«Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development
The preconditions for restoration and investment development of Donbass according to the international "Marshall Plan" in case of peaceful settlement of armed conflict are determined. Significant advantages of Donbass as an object of the Marshall Plan implementation are shown, in particula...
Збережено в:
Дата: | 2018 |
---|---|
Автори: | , , , |
Формат: | Стаття |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Інститут економіки промисловості НАН України
2018
|
Назва видання: | Економічний вісник Донбасу |
Теми: | |
Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/150143 |
Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Цитувати: | «Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development / A. Kolosov, K. Kolosova, O. Savchenko, S. Kucherenko // Економічний вісник Донбасу. — 2018. — № 4 (54). — С. 5-11. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraineid |
irk-123456789-150143 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
irk-123456789-1501432019-04-02T01:25:12Z «Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development Kolosov, A. Kolosova, K. Savchenko, O. Kucherenko, S. Social and economic problems of Donbas The preconditions for restoration and investment development of Donbass according to the international "Marshall Plan" in case of peaceful settlement of armed conflict are determined. Significant advantages of Donbass as an object of the Marshall Plan implementation are shown, in particular, depending on the stages of the peaceful settlement in the Donbass, as well as the directions of investment of the enterprises of the largest cities of Donbas. The proposed estimation of volumes of annual investments, receipt of additional products, possibilities of its immediate consumption is offered. Визначено передумови відновлення й інвестиційного розвитку Донбасу згідно з міжнародним «Планом Маршалла» у разі мирного врегулювання збройного конфлікту. Показано суттєві переваги Донбасу як об’єкту запровадження «плану Маршалла», зокрема, у залежності від етапів мирного врегулювання в Донбасі, а також напрямки інвестування підприємств найбільших міст Донбасу. Запропоновано укрупнену оцінку обсягів щорічних інвестицій, отримання додаткової продукції, можливості її негайного споживання. Определены предпосылки восстановления и инвестиционного развития Донбасса в соответствии с международным «Планом Маршалла» в случае мирного урегулирования вооруженного конфликта. Показаны существенные преимущества Донбасса как объекта осуществления «плана Маршалла», в частности, в зависимости от этапов мирного урегулирования в Донбассе, а также направления инвестирования предприятий крупнейших городов Донбасса. Предложена укрупненная оценка объемов ежегодных инвестиций, получения дополнительной продукции, возможности ее немедленного потребления. 2018 Article «Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development / A. Kolosov, K. Kolosova, O. Savchenko, S. Kucherenko // Економічний вісник Донбасу. — 2018. — № 4 (54). — С. 5-11. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ. 1817-3772 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/150143 330.322+338.246.8(477+477.62) en Економічний вісник Донбасу Інститут економіки промисловості НАН України |
institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
collection |
DSpace DC |
language |
English |
topic |
Social and economic problems of Donbas Social and economic problems of Donbas |
spellingShingle |
Social and economic problems of Donbas Social and economic problems of Donbas Kolosov, A. Kolosova, K. Savchenko, O. Kucherenko, S. «Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development Економічний вісник Донбасу |
description |
The preconditions for restoration and investment development of Donbass according to the international "Marshall Plan" in case of peaceful settlement of armed conflict are determined. Significant advantages of Donbass as an object of the Marshall Plan implementation are shown, in particular, depending on the stages of the peaceful settlement in the Donbass, as well as the directions of investment of the enterprises of the largest cities of Donbas. The proposed estimation of volumes of annual investments, receipt of additional products, possibilities of its immediate consumption is offered. |
format |
Article |
author |
Kolosov, A. Kolosova, K. Savchenko, O. Kucherenko, S. |
author_facet |
Kolosov, A. Kolosova, K. Savchenko, O. Kucherenko, S. |
author_sort |
Kolosov, A. |
title |
«Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development |
title_short |
«Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development |
title_full |
«Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development |
title_fullStr |
«Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development |
title_full_unstemmed |
«Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development |
title_sort |
«marshall plan» for donbass: prerequisites for investment development |
publisher |
Інститут економіки промисловості НАН України |
publishDate |
2018 |
topic_facet |
Social and economic problems of Donbas |
url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/150143 |
citation_txt |
«Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequisites for investment development / A. Kolosov, K. Kolosova, O. Savchenko, S. Kucherenko // Економічний вісник Донбасу. — 2018. — № 4 (54). — С. 5-11. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ. |
series |
Економічний вісник Донбасу |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kolosova marshallplanfordonbassprerequisitesforinvestmentdevelopment AT kolosovak marshallplanfordonbassprerequisitesforinvestmentdevelopment AT savchenkoo marshallplanfordonbassprerequisitesforinvestmentdevelopment AT kucherenkos marshallplanfordonbassprerequisitesforinvestmentdevelopment |
first_indexed |
2025-07-12T23:44:37Z |
last_indexed |
2025-07-12T23:44:37Z |
_version_ |
1837486712591220736 |
fulltext |
5
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(54), 2018
SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES
UDC 330.322+338.246.8(477+477.62)
А. Kolosov,
DrHab (Economics),
К. Kolosova,
О. Savchenko,
Lugansk National University by Taras Shevchenko, Starobilsk,
S. Kucherenko,
PhD (Economics),
Dnipro National University named after Oles Honchar
«MARSHALL PLAN» FOR DONBASS:
PREREQUISITES FOR INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT
Formulation of the problem. The overcoming of
the unsatisfactory state of the Ukrainian economy,
which is marked by the increase in gross domestic pro-
duct (GDP) in 2017 at only 2%, and the expected growth
in 2018 – at 3%, requires the attraction of significant
volumes of investments, in particular external ones.
