Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map

We present an important contribution to the noncommutative approach to the hydrogen atom to deal with Lamb shift corrections. This can be done by studying the Klein{Gordon and Dirac equations in a non-commutative space-time up to first-order of the noncommutativity parameter using the Seiberg-Witten...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2016
1. Verfasser: Zaim, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України 2016
Schriftenreihe:Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии
Online Zugang:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/140560
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map / S. Zaim // Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии. — 2016. — Т. 12, № 4. — С. 359-373. — Бібліогр.: 46 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-140560
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1405602018-07-11T01:23:16Z Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map Zaim, S. We present an important contribution to the noncommutative approach to the hydrogen atom to deal with Lamb shift corrections. This can be done by studying the Klein{Gordon and Dirac equations in a non-commutative space-time up to first-order of the noncommutativity parameter using the Seiberg-Witten maps. We thus find the noncommutative modification of the energy levels and by comparing with the current experimental results on the Lamb shift of the 2P level to extract a bound on the parameter of noncommutativity, we show that the fundamental length (√Θ) is compatible with the value of the electroweak length scale (l). Phenomenologically, this effectively confirms the presence of gravity at this level. 2016 Article Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map / S. Zaim // Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии. — 2016. — Т. 12, № 4. — С. 359-373. — Бібліогр.: 46 назв. — англ. 1812-9471 DOI : doi.org/10.15407/mag12.04.359 Mathematics Subject Classification 2000: 81T80, 37K05, 81Q05 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/140560 en Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description We present an important contribution to the noncommutative approach to the hydrogen atom to deal with Lamb shift corrections. This can be done by studying the Klein{Gordon and Dirac equations in a non-commutative space-time up to first-order of the noncommutativity parameter using the Seiberg-Witten maps. We thus find the noncommutative modification of the energy levels and by comparing with the current experimental results on the Lamb shift of the 2P level to extract a bound on the parameter of noncommutativity, we show that the fundamental length (√Θ) is compatible with the value of the electroweak length scale (l). Phenomenologically, this effectively confirms the presence of gravity at this level.
format Article
author Zaim, S.
spellingShingle Zaim, S.
Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map
Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии
author_facet Zaim, S.
author_sort Zaim, S.
title Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map
title_short Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map
title_full Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map
title_fullStr Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map
title_full_unstemmed Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map
title_sort noncommutative space-time of the relativistic equations with a coulomb potential using seiberg-witten map
publisher Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
publishDate 2016
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/140560
