Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures

We study transport of spin-polarized electrons through a magnetic single-electron transistor (SET) in the presence of an external magnetic field. Assuming the SET to have a nanometer-sized central island with a single electron level, we find that the zero-frequency shot noise diverges as the on-do...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2007
Hauptverfasser: Gorelik, L.Y., Kulinich, S.I., Shekhter, R.I., Jonson, M., Vinokur, V.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України 2007
Schriftenreihe:Физика низких температур
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/120931
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures / L.Y. Gorelik, S.I. Kulinich, R.I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, V.M. Vinokur // Физика низких температур. — 2007. — Т. 33, № 9. — С. 997–1001. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-120931
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1209312017-06-14T03:07:09Z Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures Gorelik, L.Y. Kulinich, S.I. Shekhter, R.I. Jonson, M. Vinokur, V.M. International Conference "Statistical Physics 2006. Condensed Matter: Theory and Application" We study transport of spin-polarized electrons through a magnetic single-electron transistor (SET) in the presence of an external magnetic field. Assuming the SET to have a nanometer-sized central island with a single electron level, we find that the zero-frequency shot noise diverges as the on-dot spin-flip rate goes to zero, provided the source and drain leads are completely polarized in the same direction. We present an analytical expression for the low-frequency super-poissonian shot noise that allows one to specify the necessary conditions for the experimental observation of the phenomenon. 2007 Article Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures / L.Y. Gorelik, S.I. Kulinich, R.I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, V.M. Vinokur // Физика низких температур. — 2007. — Т. 33, № 9. — С. 997–1001. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ. 0132-6414 PACS: 73.23.–b, 73.40.Gk http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/120931 en Физика низких температур Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
topic International Conference "Statistical Physics 2006. Condensed Matter: Theory and Application"
International Conference "Statistical Physics 2006. Condensed Matter: Theory and Application"
spellingShingle International Conference "Statistical Physics 2006. Condensed Matter: Theory and Application"
International Conference "Statistical Physics 2006. Condensed Matter: Theory and Application"
Gorelik, L.Y.
Kulinich, S.I.
Shekhter, R.I.
Jonson, M.
Vinokur, V.M.
Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures
Физика низких температур
description We study transport of spin-polarized electrons through a magnetic single-electron transistor (SET) in the presence of an external magnetic field. Assuming the SET to have a nanometer-sized central island with a single electron level, we find that the zero-frequency shot noise diverges as the on-dot spin-flip rate goes to zero, provided the source and drain leads are completely polarized in the same direction. We present an analytical expression for the low-frequency super-poissonian shot noise that allows one to specify the necessary conditions for the experimental observation of the phenomenon.
format Article
author Gorelik, L.Y.
Kulinich, S.I.
Shekhter, R.I.
Jonson, M.
Vinokur, V.M.
author_facet Gorelik, L.Y.
Kulinich, S.I.
Shekhter, R.I.
Jonson, M.
Vinokur, V.M.
author_sort Gorelik, L.Y.
title Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures
title_short Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures
title_full Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures
title_fullStr Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures
title_full_unstemmed Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures
title_sort giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized set structures
publisher Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
publishDate 2007
topic_facet International Conference "Statistical Physics 2006. Condensed Matter: Theory and Application"
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/120931
citation_txt Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures / L.Y. Gorelik, S.I. Kulinich, R.I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, V.M. Vinokur // Физика низких температур. — 2007. — Т. 33, № 9. — С. 997–1001. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ.
