Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System

The coupling-constant metamorphosis is applied to modified extended Hamiltonians and sufficient conditions are found in order that the transformed high-degree first integral of the transformed Hamiltonian is determined by the same algorithm which computes the corresponding first integral of the orig...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2015
Автори: Chanu, C.M., Degiovanni, L., Rastelli, G.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут математики НАН України 2015
Назва видання:Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/147143
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System / C.M. Chanu, L. Degiovanni, G. Rastelli // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2015. — Т. 11. — Бібліогр.: 22 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-147143
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1471432019-02-14T01:26:13Z Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System Chanu, C.M. Degiovanni, L. Rastelli, G. The coupling-constant metamorphosis is applied to modified extended Hamiltonians and sufficient conditions are found in order that the transformed high-degree first integral of the transformed Hamiltonian is determined by the same algorithm which computes the corresponding first integral of the original extended Hamiltonian. As examples, we consider the Post-Winternitz system and the 2D caged anisotropic oscillator. 2015 Article Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System / C.M. Chanu, L. Degiovanni, G. Rastelli // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2015. — Т. 11. — Бібліогр.: 22 назв. — англ. 1815-0659 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 37J35; 70H33 DOI:10.3842/SIGMA.2015.094 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/147143 en Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications Інститут математики НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description The coupling-constant metamorphosis is applied to modified extended Hamiltonians and sufficient conditions are found in order that the transformed high-degree first integral of the transformed Hamiltonian is determined by the same algorithm which computes the corresponding first integral of the original extended Hamiltonian. As examples, we consider the Post-Winternitz system and the 2D caged anisotropic oscillator.
format Article
author Chanu, C.M.
Degiovanni, L.
Rastelli, G.
spellingShingle Chanu, C.M.
Degiovanni, L.
Rastelli, G.
Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System
Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
author_facet Chanu, C.M.
Degiovanni, L.
Rastelli, G.
author_sort Chanu, C.M.
title Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System
title_short Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System
title_full Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System
title_fullStr Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System
title_full_unstemmed Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System
title_sort extended hamiltonians, coupling-constant metamorphosis and the post-winternitz system
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
publishDate 2015
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/147143
citation_txt Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post-Winternitz System / C.M. Chanu, L. Degiovanni, G. Rastelli // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2015. — Т. 11. — Бібліогр.: 22 назв. — англ.
series Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
work_keys_str_mv AT chanucm extendedhamiltonianscouplingconstantmetamorphosisandthepostwinternitzsystem
AT degiovannil extendedhamiltonianscouplingconstantmetamorphosisandthepostwinternitzsystem
AT rastellig extendedhamiltonianscouplingconstantmetamorphosisandthepostwinternitzsystem
first_indexed 2025-07-11T01:26:56Z
last_indexed 2025-07-11T01:26:56Z
_version_ 1837311958218440704
