Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy

The 5083 aluminum alloy surfaces were coated with chromate conversion coatings. Then epoxy paints were applied on the chromate and non-chromate treatment surfaces. The adhesion, hardness and corrosion resistance of the coated samples were evaluated using adhesion tape test, pencil hardness test, sal...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2012
Автори: Eshaghi Ameneh, Eshaghi Akbar
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Фізико-механічний інститут ім. Г.В. Карпенка НАН України 2012
Назва видання:Фізико-хімічна механіка матеріалів
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/139353
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy / Eshaghi Ameneh, Eshaghi Akbar // Фізико-хімічна механіка матеріалів. — 2012. — Т. 48, № 2. — С. 47-50. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-139353
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1393532018-06-21T03:06:54Z Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy Eshaghi Ameneh Eshaghi Akbar The 5083 aluminum alloy surfaces were coated with chromate conversion coatings. Then epoxy paints were applied on the chromate and non-chromate treatment surfaces. The adhesion, hardness and corrosion resistance of the coated samples were evaluated using adhesion tape test, pencil hardness test, salt spray and electrochemical technique. The results indicated that the adhesion of the coating systems including chromate treatments was better than that of non-chromate conversion coatings, whereas the hardness of the coating systems was equal. Salt spray results showed that corrosion propagation from the scratched area in the painted samples with chromate treatment was lower than that of nonchromate coated surfaces. In addition, electrochemical corrosion measurements indicated that the coating system including chromate treatment presented lower corrosion current density, bigger polarization resistance and less negative corrosion potential than those of the non-chromate conversion coated surfaces. Досліджено вплив хроматної конверсійної обробки алюмінієвого сплаву 5083 на адгезію епоксидних лакофарбових покривів та їх захисні властивості. Встановлено, що адгезія покривів по поверхні сплаву з хроматним конверсійним шаром більша, ніж за безхроматної обробки, а їх твердість в обох випадках однакова. Корозія металу під плівкою біля дефекту лакофарбового покриву за умов попереднього хроматування протікає не так інтенсивно, як після безхроматної обробки. Зразки сплаву зі системою покриву, яка охоплювала хроматну обробку, мали нижчі густини струму корозії, більший поляризаційний опір та менш негативний потенціал корозії, ніж безхроматно оброблені. Исследовано влияние хроматной конверсионной обработки алюминиевого сплава 5083 на адгезию эпоксидных лакокрасочных покрытий и их защитные свойства. Установлено, что адгезия покрытий по поверхности сплава с хроматным конверсионным слоем больше, нежели после безхроматной обработки, а их твердость в обеих случаях одинакова. Коррозия металла под пленкой возле дефекта лакокрасочного покрытия после предварительного хромирования протекает не так интенсивно, как после безхроматной обработки. Образцы сплава с системой покрытия, которая охватывала хроматную обработку, имели меньшую плотность тока коррозии, большее поляризационное сопротивление и менее негативный потенциал коррозии, нежели безхроматно обработанные. 2012 Article Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy / Eshaghi Ameneh, Eshaghi Akbar // Фізико-хімічна механіка матеріалів. — 2012. — Т. 48, № 2. — С. 47-50. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв. — англ. 0430-6252 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/139353 en Фізико-хімічна механіка матеріалів Фізико-механічний інститут ім. Г.В. Карпенка НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description The 5083 aluminum alloy surfaces were coated with chromate conversion coatings. Then epoxy paints were applied on the chromate and non-chromate treatment surfaces. The adhesion, hardness and corrosion resistance of the coated samples were evaluated using adhesion tape test, pencil hardness test, salt spray and electrochemical technique. The results indicated that the adhesion of the coating systems including chromate treatments was better than that of non-chromate conversion coatings, whereas the hardness of the coating systems was equal. Salt spray results showed that corrosion propagation from the scratched area in the painted samples with chromate treatment was lower than that of nonchromate coated surfaces. In addition, electrochemical corrosion measurements indicated that the coating system including chromate treatment presented lower corrosion current density, bigger polarization resistance and less negative corrosion potential than those of the non-chromate conversion coated surfaces.
format Article
author Eshaghi Ameneh
Eshaghi Akbar
spellingShingle Eshaghi Ameneh
Eshaghi Akbar
Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy
Фізико-хімічна механіка матеріалів
author_facet Eshaghi Ameneh
Eshaghi Akbar
author_sort Eshaghi Ameneh
title Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy
title_short Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy
title_full Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy
title_fullStr Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy
title_full_unstemmed Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy
title_sort effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy
publisher Фізико-механічний інститут ім. Г.В. Карпенка НАН України
publishDate 2012
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/139353
citation_txt Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy / Eshaghi Ameneh, Eshaghi Akbar // Фізико-хімічна механіка матеріалів. — 2012. — Т. 48, № 2. — С. 47-50. — Бібліогр.: 10 назв. — англ.
