bondybey, V.E. |
author_facet |
Boltnev, R.E. Bykhalo, I.B. Krushinskaya, I.N. Pelmenev, A.A. Khmelenko, V.V. Lee, D.M. Khyzhniy, I.V. Uyutnov, S.A. Savchenko, E.V. Ponomaryov, A.N. Gumenchuk, G.B. Bondybey, V.E. |
author_sort |
Boltnev, R.E. |
title |
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films |
title_short |
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films |
title_full |
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films |
title_sort |
comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films |
publisher |
Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України |
publishDate |
2013 |
topic_facet |
9th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals |
url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118445 |
citation_txt |
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films / R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, D.M. Lee, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, E.V. Savchenko, A.N. Ponomaryov, G.B. Gumenchuk, V.E. Bondybey // Физика низких температур. — 2013. — Т. 39, № 5. — С. 580–585. — Бібліогр.: 25 назв. — англ. |
series |
Физика низких температур |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT boltnevre comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT bykhaloib comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT krushinskayain comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT pelmenevaa comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT khmelenkovv comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT leedm comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT khyzhniyiv comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT uyutnovsa comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT savchenkoev comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT ponomaryovan comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT gumenchukgb comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms AT bondybeyve comparativestudyofthermostimulatedluminescenceandelectronemissionofnitrogennanoclustersandfilms |
first_indexed |
2025-07-08T13:59:55Z |
last_indexed |
2025-07-08T13:59:55Z |
_version_ |
1837087532351750144 |
fulltext |
© R.E. Boltnev, I.B. Bykhalo, I.N. Krushinskaya, A.A. Pelmenev, V.V. Khmelenko, D.M. Lee, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov,
E.V. Savchenko, A.N. Ponomaryov,
G.B. Gumenchuk, and V.E. Bondybey, 2013
Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5, pp. 580–585
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence
and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
R.E. Boltnev
1
, I.B. Bykhalo
1
, I.N. Krushinskaya
1
, A.A. Pelmenev
1
, V.V. Khmelenko
2
,
D.M. Lee
2
, I.V. Khyzhniy
3
, S.A. Uyutnov
3
, E.V. Savchenko
3
, A.N. Ponomaryov
4
,
G.B. Gumenchuk
5
, and V.E. Bondybey
5
1
Branch of Institute of Energy Problems of Chemical Physics RAS, Chernogolovka 142432, Russia
E-mail: boltnev@gmail.com
2
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
3
B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
47 Lenin Ave., Kharkov 61103, Ukraine
4
Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden 01328, Germany
5
Lehrstuhl für Physikalische Chemie II TUM, Garching b. München 85747, Germany
Received December 5, 2012
We have studied thermostimulated luminenscence and electron emission of nitrogen films and nanoclusters
containing atomic nitrogen free radicals. Thermostimulated electron emission from N2 nanoclusters was ob-
served for the first time. Thermostimulated luminescence spectra obtained during N2–He sample destruction are
similar to those detected from N2 films pre-irradiated by an electron beam. This similarity reveals common
mechanisms of energy transfer and relaxation. The correlation of the luminescence intensity and the electron cur-
rent in both systems points to the important role of ionic species in relaxation cascades. A sublimation of solid
helium shells isolating nitrogen nanoclusters is a trigger for the initiation of thermostimulated luminescence and
electron emission in these nitrogen–helium condensates.
PACS: 78.60.Kn Thermoluminescence;
79.75.+g Exoelectron emission.
Keywords: solid helium, cryogenic electrolytes, ion dipole gas, phonon spectrum.