citation_txt Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg-Witten Map / S. Zaim // Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии. — 2016. — Т. 12, № 4. — С. 359-373. — Бібліогр.: 46 назв. — англ.
series Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии
work_keys_str_mv AT zaims noncommutativespacetimeoftherelativisticequationswithacoulombpotentialusingseibergwittenmap
first_indexed 2025-07-10T10:44:17Z
last_indexed 2025-07-10T10:44:17Z
_version_ 1837256424061665280
fulltext Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry 2016, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 359–373 Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations with a Coulomb Potential Using Seiberg–Witten Map S. Zaim Département de Physique, Faculté des Sciences de la Matière, Université Batna1, Algeria E-mail: zaim69slimane@yahoo.com Received July 8, 2015 We present an important contribution to the noncommutative approach to the hydrogen atom to deal with Lamb shift corrections. This can be done by studying the Klein–Gordon and Dirac equations in a non-commutative space-time up to first-order of the noncommutativity parameter using the Seiberg–Witten maps. We thus find the noncommutative modification of the energy levels and by comparing with the current experimental results on the Lamb shift of the 2P level to extract a bound on the parameter of noncommutativity, we show that the fundamental length ( √ Θ) is compatible with the value of the electroweak length scale (l). Phenomenologically, this effectively confirms the presence of gravity at this level. Key words: non-commutative geometry methods, field theory, Klein– Gordon and Dirac equations. Mathematics Subject Classification 2010: 81T80, 37K05, 81Q05. 1. Introduction The standard concept of space-time as a geometric manifold is based on the notion of a manifold whose points are locally labelled by a finite number of real coordinates. However, it is generally believed that this picture of space- time as a manifold should break down at very short distances of the order of the Planck length. This implies that the mathematical concepts of high energy physics has to be changed or, more precisely, our classical geometric concepts may not be well-suited for the description of physical phenomenon at short distances [1–3]. The connection between the string theory and the non-commutativity [4– 7] motivated a large amount of work to study and understand many physical c© S. Zaim, 2016 S. Zaim phenomena. The study of this geometry has raised new physical consequences and thus, recently, a noncommutative description of quantum mechanics has stimulated a large amount of research [8–15]. The non-commutative field theory is characterized by the commutation relations between the position coordinate operators themselves, namely, [x̂µ, x̂ν ] = iΘµν , (1) and the star Moyal product ∗ is defined between two fields ψ (x) and ϕ (x) by ψ (x) ∗ ϕ (x) = exp ( i 2 Θµν ∂ ∂xµ ∂ ∂yν ) ψ (x) ϕ (y) |y=x, (2) where Θµν are the noncommutative constant parameters in the canonical non- commutative space-time. The issue of time-space noncommutativity is worth pursuing on its own right because of its deep connection with such fundamental notions as unitarity and causality. Much attention has been devoted in recent times to circumvent these difficulties in formulating theories with Θ0i 6= 0 [1, 2, 16, 17]. There are similar examples of theories with time-space noncommutativity in the literature [18–20] where unitarity is preserved by a perturbative approach [21]. The most obvious natural phenomena to search for noncommutative effects are simple systems of quantum mechanics in the presence of a magnetic field, such as a hydrogen atom. In the noncommutative time-space one expects the degeneracy of the spectrum levels