Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees

The paper concerns the Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of level homogeneous rooted trees. We recall and summarize the results obtained by L.Kaluzhnin on the structure of Sylow p-subgroups of isometry groups of ultrametric Cantor p-spaces in terms of automorphism groups of rooted trees. Mos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2015
Hauptverfasser: Bier, A., Sushchansky, V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України 2015
Schriftenreihe:Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
Online Zugang:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/152783
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees / A. Bier, V. Sushchansky // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2015. — Vol. 19, № 1. — С. 19-38. — Бібліогр.: 22 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-152783
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1527832019-06-13T01:25:07Z Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees Bier, A. Sushchansky, V. The paper concerns the Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of level homogeneous rooted trees. We recall and summarize the results obtained by L.Kaluzhnin on the structure of Sylow p-subgroups of isometry groups of ultrametric Cantor p-spaces in terms of automorphism groups of rooted trees. Most of the paper should be viewed as a systematic topical survey, however we include some new ideas in last sections. 2015 Article Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees / A. Bier, V. Sushchansky // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2015. — Vol. 19, № 1. — С. 19-38. — Бібліогр.: 22 назв. — англ. 1726-3255 2010 MSC:20B27, 20E08, 20B22, 20B35, 20F65, 20B07. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/152783 en Algebra and Discrete Mathematics Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description The paper concerns the Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of level homogeneous rooted trees. We recall and summarize the results obtained by L.Kaluzhnin on the structure of Sylow p-subgroups of isometry groups of ultrametric Cantor p-spaces in terms of automorphism groups of rooted trees. Most of the paper should be viewed as a systematic topical survey, however we include some new ideas in last sections.
format Article
author Bier, A.
Sushchansky, V.
spellingShingle Bier, A.
Sushchansky, V.
Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees
Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
author_facet Bier, A.
Sushchansky, V.
author_sort Bier, A.
title Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees
title_short Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees
title_full Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees
title_fullStr Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees
title_full_unstemmed Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees
title_sort kaluzhnin's representations of sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees
publisher Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
publishDate 2015
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/152783
citation_txt Kaluzhnin's representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees / A. Bier, V. Sushchansky // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2015. — Vol. 19, № 1. — С. 19-38. — Бібліогр.: 22 назв. — англ.
series Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
work_keys_str_mv AT biera kaluzhninsrepresentationsofsylowpsubgroupsofautomorphismgroupsofpadicrootedtrees
AT sushchanskyv kaluzhninsrepresentationsofsylowpsubgroupsofautomorphismgroupsofpadicrootedtrees
first_indexed 2025-07-14T04:16:43Z
last_indexed 2025-07-14T04:16:43Z
_version_ 1837594422968057856
