There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains
We review some recent results on statistical mechanics of the one-dimensional spin-1/2 XY systems paying special attention to the dynamic and thermodynamic properties of the models with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, correlated disorder, and regularly alternating Hamiltonian parameters.
Збережено в:
Дата: | 2002 |
---|---|
Автор: | |
Формат: | Стаття |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Інститут фізики конденсованих систем НАН України
2002
|
Назва видання: | Condensed Matter Physics |
Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/120686 |
Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Цитувати: | There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains / O. Derzhko // Condensed Matter Physics. — 2002. — Т. 5, № 4(32). — С. 729-749. — Бібліогр.: 51 назв. — англ. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraineid |
irk-123456789-120686 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
irk-123456789-1206862017-06-13T03:03:17Z There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains Derzhko, O. We review some recent results on statistical mechanics of the one-dimensional spin-1/2 XY systems paying special attention to the dynamic and thermodynamic properties of the models with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, correlated disorder, and regularly alternating Hamiltonian parameters. Зроблено огляд деяких недавніх результатів з статистичної механіки одновимірних спін-1/2 XY систем. Особлива увага звернута на динамічні і термодинамічні властивості моделей з взаємодією Дзялошинського-Морія, скорельованим безладом і регулярно змінними параметрами гамільтоніана. 2002 Article There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains / O. Derzhko // Condensed Matter Physics. — 2002. — Т. 5, № 4(32). — С. 729-749. — Бібліогр.: 51 назв. — англ. 1607-324X PACS: 75.10.-b DOI:10.5488/CMP.5.4.729 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/120686 en Condensed Matter Physics Інститут фізики конденсованих систем НАН України |
institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
collection |
DSpace DC |
language |
English |
description |
We review some recent results on statistical mechanics of the one-dimensional
spin-1/2 XY systems paying special attention to the dynamic and thermodynamic
properties of the models with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction,
correlated disorder, and regularly alternating Hamiltonian parameters. |
format |
Article |
author |
Derzhko, O. |
spellingShingle |
Derzhko, O. There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains Condensed Matter Physics |
author_facet |
Derzhko, O. |
author_sort |
Derzhko, O. |
title |
There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains |
title_short |
There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains |
title_full |
There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains |
title_fullStr |
There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains |
title_full_unstemmed |
There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains |
title_sort |
there is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 xy chains |
publisher |
Інститут фізики конденсованих систем НАН України |
publishDate |
2002 |
url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/120686 |
citation_txt |
There is life in the old horse yet or what else we can learn studying spin-1/2 XY chains / O. Derzhko // Condensed Matter Physics. — 2002. — Т. 5, № 4(32). — С. 729-749. — Бібліогр.: 51 назв. — англ. |
series |
Condensed Matter Physics |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT derzhkoo thereislifeintheoldhorseyetorwhatelsewecanlearnstudyingspin12xychains |
first_indexed |
2025-07-08T18:24:13Z |
last_indexed |
2025-07-08T18:24:13Z |
_version_ |
1837104167332610048 |
fulltext |
Condensed Matter Physics, 2002, Vol. 5, No. 4(32), pp. 729–749
There is life in the old horse yet or what
else we can learn studying spin-1
2
XY
chains
O.Derzhko 1,2
1 Institute for Condensed Matter Physics
of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
1 Svientsitskii Str., 79011 Lviv, Ukraine
2 Chair of Theoretical Physics,
Ivan Franko National University of Lviv,
12 Drahomanov Street, 79005 Lviv, Ukraine
Received September 2, 2002
We review some recent results on statistical mechanics of the one-dimens-
ional spin- 1
2
XY systems paying special attention to the dynamic and ther-
modynamic properties of the models with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interac-
tion, correlated disorder, and regularly alternating Hamiltonian parameters.
Key words: spin- 1
2
XY chains, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction,
correlated disorder, magnetization plateaus, spin-Peierls instability
PACS: 75.10.-b
1. Introductory remarks
One-dimensional spin- 1
2
XY model in a transverse field defined by the Hamilto-
nian
H =
∑
n
Ωszn +
∑
n
(
Jxsxns
x
n+1 + Jysyns
y
n+1
)
(1)
is known as the simplest quantum many-body system for which many statistical me-
chanical calculations can be performed exactly, i.e., without making any simplifying
approximations. For more than forty years this model has been a standard testing-
ground for checking various conjectures or new calculation schemes and approaches
in statistical mechanics and condensed matter physics. The aim of the present paper
is to elucidate some recent results derived for spin- 1
2
XY chains and to foresee some
further problems which are attractive to study. The interest in spin- 1
2
XY chains
may be enforced nowadays because of the progress in material sciences (see, for ex-
c© O.Derzhko 729
O.Derzhko
ample, the recent report on Cs2CoCl4, the compound which is a good realization of
the famous spin-1
2
isotropic XY chain [1]).
2. Dynamic properties in fermionic picture
Spin-1
2
XY chains contain a hidden symmetry which was discovered by applying
the Jordan-Wigner transformation: the system of interacting spins (1) can be de-
scribed in terms of noninteracting spinless fermions (E.Lieb, T.Schultz, D.Mattis).
As a result many (although by no means all) statistical mechanical calculations
can be performed rigorously. As an example of notorious problems in the statis-
tical mechanics of spin- 1
2
XY chains we may mention the analysis of the time-
dependent correlation functions of x (y) spin components 〈sxn(t)sxn+m〉, sxn(t) =
exp(iHt)sxn exp(−iHt), 〈(. . .)〉 = Tr(exp(−βH)(. . .))/Tr(exp(−βH)). Since the rela-
tion between the x spin component attached to a certain site and the on-site creation
and annihilation operators of fermions is nonlocal and involves the occupation-
number operators of fermions at all previous sites, the problem of applying the
Wick-Bloch-de Dominicis theorem to a product of a huge number of multipliers
arises. The result can be written compactly as the Pfaffian of an antisymmetric
matrix (generally speaking of huge sizes) constructed from the elementary contrac-
tions and hence a further analytical analysis becomes not simple. The problem has
been solved to some extent by elaborating the numerical schemes for computation
of Pfaffians [2–6]. The numerically derived1 results for xx (yy, xy, yx) dynamics
supplemented by the analytical results for zz dynamics [8] permit to work out the
theory of dynamic properties of spin- 1
2
XY chains in the fermionic picture (G.Müller
with coworkers) and thus to explain the peculiarities of responses of the spin system
to small external perturbations [8,9].
Let us sketch briefly the linear response theory of the spin chain in the fermionic
language considering for simplicity the isotropic XY model (Jx = Jy = J). The zz
dynamic structure factor for this model which is given by
Szz(κ, ω) =
∫ π
−π
dκ1nκ1
(1 − nκ1−κ) δ (ω + Λκ1
− Λκ1−κ) , (2)
Λκ = Ω + J cos κ, nκ =
1
1 + exp(βΛκ)
suggests the following interpretation [8,10]. Consider at first the high-temperature
limit β → 0 when nκ → 1
2
and hence Szz(κ, ω) (2) becomes independent of Ω. Ap-
plying the infinitesimally small external field (directed along z axis) characterized
by the wave vector κ and frequency ω we observe that the responsive magnetiza-
tion (directed along z axis) is determined by generation of the two fermions with
energies Λκ1
and Λκ2
under the restrictions κ = κ1 − κ2 and ω = −Λκ1
+ Λκ2
=
1The numerical approach is not restricted to the uniform chains and can be easily applied to
the nonuniform chains in which the Hamiltonian parameters vary regularly along the chain with a
finite period or are random variables with a given probability distribution [7].
730
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
Szz(κ,ω)
κ
ω
a
1 2
1
2
0
1
2
Szz(κ,ω)
κ
ω
b
1 2
1
2
0
1
2
Szz(κ,ω)
κ
ω
c
1 2
1
2
0
1
2
Szz(κ,ω)
κ
ω
d
1 2
1
2
0
1
2
Figure 1. Szz(κ, ω) for the isotropic XY chain in a transverse field (J = 1)
at infinite temperature β = 0 (a) and zero temperature β → ∞ (b: Ω = 0, c:
Ω = 0.5, d: Ω = 0.9).
