Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras

Recently Cherednik and Feigin [arXiv:1209.1978] obtained several Rogers-Ramanujan type identities via the nilpotent double affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA). These identities further led to a series of dilogarithm identities, some of which are known, while some are left conjectural. We confirm and ex...

Повний опис

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2012
Автор: Nakanishi, T.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут математики НАН України 2012
Назва видання:Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/149184
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras / T. Nakanishi // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2012. — Т. 8. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-149184
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1491842019-02-20T01:23:31Z Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras Nakanishi, T. Recently Cherednik and Feigin [arXiv:1209.1978] obtained several Rogers-Ramanujan type identities via the nilpotent double affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA). These identities further led to a series of dilogarithm identities, some of which are known, while some are left conjectural. We confirm and explain all of them by showing the connection with Y-systems associated with (untwisted and twisted) quantum affine Kac-Moody algebras. 2012 Article Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras / T. Nakanishi // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2012. — Т. 8. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ. 1815-0659 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 17B37; 13F60 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2012.104 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/149184 en Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications Інститут математики НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description Recently Cherednik and Feigin [arXiv:1209.1978] obtained several Rogers-Ramanujan type identities via the nilpotent double affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA). These identities further led to a series of dilogarithm identities, some of which are known, while some are left conjectural. We confirm and explain all of them by showing the connection with Y-systems associated with (untwisted and twisted) quantum affine Kac-Moody algebras.
format Article
author Nakanishi, T.
spellingShingle Nakanishi, T.
Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
author_facet Nakanishi, T.
author_sort Nakanishi, T.
title Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_short Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_full Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_fullStr Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_full_unstemmed Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras
title_sort note on dilogarithm identities from nilpotent double affine hecke algebras
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
publishDate 2012
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/149184
citation_txt Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras / T. Nakanishi // Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications. — 2012. — Т. 8. — Бібліогр.: 9 назв. — англ.
series Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications
work_keys_str_mv AT nakanishit noteondilogarithmidentitiesfromnilpotentdoubleaffineheckealgebras
first_indexed 2025-07-12T21:02:32Z
last_indexed 2025-07-12T21:02:32Z
_version_ 1837476517024628736
fulltext Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 8 (2012), 104, 5 pages Note on Dilogarithm Identities from Nilpotent Double Affine Hecke Algebras Tomoki NAKANISHI Graduate School of Mathematics, Nagoya University, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 464-8604, Japan E-mail: nakanisi@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp Received November 15, 2012, in final form December 22, 2012; Published online December 25, 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2012.104 Abstract. Recently Cherednik and Feigin [arXiv:1209.1978] obtained several Rogers–Ra- manujan type identities via the nilpotent double affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA). These identities further led to a series of dilogarithm identities, some of which are known, while some are left conjectural. We