Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space

In the paper, three types of surfaces of revolution in the Galilean 3- space are defined and studied. The construction of the well-known surface of revolution, defined as the trace of a planar curve rotated about an axis in the supporting plane of the curve, is given for the Galilean 3-space. Then w...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2018
Автори: Dede, M., Ekici, C., Goemans, W.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України 2018
Назва видання:Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/145865
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space / M. Dede, C. Ekici, W. Goemans // Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии. — 2018. — Т. 14, № 2. — С. 141-152. — Бібліогр.: 13 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-145865
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1458652019-02-02T01:23:19Z Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space Dede, M. Ekici, C. Goemans, W. In the paper, three types of surfaces of revolution in the Galilean 3- space are defined and studied. The construction of the well-known surface of revolution, defined as the trace of a planar curve rotated about an axis in the supporting plane of the curve, is given for the Galilean 3-space. Then we classify the surfaces of revolution with vanishing Gaussian curvature or vanishing mean curvature in the Galilean 3-space. У статтi визначено та дослiджено три типи поверхонь обертання у тривимiрному просторi Галiлея. Запропоновано конструкцiю поверхнi обертання у тривимiрному просторi Галiлея, визначено обертанням пласко криво навколо осi, що лежить у площинi криво . Класифiковано поверхнi обертання у тривимiрному просторi Галiлея з нульовою гауссовою кривиною та з нульовою середньою кривиною. 2018 Article Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space / M. Dede, C. Ekici, W. Goemans // Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии. — 2018. — Т. 14, № 2. — С. 141-152. — Бібліогр.: 13 назв. — англ. 1812-9471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/mag14.02.141 Mathematical Subject Classification 2010: 53A10, 53A35, 53A40. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/145865 en Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description In the paper, three types of surfaces of revolution in the Galilean 3- space are defined and studied. The construction of the well-known surface of revolution, defined as the trace of a planar curve rotated about an axis in the supporting plane of the curve, is given for the Galilean 3-space. Then we classify the surfaces of revolution with vanishing Gaussian curvature or vanishing mean curvature in the Galilean 3-space.
format Article
author Dede, M.
Ekici, C.
Goemans, W.
spellingShingle Dede, M.
Ekici, C.
Goemans, W.
Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space
Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии
author_facet Dede, M.
Ekici, C.
Goemans, W.
author_sort Dede, M.
title Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space
title_short Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space
title_full Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space
title_fullStr Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space
title_full_unstemmed Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space
title_sort surfaces of revolution with vanishing curvature in galilean 3-space
publisher Фізико-технічний інститут низьких температур ім. Б.І. Вєркіна НАН України
publishDate 2018
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/145865
citation_txt Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space / M. Dede, C. Ekici, W. Goemans // Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии. — 2018. — Т. 14, № 2. — С. 141-152. — Бібліогр.: 13 назв. — англ.
series Журнал математической физики, анализа, геометрии
work_keys_str_mv AT dedem surfacesofrevolutionwithvanishingcurvatureingalilean3space