to be lifted, and therefore one can say that the noncommutativity plays the role of the magnetic field. The study of the exact and approximate solutions of the relativistic hydrogen atom has proved to be fruitful and many papers have been published [22–25]. In this work we present an important contribution to the noncommutative approach to the relativistic description of the hydrogen atom. Our goal is to solve the Klein–Gordan and Dirac equations for the Coulomb potential in a noncommutative space-time up to first-order of the noncommutativity parameter using the Seiberg–Witten maps and the Moyal product. We thus find the noncommutative modification of the energy levels of the hydrogen atom and we show that the noncommutativity is the source of a magnetic field resulting in the Lamb shift corrections. We also note that the effect of noncommutativity confirms the presence of gravity at the very short distances. In a previous work [26, 27], by solving the deformed Klein–Gordon and Dirac equations in a canonical noncommutative space, we showed that the energy is shifted, where the correction is proportional to the magnetic quantum number, which behavior is similar to the Zeeman effect as applied to a system without spin in a magnetic field, thus we explicitly accounted for spin effects in this space. 360 Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations... The purpose of this paper is to study the extension of the Klein–Gordon and Dirac fields in canonical noncommutative time-space by applying the result obtained to a hydrogen atom. The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, we propose an invariant action of the noncommutative boson and fermion fields in the presence of an electromag- netic field. In Sec. 3, using the generalized Euler–Lagrange field equations, we derive the deformed Klein–Gordon (KG) and Dirac equations for the hydrogen atom. We solve these deformed equations and obtain the noncommutative mod- ification of the energy levels. Furthermore, we derive the non-relativistic limit of the noncommutative KG equation for a hydrogen atom and solve it using the perturbation theory. Finally, in Sec. 4, we draw our conclusions. 2. Action The canonical noncommutative space-time is characterized by the commuta- tion relations of coordinate operators satisfying relation (1). In order to preserve this relation, the infinitesimal gauge transformation is generalized by the follow- ing relation: φ̂A (A) + δ̂λ̂φ̂A (A) = φ̂A (A + δλA) , (3) where φ̂A = (µ, ψ̂) is a non-commutative generic field, µ and ψ̂ are the non- commutative gauge and matter fields, respectively, λ is the U(1) gauge Lie-valued infinitesimal transformation parameter, δλ is the ordinary gauge transformation and δ̂λ̂ is a non-commutative gauge transformation which are defined by: δ̂λ̂ψ̂ = iλ̂ ∗ ψ̂, δλψ = iλψ, (4) δ̂λ̂µ = ∂µλ̂ + i [ λ̂, µ ] ∗ , δλAµ = ∂µλ. (5) Now using these transformations one can get at second order in the noncom- mutative parameter Θµν the following Seiberg–Witten maps [4]: ψ̂ = ψ + ψ1 +O ( Θ2 ) , (6) λ̂ = λ + λ1 (λ,Aµ) +O ( Θ2 ) , (7) Âξ = Aξ + A1 ξ (Aξ) +O ( Θ2 ) , (8) F̂µξ = Fµξ (Aξ) + F 1 µξ (Aξ) +O ( Θ2 ) , (9) where ψ1 = − i 2 Θαβ({Aα, ∂βψ}+ 1 2 {[ψ,Aα] , Aβ}), (10) λ1 = Θαβ∂αλAβ, (11) A1 ξ = 1 2 ΘαβAα ( ∂ξAβ − 2∂βA ξ ) , (12) F 1 µξ = −Θαβ (Aα∂βFµξ + FµαFβξ) , (13) Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 361 S. Zaim and Fµν = ∂µAν − ∂νAµ. (14) To begin, we consider an action for a free boson and fermion fields in the presence of an electrodynamic gauge field in a noncommutative space-time. We propose the following action [28]: S = ∫ d4x ( LMB + LMF − 1 4 F̂µν ∗ F̂µν ) , (15) where LMB and LMF are the boson and fermion matter densities, respectively, in the non-commutative