series Физика низких температур
work_keys_str_mv AT gorelikly giantsuperpoissonianshotnoiseinspinpolarizedsetstructures
AT kulinichsi giantsuperpoissonianshotnoiseinspinpolarizedsetstructures
AT shekhterri giantsuperpoissonianshotnoiseinspinpolarizedsetstructures
AT jonsonm giantsuperpoissonianshotnoiseinspinpolarizedsetstructures
AT vinokurvm giantsuperpoissonianshotnoiseinspinpolarizedsetstructures
first_indexed 2025-07-08T18:53:13Z
last_indexed 2025-07-08T18:53:13Z
_version_ 1837105986347728896
fulltext Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2007, v. 33, No. 9, p. 997–1001 Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures L.Y. Gorelik 1 , S.I. Kulinich 2,3 , R.I. Shekhter 2 , M. Jonson 2 , and V.M. Vinokur 4 1 Department of Applied Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 G�teborg, Sweden E-mail: gorelik@fy.chalmers.se 2 Department of Physics, G�teborg University, SE-412 96 G�teborg, Sweden 3 B.I. Verkin Institute for Low Temperature Physics and Engineering, 47 Lenin Ave., 61103 Kharkov, Ukraine 4 Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Av, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA Received January 15, 2007 We study transport of spin-polarized electrons through a magnetic single-electron transistor (SET) in the presence of an external magnetic field. Assuming the SET to have a nanometer-sized central island with a single electron level, we find that the zero-frequency shot noise diverges as the on-dot spin-flip rate goes to zero, provided the source and drain leads are completely polarized in the same direction. We present an ana- lytical expression for the low-frequency super-poissonian shot noise that allows one to specify the necessary conditions for the experimental observation of the phenomenon. PACS: 73.23.–b Electronic transport in mesoscopic systems; 73.40.Gk Tunneling (for tunneling in quantum Hall effects). Keywords: single-electron transistor, spin-flip time, shot-noise, Coulumb blockade, spin-polarized electrons. Confinement of electrons to a quantum of dot nanometer size crucially reduces the spin relaxation frequency [1] and allows for the implementation of various schemes where quantum information is carried by the spin of electrons [2–5]. Experimental evidence that the spin-flip time in quantum dots can reach the millisecond range has recently been obtained* [6,8]. Such long spin relaxation times is obviously an impor- tant prerequisite for spintronics-based quantum information processing. At the same time, the advantage coming from the extremely weak spin relaxation might obviously be an obsta- cle for its experimental study, demanding measurements of extremely high accuracy and sensitivity [6]. This is why any phenomenon that is exceedingly sensitive exclusively to spin relaxation should be of considerable practical importance. The Zeeman splitting of energy levels is the phenomenon tra- ditionally invoked to discriminate between contributions from different electronic spin-states to observable physical properties. Today, a number of different methods are used to create nonequilibrium spin populations and to study how they relax towards equilibrium. Transport measurements, which usually provide an excellent tool for such studies, are limited when it comes to observing very weak spin relaxation by the necessity to measure the extremely small electrical currents that result from the electrons being trapped for long times on the dot [6]. A large sensitivity to slow spin relaxation rates therefore requires a careful choice of observable. Recently, numerical simulations have revealed that shot noise in sin- gle-electron transistor (SET) structures, which significantly increases with the spin polarization of the tunneling electrons [7,9], could be such an observable. In this paper we present an analytical study of this phenomenon where we show that spin-dependent tunneling in combination with the Coulomb © L.Y. Gorelik, S.I. Kulinich, R.I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, and V.M. Vinokur, 2007 * The effect of intradot spin-flip scattering on shot noise was recently studied in Ref. 7. An increased shot-noise was reported for tunneling of polarized electrons. However, this effect was analyzed only numerically, which does not allow the results to be used as a tool for spectroscopy. blockade phenomenon in SETs results in shot noise charac- terized by a giant super-poissonian Fano factor at low fre- quencies. Consequently low frequency noise measurements provides a tool for detecting slow spin flip rates in a quantum dot. Below we will study the transport of spin