AT ekicic surfacesofrevolutionwithvanishingcurvatureingalilean3space
AT goemansw surfacesofrevolutionwithvanishingcurvatureingalilean3space
first_indexed 2025-07-10T22:42:42Z
last_indexed 2025-07-10T22:42:42Z
_version_ 1837301622685827072
fulltext Journal of Mathematical Physics, Analysis, Geometry 2018, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 141–152 doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/mag14.02.141 Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space M. Dede, C. Ekici, and W. Goemans In the paper, three types of surfaces of revolution in the Galilean 3- space are defined and studied. The construction of the well-known surface of revolution, defined as the trace of a planar curve rotated about an axis in the supporting plane of the curve, is given for the Galilean 3-space. Then we classify the surfaces of revolution with vanishing Gaussian curvature or vanishing mean curvature in the Galilean 3-space. Key words: surface of revolution, flat surface, minimal surface, Galilean 3-space. Mathematical Subject Classification 2010: 53A10, 53A35, 53A40. 1. Introduction Together with the ruled surfaces, the surfaces of revolution were among the first studied subjects in differential geometry, besides the curves. Being the trace of a rotated planar curve, the surfaces of revolution are also to be found widely in the “real world”. The catenoid, obtained by rotating a catenary, is one of the elementary minimal surfaces. Although surfaces of revolution or rotational surfaces have been studied thoroughly for centuries, we believe we can make a modest contribution to this research area by defining and studying them in a Galilean 3-space. The geometry of this non-Euclidean space was first studied intensively by Röschel [11]. In the last decade, this space was used by several researchers as an ambient space for the well-known Euclidean concepts (see [2,3, 7, 9, 10] for more examples on special surfaces). The study of the surfaces in the Galilean 3-space can also be found in [1]. In [7], two types of surfaces of revolution in the Galilean 3-space are used as examples. It is pointed out that they are Weingarten surfaces, that is, there exists a non-trivial functional dependence between the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature. Further, no systematic studies of the curvatures of these surfaces have been found. The authors of this paper are aimed to study twisted surfaces, which are surfaces that are traced out by a planar curve on which two simultaneous rotations are performed, and hence which are a generalization of surfaces of revolution (see [6] and the references therein). We did it first in [4]. To the best of our knowledge this has not been done before. c© M. Dede, C. Ekici, and W. Goemans, 2018 https://doi.org/10.15407/mag14.02.141 142 M. Dede, C. Ekici, and W. Goemans In this paper, we first recall the necessary preliminaries on the Galilean space. Then we define three different types of surfaces of revolution in the Galilean space and study the curvature properties of these surfaces. We give the classification theorems of surfaces of revolution with vanishing Gaussian curvature or vanishing mean curvature. 2. Preliminaries For an in-depth study of the Galilean 3-space, see [11]. Here, we recall the properties that we need from this work. The Galilean 3-space G3 arises in a Cayley–Klein way by pointing out an absolute figure {ω, f, I} in the 3-dimensional real projective space. Here ω is the absolute plane, f is the absolute line and I is the fixed elliptic involution of points of f . Then the homogeneous coordinates (x0 : x1 : x2 : x3) are introduced such that ω is given by x0 = 0, f is given by x0 = x1 = 0 and I, by (0 : 0 : x2 : x3) 7→ (0 : 0 : x3 : −x2). The group of motions of G3 is a six-parameter group. Regarding this group of motions, except the absolute plane, there exist two classes of planes in G3: Euclidean planes that contain f and in which the induced metric is Euclidean