Introduction
Accumulation of reactive particles in nitrogen and ni-
trogen-containing solids has been a problem of particular
interest for years [1–3]. A great breakthrough was made by
use of a gas jet condensation technique [4,5] and the local
concentrations of N atoms up to 10
21
cm
–3
were recently
achieved in impurity–helium condensates (IHCs) [6]. IHCs
are formed by impurity nanoclusters providing large total
surface area favorable for stabilization of radicals. We have
never registered any ions in impurity–helium condensates
during previous ESR and optical spectroscopy studies. In
this work we present the first observation of ions in IHCs
and discuss our recent results of studies of the thermally
stimulated luminescence (TSL) and electron emission
(TSEE) of nitrogen nanoclusters and films. Ionic nitrogen
radicals were studied in solid films of neon [7–9] and mo-
lecular nitrogen [10]. Formation and relaxation of many
excited complexes (including ionic ones) in solid films of
rare gases and N2 have been well studied [11–13]. More-
over, crystals of solid
4
He (so-called “icebergs”) doped
by metal particles can store rather high density of ions
~ 10
14
–10
15
cm
–3
[14]. Such icebergs remain solid below
the melting curve of
4
He. This observation gives us a
facinating example of metastable Coulomb systems in
condensed helium. A deep understanding of relaxation
processes involving both neutral and charged species in
such energetic materials as IHCs can provide for further
advances in energy accumulation in cryogenic media.
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5 581
Experimental setups
A gas jet condensation technique [4,5] was used to ac-
cumulate nitrogen nanoclusters in superfluid helium. A gas
mixture of N2 (1%) and He was transported from a room
temperature gas handling system to the cryogenic region.
Nitrogen atoms were produced by dissociation of N2 mole-
cules by using a high-power radiofrequency (RF) discharge
(f ~ 40 MHz, P ~ 40 W) applied to electrodes placed
around the quartz capillary carrying the mixed gases. The
resulting jet of helium gas with nitrogen particles emerging
from the quartz capillary was directed onto the surface of
superfluid
4
He contained in a glass beaker. A fountain
pump situated in the bottom part of the optical glass dewar
maintained a constant liquid helium level in the beaker.
During the cooling of the gas jet, at first nitrogen nano-
clusters are formed. When the temperature gets lower, he-
lium atoms are adsorbed on the surface of the nitrogen
clusters. The temperature during sample preparation was
about 1.5 K. As the jet penetrated the surface of the liquid
helium, a macroscopic snow-like translucent material con-
sisting of nitrogen nanoclusters isolated by solid helium
shells was created. A jet with a flux of ~ 5·10
19
atoms and
molecules per second yielded ~ 0.3–0.4 cm
3
of sample in
10 min. Warming the sample when removed from bulk
liquid helium initiates evaporation of helium layers, giving
rise to direct contact between neighboring cluster surfaces,
accompanied by recombination of the reactive species.
During the sample warm-up the TSL spectra were repeat-
edly detected with an Ocean Optics spectrometer HR2000+
in the range 200–1100 nm with the exposure time of 1 s.
The glass dewars and beaker restricted the accessible spec-
tral range between 325 and 1100 nm. The optical resolu-
tion of the spectrometer was of order 1.3 nm (FWHM). For
the first time we observed electrical currents accompany-
ing the destruction of nitrogen–helium samples collected
on an electrode held at the positive potential (9 V). A sig-
nal collected by the electrode was digitized with a picoam-
meter (Keithley 6485).
