A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator

We demonstrate how a known Whittaker function integral identity arises from the t=0 and q→1 limit of the Macdonald polynomial eigenrelation satisfied by Noumi's q-integral operator.

Збережено в:

Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:	2015
Автори:	Borodin, A., Corwin, I., Remenik, D.
Формат:	Стаття
Мова:	English
Опубліковано:	Інститут математики НАН України 2015
Назва видання:	Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
Онлайн доступ:	http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/147165
Теги:	Додати тег Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:	Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:	A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator / A. Borodin, I. Corwin, D. Remenik // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2015. — Т. 11. — Бібліогр.: 13 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

id	irk-123456789-147165
record_format	dspace
spelling	irk-123456789-1471652019-02-14T01:24:58Z A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator Borodin, A. Corwin, I. Remenik, D. We demonstrate how a known Whittaker function integral identity arises from the t=0 and q→1 limit of the Macdonald polynomial eigenrelation satisfied by Noumi's q-integral operator. 2015 Article A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator / A. Borodin, I. Corwin, D. Remenik // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2015. — Т. 11. — Бібліогр.: 13 назв. — англ. 1815-0659 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 05E05; 33D52; 33D52; 82B23 DOI:10.3842/SIGMA.2015.098 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/147165 en Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications Інститут математики НАН України
institution	Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection	DSpace DC
language	English
description	We demonstrate how a known Whittaker function integral identity arises from the t=0 and q→1 limit of the Macdonald polynomial eigenrelation satisfied by Noumi's q-integral operator.
format	Article
author	Borodin, A. Corwin, I. Remenik, D.
spellingShingle	Borodin, A. Corwin, I. Remenik, D. A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
author_facet	Borodin, A. Corwin, I. Remenik, D.
author_sort	Borodin, A.
title	A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator
title_short	A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator
title_full	A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator
title_fullStr	A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator
title_full_unstemmed	A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator
title_sort	classical limit of noumi's q-integral operator
publisher	Інститут математики НАН України
publishDate	2015
url	http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/147165
citation_txt	A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator / A. Borodin, I. Corwin, D. Remenik // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2015. — Т. 11. — Бібліогр.: 13 назв. — англ.
series	Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
work_keys_str_mv	AT borodina aclassicallimitofnoumisqintegraloperator AT corwini aclassicallimitofnoumisqintegraloperator AT remenikd aclassicallimitofnoumisqintegraloperator AT borodina classicallimitofnoumisqintegraloperator AT corwini classicallimitofnoumisqintegraloperator AT remenikd classicallimitofnoumisqintegraloperator
first_indexed	2025-07-11T01:30:45Z
last_indexed	2025-07-11T01:30:45Z
_version_	1837312192317227008