According to the Gosstat of Ukraine, the amount of di-
rect foreign investments in the economy of Ukraine, cal-
culated as the cost of equity non-resident owners, ac-
counted for a total of 38.982 billion dollars as of July 1,
2017, while the growth for the last half-year amounted
to 1.657 billion dollars. Although this gain amounted to
4.4% of the total investment, the absolute value of the
indicator does not fully meet the needs of Ukraine [1].
The awareness of the topicality of the problem and
the inevitability of the investment path of Ukraine's de-
velopment is revealed by its foreign partners, who have
recently been involved in the elaboration of an interna-
tional investment project entitled "Marshall Plan" for
Ukraine, which provides for up to 50 billion euros of in-
vestment in Ukraine's economy over 10 years [2]. It is
obvious that the central point of this program is
Ukraine's readiness to attract these investments, which,
in its turn, depends on the fate of military conflict, and,
consequently, on the willingness to use the share of
foreign investment directly for the restoration of the
Donbas. The article is namely devoted to the discussion
of this topic.
Analysis of the latest publications on the subject
of the article. The necessity of introducing foreign in-
vestments into the Ukrainian economy is recently in-
creasingly becoming the subject of discussion by vari-
ous foreign institutions, in particular, by the European
Commission [3]. Considerable attention of specialists is
paid to the experience of successful foreign investment
in the economy of Poland, the Czech Republic and other
countries of Eastern Europe [4; 5], which can also be
achieved in Ukraine. The issues of readiness of the
Ukrainian economy to effectively perceive significant
foreign investments remain the subject of attention of
researchers for a long time, in particular, monitoring of
negative factors of investment in Ukraine, according to
the estimation of the The Bleyzer Foundation [6]. It is
because of the low state of readiness of Ukraine for the
effective use of foreign investments, according to the
world rating «Doing Business», it is only in the 8th of
the 10 countries that can claim foreign investment. One
indicates that very slow inflow of foreign investment is
influenced by excessive regulation of business in
Ukraine [7].
The issue of foreign investment in the Ukrainian
economy has been increasingly connected with the pro-
cesses of the anticipated cessation of military conflict in
the Donbas and its reintegration into a single economic
complex of Ukraine. Thus, even in the recently adopted
Coalition Treaty of the Christian Democratic and Chris-
tian-Social Unions on the Social Democratic Party in
Germany stressed the participation in the financial pool
of an investment program for Ukraine, which "concerns
the full restoration of its territorial integrity, strengthen-
ing of stability and social development .... readiness to
participate hugely in the reconstruction of the Donbas"
[8]. The productivity of such investment path in the pro-
cess of restoration of Donbass was almost for first time
expressed in the fall of 2014 [9]. The urgent need for the
Donbas economy in foreign investment has recently re-
ceived some form of substantiation. Thus, according to
the "Draft Regional Target Program for Promotion of
Foreign Investments, Development of International Co-
operation and the Formation of a Positive Image of
Luhansk Oblast", it has been noted that on the territory
controlled by the Ukrainian authorities, the industrial
complex actually lost about 70% of its potential. Over
the past 5 years, the volume of external region's trade
Social and economic problems of Donbas
А. Kolosov, К. Kolosova, О. Savchenko, S. Kucherenko
6
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(54), 2018
has decreased from $ 6847.8 million in 2013 to $ 507.0
million in 2017, while foreign direct investment de-
clined from $ 826.4 million (as of 01.01.2013) to $ 441.5
million (as of 01.01.2018) [10]. At the same time, the
required amount of attraction of foreign direct invest-
ment in the region is estimated at 540.0 million dollars.