polarized electrons through a quantum using dot the SET geometry represented in Fig. 1. Two magnetic leads, biased by a voltage V serve as source and drain for the spin polarized electrons, while two electronic states with different spin orientation are available on the dot. An external magnetic field oriented perpendicular to the magnetization of the leads (which we assume are parallel) induces coherent spin-flip processes on the dot. To study the electronic transport through this system we will use the Hamiltonian ��, where � � � � � ,� � � � �� � � �l d T env (1) and � ,, , , , , , † , ,�l a a� ��� � � � � � � � � � � � � † † † † , ' , , ' '�d i i i a a U a a a a H a a� � �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � 2 , �T T a a� �� � � � � � � � � , , , , †( )H.c. . (2) Here ��l describes noninteracting electrons in the leads and a a� � � � � �, , † , ,( ) is the creation (annihilation) operator for electrons in lead � � ( , )L R with energy �� � �, , and spin projection � � ( , ). The electron density of states � � in each lead is assumed to be independent of energy but strongly dependent on spin direction. The electrons in each lead are held at a constant electrochemical potential �L R FE eV/, � � 2, where e is the charge of an electron, V � 0 is the bias voltage, and EF is the Fermi energy of the ferromagnetic metal. The Hamiltonian ��d describes elec- tronic states in the dot and their coupling to the external magnetic field H � ( , , )H Hx z0 ; � is the Bohr magneton and intra-dot electron correlations are characterized by the Coulomb energy U ; the operator a a� � † ( ) creates (de- stroys) an electron with spin � and �� � i , ' are Pauli matrix elements (i x y z� , , ). The third term in (1) represents spin-conserving tunneling of electrons between dot and leads while the last term describes the interaction between dot-electrons and the magnetic environment. In this paper we will study the case when the bias volt- age V is much smaller than both the spacing between spa- tially quantized levels on the dot and the Coulomb energy U , but much larger than the Zeeman energy � ��H z (see Fig. 1,a). This means that only one electron may be accu- mulated on the dot. In addition, we will focus on the situa- tion when the electrons on the leads are almost com- pletely polarized in the same direction (for definiteness in the «up» direction): � � � �� � / � � �� � � � �� �/ 1 ( � �2 1 2� � � �� T ). The two phenomena of electron spin-polarization in the leads and Coulomb blockade of double electron occupancy on the dot determine the current that flows through the system. To understand qualitatively the peculiarities of electronic transport in this situation we consider the limi- ting case when the electrons are completely polarized (� �L R� � 0). In this case a transition of the spin of the dot electron from «up» to «down» traps the electron on the dot, and prevents a current to flow through the system (since the Coulomb blockade prevents another, spin-up, electron to enter the dot). This is why the temporal variation of the current strictly follows the switching of electronic spin, al- lowing for such events to be counted. A schematic picture of the current fluctuations �I I I( ) ( )t t� – , where I is the av- erage value of the current, is shown in Fig. 1,b. It is impor- tant that the current-current correlation function S( )0 � � � �� ��dt t� �� �I I( ) (0) , where �� ��� denotes a statistical aver- age, serves as a measure of the time � during which the electron is trapped on the dot in the spin-down state — the state that prevents a current to flow through the system. Two possible channels for the escape of the electron from this state should be identified: a) a stochastic spin-flip pro- cess caused by the interaction with the environment and characterized by the spin relaxation time � �rel � � 1 1 and b) a magnetic-field induced coherent transition to the spin-up 998 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2007, v. 33, No. 9 L.Y. Gorelik, S.I. Kulinich, R.I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, and V.M. Vinokur + Hx a �L �R �L �R I(t) t b I �� 0 �L �R Fig. 1. a — Sketch of the nano-magnetic SET device discussed in the text: a quantum dot, modelled as a single spin-degenerate electron level, is coupled to two leads with parallel magnetiza- tion. The tunneling rates � L R( ) ( ) describe the coupling between and dot electrodes, while the external magnetic field Hx induces flips between the spin-up and the spin-down state on the dot. The difference � �L R eV� � in electrochemical potential of the leads is due to a bias