space-time and are given by LMB = ηµν ( D̂µϕ̂ )† ∗ D̂νϕ̂ + m2ϕ̂† ∗ ϕ̂, (16) and LMF = ψ̂ ∗ ( iγνD̂ν −m ) ∗ ψ̂, (17) where the gauge covariant derivative is defined as D̂µ = ∂µ + ieµ. From the action variational principle the generalized equations of Lagrange up to O ( Θ2 ) are [29]: ∂L ∂Φ̂ − ∂µ ∂L ∂ ( ∂µΦ̂ ) + ∂µ∂ν ∂L ∂ ( ∂µ∂νΦ̂ ) +O ( Θ2 ) = 0, (18) where L = LMB + LMF − 1 4 F̂µν ∗ F̂µν . (19) 3. Noncommutative Time-Space KG Equation Using the modified field equation (18) , with the generic boson field ϕ̂, one can find in a free non-commutative space-time and in the presence of the external potential µ the following modified Klein–Gordon equation: ( ηµν∂µ∂ν −m2 e ) ϕ̂ + ( ieηµν∂µÂν − e2ηµνµ ∗ Âν + 2ieηµνµ∂ν ) ϕ̂ = 0, (20) where the deformed external potential µ (−e/r 0 ) in free noncommutative space- time is [30]: â0 = −e r − e3 r4 Θ0kxk +O ( Θ2 ) , (21) âi = e3 4 r4 Θikxk +O ( Θ2 ) , (22) 362 Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations... for a non-commutative time-space, Θ0k 6= 0 and Θki = 0, where i, k = 1, 2, 3. In this case, we can check that ηµν∂µ∂ν = −∂2 0 + ∆, (23) and 2ieηµνµ∂ν = i 2e2 r ∂0 + 2i e4 r4 Θ0jxj∂0, (24) and −e2ηµνµ ∗ Âν = e4 r2 + 2 e6 r5 Θ0jxj , (25) then the Klein-Gordon equation (20) up to O ( Θ2 ) takes the form [ −∂2 0 + ∆−m2 e + e4 r2 + i 2e2 r ∂0 + 2i e4 r4 Θ0jxj∂0 + 2 e6 r5 Θ0jxj ] ϕ̂ = 0. (26) The solution to equation (26) in spherical polar coordinates (r, θ, φ) takes the separable form ϕ̂(r, θ, φ, t) = 1 r R̂(r)Ŷ (θ, φ) exp(−iEt). (27) Then (26) reduces to the radial equation [ d2 dr2 − l(l + 1)− e4 r2 + 2Ee2 r + +E2 −m2 e + 2E e4 r4 Θ0jxj + 2 e6 r5 Θ0jxj ] R̂(r) = 0. (28) In (28), the Coulomb potential in noncommutative space-time appears within the perturbation terms [31]: HΘ pert = 2E e4 r4 Θ0jxj + 2 e6 r5 Θ0jxj , (29) where the first term is the electric dipole–dipole interaction created by the non- commutativity, the second term is the electric dipole–quadruple interaction. These interactions show us that the effect of space-time noncommutativity on the inter- action of the electron and the proton is equivalent to an extension of two nuclei interactions at a considerable distance. This idea effectively confirms the pres- ence of gravity at this level. To investigate the modification of the energy levels by equation (29), we use the first-order perturbation theory. The spectrum of H0 and the corresponding wave functions are well-known and given by Rnl(r) = √ a n + ν + 1 ( n! Γ (n + 2ν + 2) )1/2 xν+1e−x/2L2ν+1 n (x) , (30) Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 363 S. Zaim where the relativistic energy levels are given by E = En,l = me ( n + 1 2 + √( l + 1 2 )2 − α2 ) [( n + 1 2 )2 + ( l + 1 2 )2 + 2 ( n + 1 2 ) √( l + 1 2 )2 − α2 ] 1 2 , (31) and L2ν+1 n are the associated Laguerre polynomials [32], with the following nota- tions: ν = −1 2 + √( l + 1 2 )2 − α2, α = e2, a = √ m2 e −E2. (32) 3.1. Noncommutative corrections of the relativistic energy Now to obtain the modification to the energy levels as a result of the terms (29) due to the noncommutativity of space-time, we use the perturbation theory. For simplicity, first of all, we choose the coordinate system (t, r, θ, ϕ) so that Θ0j = −Θj0 = Θδ01, such that Θ0jxj = Θr and assume that the other components are all zero and also the fact that in first-order perturbation theory the expectation values of 1/r3 and 1/r4 are as follows: 〈nlm | r−3 | nlm′〉 = ∞∫ 0 R2 nl(r)r −3drδmm′ = 4a3n! (n + ν + 1)Γ (n + 2ν + 2) ∞∫ 0 x2ν−1e−x [ L2ν+1 n (x) ]2 dxδmm′ = 4a3n! (n + ν + 1)Γ (n + 2ν + 2) [ Γ (n + 2ν + 2) Γ (n + 1) Γ (2ν + 2) ]2 × ∞∫ 0 x2ν−1e−x [F (−n; 2ν + 2;x)]2 dxδmm′ = 2a3 ν (2ν + 1) (n + ν + 1) { 1 + n (ν + 1) } δmm′ = f(3), (33) 〈nlm | r−4 | nlm′〉 = 4a4 (2ν − 1) ν (2ν + 1) (n + ν + 