2J sin κ
2
sin
(
κ1 − κ
2
)
. The “dummy” wave vector κ1 in (2) varies within the region
−π 6 κ1 6 π. As a result, such an experimental probe “measures” a continuum
of the two-fermion excitations in the κ-ω plane. The upper boundary of the two-
fermion continuum is given by ω = 2|J sin κ
2
| and Szz(κ, ω) exhibits divergence along
this line as it follows from (2). At low temperatures β → ∞, the Fermi factors in (2)
come into play and Szz(κ, ω) becomes dependent on Ω. The additional conditions
Λκ1
< 0 and Λκ2
> 0 lead to the appearance of the lower boundary (for example,
ω = |J sin κ| if Ω = 0) at which a finite value of Szz(κ, ω) jumps to zero. The trans-
verse field (which plays a role of the chemical potential in the fermionic picture)
effects the lower boundary of the two-fermion continuum in the κ-ω plane and the
redistribution of the values of Szz(κ, ω) in the κ-ω plane at low temperatures. For
|Ω| > |J | Szz(κ, ω) vanishes everywhere in the κ-ω plane. The above-said can be
seen in figure 1 where some typical results illustrating zz dynamics are reported.
Contrary to the zz dynamics the xx dynamics is more involved: we do not know
the explicit expression for Sxx(κ, ω) similar to (2). Equation (2) arises after compu-
tation of the average of the product of four Fermi operators
〈(
1 − 2c+n (t)cn(t)
) (
1 − 2c+n+mcn+m
)〉
731
O.Derzhko
that is obviously the two-fermion quantity. The xx dynamic structure factor contains
the averages like
〈(
1 − 2c+1 (t)c1(t)
)
. . .
(
1 − 2c+n−1(t)cn−1(t)
) (
c+n (t) + cn(t)
)
×
(
1 − 2c+1 c1
)
. . .
(
1 − 2c+n+m−1cn+m−1
) (
c+n+m + cn+m
)〉
and thus it is a many-fermion quantity. However, the numerical calculations show
that the two-fermion continuum dominates the low-temperature behaviour of the xx
dynamic structure factor. Although Sxx(κ, ω) is not restricted to the two-fermion
continuum region in the κ-ω plane and has nonzero value above the upper bound-
ary of the two-fermion continuum (demonstrating the effects of the many-fermion
continua [11]) its value outside the two-fermion continuum is rather small. Sxx(κ, ω)
may be described by several washed-out excitation branches following roughly the
two-fermion continuum boundaries. Further studies are required to clarify why two-
fermion features rule the many-fermion quantity Sxx(κ, ω). For |Ω| > |J | the zero-
temperature xx dynamic structure factor Sxx(κ, ω) shows a single δ-peak along the
fermion branch ω = Λκ. In the high-temperature limit the low-temperature struc-
tures in κ-ω plane disappear and Sxx(κ, ω) becomes κ-independent in agreement
with exact calculations for β = 0 [12]. Alternatively the xx dynamics can be exam-
ined using a bosonization treatment [13], however, such an analysis is restricted to
low-energy physics and only a small region in the κ-ω plane can be explored by this
approach.
The described analysis of the dynamic properties may be extended to the ani-
sotropic XY interaction (Jx 6= Jy) [8] and the dimerized isotropic XY interaction
(Jx = Jy → J(1 − (−1)nδ), 0 6 δ 6 1 is the dimerization parameter) [8,9]. Appar-
ently, the exhaustive study of the zz dynamics for the former case [8] should be still
supplemented by the corresponding analysis of the xx dynamics whereas the case
when both anisotropy and dimerization are present requires a separate study. Re-
cently, the effects of periodic inhomogeneity on the dynamic susceptibility χzz(κ, ω)
(but not χxx(κ, ω)) have been reported in the paper on dynamics of isotropic XY
model on one-dimensional superlattices [14]. The xx dynamic quantities for the case
of extremely anisotropic XY interaction (J y = 0), i.e., for the spin- 1
2
transverse
Ising chain, are of interest for interpreting the experimental data on the dynamic
dielectric permittivity of the quasi-one-dimensional hydrogen-bonded ferroelectric
compound CsH2PO4 [15,16].
To end up this section, let us note that the dynamic properties of two-dimensional
quantum spin models can be also explained in terms of the two-fermion continuum,
however, such a picture may have only an approximate meaning [17]. Another in-
teresting question is to contrast the results for dynamic structure factors of spin- 1
2
and spin-1 chains [18].
3. Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction
The Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction is often present in the low-dimensional
quantum magnets (see, for example, a recent paper [19]). It is generally known
732
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
that the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction
∑
nD · (sn × sn+1) being added to the
Hamiltonian (1) does not destroy the rigorous treatment if D = (0, 0, D) [20]2.
The main effect of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction is the loss of the sym-
metry of elementary excitation energies with respect to the change κ→ −κ:
Λκ = D sin κ+
√
(
Ω +
Jx + Jy
2
cos κ
)2
+
(
Jx − Jy
2
)2
sin2 κ 6= Λ−κ
[20,22]. In the presence of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction some remarkable
changes in the thermodynamic and dynamic properties of spin chains may occur.
Consider, for example, the isotropic XY chain. Since the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya
interaction for such a chain (even inhomogeneous one) can be eliminated by the
local rotations in spin space around the z axis
sxn cosφn + syn sin φn → sxn, −sxn sinφn + syn cosφn → syn ,
φn = ϕ1 + . . .+ ϕn−1, tanϕm =
Dm
Jm
(3)
resulting in a model with isotropic XY interaction
√
J2
n +D2
n the zz dynamics
remains as for a chain without Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, however, with
renormalized energy scale J →
√
J2 +D2 3. In contrast, the xx dynamic quantities
according to (3) involve
〈sxn(t)sxn+m〉J,D = cosφn cosφn+m〈sxn(t)sxn+m〉√J2+D2,0
− cosφn sinφn+m〈sxn(t)syn+m〉√J2+D2,0
− sinφn cosφn+m〈syn(t)sxn+m〉√J2+D2,0
+ sinφn sinφn+m〈syn(t)syn+m〉√J2+D2,0 (4)
(for the homogeneous chain φn = (n−1)ϕ, tanϕ = D/J). In view of (4) the relation
between the zz and xx dynamics discussed in the previous section (Sxx(κ, ω) at low
temperatures exhibits the washed-out excitation branches which roughly follow the
boundaries of the two-fermion continuum which determines Szz(κ, ω)) may appear
to be more intricate [23]. In the next sections 4 and 5 we give further examples of
how the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction manifests itself in the properties of spin- 1
2
XY chains.
4. Correlated off-diagonal and diagonal disorder
The Jordan-Wigner transformation maps the spin- 1
2
isotropic XY chain in a
transverse field onto the chain of tight-binding spinless fermions with the on-site
2Let us note that in some cases the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction can be eliminated by the
corresponding spin-coordinate transformation [21] (see, for example, equation (3)).
3This is not the case if XY interaction is anisotropic; the zz dynamics of the model with
extremely anisotropic XY interaction, i.e., the transverse Ising chain with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya
interaction, was considered in [22].
733
O.Derzhko
energy Ω and hopping I = J/2. If the transverse fields are independent random
variables (diagonal disorder) each with the Lorentzian probability distribution
p(Ωn) =
1
π
Γ
(Ωn − Ω0)
2 + Γ2
the resulting fermionic model is the one-dimensional version of the Lloyd model.
The density of states,
ρ(E) =
1
N
N
∑
k=1
δ(E − Λk), (. . .) = . . .
∫
dΩnp(Ωn) . . . (. . .),
for the Lloyd model can be found exactly [24]. Going far beyond the idea of H.Ni-
shimori we may consider a spin model with the correlated off-diagonal and diagonal
Lorentzian disorder which after fermionization reduces to the one-dimensional ver-
sion of the extended Lloyd model introduced by W.John and J.Schreiber. Namely,
we consider the isotropic XY model with independent random exchange interactions
(off-diagonal disorder) given by the Lorentzian probability distribution
p(. . . , Jn, . . .) =
∏
n
p(Jn) =
∏
n
1
π
Γ
(Jn − J0)
2 + Γ2
. (5)
Moreover, we consider the correlated off-diagonal and diagonal disorder assuming
that the on-site transverse fields in the chain are determined by the surrounding
exchange interactions according to the relation
Ωn − Ω0 =
a
2
(Jn−1 + Jn − 2J0) , a is real, |a| > 1. (6)
Then the density of states ρ(E) yielding the thermodynamic quantities of the in-
troduced random spin chain can be calculated exactly [25,26]. To get ρ(E) we must
calculate the diagonal Green functions G∓
nn(E), since
ρ(E) = ∓ 1
π
=G∓
nn(E).