So, the questions about the preconditions in the Don-
bass, which might become a real object of foreign in-
vestment under the so-called "Marshall Plan", is the
main point of discussion in the article.
Thus, the aim of the article is to analyze the pre-
conditions for the investment development of the Don-
bas on the international "Marshall Plan".
Presentation of the main material of the article.
The issue of attraction of significant foreign investments
to Ukraine, in particular, on the restoration and develop-
ment of the Donbas economy, needs to be analyzed in
the following two aspects:
1) the readiness of Ukraine to effectively perceive
significant foreign investments, the degree of approxi-
mation of Ukraine's economy, its banking, tax, judicial
system for the civilized solution of ordinary issues that
arise in business activities;
2) the role of Donbass in the economy of the coun-
try and its importance as the object of the most profita-
ble investment in order to obtain an effect beneficial for
Ukraine as a whole.
In the aspect of increased readiness of Ukraine as a
whole, the effective use of investment funds should be
eliminated or significantly weaken the impact of the
most acute factors that foreign investors have had in re-
cent years (see Table 1 [11]).
Considering the factors listed in Table.1 one might
say that they indicate obvious signs of improving the
status of many of them during 2017-18 years. So, with
regard to the factors of sphere A, we observe the stabi-
lization of the hryvnia exchange rate (factor 2), reduc-
tion of price inflation (factor 6), some macroeconomic
stabilization (factor 7), simplification of customs proce-
dures (factor 8). At the same time, excessively high in-
terest rates on lending, general difficulties in obtaining
loans (factors 1 and 3), lack of substantial amount of free
capital (factor 9) only emphasize that Ukraine's invest-
ment development is really possible, primarily due to
foreign investment.
Table 1
List of the most acute negative factors of foreign investment implementation in Ukraine
Sphere of
manifestation
Negative factors of foreign investment in Ukraine
А. General eco-
nomic status and
management sys-
tem
economy
1. Excessively high interest rates on loans
2. Inflated devaluation of the hryvnia exchange rate
3. Difficulties in obtaining long-term loans
4. Low level of protection of intellectual and physical property rights
6. Significant price inflation in the domestic market
7. Insufficient macroeconomic stability
8. Complicated customs procedures with high costs
9. Lack of capital market for issuance of securities
B. Legislation and
practice of doing
business
10. The burdensome system of tax collection
11. Absence of real guarantees of protection of shareholders from raiding and illicit partnership
12. Excessive inspections of state authorities for control purposes
13. Unfair competition by monopolists
14. Excessive taxation of business and wages
15. Excessive business regulation
16. Complex bankruptcy and liquidation procedures of enterprises
C. Judiciary 17. Disadvantages of judicial field, which make it an obstacle for doing business
18. The level of independence of judges is too low
19. Ineffective enforcement of judgments, their injustice, bias and selectivity
D. The level of
general corruption
20. Administrative corruption at the level of government officials
21. Corruption in the field of public procurement
22. Corruption in private business, distribution of raider attacks on enterprises
23. Corruption at the level of local self-government bodies
E. Foreign and do-
mestic policy
24. Delaying the peaceful settlement of military conflict
25. The presence of signs of growth of the negative image of the country
26. Lack of stability and transparency of government policy
27. Insufficient transparency of public disclosure
28. Concern over possible social unrest, in particular, related to the upcoming presidential and
Verkhovna Rada elections
А. Kolosov, К. Kolosova, О. Savchenko, S. Kucherenko
7
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(54), 2018
There has been some positive progress in business
law and practice (field B), especially in terms of simpli-
fying tax administration, reducing business regulation
and systematic inspection, as well as reducing wages
and salaries by introducing a reduced social tax rate
(ECU) to 22%. The imperfection of the judicial system
(sphere C) is partially overcome or remains the focus of
state attention in the process of judicial reform in
Ukraine. Obviously, the main obstacle to the inflow of
foreign investment remains the presence of high general
corruption in Ukraine (sphere D), not counting on the
launch of a whole series of new anti-corruption institu-
tions. Yet, hopes for improvements in this area are be-
coming more realistic, in particular, due to the active in-
terest of the international community and European in-
stitutions that provide financial assistance to Ukraine,
opening up the path to accession to NATO and the EU,
depending on the degree Overcoming Corruption in
Ukraine.
