Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals

The radiation of short duration signals (or ultra-wideband – UWB signals) is significantly different from the long duration narrowband signals (see Table 1 below). Paper analyzed the processes in linear antennas and gives a physical interpretation these differences.

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2002
Автори: Immoreev, I.J., Sinyavin, A.N.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Радіоастрономічний інститут НАН України 2002
Назва видання:Радиофизика и радиоастрономия
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/122343
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals / I.J. Immoreev, A.N. Sinyavin // Радиофизика и радиоастрономия. — 2002. — Т. 7, № 4. — С. 389-393. — Бібліогр.: 3 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-122343
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1223432017-07-03T03:03:22Z Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals Immoreev, I.J. Sinyavin, A.N. The radiation of short duration signals (or ultra-wideband – UWB signals) is significantly different from the long duration narrowband signals (see Table 1 below). Paper analyzed the processes in linear antennas and gives a physical interpretation these differences. В статье анализируются процессы в линейных антеннах. Излучение сигналов короткой длительности (или сверхширокополосных) существенно отличается от излучения сигналов большой длительности (узкополосных). Приводится физическая интерпретация этих различий. У статті аналізуються процеси у лінійних антенах. Випромінювання сигналів короткої тривалості (або надширокосмугових) суттєво відрізняється від випромінювання сигналів з великою тривалістю (вузькосмугових). Наводиться фізична інтерпретація цих відмінностей. 2002 Article Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals / I.J. Immoreev, A.N. Sinyavin // Радиофизика и радиоастрономия. — 2002. — Т. 7, № 4. — С. 389-393. — Бібліогр.: 3 назв. — англ. 1027-9636 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/122343 en Радиофизика и радиоастрономия Радіоастрономічний інститут НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description The radiation of short duration signals (or ultra-wideband – UWB signals) is significantly different from the long duration narrowband signals (see Table 1 below). Paper analyzed the processes in linear antennas and gives a physical interpretation these differences.
format Article
author Immoreev, I.J.
Sinyavin, A.N.
spellingShingle Immoreev, I.J.
Sinyavin, A.N.
Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals
Радиофизика и радиоастрономия
author_facet Immoreev, I.J.
Sinyavin, A.N.
author_sort Immoreev, I.J.
title Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals
title_short Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals
title_full Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals
title_fullStr Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals
title_full_unstemmed Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals
title_sort radiation of ultra-wideband (uwb) signals
publisher Радіоастрономічний інститут НАН України
publishDate 2002
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/122343
citation_txt Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals / I.J. Immoreev, A.N. Sinyavin // Радиофизика и радиоастрономия. — 2002. — Т. 7, № 4. — С. 389-393. — Бібліогр.: 3 назв. — англ.
series Радиофизика и радиоастрономия
work_keys_str_mv AT immoreevij radiationofultrawidebanduwbsignals
AT sinyavinan radiationofultrawidebanduwbsignals
first_indexed 2025-07-08T21:32:48Z
last_indexed 2025-07-08T21:32:48Z
_version_ 1837116027783086080
fulltext Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy, 2002, v. 7, No. 4, pp. 389-393 RADIATION OF ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SIGNALS I.J. Immoreev, Senior Member IEEE, A.N. Sinyavin Moscow Aviation Institute Gospitalny val, Home 5, block 18, apt 314. 105094, Moscow, Russia, E-mail: immoreev@aha.ru, asinyavin@fm-craft.ru The radiation of short duration signals (or ultra-wideband – UWB signals) is significantly different from the long duration narrowband signals (see Table 1 below). Paper analyzed the processes in linear antennas and gives a physical interpretation these differences. 