fulltext	Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 11 (2015), 098, 7 pages A Classical Limit of Noumi’s q-Integral Operator Alexei BORODIN †1, Ivan CORWIN †2†3†4 and Daniel REMENIK †5 †1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mathematics, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA E-mail: borodin@math.mit.edu †2 Columbia University, Department of Mathematics, 2990 Broadway, New York, NY 10027, USA E-mail: ivan.corwin@gmail.com †3 Clay Mathematics Institute, 10 Memorial Blvd. Suite 902, Providence, RI 02903, USA †4 Institut Henri Poincaré, 11 Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France †5 Departamento de Ingenieŕıa Matemática and Centro de Modelamiento Matemático, Universidad de Chile, Beauchef 851, Torre Norte, Santiago, Chile E-mail: dremenik@dim.uchile.cl Received September 03, 2015, in final form December 01, 2015; Published online December 03, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2015.098 Abstract. We demonstrate how a known Whittaker function integral identity arises from the t = 0 and q → 1 limit of the Macdonald polynomial eigenrelation satisfied by Noumi’s q-integral operator. Key words: Macdonald polynomials; Whittaker functions 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 05E05; 33D52; 33D52; 82B23 The class-one glN -Whittaker functions are of great interest in representation theory, inte- grable systems and number theory (see Gerasimov, Lebedev and Oblezin [8] and references therein). Givental [5, 9] gave the following integral representation, which we will take as our definition: ψλ(x) = ∫ RN(N−1)/2 N−1∏ k=1 k∏ i=1 dxk,i e Fλ(X), where λ = (λ1, . . . , λN ) ∈ CN , x = (x1, . . . , xN ), X = (xk,i : 1 ≤ i ≤ k ≤ N), xN,i = xi, and Fλ(X) = i N∑ k=1 λk ( k∑ i=1 xk,i − k−1∑ i=1 xk−1,i ) − N−1∑ k=1 k∑ i=1 ( exk,i−xk+1,i + exk+1,i+1−xk,i ) . Whittaker functions satisfy the following two integral identities. Proposition 1. Suppose u > 0 and λ, ν ∈ CN with <(λi + νj) > 0 for all 1 ≤ i, j ≤ N . Then ∫ RN dx e−ue x1 ψ−iλ(x)ψ−iν(x) = u − N∑ j=1 (λj+νj) ∏ 1≤i,j≤N Γ(λi + νj), and ∫ RN dx e−ue −xN ψiλ(x)ψiν(x) = u − N∑ j=1 (λj+νj) ∏ 1≤i,j≤N Γ(λi + νj). mailto:borodin@math.mit.edu mailto:ivan.corwin@gmail.com mailto:dremenik@dim.uchile.cl http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2015.098 2 A. Borodin, I. Corwin and D. Remenik The first of these identities is due to Stade [13], while the second follows readily by appealing to the fact that ψλ(x) = ψ−λ(x′) where x′ = −xN−i+1. They also follow from [12, Corollaries 3.6 and 3.7] once one observes that the multiplicative Whittaker functions ΨN λ (x) in [12] are related to those defined above via ΨN λ (x) = ψiλ(log x), with log x = (log x1, . . . , log xN ). The Plancherel theory for Whittaker functions (see, for example, [2, Section 4.1.1]) implies that for x, y ∈ RN ,∫ RN dλψ−λ(x)ψλ(y)mN (λ) = δ(x− y), where the Sklyanin measure mN (λ) is defined as mN (λ) = 1 (2π)NN ! N∏ i,j=1 i 6=j 1 Γ(iξi − iξj) , and δ(x− y) is the Dirac delta function for x = y. Using the above identity one readily observes the equivalence of the results of Proposition 1 and the following two eigenrelations. The integral operator on the right-hand side of (1) is referred to as a dual Baxter operator by Gerasimov, Lebedev and Oblezin [6], wherein the below result is demonstrated in a rather different manner than that followed in this present work. Proposition 2. For u > 0 and Im(wi) < 0, 1 ≤ i ≤ N , e−ue −x1 ψ−w(x) = ∫ RN dξ mN (ξ)u i N∑ k=1 (wi+ξi) ∏ 1≤i,j≤N Γ(−iξi − iwj)ψξ(x), (1) and e−ue −xN ψw(x) = ∫ RN dξ mN (ξ)u i N∑ k=1 (wi+ξi) ∏ 1≤i,j≤N Γ(−iξi − iwj)ψ−ξ(x). (2) The aim of this note is to explain how the eigenrelation in (2) arises as the q → 