fulltext Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 11 (2015), 094, 9 pages Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post–Winternitz System? Claudia Maria CHANU, Luca DEGIOVANNI and Giovanni RASTELLI Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Torino, Torino, via Carlo Alberto 10, Italy E-mail: claudiamaria.chanu@unito.it, luca.degiovanni@gmail.com, giovanni.rastelli@unito.it Received September 26, 2015, in final form November 16, 2015; Published online November 24, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2015.094 Abstract. The coupling-constant metamorphosis is applied to modified extended Hamil- tonians and sufficient conditions are found in order that the transformed high-degree first integral of the transformed Hamiltonian is determined by the same algorithm which com- putes the corresponding first integral of the original extended Hamiltonian. As examples, we consider the Post–Winternitz system and the 2D caged anisotropic oscillator. Key words: superintegrable systems; extended systems; coupling-constant metamorphosis 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 37J35; 70H33 This article is dedicated to Sergio Benenti, our mentor, colleague and friend. 1 Introduction Classical and quantum Hamiltonian systems depending on a rational parameter λ and admit- ting first integrals, or symmetry operators, of degree determined by λ have been recently the object of research in integrable systems theory, with a particular interest on superintegrable and separable systems. In many examples the configuration manifolds of these systems are constant- curvature Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifolds of finite dimension [1, 13, 14, 18], but some examples of non-constant-curvature manifolds are also known [11]. In a series of articles, we proposed an algorithm for the construction, given a suitable N - dimensional Hamiltonian L, of classical (N + 2)-dimensional Hamiltonians with first integrals depending on a rational parameter; this approach started from the analysis of the Jacobi– Calogero and Wolfes systems [3]. The construction is not restricted to superintegrable or se- parable systems, even if it allows to build new superintegrable systems from known ones [5]. Although it involves a privileged coordinate system, the application of the algorithm is intrinsi- cally characterized [4] and it is ultimately rooted into the geometry of the manifold (Poisson or symplectic) where L is defined, imposing conditions, as instance, on Riemannian curvature, on the geometry of warped manifolds [8] (see also, for example, [16, 20]) and on a particular type of master symmetries [4, 17]. The Hamiltonian systems admitting such an algorithmic construction are called “extensions” and many of the known Hamiltonians with high-degree first integrals depending on λ are indeed extensions of some other Hamiltonian L [7]. The algorithm consists essentially in the determina- tion of the λ-dependent first integral through the power of a differential operator generated by the Hamiltonian vector field of L, applied to some suitable function G. We stress the fact that our construction of the λ-dependent first integral does not assume integrability, separability or superintegrability of the system, differently from all other approaches, and provides a compact expression of the real first integral itself. ?This paper is a contribution to the Special Issue on Analytical Mechanics and Differential Geometry in honour of Sergio Benenti. The full collection is available at http://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA/Benenti.html mailto:claudiamaria.chanu@unito.it mailto:luca.degiovanni@gmail.com mailto:giovanni.rastelli@unito.it http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2015.094 http://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA/Benenti.html 2 C.M. Chanu, L. Degiovanni and G. Rastelli With this article we modify the algorithm in order to apply it to the Post–Winternitz (PW) system. The PW-system is a λ dependent Hamiltonian system including a Kepler–Coulomb potential term [15] originally obtained by coupling-constant metamorphosis (CCM) [9] of the Tremblay–Turbiner–Winternitz (TTW) system [21]. The CCM is a powerful tool for obtaining new integrable or superintegrable Hamiltonian systems from known ones (in particular, when applied to Stäckel separable systems it is called “Stäckel transform” [2]) and has been recently extensively employed in the study and classification of superintegrable Hamiltonian systems (see [12, 14] and references therein). It is proved in [7] that the TTW system is what we call a “modified extension” and, therefore, that its λ-dependent first integral can be computed through the power of some operator W applied to a function G. In the following, we apply the CCM to modified extensions and show in particular that the λ-dependent first integral of the PW system is equal to some power of the CCM of the operator W applied to the same function G appearing in the construction of the TTW system as extension. Therefore, even if the PW Hamiltonian cannot be written as a modified extension in the same way of the TTW system, nevertheless the same algorithm for the determination of the first integral works as well. This suggests the definition of a class of Hamiltonian systems which includes all the systems we call “extended Hamiltonians” and those systems related to them as the PW is related to the TTW. In Section 2 we recall the definition of CCM and its connection with the PW system. In Section 3 we review the theory of extended Hamiltonian systems. In Section 4, where the main results are exposed, we study the application of CCM to extended systems and the results are completed by two examples: the TTW system, from which the PW system is obtained, and the caged anisotropic oscillator. In Section 5 the results of the article are summarized, a new class of Hamiltonian systems is defined, to include extended Hamiltonians and related systems; a new direction of research is suggested. 2 Coupling-constant metamorphosis The coupling-constant metamorphosis (CCM) [12] transforms integrable or superintegrable sys- tems in new integrable or superintegrable ones, by mapping first integrals in first integrals. We take the following statement from Theorem 1 of [15] (where the CCM is called Stäckel transform), Theorem 1 of [12] and, ultimately, from [9] Theorem 1. Let us consider a Hamiltonian H = Ĥ − ẼU in canonical coordinates (qi, pi), where Ĥ(qi, pi) is independent of the arbitrary parameter Ẽ and U(qi), with an integral of the motion K (depending on Ẽ). If we define the CCM of H and K as H̃ = U−1(Ĥ − E) and K̃ = K|Ẽ=H̃ then K̃ is an integral of the motion for H̃. For example, in [15] the superintegrability of the Post–Winternitz (PW) system of Hamilto- nian HPW = p2r + 1 r2 ( p2φ + 1 4 f2 ( φ 2 )) − Q 2r , (1) where f2(x) = k2 ( α cos2(kx) + β sin2(kx) ) , is proved for k ∈ Q by writing it as result of the CCM applied to the Tremblay–Turbiner– Winternitz (TTW) system [7, 21] HTTW = p2ρ + 1 ρ2 ( p2θ + f2(θ) ) − Ẽρ2. (2) Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post–Winternitz System 3 Indeed, by applying to it the CCM, the TTW system (2) becomes a Hamiltonian system of Hamiltonian H̃ = 1 ρ2 ( p2ρ + 1 ρ2 ( p2θ + f2(θ) ) − E ) , which coincides with (1), through the coordinate change ρ = √ 2r, φ = 2θ, and by setting E = Q/2. In this example a system on the Euclidean plane is mapped into another system on the same manifold. This is not always the case: by applying the CCM to the 2D caged oscillator [10, 22] Hco = 1 2 p2y + 1 2 p2x + ω2 ( k2x2 + y2 ) + b x2 + c y2 , (3) with Ẽ = −c, we get H̃ = y2 ( 1 2 p2y + 1 2 p2x + ω2 ( k2x2 + y2 ) + b x2 − E ) , (4) which is a system on the Poincaré half-plane. 3 Extensions In [7] we show that the TTW system can be written as a modified extension. We recall that a (N + 2)-dimensional Hamiltonian H is a modified extension of the N -dimensional Hamilto- nian L if i) there exist canonical coordinates (u, pu) such that H = 1 2 p2u + f(u) + (m n )2 α(u)L, m, n ∈ N\{0}, (5) and the Hamiltonian L does not depend on (u, pu); ii) for some constants c and L0 not both vanishing, the equation X2 L(G) = −2(cL+ L0)G, (6) where XL is the Hamiltonian vector field of L, admits a solution G, such that XL(G) 6= 0; iii) the functions α and f are those given in Table 1. Then, given the operator W defined by W (Gν) = ( pu + µ ν2 γ(u)XL )2 (Gν) + δ(u)Gν , with (µ, ν) = (m,n) if m is even, (µ, ν) = (2m, 2n) if m is odd, γ and δ defined as in Table 1 and Gν being the ν-th element of the recursion G1 = G, Gν+1 = XL(G1)Gν + 1 ν G1XL(Gν), (7) we have that K = W µ 2 (Gν) is a first integral of H. 4 C.M. Chanu, L. Degiovanni and G. Rastelli Table 1. Functions involved in the modified-extensions of L. c = 0 c 6= 0 α = −γ′ = A c S2 κ(cu) f = m2 n2 L0γ 2 + f0 γ2 = m2 n2 L0A 2u2 + f0 A2u2 m2 n2 L0 T 2 κ (cu) + f0T 2 κ (cu) γ = −Au 1 Tκ(cu) δ = 2f0 γ2 = 2f0 A2u2 2f0T 2 κ (cu) In Table 1, A and κ are arbitrary constants and the functions Sκ and Tκ are the trigonometric tagged functions Sκ(x) =  sin √ κx√ κ , κ > 0, x, κ = 0, sinh √ |κ|x√ |κ| , κ < 0, Cκ(x) =  cos √ κx, κ > 0, 1, κ = 0, cosh √ |κ|x, κ < 0, Tκ(x) = Sκ(x) Cκ(x) (see [6] and [19] for a summary of their properties). We remark that • If (6) has a solution for c 6= 0, then we may assume without loss of generality L0 = 0, because L is determined up to additive constants. • In the case of natural Hamiltonians L, the possibility of finding extensions of L is strictly related to the geometry of the base manifold of L [4]. An intrinsic characterization of extended Hamiltonians H is given in [4]. • The extension H of a Hamiltonian L with k functionally independent first integrals is a Hamiltonian with k + 2 functionally independent first integrals [7]. Indeed, H itself and W µ 2 (Gν) are functionally independent first integrals of H together with L and all its functionally independent first integrals. If L is maximally superintegrable, then also H is. • The dynamical equations in (u, pu) are always separated from those in the variables (qi, pi) of L, being L a constant of motion for H. 4 Coupling-constant metamorphosis of extended Hamiltonians By Theorem 1, it follows that the CCM can be applied to any modified extension (5) by setting Ẽ = −f0, U = 1/γ2. Therefore, in this case we have Ĥ = 1 2 p2u − (m n )2 γ′L+ m2 n2 L0γ 2, (8) W = ( pu + µ ν2 γ(u)XL )2 − 2 Ẽ γ2 . (9) Moreover, the function H̃ = γ2 ( Ĥ − E ) = γ2 2 p2u − (m n )2 γ2γ′(u)L+ m2 n2 L0γ 4 − Eγ2 (10) Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post–Winternitz System 5 is the transformed Hamiltonian and K̃ = ( W µ 2 (Gν) ) |Ẽ=H̃ , the transformed first integral of H̃. A natural question is if K̃ is again given by a power of some operator applied to some function. The main result of this paper is that the answer is positive: K̃ can be computed by applying µ/2 times the operator W̃ = (W )|Ẽ=H̃ = ( pu + µ ν2 γXL )2 + 2 ( E − Ĥ ) , (11) to the same function Gν used for the determination of K. Indeed, Proposition 1. The transformed first integral K̃ of (10) is W̃ µ 2 (Gν), where W̃ = 2 ( µ ν2 γpuXL − µ2 ν2 (( cγ2 − γ′ ) L+ γ2L0 ) + E ) (12) and Gν is computed via the recursion (7). Proof. We consider the iterated application of W̃ . Being W and H̃ given by (9) and (10) respectively, we have W (H̃) = H̃W because XL(H̃) = 0. Moreover, W̃XL = XLW̃ , therefore( W µ 2 ) |Ẽ=H̃ = ( W |Ẽ=H̃ )µ 2 = W̃ µ 2 . (13) Finally, we remark that Gν does not depend on Ẽ, as well as L. The explicit form of W̃ follows by expanding (11), inserting (8) in it and by applying the formula [6] X2 L(Gν) = −2ν2(cL+ L0)Gν . � Remark 1. Let us consider the CCM of a natural 2N -dimensional Hamiltonian with a generic potential U(q1, . . . , qN , u). If Gν and L are independent from Ẽ, then the condition for ha- ving (13) is, from the proof of Proposition 1, XL(H̃) = − 1 U2 ( Ĥ − E ) XL(U) = 0, that, by requiring its validity on the whole space, is equivalent to XL(U) = 0. For L(qi, pi) such that ∂L/∂pi 6= 0, i = 1, . . . , N , the condition of above is equivalent to U(u) and we go back to the result of Proposition 1. Other situations are possible for different L. We do not consider here the reduction of the system to the submanifold Ĥ = E, i.e., H̃ = 0, and its first integrals. Remark 2. Up to a rescaling of ũ = ũ(u) such that dũ du = 1 γ(u) and pũ = γpu, the Hamiltonian (10) is of the form (5), and the operator W̃ defined by (12) becomes W̃ = 2µ ν2 pũXL + 2 µ2 ν2 δ1(ũ)L+ δ2(ũ), where the functions δi are given in Table 2. The general (i.e., independent of CCM) conditions allowing the existence of first integrals generated by such type of operator will be analysed elsewhere. 