The set of equations of motion for G∓
nm(E ± iε), ε → +0 can be averaged using
contour integration in complex planes of random (Lorentzian) variables Jn. Using
the Gershgorin criterion we find the set of equations for the averaged Green func-
tions which has the same structure as before averaging but possesses translational
symmetry. As a result we obtain the desired quantities G∓
nm(E) and hence all ther-
modynamic quantities.
In figures 2a and 2b we present ρ(E) in the most interesting region |a| → 1, when
ρ(E) becomes not symmetric with respect to the change E−Ω0 → − (E − Ω0). Such
asymmetry immediately yields a nonzero (average) transverse magnetization
mz = −1
2
∫
dEρ(E) tanh
βE
2
6= 0
734
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
0.1
0.3
-2 0 2
ρ(E) a
-2 0 2 E-Ω0
b
-0.5
0.0
-2 0 2
-mz c
-2 0 2 Ω0
d
Figure 2. The density of states (a, b) and the transverse magnetization (c, d)
of the isotropic XY chain with correlated Lorentzian disorder (J0 = 1, Γ = 1,
a = −1 (a, c), a = 1 (b, d)). The dotted curves correspond to the nonrandom
case (Γ = 0).
at low temperatures β → ∞ at zero (average) transverse field Ω0 = 0 (figures 2c
and 2d). Let us consider more closely this somewhat unexpected magnetic property
of the introduced random spin chain. For a certain random realization of the chain
defined by (5), (6) one may expect the same numbers of sites surrounded by stronger
than J0 exchange interactions as the sites surrounded by weaker than J0 exchange
interactions. Because of (6) for Ω0 = 0 the transverse fields at the former and at the
latter sites have the same value but the opposite signs giving as a result
∑
n Ωn = 0.
On the other hand, one may expect that the sites surrounded by strong isotropic XY
exchange interactions exhibit small z magnetization whereas the sites surrounded
by weak isotropic XY exchange interactions exhibit large z magnetization (in the
opposite direction). As a result, the average transverse magnetization has a nonzero
value. As |a| increases, a difference in the oppositely directed z magnetizations be-
comes smaller. Thus, a nonzero mz at Ω0 = 0 appears owing to the imposed relation
(6) which expresses the condition of correlated disorder.
735
O.Derzhko
Some further insight into the origin of the asymmetry of ρ(E) can be obtained
after examining the moments of the density of states
M (r) ≡
∫
dEErρ(E)
=
1
N
N
∑
n=1
〈{
[. . . [cn, H] , . . . , H] , c+n
}〉
(7)
(here H is the Hamiltonian of fermions which represent the spin chain). It is just
the correlated disorder that yields a nonzero third moment M (3) 6= 04 at Ω0 = 0. For
not correlated off-diagonal and diagonal disorders one gets M (3) = 0 at Ω0 = 0. The
moments of the density of states can be calculated for any probability distribution of
random variables p(Jn) (not necessarily for the Lorentzian probability distribution),
for example, for the rectangle probability distribution. These calculations explicitly
demonstrate the cause of the asymmetry appearance in ρ(E) [27]. Some other results
on the effects of correlated disorder can be found in [10,28,29].
Finally, let us remark that the considered spin model with correlated Lorentzian
disorder may be extended by introducing the nonrandom Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya in-
teraction D. Another extension is to assume the exchange interaction to be nonran-
dom Jn = J whereas the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions Dn to be independent
random Lorentzian variables determining the transverse fields according to (6). Both
models are related to each other through a certain sequence of rotations of spin axes
around the z axis (being applied to the Hamiltonian with the exchange interactions
Dn and the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions −Jn it gives the Hamiltonian with the
exchange interactions Jn and the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions Dn) and hence
it is sufficient to consider only one of them. Considering, for example, the former
model one finds that the nonrandom Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction may lead to
the recovery of the symmetry with respect to the change E−Ω0 → − (E − Ω0) and
hence to a decrease of the nonzero value of mz at Ω0 = 0. Such an effect becomes
also apparent after calculating the moments of the density of states M (2) and M (3)
(7) for this model.
To end up this section, let us note that a different random spin- 1
2
XY chains
were rigorously analytically examined by Th.M.Nieuwenhuizen and coauthors [30].
5. Effects of regularly alternating bonds and fields
5.1. Continued fractions
The quantum spin chains with regularly alternating Hamiltonian parameters can
model dimerized (l-merized) chains, one-dimensional superlattices, one-dimensional
4Here (. . .) denotes the random averaging either for the correlated off-diagonal and diagonal
disorder or for the independent off-diagonal (with the probability distribution p(Jn)) and diagonal
(with the probability distribution p(Ωn) =
∫
dJn−1
∫
dJnp(Jn−1)p(Jn)δ
(
Ωn − Ω0 − a
2
(Jn−1 + Jn
−2J0))) disorders.
736
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
decorated chains etc. The case of spin- 1
2
XY chains supplemented by the contin-
ued fraction approach (for other approaches see [31]) remains amenable for rigorous
analysis of the thermodynamic properties if the exchange interaction is isotropic
(Jxn = Jyn) [32], extremely anisotropic (Jyn = 0) [33] or if Ωn = 0 [34]. The thermo-
dynamic quantities of the regularly alternating isotropic XY chain in a transverse
field can be obtained through the density of states ρ(E) = 1
N
∑N
k=1 δ(E − Λk). The
thermodynamic quantities of the regularly alternating transverse Ising chain and the
regularly alternating anisotropic XY chain without transverse field can be obtained
through the density of states R(E2) = 1
N
∑N
k=1 δ(E
2 − Λ2
k).
Let us recall that after fermionization of the isotropic XY chain in a transverse
field (Jxn = Jyn = 2In) one faces the Hamiltonian which is a bilinear fermion form.
While making it diagonal one arrives at the set of equations
In−1gk,n−1 + (Ωn − Λk) gkn + Ingk,n+1 = 0, (8)
here gkn are the coefficients of the linear transformation which make the initial bilin-
ear fermion form diagonal and Λk are the resulting elementary excitation energies.
Therefore, introducing the Green functions Gnm(E) according to
−In−1Gn−1,m(E) + (E − Ωn)Gnm(E) − InGn+1,m(E) = δnm (9)
one gets the density of states
ρ(E) = ∓ 1
πN
N
∑
n=1
=Gnn(E ± iε), ε→ +0.
For the transverse Ising chain (Jxn = 2In, J
y
n = 0) instead of (8) and (9) we have
Ωn−1In−1Φk,n−1 +
(
Ω2
n + I2
n−1 − Λ2
k
)
Φkn + ΩnInΦk,n+1 = 0 (10)
and
−Ωn−1In−1Gn−1,m(E2) +
(
E2 − I2
n−1 − Ω2
n
)
Gnm(E2) − ΩnInGn+1,m(E2) = δnm , (11)
respectively, whereas for the anisotropicXY chain without field (Jxn = 2Ixn, J
y
n = 2Iyn,
Ωn = 0) instead of (8) and (9) we have
Iyn−2I
x
n−1Φk,n−2 +
(
Ixn−1
2 + Iyn
2 − Λ2
k
)
Φkn + IynI
x
n+1Φk,n+2 = 0 (12)
and
−Iyn−2I
x
n−1Gn−2,m(E2) +
(
E2 − Ixn−1
2 − Iyn
2
)
Gnm(E2) − IynI
x
n+1Gn+2,m(E2) = δnm ,
(13)
respectively. For the last two models the Green functions Gnm(E2) yield the density
of states
R(E2) = ∓ 1
πN
N
∑
n=1
=Gnn(E2 ± iε), ε→ +0.