confirm and explain all of them by showing the connection with Y -systems associated with (untwisted and twisted) quantum affine Kac–Moody algebras. Key words: double affine Hecke algebra; dilogarithm; Y -system 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 17B37; 13F60 1 Dilogarithm identities from Nil-DAHA Let Rn be a root system of finite type and of rank n with non-degenerate bilinear form ( , ), and let αi and ωi be the simple roots and the fundamental weights of Rn. The Cartan matrix C = (cij) n i,j=1 is given by cij = 2(αi, αj)/(αi, αi). Following [3], let A = (aij) and A[ = (a[ij) be the matrices with aij = 2(ωi, ωj) and a [ ij = (ωi, ωj), respectively. Set νi = (αi, αi)/2. Then, ν−1i (αi, ωj) = δij , and we have( A[ )−1 = ( cijν −1 j )n i,j=1 . (1) Below we normalize the bilinear form as (αshort, αshort) = 2 so that νi ∈ {1, 2, 3}. Let L(x) be the Rogers dilogarithm function L(x) = −1 2 ∫ x 0 { log(1− y) y + log y 1− y } dy. In [3, equation (3.34)] Cherednik and Feigin presented two (partially conjectural) series of di- logarithm identities. Let A′ = (a′ij) n i,j=1 be either A or A[ as above. Let Qi (i = 1, . . . , n) be the unique solution of the system of equations (1−Qi)νi = n∏ j=1 Q a′ij j (2) in the range 0 < Qi < 1. Then, the following identity was proposed 6 π2 n∑ i=1 νiL(Qi) = LA′ , (3) where the value LA′ is the rational number given in Table 1. In addition, there are identities for ‘type Tn’ (tadpole type). We define the ‘Cartan mat- rix’ C as almost the same as type An except that the last diagonal entry is 1, not 2. Also the mailto:nakanisi@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2012.104 2 T. Nakanishi Table 1. The value LA′ . Rn An Bn Cn Dn E6 E7 E8 F4 G2 Tn LA n(n+1) n+3 n(2n−1) n+1 n n− 1 36 7 63 10 15 2 36 7 3 n(2n+1) 2n+3 LA[ n(n+1) n+4 2n(2n−1) 2n+3 2n(n+1) 2n+3 2(n−1)n 2n+1 24 5 6 80 11 24 5 8 3 n(2n+1) 2n+4 matrices A and A[ are defined by aij = 2min(i, j) and a[ij = min(i, j), respectively; the latter is the same matrix A[ for type Cn. Then, (A[)−1 = C holds. We set νi = 1. Again, (3) should hold for the value LA′ in Table 1, where Tn is formally included as a member of Rn. In [3] these identities were partially obtained and generally motivated by the Rogers–Rama- nujan type identities arising from nilpotent affine Hecke algebras (Nil-DAHA), but only some of them are identified with the known identities. The authors of [3] expected the connection between (3) and dilogarithm identities from some Y -systems (and cluster algebras behind them). In this note we answer this question affirmatively, and, in particular, we confirm all the identities in question. The note has con- siderable overlap with the paper by Lee [8], but it is written for a different purpose and in a different perspective. 2 Dilogarithm identities for Y -systems of simply laced type Let us recall the following dilogarithm identities proved by cluster algebra method [9]. For ` = 2 see also [2]. Let C be any Cartan matrix of simply laced type Rn = An, Dn, E6, E7, E8, and let ` ≥ 2 be any integer (called the level). Let Y (i) m (i = 1, . . . , n; m = 1, . . . , ` − 1) be the unique real positive solution of the system of equations ( Y (i) m )2 = n∏ j=1 ( 1 + Y (j) m )2δij−cij ( 1 + Y (i) m−1 −1 )( 1 + Y (i) m+1 −1 ) , (4) where Y (i) 0 −1 = Y (i) ` −1 = 0. Theorem 1 ([9, Corollay 1.9]). The following identity holds 6 π2 n∑ i=1 `−1∑ m=1 L ( Y (i) m 1 + Y (i) m ) = (`− 1)nh h+ ` , (5) where h is the Coxeter number of type Rn, i.e., n + 1, 2n − 2, 12, 18, 30 for An, Dn, E6, E7, E8, respectively. The system of equations (4) is called the level ` constant Y -system associated with the quantum affine Kac–Moody algebra of (untwisted) type R (1) n , which is a specialization of the cor- responding (non-constant) Y -system. It is also known as the (constant) Y -system of Rn ×A`−1. See [6] for more information. We explain below that all the identities (3) in question are the ones in (5) for ` = 2, 3, or their specializations. Note on Dilogarithm Identities 3 Table 2. The Langlands dual of affine type. R (1) n A (1) n B (1) n C (1) n D (1) n E (1) 6 E (1) 7 E (1) 8 F (1) 4 G (1) 2 S (r) m A (1) n A (2) 2n−1 D (2) n+1 D (1) n E (1) 6 E (1) 7 E (1) 8 E (2) 6 D (3) 4 3 Identification with Y -systems from quantum affine Kac–Moody algebras 3.1 The non-[ case We consider the case A′ = A. We use the change of variables Qi = Yi 1 + Yi , (6) so that the range 0 < Qi < 1 corresponds to the range 