6 C.M. Chanu, L. Degiovanni and G. Rastelli Table 2. Functions δ1 and δ2. c 6= 0, κ 6= 0, c 6= 0, κ = 0, c = 0, L0 6= 0 δ1 cκ ( 1 + Cκ(cu)2 ) 1− Cκ(cu)2 = cκ tanh(κcũ) 2 cu2 = 1 ũ A δ2 2E + L0µ 2κ ν2 ( 1 tanh(cκũ) − 1 ) 2E + L0µ 2κ ν2cũ 2E + 2µ 2 ν2 L0A 2 e2Aũ 4.1 Example 1: the TTW system In [7] it is shown that the TTW system (2) is a modified extension. Indeed, the extension of the Hamiltonian L = 1 2 p2ψ + c1 + c2 cosψ sin2 ψ , (14) (satisfying (6) for c = 1, L0 = 0 and G = pψ sinψ) for κ = 0, that is for γ = 1/u, is H = 1 2 p2u + m2 n2u2 ( 1 2 p2ψ + c1 + c2 cosψ sin2 ψ ) + f0u 2. (15) The rescaling u = ρ, ψ = 2kθ, the change of parameters m n = k, c1 = α+ β, c2 = β − α, (16) and the position Ẽ = −2f0, transform (15) into the Hamiltonian HTTW of (2) multiplied by 2. The PW Hamiltonian (1), instead, is not a modified extension, because the Kepler–Coulomb term Q 2r cannot be included in the form of f given in Table 1. By applying the CCM based on Ẽ = −f0 as in Theorem 1 to the Hamiltonian (15), we get H̃ = 1 2u2 p2u + m2 n2u4 ( 1 2 p2ψ + c1 + c2 cosψ sin2 ψ ) − E u2 , (17) and, by performing the rescaling u2 = 2r, we obtain H̃ = 1 2 p2r + m2 4n2r2 ( 1 2 p2ψ + c1 + c2 cosψ sin2 ψ ) − E 2r , (18) which is, after (16), and the rescaling ψ = 2kφ together with the change of parameters Q = 2E, one half of the Hamiltonian (1). Then, the operator generating first integrals of (17) for any rational m/n is W̃ = 2 ( µ ν2u puXL − µ2 ν2u2 L+ E ) , with (µ, ν) = (m,n) for m even, (µ, ν) = (2m, 2n) for m odd and where XL is the Hamiltonian vector field of (14). The function Gν is recursively determined by G1 = (sinψ)pψ, Gν+1 = XL(G1)Gν + 1 ν G1XL(Gν). By the rescaling u2 = 2r, we get the operator generating first integrals for (18): W̃ = 2µ ν2 prXL − µ2 ν2r L+ 2E. Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post–Winternitz System 7 4.2 Example 2: the caged anisotropic oscillator In order to write the Hamiltonian on the Poincaré half-plane (4) as the CCM of a modified extension, we need to express the caged oscillator Hamiltonian (3) as a modified extension. From Section 3, we know that the expression of a modified extension in a plane when c = 0 is Hm,n = 1 2 p2u − m2 n2 γ′L+ m2 n2 L0γ 2 + f0 γ2 , (19) where γ = −Au. From [7] we know that the most general one-dimensional natural Hamiltonian L(pq, q) admitting an extension for c = 0, with G = (a1q + a2)pq, is L = 1 2 p2q + L0 4a21 (a1q + a2) 2 + c1 (a1q + a2)2 + c2, being A, ai, ci, L0 real constants. By extending the Hamiltonian L into (19), we can write the CCM of Hm,n according to (10), obtaining H̃m,n = γ2 ( 1 2 p2u − m2 n2 γ′L+ m2 n2 L0γ 2 − E′ ) . (20) By comparing (4) with (20) we obtain that the kinetic terms coincide for u = y, γ = −y, q = m n x+ x0. The choice of x0 = −a2 a1 allows to write a1q + a2 = a1 m n x and, consequently, we have the identifications m2 n2 = 4k2, L0 = ω2 4k2 , c1 = a21b, E′ = E + 4c2k 2. Therefore, the first integral is K = W̃ µ 2Gν , where W̃ = −2µ ν2 ypyXL − 8k2 − 4ω2y2 + 2E + 8c2k 2, L = 1 8k2 p2x + ω2 4 x2 + b 4k2x2 + c2, with (µ, ν) = (m,n) for m even, (µ, ν) = (2m, 2n) for m odd, and Gν given by the recursion [7] G1 = a1xpx, Gn+1 = XL(G1)Gn + 1 n G1XL(Gn). We remark that other choices of rescaling and changes of parameters are possible, leading to different (but essentially equivalent) L and W̃ . 5 Conclusions In this article we proved that, for any modified extension, there exists a specific CCM of it which maintains the most distinctive property of an extension: the determination of a first integral via powers of an operator applied to a suitable function. This fact suggests the definition of 8 C.M. Chanu, L. Degiovanni and G. Rastelli a new class of Hamiltonian systems including the Post–Winternitz system as well as all extended Hamiltonian systems. In [8] we introduced the idea of warped product of Hamiltonian systems. Given two symplec- tic, or Poisson, manifolds M and N with Hamiltonians HM and HN , we consider on M × N , endowed with the product of the symplectic or Poisson structures of M and N , the Hamiltonian