Unfortunately, without positive dynamics, there
are negative factors that shape the image of Ukraine in
its foreign and domestic policy (sphere D). It is precisely
the absence of distinct Ukrainian policy on the peaceful
settlement of military conflict (factor 24) that entails
other negative factors forming the negative image of
Ukraine (factors 25 and 26). The negative impact is the
lack of clear policy of unconditional adherence to the
principles of democracy and the rule of law in the pro-
cess of the presidential and parliamentary elections ex-
pected in 2019 (factors 27 and 28).
To determine the possible role of Donbas in the
process of obtaining and mastering the investment pro-
gram under the "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine, it should
be borne in mind that holistic diversified Donbass com-
plex before the beginning of the conflict played a lead-
ing role in the Ukrainian economy. With only 8.8% of
the territory and about 16% of Ukraine's population, it
produced 25.0% of industrial and 8.0% of agricultural
production in the country [12]. The development of a
significant part of the funds under the "Marshall Plan"
in the Donbass has certain advantages, which are given
in Table 2.
Table 2
Major Benefits of Donbass for Marshall Plan Implementation *
Sphere of
manifestation benefits
Benefits of Donbass against the background of general indicators for Ukraine
1. Demography and the
state of labor for invest-
ment
1. Availability of free labor resources as a result of the termination of enterprises in the
Donbas
2. High level of qualification of available labor resources for restoration of suspended
and construction of new enterprises
3. High concentration of urban and rural population, which simplifies the distribution of
new products for consumption, namely:
- the average population density in the Donbass is 121 persons / km2 against 73 persons
/ km2 in Ukraine;
- the share of Donbass population in Ukraine is about 15%, and the share of cities – 19%
(89 out of 460) with the share of the Donbas area – 8.8%
2. Transport infrastruc-
ture
1. Presence of traditional logistics of supply of raw materials, semi-finished products
and products within the single industrial complex of Donbass, which was developed and
improved by dozens of years
2. The maximum density of railways, the length of which is 13% of the Ukrainian Rail-
way Enterprise common network? Donetsk railway performed 47% of loading and 36%
of unloading works with a positive balance in favor of other regions of the country
3. The presence of a developed network of highways, efficient use which only needs to
be restored and repaired
4. The presence of a powerful seaport in Mariupol
3. Power supply The presence of the most powerful TES, in particular Vuglegirskaya (3.6 million kW),
Starobeshivska (about 2 million kW), Lugansk and Kurakhovskaya (1.5 million kW).
For comparison, the power of the hydropower cascade on the Dnipro River totals
2.5 million kW
4. Synergy effect The possibility of multiplier effect from investments in the restoration of enterprises that
launch whole chains in neighbor industries (coal – coke production – metallurgical
production – freight transport, etc.)
5. Consumption market Extremely low security of the population by high-tech household goods, information
technology, new types of communication, which promotes investment in their produc-
tion for domestic consumption
6. Purchasing power of
consumers
The purchasing power of the region has a resource to increase in case of significant in-
vestment in its economy, which will be promoted by the course of the country's leader-
ship to increase the minimum and average wages, pension benefits
* The table is compiled by the authors on the basis of statistical data.
А. Kolosov, К. Kolosova, О. Savchenko, S. Kucherenko
8
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(54), 2018
Given the lack of yet fully predictable progress in
the peaceful settlement of the conflict in the Donbas, the
process of deploying the "Marshall Plan" is still to be
considered as varied in the spirit of its reflection in
Table 3.
Table 3
Implementation of the Marshall Plan International Project for Ukraine
depending on the stages of the peaceful settlement in Donbass
Possible sequence of stages
peaceful settlement of military conflict
Possible implementation steps of international investment
process for "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine
1. Preserving the current state of military con-
flict
1. Restoration of the damaged production base of critical produc-
tion in the controlled part of Donbass.
2. Improvement of the state of energy and transport infrastructure
in the controlled part of Donbass
3. Creation of the necessary new chains of energy and transport
infrastructure in the northern part of the Luhansk region, cut off
from the common industrial complex of Donbass and Ukraine
2. Establishment of international mediation in
the zone of military conflict
Launching the restoration of production, energy and transport in-
frastructure on the territory controlled by Ukrainian government
3. Initiation of the definition of the modalities
of the political settlement of the conflict situa-
tion and the restoration of economic coopera-
tion
Implementation of the design and preparatory stages of
investing in the creation of new modern productions under the gen-
eral "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine
4. Beginning of the processes of the political
settlement of the conflict and reintegration of
Donbas
Creating new production facilities with elaboration of new prod-
ucts under the "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine
5. Beginning of functioning of separate dis-
tricts of Donetsk and Luhansk regions within
the united political and economic space of
Ukraine
Implementation of the "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine in full for the
intended period of investment
In addition to the general socio-economic factors,
the possibility of urgent investment under the "Marshall
Plan" in Donbass is a complete picture of the specific
directions of investment in a large number of enter-
prises. Those, that are most important for cities and
which have been monitored throughout the period of
their functioning in the conditions of division of a pre-
viously unified economic complex of Donbass.