voltage V . b — Schematic picture of the current fluctuations in the case when the leads are completely polarized in the same direction (I is the average current). s t a t e . T h e l a t t e r i s c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y t h e r a t e �H xH / /� ( ) ( )2 2� � �, w h e r e � ( ) ( )� �� �2 / � � � �Im ( )2 1� � �i R is the density of spin-up states on the dot. Therefore � � � � �( )1 1 H and S( )0 may be estimated as S H( ) ( )0 1 1� � �� . If H x = 0 we have H � 0 and one can see from the above expression that the zero-frequency shot noise is a diver- gent function of the spin relaxation rate reaching giant values for slow enough relaxation. Below we will show that the average current, on the other hand, does not at all depend on the external magnetic field and the internal spin relaxation rate if � � � � 0. Hence a simultaneous measurement of both the current and the noise for oppo- site polarities of the bias voltage allows one to deduce the value of the spin-flip rate. In order to quantitatively investigate the current and shot noise in the SET structure described above one can use the quantum master equation for the reduced density matrix � ( ) �( )� �r lt t� Tr that describes the state of the dot ( �� is the total density matrix and Trl denotes a trace over all electronic states in the leads). The operator � ( )�r t acts on the Fock space of the quantum dot, which in the Coulomb blockade regime is spanned by the three basis vectors | ,0� | | , | | † † � � � � � � a a0 0 . In this ba- sis � ( )�r t is a 3 3� matrix. The diagonal element � �0 0| � ( )|�r t represents the probability for the dot to be unoccupied, the singly occupied dot is described by the 2 2� matrix block � ( � ) | � | ', '� � � � �� �� � � �r r , while nondiagonal elements � �� �| � |r 0 equal zero. The time evolution of the probability � and the density matrix �� is determined by a system of equations that de- scribe the coupled processes of stochastic charge transfer and coherent spin dynamics [10] (below we will take e � �� 1), � � � � � � � } � �} � � � t L RTr{ Tr{� � , � � � � � �� !" � � � � � � , � � � , � {� � � � � � � �# �� t i Hz x x L R � � $� 2 1 2 � }, (3) where � ( ) � ( )� � � � �� � � � � �� � � � I/ /z2 2. The linear operator �� �{�} describes the spin relaxation in a singly occupied dot caused by interaction with the environment. In the general case it can be written in the form �� � � � � � % � � � � �{�} � [ � � ) �] � � )�� � � � & �1 2z z i i z iTr ( Tr Tr ( . (4) Here �1 and � 2 are, respectively, the spin relaxation rate and the spin dephasing rate, while the coefficient % � � tanh( ) (' '�/2 is the inverse temperature) characterizes the difference in the populations of spin-up and spin- down states if the system is in equilibrium with the envi- ronment. Here we will consider the case when the thermal energy is much higher than the Zeeman splitting (but lower than the bias voltage) and take % � 0. The spin relax- ation rate �1 defines the rate of direct spin-flip transitions induced by the environment and as a result has a first-hand influence on the low-frequency shot noise. In contrast, the dephasing rate � 2, which controls the decay of nondiagonal elements of the reduced density matrix, affects spin-flip processes only indirectly. As we will see below, it only renormalizes the effect of the external mag- netic field. Within our approach the average current, I I� �� �� �� � i H N R[ � , � ], where �N R is the electron number operator in the right lead, can be calculated from the formula [10] I R� Tr { � � },� �0 (5) where ( , � )� �0 0 represent the stationary solution of Eq. (3). In our further considerations we will use the for- malism developed in Ref. 11. Following this approach it is convenient to rewrite Eqs. (5) in the form � � � � � | | ( ( t L , (6) w h e r e t h e c o l u m n v e c t o r |(� i s g i v e n b y |(� � � � � ( , , , , ) |� � � � � (T T , while the matrix L is determined by Eqs. (3). In this notation the formula for the average current, Eq. (5), takes the form I T� � �( (0 0| |J , (7) were |( 0� obeys equation L| .