In another series of experiments, solid nitrogen films
were grown in two ways: by deposition of nitrogen gas
under an electron beam or by deposition of neutral gas
which was then irradiated with an electron beam of a given
energy, which can be varied from 500 eV to 2 keV. The
high-purity (99.9995%) gas was deposited on a metal sub-
strate cooled to 6 K in a vacuum chamber with the base
pressure 10
–8
mbar. The presence of impurities was moni-
tored spectroscopically. The main impurity appeared to be
oxygen. The resulting condensates were polycrystalline
films of 100 μm thickness. Note that the samples with an
open surface are accessible to luminescence studies in the
temperature range up to 36 K, the range of existence of
the Pa3 structure ( phase). Transition to the phase at
35.6 K in such films was detected previously by the TSEE
technique [13]; however the intense sublimation of nitro-
gen films limits studies of their spectroscopy at higher tem-
peratures. The luminescence spectra in these experiments
were also recorded repeatedly for the exposure time requir-
ed to monitor the formation and accumulation of excited
species. On completion of irradiation, afterglow and “after-
emission” of electrons were detected. When these effects
decayed completely, samples of solid N2 were heated at a
constant rate. The temperatures required for sample prepa-
ration and the heating rate were controlled with a silicon
diode sensor mounted at the substrate which was connect-
ed to a temperature controller (Leybold LTC 60). Yields of
spectrally resolved thermally stimulated luminescence and
exoelectron current were detected in a time-correlated
fashion. The TSL spectra in the range 170–870 nm were
recorded using an Ocean Optics spectrometer S2000, the
TSEE current was detected with an electrode kept at +9 V,
and amplified by a FEMTO DLPCA 200 current amplifier.
More detailed descriptions of the experimental setup can
be found elsewhere [15,16].
Experimental results
The time dependences of the current, the temperature
and the integrated (in the range from 300 up to 1100 nm)
luminescence intensity obtained during warm-up and de-
struction of nitrogen–helium sample are shown in Fig. 1. In
the case of highly porous impurity–helium sample, a warm-
up of its different parts is not uniform due to poor thermal
conductivity and there is no direct relation between the
thermometer temperature and the temperature of the react-
ing part (which emits light). We can only estimate the tem-
perature of the complete sample destruction (when the last
part of the sample is burned out). This temperature is about
12 K (Fig. 1). We have missed some current counts at the
beginning of the warm-up due to a late start of picoammeter
software. Nevertheless one can see a correlation between
the current and the integrated luminescence intensity. This
means that the main trigger for nitrogen–helium sample
Fig. 1. (Color online) The time dependence of the current (black
line with hollow circles), the integrated luminescence intensity
(blue line), and the temperature (red line with solid circles) de-
tected during warm-up and destruction of a nitrogen–helium
sample.
R.E. Boltnev et al.
582 Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5
destruction is the evaporation of helium atoms from the
impurity nanocluster surfaces which occurs for tempera-
tures above 2 K. If energetic nitrogen–helium samples with
high-energy content warmed up at low pressure (less than
500 Pa) they sublimated at temperatures below 12–14 K.
Some delay of the current peaks relative to the lumines-
cence flashes can be explained by thermo- and photostimu-
lated mechanisms of electron de-trapping, when the intense
recombination of N atoms stabilized mainly on the cluster
surfaces produces a bright emission and accelerates the
sample warming. As demonstrated in [17,18], the electron
emission from RG solids containing charge centers can be
stimulated by both irradiation with photons and sample
warming.
The recent observations of the TSEE from solid nitro-
gen [13] provide a new means for investigating the relaxa-
tion processes occurring in solid nitrogen by simultaneous-
ly using the optical and current activation spectroscopy
methods. As mentioned above, after completion of the
sample irradiation the well-known [19] long lived after-
glow (the so-called group) at the wavelength of the
2
D
4
S doubly forbidden transition of N atom (522 nm)
appears, with a characteristic decay time of about 37 s.
We observed also a persistent after-emission of electrons
exhibiting two exponential decays, one with 1 = 37 s, co-
inciding with the afterglow decay time , and the another
with a longer 2 about 215 s.