737
O.Derzhko
For a general case of the anisotropic XY chain in a transverse field a set of equations
like (10) or (12) is five diagonal banded (but not three diagonal banded as (8),
(10) or (12)) and the next step, i.e., the continued fraction representation for the
diagonal Green functions is less evident. According to equation (9), (11) or (13)
the diagonal Green functions for all these models can be represented in terms of
continued fractions. For example, from (13) it immediately follows that
Gnn(E2) =
1
E2 − Ixn−1
2 − Iyn
2 − ∆−
n − ∆+
n
,
∆−
n =
Iyn−2
2Ixn−1
2
E2 − Ixn−3
2 − Iyn−2
2 − Iy
n−4
2Ix
n−3
2
E2−Ix
n−5
2−Iy
n−4
2−...
,
∆+
n =
Iyn
2Ixn+1
2
E2 − Ixn+1
2 − Iyn+2
2 − Iy
n+2
2
Ix
n+3
2
E2−Ix
n+3
2−Iy
n+4
2−...
. (14)
If now the Hamiltonian parameters are periodic with any finite period p the contin-
ued fractions ∆∓
n in (14) become periodic and can be evaluated by solving square
equations. As a result, we get the exact expressions for Gnn(E2) (or Gnn(E) for the
isotropic XY chain) and hence for all thermodynamic quantities of the regularly
alternating spin chains in question.
Let us remark, that the thermodynamic quantities of the anisotropic XY chain
in a transverse field of period 2 were obtained in [35] in a different manner on a
quite general background. This scheme, however, becomes cumbersome if the pe-
riod of nonuniformity increases. Further development of a general approach to the
study of thermodynamic quantities and spin correlation functions has been report-
ed by L.L.Gonçalves with coworkers in connection with spin- 1
2
XY models on one-
dimensional superlattices.
5.2. Magnetization processes
The most spectacular manifestation of the effects of regular alternation can
be seen in the magnetization processes at low temperatures. Consider at first the
isotropic XY chain. Owing to regularly alternating parameters of the Hamiltonian
the fermion band splits into several subbands the number of which does not exceed
the period of regular inhomogeneity. This circumstance immediately suggests that
the zero-temperature dependence
mz = −1
2
∫
dEρ(E) tanh
βE
2
on Ω (we have assumed that Ωn = Ω + ∆Ωn) consists of horizontal parts (plateaus)
which appear when E = 0 remains in between subbands (given by ρ(E)) with
changing of Ω separated by the parts of varying mz which appear when E = 0
remains within subbands with Ω changing. Clearly, the number of plateaus does
738
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
not exceed the period of nonuniformity. Moreover, their heights −s 6 mz 6 s
are in agreement with the condition: p (s−mz) = integer with s = 1
2
[36]. This
conjecture was suggested on the model-independent background for a general spin-
s chain with axial symmetry in a uniform magnetic field using the Lieb-Schultz-
Mattis theorem and the bosonization arguments. Obviously, spin- 1
2
XY chain is
an easy case (represented by noninteracting fermions) contrary to the chains with
Heisenberg exchange interaction or higher spins s > 1
2
. On the other hand, the
magnetization curve for spin- 1
2
XY chain can be obtained explicitly. Moreover, the
elaborated scheme also permits to obtain the local (on-site) magnetizations. The on-
site magnetizations exhibit plateaus which begin and end up at the same values of Ω
as for the total magnetization, however, the plateaus heights (i.e., the values of the
on-site magnetizations) are not universal quantities no longer obeying the above-
mentioned condition and strongly depend on a concrete set of the Hamiltonian
parameters. Moreover, a sequence of sites n1, n2, . . . , np satisfying the inequalities
mzn1
6 mzn2
6 . . . 6 mznp
depends on the value of the applied field Ω. The step-like
behaviour of the zero-temperature dependence mz (mzn) vs. Ω is accompanied by
the corresponding zero-temperature behaviour χz = ∂mz/∂Ω (χzn = ∂mzn/∂Ω) vs.
Ω. The zero-temperature dependence χz on Ω behaves like −ρ(E = 0) vs. Ω thus
reproducing the density of states ρ(E).
In contrast to the isotropic XY chain, a regular alternation of the parameters
of the transverse Ising chain Hamiltonian does not lead to plateaus in the zero-
temperature dependence mz on Ω. The difference arises owing to the anisotropy
of XY interaction: if Jxn 6= Jyn one finds that [
∑
n s
z
n, H] 6= 0. Thus, even if the
spin system remains in the same ground state |0〉 with varying Ω the magnetization
〈0|
∑
n s
z
n|0〉, nevertheless, varies with varying Ω. As a result the dependence mz
vs. Ω does not exhibit horizontal parts. On the other hand, in the vicinity of some
fields Ω? (critical fields) the magnetization may behave as mz ∼ (Ω − Ω?) ln |Ω−Ω?|
and hence the susceptibility as χz ∼ ln |Ω − Ω?|. For the uniform chain there are
two critical fields Ω? = ±|I|. If the bonds become regularly alternating only the
values of Ω? change. For example, Ω? = ±
√
|I1I2| for p = 2, Ω? = ± 3
√
|I1I2I3| for
p = 3 etc. If the fields become regularly alternating not only the values of the critical
fields vary but the number of the critical fields may change. For example, assuming
Ω1,2 = Ω ± ∆Ω, ∆Ω > 0 one has either two critical fields Ω? = ±
√
∆Ω2 + |I1I2|
if ∆Ω <
√
|I1I2| or four critical fields Ω? = ±
√
∆Ω2 ± |I1I2| if ∆Ω >
√
|I1I2|.
The transverse field is a controlling parameter of the second-order quantum phase
transition in the spin- 1
2
Ising chain in a transverse field [37]. Thus, a number of the
quantum phase transition points governed by Ω in this model may increase due to a
regular alternation of the transverse fields presuming the strength of inhomogeneity
is sufficiently strong. For example, for p = 2 there may be either two or four quantum
phase transition points, for p = 3 there may be either two, or four, or six quantum
phase transition points etc. The critical behaviour remains unchanged and is just
like for the temperature driven phase transition in the square-lattice Ising model.
For example, the zero-temperature dependence χz vs. Ω always exhibits logarithmic
singularities the number of which depends on a concrete set of the Hamiltonian
739
O.Derzhko
parameters. It seems interesting to trace the changes in magnetization processes as
anisotropy of the exchange interaction varies between the isotropic and extremely
anisotropic limits.
0.2
0.4
-mz
a
0.2
0.4
b
0.2
0.4
0 1 2 Ω
c
Figure 3. The zero-temperature
magnetization curves for the
isotropic XY (a), transverse
Ising (b) and classical (c) chains
of period 2 (Jn = 1, Ω1,2 =
Ω ± ∆Ω, ∆Ω = 0 (solid curves),
∆Ω = 0.5 (long-dashed curves),
∆Ω = 1 (short-dashed curves),
∆Ω = 1.5 (dotted curves)).
It is instructive to compare the zero-
temperature magnetization processes in the
quantum and classical XY chains5. A classical
chain consists of arrows (vectors) s = (s, θ, φ),
s = 1
2
, 0 6 θ 6 π, 0 6 φ < 2π which in-
teract with each other and an external (trans-
verse) field. The classical isotropic XY chain is
described by the Hamiltonian
H =
∑
n
Ωs cos θn
+
∑
n
Js2 sin θn sin θn+1 cos (φn − φn+1) (15)
(compare with (1)). The Hamiltonian of
the classical transverse Ising chain contains
cosφn cosφn+1 instead of cos (φn − φn+1) in the
interspin interaction terms in (15). Consider fur-
ther a chain of period 2 with Ω1,2 = Ω ± ∆Ω,
∆Ω > 0, J1,2 = J . The ground-state energy
ansatz for both the isotropic XY and transverse
Ising chains reads
E0(θ1, θ2) =
N
2
s ((Ω + ∆Ω) cos θ1
+ (Ω − ∆Ω) cos θ2) −N |J |s2 sin θ1 sin θ2 (16)
and θ1, θ2 are determined from the equations
(Ω + ∆Ω) sin θ1 + 2|J |s cos θ1 sin θ2 = 0,
(Ω − ∆Ω) sin θ2 + 2|J |s sin θ1 cos θ2 = 0 (17)
to provide a minimum of E0(θ1, θ2) (16). The
on-site magnetizations have the component ar-
bitrary directed in the xy plane with |m⊥n| =
s sin θn (n = 1, 2) for the isotropic XY case or
the component directed along the x axis with
|mxn| = s sin θn for the transverse Ising case
and the z component given by mz
n = s cos θn in
both cases. The components of the total mag-
netization per site are then as follows m⊥ =
5Rigorous calculations of the initial static susceptibility tensor for another nonuniform classical
chain, i.e., the spin- 1
2
Ising chain, can be found in [38].