Table 4 shows a fragment of the actual directions
of investment in the enterprises of the largest cities of
Donbass only in the part of Donbas, which is currently
controlled by Ukraine.
As yet, we are not talking about a specific eco-
nomic justification for the effectiveness of the expected
investments, we will carry out an enlarged assessment
of its possible results.
1. The volume of investments in the reconstruction
of Donbas can be quite significant, only on the "Mar-
shall Plan": $ 50 billion / 10 years = $ 5 billion a year.
According to the "European Commission's plan" it is
considered possible to attract up to 10 dollars of state
guarantees for 1 dollar, therefore, it is possible to expect
from 5 to 10 billion dollars annually, which is quite real,
since on average Ukraine as a whole receives about
3 billion dollars of investments even without powerful
international initiatives.
2. It can be expected that the introduction of invest-
ments in the Donbas economy will not be traditional for
the western regions of Ukraine, when they invest in the
creation of virtually new enterprises for the production
of consumer goods (division 2). Considering the readi-
ness of the existing industrial enterprises of Donbas,
whose level of loading does not exceed one third, to im-
mediately introduce investments in increasing produc-
tion volumes, it can be assumed that the structure of in-
vestments can be 80-70% by 20-30%, according to the
ratio of divisions 1 (production of means of production)
and 2 (production of consumption).
3. The effectiveness of investments is largely de-
pendent on the rate of consumption of newly created ad-
ditional products. Obviously, an increase in industrial
production will only partially cover the loss of industrial
potential as a result of the economic blockade of Don-
bas, which occurred in 2017, and will immediately enter
the national industrial turnover, including the increase
of Ukrainian exports.
4. With regard to new products in the form of con-
sumer goods, it is possible to assess the prospects of its
domestic consumption in the region, which would be-
come a fuse for accelerating inflationary processes.
Even with the annual investment of 2-3 billion dollars in
the production of goods with a return on capital of at
least 10%, we have an increase in consumption of US
$ 200-300 million a year, with a third of US $ 70-
100 million in wage growth. Thus, on average, the in-
habitant of the whole Donbas (6 million people) is: $ 70-
100 million dollars / 6 million people = $ 12-16 dollars
of additional annual consumption, which is not in doubt.
А. Kolosov, К. Kolosova, О. Savchenko, S. Kucherenko
9
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(54), 2018
Table 4
Actual directions of investment in the enterprises of the largest cities of Donbass (fragment)
City,
(population, thousand people),
major industries
Definition of problems Investment direction
Donetsk region
Mariupol (500), ferrous metal-
lurgy, machine building, seaport
The terrible environmental situation
due to the emission of harmful sub-
stances into the air
Investing in environmental equipment
The acute need to restore the full-
fledged work of PJSC "Azovmash"
Orders investment
Kramatorsk (160), Slavyansk
(116), Druzhkivka (60), machine
building
Low workload of enterprises Orders investment
Kostantynivka (80), ferrous and
nonferrous metallurgy
Decline in production Investing in the revival of enterprises
Pokrovsk (60), Dobropillya (30),
coal industry
Limited production capacity of
mines
Investing in the development of coal
production
Avdiyivka (35), coke industry Location of the infrastructure close
to the front
Investing in the development of the in-
dustrial infrastructure of the coke plant
Luhansk region
Severodonetsk (108), chemical
industry
Low loading of PrJSC «Azot» Investing in increasing production
Lisichansk (102), oil refining,
machine building, glass produc-
tion, coal industry
Decline in production Investing in refurbishment of refineries,
machinery, glass production
Limited production capacity of
mines
Investing in the development of coal
production
Rubizhne (60), chemical and
pharmaceutical industry
Reduced production volumes Investing in the production of dyes,
drugs and other
chemical and pharmaceutical products
for export
Popasna (21), railroad, machine
building
Low production use Orders investment
Kreminna (20), local industry The termination of the work of in-
dustrial enterprises
Investing in the restoration of industrial
enterprises
Svatovo (18), agricultural pro-
cessing
Insufficient raw material base Investing in entrepreneurship in agricul-
ture
Schastia (12), thermal power
plant (TES)
Low TES load, separation from the
Unified Energy System of Ukraine
Investing in material supplies, joining
TES to the Unified Energy System of
Ukraine
Conclusions and suggestions. As defined in the
article, the factors behind the implementation of the in-
ternational "Marshall Plan" for Ukraine provide the ba-
sis for further discussion of the status, content, objects,
terms, amount of investment and economic feasibility of
the proposed project for Donbas. The results of the con-
sideration of the problem can focus on the leadership of
Ukraine on the implementation of measures to eliminate
the factors of negative impact on the investment attrac-
tiveness of the country as the object of investment. At
the same time, explaining the role of existing positive
conditions for large-scale investment project taking
place at present on the territory of Donbas controlled by
Ukrainian government, and taking into account the new
opportunities opened up as the process of peace settle-
ment in Donbas is progressing and joining it to a com-
mon economic complex of Ukraine.
