Coarse rays

We give some characterizations of geodesic metric spaces coarsely equivalent to the ray R⁺.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2008
Hauptverfasser: Kuchaiev, O., Protasov, I.V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України 2008
Schriftenreihe:Український математичний вісник
Online Zugang:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/124335
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Coarse rays / O. Kuchaiev, I.V. Protasov // Український математичний вісник. — 2008. — Т. 5, № 2. — С. 185-192. — Бібліогр.: 5 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-124335
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1243352017-09-24T03:03:37Z Coarse rays Kuchaiev, O. Protasov, I.V. We give some characterizations of geodesic metric spaces coarsely equivalent to the ray R⁺. 2008 Article Coarse rays / O. Kuchaiev, I.V. Protasov // Український математичний вісник. — 2008. — Т. 5, № 2. — С. 185-192. — Бібліогр.: 5 назв. — англ. 1810-3200 2000 MSC. 54C99, 54F15, 05C10 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/124335 en Український математичний вісник Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description We give some characterizations of geodesic metric spaces coarsely equivalent to the ray R⁺.
format Article
author Kuchaiev, O.
Protasov, I.V.
spellingShingle Kuchaiev, O.
Protasov, I.V.
Coarse rays
Український математичний вісник
author_facet Kuchaiev, O.
Protasov, I.V.
author_sort Kuchaiev, O.
title Coarse rays
title_short Coarse rays
title_full Coarse rays
title_fullStr Coarse rays
title_full_unstemmed Coarse rays
title_sort coarse rays
publisher Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
publishDate 2008
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/124335
citation_txt Coarse rays / O. Kuchaiev, I.V. Protasov // Український математичний вісник. — 2008. — Т. 5, № 2. — С. 185-192. — Бібліогр.: 5 назв. — англ.
series Український математичний вісник
work_keys_str_mv AT kuchaievo coarserays
AT protasoviv coarserays
first_indexed 2025-07-09T01:16:49Z
last_indexed 2025-07-09T01:16:49Z
_version_ 1837130122032840704
fulltext Український математичний вiсник Том 5 (2008), № 2, 185 – 192 Coarse rays O. Kuchaiev, Igor V. Protasov Abstract. We give some characterizations of geodesic metric spaces coarsely equivalent to the ray R +. 2000 MSC. 54C99, 54F15, 05C10. Key words and phrases. Coarse equivalence, coarse ray, geodesic ray, almost geodesic ray. Let (X, d), (Y, ρ) be metric spaces. A mapping f : X → Y is called a coarse embedding if, for every r > 0, there exists s > 0 such that, for all x1, x2 ∈ X, d(x1, x2) ≤ r =⇒ ρ(f(x1), f(x2)) ≤ s, ρ(f(x1), f(x2)) ≤ r =⇒ d(x1, x2) ≤ s. The metric spaces (X, d), (Y, ρ) are called coarsely equivalent if there exists a coarse embedding f : X → Y such that f(X) is large in Y , i.e. there exists t > 0 such that, for every y ∈ Y , there is z ∈ f(X) such that ρ(y, z) ≤ t. The space R + = {r ∈ R : r ≥ 0} endowed with the Euclidian metric is called the ray. By a coarse ray we mean any metric space coarsely equivalent to ray. For motivation of study metric spaces from the “coarse” point of view see [3, 5, 9, 10]. As is the segment [0, 1] in topology, the ray is one of the simplest non-trivial objects in coarse geometry, so it is natural to ask for its characterization up to coarse equivalence. There is a simple test [5, Proposition 2.57] to recognize whether a given metric space is coarsely equivalent to some geodesic metric space. Thus, to answer this question we can work with only geodesic metric spaces. Theorem 1 and 3 provide several characterizations; Theorem 2 gives a better characterization in Received 28.12.2008 ISSN 1810 – 3200. c© Iнститут математики НАН України 186 Coarse rays case of proper metric spaces; Example 2 shows that Theorem 2 does not hold for non-proper metric