and isotropic planes that do not contain f and in which the induced metric is isotropic. Also, there are four types of lines in G3: isotropic lines that intersect f , non-isotropic lines that do not intersect f , non-isotropic lines in ω and the absolute line f . In affine coordinates defined by (x0 : x1 : x2 : x3) = (1 : x1 : x2 : x3), the distance between two points Pi = (xi, yi, zi) with i ∈ {1, 2} is defined by d(P1, P2) = { |x2 − x1| if x1 6= x2,√ (y2 − y1)2 + (z2 − z1)2 if x1 = x2. The vector ~a = (x, y, z) is isotropic if x = 0 and non-isotropic otherwise. Hence, for standard coordinates (x, y, z), the x-axis is non-isotropic while the y-axis and the z-axis are isotropic. The yz-plane, x = 0, is Euclidean and the xy- plane and the xz-plane are isotropic. The Galilean scalar product of two vectors ~a = (x, y, z) and ~b = (x1, y1, z1) is defined by 〈~a,~b〉 = { xx1 if x 6= 0 or x1 6= 0, yy1 + zz1 if x = x1 = 0. The vector ~a is a unit vector if ‖~a‖ := √ 〈~a,~a〉 = 1. In [7], the Galilean cross product of two vectors ~a = (x, y, z) and ~b = (x1, y1, z1) is defined as ~a ∧~b = ∣∣∣∣∣∣ 0 e2 e3 x y z x1 y1 z1 ∣∣∣∣∣∣ . In order to define surfaces of revolution, we need the two types of rotations Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space 143 in G3. A Euclidean rotation about the non-isotropic x-axis is given byx′y′ z′  = 1 0 0 0 cos θ sin θ 0 − sin θ cos θ xy z  , where θ is the Euclidean angle. An isotropic rotation is given byx′y′ z′  = 1 0 0 θ 1 0 0 0 1 xy z +  cθ c 2θ 2 0  , where θ is the isotropic angle and c ∈ R0. Here the bundle of fixed planes is given by z = const [8]. Finally, to calculate the curvatures, we have to be able to perform patch computations for a surface in G3. If a surface in G3 is parameterized by ϕ(v1, v2) = (x(v1, v2), y(v1, v2), z(v1, v2)), then we denote the first-order derivatives for i ∈ {1, 2} by ϕ,i = ∂ϕ ∂vi (v1, v2) [2,11]. Here we will always assume that the surfaces are admissible, that is, the tangent plane is nowhere Euclidean. The unit normal vector N of the surface is defined by N = ϕ,1 ∧ ϕ,2 w where w = ‖ϕ,1 ∧ ϕ,2‖ . The coefficients of the second fundamental form are given by Lij = 〈ϕ,ijx,1 − x,ijϕ,1 x,1 , N〉 = 〈ϕ,ijx,2 − x,ijϕ,2 x,2 , N〉. (2.1) The Gaussian curvature K and the mean curvature H of the surface are defined in [11], analogously to the Euclidean space, by K = L11L22 − L2 12 w2 and 2H = 2∑ i,j=1 gijLij , (2.2) where g1 = x,2 w , g2 = −x,1 w , and gij = gigj for i, j ∈ {1, 2}. As proved in [11, Satz 19.5, p. 107], the mean curvature at the point p of a surface in G3 is the curvature of intersection of the surface with the Euclidean plane that contains the point p. 144 M. Dede, C. Ekici, and W. Goemans 3. Surfaces of revolution in the Galilean 3-space We construct a surface of revolution in the Galilean 3-space analogously to that constructed in the Euclidean 3-space. Definition 3.1. A surface of revolution in G3 is a surface that is traced out by a planar curve, the profile curve, rotated in G3. The rotation is either a Euclidean rotation about an axis in the supporting plane of the profile curve, or an isotropic rotation for which a bundle of fixed planes is chosen. Because of the existence of different kinds of planes in G3, we consider two possibilities for the supporting plane of the profile curve of a surface of revolution in G3: the profile curve lies either in a Euclidean plane, or in an isotropic plane. Since a Euclidean plane contains only isotropic vectors, while an isotropic plane contains both isotropic and non-isotropic vectors, there are three types of surfaces of revolution to be defined in G3. 3.1. Type I surfaces of revolution in G3. Without losing generality, we can assume that the profile curve α lies in the Euclidean yz-plane and it is parameterized by α(t) = (0, f(t), g(t)) where f and g are real functions. On this profile curve, we perform an isotropic rotation with c ∈ R0, for instance,1 0 0 s 1 0 0 0 1  0 f(t) g(t) +  cs c 2s 2 0  . Thus, up to a transformation, a type I surface of revolution in G3 is parame- terized by ϕ(s, t) = ( cs, f(t) + c 2 s2, g(t) ) . This type I surface of revolution is one of the two kinds of surfaces of revolution that are mentioned as examples in [7]. 