Literature
1. Держстат підрахував обсяг іноземних інвести-
цій в економіку України / УНІАН // Фінанси. 2017. 29
серп. URL: https://economics.unian.ua/finance/ 2105459-
derjstat-pidrahuvav-obsyag-inozemnih-investitsiy-v-eko
nomiku-ukrajini.html. 2. Литовський «план Мар-
шалла» для України: 50 мільярдів євро інвестицій за 10
років / УНІАН // Євробізнес. 2017. 14 верес. URL :
https://www.unian.ua/ eurobusiness/ 2133 644-litovskiy-
plan-marshalla-dlya-ukrajini-50-milyardi v-evro-investit
siy-za-10-rokiv.html. 3. Українсько-литовський проект
«плану Маршалла» для України представили в євро-
пейських інститутах, його досліджуватиме Європей-
ська комісія / iPress.ua. 25.08.2017. URL :
http://ipress.ua/news/u_yes _prezen tuvaly_proekt_planu
_marshalla_dlya_ukrainy_223360.html. 4. Оренштейн
М. Польша: от трагедии к триумфу / Foreign Affairs ;
пер. с англ. 2014. № 1. Январь/февраль. URL :
А. Kolosov, К. Kolosova, О. Savchenko, S. Kucherenko
10
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(54), 2018
http://www.lesovod.org.ua/ sites/ default/files/images/a3-
image002.jpg. 5. Данилишин Б. Чехія відкриває Укра-
їні двері до Європи // ГЛАВКОМ. 20.10.2013. URL :
http://glavcom.ua/articles/ 14761.html. 6. Сегура Джу-
лія. Інвестиційний клімат в Україні – 2016. Яким його
бачить американський інвестор? / The Bleyzer Founda-
tion // Рublikations. 2016. URL : authors/segura.html. 7.
Ляшенко В.І., Толмачова Г.Ф. Оцінка процесів дере-
гуляції підприємницької діяльності в Україні. Економі-
чний вісник Донбасу. 2018. № 1 (51). С. 23-30. 8. Німе-
цька коаліція у своєму договорі згадала про Донбас /
Главком. 07.02.2018. URL : https://glavcom.ua/news/ni
mecka-koaliciya-u-svojemu-dogovori-zgadala-pro-don
bas--471992.html. 9. Кодецкий В., Штепа Ю. «План
Маршалла» для Донбасса. ZN,UA. 2014. 19 сент. URL :
https://zn.ua/economics_ of_regions/plan-marshalla-dlya -
donbassa-_.html?page=2&items=25. 10. Проект Регіо-
нальної цільової програми сприяння залученню інозе-
мних інвестицій, розвитку міжнародного співробітни-
цтва та формування позитивного іміджу Луганської
області / Луганська обласна державна адміністрація.
Обласна військово-цивільна адміністрація. 2018. URL:
http://loga.gov.ua/ oda/press/news/dep_ved/proekt_ regio
nalnoyi_cilovoyi_programi_spriyannya_zaluchennyu_ ino
zemnih. 11. Кучеренко С. К. Типологія умов інвесту-
вання в Україні. Вісник Дніпропетровського універси-
тету. Серія «Економіка. 2016, № 10/1, т. 24. Вип.10
(2). С.121-129. 12. Відродження Донбасу: оцінка соці-
ально-економічних втрат і пріоритетні напрями держа-
вної політики / Національна академія наук України.
Київ, 2015.
References
1. Derzhstat pidrakhuvav obsiah inozemnykh
investytsii v ekonomiku Ukrainy [State Statistics has esti-
mated the amount of foreign investment in the economy of
Ukraine]. (2017). UNIAN. Finances. www.unian.ua.