spaces. By Theorem 1, every geodesic metric space coarsely emenddable in the ray is a coarse ray. Clearly, it is not true outside of the geodesic case. Using the anti-Cantor set and Theorem 3.11 from [2], in Theorem 4 we describe the ultrametric spaces coarsely embeddable to the ray. Let (X, d) be a metric space. We fix some point x0 ∈ X and define a preordering ≤ on X by the rule: x ≤ y if and only if d(x0, x) ≤ d(x0, y). For ε ≥ 0, a space (X, d) is said to be ε-directed (with respect to the base point x0) if, for any x, y ∈ X, x ≤ y, we have d(x0, x) + d(x, y) ≤ d(x0, y) + ε. If (X, d) is ε-directed then, for every x′ ∈ X there exists ε′ ≥ 0 such that (X, d) is ε′-directed with respect to x′. Lemma 1. Every ε-directed space is coarsely emenddable in the ray. Proof. Let (X, d) be ε-directed with respect to x0. We define a mapping f : X → R + by the rule f(x) = d(x0, x), and note that, for any x, y ∈ X with x ≤ y, we have d(x, y) − ε ≤ f(y) − f(x) ≤ d(x, y), so f is a coarse embedding. By Theorem 1, the converse statement is true for every geodesic metric space (X, d), but in general case it does not hold. Example 1. Let (X, d) be a half-parabola {(x, y) ∈ R + × R + : y = x2} with the metric d inherited from the plane. It is easy to see that the mapping f : (X, d) → R +, f(x, y) = y is a coarse embedding. On the other hand, (X, d) is not ε-directed for every ε ≥ 0. A subset Y of a metric space (X, d) is called bounded if there exists C > 0 such that diam Y ≤ C where diam Y = sup{d(x, y) : x, y ∈ X}. A family ℑ of subsets of a metric space (X, d) is called uniformly bounded if there exists C > 0 such that diam F ≤ C for every F ∈ ℑ. Given a metric space (X, d) and any x ∈ X, r ∈ R +, we put B(x, r) = {y ∈ X : d(x, y) ≤ r}, S(x, r) = {y ∈ X : d(x, y) = r} O. Kuchaiev, I. V. Protasov 187 Lemma 2. If (X, d) is an ε-directed space with the base point x0 then the family {S(x0, r) : r ∈ R +} is uniformly bounded. Proof. Let x, y ∈ X, d(x0, x) = d(x0, y) and x ≤ y. Since d(x0, x) + d(x, y) ≤ d(x0, y)+ε, we have d(x, y) ≤ ε, so diam S(x0, r) ≤ ε for every r ∈ R +. By Theorem 1 the converse statement is true for every geodesic metric space. On the other hand, Example 1 shows that in general case it does not hold. Let (X, d), (Y, ρ) be metric spaces. Given λ > 0,c ≥ 0, a mapping f : X → Y is called a (λ, c)-isometric embedding if, for all x1, x2 ∈ X, λ−1d(x1, x2) − c ≤ ρ(f(x1), f(x2)) ≤ λd(x1, x2) + c. If in addition f(X) is large in Y , we say that f is a (λ, c)-isometry. The metric spaces (X, d), (Y, ρ) are called quasi-isometric if there exists a (λ, c)-isometry f : X → Y . Let (X, d) be a metric space, r ≥ 0, f : [0, r] → X be an isometric embedding. We say that f([0, r]) is a geodesic segment with the endpoints f(0), f(r). A metric space (X, d) is called geodesic if any two points of X can be joined by a geodesic segment. Lemma 3. If the geodesic metric spaces (X, d), (Y, ρ) are coarsely equiv- alent then (X, d), (Y, ρ) are quasi-isometric. Proof. Let f : X → Y be a coarse embedding such that f(X) is large in Y . By [1, Proposition 1.4] or [5, Lemma 1.10], there exist λ, c such that ρ(f(x), f(x ′ )) ≤ λd(x, x ′ ) + c for all x, x ′ ∈ X. Since f(X) is large in Y , there exists t > 0 such that, for every y ∈ Y , we can find y ′ ∈ f(X) with ρ(y, y ′ ) < t. We fix some points x, x ′ and some geodesic segment [f(x), f(x ′ )]. On this segment we choose the points y1, . . . , yn such that y1 = f(x), d(y1, y2) = · · · = d(yn−1, yn) = 1, ρ(yn, f(x ′ )) = ε, ε < 1, so ρ(f(x), f(x ′ )) = n+ε. Then we pick the points x2, . . . , xn ∈ X so that ρ(f(x2), y2) < t, . . . , ρ(f(xn), yn) < t. We put s = 2t + 1, and choose r > 0 such that ρ(f(a), f(b)) ≤ s implies d(a, b) ≤ r for all a, b ∈ X. Then d(x, x1) ≤ d(x, x2) + d(x2, x3) + . . . + d(xn−1, xn) + d(xn, x ′ ) ≤ (n + 1)r = (n + ε)r + r(1 − ε) = rρ(f(x), f(x ′ )) + r(1 − ε). 