740
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
1
2
(m⊥1 +m⊥2) or mx = 1
2
(mx1 +mx2) (if J < 0) and mz = 1
2
(mz1 +mz2). Equa-
tions (17) may be solved analytically yielding the ground-state energy and the on-
site magnetizations m⊥1 (mx1), m⊥2 (mx2), mz1, mz2. In figure 3 we contrast the
zero-temperature magnetization curves for the isotropic XY , transverse Ising and
classical chains of period 2. Note, that the classical isotropic XY chain similarly
to its quantum counterpart may exhibit plateaus in the dependence mz vs. Ω. Ev-
idently, it would be interesting to examine a quantum-to-classical crossover in the
magnetization curves. Probably a real-space renormalization-group method aimed
on the study of quantum fields on a lattice and applied in [39] to the spin- 1
2
trans-
verse Ising chain may be used to analyse the spin-1 chain, that is, an intermediate
case between the quantum (s = 1
2
) and the classical (s→ ∞) cases.
Exact results for the magnetization curves of spin- 1
2
XY chains may be employed
to test the strong-coupling approach that is a widely used approximate approach in
the theory of low-dimensional spin systems consisting of periodically repeating units
(spin chains with a periodic modulation of the intersite interactions or spin ladders)
[40].
5.3. Spin-Peierls instability
Since the paper of P.Pincus [41] we know that the spin- 1
2
isotropic XY chain is
unstable with respect to a lattice dimerization due to the spin-Peierls mechanism6.
Really, the ground-state energy per site of the dimerized spin chain (i.e., with Jn =
J (1 − (−1)nδ)) is given by
e0(δ) = −|J |
π
∫ ψ
0
dϕ
√
1 − (1 − δ2) sin2 ϕ− |Ω|
(
1
2
− ψ
π
)
, (18)
ψ =
0, if |J | 6 |Ω|,
arcsin
√
1−Ω2/J2
1−δ2 , if δ|J | 6 |Ω| < |J |,
π
2
, if |Ω| < δ|J |.
At Ω = 0 the ground-state energy per site (18) (e0(δ) ≈ e0(0) + |J |
2π
δ2 ln δ, δ � 1)
decreases rapidly enough in comparison with the increase of the elastic energy per
site αδ2 as δ increases to provide a minimum of the total energy per site e0(δ)+αδ2
at a nonzero value of the dimerization parameter δ?. The external field may destroy
dimerization: if Ω exceeds a certain value the dimerized phase cannot survive and the
uniform phase becomes favourable. The phase diagram shown in figure 4a specifies
the region of stability/metastability of the dimerized phase at zero temperature.
It is generally known (see, for example, a review on CuGeO3 [43]) that the in-
crease of external field leads to a transition from the dimerized phase to the incom-
mensurate phase rather than to the uniform phase that contradicts to what is seen
in figure 4. Obviously, the incommensurate phase cannot appear within the frames
of the adopted ansatz for lattice distortion δ1δ2δ1δ2 . . . , δ1 + δ2 = 0. Therefore, we
6This conclusion was obtained within the adiabatic approximation; the corresponding treatment
within the nonadiabatic approximation is more sophisticated [42].
741
O.Derzhko
0.4
0.8
Ω
a
A
B1
B2 C
0.4
0.8
b
A
B1
B2 C
0.4
0.8
0.2 0.5 α
c
A
B1
B2 C
Figure 4. The phase diagram of the
isotropic XY chain (J = 1) in the
plane lattice stiffness α – transverse
field Ω which indicates the regions of
stability/metastability of the dimer-
ized and uniform phases at zero tem-
perature. A (C) – only dimerized
(uniform) phase occurs; B1 (B2) both
phases are possible but the dimerized
(uniform) is the favourable one. The
phase diagram also illustrates the
possible effects of the Dzyaloshinskii-
Moriya interaction (a: D = 0, b: D =
0.5, k = 1, c: D = 0.5, k = 0).
should assume Jn = J (1 + δn) and exam-
ine the total energy E0 ({δn})+
∑
n αδ
2
n for
different lattice distortions {δn}. We intro-
duce a trial distortion of the form
δn = −δ cos
(
2π
p
n
)
, (19)
where p is the period of modulation and
analyse numerically (N = 1000) the total
energy to reveal which spin-Peierls phase is
realized in the presence of external field (for
details see [44]). Comparing the behaviour
of the total energy for p = 2 and p = 1.9,
p = 2.1 as Ω increases we conclude that
a long-period structure does arise if Ω ex-
ceeds a certain value. The dimerized phase
transforms into a long-period phase rather
than into the uniform phase while the field
increases. The important conclusion of fur-
ther computations using (19) is that the
dimerized phase persists up to a certain
characteristic field. Further, in moderate
fields the lattice parameterized by (19) may
exhibit short-period phases, for example,
the trimerized phase with p = 3 [45] (an-
other possible lattice distortion which pre-
serves the chain length is δ1 = −δ2). How-
ever, a behaviour of the trimerized phase is
essentially different in comparison with that
of the dimerized phase: for any small devia-
tion of the field from the value at which the
trimerized phase occurs there exists such a
long-periodic structure for which the lattice
distortion (19) gives smaller total energy
than for p = 3. Thus, contrary to the dimer-
ized phase, the trimerized phase does not
persist with the field varying and it contin-
uously transforms into a certain long-period
phase with the field varying. In strong fields
the uniform lattice can be expected. Clear-
ly, such a study is restricted to the adopt-
ed ansatz (19) (although any other (but
not all) distortion pattern may be assumed)
and therefore we can say for sure which lat-
742
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
tice distortion is not realized rather than to point out which lattice distortion should
occur.
It is interesting to discuss the effect of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction
on the spin-Peierls dimerization. For this purpose we should find the ground-state
energy of the chain of period 2 with a sequence of parameters
ΩJ1D1ΩJ2D2ΩJ1D1ΩJ2D2 . . . .
Moreover, J1,2 = J(1 ± δ) and D1,2 = D(1 ± kδ). Putting k = 0 one has a chain in
which D does not depend on the lattice distortion, whereas for k = 1 the dependence
of D on the lattice distortion is the same as that for the isotropic XY exchange
interaction. In the limit of small δ � 1 (valid for lattices with large values of α
and corresponding to the experimental situation) the analysis becomes extremely
simple. It is convenient to introduce the parameter
ℵ =
J2 + kD2
J2 +D2
.
Consider, for example, the case Ω = 0. After a simple rescaling of variables one
arrives at the equations considered in [41] and as a result
δ? ∼ 1
ℵ exp
(
− 2πα√
J2 +D2ℵ2
)
.
We immediately conclude that for k = 1 nonzero D leads to the increase of the
dimerization parameter δ?, whereas for k = 0 nonzero D leads to the decrease
of δ?. Thus, the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction may act either in favour of the
dimerization or against it. The actual result of its effect depends on the dependence
of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction on the amplitude of the lattice distortion
in comparison with the corresponding dependence of the isotropic XY exchange
interaction. Comparing figure 4a and figures 4b, 4c one can see the described effects
of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction on the spin-Peierls dimerization.
Finally, let us make some remarks on the exchange interaction anisotropy effects
on the spin-Peierls dimerization. Consider the anisotropic XY chain (without field).
In the isotropic limit it exhibits the spin-Peierls dimerized phase, whereas in the
extremely anisotropic limit (Ising chain) the ground-state energy does not depend
on δ and the spin-Peierls dimerization cannot occur. Therefore, it is attracting to
follow how anisotropy of the exchange interaction destroys the dimerized phase
and to find, in particular, a critical value of anisotropy above which the dimerized
phase cannot appear. The consideration becomes even more complicated in the
presence of an external (transverse) field. Note, however, that such a study could be
performed many years ago on the basis of the results for the anisotropic XY chain
in a transverse field of period 2 reported in [35].