Retrieved from https://economics.unian.ua/finance/ 2105
459-derjstat-pidrahuvav-obsyag-inozemnih-investitsiy-v-
ekonomiku-ukrajini.html [in Ukrainian].
2. Lytovskyi «plan Marshalla» dlia Ukrainy: 50
miliardiv yevro investytsii za 10 rokiv [Lithuanian Mar-
shall Plan for Ukraine: 50 billion euros of investment over
10 years]. (2017). UNIAN. Eurobusiness. www.unian.ua.
Retrieved from https://www.unian.ua/ eurobusiness/2133
644-litovskiy-plan-marshalla-dlya-ukrajini-50-milyardiv-
evro-investitsiy-za-10-rokiv. html [in Ukrainian].
3. Ukrainsko-lytovskyi proekt «planu Marshalla» dlia
Ukrainy predstavyly v yevropeiskykh instytutakh, yoho
doslidzhuvatyme Yevropeiska komisiia [Ukrainian-Lithu-
anian project "Marshall Plan" presented to Ukraine in Eu-
ropean institutes, will be examined by the European Com-
mission]. (2017). ipress.ua. Retrieved from http://ipress.
ua/ news/u_yes_prezentuvaly_proekt _planu_marshalla_
dlya_ukrainy_223360.html [in Ukrainian].
4. Orenshtein, M. (2014). Polsha: ot trahedyy k
tryumfu [Poland: from tragedy to triumph]. Foreign
Affairs. Vol. 1, January / February. www.lesovod. org.ua.
Retrieved from http://www.lesovod.org.ua/sites/ default/
files/images/a3-image002.jpg.
5. Danylyshyn, B. (2013). Chekhiia vidkryvaie
Ukraini dveri do Yevropy [The Czech Republic opens the
door for Europe to Europe]. Glavkom. glavcom.ua.
Retrieved from http://glavcom.ua/articles/14761.html [in
Ukrainian].
6. Sehura, Dzhuliia. (2016). Investytsiinyi klimat v
Ukraini – 2016. Yakym yoho bachyt amerykanskyi
investor? [The investment climate in Ukraine is 2016.
What does the American investor see?]. The Bleyzer Foun-
dation. Рublikations. Retrieved from authors/segura.html.
7. Liashenko, V.I., Tolmachova, H.F. (2018). Otsinka
protsesiv derehuliatsii pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti v
Ukraini [Assessment of Deregulation processes of entre-
preneurial activity in Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk
Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbas, № 1 (51),
рр. 23-30 [in Ukrainian].
8. Nimetska koalitsiia u svoiemu dohovori zghadala
pro Donbas [The German coalition in its agreement men-
tioned the Donbass]. (2018). Glavkom. glavcom.ua.
Retrieved from https://glavcom.ua/news/ nimecka-
koaliciya-u-svojemu-dogovori-zgadala-pro-donbas--4719
92.html [in Ukrainian].
9. Kodetskyi V., Shtepa Yu. (2014). «Plan
Marshalla» dlia Donbassa [Marshall Plan for the Don-
bass]. ZN,UA. Retrieved from https://zn.ua/economics_
of_regions/plan-marshalla-dlya-donbassa-_.html?page=2
& items=25 [in Russian].
10. Proekt Rehionalnoi tsilovoi prohramy spryiannia
zaluchenniu inozemnykh investytsii, rozvytku mizhna-
rodnoho spivrobitnytstva ta formuvannia pozytyvnoho
imidzhu Luhanskoi oblasti [Draft Regional Target Pro-
gram for Promotion of Foreign Investments, Development
of International Cooperation and the Formation of a Posi-
tive Image of the Lugansk Region]. (2018). Lugansk
Regional State Administration. Regional military-civilian
administration. loga.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://loga.
gov.ua/oda/press/news/dep_ved/proekt_regionalnoyi_cilo
voyi_programi_spriyannya_zaluchennyu_inozemnih [in
Ukrainian].
7. Liashenko, V.I., Tolmachova, H.F. (2018). Otsinka
protsesiv derehuliatsii pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti v
Ukraini [Assessment of Deregulation processes of entre-
preneurial activity in Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk
Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbas, № 1 (51), 23-
30 [in Ukrainian].
8. Nimetska koalitsiia u svoiemu dohovori zghadala
pro Donbas [The German coalition in its agreement men-
tioned the Donbass]. (2018). Glavkom. glavcom.ua.