1 limit of a certain eigenrelation involving Noumi’s q-integral operator and the Macdonald symmetric polynomials. Definition 3. The q-shift operator Tq,zi acts by mapping function f(z1, . . . , zi, . . . , zN ) 7→ f(z1, . . . , qzi, . . . , zN ). For u ∈ C of suitably small modulus, Noumi’s q-integral operator Nu acts on the space of analytic functions in z1, . . . , zN as Nζ = ∑ ν∈(Z≥0)N ζ \|ν\| ∏ 1≤i<j≤N qνizi − qνjzj zi − zj N∏ i,j=1 (tzi/zj ; q)νi (qzi/zj ; q)νi N∏ i=1 (Tq,zi) νi . Here \|ν\| = ν1 + · · ·+ νN . This operator as well as the below eigenrelation it satisfies is due to M. Noumi. It first appeared in [4, Proposition 3.24], and further details regarding its derivation are forthcoming in [11]. It was subsequently discussed in [3, Section 4] and a proof of the eigenrelation was given in an appendix therein by E. Rains. The Macdonald q-difference operators are like- wise diagonal in the basis of Macdonald symmetric polynomials with eigenvalues of the form er ( qλ1tN−1, qλ2tN−2, . . . , qλN ) , with er the rth elementary symmetric polynomial. While these A Classical Limit of Noumi’s q-Integral Operator 3 difference operators must commute with the Noumi q-integral operator there is presently no easy way to express them through each other. Recall the Macdonald symmetric polynomial Pλ(z) indexed by partitions λ and symmetric in the z-variables with coefficients which are rational functions of two auxiliary parameters q, t ∈ [0, 1) (see, for example, [2, 10]). We have the following eigenrelation. Proposition 4. Noumi’s q-integral operator is diagonal in the basis of Macdonald symmetric polynomials so that for any partition λ, ( NζPλ ) (z1, . . . , zN ) = ∏ 1≤i≤N ( qλitN+1−iζ; q ) ∞( qλitN−iζ; q ) ∞ Pλ(z1, . . . , zN ). (3) This eigenrelation can be understood as a formal power series identity in ζ or as a convergent series identity, provided \|ζ\| is suitably small. The remainder of this note will be devoted to showing how when t = 0 and q → 1 under particular scaling this eigenrelation yields that of (2). We will proceed formally. Various uniform estimates would be necessary for this particular route to yield a rigorous derivation of (2). Since this identity has already been proved through other means, we do not provide these necessary details. Our derivation has two steps. The first takes the termwise limit of the Noumi operator, yielding the eigenrelation (5). It is this step which we do not fully justify. The second step uses residue calculus to rewrite the resulting summation as the claimed contour integral formula. From here on set t = 0 and take the following scalings q = e−ε, λk = (N − 2k + 1)ε−1 log ( ε−1 ) + ε−1xk, zk = eiεwk , ζ = −uεN . Furthermore, define the following scaled version of t = 0 Macdonald symmetric polynomial ψεw(x) = ε N(N−1) 2 + N(N−1) 2 A(ε)Pλ(z), A(ε) = −1 6π 2ε−1 − ε−1 log(ε/2π). Note, at t = 0, the Macdonald symmetric polynomial has been identified with the class-one q-Whittaker functions, as defined in the work of Gerasimov, Lebedev and Oblezin [7] (the term “q-Whittaker function” is used to denote different objects by different authors). Since we will not be proving a theorem, let us summarize here the result we will formally demonstrate. Under the above scaling, assume that a sequence of symmetric function f ε(z) have a limit as ε→ 0 to some f̃(w). Then, formally we will show that( Nζf ε ) (z)→ ( Ñ−uf̃ ) (w), where the limiting operator Ñu is defined in (4) and is identified with the dual Baxter operator through Lemma 5. This is the key result of this paper. Step 1. Let us consider how (3) scales as ε→ 0. The right-hand side at t = 0 equals 1 (qλN ζ; q)∞ Pλ(z1, . . . , zN ). Observe that from the convergence of the eq-exponential to the usual exponential (see [2, Sec- tion 3.1.1]), 1 (ζqλN ; q)∞ −→ e−ue −xN . 