series Фізико-хімічна механіка матеріалів
work_keys_str_mv AT eshaghiameneh effectofchromateconversioncoatingsontheadhesionandcorrosionresistanceofpainted5083aluminumalloy
AT eshaghiakbar effectofchromateconversioncoatingsontheadhesionandcorrosionresistanceofpainted5083aluminumalloy
first_indexed 2025-07-10T08:03:20Z
last_indexed 2025-07-10T08:03:20Z
_version_ 1837246297322553344
fulltext 47 Ô³çèêî-õ³ì³÷íà ìåõàí³êà ìàòåð³àë³â. – 2012. – ¹ 2. – Physicochemical Mechanics of Materials EFFECT OF CHROMATE CONVERSION COATINGS ON THE ADHESION AND CORROSION RESISTANCE OF PAINTED 5083 ALUMINUM ALLOY AMENEH ESHAGHI 1, AKBAR ESHAGHI 1, 2 1 Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran; 2 Maleke Ashtar University of Technology, Shahinshahr, Isfahan, Iran The 5083 aluminum alloy surfaces were coated with chromate conversion coatings. Then epoxy paints were applied on the chromate and non-chromate treatment surfaces. The ad- hesion, hardness and corrosion resistance of the coated samples were evaluated using ad- hesion tape test, pencil hardness test, salt spray and electrochemical technique. The results indicated that the adhesion of the coating systems including chromate treatments was better than that of non-chromate conversion coatings, whereas the hardness of the coating systems was equal. Salt spray results showed that corrosion propagation from the scra- tched area in the painted samples with chromate treatment was lower than that of non- chromate coated surfaces. In addition, electrochemical corrosion measurements indicated that the coating system including chromate treatment presented lower corrosion current density, bigger polarization resistance and less negative corrosion potential than those of the non-chromate conversion coated surfaces. Keywords: adhesion, aluminum, chromating, corrosion, paint. Aluminum-magnesium alloys of the 5xxx series are commonly used in marine applications where low density, favorable mechanical properties and relatively good corrosion resistance are desired [1, 2]. The electrochemical behavior of Al and its alloys has attracted the attention of many investigators. However, the natural oxide film on aluminum alloys does not offer sufficient protection against aggressive anions in seawater environment such as chloride ions leading to the formation of localized corrosion on the aluminum surface [2, 3]. The protection by organic coatings is the most dominant among the various surface-protection methods due to their perfor- mance, commercial feasibility, and simple application [4]. However, the formation of adhesive and lasting organic coatings on aluminum alloys depends on the surface pre- treatment prior to painting. Chromate conversion coatings (CCCs) are highly effective methods of aluminum alloys surface pretreatment for service in corrosive environments [5, 6]. In spite of the toxicity, CCCs provide further advantages such as low cost, good paint adhesion, and quick and easy application [7, 8]. Another important aspect of CCCs is the dynamic repair of defects on coated metals, which is called self-healing effect. Self-healing arises with a storage of soluble Cr(VI) species located in the outer layer of mainly Cr(III) hydrated oxide/hydroxide coating. Upon contact with an elec- trolyte, the labile Cr(VI) is released into solution and is transported to damage areas where it is reduced and precipitated to form an insoluble Cr(III) hydroxide barrier [9, 10]. However, the main attractions for chromate conversion coatings in industrial applications are paint adhesion improvement on Al alloys and self-healing effect in the scratched area exposed to corrosive environments. The effect of chromate conversion coating on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of 5083 aluminum alloy painted was investigated in the present work. Corresponding author: A. ESHAGHI, e-mail: eshaghi.akbar@gmail.com 48 Experimental. The 5083 aluminum alloy specimens (20×10 cm) with composi- tion 4…4.9% Mg, 0.4…1% Mn, 0.05…0.25% Cr, 0.4% Si, 0.4% Fe, 0.1% Cu, 0.25% Zn, and 0.15% Ti were used as the substrate material for the current study. The spe- cimens were degreased by wiping with a paper towel wetted with acetone, rinsed in deionized water, alkaline pickled 30 s in NaOH (12.5 N) at 70°C, rinsed, acid pickled 60 s in 50% HNO3 at 30°C, rinsed, dried and stored in an inert grease-free atmosphere for at least 24 h. Some of these specimens were chromate conversion coated and others were the non-chromate coated. For the chromate treatment, the specimen was immersed in the chromate bathe: 64 g/l H3PO4, 10 g/l CrO3, 5 g/l NaF, pH 1.5, T = 30°C, for 2 min. After that, samples were rinsed with de-ionized