fulltext Algebra and Discrete Mathematics RESEARCH ARTICLE Volume 19 (2015). Number 1, pp. 19–38 © Journal “Algebra and Discrete Mathematics” Kaluzhnin’s representations of Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of p-adic rooted trees Agnieszka Bier and Vitaliy Sushchansky Abstract. The paper concerns the Sylow p-subgroups of automorphism groups of level homogeneous rooted trees. We recall and summarize the results obtained by L. Kaluzhnin on the structure of Sylow p-subgroups of isometry groups of ultrametric Cantor p-spaces in terms of automorphism groups of rooted trees. Most of the paper should be viewed as a systematic topical survey, however we include some new ideas in last sections. 1. Introduction The Sylow p-subgroup P∞ of the automorphism group of a p-adic rooted tree is one of the most popular examples of pro-p groups.This is due to the universality of P∞ in the classes of all countable residually-p groups and profinite groups of countable weight. The group has natural characterizations in topological terms (as the group of isometries of Cantor metric space), geometrical terms (as a group of automorphisms of a rooted tree) and algebraic terms (as an infinitely iterated wreath product of cyclic groups of order p). It may be also defined as the limit of the inverse spectrum of Sylow p-subgroups in symmetric groups of orders p, p2, p2,..., etc. If p = 2 the group P∞ coincides with the whole automorphism group of the binary tree. 2010 MSC: 20B27, 20E08, 20B22, 20B35, 20F65, 20B07. Key words and phrases: Sylow p-subgroups of wreath products of groups, homogeneous rooted trees, automorphisms of trees. 20 Kaluzhnin’s representations It is worth mentioning that all known examples of residually finite groups of Burnside type may be embedded in the Sylow p-subgroup P∞ of the automorphism group of a p-adic rooted tree, and most of them were obtained just as subgroups of P∞. Therefore P∞ remains an interesting object of investigations and important for the overall theory. The group P∞ has been introduced almost 70 years ago by L. Kaluzh- nin in his note [12] as a generalisation of the finite groups Pm, more precisely as an inverse limit of the system of groups Pm, m ∈ N. The note was a part of a series of papers on Sylow p-subgroups of symmet- ric groups [8–14]. In his paper [14] professor Kaluzhnin summarized his results on P∞. The main of these are: (i) characterization of P∞ as a Sylow p-subgroup of isometry group of an ultrametric Cantor p-space, metrization of P∞ and investigations of its universal properties among so called p∞-groups; (ii) introduction of the concept of parallelotopic subgroups and deter- mination of necessary and sufficient conditions for these subgroups to be normal in P∞; (iii) characterization of invariant to isometric automorphisms subgroups of P∞. The results (i)–(iii) were obtained as generalisations of the respective results in groups Pm. After Kaluzhnin’s papers the group structure of P∞ has not been much investigated. Some results concerning the au- tomorphism group of P∞ were obtained by P. Lentoudis in [20], who studied isometric automorphisms and gave their complete description. In [1] M. Abert and B. Virag discussed some probabilistic properties of groups acting on rooted trees. In [22] V. Sushchansky discussed em- beddings of residually finite p-groups into the groups of isometries of the space of p-adic integers. Some facts regarding this group follow from investigations of infinitely iterated wreath products of groups [15], branch groups [2] and some others [18,19]. In the presented paper we give a systematic overview on the results known on the structure of the group P∞ and provide a few new facts in this topic. In Section 2 we introduce the notion of a (finite) rooted p-tree and discuss the group of its automorphisms. Section 3 concerns automor- phism groups of infinite p-trees and provides a useful representation of elements of such