4 A. Borodin, I. Corwin and D. Remenik In [8, Theorem 3.1], it was explained how t = 0 Macdonald polynomials (i.e., q-Whittaker functions) converge to Whittaker functions. Certain tail estimates necessary for that argument were further provided in [2, Theorem 4.1.7]. The resulting convergence holds that ψεw(x) −→ ψw(x). Note that in both [8] and [2] there was a mistake – the prefactor for A(ε) in the definition of ψεw(x) should be N(N−1) 2 (as above) whereas in [8, Theorem 3.1] and [2, Theorem 4.1.7] it was written as (N−1)(N+2) 2 . Let us briefly explain where this error came from (in reference to the proof of [2, Theorem 4.1.7]). Comparing equation (3.8) with (4.25) we find that in (4.25) the term ∆ε(x`) should actually be ∆ε(x`+1) (here `+1 = N). This error resulted in neglecting `+1 extra factors of eA(ε) which jives with the difference between the incorrect and correct powers (N−1)(N+2) 2 − N(N−1) 2 = N . Turning to the left-hand side, let us consider how each term in the summation scales: qνizi − qνjzj zi − zj = e−ενi+iεwi − e−ενj+iεwj eiεwi − eiεwj −→ i(νj − νi) + (wj − wi) wj − wi , 1 (qzi/zj ; q)νi = 1 1− e−ε+iε(wi−wj) 1 1− e−2ε+iε(wi−wj) · · · 1 1− e−νiε+iε(wi−wj) = 1 ε(1− i(wi − wj)) · · · 1 ε(νi − i(wi − wj)) + l.o.t. = ε−νi Γ(1 + i(wj − wi)) Γ(1 + νi + i(wj − wi)) + l.o.t., where l.o.t. denotes lower order terms in ε. Also note that N∏ i=1 T νiq,ziPλ(z) = Pλ ( eiεw1−εν1 , . . . , eiεwN−ενN ) = N∏ i=1 Sνii,wiψ ε w(x)ε− N(N−1) 2 − (N+2)(N−1) 2 A(ε), where the effect of Sa,wi is to shift wi by a. Putting all of this together we deduce that Ñu = ∑ ν∈(Z≥0)N (u)\|ν\| ∏ i<j wj − wi + i(νj − νi) wj − wi ∏ i,j Γ(1 + i(wj − wi)) Γ(1 + νi + i(wj − wi)) N∏ i=1 (Si,wi) νi (4) satisfies the eigenrelation Ñ−uψw(x) = e−ue −xN ψw(x). (5) This completes the first step of our derivation. As we already mentioned, various estimates are needed in order to turn this into a rigorous proof. Step 2. The purpose of the second step is to show how Ñ−u can be rewritten in terms of contour integrals through residue calculus. We will obtain this as a consequence of the following slightly more general result: Lemma 5. Let a be a positive real number and consider a symmetric function f defined on the set {w ∈ CN : Im(wi) ≤ −a, i = 1, . . . , N} which is bounded and analytic in each variable in this set. Then( Ñ−uf ) (w) = ∫ (a+iR)N dξ sN (ξ)u ∑ i(iwi−ξi) N∏ i,j=1 Γ(ξj − iwi)f(−iξ) (6) for u > 0, where sN is the following variant of the Sklyanin measure: sN (ξ1, . . . , ξN ) = 1 (2πi)NN ! N∏ i,j=1 i 6=j 1 Γ(ξi − ξj) . A Classical Limit of Noumi’s q-Integral Operator 5 To see that this implies the desired result, let f(w) = ψw(x) and observe that f satisfies the necessary boundedness thanks to [2, Lemma 4.1.19]. Making the change of variables ξ 7→ −iξ and combining (6) with (5) we easily deduce (2). Proof of Lemma 5. We will prove the result by expanding the integral on the right-hand side of (6) into residues and matching the result with the summation on the right-hand side of (4). For i, j = 1, . . . , N , the integrand on the right-hand side of (6) has singularities coming from the factor Γ(ξj − iwi) at each point of the form ξj = iwi − ν for ν ∈ Z≥0 (where Z≥0 stands for the set of non-negative integers). By shifting each contour to the left to −∞ we will pick up each of these singularities, and the result is that the integral will equal the sum of the associated residues (The fact that the contours of integration can be deformed in