3.2. Type II surfaces of revolution in G3. Now we assume, again without losing generality, that the profile curve α lies in the isotropic xy-plane and it is parameterized by α(t) = (f(t), g(t), 0) where f and g are real functions. Also on this profile curve we perform an isotropic rotation with c ∈ R0,1 0 0 0 1 0 s 0 1 f(t) g(t) 0 +  cs 0 c 2s 2  . Then, up to a transformation, a type II surface of revolution in G3 is param- eterized by ϕ(s, t) = ( f(t) + cs, g(t), sf(t) + c 2 s2 ) . As far as we know, this type of surfaces of revolution in G3 has not been defined before. Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space 145 3.3. Type III surfaces of revolution in G3. We start again with a profile curve α(t) = (f(t), g(t), 0) in the isotropic xy-plane, where f and g are real functions, but this time we perform a Euclidean rotation about the x-axis on it, 1 0 0 0 cos s sin s 0 − sin s cos s f(t) g(t) 0  . So, up to a transformation, a type III surface of revolution in G3 is parame- terized by ϕ(s, t) = (f(t), g(t) cos s,−g(t) sin s) . These type III surfaces of revolution are also used as examples in [7]. 4. Zero curvature surfaces of revolution in G3 For the three types of surfaces of revolution in G3, we calculate the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature, and we examine when they vanish. As in the Euclidean 3-space, the surfaces with vanishing Gaussian curvature are called flat and the surfaces with vanishing mean curvature are called minimal. From [11], we recall the following important theorem which classifies all minimal surfaces in G3. Theorem 4.1 ([11]). The minimal surfaces in the Galilean 3-space are cones whose vertices are on the absolute line f and the ruled surfaces of type C that are conoidal surfaces having the absolute line f as the directional line at infinity. A type C ruled surface can be parameterized as follows: ϕ(s, t) = (s, f(s), 0) + t (0, β2(s), β3(s)) where f , β2 and β3 are three times continuous differentiable real functions such that β2(s) 2 + β3(s) 2 = 1. 4.1. Zero curvature type I surfaces of revolution in G3. For a type I surface of revolution in G3, parametrized by ϕ(s, t) = ( cs, f(t) + c 2 s2, g(t) ) (4.1) with c ∈ R0, the partial derivatives of type I surfaces of revolution are obtained as ϕs = (c, cs, 0), ϕt = (0, f ′(t), g′(t)), where primes denote derivative respect to t. It follows that w = ‖ϕs ∧ ϕt‖ = |c| √ f ′(t)2 + g′(t)2. By using the partial derivatives of type I surfaces of revolution and (2), one calculates g11 = g12 = 0, g22 = 1 f ′(t)2 + g′(t)2 . (4.2) 146 M. Dede, C. Ekici, and W. Goemans From (2.1), we have the coefficients of the second fundamental form II as L11 = sgn(c) −cg′(t)√ f ′(t)2 + g′(t)2 , (4.3) L12 = 0, (4.4) L22 = sgn(c) f ′(t)g′′(t)− f ′′(t)g′(t)√ f ′(t)2 + g′(t)2 . (4.5) Here, by sgn we mean the sign function. The substituting of (4.3)–(4.5) and (4.2) into (2.2) gives K = g′(f ′′g′ − f ′g′′) c(f ′2 + g′2)2 and H = sgn(c) f ′g′′ − f ′′g′ 2(f ′2 + g′2)3/2 . Here and in the remainder of the paper we often drop the parameter of the functions f and g for reasons of readability. Since the surface is admissible, then f ′ and g′ can not be both identically zero. Further, it is immediate that the Gaussian curvature is identically zero if and only if the mean curvature is identically zero. Hence, a type I surface of revolution in G3 is flat if and only if it is minimal. Then the following classification theorem is valid. Theorem 4.2. A type I surface of revolution in the Galilean 3-space is flat or, equivalently, minimal, if and only if it is either 1) a parabolic cylinder parameterized by ϕ(s, t) = ( cs, a+ c 2 s2, g(t) ) , (4.6) 2) a part of an isotropic plane, consisting of a family of parabolas, parameterized