groups. In Section 4 we discuss the standard embedding of residually finite groups as topological groups (the coset representation) into the automorphism groups of some infinite level homogeneous tree. A. Bier, V. Sushchansky 21 We also deduce and recall the universal properties of the group P∞. In Section 5 we discuss another representation of elements of P∞, proposed by L. Kaluzhnin for p-elements of automorphism groups of either finite or infinite p-adic rooted trees. Some basic results on this notation and its properties are recalled here after [13]. We note that some generalization of Kaluzhnin’s representation is proposed and investigated in [4]. Section 6 is devoted to subgroups in P∞ of a special type — the so called ideal subgroups. We recall and prove a number of observations on ideal subgroups of P∞ and use it in Sections 7 and 8 for discussion on the lower central series and isometrically characteristic subgroups of P∞. 2. Rooted p-trees of finite height and groups of their automorphisms Let T (v) denote a rooted tree, i.e. a connected graph with no cycles and a designated vertex v called the root. Every two vertices u and w of the tree are connected with a unique path. The length of this path, i.e. the number of edges in the path, is called the distance between u and w. The set of all vertices of the tree T (v) can be partitioned into subsets, called levels, with respect to the distance of the given vertex to the root v. The n-th level, denoted by Ln is defined by the distance n, and L0 = {v}. Given a vertex w ∈ Ln the number of vertices in Ln+1 which are adjacent to w is called the (branch) index of w. A rooted tree is called level-homogeneous if at every level the indices of all vertices are equal. For brevity, we will call the common index of the vertices in level Ln — the index of level Ln. It is clear that the index level of Ln is equal to |Ln|/|Ln−1|. A level homogeneous tree can be uniquely characterized (up to isomorphism) by a sequence (either finite or infinite) κ = (n1, n2, ..., ) of level indices; we denote this tree by Tκ. If there exists N , such that LN 6= ∅ and LN+k = ∅ for all k > 0, then N is called the height of the rooted tree. In this paper we are concerned with the p-trees, which are defined to be level-homogeneous rooted trees such that the indices related to every level of the tree (except the last level) are p-powers (p — a prime). Namely, given a sequence p = {pni}N i=1 of natural powers of a prime p, we define a rooted p-tree Tp(v,N) with root v as a level-homogeneous tree in which the i-th level has the index pni , 1 < i < N and the last level has index 0. One special example of a p-tree is the p-adic rooted 22 Kaluzhnin’s representations tree Tp(v,N), in which all level indices, except those in the first and the last level, are equal to p (i.e. the sequence p is constant). A bijection τ from the set of vertices of T to itself is called an auto- morphism of the tree T , if it preserves the adjacency of vertices. When discussing automorphisms of a rooted tree, one additionally requires an automorphism to preserve the root. The set of all automorphisms of the tree T with the operation of morphism composition constitutes a group, which we will denote by AutT . Let us first recall the well known result on the structure of AutTp(v,N): Proposition 2.1. Let p = {pni}N i=1 be a sequence of natural powers of prime p. Then AutTp(v,N) ∼= N ≀ i=1 Spni . In particular, for a p-adic rooted tree Tp(v,N) of height N we have AutTp(v,N) ∼= N ≀ i=1 S(i) p . The proposition shows the mutual correspondence of groups of automor- phisms of a p-adic rooted tree and certain transformation groups. This can be easily seen by studying the action of a p-adic rooted tree automorphism on the last level of the tree. Every such action is a permutation from SpN , where N is the height of the tree. In his papers [8–11,13], L. Kaluzhnin studied the Sylow p-subgroups of the symmetric group Spn . His investigations begin with the following results: Lemma 2.2. The Sylow p-subgroup Sylp(SpN ) of the symmetric group SpN is isomorphic to a N-iterated wreath power of cyclic groups Cp of degree p: Sylp(SpN ) ∼= N ≀ i=1 C(i) p . This result may be extended to the automorphism group of any rooted p-tree: Proposition 2.3. Let p = {pni}N i=1 be a sequence of natural powers of prime p. Then every Sylow p-subgroup Sylp(AutTp(v,N)) is isomorphic to the M -iterated wreath power of cyclic groups of degree p: Sylp(AutTp(v,N)) ∼= M ≀ i=1 C(i) p , where M = n1 + n2 + ...+ nN . A. Bier, V. Sushchansky 23 Proof. It is enough to see that the iterated wreath power of permutation groups is associative. Then we have: Sylp(AutTp(v,N)) ∼= N ≀ i=1 Sylp(Spni ) ∼= N ≀ i=1 ni ≀ j=1 C(j) p ∼= M ≀ i=1 C(i) p , where M stands for the sum of all ni, i = 1, ..., N . The above proposition shows in particular, that the study of Sylow p-subgroup of a rooted p-tree bears the same class of groups as Sylow p-subgroups of a p-adic rooted tree. In the following, the Sylow p-subgroup of AutTp(v, n) will be denoted by Pn. 3. Automorphism groups of infinite p-trees So far we have discussed only finite trees, i.e. trees with finitely many vertices. An infinite tree is said to be locally finite, if the branch index of every vertex in that tree is finite. As particular examples of locally finite trees one may consider the (infinite) rooted p-tree Tp(v) and an (infinite) p-adic rooted tree Tp(v). These are trees with infinitely many levels (hence no leaves) and infinitely many infinite paths starting at root (rays). The uncountably infinite set ∂Tp(v) of all rays is called the boundary of the tree. In the set ∂Tp(v) we introduce a metric ∆ in the following way. For two rays α, β ∈ ∂T we set the distance as ∆(α, β) = 1 2k , where k is the highest number of the level, such that both α and β contain a common vertex in Lk. If such level does not exist, then the rays coincide and we set ∆(α, β) = 0. Then (∂T,∆) is a compact ultrametric space. Let AutTp(v) be the group of automorphisms of the infinite p-adic rooted tree and let P∞ be its Sylow p-subgroup. We have: Proposition 3.1. For every infinite sequence p = {pni}∞ i=1 of positive powers of a prime p the Sylow p-subgroup of AutTp(v) is isomorphic to P∞ ∼= ∞ ≀ i=1 C(i) p . Remark 3.2. We mention that if p = 2 then the Sylow 2-subgroup of AutT2(v) coincides with AutT2(v) if and only if rhe sequence 2 is constant, i.e. 2 = (2, 2, 2, ...). We mention here that P∞ can be alternatively constructed as an inverse limit of the inverse system (Pn, ψn) of Sylow p-subgroups in 24 Kaluzhnin’s representations automorphism groups of finite trees Tp(v, n), with natural projections ψn : Pn+1 →֒ Pn, n ∈ N (acting by neglecting the action on the last level of the tree). We now recall a useful and illustrative notation for elements of AutTp(v) – the portrait of automorphisms of Tp(v). If f ∈ AutTp(v) is an automorphism, then at every level Ln+1 of the tree f acts as a permutation with distinct cycles on every set of descendants of vertices in Ln. This is imposed by the requirement on automorphism to preserve the adjacency of vertices. Hence, at the level Ln+1 one may illustrate the action of f as shown in Fig. 1. L n L n+1 " 1 " 2 " np Figure 1. A part of the portrait of an automorphism f ∈ AutTp(v). Every automorphism f ∈ AutTp(v) acts in a natural way on the boundary ∂Tp(v). Hence AutTp(v) acts on the compact ultrametric space (∂T,∆). Therefore the group AutTp(v) is metrizable in a standard way. Namely, for any two automorphisms f, g ∈ AutTp(v) we put d(f, g) := max α∈∂T (αf , αg). According to this definition the distance d(f, g) = 2−k, where k is the number of the highest level in Tp(v), such that the portraits of automor- phisms f and g are the same on the first k levels of Tp(v). If such a number does not exist, i.e. the automorphisms f and g have identical portraits, then we set d(f, g) = 0. The topology induced on AutTp(v) by the ultrametric d is a standard profinite topology. 