this way follows from our assumption on f and the known asymptotics of the Gamma function, which give c1e −π 2 \|Im(z)\|\|Im(z)\|η ≤ \|Γ(z)\| ≤ c2e −π 2 \|Im(z)\|\|Im(z)\|η for Re(z) in some finite interval and some c1, c2 > 0 and η ∈ R, see, e.g., [1, (6.1.45)]; observe also that, thanks to the factor u ∑ i(iwi−ξi), there is no pole at −∞). Each of these residues is evaluated at a point of the form (ξ1, . . . , ξN ) = (iwm1 − ν1, . . . , iwmN − νN ) for some (m1, . . . ,mN ) ∈ {1, . . . , N}N and νi ≥ 0 for i = 1, . . . , N , so the right-hand side of (6) equals 1 N ! ∑ (m1,...,mN )∈{1,...,N}N ∑ ν∈(Z≥0)N u ∑ i(iwi−iwmi+νi) (−1) ∑ i νi∏ i νi! f(wm1 + iν1, . . . , wmN + iνN ) × ∏ i 6=j Γ(iwmj − νj − iwi) ∏ i 6=j 1 Γ(iwmi − νi − iwmj + νj) . If mi = mj for some i 6= j then the associated term in the above sum equals 0. In fact, such a term has a factor of the form Γ(νj − νi)−1Γ(νi − νj)−1, which equals 0 because νj − νi ∈ Z. Hence the above sum is restricted to the case where mi = σ(i) for some σ ∈ SN and equals 1 N ! ∑ σ∈SN ∑ ν∈(Z≥0)N u ∑ i(iwi−iwσ(i)+νi) (−1) ∑ i νi∏ i νi! f(wσ(1) + iν1, . . . , wσ(N) + iνN ) × N∏ i=1 ∏ j 6=i Γ(iwσ(j) − νj − iwi))∏ i<j Γ(iwσ(i) − νi − iwσ(j) + νj))Γ(iwσ(j) − νj − iwσ(i) + νi)) . By the symmetry of f , the sum in ν does not depend on σ ∈ SN , and therefore if we choose σ to be the identity we deduce that the sum equals ∑ ν∈(Z≥0)N (−u) ∑ i νi 1∏ i νi! f(w + iν) ∏ i 6=j Γ(i(wj − wi)− νj))∏ i<j Γ(i(wi − wj)− νi + νj)Γ(i(wj − wi)− νj + νi) . To complete the argument matching the right-hand side of (6) to the right-hand side of (4) it suffices to show that 1∏ i νi! ∏ i 6=j Γ(i(wj − wi)− νj))∏ i<j Γ(i(wi − wj)− νi + νj)Γ(i(wj − wi)− νj + νi) = ∏ i<j wj − wi + i(νj − νi) wj − wi ∏ i,j Γ(1 + i(wj − wi)) Γ(1 + νi + i(wj − wi)) . 6 A. Borodin, I. Corwin and D. Remenik Observe first of all that in the last product on the right-hand side of the above equation, the terms i = j equal Γ(1 + νi) −1 = 1/(νi!). Therefore if we write ri = iwi, we need to show that∏ i 6=j Γ(rj − ri − νj)) Γ(ri − rj − νi + νj) = ∏ i<j rj − ri − νj + νi rj − ri Γ(1 + ri − rj)Γ(1 + rj − ri) Γ(1 + νj + ri − rj)Γ(1 + νi + rj − ri) . (7) Recalling Euler’s reflection formula Γ(1− z)Γ(z) = π sin(πz) (8) and the fact that zΓ(z) = Γ(1 + z) we have Γ(1 + ri − rj)Γ(1 + rj − ri) rj − ri = π sin(π(rj − ri)) and rj − ri − νj + νi Γ(1 + νj + ri − rj)Γ(1 + νi + rj − ri) = sin(π(rj − ri − νj + νi)) π Γ(1− rj + ri + νj − νi) Γ(1 + νj + ri − rj) Γ(1 + rj − ri − νj + νi) Γ(1 + νi + rj − ri) . Using these identities and the fact that sin(π(a+k)) = (−1)k sin(πa), the right-hand side of (7) becomes∏ i<j (−1)νi−νj ∏ i 6=j Γ(1− rj + ri + νj − νi) Γ(1 + νj + ri − rj) , and hence (7) is equivalent to∏ i<j (−1)νi−νj ∏ i 6=j Γ(1− ri + rj + νi − νj) Γ(1 + νj + ri − rj) Γ(ri − rj − νi + νj) Γ(rj − ri − νj) = 1. But using (8) again the left-hand side equals∏ i<j (−1)νi−νj ∏ i 6=j π sin(π(ri − rj − νi + νj)) sin(π(rj − ri − νj)) π = (−1)κ with κ = ∑ i<j (νi − νj) + ∑ i 6=j (νi − 2νj) = n∑ m=1 (n− 2m+ 1)νm − (n− 1) n∑ m=1 νm = 2 n∑ m=1 (1−m)νm, which finishes our derivation since κ is even. � Acknowledgements We appreciate helpful comments from our referees. AB was partially supported by the NSF grant DMS-1056390. IC was partially supported by the NSF through DMS-1208998 as well as by the Clay Mathematics Institute through the Clay Research Fellowship, by the Institute Henri Poincaré through the Poincaré Chair, and by the Packard Foundation through a Packard Foundation Fellowship. DR was partially supported by Fondecyt Grant 1120309, by Conicyt Basal-CMM, and by Programa Iniciativa Cient́ıfica Milenio grant number NC130062 