water and dried at room temperature. After proper surface preparation, epoxy paints (epoxy primer HB, MIL-P-24441/1, thickness 50 µm and epoxy finish HB, MIL-P-24441/2, thickness 153 µm) were deposited on the chromate (thickness 2 µm) and non-chromate treatment samples by a brush method. The adhesion of coating systems (before and after of salt spray test) was measured according to the ASTM D3359 standard (Tape test). Hardness of coatings was measured according to the ASTM D3363 by using a pencil design (from 6B to 6H). This method is one of the simplest to measure the coatings hardness. The salt spray test was conducted on the coated specimens according to the ASTM B117 standard. For this test, the coated specimens were scratched diago- nally (Fig. 1) and exposed in the salt spray fog chamber containing 5 wt.% sodium chloride solution at 35°C for a period of 30 days. Five percent sodium chloride solution was sprayed using a compressor with a pressure of 10…25 Psi. The observation of the coated specimens was taken periodically. The purpose of this test was the corrosion propagation measurement and the determination of coating blistering around the scra- tched area on the painted samples. Electrochemical corrosion measurements were carried out in a 3.5 wt.% sodium chloride aqueous solution. A conventional three-electrode electrochemical cell was uti- lized. In this cell, a SCE as the reference electrode, a platinum foil as the counter elec- trode, and the 5083 aluminum alloy coated and non-coated surfaces (non-scratched) were the working electrodes with the exposed area 1.0 cm2. The electrolyte solution was not stirred or aerated. Tafel plots were generated by scanning the potential from Ecorr to ±250 mV. The scans were started at 250 mV vs SCE with a sweep rate of 5 mV/s. Corrosion current (Icorr) was determined by superimposing a straight line along the linear portion of cathodic or anodic curve and extrapolation it through Ecorr. Results and discussion. Table 1 presents the results of adhesion tape test. By comparing the results, it can be seen that adhesion of the paint of the chromating sur- faces is better than that of the non-chromating. Thus, the role of the surface pretreat- ment in the adhesion of coating on the aluminum alloy is determined. Aluminum has a flat surface, thus it cannot adsorb and keep the paints. Application of the chromate con- version coatings generate in the aluminum surfaces some micro voids which act as capillary tubes and paint penetrates into these voids and traps. Therefore, chromate conversion coating has capillaries and micro cavities, which provide mechanical inter- locking. As a result, adhesion mechanism of paints in the presence of chromate conver- sion coating could be explained by the mechanical locking phenomena. Fig. 1. Scratched sample in salt spray chamber. 49 Table 1. Adhesion and hardness results of coating systems Coating system Total thickness, µm Adhesion (before salt spray) Adhesion (after salt spray) Hardness 1-Chromate layer Epoxy primer Epoxy finish 202 5B 5B HB 2-Epoxy primer Epoxy finish 200 3B 0B HB The hardness of coating depends on the topcoat resin kinds. In two coating sys- tems, topcoats were equal and therefore, two coating systems showed equal hardness. The hardness of coatings does not depend on the surface pretreatment prior to painting. The results of the salt spray test are shown in the Table 2. The most effective pro- perties of organic coating systems were the resistance to penetration of corrosive agents and corrosion propagation. Table 2. Results of salt spray test Exposure time, h 120 240 360 480 600 720 Coating system Corrosion propagation, mm 1 0 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.16 0.2 2 0.15 0.33 0.68 0.97 1.27 1.5 According to salt spray results (Fig. 2) corrosion propagation (lcorr) from the scra- tched area into the coating systems including chromate treatment was lower than that of the non-chromate coating. The reason of this phenomenon can be attributed to the self-healing effect of chromate treatment. The hexavalent Cr particles in the chro- mate coatings dissolved due to arriving of moisture and these particles migrated to the scratched area and repaired the injury [9, 10]. Then corrosion propagation re- duces or stops. Furthermore, in the non- chromate treatment the blistering was seen around the scratched area, which is 5 mm in the diameter. This phenomenon occurs due to weak adhesion of coating and moisture, which easily penetrates under the coating and causes blistering. Thus, chromating treatments have several objectives for the painted surfaces: (1) to act as a barrier layer providing corrosion