Retrieved from https://glavcom.ua/news/nimecka-ko
aliciya-u-svojemu-dogovori-zgadala-pro-donbas--471992.
html [in Ukrainian].
9. Kodetskyi V., Shtepa Yu. (2014). «Plan Mar-
shalla» dlia Donbassa [Marshall Plan for the Donbass].
ZN,UA. Retrieved from https://zn.ua/economics_ of_
regions/plan-marshalla-dlya-donbassa-_.html?page=2&
ite ms=25 [in Russian].
10. Proekt Rehionalnoi tsilovoi prohramy spryiannia
zaluchenniu inozemnykh investytsii, rozvytku mizhna-
rodnoho spivrobitnytstva ta formuvannia pozytyvnoho
А. Kolosov, К. Kolosova, О. Savchenko, S. Kucherenko
11
Економічний вісник Донбасу № 4(54), 2018
imidzhu Luhanskoi oblasti [Draft Regional Target Pro-
gram for Promotion of Foreign Investments, Development
of International Cooperation and the Formation of a Posi-
tive Image of the Lugansk Region]. (2018). Lugansk
Regional State Administration. Regional military-civilian
administration. loga.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://loga.
gov.ua/oda/press/news/dep_ved/proekt_regionalnoyi_cilo
voyi_programi_ spriyan nya_zaluchennyu_inozemnih [in
Ukrainian].
11. Kucherenko S. K. (2016). Typolohiia umov
investuvannia v Ukraini [Typology of investment condi
tions in Ukraine]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovskoho universytetu.
Seriia «Ekonomika» – Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk
University. Series "Economics», 10/1, vol. 24, Iss.10 (2),
рр. 121-129 [in Ukrainian].
12. Vidrodzhennia Donbasu: otsinka sotsialno-
ekonomichnykh vtrat i priorytetni napriamy derzhavnoi
polityky [Revival of the Donbas: assessment of socio-
economic losses and priority directions of state policy].
(2015). Natsionalna akademiia nauk Ukrainy – National
Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Колосов А. М., Колосова К. А., Савченко
О. С., Кучеренко С. К. «План Маршалла» для Дон-
басу: передумови інвестиційного розвитку
Визначено передумови відновлення й інвестицій-
ного розвитку Донбасу згідно з міжнародним «Планом
Маршалла» у разі мирного врегулювання збройного
конфлікту. Показано суттєві переваги Донбасу як
об’єкту запровадження «плану Маршалла», зокрема, у
залежності від етапів мирного врегулювання в Дон-
басі, а також напрямки інвестування підприємств най-
більших міст Донбасу. Запропоновано укрупнену
оцінку обсягів щорічних інвестицій, отримання додат-
кової продукції, можливості її негайного споживання.
Ключові слова: «план Маршалла», міжнародні ін-
вестиції, Україна, інвестиційні переваги, економічне
відродження Донбасу.
Колосов А. Н., Колосова Е. А., Савченко
А. С., Кучеренко С. К. «План Маршалла» для Дон-
басса: предпосылки инвестиционного развития
Определены предпосылки восстановления и ин-
вестиционного развития Донбасса в соответствии с
международным «Планом Маршалла» в случае мир-
ного урегулирования вооруженного конфликта. Пока-
заны существенные преимущества Донбасса как объ-
екта осуществления «плана Маршалла», в частности, в
зависимости от этапов мирного урегулирования в Дон-
бассе, а также направления инвестирования предприя-
тий крупнейших городов Донбасса. Предложена
укрупненная оценка объемов ежегодных инвестиций,
получения дополнительной продукции, возможности
ее немедленного потребления.
Ключевые слова: «план Маршалла», международ-
ные инвестиции, Украина, инвестиционные преиму-
щества, экономическое возрождение Донбасса.
Kolosov A., Kolosova K., Savchenko O., Ku-
cherenko S. «Marshall Plan» for Donbass: prerequi-
sites for investment development
The preconditions for restoration and investment de-
velopment of Donbass according to the international "Mar-
shall Plan" in case of peaceful settlement of armed conflict
are determined. Significant advantages of Donbass as an
object of the Marshall Plan implementation are shown, in
particular, depending on the stages of the peaceful settle-
ment in the Donbass, as well as the directions of investment
of the enterprises of the largest cities of Donbas. The pro-
posed estimation of volumes of annual investments, receipt
of additional products, possibilities of its immediate con-
sumption is offered.
Keywords: "Marshall Plan", international investment,
Ukraine, investment advantages, economic revival of Don-
bas.
Received by the editors: 23.11.2018
and final form 14.12.2018
|