through Nucleus Millenium Stochastic Models of Complex and Disordered Systems. A Classical Limit of Noumi’s q-Integral Operator 7 References [1] Abramowitz M., Stegun I.A., Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, Vol. 55, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1964. [2] Borodin A., Corwin I., Macdonald processes, Probab. Theory Related Fields 158 (2014), 225–400, arXiv:1111.4408. [3] Borodin A., Corwin I., Gorin V., Shakirov S., Observables of Macdonald processes, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., to appear, arXiv:1306.0659. [4] Feigin B., Hashizume K., Hoshino A., Shiraishi J., Yanagida S., A commutative algebra on degenerate CP1 and Macdonald polynomials, J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009), 095215, 42 pages, arXiv:0904.2291. [5] Gerasimov A., Kharchev S., Lebedev D., Oblezin S., On a Gauss–Givental representation of quantum Toda chain wave function, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2006 (2006), 96489, 23 pages, math.RT/0505310. [6] Gerasimov A., Lebedev D., Oblezin S., Baxter operator and Archimedean Hecke algebra, Comm. Math. Phys. 284 (2008), 867–896, arXiv:0706.3476. [7] Gerasimov A., Lebedev D., Oblezin S., On q-deformed gl`+1-Whittaker function III, Lett. Math. Phys. 97 (2011), 1–24, arXiv:0805.3754. [8] Gerasimov A., Lebedev D., Oblezin S., On a classical limit of q-deformed Whittaker functions, Lett. Math. Phys. 100 (2012), 279–290, arXiv:1101.4567. [9] Givental A., Stationary phase integrals, quantum Toda lattices, flag manifolds and the mirror conjecture, in Topics in Singularity Theory, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, Vol. 180, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997, 103–115, alg-geom/9612001. [10] Macdonald I.G., Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1979, oxford Mathematical Monographs. [11] Noumi M., Sano A., An infinite family of higher-order difference operators that commute with Ruijsenaars operators of type A, in preparation. [12] O’Connell N., Seppäläinen T., Zygouras N., Geometric RSK correspondence, Whittaker functions and sym- metrized random polymers, Invent. Math. 197 (2014), 361–416, arXiv:1210.5126. [13] Stade E., Archimedean L-factors on GL(n) ×GL(n) and generalized Barnes integrals, Israel J. Math. 127 (2002), 201–219, arXiv:1102.2457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00440-013-0482-3 http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/tran/6359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/tran/6359 http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3192773 http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/IMRN/2006/96489 http://arxiv.org/abs/math.RT/0505310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-008-0547-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-008-0547-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.3476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-011-0468-y http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.3754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-012-0545-x http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11005-012-0545-x http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.4567 http://arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9612001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00222-013-0485-9 http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.5126 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02784531 http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.2457 References

A Classical Limit of Noumi's q-Integral Operator

Репозитарії

Схожі ресурси