Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol
Experimental data on the thermal conductivity κ(T) of some simple alcohols have been compared, analyzed and generalized. The objects of investigation were methyl, protonated and deuterated ethyl, 1-propyl and 1-butyl alcohols in the thermodynamically equilibrium phase with a complete orientational o...
Gespeichert in:
Datum: | 2011 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
2011
|
Schriftenreihe: | Физика низких температур |
Schlagworte: | |
Online Zugang: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118547 |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Zitieren: | Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol / O.A. Korolyuk // Физика низких температур. — 2011. — Т. 37, № 5. — С. 526–530. — Бібліогр.: 29 назв. — англ. |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraineid |
irk-123456789-118547 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
irk-123456789-1185472017-05-31T03:03:50Z Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol Korolyuk, O.A. 8th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals Experimental data on the thermal conductivity κ(T) of some simple alcohols have been compared, analyzed and generalized. The objects of investigation were methyl, protonated and deuterated ethyl, 1-propyl and 1-butyl alcohols in the thermodynamically equilibrium phase with a complete orientational order. The temperature interval was from 2 K to the melting point under the equilibrium vapor pressure. It is found that in the region above the temperature of the maximum thermal conductivity κ(T) deviates from the 1/Т law. This is because the total thermal conductivity has an extra contribution κII(T) of short-lived phonons in addition to κI(T) contributed by propagating phonons: κ(T) = κI(T) + κII(T). The contribution κI(T) is well described by the Debye–Peierls model allowing for the phonon–phonon processes and scattering of phonons by dislocations. At Т > 40 K the contribution κI(T) obeys the law A/Т and κII(T) is practically temperature-independent. It is shown that the Debye temperature ΘD of alcohol is dependent on the molecular mass as ΘD = 678М⁻⁰.⁴² K and the coefficient А characterizing the intensity of the phonon–phonon scattering increases with the molecular mass of the simple monoatomic alcohol by the law А = 0.85М⁰.⁸ W/m, which suggests a decreasing intensity of the phonon–phonon process. 2011 Article Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol / O.A. Korolyuk // Физика низких температур. — 2011. — Т. 37, № 5. — С. 526–530. — Бібліогр.: 29 назв. — англ. 0132-6414 PACS: 66.70.–f, 63.20.–e http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118547 en Физика низких температур Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України |
institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
collection |
DSpace DC |
language |
English |
topic |
8th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals 8th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals |
spellingShingle |
8th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals 8th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals Korolyuk, O.A. Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol Физика низких температур |
description |
Experimental data on the thermal conductivity κ(T) of some simple alcohols have been compared, analyzed and generalized. The objects of investigation were methyl, protonated and deuterated ethyl, 1-propyl and 1-butyl alcohols in the thermodynamically equilibrium phase with a complete orientational order. The temperature interval was from 2 K to the melting point under the equilibrium vapor pressure. It is found that in the region above the temperature of the maximum thermal conductivity κ(T) deviates from the 1/Т law. This is because the total thermal conductivity has an extra contribution κII(T) of short-lived phonons in addition to κI(T) contributed by propagating phonons: κ(T) = κI(T) + κII(T). The contribution κI(T) is well described by the Debye–Peierls model allowing for the phonon–phonon processes and scattering of phonons by dislocations. At Т > 40 K the contribution κI(T) obeys the law A/Т and κII(T) is practically temperature-independent. It is shown that the Debye temperature ΘD of alcohol is dependent on the molecular mass as ΘD = 678М⁻⁰.⁴² K and the coefficient А characterizing the intensity of the phonon–phonon scattering increases with the molecular mass of the simple monoatomic alcohol by the law А = 0.85М⁰.⁸ W/m, which suggests a decreasing intensity of the phonon–phonon process. |
format |
Article |
author |
Korolyuk, O.A. |
author_facet |
Korolyuk, O.A. |
author_sort |
Korolyuk, O.A. |
title |
Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol |
title_short |
Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol |
title_full |
Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol |
title_fullStr |
Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol |
title_full_unstemmed |
Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol |
title_sort |
thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol |
publisher |
Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України |
publishDate |
2011 |
topic_facet |
8th International Conference on Cryocrystals and Quantum Crystals |
url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/118547 |
citation_txt |
Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol / O.A. Korolyuk // Физика низких температур. — 2011. — Т. 37, № 5. — С. 526–530. — Бібліогр.: 29 назв. — англ. |
series |
Физика низких температур |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT korolyukoa thermalconductivityofmolecularcrystalsofmonoatomicalcoholsfrommethanoltobutanol |
first_indexed |
2025-07-08T14:13:14Z |
last_indexed |
2025-07-08T14:13:14Z |
_version_ |
1837088371736838144 |
fulltext |
© O.A. Korolyuk, 2011
Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2011, v. 37, No. 5, p. 526–530
Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic
alcohols: from methanol to butanol
O.A. Korolyuk
B. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
47 Lenin Ave., Kharkov 61103, Ukraine
E-mail: korolyuk@ilt.kharkov.ua
Received December 10, 2010
Experimental data on the thermal conductivity κ(T) of some simple alcohols have been compared, analyzed
and generalized. The objects of investigation were methyl, protonated and deuterated ethyl, 1-propyl and 1-butyl
alcohols in the thermodynamically equilibrium phase with a complete orientational order. The temperature inter-
val was from 2 K to the melting point under the equilibrium vapor pressure. It is found that in the region above the
temperature of the maximum thermal conductivity κ(T) deviates from the 1/Т law. This is because the total ther-
mal conductivity has an extra contribution κII(T) of short-lived phonons in addition to κI(T) contributed by propa-
gating phonons: κ(T) = κI(T) + κII(T). The contribution κI(T) is well described by the Debye–Peierls model allow-
ing for the phonon–phonon processes and scattering of phonons by dislocations. At Т > 40 K the contribution
κI(T) obeys the law A/Т and κII(T) is practically temperature-independent. It is shown that the Debye temperature
ΘD of alcohol is dependent on the molecular mass as ΘD = 678М –0.42 K and the coefficient А characterizing the
intensity of the phonon–phonon scattering increases with the molecular mass of the simple monoatomic alcohol by
the law А = 0.85М 0.8 W/m, which suggests a decreasing intensity of the phonon–phonon process.
PACS: 66.70.–f Nonelectronic thermal conduction and heat-pulse propagation in solids; thermal waves;
63.20.–e Phonons in crystal lattices.
Keywords: thermal conductivity, crystals, simple monoatomic alcohols, phonon–phonon scattering, orientational
ordering.
Introduction
The temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity
of simple dielectrically-perfect crystals with orientational
degrees of freedom usually has the shape of bell. The ther-
mal conductivity in the low-temperature region of the curve
is determined by the grain-boundary scattering of phonons
and obeys the law Т3 [1]. As the temperature rises, a maxi-
mum of thermal conductivity appears in the curve, its height
being dependent on the crystal quality. On further heating,
the thermal conductivity decreases exponentially and finally
changes to the law 1/Т (e.g., see [2–7]). This law is deter-
mined by the processes of phonon–phonon scattering.
In addition to acoustic phonon modes, molecular crys-
tals with several molecules per unit cell also have localized
short-wavelength vibrational modes which can cross the
acoustic branches. This influences the temperature beha-
vior of the thermal conductivity in the region above the
temperature of the phonon maximum. It has been shown
recently that localized short-wavelength vibrational modes
are considerably important for the thermal conductivity of
simple molecular orientationally-ordered hydrogen-bonded
crystals under the equilibrium pressure [8]. The thermal
conductivity investigated [8] in three simple monoatomic
alcohols in the orientationally-ordered phase exhibited a
deviation from the law A/Т in the high-temperature region
(А is a coefficient characterizing the intensity of phonon–
phonon scattering, which is dependent on the number of C
atoms in the alcohol molecule). The law A/T cannot de-
scribe the behavior of the isochoric thermal conductivity of
cryocrystals [9].
Primary monoatomic alcohols are organic compounds
consisting of a carbon skeleton with a hydroxyl group OH
at its end. The alcohol molecule is “flexible” as to the bond
length between the carbon skeleton and the hydroxyl group
and the angle between the carbon skeleton and the OH
group. Such flexibility is an additional source of low-
energy intramolecular local vibrations in the alcohol crys-
tal [10]. Simple monoatomic alcohols are very interesting
objects to investigate, especially ethyl alcohol which exhi-
bits rich polymorphism in the condensed phase [10–12].
Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol
Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2011, v. 37, No. 5 527
Fig. 1. The temperature dependences of the thermal conductivity
of methyl [15], deuterated ethyl [19], and 1-butyl [16] alcohols in
the orientationally-ordered phase. The dependence А/Т + С for
the crystal 1-butanol at T > 40 K (black thick line) along with the
dependence А/Т (red line) for coefficients А = 28.0 W/m and
С = 0.32 W/(m⋅K) are illustrated in this picture.
1 10 100
0,1
1
Deuterated ethanol
1-butanol
methanol
T, K
T
2
A T C/ +
A T/
�
�
,
W
/(
m
K
)
On cooling primary alcohols are readily supercooled and
form glasses. The thermal conductivity in such glasses
demonstrate rather unusual behavior. For example, at low
temperatures it is dependent on the number of C atoms in
the alcohol molecule [13]. On crystallization into the orien-
tationally-ordered phase, the molecules of a monoatomic
alcohol form a chain-like structure due to the H bonds.
This study presents a detailed analysis of the thermal
conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic orien-
tationally-ordered alcohols in the series from methanol to
1-butanol including deuterated ethanol. The general regu-
larities of the temperature dependence of the thermal con-
ductivity have been revealed for molecular crystals of
orientationally-ordered alcohols. It is shown that the coef-
ficient А characterizing the intensity of phonon–phonon
scattering increases almost linearly with the molecular
mass of the simple monoatomic alcohol.
Experiment and discussion
The thermal conductivity of crystalline alcohols was
measured under the equilibrium vapor pressure in the setup
developed by [14] using the flat steady — state potenti-
ometric method at temperatures from 2 K to the melting
point Tm. The sample preparation is detailed elsewhere
[8,15,16]. The deuterated C2D5OD alcohol (D purity was
99%, anhydrous) was supplied by Cambridge Isotope La-
boratories, Inc. The concentration of hydrogen isotopic
defects was 1%. The crystals of protonated and deuterated
ethyl, 1-propyl and 1-butyl alcohols in completely orienta-
tionally-ordered thermodynamically-equilibrium phase
were obtained from the glass state by gradual heating
through several successive metastable states. Each sample
was long-annealed near Tm. The thermal conductivity was
investigated for two methanol samples [15], one high qual-
ity sample of hydrogenated ethanol [8] and some middle
quality samples of hydrogenated ethanol [17], one sample
of 1-propanol [18], one sample of 1-butanol [16], and four
samples of deuterated ethanol [19].
The measured temperature dependences of the orienta-
tionally-ordered crystals of methanol [15], deuterated etha-
nol [19] and 1-butanol [16] are illustrated in the double
logarithmic coordinates in Fig. 1. The curves have the bell-
like shape typical of orientationally-ordered crystals. They
have a distinct phonon-induced maximum of κ(T) at
T = 14.2 K in deuterated ethanol, T = 17.1 K in methanol
and T = 28 K in 1-butanol. Deuterated ethanol and 1-bu-
tanol have close maximal thermal conductivities. The max-
imal thermal conductivity of methanol is somewhat lower,
which indicates a worse quality of the crystal. Below ph
maxT
the thermal conductivity of the alcohols is close to the qu-
adratic temperature dependence which corresponds to the
processes of phonon scattering at dislocations. Above
ph
maxT the thermal conductivity of the alcohols decreases
with the temperature rise. This corresponds to the effective
processes of phonon–phonon scattering [8,15]. In 1-butyl
alcohol the thermal conductivity is the lowest at low tem-
peratures and the highest at high temperatures. Above
T = 40 К the thermal conductivity deviates obviously from
the expected dependence 1/Т. It is seen that in this temper-
ature region the heat transport is effected not only through
the phonon–phonon mechanism of heat dissipation follow-
ing the dependence 1/Т but is contributed by an additional
mechanism independent of temperature. On this basis the
temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity
κ(T) can be presented as a sum [8]
κ(T) = А/Т + С. (1)
The first term А/Т characterizes the resistive processes of
phonon–phonon scattering. The term С refers to the addi-
tional mechanism of heat transport by localized short-wa-
velength vibrational modes, or phonons whose mean free
path is comparable with the phonon half-wavelength. The
dependence А/Т + С for the crystal 1-butanol at T > 40 K
(black thick line) along with the dependence А/Т (red line)
for coefficients А = 28.0 W/m and С = 0.32 W/(m⋅K) are
illustrated in Fig. 1.