4. Residually finite groups as automorphism groups of trees Let G be a countably generated residually finite group and let Σ be a series of subgroups of G: G = G1 ⊇ G2 ⊇ G3 ⊇ ..., (1) A. Bier, V. Sushchansky 25 such that ∞⋂ i=1 Gi = {1} and the factor groups Gi/Gi+1 are finite. We construct the coset rooted tree T (Σ) in the following way. The root corresponds to the whole group G, and for i > 1 the vertices of the i-th level of T (Σ) are the right cosets G/Gi. A vertex Gix of i-th level is connected with a vertex Gi+1y of the i + 1-st level (i > 0), if and only if Gi+1y ⊂ Gix. The constructed rooted tree is level-homogeneous with level indices equal to si = [Gi : Gi+1] (see Fig. 2). As the level indices are finite, T (G) is a locally finite tree. Gx s 1 Gx 2 Gx 1 G G y 1 1 1 1 2 G y 22 G ys2 2 G ys2 2 s1 Figure 2. Construction of a coset tree T (Σ). It is well known that the function δ defined on G by the equation δ(x, y) = 2−k ⇔ xy−1 ∈ Gk \Gk+1, for every x, y ∈ G such that x 6= y and such that δ(x, x) = 0 is a metric on G. It is easy to check that δ is an ultrametric on G. Namely, if x 6= y and δ(x, y) = 2−k then, by definition, xy−1 ∈ Gk \ Gk+1 and hence y−1x = (xy−1)−1 ∈ Gk \ Gk+1, i.e. δ(y, x) = 2−k as well. Moreover, if δ(x, y) = 2−k and δ(y, z) = 2−j then we have xy−1 ∈ Gk \Gk+1 and yz−1 ∈ Gj \Gj+1. From this we get xz−1 = xy−1yz−1 ∈ Gk ∪Gj = Gmin{k,j}. Thus δ(x, z) 6 2− min{k,j} = max{2−k, 2−j} = max{δ(x, y), δ(y, z)} hence the group (G, δ) is an ultrametric space. 26 Kaluzhnin’s representations Now, for every element g ∈ G we define the mapping ϕg : G −→ G with the action ϕg : x 7−→ xg, x ∈ G. It is clear that for any subgroup H 6 G, ϕg maps a right cosetH to the right cosetHg. Let us investigate the action induced by ϕg on the tree T (Σ). Assume Gi = Gi+1 ∪Gi+1h1 ∪ .... be the coset partition of Gi with respect to Gi+1. Then the coset Gigj is adjacent to Gi+1hgj and hence for an arbitrary g ∈ G the images ϕg(Gigj) = Gigjg and ϕg(Gi+1hgj) = Gi+1hgjg are adjacent as well. Thus ϕg induces an automorphism ϕg of the coset tree T (Σ). The described correspondence of elements of G and automorphisms of T (Σ) defines an embedding: θ : G →֒ AutT (Σ), θ(g) = ϕg, g ∈ G. Theorem 4.1. If the series Σ of subgroups G = G1 ⊇ G2 ⊇ G3 ⊇ ... is normal, then the embedding θ : G →֒ AutT (Σ) is continuous and we have G →֒ ∞ ≀ i=1 Gi/Gi+1. Proof. (i) We show that embedding θ is a continuous map of one metric space to the other. Assume that g0 ∈ G and 1 2k < ǫ < 1 2k−1 . Let g be an element of G such that δ(g, g0) 6 ε, i.e. gg−1 0 ∈ Gk \Gk+1. Consider the action of θ(g0) and θ(g) on the tree T (Σ). Since Gi is normal in G we have: gg−1 o ∈ Gi ⇒ Gixgg −1 o = Gix ⇒ Gixg = Gixg0, i.e. θ(g) and θ(g0) act in the same way on the first k levels of T (Σ). It follows that d(θ(g0), θ(g)) 6 1 2k < ε. Thus the embedding θ is continuous. (ii) If g ∈ G then θ(g) = ϕg is an automorphism of the tree T (Σ). Hence we have an embedding θ : G →֒ AutT (Σ) = ∞ ≀ i=1 Sym(Gi/Gi+1. In particular, a right coset Gi+1x ⊂ Gi is mapped onto the right coset Gi+1xg ⊂ Gig. Thus we have θ(G) ⊂ ∞ ≀ i=1 Gi/Gi+1 A. Bier, V. Sushchansky 27 and hence there exists an embedding G →֒ ∞ ≀ i=1 Gi/Gi+1. The above theorem is a generalization of a famous result of Kaluzhnin and Krasner [16, 17]. It yields an important universal property of the automorphism groups AutT of level-homogeneous trees : Corollary 4.2. (i) Every finitely generated residually finite group embeds in AutT for some level-homogeneous tree T . (ii) Every profinite group of countable weight embeds in AutT for some level-homogeneous tree T . In fact one can observe even