1. Introduction The building of ultra-wideband (UWB) radars re- quires a theoretical basis for calculating the antenna design parameters and predicting the performance. This is particularly important for designing antenna systems that set up the performance of precision range and the direction measuring systems. Recent publica- tions about UWB antennas do not present a compre- hensive and systematic theory for calculating such antenna parameters. This is because the UWB signal radiation process in antennas is significantly different from the narrow-band signal case. Studying these differences and determining the causes helps to de- velop the design calculation methods for the UWB antennas. In this paper, we analyzed the radiation pro- cess occurring in linear UWB antennas and gave a physical interpretation. Table 1. Signal Parameter Narrowband UWB Radiation All the aperture of antenna (one wave) Only the center and edges of antenna’s aper- ture (several waves) The form of a radiation field in time Derivative from form of current (signal) Repeats the form of a current (sig- nal) Amplitude of a radiation field Depends on an- gular coordi- nates only Depends on an- gular coordinates and time The form of a radiation field in space (an- tenna pattern) Depends on an- gular coordi- nates only Depends on an- gular coordi- nates, time and on form of cur- rent (signal) Side radiation Side lobes Uniform de- crease 2. The Processes in a UWB Antenna 2.1. A UWB Antenna Propagation Model We consider a series excited antenna modeled as one branch of a symmetrical radiator of length L , and having a large number of the elementary radiators of size L∆ . By examining the radiation from each ele- ment L∆ we can sum up the results and provide the far field estimate at different angles from the antenna axis. The result shows that the field is a function of time and the angular position from the antenna, in- stead of the position, as in the narrowband case. For the given radiator size L , the radiation becomes axial for small values of cτ . As τ has increased increases to a constant length, the pattern becomes normal to the antenna axis. Fig. 1 shows the l representing one branch of a symmetrical radiator with length L consisting of a large number of elementary radiators with the linear size L∆ . In Fig. 1 we use the following notation: jL∆ is the j -th elementary radiator, jL is its coor- dinate, r is the distance to observation point M ; Θ is the angle between the direction to observation point and the antenna axis. The pulse of current starts at point O which is the physical base of the antenna. 2.2. Derivation of the Equation We consider the electromagnetic far-field, appearing r M 0 θ jL L∆ L-L Fig. 1. The symmetrical radiator model for the analysis I.J. Immoreev, A.N. Sinyavin 390 Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy, 2002, v. 7, No. 4 as the pulse of current spreads along the radiator branch. The current pulse feeding to point O excites the first elementary radiator. The electromagnetic field appearing in the far field at time /r c has the following form: ( ) 0 1 1 0 , sin 1 cos , 4 E t Z d L r Li t L c r dt c c θ θ θ π =   −  − − ∆      where 0Z is the free space impedance; 0c is the ve- locity of propagation of the current pulse in the radia- tor. To simplify calculations hereinafter we assume: 0c c= . In time /L c∆ the pulse of current enter the second elementary radiator and excite it. The second electromagnetic field is as in the equation as 1L is changed to 2L . As the current pulse moves along the branch it sequentially excites each elementary radiator. To get a clear physical knowledge we ignore the resistance and radiation losses and assume that the load absorbs the current pulse after exciting the last, or N -th radiator. The far field after the excitation of all the elementary radiators is as: 0 1 ( , ) cossin , 4 N j j j E t L r LZ d i t L cr dt c c θ θθ π Σ = = −   − − ∆     ∑ Now we can examine the continuous antenna. For this purpose we consider the length of the elemen- tary radiator tending to zero 0L∆ → and the num- ber of elementary radiators tending to infinity N → ∞ . Then, in our equation the summation can be changed to integration so that ( )0 0 ( , ) sin cos . 4 L E t Z d L r Li t dL cr dt c c θ θ θ π Σ = − − −   ∫ This equation describes the electric component of the electromagnetic far field for symmetrical radiator branch excited by arbitrary current. The field is determined by the derivative of cur- rent with respect to time and is formed by various points of the radiator as the pulse moves along the wire. In round brackets there is the expression which determines the current time of the system in view of this delay. We take the derivative of this time with respect to dL , and have the opportunity to introduce the replacement variable: cos 1dt dL c θ −= . As a result we obtain the receive integral from the deriva- tive function of the same