Table 1 carries the coefficients А and С of Eq. (1) for
some simple alcohols along with their molar masses, spatial
symmetry groups, melting temperatures Tm, Debye tempera-
tures ΘD and the coefficients CD at Т3 derived from heat
capacity data. ΘD of some crystals of simple monoatomic
alcohols were calculated using the coefficient CD at Т3 ob-
tained by the Spanish researchers investigating the heat ca-
pacity of alcohols [12,20]. Coefficients A for 1-butanol and
methanol were obtained with accuracy 3–4% and for deu-
terated ethanol accuracy of coefficient A is 9%.
O.A. Korolyuk
528 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2011, v. 37, No. 5
Fig. 2. The Debye temperature ΘD of simple monoatomic alco-
hols as a function of the mass of the alcohol molecule. The line
illustrates the dependence ΘD = 678М –0.42 K.
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
M, g/mol
�
D
,
K
Table 1. The molar mass M, melting temperature Tm, Debye temperature ΘD, coefficient CD at Т3 obtained from heat capacity data
for alcohols [12,20], spatial symmetry groups of orientationally-ordered crystals and the coefficients А and С for 1-butanol (this study),
deuterated ethanol [19], methanol, protonated ethanol and 1-propanol [8]
* — extrapolation
As the mass of the alcohol molecule increases, the coef-
ficient С has nonmonotonic dependence, the coefficient А
increases, which points to a reduction of the phonon–
phonon scattering intensity.
The second temperature-independent contribution in
Eq. (1) can be described by the phenomenological Cahill–
Pohl model [26], which assumes that in the approximation
of the Debye phonon spectrum of the isotropic medium
(the difference in the polarizations of the phonon modes is
disregarded) the shortest lifetime of each vibration is equal
to its half-period τ = π/ω [26].
Traditionally, the temperature dependence of thermal
conductivity is described quite accurately by the Debye–
Peierls model of an isotropic solid. Using this model the
expression κ(T) = κI(T) + κII(T) can be obtained conceiv-
ing the effective κ(T) as a sum of the contribution κI(T) of
the phonons inducing resistive scattering and κII(T) of the
phonons whose mean free path is equal to the phonon half-
wavelength (the so-called localized short-wavelength vi-
brational modes in the Cahill–Pohl model).
The thermal conductivity of the methanol–1-butanol se-
ries of alcohols in the orientationally-ordered phase was
thus separated into two constituents κI(T) and κII(T). The
component κII was calculated within the Cahill–Pohl mod-
el by Eq. (3) of Ref. 8 for the whole temperature interval.
The contribution κII is rather insignificant at low tempera-
tures but it increases with a rising temperatures and be-
comes determining at high temperatures. It accounts for the
high-energy excitations that are thermally activated above
40 K. κII(T) of deuterated ethanol and 1-butanol was calcu-
lated using the ΘD data of Table 1 and sound velocities v
obtained from the ΘD data allowing for the density ρ:
ρ = 1213 kg/m3 [25], v = 1795 m/s in deuterated ethanol
and ρ = 1318.5 kg/m3 [23], v = 1704 m/s in 1-butanol.