Before starting the warm-up experiments and recording
the “glow curves”, both the afterglow and the after-emis-
sion were allowed to drop to zero, indicating that all the
excited N atoms produced under irradiation had sufficient
time to return to the ground state. The actual curves show-
ing the temperature dependence of the TSEE and the spec-
trally resolved thermally stimulated luminescence TSL
over the range of the phase existence obtained during the
warm-up of a nitrogen film are presented in Fig. 2, where
for the TSL curve, the group being the most intense line
was monitored. The TSL shows a wide feature with maxi-
mum peaked at 16 K and a “high temperature” shoulder
which extends up to 30 K. The TSEE curve at low temper-
atures consists of two overlapping peaks at 15 and 16 K
with an extended “high temperature” tail. The TSEE yield
exhibits a sharp increase as the phase transition to the
phase is approached. Besides the group, we also moni-
tored the TSL at 793 nm, the wavelength of the so-called
“ line” — an unidentified line. The similarity of the glow
curves detected at 793 and 522 nm shown in Fig. 2 implies
a similar mechanism for a population of the emitting states.
Elucidation of the processes resulting in -line emission
requires further study.
The dynamics of TSL spectra during warm-up of a nitro-
gen–helium sample and a “pure” solid nitrogen film are
shown in Figs. 3 and 4, respectively.
We should note that reappearance of the 522.7 and the
555.5 nm lines in the TSL spectra from a nitrogen solid
film was not reproducible (Fig. 4). In fact, we observed
Fig. 2. The thermostimulated electron emission and the lumines-
cence intensities at 522 and 793 nm of a solid nitrogen film pre-
irradiated with a 1 keV electron beam.
Fig. 3. Dynamics of thermoluminescence spectra of a nitrogen–
helium sample. Every 2nd of the spectra measured is shown.
Fig. 4. Dynamics of thermoluminescence spectra of a solid nitro-
gen film. Every 20th of the spectra measured is shown.
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5 583
some flashes in samples and films containing minor ad-
mixture of oxygen. The similar effect was mentioned in
earlier work, e.g., [20].
The most intense flash spectrum detected during the ni-
trogen–helium sample destruction is shown in Fig. 5. Vari-
ous different states of atomic and molecular nitrogen along
with those of atomic oxygen involved in the energy relaxa-
tion processes. The and groups corresponding to the
transitions N (
2
D
4
S) and O (
1
S
1
D) dominate the spec-
trum. Weak Vegard–Kaplan bands of N2 molecules, the ',
, and '' groups of N atoms, and the line are also shown
in the spectrum.
The typical TSL spectrum detected during a warm-up
of the solid nitrogen film pre-irradiated with an electron
beam is shown in Fig. 6. The spectrum is rather similar to
the one shown in Fig. 5. The spectral features of the TSL
observed from the N2–He sample and the N2 film together
with their identifications are summarized in Table 1.
The positions of the spectral features observed are close
to the ones known for N2 molecules, N and O atoms in N2
matrices. Keeping in mind the spectral resolution of the
spectrometers used in these studies, the agreement of the
results obtained with clusters and solid films with the pub-
lished data on emission from N2 matrices is quite satisfac-
tory.
Table 1. The spectral features of TSL observed from the N2–He
sample and the N2 film, their identification and positions in com-
parison with literature data
T
S
L
o
f
n
it
ro
g
en
–
h
el
iu
m
s
am
p
le
W
av
el
en
g
th
,
n
m
T
S
L
o
f
n
it
ro
g
en
fi
lm
W
av
el
en
g
th
,
n
m
Id
en
ti
fi
ca
ti
o
n
,
p
o
si
ti
o
n
i
n
e
m
is
si
o
n
sp
ec
tr
a
o
f
N
2
m
a-
tr
ix
,
n
m
R
ef
er
en
ce
339.6
365.8
395.3
(very weak and
broad)
bands of Vegard–
Kaplan system:
0–9, 338.6
0–10, 364.4
0–11, 395
[21]
522.6 522.7 α group,
N (
2
D
4
S), 523
[20]
557.4 555.5 β group,
O (
1
S
1
D), 554.2
[20]
594.4 594 α’ group, 594.5 [20]
794.4 792.6 γ line, 793.5
(upon irradiation)
[20]
858.5 855.1 δ’’ group, 856 [20]
1047.7 beyond the oper-
ating range of the
spectrometer
δ group,
N (
2
P
2
D), 1045
[20]
Discussion
Generaly, the TSL spectra obtained during the N2–He
sample warm-up are similar to those detected from the N2
films, while the final destruction temperature of nitrogen–