( 0 0� � . (8) By this means the elements of the steady-state density ma- trix, the vector | ( , , , , )( 0 1 1 1 0 0T T� � , satisfy the equation L T T|( 0 0� � , and J is a «current» matrix that has only two nonzero elements � , �J JR R12 13� � � � . We solved Eq. (8) and found the following expression for the average cur- rent when �� �� 1: I I h h OR R L R � � � � � � � � ) * + + , - . .0 2 1 2 1 � � � / � � � �� ~ ( ) ~ ( ) . (9) Here ~ ,� � /1 1 0� � / IR R� � and I h H H H / L R L R x x R 0 2 0 2 2 22 2 � � � ) * ++ , - .. � � � � � � � � , ( ) ( � � 2 2 2� ) . Analyzing the above expression one finds that in the ab- sence of spin-flip processes ( , )H x � �0 01� the current vanishes if �R 0 0 . Indeed, under such conditions the electron can not leave the spin-down state and the current is blocked forever. Then, from (9) it follows that with identical leads ( )� � �L R� � the current is equal to I O0 � ( )� and does not depend (to leading order in � on the Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2007, v. 33, No. 9 999 magnetic field, relaxation rates or Zeeman splitting. Be- low we will study the shot noise for this very case. The noise power spectrum is defined as twice the Fou- rier transform of the current-current correlation function (see Ref. 12 for a review): S dt i t( )1 1� �2 e [ �( ) � ]�� �� �I t I I(0) 2 . (10) Within our formalism the correlation function �� ��� �I I(t) (0) can be expressed in the form [11] �� �� � � � � ��( ) �( ) ( ) ( ) | |I t I t t tT0 0 0I ( )� 2 ( (JP J � � � �2 ( (( ) | (– ) |t tT 0 0JP J , (11) where P L( )t t� exp is an evolution operator. The first term on the right hand side of Eq. (11) is the self-correla- tion term. Using Eqs. (10) and (11) one can rewrite the formula for the shot noise in terms of the eigenvalues 3 i of the matrices L L, T and their associated eigenvectors | ,3 i � |3 i T �. Taking into account that the eigenvalue, 3 0 say, that corresponds to the steady-state solution of Eq. (8), is zero (accordingly | | , | | )3 ( 3 (0 0 0 0� � � � � �T T , we get S I Ti ii i( ) ( , )1 3 1 3 3 3� � �& �2 4 2 2 0 0 , T i i i i i ( , ) | | | | | 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 30 0 0� � � � � � � J J . (12) The eigenvalues 3 i are given by zeros of the characteris- tic polynomial P P( ) | | ( )3 3 3 3� �Det | L – I | 0 . We have found that in the general case (with arbitrary values of the parameters � �, ,i xH and � ) the polynomial P0( )3 has the form P R0 2 2 22( ) [( ) ]3 3 �� � � � �� � � � � � � �[ ( ) ]3 3 �2 12 � �L R D � � � � �4 2 22 1( ) ( ) ( )� 3 � 3H x R L R� � � , (13) where D L R R� � � � ( ) ( )2 1 1� � �� � �� and �� � �� � �( )1 2/ . From the above expression it follows that one of the roots of the characteristic polynomial 31 vanishes like 3 � �1 2 1�� � � A hR� ( ~ ) (14) if � �, 1 and H x go to zero; A /L R L R� � � 4 ( ) ( ) ( , )2 12� � � � is a dimensionless coefficient of order one. As a consequence, the correlation function S( )0 may according to Eq. (12) diverge and exhibit a giant super- poissonian behavior for small values of these parameters. By calculating the «transition» coefficient T ( , )3 30 1 , in the case of strongly polarized leads ( )� �� 1 and small spin-flip frequency �sf R Rh� � �� � �2 1 (15) we get (to leading order) the following expression for the low-frequency Fano factor F S / I( ) ( )1 1� 2 * F A A R sf R sf R ( ) ( ) 1 / � 1 � � 2 2 2 2 2 2 � � � � � � . (16) Equation (16), together with (9) and (15), is the main result of our considerations. First, from these equations it follows that the spin dephasing rate � 2, in contrast to the spin relaxation rate �1, only influences the contribution of the transverse magnetic field to the spin-flip process, and that its effect, according to Eq. (9), is strongly restricted by the condition 4 1� 5 �R . Then from (16) one can see that the zero-frequency shot noise diverges as 1/ sf dem- onstrating a high sensitivity to the intensity of spin-flip processes, if the leads are completely polarized ( )� � 0 . If the polarization of the leads is not complete, the spin-flip processes significantly affect the shot noise only if the spin-flip frequency sf is not much smaller than the «mi- nority» tunneling rate �R : � �R x RH /H � �( )0 2 1� � . This brings an important restriction on the use of shot noise measurements as a tool for probing spin-flip pro- cesses. Indeed, from the above inequality it follows that in order to increase the sensitivity of shot noise to spin flips (in particular to the spin relaxation rate �1) one has to diminish either � (by increasing the polarization in the leads) or the «majority» tunneling rate �R . However, the latter alternative is not preferable, since it decreases the value of the current. If there is no transverse magnetic field the spin-flip frequency coincides with the spin-relaxation rate �1. For this case we have obtained the following expression for F( )1 : F D ( )1 � 1 � 1 � 1 � � � � � 1 1 2 2 4 3 2 2 , (17) 1000 Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2007, v. 33, No. 9 L.Y. Gorelik, S.I. Kulinich, R.I. Shekhter, M. Jonson, and