0 < Yi. Then, using (1), one can transform the equations (2) into the form n∏ j=1 ( 1 1 + Yj )cij = ( Yi 1 + Yi )2 , which is equivalent to Y 2 i = n∏ j=1 (1 + Yj) 2δij−cij . (7) For simply laced typesAn,Dn, E6, E7, E8, (7) coincides with the level 2 constant Y -system (4) of untwisted type R (1) n by identifying Yi with Y (i) 1 . Then, the right hand side of (5) with ` = 2 gives the value of LA, agreeing with Table 1. In contrast, for types Bn, Cn, F4, G2, (7) coincides with the level 2 constant Y -system of twisted type S (r) m (in the sense of [6, Remark 9.22]), where S (r) m is the Langlands dual of R (1) n . See Table 2 for the Langlands dual of affine type. Also see [6, Section 9] for the full version of Y -systems of twisted type. In this case, the direct inspection of the Cartan matrix shows that the equation (7) can be obtained from the level 2 constant Y -system of the untwisted (and simply laced) type S (1) m by folding, i.e., identifying the variables with the diagram automor- phism σ of Sm. This is possible, due to the symmetry Y (i) m ↔ Y (σ(i)) m of the Y -system (4). Furthermore, it is easy to see that νi coincides with the number of elements in the σ-orbit of i. Thus, we obtain the identity (3) for type Rn with LA(Rn) = LA(Sm). For example, for Rn = Bn, LA(Bn) = LA(A2n−1). This confirms and explains Table 1. Finally, for type Tn, (7) coincides with the level 2 constant Y -system of type A (2) 2n (in the sense of [6, Remark 9.22]). Note that A (2) 2n is self-dual under the Langlands duality. Again, this Y -system is obtained by the folding of level 2 constant Y -system of untwisted A (1) 2n . Since we set νi = 1, the multiplicities are discarded in (3). Therefore, LA(Tn) = LA(A2n)/2. Actually, this connection is known in [3] and other literature. 3.2 The [ case We consider the case A′ = A[. By the same change of variables (6), one can transform the equations (2) into the form n∏ j=1 ( 1 1 + Yj )cij = ( Yi 1 + Yi ) = ( Yi 1 + Yi )2 ( 1 + Yi −1), 4 T. Nakanishi which is equivalent to Y 2 i = n∏ j=1 (1 + Yj) 2δij−cij 1 + Yi−1 . (8) For simply laced types, An, Dn, E6, E7, E8, (8) is obtained from the level 3 constant Y - system (4) of untwisted type R (1) n by the specialization Y (i) 1 = Y (i) 2 and identifying it with Yi. This is possible, due to the symmetry Y (i) 1 ↔ Y (i) 2 of level 3 Y -system (4). (One can also view it as the folding of A2 to T1 in the second component of Rn×A2.) Since we discard the multiplicity in (3), LA[ is the half of the right hand side of (5) with ` = 3. This agrees with Table 1. Similarly, for the rest of types, (8) is obtained from the level 3 constant Y -system of type S (r) m or A (2) 2n (in the sense of [6, Remark 9.22]) by the specialization Y (i) 1 = Y (i) 2 , and the latter is further obtained from the level 3 constant Y -system of type S (1) m or A (1) 2n by the folding. Then, one can confirm Table 1. Let us summarize the result. Theorem 2. The identity (3) holds. Moreover, except for type Tn, the value LA′ in (3) has a unified expression LA′ = mh∗ h∗ + ` , where ` = 2 for A′ = A and ` = 3 for A′ = A[, and m and h∗ are the rank and Coxeter number of Sm for the Langlands dual S (r) m of R (1) n . We remark that the dilogarithm identities for untwisted and nonsimply laced types B (1) n , C (1) n , F (1) 4 , G (1) 2 are also known [4, 5]. It is natural to ask whether they will also appear from Nil-DAHA. 4 Connection to cluster algebraic method For the reader’s convenience, we include a brief explanation of the background of the dilogarithm identity (5), especially in the cluster algebraic method. See [7] and references therein for more information. (a) Y -systems and dilogarithm identities. As the name suggests, the constant Y -system (4) is the constant version of the following (non-constant) Y -system Y (i) m (u+ 1)Y (i) m (u− 1) = n∏ j=1 ( 1 + Y (j) m (u) )2δij−cij ( 1 + Y (i) m−1(u) −1 )( 1 + Y (i) m+1(u) −1 ) , (9) where the variables Y (i) m (u) now carry the spectral parameter u ∈ C. The Y -system (9) appears in the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz (TBA) analysis of the deformation of conformal field theory. A constant solution Y (i) m := Y (i) m (u) of (9), which is constant with respect to u, satisfies the constant Y -system (4), that also appears in the TBA analysis to calculate the effective central charge of conformal field theory. The Y -system (9) has the following two remarkable properties. (i) Periodicity