1) [ 1 + 3n (ν + 1) + 3n (n− 1) (ν + 1) (2ν + 3) ] δmm′ = f(4), (34) 364 Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations... Now, the correction to the energy to first order in Θ is EΘ(1) = 〈ψ0 nlm ∣∣∣HΘ(1) pert ∣∣∣ψ0 nlm〉. (35) where H Θ(1) pert is the noncommutative correction to the first order in Θ of the perturbation Hamiltonian, which is given in the following relation: H Θ(1) pert = 2E e4 r3 Θ + 2 e6 r4 Θ. (36) To calculate EΘ(1), we use the radial function in Eq. (30) to obtain EΘ(1) = 2Θα2 ( E0 n,lf (3) + αf (4) ) . Finally, the energy correction of the hydrogen atom in the framework of the non-commutative KG equation is ∆ENC = EΘ(1) 2E = Θα2 ( f (3) + α E0 n,l f (4) ) . (37) This result is important because it reflects the existence of Lamb shift, which is induced by the noncommutativity of the space. Obviously, when Θ = 0, then ∆ENC = 0, which is exactly the result of the space-space commuting case, where the energy-levels are not shifted. We showed that the energy-level shift for 1S is ∆ENC 1S = Θα2 ( f1S (3) + α E0 1,0 f1S (4) ) . (38) In our analysis, we simply identify spin up if the noncommutativity parameter takes the eigenvalue +Θ and spin down if the noncommutativity parameter takes the eigenvalue −Θ. Also we can say that the Lamb shift is actually induced by the space-time noncommutativity which plays the role of a magnetic field and spin in the same moment (Zemann effect). This represents Lamb shift corrections for l = 0. The result is very important: as a possible means of introducing electron spin we replace l → ± ( j + 1 2 ) and n → n − j − 1 − 1 2 , where j is the quantum number associated to the total angular momentum. Then the l = 0 state has the same total quantum number j = 1 2 . In this case, the noncommutative value of the energy levels indicates the splitting of the 1s states. Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 365 S. Zaim 3.2. Non-relativistic limit The non-relativistic limit of noncommutative K-G Eq. (26) is written as [33, 34]: [ d2 dr2 − l(l + 1) r2 + 2mee 2 r + 2meε + 2me e4 r3 Θ + 2 e6 r4 Θ ] R̂(r) = 0. (39) In this non-relativistic limit the charged boson does not represent a single charged particle, but is a distribution of positive and negative charges which are different and extended in space linearly in √ Θ. The absence of a perturbation term of the form Θ/r2 in the noncommutative Coulomb interaction shows that the distribution of positive and negative charges is spherically symmetric. This can be interpreted as the spherically symmetric distribution of charges of the quarks inside the proton. Now to obtain the modification of energy levels as a result of the noncommu- tative terms in (39), we use the first-order perturbation theory. The spectrum of H0 (Θ = 0) and the corresponding wave functions are well-known and given by εn = −meα 2 2~2n2 , (40) and Rnl(r) = 1 n ( (n− l − 1)! a (n + l)! )1/2 xl+1e−x/2L2l+1 n−l−1(x), x = 2 an r, (41) where a = ~2/(meα) is the Bohr radius of the hydrogen atom. The Coulomb potential in noncommutative space-time appears within the perturbation terms HΘ pert = 2Θα2 (me r3 + α r4 ) +O ( Θ2 ) , (42) where the expectation values of 1/r3 and 1/r4 are as follows: 〈nlm | r−3 | nlm′〉l>0 = 2 a3n3l(l + 1)(2l + 1) δmm′ , (43) 〈nlm | r−4 | nlm′〉l>0 = [ 4 ( 3n2 − l(l + 1) ) a4n5l(l + 1)(2l − 1)(2l + 1)(2l + 3) + 35 ( 3n2 − l(l + 1) ) 3(l − 1)(l + 2)(2l − 1)(2l + 1)(2l + 3) ] δmm′ . (44) Hence the modification to the energy levels is given by ∆ENC = Θα2 [ f (3) + α me f (4) ] +O ( Θ2 ) . (45) 366 Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations... We can also compute the correction to the Lamb shift of the 2P level where we have ∆ENC 2P = 0.243 156 Θ (MeV)3 . (46) According to [35], the current