The dependence of the Debye temperature ΘD of some
monoatomic alcohols on the molecular mass is shown in
Fig. 2 in the double logarithmic coordinates. Unfortunate-
ly, there are no direct data on the Debye temperature of
methanol. ΘD = 106 K was estimated [15] from the longi-
tudinal sound velocity [27]. Nevertheless, the ΘD values
obtained for other alcohols fall quite accurately on the de-
pendence ΘD = 678М –0.42 K, which makes it possible to
extrapolate ΘD = 158 K for methanol. The dependence of
ΘD on the mass of the molecule agrees with the depen-
dence ΘD ~ M –1/2 in [10]. The decrease in ΘD with the
increasing molecular mass indicates that the frequency
interval of the acoustic modes reduces. In the investigated
series of alcohols the region of acoustic frequencies was
the largest in the methanol crystal and the smallest in 1-bu-
tanol. This refers to the effective spectrum of vibrational
states in the Debye model. As the number of C atoms in
the alcohol molecule increases, the crossing of the local
and acoustic modes occurring in alcohols with a small
number of C atoms in the molecule [10] shifts gradually
beyond the acoustic frequency region because the acoustic
region reduces. This is one of the factors suppressing the
intensity of phonon–phonon scattering when the mass of
the alcohol molecule increases.
The phonon contribution κI was obtained as a differ-
ence between the measured total thermal conductivity κ(T)
and the component κII. At high temperatures κI(T) obeys
the law 1/Т. The component κI was then compared with the
value calculated within the Debye–Peierls relaxation mod-
el using Eq. (2) of Ref. 8 allowing for the resistive U-pro-
Alcohol M, g/mol А, W/m С, W/(m⋅K) Space groups Tm, K CD, mJ/(mol⋅K4) ΘD, K
Methanol 32.04 14.2 0.24±0.01
P212121
orthorhombic [21]
175.37 [21]
158 *
106 [15]
Ethanol-Н 46.07 16.9 0.16±0.01 Pc monoclinic [24] 159 [11] 0.766 [12] 136
Ethanol-D 52.11 20.1 0.18±0.01 Pc monoclinic [25] 159 [12] 0.906 [12] 129
1-Propanol 60.09 21.6 0.10±0.01 P21/m monoclinic [22] 148 [12] 1.10 [12] 121
1-Butanol 74.12 28.0 0.32±0.01 triclinic [23] 183.5 [23] 1.40 [20] 112 [20]
Thermal conductivity of molecular crystals of monoatomic alcohols: from methanol to butanol
Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2011, v. 37, No. 5 529
Fig. 3. The coefficient А as a function of the molar mass of sim-
ple alcohols: experiment (○), literature data for N2 (Ú) [4].
Theory of phonon–phonon scattering: molecular crystals [7] (see
Eq. (2)) (Δ); atomic crystals [29] (see Eq. (3)) (■); solid line —
dependence А = 0.85М 0.8 W/m.
30 40 50 60 70 80 90
N2
CH OH3
C H OH2 5
C D OH2 5
C H OH3 7
A M= 0.85 W/m
0.8
C H OH4 9
10
100
M, g/mol
A
,
W
/m
cesses of phonon scattering and also allowing for scatter-
ing by dislocations. The relaxation rate of phonons causing
resistive scattering 1
I
−τ is assumed to obey the Matthiesen
rule and, therefore, can be written as a sum of rates
representing different processes 1:i
−τ
1 1
I ( , ) ( , ).i
i
T T− −τ ω = τ ω∑
For an ordered crystal, the dominant mechanisms able to
scatter heat-carrying phonons will concern anharmonic
Umklapp processes with a rate 1,U
−τ and scattering by dis-
locations 1
dis.−τ Relevant expressions for all the scattering
processes are given by
1 2 1
dis dis( , ) exp( / ), ( , ) ,U UT B T E T T D− −τ ω = ω − τ ω = ω
where B is the frequency factor, EU is the activation energy
for the U-processes, and Ddis is the dislocation scattering
strength. It is found that the Debye–Peierls model de-
scribes the phonon component κI(T) of the investigated
alcohols quite accurately.