Y (i) m (u+ 2(h+ `)) = Y (i) m (u). (10) Note on Dilogarithm Identities 5 (ii) Dilogarithm identity. For any positive real solution of (9), the following identity holds 6 π2 2(h+`)−1∑ u=0 n∑ i=1 `−1∑ m=1 L ( Y (i) m (u) 1 + Y (i) m (u) ) = 2(`− 1)nh. (11) The identity (5) is obtained by specializing the identity (11) to the (unique) positive real constant solution, and dividing the both hand sides of (5) by the period 2(h+ `). (b) Cluster algebras and dilogarithm identities. It was once formidable to prove the proper- ties (10) and (11) in full generality. However, they are now proved and rather well understood by the cluster algebraic method. In general, to any period of y-variables (coefficients) of a cluster algebra, the following dilogarithm identity is associated 6 π2 p∑ t=1 L ( ykt(t) 1 + ykt(t) ) = N−. (12) where k1, . . . , kp are the sequence of mutations for which y-variables are periodic, ykt(t) is the y-variable mutated at t, and N− is the total number of t ∈ {1, . . . , p} such that the tropical sign of ykt(t) is minus. One can apply this general result to our Y -system (9). First, the Y -system is embedded into the y-variables of a certain cluster algebra. Then, by proving the periodicity of y-variables of this cluster algebra, we obtain the periodicity (10) of the Y -system. Finally, from the general identity (12), we obtain the dilogarithm identity (11) by calculating the constant term N−. (c) Quantum cluster algebras and quantum dilogarithm identities. One can lift the result in (b) to the quantum case. Namely, any period of y-variables of a cluster algebra can be lifted to the period of quantum y-variables of the corresponding quantum cluster algebra. Then, to any such period, the quantum dilogarithm identity is associated; furthermore, taking the semiclassical limit of the quantum dilogarithm identity we recover the classical dilogarithm identity (12). We expect that the Rogers–Ramanujan type identities of [3] are also deduced from these quantum dilogarithm identities. Some result in this direction is obtained by [1]. Acknowledgements I thank Ivan Cherednik for raising this interesting question to me. References [1] Cecotti S., Neitzke A., Vafa C., R-twisting and 4d/2d correspondences, arXiv:1006.3435. [2] Chapoton F., Functional identities for the Rogers dilogarithm associated to cluster Y -systems, Bull. London Math. Soc. 37 (2005), 755–760. [3] Cherednik I., Feigin B., Rogers–Ramanujan type identities and Nil-DAHA, arXiv:1209.1978 (especially version 2). [4] Inoue R., Iyama O., Keller B., Kuniba A., Nakanishi T., Periodicities of T - and Y -systems, dilogarithm identities, and cluster algebras I: Type Br, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., to appear, arXiv:1001.1880. [5] Inoue R., Iyama O., Keller B., Kuniba A., Nakanishi T., Periodicities of T - and Y -systems, dilogarithm iden- tities, and cluster algebras II: Types Cr, F4, and G2, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci., to appear, arXiv:1001.1881. [6] Inoue R., Iyama O., Kuniba A., Nakanishi T., Suzuki J., Periodicities of T -systems and Y -systems, Nagoya Math. J. 197 (2010), 59–174, arXiv:0812.0667. [7] Kashaev R.M., Nakanishi T., Classical and quantum dilogarithm identities, SIGMA 7 (2011), 102, 29 pages, arXiv:1104.4630. [8] Lee C.H., Nahm’s conjecture and Y -system, arXiv:1109.3667. [9] Nakanishi T., Dilogarithm identities for conformal field theories and cluster algebras: simply laced case, Nagoya Math. J. 202 (2011), 23–43, arXiv:0909.5480. http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.3435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/S0024609305004510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1112/S0024609305004510 http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.1978 http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1880 http://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1881 http://arxiv.org/abs/0812.0667 http://dx.doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2011.102 http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4630 http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.3667 http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.5480 1 Dilogarithm identities from Nil-DAHA 2 Dilogarithm identities for Y-systems of simply laced type 3 Identification with Y-systems from quantum affine Kac-Moody algebras 3.1 The non- case 3.2 The case 4 Connection to cluster algebraic method References