variable, which is equal to this function. Then: ( ) ( ) ( ) 0 0 0 ( , ) sin 1 cos 4 cos 1 sin 1 cos 4 cos 1 . L E t Z L r Li tr c c Z L r Li t r c c ri t c θ θ θ π θ θ θ π θ Σ = − =− −− − − − −−  −     It is seen from this equation that the radiation of the symmetrical radiator branch in far field is a sum of two fields. One of which is radiated when the current pulse enters the point of radiator excitation, and the other at the moment when this pulse achieves the end of the radiator. In literature this process is often ex- plained as the radiation from the excitation point and from the end of radiator. However, this interpretation is not correct. Let us consider the example: the field created by radiator branch in the case when the exciting current pulse has the Gaussian form shown by the solid line in Fig. 2, and is expressed by ( ) ( )2exp 4 ti t τ = −   , where τ is the duration of pulse on level 0,5. This pulse creates the elementary radiator far field determined by its derivative. The result is the symmetrical bipolar pulse shown by the dotted line in Fig. 2. Having substituted equations and performing differentiation and integration, we obtain: ( ) ( ) } 0 2 2 sin 1, 4 cos 1 cos exp 4 exp 4 . ZE t r L r Lt c c rt c θθ π θ θ τ τ Σ = × −   −     − −     − −         − −   dt tdI )( t )(tI ),(tI dttdI /)( Fig. 2. Gaussian pulse and its derivative Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy, 2002, v. 7, No. 4 391 2.3. The Fields and Antenna Patterns during Radiation of a UWB Signal We examine the far field formation for the case where the branch length L greatly exceeds the pulse dura- tion in the space cτ . In Fig. 3 the fields exited by elementary radiators jL in point M at the angle 90θ = ° are shown with continuous line. These fields have the double polarity and time delay relative to each other. The far field result, at any angle and distance, is compensated by the addition or subtraction of the fields from different points along the radiator. There is the full compensa- tion of the fields in the time interval t τ= and /t L c τ= − . However, some part of the fields ex- cited by the pulse of current at the initial and terminal areas of the radiator branch remain uncompensated. The sum of these remaining fields is shown in Fig. 3 with dotted lines. As a result the field created by the radiator branch under L cτ consists of two parts, as if they were connected with the point of excitation and with the end of this branch. This figure explains the apparently contradictory shape of the radiated short pulse because the field waveform follows the current instead of its derivative. The degree of interaction and compensation be- tween the elementary radiator fields depends on the antenna length and pulse duration. If the pulse dura- tion τ increases and the antenna length L remains constant, then the time interval on which the compen- sation of the fields occurs will become less. Finally, under L cτ the compensation practically stops, as shown in Fig. 4. The antenna radiates with the whole aperture simultaneously. With variations of the observation angle θ , the distances from the observation point to each elemen- tary radiator jL vary. As a result, the summation of far-fields for these radiators occurs in various ways and the form of the resulting field created by the ra- diator branch varies as shown in Fig. 5. Thus, if angle θ is reduced the amplitude of this field increases. This occurs because more of the elementary radiator fields do not fall into the compensation areas. The field amplitude increases until it is influenced by the multiplier sin θ , which defines the pattern of the ele- mentary radiator. Note the radiation waveform changes with the angle from the antenna. Let us consider the pattern of the radiator branch. For this, we use the above equations. Thus, the con- sidered antenna pattern is non-stationary and depends on the time of the current pulse in the antenna. This pattern can be presented as a family of instant pat- )90,( °=Σ θtE )(1 tE )(2 tE )(tEN t )(tE c r c L c r + Fig. 3. Fields excited by radiator branch when L cτ )90,( °=Σ θtE )(1 tE )(2 tE )(tEN t )(tE c r c L c r + Fig. 4. The fields excited by the radiator branch when L cτ )(tE t 1t 2t 3t 7t0t 4t 5t 6t °= 90θ °= 75θ °= 60θ °= 45θ °= 10θ °= 15θ °= 30θ Fig. 5. Variations of the summation field in the far zone for different angles 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 d E t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 tmax t0< t1<...