helium sample is close to the temperature at which the
TSEE and TSL start in nitrogen films. In both systems we
observed strong the and groups, the ' and '' groups
of N atoms, an unidentified line and Vegard–Kaplan
bands of N2 molecules. It means that similar energy trans-
fer and relaxation channels are involved in both systems
studied. Some small quantitative differences observed in
the spectra can be easily understood. For example, the
more intense group observed in the TSL spectrum of the
nitrogen–helium sample (Fig. 5) can be simply explained
by the higher oxygen content in the sample. Close inspec-
tion of the TSL dynamics of nitrogen films shows that the
ratio of the intensities of and ′ groups, I/I′ (about 70),
is somewhat smaller than that in nitrogen–helium samples
(I/I′ = 80) [5]. The intensity of the group emission of
O atoms is comparable with the intensity of group emis-
sions of N atoms because of the much higher (~10
7
times)
Fig. 5. The most intense flash spectrum detected during the nitro-
gen–helium sample destruction.
Fig. 6. The TSL spectrum detected at 16 K during the solid nitro-
gen film warm-up.
R.E. Boltnev et al.
584 Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5
probability of the O (
1
S
1
D) transition as compared with
the N (
2
D
4
S) transition. The main source of oxygen in
nitrogen–helium samples are different impurities such as
O2, OH, H2O in gaseous helium giving totally ~ 10 ppm.
Although the concentration of stabilized N atoms in solid
N2 matrix is three orders of magnitude larger than that of
the O atoms, the significantly larger transition probability
of O atoms leads to a noticeable emission from the O at-
oms. An oxygen impurity also appears in the nitrogen film
studies from residual gases in the deposition chamber es-
pecially at low gas flow rate.
It is notable that the TSEE currents detected for both sys-
tems correlated with the corresponding TSL signals, point-
ing to the important role of the ionic species in the relaxa-
tion cascades. The intense release of negative charge
carriers from the nitrogen–helium sample beginning at
temperatures below 8–10 K indicates that electrons are the
best candidates to be the charge carriers. The observation
of three electron emission peaks (see Fig. 1) may lead to
the destruction of different regions of the impurity–helium
sample because of its inhomogeneous warm-up, which
releases the electrons from these regions. Alternatively, the
observed peaks may be explained by the existence of a
corresponding number of electron traps with different acti-
vation energies. The lowest temperature peak may be relat-
ed to the release of electrons from “bubbles” destroyed
during liquid helium evaporation. As is known, electrons
are self-trapped in liquid helium via the “bubble” structure
formation [22].
In the TSL of nitrogen films a broad main peak at 16 K
with an extended “high temperature” shoulder dominates
the TSL glow curve. This suggests a relatively wide distri-
bution of trap depths and activation energies for stored
charges. An average activation energy deduced by the half-
width method [23] for traps which form the 16 K peak is
about 14 meV. Close correlation of the TSL detected for
the group and TSEE current at temperatures up to 25 K
suggests that this luminescence arises from the neutraliza-
tion reaction of the ionic species N
+
with electrons detrap-
ped upon the warm-up of the nitrogen film: N
+
+ e
–
→ N
*
.
This appears plausible taking into account that the ioniza-
tion potential of the N atom is 14.53 eV is lower than that
for nitrogen molecule (15.58 eV). Despite the firm data on
TSEE from solid nitrogen films [13] there is still an inter-
esting question regarding the presence and specific nature
of positive ions. Molecular ions 2N and 4N had been
detected by ESR spectroscopy [7,8] and IR absorption [9]
in neon matrices. These ions were formed in the neon ma-
trix by electron bombardment and photoionization. Note
that they were detected only when N2/Ne ratio was greater
than 1/600 and a quenching reactant was codeposited with
the nitrogen [8]. Up to now, in our ESR and optical spec-
troscopy studies we did not observe the ion presence in
either nitrogen–helium or nitrogen–neon–helium samples.