theoretical result for the Lamb shift is 0.08 kHz. From the splitting (46), this then gives the following bound on Θ: Θ ≤ (8.5TeV)−2 . (47) This corresponds to a lower bound for the energy scale of 8.5 TeV, which is in the range that was obtained in [36–39], namely 1–10 TeV. 4. Noncommutative Time-Space Dirac Equation Now, concerning the Dirac equation in the free non-commutative time-space and in the presence of the vector potential µ and using the modified field Eq. (18), with the generic field ψ̂, we can find the modified Dirac equation up to O ( Θ2 ) as (iγµ∂µ −me) ψ̂ − eγµAµψ̂ − eγµA1 µψ̂ + ie 2 Θαβγµ∂αAµ∂βψ̂ = 0. (48) For a noncommutative time-space (Θki = 0, where i, k = 1, 2, 3), in this case we can write: iγµ∂µ −me = iγ0∂0 + iγi∂i −me, (49) −eγµÂµ = e2 r γ0 + e4 r4 γ0Θ0kxk, (50) ie 2 Θαβγµ∂αAµ∂β = −i e2 2 γ0 Θ0kxk r3 ∂0. (51) Then the noncommutative Dirac equation (48) up to O ( Θ2 ) takes the following form: [ iγ0∂0 + iγi∂i −me + e2 r γ0 + e4 r4 γ0Θ0kxk − i e2 2 γ0 Θ0kxk r3 ∂0 ] ψ̂ = 0. (52) We can write this equation as Ĥψ̂ (t, r, θ, ϕ) = i∂0ψ̂ (t, r, θ, ϕ) . (53) Then replacing ψ̂ (t, r, θ, ϕ) → exp (−iEt) ψ̂ (r, θ, ϕ) (54) Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 367 S. Zaim gives the stationary noncommutative Dirac equation Ĥψ̂ (r, θ, ϕ) = Eψ̂ (r, θ, ϕ) , where E is the ordinary energy of the electron and Ĥ is the noncommutative Hamiltonian of the form Ĥ = Ĥ0 + ĤΘ pert, (55) where H0 is the relativistic Hamiltonian for the hydrogen atom Ĥ0 = ~α. ( −i ~∇ ) + βme − e2 r , (56) and HΘ pert is the leading-order perturbation ĤΘ pert = ( E 2 − e2 r ) e2 ~Θt · ~r r3 . (57) The leading long-distance part of HΘ pert behaves like that of a magnetic dipole potential where the noncommutativity plays the role of a magnetic moment. So the noncommutative Coulomb potential is the multipolar contribution and this means that the distribution is not spherically symmetric. In the above the matrices ~α and β are given by β = ( I 0 0 −I ) , αi = ( 0 σi σi 0 ) , where σi are the Pauli matrices: σ1 = ( 0 1 1 0 ) , σ2 = ( 0 −i i 0 ) , σ3 = ( 1 0 0 −1 ) . To investigate the modification of the energy levels by equation (57), we use the first-order perturbation theory, where, by restoring the constants c and ~, the spectrum of Ĥ0 and the corresponding wave functions are well-known and are given by (see [35, 40–45]): ψ (r, θ, ϕ) = ( φ (r, θ, ϕ) χ (r, θ, ϕ) ) = ( f (r)ΩjlM (θ, ϕ) g (r)ΩjlM (θ, ϕ) ) , (58) where the bi-spinors ΩjlM (θ, ϕ) are defined by ΩjlM (θ, ϕ) =   ∓ √ (j+1/2)∓(M−1/2) 2j+(1±1) Yj±1/2,M−1/2 (θ, ϕ)√ (j+1/2)±(M+1/2) 2j+(1±1) Yj±1/2,M+1/2 (θ, ϕ)   , (59) 368 Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations... with the radial functions f (r) and g (r) given as ( f (r) g (r) ) = ( a mc ~ )2 1 ν √ ~c (Eκ −mec2ν) n! (mec2)2 α (κ − ν) Γ (n + 2ν) e− 1 2 xxν−1 × × ( f1xL2ν+1 n−1 (x) + f2L 2ν−1 n (x) g1xL2ν+1 n−1 (x) + g2L 2ν−1 n (x) ) , (60) where the ordinary relativistic energy levels are given by E = En,j = mec 2 (n + ν)√ α2 + (n + ν)2 , n = 0, 1, 2 · · · (61) and Lα n (x) are the associated Laguerre polynomials [32], with the following no- tations: a = 1 mec2 √ (mec2)2 − E2, x = 2 ~c √ (mec2)2 − E2 r, κ = ± ( j + 1 2 ) , ν = √ κ2 − α2, f1 = aα E mec2 κ − ν , f2 = κ − ν, g1 = a (κ − ν) E mec2 κ −meν , g2 = e2 ~c = α. In the above, me is the mass of the electron and α is the fine structure constant. 