V.M. Vinokur * Equation (9) shows that the average current does not depend (in leading order) on the spin-flip rate sf if the leads are strongly polarized. Hence the low-frequency Fano factor completely characterizes the behavior of the low-frequency shot noise. where �1 2� � ( )� � � �L R L R , � � � �2 1 18 2� � � � � � � � � � �L L R R R R D( ) ( ) , � �3 1 24 2� � � �( )� �L R D , which is valid for any values of 1 � �, � , and �1. One can easily check that this expression is in agreement with Eq. (16). From Eq. (17), as well from Eq. (16), it follows that the zero-frequency Fano factor diverges as 1 1/ � when the relaxation rate goes to zero if �, H x � 0, i.e., if the leads are completely polarized and the transverse magnetic field is zero. On the other hand, if the leads are fully po- larized and spin-flip processes are absent ( )�1 0� , the Fano factor F( )0 should coincide with the one that has been calculated for spinless electrons [11]. The correct value of the shot noise at zero frequency may be obtained from Eq. (17) if one takes the appropriate limits in the correct order, so that F F( , ) lim lim ( , )1 � 1 � 1 � � � � 0 0 0 01 0 0 1 1 . To understand this ordering one has to take into account that an infinite time is needed to measure zero-frequency noise, while in a real experimental situation the frequency under consideration can not be smaller than the inverse observation time. We have also calculated the zero-frequency shot noise in the limit of a strong transverse magnetic field, (H x 2 1�� . It turns out that only one term in the sum (12) gives a nonvanishing contribution to the shot-noise in this limit; the corresponding root of the characteristic poly- nomial (13) has the asymptotic value 3 h � � � �( ) ( )2 1 2� �L R xO / H( . Calculating the «transition» coefficient T h( , )3 30 we ob- tained the following expression for the zero-frequency Fano factor: F L R L R ( ) ( ) 0 1 4 2 2 � � � � � � � . (18) From this expression one can see that in the limit of a strong magnetic field the zero-frequency shot noise, like the average current, does not depend on the spin-flip rate, in particular not the rate due to the magnetic field. In conclusion, we have studied transport of spin-polar- ized electrons through a magnetic SET in the presence of an external magnetic field. Assuming the SET to have a nanometer-sized central island with a single-electron level we found that the zero-frequency shot noise di- verges as the rate for spin-flips on the goes dot to zero if leads are completely polarized in the same direction. We presented an analytical expression for the low-frequency super-poissonian shot noise and discussed the conditions required for the experimental observation of such an en- hancement of the low-frequency noise. This work was supported in part by the European Commission through project FP6-003673 CANEL of the IST Priority. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the offi- cial European Commission’s view on the subject. Finan- cial support from the Swedish SSF, the Swedish VR, and from the U.S. DOE Office of Science through contract No. W-31-109-ENG-38 is also gratefully acknowledged. 1. V. Khaetskii and Yu.V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B61, 12639 (2000). 2. D.D. Awschalom, D. Loss, and N. Samarth, Semiconductor Spintronics and Quantum Computation, Springer, Berlin (2002). 3. I. Zutic, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004). 4. M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, New York (2000). 5. V. Cerletti, W.A. Coish, O. Gywat, and D. Loss, Nano- technology 16, R27 (2005). 6. R. Hanson, B. Witkamp, L.M. Vandersypen, L.H. Willems van Beveren, J.M. Elzerman, and L.P. Kouwenhoven, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 196802 (2003). 7. I. Djuric, B. Dong, and H.L. Cui, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 063710 (2006); Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 032195 (2005). 8. J.M. Elzerman, R. Hanson, L.H.W. van Beveren, B. Witkamp, L.M.K. Vandersypen, and L.P. Kouwenhoven, Nature (London) 430, 431 (2004). 9. Collosal Magnetoresistive Oxides, Y. Tokura (ed.), Gor- don and Breach, Amsterdam (2000). 10. L.Y. Gorelik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 116806 (2005). 11. Z. Hershfield, Phys. Rev. B47, 1967 (1993). 12. M.J.M. de Jong and C.W.J. Beenakker, in Mesoscopic Elec- tron Transport, L.L. Sohn, G. Sch�n, and L.P. Kouwenhoven (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (1997). Giant super-poissonian shot noise in spin-polarized SET structures Fizika Nizkikh Temperatur, 2007, v. 33, No. 9 1001