At high temperatures the intensity of the phonon–pho-
non processes in crystals is characterized by the coefficient
А of Eq. (1) which can be estimated proceeding from the
theory of phonon–phonon scattering. Knowing the melting
temperature the coefficient А of molecular crystals can be
calculated by Slack’s [28] formula as [7]
1/32
22 ,
6
B D m AT N
A
M
κ Θ ρ⎛ ⎞
= ⎜ ⎟
π⎝ ⎠
(2)
where NA is the Avogadro constant. The coefficient А for
cubic atomic crystals with n > 2 atoms per unit cell can be
calculated by Slack’s equation [29]:
1/37 3
2 2/3
3 10
,D
A
M MA
Nn
⎛ ⎞⋅ Θ
= ⎜ ⎟ργ ⎝ ⎠
(3)
where γ is the Grüneisen constant equal to γ = 2.5 for the
investigated crystals with n = 4 for methanol, ethanol and
1-butanol [21–23], and n = 6 for 1-propanol [24]. The de-
pendence of the coefficient А upon the mass of a simple
monoatomic alcohol molecule is illustrated in Fig. 3 in the
double logarithmic coordinates (experimental results and
calculation by Eqs. (2), (3)). It is seen that the coefficient
А increases almost linearly with the molar mass of simple
alcohols and falls quite well on the dependence А =
= 0.85М 0.8 W/m. The theory of phonon–phonon processes
does not describe the behavior of the coefficient А particu-
larly in the case of low molar masses. The discrepancy
between theory and experiment reduces as the molar mass
increases. Equation (2) describes the experimental results
more accurately than Eq. (3). The growth of the coefficient
with the mass of the alcohol molecule implies that at high
temperatures the thermal conductivity increases with the
mass of the alcohol molecule. Hence, the intensity of pho-
non–phonon scattering decreases. For comparison, Fig. 3
carries the coefficient A obtained from the thermal conduc-
tivity data for nitrogen [4] in the orientationally-ordered
phase. This value cannot be described by the above А-vs-
mass dependence.
Conclusions
The data on the thermal conductivity of a series of sim-
ple monoatomic alcohols from methanol to 1-butanol in
the crystalline phase with a complete orientational order
under equilibrium pressure have been analyzed. It is found
that above the temperature of the maximum thermal con-
ductivity κ(T) deviates from the expected law 1/Т, which
follows from anharmonic interactions of acoustic excita-
tions. The deviation is due to the contribution κII(T) of
short-lived phonons, which appear in the total thermal
conductivity in addition to the contribution κI(T) of propa-
gating phonons: κ(T) = κI(T) + κII(T). The additional κII(T)
is due to localized short-wavelength vibrational modes in
the Cahill–Pohl model. It is shown that the Debye tempera-
ture ΘD is dependent on the mass of the alcohol molecule
as ΘD = 678М –0.42 K and the coefficient А characterizing
the intensity of phonon–phonon scattering increases with
the molar mass of the simple monoatomic alcohol follow-
ing the law А = 0.85М 0.8 W/m, which corresponds to a
decrease in the intensity of the phonon–phonon scattering.
This behavior is due to the fact that in alcohol crystals with
an orientational order acoustic phonons modes are hybri-
dized with localized short-wavelength vibrational modes.
The author is grateful to A.I. Krivchikov and I.V. Sha-
rapova for the helpful and fruitful discussion and assis-
tance in the preparation of the paper.
O.A. Korolyuk
530 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2011, v. 37, No. 5
1. O.A. Korolyuk, A.I. Krivchikov, and B.Ya. Gorodilov, J.
Low Temp. Phys. 122, 203 (2001).
2. R. Berman, Thermal Conduction in Solids, Clarendon press,
Oxford (1976).
3. L.A. Koloskova, I.N. Krupskii, V.G. Manzhelii, and B.Ya.
Gorodilov, Fiz. Tverd. Tela 15, 1913 (1973) [Sov. Phys.
Solid State 15, 1278 (1973)].
4. P. Stachowiak, V.V. Sumarokov, J. Mucha, and A. Jeżowski,
Phys. Rev. B50, 543 (1994).
5. V.G. Manzhelii, V.B. Kokshenev, L.A. Koloskova, and I.N.
Krupskii, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 1, 1302 (1975) [Sov. J. Low
Temp. Phys. 1, 624 (1975)].
6. R.G. Ross, P. Andersson, B. Sundqvist, and G. Backstrom,
Rep. Prog. Phys. 47, 1347 (1984).
7. A. F. Chudnovskii, B. M. Mogilevskii, and V. G. Surin, J.
Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 19, 1295 (1970).