protection, and (2) to improve the adhesion between the organic coating and the metal surface so that it avoids undercoat corrosion when it is applied before the organic coating and (3) a self-healing effect. Table 3 presents the results of electrochemical corrosion measurement. Applica- tion of coatings on the 5083 aluminium alloy decreases the Icorr value. The polarization resistance shows maximum for the coatings including chromate treatment and declines for the non-coated surfaces. These results indicate that the coatings including chromate layer protect aluminium better than the non-chromate layer. Fig. 2. Time dependence of corrosion propa- gation from the scratch on the specimen with chromate (1) and non-chromate (2) coating. 50 Table 3. Results of potentiodynamic polarization measurements Sample Coating system Ecorr, mV Icorr, µА/cm2 Rp, Ω Corrosion rate, mpy 5083 Al – –824 8.495 4.9 3.7 5083 Al 1 –758 1.849 62.2 0.81 5083 Al 2 –760 5.123 16.25 2.23 CONCLUSION The effect of chromate treatment on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of alu- minium alloy painted was investigated. Adhesion test results indicated that paint adhe- sion on the aluminium alloy was improved by chromating treatment. Salt spray test showed that the samples with chromate treatment were more resistance to corrosion in the painted surface, which is congruent to the electrochemical evaluation. РЕЗЮМЕ. Досліджено вплив хроматної конверсійної обробки алюмінієвого сплаву 5083 на адгезію епоксидних лакофарбових покривів та їх захисні властивості. Встановле- но, що адгезія покривів по поверхні сплаву з хроматним конверсійним шаром більша, ніж за безхроматної обробки, а їх твердість в обох випадках однакова. Корозія металу під плівкою біля дефекту лакофарбового покриву за умов попереднього хроматування проті- кає не так інтенсивно, як після безхроматної обробки. Зразки сплаву зі системою покриву, яка охоплювала хроматну обробку, мали нижчі густини струму корозії, більший поляри- заційний опір та менш негативний потенціал корозії, ніж безхроматно оброблені. РЕЗЮМЕ. Исследовано влияние хроматной конверсионной обработки алюминие- вого сплава 5083 на адгезию эпоксидных лакокрасочных покрытий и их защитные свой- ства. Установлено, что адгезия покрытий по поверхности сплава с хроматным конверси- онным слоем больше, нежели после безхроматной обработки, а их твердость в обеих слу- чаях одинакова. Коррозия металла под пленкой возле дефекта лакокрасочного покрытия после предварительного хромирования протекает не так интенсивно, как после безхро- матной обработки. Образцы сплава с системой покрытия, которая охватывала хроматную обработку, имели меньшую плотность тока коррозии, большее поляризационное сопро- тивление и менее негативный потенциал коррозии, нежели безхроматно обработанные. 1. Annealing behavior of a modified 5083 aluminum alloy / S. Lin, Z. Nie, H. Huang, and B. Li // Mater. and Design. – 2010. – 31. – P. 1607–1612. 2. Mishra A. K. and Balasubramaniam R. Corrosion inhibition of aluminum alloy AA 2014 by rare earth chlorides / Corr. Sci. – 2007. – 49. – P. 1027–1044. 3. Ezuber H., Houd A. E., and El-Shawesh F. A study on the corrosion behavior of aluminum alloys in seawater / Mater. and Design. – 2008. – 29. – P. 801–805. 4. Kumar S. A., Alagar M., and Mohan V. Studies on corrosion-resistant behavior of siliconized epoxy interpenetrating coatings over mild steel surface by electrochemical methods / J. of Mater. Engng. and Performance. – 2002. – 11. – P. 123–126. 5. Substitution of hexavalent chromate conversion treatment with a plasma electrolytic oxi- dation process to improve the corrosion properties of ion vapour deposited AlMg coatings / N. M. Alanazi, A. Leyland, A. L. Yerokhin, and A. Matthews // Surface & Coating Tech- nol. – 2010. (In press) 6. Oki M. and Charles E. Chromate conversion coating on Al–0.2wt.% Fe alloy / Materials Letters. – 2009. – 63. – P. 1990–1994. 7. Lu G., Ada E. T., and Zangari G. Investigation of the effect of chromate conversion coatings on the corrosion resistance of Ni based alloys / Electrochimistry Acta. – 2004. – 49. – P. 1461–1473. 8. Application of a factorial design to study a chromate-conversion process / S. Wery, M. D. P. We- ry, M. Feki, and H. F. Ayedi / J. of Coating Technol. and Research. – 2010. – 7. – P. 39–47. 9. Andreva D. V. and Shchukin D. G. Smart self-repairing protective coating / Mater. Today. – 2008. – 11. – P. 24–30. 10. Synthesis and characterization of chromate conversion coatings on galvalume and galvanized steel substrates / M. A. D. N. Crespo, E. O. Bustamante, A. M. T. Huerta et al. // Metall. and Mater. Trans. A. – 2009. – 40. – P. 1631–1644. Received 28.02.2011