4.1. Noncommutative Corrections to the Dirac Energy Now to obtain the modification to the energy levels as a result of the terms (57) due to the noncommutativity of time-space, we use the perturbation theory up to the first order. With respect to the selection rule ∆l = 0 and choosing the coordinate system (t, r, θ, ϕ) so that Θ0k = −Θk0 = Θδ01, we have ∆E (Θ) n,j = ∆E (1) n,j + ∆E (2) n,j , (62) where ∆E (1) n,j = E 2~c e2 4π∫ 0 ΘdΩ ∞∫ 0 dr[ψ†njlM (r, θ, ϕ) ψnj′l′M ′ (r, θ, ϕ)] = E 2~c e2ΘMM ′〈 1 r2 〉, (63) Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 369 S. Zaim and ∆E (2) n,j = − e4 ~c 4π∫ 0 ΘdΩ ∞∫ 0 drr−2[ψ†njlM (r, θ, ϕ) ψnj′l′M ′ (r, θ, ϕ)] = − e4 ~c ΘMM ′〈 1 r3 〉, (64) where 〈 1 r2 〉 = 2~c (mec ~ a )3 [ κ ( 2Eκ −mec 2 ) (mec2)2 αν (4ν2 − 1) ] , (65) 〈 1 r3 〉 = (mc ~ a )3 [ 3Eκ ( Eκ −mec 2 ) (mec2)2 ν (4ν2 − 1) (ν2 − 1) − ( mec 2 )2 ( ν2 − 1 ) (mec2)2 ν (4ν2 − 1) (ν2 − 1) ] . (66) From Eq. (62) we obtain the modified energy levels in noncommutative space- time to the first order of Θ as: ∆E (Θ) n,j = ( α ~c )2 mec 2a3 ν (4ν2 − 1) × × [ Eκ (( 2Eκ −mec 2 ) α2 − 3 ( Eκ −mec 2 ) (ν2 − 1) ) + ( mec 2 )2 ] ΘMM ′ . (67) The selection rules for the transitions between the levels ( NlMj → NlM ′ j ) are ∆l = 1 and ∆M = 0,±1, where N = n + |κ| describes the principal quantum number. The 2S1/2 and 2P1/2 levels correspond respectively to (N = 1, j = 1/2,κ = ±1,M = ±1/2) . (68) From (67) and (68) we can write ∆E (Θ) 2S1/2 = 1.944 64× 10−8Θ (MeV)3 , (69) ∆E (Θ) 2P1/2 = ±2.160 75× 10−9Θ (MeV)3 . (70) The non-commutative correction to the transition follows as ∆E (Θ) 2,1/2 ( 2P1/2 → 2S1/2 ) = 2.160715× 10−8Θ (MeV)3 . 370 Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations... Now again using the current theoretical result on the 2P Lamb shift from [39], which is about 0.08 kHz, and from the splitting (69), we get the bound Θ . (0.25TeV)−2 . (71) Restoring the constants c and ~ in (71), we write the bound on the non-commutativity parameter as Θ . 1.7× 10−35m2. (72) It is interesting that the value of the upper bound on the time-space noncom- mutativity parameter as derived here is better than the results of [12, 21, 36, 46]. This value is only in the sense of an upper bound and not the value of the pa- rameter itself for which the fundamental length √ Θ is compatible with the value of the electroweak length scale (`ω). This effectively confirms the presence of gravity at this level. 5. Conclusions In this work we started from quantum relativistic charged scalar and fermion particles in a canonical noncommutative space-time to find the action which is invariant under the infinitesimal gauge transformations. By using the Seiberg– Witten maps and the Moyal product, we derived the deformed KG and Dirac equations for noncommutative Coulomb potential up to first order in the non- commutativity parameter Θ. By solving the deformed KG and Dirac equations, we found the Θ-correction energy shift. This proves that the non-commutativity has an effect similar to that of the magnetic field. The corrections induced to the energy levels by this noncommutative effect and the Lamb shift were induced and compared with experimental results from high precision hydrogen spectroscopy to obtain a new bound for the noncommutativity parameter of around (0.25TeV)−2, for which the fundamental length √ Θ is compatible with the value of the elec- troweak length scale (`ω). This effectively confirms the presence of gravity at this level. References [1] S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen, and J.E. Roberts, Phys. Lett. B 331 (1994), 39. [2] S. Doplicher, K. Fredenhagen, and J.E. Roberts, Commun. Math. Phys. 172 (1995), 187. [3] T. Yoneya, Progr. Theor. Phys. 103 (2000), 1081. [4] N. Seiberg and E. Witten, JHEP 9909 (1999), 032. [5] E. Bergshoeff, D.S. Berman, J.P. van der Schaar, and P. Sundell, Nucl. Phys. B 590 (2000), 173. Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 371 S. Zaim [6] S. Kawamoto and N. Sasakura, JHEP 0007 (2000), 014. [7] A. Das, J. Maharana, and A. Melikyan, JHEP 0104 (2001), 016. [8] S, Cai, T. Jing, G. Guo, and R. Zhang, J. Theor. Phys. 49 (2010), 1699. [9] S. Dulat and K. Li, Chin. Phys. C 32 (2008), 32. [10] J. Gamboa, F. Mondez, M. Loewe, and J.C. Rojas, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16 (2001), 2075. [11] Pei-Ming Ho and Hsien-Chung Kao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), 151602. [12] B. Muthukumar, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005), 105007. [13] K. Li and S. Dulat, Eur. Phys. J. C 46 (2006), 825. [14] K. Li and N. Chamoun, Chin. Phys. Lett. 24 (2007), 1183. [15] S. Dulat and K. Li, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 21 (2006), 2971. [16] O.F. Dayi and B. Yapiskann, JHEP 10 (2002), 022. [17] O. Bertolami and L. Guisado, JHEP 0312 (2003) 013. [18] C.S. Chu, J. Lukierski, and W.J. Zakrzewski, Nucl. Phys. B 632 (2002), 219. [19] D.A. Eliezer and R.P. Woodard, Nucl. Phys. 325 (1989), 389. [20] T.C. Cheng, P.M. Ho, and M.C. Yeh, Nucl. Phys. B 625 (2002), 151. [21] A. Saha, Time-Space Non-Commutativity in Gravitational Quantum Well Scenario. — Eur. Phys. J. C 51 (2007), 199. [22] P.A. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press, USA, 1958. [23] L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, Non-Relativistic Theory. Perg- amon, Canada, 1977. [24] W. Greiner, Quantum Mechanics—An Introduction. Berlin, Springer, 1989. [25] A.D. Antia, A.N. Ikot, I.O. Akpan, and O.A. Awoga, Indian J. Phys. 87 (2013), 155. [26] S. Zaim, L. Khodja, and Y. Delenda, IJMPA 23 (2011), 4133. [27] L. Khodja and S. Zaim, IJMPA 27 (2012), No. 19, 1250100. [28] S. Zaim, A. Boudine, N. Mebarki, and M. Moumni, Rom. J. Phys. 53 (2008), Nos. 3–4, p. 445–462. [29] N. Mebarki, S. Zaim, L Khodja, and H Aissaoui, Phys. Scripta 78 (2008), 045101. [30] V. Stern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008), 061601. [31] S. Zaim and Y. Delenda, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 435 (2013), 012020. [32] A.F. Nikiforov and V.B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics. Basel, Birkhauser, 1988. 372 Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 Noncommutative Space-Time of the Relativistic Equations... [33] M.R. Setareand and O. Hatami, Commun. Theor. Phys. (Beijing) 51 (2009), 1000. [34] S. Zaim, L. Khodja, and Y. Delenda, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011), 4133. [35] C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, Quantum Field Theory, Dover Publications, New York, 2005. [36] M. Chaichian, M.M. Sheikh-Jabbari, and A. Tureanu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001), 2716. [37] J.L. Hewett, F.J. Petriello, and T.G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001), 075012. [38] S.M. Carroll, J.A. Harvey, V.A. Kostelecky, C.D. Lane, and T. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001), 141601. [39] I. Mocioiu, M. Pospelov, and R. Roiban, Phys. Lett. B 489 (2000), 390. [40] A. Akhiezer and V.B. Berestetskii, Quantum Electrodynamics. Interscience Pub- lishers, New York, 1965. [41] V.B. Berestetskii, E.M. Lifshitz, and L.P. Pitaevskii, Relativistic Quantum Theory. Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1971. [42] H.A. Bethe and E.E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms. Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1957; reprinted by Dover, New York, 2008. [43] A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1961; reprinted by Dover, New York, 1999. [44] A.F. Nikiforov and V.B. Uvarov, Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, Birkhäuser, Basel, Boston, 1988. [45] S.K. Suslov, J. Phys. B 42 (2009), 185003. [46] E. Akofor, A.P. Balachandran, A. Joseph, L. Pekowshy, B.A. Qureshi, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009), 063004. Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry, 2016, vol. 12, No. 4 373