Another issue which deserves to be studied in detail is related to a spin-Peierls
instability of the spin- 1
2
transverse Ising chain [33]. By direct inspection one can make
sure that although the ground-state energy of the dimerized Ising chain in a constant
743
O.Derzhko
transverse field Ω decreases as δ increases, however, not sufficiently rapidly (for any
Ω) to get a gain in the total energy. As a result no spin-Peierls dimerization should be
anticipated. On the other hand, the transverse Ising chain is unitary equivalent to the
anisotropic XY chain without field. By comparison of the diagonal Green functions
(see equation (14) in the present paper and equation (8) in [33, J. Phys. A]) it can
be found that the Helmholtz free energy of the anisotropic XY chain without field of
N sites IxnI
y
nI
x
n+1I
y
n+1 . . . is the sum of the Helmholtz free energies of two transverse
Ising chains ΩnInΩn+1In+1 . . . of N/2 sites, namely,
. . . Ixn−1I
y
nI
x
n+1I
y
n+2 . . .
and
. . . Iyn−1I
x
nI
y
n+1I
x
n+2 . . . .
Consider at first the following isotropic XY chain Ixn = Iyn = I (1 − (−1)nδ) which
exhibits the spin-Peierls dimerization. In view of the mentioned correspondence the
introduced model is thermodynamically equivalent to two uniform transverse Ising
chains (both with the transverse field I(1 + δ) (or I(1 − δ)) and the Ising exchange
interaction I(1− δ) (or I(1+ δ))) and thus we conclude that the critical Ising chain
(Ω = I) is unstable with respect to a uniform extending (or shortening) accompa-
nied by the corresponding increase (decrease) of the transverse field. Further, it is
known that the quadrimerized isotropic XY chain without field may be energetically
favourable in comparison with the uniform chain (although yielding a smaller gain
in the total energy than the dimerized chain). Consider, therefore, such a chain of
period 4 with In = I ′(1 + δ), In+1 = I ′′(1 + δ), In+2 = I ′(1 − δ), In+3 = I ′′(1 − δ)
which is unstable with respect to a lattice distortion characterizing by nonzero value
of δ for certain values of I ′, I ′′. This model exhibits the same thermodynamics as
two identical transverse Ising chains of period 2 ΩnInΩn+1In+1ΩnInΩn+1In+1 . . . with
Ωn = I ′′(1−δ), Ωn+1 = I ′′(1+δ) and In = I ′(1+δ), In+1 = I ′(1−δ). These arguments
indicate a possibility of the spin-Peierls bond dimerization of the spin- 1
2
transverse
Ising chain accompanied by the coherent modulation of the on-site transverse fields.
6. Skipped items and summary
Needless to say that many important contributions have appeared out of the
scope of this brief survey. Let us discuss in a telegraph-style manner some of them.
Numerous works were devoted to the analysis of the properties of spin- 1
2
XY chains
with aperiodic or random Hamiltonian parameters [46] (as, for example, an extensive
real-space renormalization-group treatment of the random transverse Ising chain by
D.S.Fisher).
One of the interesting subjects in the theory of magnetic materials is the magnetic
relaxation in spin systems and, in particular, the impurity spin relaxation in spin
systems. Spin-1
2
XY chains provide a possibility to rigorously study the relaxation
phenomena in one-dimensional spin models containing impurities [47,3]. A single
impurity may be assumed in the sense that the interaction with its neighbours is
744
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
different in strength (J ′ 6= J). The impurity spin may be located either at the
boundary of the system (J1 = J ′, J2 = J3 = . . . = J) or in the bulk (e.g., JN
2
−1 =
JN
2
= J ′ and Jn = J for all other n). After the Jordan-Wigner transformation one
faces a chain of tight-binding fermions with the impurity site (in the sense that the
hopping amplitude(s) surrounding this site is (are) different in value) the energy
spectrum of which is well-known (if J ′ < Jc the elementary excitation energies form
a band whereas if J ′ > Jc two states emerge from the band; moreover, Jc =
√
2J
(Jc = J) for the boundary (bulk) impurity). Nevertheless, the time dependence of
the equilibrium autocorrelation functions 〈sαn(t)sαn〉 is not obvious since they are
two-fermion (zz) or, generally speaking, many-fermion (xx) quantities. The time-
dependent autocorrelation functions 〈sαn(t)sαn〉 for the impurity spin or for the spins
in its vicinity may exhibit new types of asymptotic behaviour depending on the
relation between J and J ′ and temperature. The impurity relaxation may become
even more complicated in the presence of an external (transverse) field.
Spin-1
2
XY chains have been used to study the nonequilibrium properties of
quantum systems [48]. Z.Rácz with coworkers suggested to consider a nonequilib-
rium system imposing a current on a system and investigating the steady states.
Alternatively, we can gain an understanding of the nonequlibrium properties exam-
ining the dynamics of an initial state (for example, a kink or droplet configuration
of z on-site magnetizations).
Recently a study of the transport properties (for example, of the thermal con-
ductivity) of low-dimensional spin systems which are significantly determined by
magnetic excitations have attracted much interest [49]. A simple case of the isotrop-
ic XY chain emerges in such studies as a milestone providing reference results for
more sophisticated models.
Finally, some exotic applications of spin- 1
2
XY chains have appeared recent-
ly. For example, in connection with quantum information processing the numeri-
cal/analytical computations of entanglement in spin- 1
2
XY models on one-dimen-
sional lattices of small/infinite number of sites were carried out [50]. A study of
the correlation function which is called the emptiness formation probability (i.e.,
the probability of the formation of a ferromagnetic string in the antiferromagnet-
ic ground state) yields interesting links between statistical mechanics and number
theory. The case of the isotropic XY chain provides a valuable background for cal-
culation of such correlation functions [51].
We hope that the present review shows that spin- 1
2
XY chains still contain quite
unexplored properties which deserve to be discussed. A serious advantage of this
type of models is a possibility to perform statistical mechanical calculations either
rigorously analytically or exactly numerically (considering as long chains as required
to obtain results which pertain to the thermodynamic limit). On the other hand, it
is always desirable to clarify afterwards the relation of the obtained results to more
realistic models (with the Heisenberg interaction, interchain interaction, s > 1
2
).
Many interesting questions in the theory of these quantum spin chains still remain
open and call for new efforts.
745
O.Derzhko
7. Acknowledgements
The author thanks Taras Krokhmalskii, Taras Verkholyak and Oles’ Zaburannyi
for discussions. This work was partly supported by the STCU under the project
No. 1673. The author is grateful to doctor Janush Sanotsky who made it possible
to prepare the paper in due time.
References
1. Kenzelmann M., Coldea R., Tennant D.A., Visser D., Hofmann M., Smeibidl P., Tyl-
czynski Z. // Phys. Rev. B, 2002, vol. 65, 144432.
2. Farias G.A., Gonçalves L.L. // Physica status solidi (b), 1987, vol. 139, p. 315.
3. Stolze J., Nöppert A., Müller G. // Phys. Rev. B, 1995, vol. 52, p. 4319; Stolze J.,
Vogel M. // Phys. Rev. B, 2000, vol. 61, p. 4026.
4. Asakawa H. // Physica A, 1996, vol. 233, p. 39.
5. Young A.P., Rieger H. // Phys. Rev. B, 1996, vol. 53, p. 8486; Young A.P. // Phys.
Rev. B, 1997, vol. 56, p. 11691; Sachdev S., Young A.P. // Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997,
vol. 78, p. 2220.
6. Derzhko O., Krokhmalskii T. // Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur (Kharkiv), 1997, vol. 23,
p. 721; Phys. Rev. B, 1997, vol. 56, p. 11659; Physica status solidi (b), 1998, vol. 208,
p. 221.