H = αHM + βHN , where α and β are functions on M × N and we call it the “warped product” of HM and HN . If HM , HN are natural Hamiltonians, M , N are cotangent bundles with Riemannian man- ifolds BM , BN as base manifolds and α, β are functions of the product BM × BN , then the metric tensor of H is the standard warped product of the metrics on BM , BN . All extended Hamiltonian systems, together with their CCM considered in this paper, are clearly the warped product of two Hamiltonians: one depending on (u, pu) solely, the other being L. Indeed, the symplectic structure we are using on H is simply the product of the lower- dimensional canonical symplectic structures. Therefore, we may imagine a class of Hamiltonian systems of “warped-power” type determined as follows • their Hamiltonian H is the warped product of a finite number of other Hamiltonians, • H admits a constant of the motion determined by the power of an operator applied to some suitable function defined on the same domain of H. Such a class includes all the systems we call “extensions of Hamiltonian systems”, together with their CCM as described in this paper, and is naturally parametrized by a natural number at least: the power of the operator generating the first integral. Finally, Remark 2 suggests a new direction of research, by proposing an alternative form of the operator involved in the extension procedure. References [1] Borisov A.V., Kilin A.A., Mamaev I.S., Superintegrable system on a sphere with the integral of higher degree, Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 14 (2009), 615–620. [2] Boyer C.P., Kalnins E.G., Miller Jr. W., Stäckel-equivalent integrable Hamiltonian systems, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 17 (1986), 778–797. [3] Chanu C., Degiovanni L., Rastelli G., Superintegrable three-body systems on the line, J. Math. Phys. 49 (2008), 112901, 10 pages, arXiv:0802.1353. [4] Chanu C.M., Degiovanni L., Rastelli G., Generalizations of a method for constructing first integrals of a class of natural Hamiltonians and some remarks about quantization, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 343 (2012), 012101, 15 pages, arXiv:1111.0030. [5] Chanu C.M., Degiovanni L., Rastelli G., Superintegrable extensions of superintegrable systems, SIGMA 8 (2012), 070, 12 pages, arXiv:1210.3126. [6] Chanu C.M., Degiovanni L., Rastelli G., Extensions of Hamiltonian systems dependent on a rational pa- rameter, J. Math. Phys. 55 (2014), 122703, 11 pages, arXiv:1310.5690. [7] Chanu C.M., Degiovanni L., Rastelli G., The Tremblay–Turbiner–Winternitz system as extended Hamilto- nian, J. Math. Phys. 55 (2014), 122701, 8 pages, arXiv:1404.4825. [8] Chanu C.M., Degiovanni L., Rastelli G., Warped product of Hamiltonians and extensions of Hamiltonian systems, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 597 (2015), 012024, 10 pages. [9] Hietarinta J., Grammaticos B., Dorizzi B., Ramani A., Coupling-constant metamorphosis and duality be- tween integrable Hamiltonian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984), 1707–1710. [10] Kalnins E.G., Kress J.M., Miller Jr. W., Tools for verifying classical and quantum superintegrability, SIGMA 6 (2010), 066, 23 pages, arXiv:1006.0864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S156035470906001X http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0517057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0517057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3009575 http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.1353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/343/1/012101 http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2012.070 http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.3126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4904452 http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.5690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4903508 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.4825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/597/1/012024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1707 http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2010.066 