188 Coarse rays Since the choice of r does not depend on x, x ′ , in view of the first para- graph, we conclude that f is a quasi-isometry. Theorem 1. For an unbounded geodesic metric space (X, d), x0 ∈ X, the following statements are equivalent: • (i) (X, d) is a coarse ray; • (ii) (X, d) is coarsely emenddable in the ray; • (iii) (X, d) is ε-directed; • (iv) the family {S(x0, r) : r ∈ R +} is uniformly bounded. Proof. (i) ⇔ (ii). The implication (i) ⇒ (ii) is trivial. To check (ii) ⇒ (i), we fix some coarse embedding f : X → R +. Then we pick λ > 0 such that d(a, b) ≤ 1 implies |f(a)−f(b)| < λ. Given an arbitrary points x, x ′ ∈ X, we choose the points x1, . . . , xn on the geodesic segment [x, x ′ ] such that x = x1, d(x1, x2) = . . . d(xn−1, xn) = 1, d(xn, x ′ ) < 1. Then every segment of length λ on [f(x), f(x ′ )] contains at least one point f(x1), . . . , f(xn). Since f(X) is unbounded in R +, it follows that f(X) is large, so we get (i). (i) ⇒ (iii) Let f be a coarse embedding of (X, d) into R + such that f(X) is large in R +. By Lemma 3, f is a (λ, C)-isometric embedding. Changing the value of f in x0 we get a (λ′, C ′)-isometric embedding for some parameters λ′, C ′, so we may suppose that f(x0) = 0 and f(x0) ≤ f(x) for every x ∈ X. We put g = 1 λ f , C1 = C λ . Then g is (1, C1) isometric embedding of (X, d) into R + and, for all x, y ∈ X, we have d(x, y) − C1 ≤ |g(x) − g(y)| ≤ d(x, y) + C1 |g(x0) − g(x)| − C1 ≤ d(x0, x) ≤ |g(x0) − g(y)| + C1. Now let d(x0, x) ≤ d(x0, y). Then g(x) − g(x0) − C1 ≤ g(y) − g(x0) + C1, g(x) − g(y) ≤ 2C1. If g(y) ≥ g(x) we have d(x0, x) + d(x, y) ≤ |g(x0) − g(x)| + |g(x) − g(y)| + 2C1 = g(x) − g(x0) + g(y) − g(x) + 2C1 = |g(y) − g(x0)| + 2C1 ≤ d(x0, y) + 3C1. O. Kuchaiev, I. V. Protasov 189 If g(y) ≤ g(x) then g(x) − g(y) ≤ 2C1, and we have d(x0, x) + d(x, y) ≤ |g(x0) − g(x)| + |g(x) − g(y)| + 2C1 ≤ |g(x0) − g(x)| + 4C1 ≤ d(x0, x) + 5C1 ≤ d(x0, y) + 5C1. In both cases we see that (X, d) is a 5C1-ray. (iii) ⇒ (iv) follows from Lemma 2. (iv) ⇒ (iii). We choose ε > 0 such that diam S(x0, r) ≤ ε for every r ≥ 0. Let x, y ∈ X and d(x0, x) ≤ d(x0, y). Since (X, d) is geodesic, there exists a point x′ on the geodesic segment [x0, y] such that d(x0, x) = d(x0, x ′). Then d(x0, x) + d(x, y) ≤ d(x0, x ′) + d(x, x′) + d(x′, y) = d(x, y) + d(x, x′) ≤ d(x0, y) + ε. (iii) ⇒ (ii) follows from Lemma 1. A subspace L of a metric space is called a geodesic ray if L is an isometric copy of R +. An unbounded metric space (X, d) is called proper if every closed ball B(x, r) in (X, d) is compact. The next lemma is a geodesic version of Kønig Lemma stating that every infinite locally finite graph has an infinite chain. Lemma 4. Every proper geodesic metric space (X, d) has a geodesic ray. Proof. We use the Hausdorff distance dH defined on the set C(X) of all compact subsets of (X, d) by the rule dH(C, C ′) = inf{ε > 0 : C ⊆ B(C ′, ε), C ′ ⊆ B(C, ε)}, where B(C, ε) = ⋃ c∈C B(c, ε). By [5, Proposition 7.2], C(Y ) is compact for every compact metric space Y . We fix an arbitrary point x0 ∈ X and, for every n ∈ ω, pick xn ∈ X such that d(x0, xn) = n. For every n ∈ ω, we choose a geodesic segment [x0, xn]. Since every space C(B(x0, m)), m ∈ ω is compact, there exists a subsequence (nk)k∈ω of ω such, that for every m ∈ ω the sequence (B(x0, m) ∩ [x0, xnk ])k∈ω converges to some subset Lm. It is a standard verification that L = ⋃ m∈ω Lm is a geodesic ray. 190 Coarse rays Theorem 2. A proper geodesic metric space (X, d) is a coarse ray if and only if (X, d) has a large geodesic ray. Proof. Let (X, d) be a coarse ray. By Lemma 4, (X, d) has a geodesic L. By the equivalence (i) ⇔ (iv) of Theorem 1, L is large in (X, d). On the other hand, if (X, d) has a large geodesic ray then (X, d) is a coarse ray by definition. Example 2. We construct a geodesic (non-proper) coarse ray (X, d) which has no geodesic