7. Braeter H., Kowalski J.M. // Physica A, 1977, vol. 87, p. 243; Derzhko O., Krokhmal-
skii T. // Visnyk L’viv. univ., ser. fiz., 1993, No. 26, p. 47 (in Ukrainian); Ferroelectrics,
1994, vol. 153, p. 55; J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1995, vol. 140–144, p. 1623; Visnyk
L’viv. univ., ser. fiz., 1995, No. 27, p. 21 (in Ukrainian); Ferroelectrics, 1997, vol. 192,
p. 21; Derzhko O., Krokhmalskii T., Verkholyak T. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1996,
vol. 157/158, p. 421; Materials Science & Engineering A, 1997, vol. 226–228, p. 1049;
Philosophical Magazine B, 1997, vol. 76, p. 855.
8. Taylor J.H., Müller G. // Physica A, 1985, vol. 130, p. 1; Viswanath V.S., Müller G.
The Recursion Method. Application to Many-body Dynamics. Berlin, Heidelberg,
Springer-Verlag, 1994.
9. Derzhko O., Krokhmalskii T., Stolze J. // J. Phys. A, 2000, vol. 33, p. 3063; Czechoslo-
vak Journal of Physics, 2002, vol. 52, p. 321; J. Phys. A, 2002, vol. 35, p. 3573.
10. Derzhko O., Krokhmalskii T. // Physica status solidi (b), 2000, vol. 217, p. 927;
Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 1999, vol. 8, p. SI-45.
11. Barnes T. Preprint cond-mat/0204115.
12. Perk J.H.H., Capel H.W. // Physica A, 1980, vol. 100, p. 1.
13. Rao S., Sen D. Preprint cond-mat/0005492 (and references therein).
14. de Lima J.P., Gonçalves L.L. // Physica A, 2002, vol. 311, p. 458.
15. Plascak J.A., Pires A.S.T., Sá Barreto F.C. // Solid State Commun., 1982, vol. 44,
p. 787; Watarai S., Matsubara T. // J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 1984, vol. 53, p. 3648;
Derzhko O.V., Levitskii R.R., Sorokov S.I. // Ukrainian Journal of Physics, 1990,
vol. 35, p. 1421 (in Ukrainian); Florencio J., Sá Barreto F.C. // Phys. Rev. B, 1999,
vol. 60, p. 9555.
16. Yukhnovskii I.R., Levitskii R.R., Sorokov S.I., Derzhko O.V. // Izv. AN SSSR, ser.
fiz., 1991, vol. 55, p. 481 (in Russian); Sorokov S.I., Levitskii R.R. Thermodynamics
and longitudinal dynamical properties of the 1D Ising model in a transverse field.
746
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
Preprint of the Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, ICMP–94–3E, L’viv, 1994,
20 p.; Levitskii R.R., Sokolovskii R.O., Sorokov S.I. // Condens. Matter Phys., 1997,
No. 10, p. 67; Levitskii R.R., Sorokov S.I., Baran O.R. // Condens. Matter Phys.,
2000, vol. 3, p. 515.
17. Derzhko O. // Journal of Physical Studies (L’viv), 2001, vol. 5, p. 49; Derzhko O.,
Krokhmalskii T. // Acta Physica Polonica B, 2001, vol. 32, p. 3421; J. Magn. Magn.
Mater., 2002, vol. 242–245, p. 778; Derzhko O., Richter J., Verkholyak T. // Acta Phys-
ica Polonica B, 2001, vol. 32, p. 3427; Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 2002, vol. 52,
p. A41; Derzhko O., Verkholyak T., Schmidt R., Richter J. Preprint cond-mat/0207179
(to appear in Physica A); Nunner T.S., Kopp T. Preprint cond-mat/0210103.
18. Schulz H.J. // Phys. Rev. B, 1986, vol. 34, p. 6372; Kolezhuk A.K., Mikeska H.-J.
Preprint cond-mat/0202171.
19. Tsukada I., Takeya J., Masuda T., Uchinokura K. // Phys. Rev. Lett., 2001, vol. 87,
127203.
20. Kontorovich V.M., Tsukernik V.M. // Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 1967, vol. 52, p. 1446
(in Russian); Siskens Th., Capel H.W., Gaemers K.J.F. // Physica A, 1975, vol. 79,
p. 259; Siskens Th., Capel H.W. // Physica A, 1975, vol. 79, p. 296; Zvyagin A.A. //
Phys. Lett. A, 1991, vol. 158, p. 333; Daniel M., Amuda R. // Phys. Rev. B, 1996,
vol. 53, p. R2930; Gottlieb D., Rössler J. // Phys. Rev. B, 1999, vol. 60, p. 9232;
Pires A.S.T. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2001, vol. 223, p. 304.
21. Oshikawa M., Affleck I. // Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, vol. 79, p. 2883; Aristov D.N.,
Maleyev S.V. // Phys. Rev. B, 2000, vol. 62, p. R751; Derzhko O., Richter J., Zabu-
rannyi O. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 2000, vol. 12, p. 8661.
22. Derzhko O.V., Levitskii R.R., Moina A.Ph. // Condens. Matter Phys., 1993, No. 1,
p. 115 (in Ukrainian); Derzhko O.V., Moina A.Ph. // Condens. Matter Phys., 1994,
No. 3, p. 3; Ferroelectrics, 1994, vol. 153, p. 49; Physica status solidi (b), 1996, vol. 196,
p. 237.
23. Bocquet M., Essler F.H.L., Tsvelik A.M., Gogolin A.O. Preprint cond-mat/0102138.
24. Lloyd P. // J. Phys. C, 1969, vol. 2, p. 1717; Nishimori H. // Phys. Lett. A, 1984,
vol. 100, p. 239; Derzhko O., Verkholyak T. // Physica status solidi (b), 1997, vol. 200,
p. 255; Materials Science & Engineering A, 1997, vol. 226–228, p. 745; Fizika Nizkikh
Temperatur (Kharkiv), 1997, vol. 23, p. 977.
25. John W., Schreiber J. // Physica status solidi (b), 1974, vol. 66, p. 193; Richter J.,
Handrich K., Schreiber J. // Physica status solidi (b), 1975, vol. 68, p. K61; Richter J.,
Schreiber J., Handrich K. // Physica status solidi (b), 1976, vol. 74, p. K125; Richter J.
// Physica status solidi (b), 1978, vol. 87, p. K89.
26. Derzhko O., Richter J. // Phys. Lett. A, 1996, vol. 222, p. 348; Phys. Rev. B, 1997,
vol. 55, p. 14298; Phys. Rev. B, 1999, vol. 59, p. 100.
27. Derzhko O., Richter J., Derzhko V. // Annalen der Physik (Leipzig), 1999, vol. 8,
p. SI-49.
28. Gonçalves L.L., Vieira A.P. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1998, vol. 177/181, p. 79.
29. Derzhko O., Krokhmalskii T. // Journal of Physical Studies (L’viv), 1998, vol. 2,
p. 263; Derzhko O., Krokhmalskii T., Zaburannyi O. // Condens. Matter Phys., 1999,
vol. 2, p. 339.
30. Nieuwenhuizen T.M. // J. Phys. A, 1984, vol. 17, p. 1111; Nieuwenhuizen T.M.,
Luck J.M. // J. Phys. A, 1986, vol. 19, p. 1207; Luck J.M., Nieuwenhuizen T.M.
// J. Phys. A, 1989, vol. 22, p. 2151; Funke M., Nieuwenhuizen T.M., Trimper S.
747
O.Derzhko
// J. Phys. A, 1989, vol. 22, p. 5097; Luck J.M., Funke M., Nieuwenhuizen T.M. //
J. Phys. A, 1991, vol. 24, p. 4155.
31. de Lima J.P., Gonçalves L.L. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1995, vol. 140–144, p. 1606;
J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1999, vol. 206, p. 135; Barbosa Filho F.F., de Lima J.P.,
Gonçalves L.L. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2001, vol. 226–230, p. 638; Tong P.,
Zhong M. // Physica B, 2001, vol. 304, p. 91; Strečka J., Jaščur M. // Czechoslo-
vak Journal of Physics, 2002, vol. 52, p. A37.
32. Derzhko O. // Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur (Kharkiv), 1999, vol. 25, p. 575; Derzhko O.,
Richter J., Zaburannyi O. // Phys. Lett. A, 1999, vol. 262, p. 217; Acta Physica
Polonica A, 2000, vol. 97, p. 931; Physica A, 2000, vol. 282, p. 495; J. Magn. Magn.