http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.0864 Extended Hamiltonians, Coupling-Constant Metamorphosis and the Post–Winternitz System 9 [11] Kalnins E.G., Kress J.M., Miller Jr. W., Superintegrability in a non-conformally-flat space, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 (2013), 022002, 12 pages, arXiv:1211.1452. [12] Kalnins E.G., Miller Jr. W., Post S., Coupling constant metamorphosis andNth-order symmetries in classical and quantum mechanics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 (2010), 035202, 20 pages, arXiv:0908.4393. [13] Maciejewski A.J., Przybylska M., Yoshida H., Necessary conditions for classical super-integrability of a cer- tain family of potentials in constant curvature spaces, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 (2010), 382001, 15 pages, arXiv:1004.3854. [14] Miller Jr. W., Post S., Winternitz P., Classical and quantum superintegrability with applications, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 (2013), 423001, 97 pages, arXiv:1309.2694. [15] Post S., Winternitz P., An infinite family of superintegrable deformations of the Coulomb potential, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 (2010), 222001, 11 pages, arXiv:1003.5230. [16] Rajaratnam K., McLenaghan R.G., Killing tensors, warped products and the orthogonal separation of the Hamilton–Jacobi equation, J. Math. Phys. 55 (2014), 013505, 27 pages, arXiv:1404.3161. [17] Rañada M.F., Master symmetries, non-Hamiltonian symmetries and superintegrability of the generalized Smorodinsky–Winternitz system, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 (2012), 145204, 13 pages. [18] Rañada M.F., The Tremblay–Turbiner–Winternitz system on spherical and hyperbolic spaces: superinte- grability, curvature-dependent formalism and complex factorization, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47 (2014), 165203, 9 pages, arXiv:1403.6266. [19] Rañada M.F., Santander M., Superintegrable systems on the two-dimensional sphere S2 and the hyperbolic plane H2, J. Math. Phys. 40 (1999), 5026–5057. [20] Tashiro Y., Complete Riemannian manifolds and some vector fields, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 117 (1965), 251–275. [21] Tremblay F., Turbiner A.V., Winternitz P., An infinite family of solvable and integrable quantum systems on a plane, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42 (2009), 242001, 10 pages, arXiv:0904.0738. [22] Verrier P.E., Evans N.W., A new superintegrable Hamiltonian, J. Math. Phys. 49 (2008), 022902, 8 pages, arXiv:0712.3677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/2/022002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/2/022002 http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/43/3/035202 http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.4393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/43/38/382001 http://arxiv.org/abs/1004.3854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/42/423001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/42/423001 http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.2694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/43/22/222001 http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.5230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4861707 http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.3161 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/45/14/145204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/47/16/165203 http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.6266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.533014 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1994206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/24/242001 http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.0738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2840465 http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3677 1 Introduction 2 Coupling-constant metamorphosis 3 Extensions 4 Coupling-constant metamorphosis of extended Hamiltonians 4.1 Example 1: the TTW system 4.2 Example 2: the caged anisotropic oscillator 5 Conclusions References