rays. To this end we take a disjoint family {[an, bn] : n ∈ ω} of segments of length n, and stick together all the points an, n ∈ ω. Denote by a the resulting point. Then, for every m ∈ ω, we choose the points xn, n ∈ ω, n ≥ m such that xn ∈ [a, bn], |[a, xn]| = m, and connect any two points xn, xk, m ≤ n < k by the segment of length 1. Let X be the resulting set endowed with the path metric d. By the equivalence (i) ⇔ (iv) of Theorem 1, (X, d) is a coarse ray. To see that (X, d) has no geodesic rays it suffices to observe that every geodesic segment connecting the points a, x, where x ∈ [a, bn], lies on the segment [a, bn]. We say that a subspace L of a metric space (X, d) is an almost geodesic ray if there exist c ≥ 0 and a bijection f : R + → L such that, for all t1, t2 ∈ R +, we have |t2 − t1| ≤ d(f(t1), f(t2)) ≤ |t2 − t1| + c. Clearly, every almost geodesic ray is a coarse ray. Theorem 3. A geodesic metric space (X, d) is a coarse ray if and only if (X, d) has a large almost geodesic ray. Proof. Let (X, d) be a coarse ray, x0 ∈ X. By Theorem 1, there exists C ≥ 0 such that diamS(x0, t) ≤ C for every t ∈ R +. Since (X, d) is geodesic, for every t ≥ 0, the set S(x0, t) is non-empty, so we can take some point f(t) ∈ S(x0, t) and get the mapping f : R + → X. We put L = f(R+), note that L is large in (X, d) and show that L is an almost geodesic ray. Let t1, t2 ∈ R + and t1 ≤ t2. Since (X, d) is geodesic, there exists y ∈ S(x0, t1) such that d(f(t2), z) = t2 − t1. Then t2 − t1 ≤ d(f(t1), f(t2)) ≤ d(f(t1), z) + d(z, f(t2)) ≤ (t2 − t1) + C. O. Kuchaiev, I. V. Protasov 191 On the other hand, if L is a large almost geodesic ray in (X, d), then L is a coarse ray, so (X, d) is also a coarse ray. For r > 0, a subset Y of a metric space (X, d) is called r-discrete if d(a, b) ≥ r for any a, b ∈ Y, a 6= b. The r-capacity of Y is the cardinal sup{|Z| : Z is r-discrete subset of Y }. A metric space (X, d) is of bounded geometry if there exists a number r > 0 and a function c : R + → R + such that the r-capacity of every ball B(x, t) does not exceed c(t). A metric d on a set X is called ultrametric if, for all x, y, z, d(x, y) ≤ max{d(x, y), d(z, y)} Theorem 4. An ultrametric space (X, d) is coarsely emenddable in the ray if and only if (X, d) is of bounded geometry. Proof. Let (X, d) be a space of bounded geometry. We fix the corre- sponding r > 0, c : R + → R + and choose a maximal r-discrete subspace Y of X. Given any x ∈ X, there exists y ∈ Y such that d(x, y) ≤ r. It follows that Y is large in (X, d), so Y is coarsely equivalent to (X, d). Every ball of radius t in Y has at most c(t) points, in particular, Y is a proper metric space. By [2, Theorem 3.11], Y is coarsely emenddable into the subspace M of R + consisting of all integers whose tercimal de- composition does not contain 1. Since X is coarsely equivalent to Y , there exists a coarse embedding of X into R +. On the other hand, let (X, d) be coarsely equivalent to some subspace Z of R +. Since Z is of bounded geometry, it is easy to check that (X, d) is also of bounded geometry. Problem. Detect all metric spaces coarsely emenddable in the ray R +. References [1] A. Dranishnikov, Asymptotic topology // Russian Math. Surveys, 55 (2000), N 6, 71–116. [2] A. Dranishnikov, M. Zarichnyi, Universal spaces for asymptotic dimension // Topol. Appl. 140 (2004), N 2–3, 203–225. [3] M. Gromov, Asymptotic invariants of infinite groups, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. 182, 1993. [4] I. Protasov, M. Zarichnyi, General Asymptology, Math. Stud. Monogr. Sec., 13, 2006. [5] J. Roe, Lectures on Coarse Geometry, AMS University Lecture Series, 31, 2003. 192 Coarse rays Contact information O. Kuchaiev, Igor V. Protasov Department of Cybernetics, Kyiv National University Volodimirska 64, Kyiv, 01033, Ukraine E-Mail: akuchaev@inbox.ru protasov@unicyb.kiev.ua