< t5< tmax Fig. 6. UWB radiator instantaneous field patterns for Gaussian pulse excitation I.J. Immoreev, A.N. Sinyavin 392 Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy, 2002, v. 7, No. 4 terns, each of which corresponds to the instantaneous far field for some given waveform. Fig. 6 shows the family of instant patterns in the field ( )E θ for the Gaussian pulse exciting the radia- tor branch when the radiator length exceeds the signal spatial duration so that L cτ . As it can be seen from Fig. 6, the pattern maximum changes its direc- tion during the time of the radiated field existence. At initial time this maximum is directed practically along the antenna axis. As the current pulse moves, the pat- tern shifts toward the antenna normal. The space pat- tern width and maximum value decrease as the pattern moves away from the axis. The field pattern of time varying nature is diffi- cult to use. We can determine a static pattern by aver- aging the radiator far field over the time of its exis- tence. Such pattern is called the energy pattern ( )W θ . The family of such patterns for different rela- tionships between the length of radiator branch L and the pulse duration in space cτ is shown in Fig. 7. The expressions for the energy pattern of a wire antenna are also given in Malek G.M. Hussain, Matthew J. Yedlin [2] for various values /L cτ . When L cτ< , this pattern coincides with the radiator branch pattern. If τ is reduced and L is held con- stant, the pattern shifts from normal position to the antenna and grows narrower. At values of L cτ , radiation becomes axial, as if the impulse source radi- ates directly into free space with no compensation from the antenna length. The series excited antenna was considered above. We can obtain similar results for the parallel antenna excitation. For this purpose it is necessary to exclude from the equations term /L c determining delay of a current’s pulse in the aperture. Fig. 8 and 9 show the instantaneous field patterns and energy pat- terns for the Gaussian pulse excitation of UWB radia- tor in this case. 3. Conclusion In the conventional antenna theory, the radiated en- ergy duplicates the exciting signal frequency and waveform. By examining the impulse radiator case, we find that the length of the antenna and the radia- tion direction with respect to the antenna axis produce different waveforms. Analyzing and predicting UWB signal radiation require a new approach to considering how electronic impulses interact and compensate in the far field. This paper suggests that if antenna length L cτ , there will be a continuously varying signal spectrum in off-axis directions. This could provide a method for the direction finding with respect to the antenna axis based on the signal waveform. References 1. I.J. Immoreev. “Ultra-Wideband Radar: new opportu- nities, unusual problems, system features,” Proceeding of Moscow State Technical University, №4, pp. 25-26, December,1998. 2. I.J. Immoreev. “Main Features of UWB Radars and Differences from Common Narrowband Radars.” In book «Ultrawideband Radar Technology», Edited by James D. Taylor, CRC Press, Boca Raton, London, New Work, Washington, 2000. 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 degrees L cτ =0.01 0.51550 W Wmax 1 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 Fig. 7. Family of the simple radiator field patterns for different ratios of L to cτ -60 -15 -30 -15 0 15 30 45 d E 60 t1 t0 t2 t3 t4 t4< t3< t2< t1< t0 Fig. 8. The UWB radiator instantaneous field pat- terns for the Gaussian pulse and parallel antenna excitation 0 45 90 135 degrees L cτ =5 10 20 30 40 W Wmax 1 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 180 Fig. 9. Family of the simple radiator field patterns for different ratios of L to cτ for parallel antenna excitation Radiation of Ultra-Wideband (UWB) Signals Radio Physics and Radio Astronomy, 2002, v. 7, No. 4 393 3. Malek G.M. Hussain, Matthew J. Yedlin. “Active Ar- ray Bearnforming for Ultra-Wideband Impulse Radar,” IEEE International Radar Conference RADAR 2000, Alexandria, USA, May 8-12, 2000. ИЗЛУЧЕНИЕ СВЕРХШИРОКОПОЛОСНЫХ СИГНАЛОВ И.Я. Иммореев, А.Н. Синявин В статье анализируются процессы в линейных ан- теннах. Излучение сигналов короткой длительности (или сверхширокополосных) существенно отличается от излучения сигналов большой длительности (узкопо- лосных). Приводится физическая интерпретация этих различий. ВИПРОМІНЮВАННЯ НАДШИРОКОСМУГОВИХ СИГНАЛІВ І.Я. Імморєєв, А.М. Синявін У статті аналізуються процеси у лінійних антенах. Випромінювання сигналів короткої тривалості (або над- широкосмугових) суттєво відрізняється від випроміню- вання сигналів з великою тривалістю (вузькосмугових). Наводиться фізична інтерпретація цих відмінностей.