8. A.I. Krivchikov, F.J. Bermejo, I.V. Sharapova, O.A.
Korolyuk, and O.O. Romantsova, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 35, 1143
(2009) [Low Temp. Phys. 35, 891 (2009)].
9. V.A. Konstantinov, V.G. Manzhelii, M.A. Strzhemechny,
and S.A. Smirnov, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 14, 90 (1988) [Low
Temp. Phys. 14, 48 (1988)].
10. C. Talón, M.A. Ramos, S. Vieira, G.J. Cuello, F.J. Bermejo,
A. Criado, M.L. Senent, S.M. Bennington, H.E. Fischer, and
H. Schober, Phys. Rev. B58, 745 (1998).
11. O. Haida, H. Suga, and S. Seki, J. Chem. Thermodyn. 9,
1133 (1977).
12. M.A. Ramos, C. Talón, R.J. Jiménez-Riobóo, and S. Vieira,
J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, S1007 (2003).
13. A.I. Krivchikov, O.A. Korolyuk, I.V. Sharapova, О.О.
Romantsova, F.J. Bermejo, C. Cabrillo, R. Fernandez-Perea,
and I. Bustinduy, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 357, 483 (2011).
14. A.I. Krivchikov V.G. Manzhelii, O.A. Korolyuk, B.Ya.
Gorodilov, and O.O. Romantsova, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
7, 728 (2005).
15. O.A. Korolyuk, A.I. Krivchikov, I.V. Sharapova, and O.O.
Romantsova, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 35, 380 (2009) [Low Temp.
Phys. 35, 290 (2009)].
16. M. Hassaine, R.J. Jiménez-Riobóo, I.V. Sharapova, O.A.
Korolyuk, A.I. Krivchikov, and M.A. Ramos, J. Chem. Phys.
131, 174508 (2009).
17. F.J. Bermejo, R. Fernandez-Perea, and A.I. Krivchikov,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 229601 (2007).
18. A.I. Krivchikov, A.N. Yushchenko, O.A. Korolyuk, F.J.
Bermejo, R. Fernandez-Perea, I. Bustinduy, and M.A.
Gonzalez, Phys. Rev. B77, 024202 (2008).
19. A.I. Krivchikov, F.J. Bermejo, I.V. Sharapova, O.A.
Korolyuk, and О.О. Romantsova, Fiz. Nizk. Temp. 37, No. 6
(2011) [Low Temp. Phys. 37, No. 6 (2011)].
20. A.I. Krivchikov, M. Hassaine, I.V. Sharapova, O.A. Korolyuk,
R.J. Jiménez-Riobóo, and M.A. Ramos, J. Non-Cryst. Solids
357, 524 (2011).
21. B.H. Torrie, O.S. Binbrek, M. Strauss, and I.P. Swainson, J.
Solid State Chem. 166, 415 (2002).
22. C.C. Talón, F.J. Bermejo, C. Cabrillo, G.J. Cuello, M.A.
Gonzalez, J.W. Richardson, Jr., A. Criado, M.A. Ramos, S.
Vieira, F.L. Cumbrera, and L.M. Gonzalez, Phys. Rev. Lett.
88, 115506 (2002).
23. I.M. Shmyt’ko, R.J. Jiménez-Riobóo, M. Hassaine, and
M.A. Ramos, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 195102 (2010).
24. P.G. Jönsson, Acta Cryst. B32, 232 (1976).
25. F.J. Bermejo, A. Criado, R. Fayos, R. Fernandez-Perea, H.E.
Fischer, E. Suard, A. Guelylah, and J. Zuniga, Phys. Rev.
B56, 11536 (1997).
26. D.G. Cahill and R.O. Pohl, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 39, 93
(1988); D.G. Cahill and R.O. Pohl, Phys. Rev. B35, 4067
(1987); D.G. Cahill, S.K. Watson, and R.O. Pohl, Phys. Rev.
B46, 6131 (1992).
27. A. Srinivasan, F.J. Bermejo, and A.De. Bernabe, Molecular
Physics 87, 1439 (1996).
28. P. Slack, Phys. Rev. A139, 507 (1965).
29. G.A. Slack, Solid State Phys. 34, 1 (1979).
|