However quite recently the presence of 4N in the electron
bombarded solid nitrogen films was revealed using current
and optical activation spectroscopy in the VUV range [10].
The tetranitrogen cation 4N manifested itself by the dis-
sociative recombination reaction with an electron released
from the trap upon warm-up:
1 –
4 2 2 2 2
*N e N N ( ) N Nua h (VUV).
An application of the RF discharge almost excludes the
possibility of trapping predominantly the charges of one
sign in impurity–helium condensates. The origin as well as
the specific nature of ions in impurity–helium condensates
produced by RF discharge is still unclear. There are two
main possibilities for creating ions in IHCs: (1) during a
gas jet condensation, ions formed in an RF discharge re-
gion (possibly, due to deep UV irradition of the clusters
from the helium gas discharge) can be trapped by growing
impurity clusters (moreover, they themselves can be nucle-
ation centers due to the higher polarizability); (2) the ioni-
zation of particles during the sample destruction due to
interaction of excited atoms and molecules following the
recombination of stored radicals. The first possibility ap-
pears more preferred because of our spectroscopic observa-
tion of 2N ions in the condensing gas jet [24]. It is now
well known that sublimation of solid helium shells isolat-
ing the impurity nanoclusters triggers the recombination of
radicals stabilized on surfaces of the clusters and gives rise
to the thermostimulated luminescence [5,25]. The electron
emission from nitrogen–helium condensates at the same
time as the TSL suggests a similar allocation of electrons,
on the surfaces or in outer layers of the nitrogen clusters.
Conclusions
1. Thermostimulated electron emission in nitrogen–
helium condensates during their destruction was observed
for the first time.
2. The same energy relaxation pathways were thermally
initiated in nitrogen nanoclusters and films prepared by
different techniques. The earlier start (at lower tempera-
tures) of the thermoluminescence and the electron emission
from nitrogen nanoclusters is determined by intense re-
combination of nitrogen atoms stabilized on clusters’ sur-
faces following evaporation of solid helium shells sur-
rounding the clusters.
3. Thermostimulated luminescence and electron emis-
sion observed during warm-up of nitrogen–helium conden-
sates and nitrogen films demonstrate the similarity of the
processes initiated, including the neutralization of the ionic
species.
4. The electron emission from nitrogen–helium samples
upon their destruction can be explained either by a capture
of ions in nitrogen nanoclusters during the sample prepa-
ration or by the creation of the ions as a result of interac-
tion of excited atoms and molecules during the sample de-
struction.
Comparative study of thermostimulated luminescence and electron emission of nitrogen nanoclusters and films
Low Temperature Physics/Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2013, v. 39, No. 5 585
The study was supported by grants No. 010366-0137-2009
Norman Hackerman Advanced Research Program, NSF
No. DMR 1209255, RFBR Nos. 11-02-92500-CRDF-E_a
and 11-08-01232-а, CRDF No. RUP1-7025-CG-11, federal
contract 11.519.11.6021 with Russian Federation Ministry
of Education and Science. E.S., I.Kh. and S.U. thank
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft for the travel grant.
1. A.M. Bass and H.P. Broida, Formation and Trapping of
Free Radicals, Academic Press, New York (1960).
2. P.C. Samartzis and A.M. Wodtke, Intern. Rev. Phys. Chem.
25, 527 (2006).
3. Y. Shi and D.W. Brenner, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 134503 (2007).
4. E.B. Gordon, L.P. Mezhov-Deglin, and O.F. Pugachev,
JETP Lett. 19, 103 (1974).