Mater., 2000, vol. 222, p. 207.
33. Derzhko O. // J. Phys. A, 2000, vol. 33, p. 8627; Derzhko O., Zaburannyi O. //
Ukrainian Journal of Physics, 2002, vol. 47, p. 599 (in Ukrainian); Derzhko O.,
Richter J., Zaburannyi O. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 2002, vol. 242–245, p. 778;
Derzhko O., Richter J., Krokhmalskii T., Zaburannyi O. // Phys. Rev. B, 2002, vol. 66,
p. 144401.
34. Derzhko O. // Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 2002, vol. 52, p. A277.
35. Perk J.H.H., Capel H.W., Zuilhof M.J., Siskens Th.J. // Physica A, 1975, vol. 81,
p. 319.
36. Oshikawa M., Yamanaka M., Affleck I. // Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, vol. 78, p. 1984.
37. Sachdev S. Quantum Phase Transitions. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
38. Idogaki T., Rikitoku M., Tucker J.W. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1996, vol. 152, p. 311;
Derzhko O., Zaburannyi O. // Journal of Physical Studies (L’viv), 1998, vol. 2, p. 128;
Derzhko O., Zaburannyi O., Tucker J.W. // J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1998, vol. 186,
p. 188.
39. Drell S.D., Weinstein M., Yankielowicz S. // Phys. Rev. D, 1977, vol. 16, p. 1769.
40. Cabra D.C., Grynberg M.D., Honecker A., Pujol P. Preprint cond-mat/0010376 (and
references therein); Grynberg M.D., Cabra D.C., Arlego M. // Phys. Rev. B, 2001,
vol. 64, p. 134419; Derzhko O. // Ukrainian Journal of Physics, 2001, vol. 46, p. 762.
41. Pincus P. // Solid State Commun., 1971, vol. 9, p. 1971; Beni G., Pincus P. //
J. Chem. Phys., 1972, vol. 57, p. 3531; Beni G. // J. Chem. Phys., 1973, vol. 58,
p. 3200.
42. Sil S. // J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 1998, vol. 10, p. 8851.
43. Boucher J.P., Regnault L.P. // J. Phys. I France, 1996, vol. 6, p. 1939.
44. Derzhko O., Krokhmalskii T. // Ferroelectrics, 2001, vol. 250, p. 397.
45. Okamoto K. // Solid State Commun., 1992, vol. 83, p. 1039.
46. Pfeuty P. // Phys. Lett. A, 1979, vol. 72, p. 245; Luck J.M. // Journal of Statisti-
cal Physics, 1993, vol. 72, p. 417; Fisher D.S. // Phys. Rev. B, 1995, vol. 51, p. 6411;
McKenzie R.H. // Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996, vol. 77, p. 4804; Iglói F., Turban L., Karevs-
ki D., Szalma F. // Phys. Rev. B, 1997, vol. 56, p. 11031; Henelius P., Girvin S.M.
// Phys. Rev. B, 1998, vol. 57, p. 11457; Hermisson J., Grimm U., Baake M. Preprint
cond-mat/9706106; Hermisson J. Preprint cond-mat/9808238.
47. Tjon J.A. // Phys. Rev. B, 1970, vol. 2, p. 2411.
48. Antal T., Rácz Z., Sasvári L. // Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, vol. 78, p. 167; Antal T.,
Rácz Z., Rákos A., Schütz G.M. // Phys. Rev. E, 1998, vol. 57, p. 5184; Antal T.,
Rácz Z., Rákos A., Schütz G.M. // Phys. Rev. E, 1999, vol. 59, p. 4912; Rácz Z. //
Journal of Statistical Physics, 2000, vol. 101, p. 273; Ogata Y. // Phys. Rev. E, 2002,
748
Studying spin- 1
2
XY chains
vol. 66, 016135; Karevski D. // Eur. Phys. J. B, 2002, vol. 27, p. 147; Berim G.O.,
Cabrera G.G. // Physica A, 1997, vol. 238, p. 211; Berim G.O., Berim S., Cabrera G.G.
// Phys. Rev. B, 2002, vol. 66, p. 094401.
49. Heidrich-Meisner F., Honecker A., Cabra D.C., Brenig W. // Phys. Rev. B, 2002, vol.
66, p. 140406(R).
50. Fu H., Solomon A.I., Wang X. // J. Phys. A, 2002, vol. 35, p. 4293; Osborne T.J.,
Nielsen M.A. Preprint quant-ph/0202162; Bose I., Chattopadhyay E. Preprint cond-
mat/0208011.
51. Shiroishi M., Takahashi M., Nishiyama Y. Preprint cond-mat/0106062; Boos H.E.,
Korepin V.E., Nishiyama Y., Shiroishi M. Preprint cond-mat/0202346; Abanov A.G.,
Korepin V.E. Preprint cond-mat/0206353.
���������
��
�������
��
����������������� �
!��"���#����$%�&$'��()��$'�
* �,+���� - ��.
�
� . -/� * ��01032
�1.�������4
1
2
XY 5 �����
0�(�67�
8)9 :';�<>=@?BA'CED F
CHG IKJMLONOLQPRL�SUT VBNXWRNYWQZ[IR\�]XIKJKZ[^M_XI`Nba
J`N`JMLM]Xced>f
dhg�WRi`_KjkI`N>l
mXnpo7qpq�r�s ^KT ^plR^tPRu�vRw�^bxpI`yXT y s WQZ[z{Z�l q
F1| _BS}]b\ i`_�LM]`Z[ip]OLON`~OIKZ`jMSUT VBNXWRN
r�s ^KT ^bJ s WQZ[z{ZYIO_XyXT Z[IO_Ou s IKZ[z{Z�PBI`T ^b]XipJ`NOLM]OLQP}T c�vbG ^M_XIO_���i`_XI`W�_
mXnpopop�
r�s ^KT ^pl��}i`_Xz{Z[c�_XIKZ[^M_>l qM�
���p�����
���X�����B�7�[�>���p�h�>���������
� ipZX�BuX]XIKZ�Z[z�up�M\@\�]B�pWRNbahIK]b\�_X^KI`T a�ip]BVRPRu s LR_OLOT ^}V�JMLR_OLON`JMLON`~OIKZ`j�c
]bab_XI`T �
WRN�ZK\ IKZ[^KNXc�T i/I`Nba�J`�pT Ip�
1
2
XY
J`N`JMLM]Xc�vR �JKZX�Bu[NX^M_
PB^M_Xz¡_
VB^b]Xi/IMPRLR_UIO_�\ N/�
IO_Xc�T ~OI`TKTtLM]Xi/c
ZK\ NXIO_Xc�T ~OI`TK^tup_`JMLONX^bZXJMLOTKc
ZK\�]OuX]X¢£Vh^MVb_`xpc
ZK\ T xp¤3��Vb�buXZ>�
¥ NXIKJ s WQZ[z{Z>��¦§Z[i/T �[l7J`WQZ[ip]Ou s Z[^M_XI`NXc¨�X]BVRup_b\�Z[c©T�ip]XzªPRup�pi/IKZ)VBc�T I`I`NXc�N
�K_Xi`_Xc
]OLOi`_Xc�N}z¡_Xc�T u s LMZ[I`T _XIO_>v
«>¬ �®`¯�°X±t²`¬�¯�°p³7´`µO¶p· ¸�¹
1
2
XY º[» ¸p¼/½�¾�¿tÀ/ÁKÂKà »XÄOÅ�ÆtÇ · ÈÉUÃRÈ º�Æ`Ê ÀX¸/ËOÌb¿ Æ`Í�Æ ¹ÏÎ ÆOÐ · È`ÁBËO¿ ÆOÐ7ÑMº Ì Æ Â » ¸pÀXÒ�Ó Ñ Ã º[»tÇ ÁK¶ º[»`ÔEƸ »`Å�»`Í ¸p· Õ Ñ ¸ Æ Ë Ô · ÁOËO¶p· ¸�¹ÏÖ » Ò ÄRÐXº Ë Æ Â » ¸ Ñ Ë Ô · ÒX¿t· Ë Ô Ì
×XØ�Ù�Ú�´pÛbÜXÝ�Þ�ßpÝ�¹áà
749
750
|