by ϕ(s, t) = ( cs, f(t) + c 2 s2, a ) , (4.7) 3) or a parabolic cylinder parameterized by ϕ(s, t) = ( cs, f(t) + c 2 s2, af(t) + b ) . (4.8) Here a, b, c ∈ R with c 6= 0 and a 6= 0 in parameterization (4.8). Proof. From the expressions for the Gaussian curvature and the mean curva- ture, it is clear that it is sufficient that f ′g′′ − f ′′g′ = 0. If f ′ = 0 or g′ = 0, then we obtain parameterization (4.6) or (4.7), respectively. If f ′ 6= 0 and g′ 6= 0, one has f ′′ f ′ = g′′ g′ . Integrating this equation, we obtain g(t) = af(t) + b, where a 6= 0 and b are real integration constants. Therefore, the profile curve is an isotropic straight line and this leads to parameterization (4.8). Conversely, it is calculated immediately that the surfaces given by the param- eterizations in the statement are flat and minimal. Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space 147 The following corollary is immediate. Corollary 4.3. A type I surface of revolution in the Galilean 3-space is flat, or equivalently, minimal, if and only if its profile curve is an isotropic straight line. Remark 4.4. It is easy to see that in parameterization (4.6) the components satisfy y = a+ x2 2c . Similarly, in parameterization (4.8) a straightforward calcula- tion shows that y = z−b a + x2 2c . Moreover, reparameterize (4.6) such that g(t) = v. Then the resulting pa- rameterization describes a type C ruled surface ϕ(s, v) = ( cs, a+ c 2 s2, 0 ) + v(0, 0, 1). One can proceed similarly for parameterization (4.7). Also, reparameterize (4.8) such that f(t) = v, then it becomes ϕ(s, v) = ( cs, c 2 s2, b ) + v(0, 1, a). Thus, this is a conoidal surface having the absolute line f as the directional line at infinity. Hence, it is a type C ruled surface. For a drawing of a surface parameterized by parameterization (4.8), see Figure 4.1a. (a) A flat and minimal type I sur- face of revolution, parameter- ized by (4.8) with a = 1, b = c = 2 and f any function. (b) A flat and minimal type II sur- face of revolution, parameter- ized by (4.10) with a = c = 1 and b = −2. Fig. 4.1: Flat and minimal type I and type II surfaces of revolution. Remark 4.5. As mentioned in [7], since the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature of type I surfaces of revolution are the functions of one vari- able only, these type I surfaces of revolution are Weingarten surfaces. Indeed, sgn(c)c ( f ′2 + g′2 )1/2 K = 2g′H. 4.2. Zero curvature type II surfaces of revolution in G3. A type II surface of revolution in G3 parametrized by ϕ(s, t) = ( f(t) + cs, g(t), sf(t) + c 2 s2 ) 148 M. Dede, C. Ekici, and W. Goemans with c ∈ R0, using (2.2), is calculated to have the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature K = c2g′ w4 [ f(f ′g′′ − f ′′g′)− f ′2g′ ] and H = c2 2w3 [ f(f ′g′′ − f ′′g′)− f ′2g′ ] . Here w2 = f2f ′2 + c2g′2. Again, since the surface is admissible, then f ′ and g′ can not be both identically zero. Also now, the Gaussian curvature is identically zero if and only if the mean curvature is identically zero. Thus, a type II surface of revolution in G3 is flat if and only if it is minimal. The following classification theorem can be proved similarly to that for the type I surfaces of revolution. Theorem 4.6. A type II surface of revolution in the Galilean 3-space is flat or, equivalently, minimal, if and only if it is either 1) a part of an isotropic plane, consisting of a family of parabolas, parameterized by ϕ(s, t) = ( f(t) + cs, a, sf(t) + c 2 s2 ) , 2) a parabolic cylinder parameterized by ϕ(s, t) = ( a+ cs, g(t), as+ c 2 s2 ) , (4.9) 3) or a cyclic surface (parabolic sphere) parameterized by ϕ(s, t) = ( t+ cs, at2 + b, st+ c 2 s2 ) , (4.10) where a, b, c ∈ R and c 6= 0. In order to find parameterization (4.10), in Theorem 4.6 we assume that the profile curve is parameterized by arclength, then f(t) = t. Remark 4.7. A straightforward calculation shows that the components of parameterization (4.9) satisfy z = x2 2c − a2 2c . Similarly, for the components of parameterization (4.10) one sees that x2 − y a − 2cz + b a = 0. Again, reparameterize (4.9) using g(t) = v. Then we get a conoidal surface that has the absolute line f as a directional line at infinity. Hence, it is a type C ruled surface ϕ(s, v) = ( a+ cs, 0, as+ c 2 s2 ) + v(0, 1, 0). Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space 149 Similarly, parameterize (4.10), setting u = t+ cs and v = −s ( t+ c 2s ) . Then we have ϕ(u, v) = ( u, au2 + b, 0 ) + v(0, ac,−1). Remark that in parameterization (4.10) the profile curve is an isotropic circle, see [11]. In a Galilean space this parameterization represents a cyclic surface constructed analogously to a Euclidean sphere, see [12]. For a drawing of the surface, see Figure 4.1b. Remark 4.8. Also for type II surfaces of revolution, the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature are the functions of one variable only, therefore, type II surfaces of revolution are Weingarten surfaces. Indeed, wK = 2g′H. 4.3. Zero curvature type III surfaces of revolution in G3. For a type III surface of revolution in G3 given by the parametrization ϕ(s, t) = (f(t), g(t) cos s,−g(t) sin s) , using (2.2), it is calculated that K = f ′′g′ − f ′g′′ f ′3g and H = sgn(f ′g) 2g . Here f ′ should be non-zero in order to have an admissible surface. Also the function g must be non-zero of course. For these type III surfaces of revolution in G3, the flat and minimal conditions are not equivalent. Moreover, it is immediate that there do not exist minimal type III surfaces of revolution in G3. This time the proof similar to that of Theorem 4.2 leads to the classification of flat type III surfaces of revolution in G3. Theorem 4.9. A type III surface of revolution in the Galilean 3-space is flat if and only if it is either 1) a cylinder over a Euclidean circle parameterized by ϕ(s, t) = (f(t), a cos s,−a sin s) , (4.11) 2) or a circular cone with vertex (b, 0, 0) parameterized by ϕ(s, t) = (ag(t) + b, g(t) cos s,−g(t) sin s) , where a, b ∈ R with a 6= 0. Remark 4.10. We can reparameterize (4.11) by setting f(t) = v, to obtain ϕ(s, v) = (0, a cos s,−a sin s) + v(1, 0, 0). In [11], a surface of this kind is called a type B ruled surface. 150 M. Dede, C. Ekici, and W. Goemans Remark 4.11. As mentioned in [7], since the Gaussian curvature and the mean curvature of type III surfaces of revolution are the functions of one variable only, type III surfaces of revolution are Weingarten surfaces. Indeed, sgn(f ′g)f ′2K = 2(f ′′g′ − f ′g′′)H. Only for type III surfaces of revolution it is possible to determine which surfaces are of constant mean curvature. In this case, the function g is a non-zero constant function. Hence the surfaces considered are flat. Moreover, they are cylinders over Euclidean circles as in parameterization (4.11) of Theorem 4.9. 5. Conclusion and further research In this work, we defined three types of surfaces of revolution in the Galilean 3-space and studied when they are flat or minimal. For type I and type II surfaces, the flat and minimal conditions are equivalent. There do not exist minimal type III surfaces of revolution in G3. Analogously to how a Minkowski 3-space relates to a Euclidean 3-space, one has the notion of pseudo-Galilean 3-space G3 1. Without going into detail here, G3 1 is similar to G3, but the pseudo-Galilean scalar product of two vectors ~a = (x, y, z) and ~b = (x1, y1, z1) is defined by 〈~a,~b〉 = { xx1 if x 6= 0 or x1 6= 0, yy1 − zz1 if x = x1 = 0. Therefore, there exist four types of isotropic vectors ~a = (0, y, z) in G3 1: space- like vectors (if y2 − z2 > 0), timelike vectors (if y2 − z2 < 0) and two types of lightlike vectors (if y = ±z). In the same way as in a Minkowski 3-space, hy- perbolic functions have to be used instead of trigonometric functions to describe rotations. One can also define different types of surfaces of revolution in G3 1. It was done in [8] but one type seems to be lost there. Thus, this could be the subject