5. V.V. Khmelenko, I.N. Krushinskaya, R.E. Boltnev, I.B. By-
khalo, A.A. Pelmenev, and D.M. Lee, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 38,
871 (2012) [Low Temp. Phys. 38, 688 (2012)].
6. S. Mao, R.E. Boltnev, V.V. Khmelenko, and D.M. Lee, Fiz.
Nizk. Temp. 38, 1313 (2012) [Low Temp. Phys. 38, 1037
(2012)].
7. L.B. Knight, Jr., J.M. Bostick, R.W. Woodward, and J.
Steadman, J. Chem. Phys. 78, 6415 (1983).
8. L.B. Knight, Jr., K.D. Johannessen, D.C. Cobranchi, E.A.
Earl, D. Feller, and E.R. Davidson, J. Chem. Phys. 87, 885
(1987).
9. M.E. Jacox, Research on Chemical Intermediates 12, 33
(1989).
10. E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, G.B. Gu-
menchuk, M.K. Beyer, A.N. Ponomaryov, and V.E. Bondy-
bey, will be submitted to J. Chem. Phys.
11. G. Gumenchuk, A. Ponomaryov, I. Khyzhniy, S. Uyutnov,
E. Savchenko, and V. Bondybey, Phys. Proc. 2, 441 (2009).
12. E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, S.A. Uyutnov, G.B. Gu-
menchuk, A.N. Ponomaryov, and V.E. Bondybey, Fiz. Nizk.
Temp. 35, 520 (2009) [Low Temp. Phys. 35, 409 (2009)].
13. I. Khyzhniy, E. Savchenko, S. Uyutnov, G. Gumenchuk, A.
Ponomaryov, and V. Bondybey, Rad. Meas. 45, 353 (2010).
14. P. Moroshkin, V. Lebedev, and A. Weis, Phys. Rev. Lett.
102, 115301 (2009).
15. A.N. Ponomaryov, E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khyzhniy, G.B.
Gumenchuk, M. Frankowski, and V.E. Bondybey, Fiz. Nizk.
Temp. 33, 705 (2007) [Low Temp. Phys. 33, 532 (2007)].
16. A. Ponomaryov, G. Gumenchuk, E. Savchenko, and V.E.
Bondybey, Phys. Chem. Phys. 9, 1329 (2007).
17. E.V. Savchenko, I.V. Khizhniy, G.B. Gumenchuk, A.N. Po-
nomaryov, and V.E. Bondybey, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 32, 1417
(2006) [Low Temp. Phys. 32, 1078 (2006)].
18. E.V. Savchenko, A.G. Belov, G.B. Gumenchuk, A.N. Pono-
maryov, M.K. Beyer, V.E. Bondybey, and M. Frankowski,
Rad. Phys. & Chem. 76, 577 (2007).
19. A. Lofthus and P.H. Krupenie, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 6,
113 (1977).
20. M. Peyron, E.M. Hörl, H.W. Brown, and H.P. Broida, J.
Chem. Phys. 30, 1304 (1959).
21. Yu.B. Poltoratski and I.Ya. Fugol, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 5, 925
(1979) [Sov. J. Low Temp. Phys. 5, 439 (1979)].
22. J. Jortner, N.R. Kestner, S.A. Rice, and M.H. Cohen, J.
Chem. Phys. 43, 2614 (1965).
23. D.R. Vij, Thermoluminescence, in: Luminescence of Solids,
D.R. Vij (ed.), Plenum Press, New York (1998), p. 271.
24. E.B. Gordon, M.V. Martynenko, A.A. Pelmenev, O.F. Puga-
chev, and V.V. Khmelenko, Khim. Fiz. 13, 15 (1994).
25. V.V. Khmelenko, A.A. Pelmenev, I.N. Krushinskaya, I.B. By-
khalo, R.E. Boltnev, and D.M. Lee, Accepted for publication
in J. Low Temp. Phys., DOI: 10.1007/s10909-012-0707-3.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10909-012-0707-3
|