of further research, as well as a more elaborate study of the constancy of the curvatures of surfaces of revolution in the Galilean and pseudo-Galilean 3-spaces. See also [5] and [13], where the Gauss map of two types of surfaces of revolution in G3 1 is studied. The figures of the paper are made by using VisuMath. For more information see www.visumath.be. Acknowledgment. The authors wish to thank the referee for valuable com- ments that improved the first version of the paper. Special thanks are for pointing out the existence of reference [1]. References [1] A. Artykbaev and D.D. Sokolov, Geometry in the Large in a Flat Space-Time, FAN, Tashkent, 1991 (Russian). [2] M. Dede, Tubular surfaces in Galilean space, Math. Commun. 18 (2013), 209–217. www.visumath.be Surfaces of Revolution with Vanishing Curvature in Galilean 3-Space 151 [3] M. Dede, C. Ekici, and A. Ceylan Çöken, On the parallel surfaces in Galilean space, Hacet. J. Math. Stat. 42 (2013), 605–615. [4] M. Dede, C. Ekici, W. Goemans, and Y. Ünlütürk, Twisted surfaces with vanish- ing curvature in Galilean 3-space, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 15 (2018), 1850001, 13 pp. [5] B. Divjak and Ž. Milin Šipuš, Some special surfaces in the pseudo-Galilean space, Acta Math. Hungar. 118 (2008), 209–226. [6] W. Goemans and I. Van de Woestyne, Twisted surfaces with null rotation axis in Minkowski 3-space, Results Math. 70 (2016), 81–93. [7] Ž. Milin Šipuš, Ruled Weingarten surfaces in Galilean space, Period. Math. Hungar. 56 (2008), 213–225. [8] Ž. Milin Šipuš and B. Divjak, Surfaces of constant curvature in the pseudo-Galilean space, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. (2012), Art. ID 375264, 28 pp. [9] Ž. Milin Šipuš and B. Divjak, Translation surfaces in the Galilean space, Glas. Mat. Ser. III 46(66) (2011), 455–469. [10] D. Palman, Drehzykliden des Galileischen Raumes G3, Math. Pannon. 2(1) (1991), 95–104. [11] O. Röschel, Die Geometrie des Galileischen Raumes, Bericht der Mathematisch- Statistischen Sektion in der Forschungsgesellschaft Joanneum, Bericht Nr. 256, Ha- bilitationsschrift, Leoben, 1984. [12] I.M. Yaglom, A Simple Non-Euclidean Geometry and its Physical Basis, Springer- Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1979. [13] D.W. Yoon, Surfaces of revolution in the three dimensional pseudo-Galilean space, Glas. Mat. Ser. III 48(68) (2013), 415–428. Received January 9, 2017, revised June 20, 2017. M. Dede, Kilis 7 Aralık University, Department of Mathematics, Kilis, 79000, Turkey, E-mail: mustafadede03@gmail.com C. Ekici, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Department of Mathematics-Computer, Eskişehir, 26480, Turkey, E-mail: cumali.ekici@gmail.com W. Goemans, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business, Brussels, 1000, Belgium, E-mail: wendy.goemans@kuleuven.be Поверхнi обертання з нульовою кривиною у тривимiрному просторi Галiлея M. Dede, C. Ekici, and W. Goemans У статтi визначено та дослiджено три типи поверхонь обертання у тривимiрному просторi Галiлея. Запропоновано конструкцiю поверхнi mailto:mustafadede03@gmail.com mailto:cumali.ekici@gmail.com mailto:wendy.goemans@kuleuven.be 152 M. Dede, C. Ekici, and W. Goemans обертання у тривимiрному просторi Галiлея, визначеної обертанням пла- скої кривої навколо осi, що лежить у площинi кривої. Класифiковано поверхнi обертання у тривимiрному просторi Галiлея з нульовою гауссо- вою кривиною та з нульовою середньою кривиною. Ключовi слова: поверхня обертання, пласка поверхня, мiнiмальна по- верхня, тривимiрний простiр Галiлея. Introduction Preliminaries Surfaces of revolution in the Galilean 3-space Type I surfaces of revolution in G3. Type II surfaces of revolution in G3. Type III surfaces of revolution in G3. Zero curvature surfaces of revolution in G3 Zero curvature type I surfaces of revolution in G3. Zero curvature type II surfaces of revolution in G3. Zero curvature type III surfaces of revolution in G3. Conclusion and further research