more. Corollary 4.3. Let κ = (n1, n2, ...) be an increasing sequence of indices. Every finitely generated residually finite group and every profinite group of countable weight embeds in AutTκ. Proof. Let κ = (n1, n2, ...) be the sequence as required, and let G be a finitely generated residually finite group with the descending series of normal subgroups (1). Assume [Gi : Gi+1] = mi, i ∈ N. Then it is possible to choose a subsequence κ′ = (ni1 , ni2 , ...) of κ such that for every j ∈ N we have nij > mj . Then, by Theorem 4.1, group G embeds in AutTκ′ , hence also in AutTκ. If G is a p-group then one finds a sequence Σ of the form (1) with cyclic factors of order p, i.e. [Gi : Gi+1] = p, i ∈ N. Groups possessing such series of subgroups were called p∞ – groups by L. Kaluzhnin [12,15]. The coset tree T (Σ) in this case is a p-adic rooted tree and we have: Corollary 4.4 ([12]). Every p∞-group is embeddable in P∞. From this we have in particular Corollary 4.5. (i) P∞ is universal by embedding in the class of finitely generated residually-p groups. (ii) P∞ is universal by embedding in the class of pro-p groups of count- able weight. 28 Kaluzhnin’s representations Remark 4.6. The group P∞ is not the unique group with the universal property described in Corollary 4.5. In [12] the author gives as the simplest example the direct product G = P∞ × Cp of P∞ with a cyclic group of order p. Then G has the universal property as it contains P∞. However, it is not isomorphic to P∞ since G has a nontrivial center, while P∞ is centerless. 5. Elements of P∞ as infinite sequences of reduced polynomials Following Kaluzhnin’s ideas in [13] we introduce a practical notation for elements of the Sylow p-subgroup P∞. Namely, every u ∈ P∞ may be represented as an infinite sequence (tableau) of reduced polynomials: u = [a1, a2(x1), a3(x1, x2), ...], where a1 ∈ Zp, an(x1, x2, ..., xn−1)∈Zp[x1, x2, ..., xn−1]/〈xp 1−x1, ..., x p n−1−xn−1〉 for n>2. Here 〈xp 1 − x1, ..., x p n−1 − xn−1〉 denotes the ideal of Zp[x1, x2, ..., xn−1] generated by xp i − xi, 1 6 i < n. For example, the identity automorphism is represented by a table with all coordinates equal to zero. If the first s − 1 coordinates in the table u are zeros, and the s-th coordinate is nonzero, then u is said to have depth s. For every automorphism in P∞ defined by the portrait, one can find its corresponding table representation applying the following procedure. Let f ∈ P∞ be an automorphism of the tree Tp(v), given by its portrait. First we label every vertex of the level Lk with a uniquely assigned base p number with k digits in such a way that the ancestor in level Lk−r of a given vertex v ∈ Lk is assigned a base p number being the first k − r digits of the label of v. At given level, f acts on descendants of a vertex by permutation. Hence the action of f on level Lk+1 is given by a sequence of pk permutations, all of these being powers of a fixed p-cycle α ∈ Sp. The portrait on level Lk+1 can be characterized by the sequence (αs1 , αs2 , ..., α s pk ), or simply the sequence of exponents (s1, s2, ..., spk), 0 6 si < p. Thus the action of f on the k + 1-st level of Tp(v) is determined by a function, which assigns to every vertex vi in Lk the respective exponent si. In particular, we define this function as fk : Zp pk −→ Zp. It is known that every such function can be thought A. Bier, V. Sushchansky 29 as a reduced polynomial over Zp. Then f is represented by the table f = [f1, f2, ...]. For instance, we construct the tables of the generators of the (first) Grigorchuk group [5]. The group is generated by the four automorphisms of the binary tree T2: a, b, c and d with portraits presented in Fig. 3. (a) Portrait of automorphism a. (b) Portrait of automorphism b. (c) Portrait of automorphism c. (d) Portrait of automorphism d. Figure 3. Portraits of generators of the first Grigorchuk group. The tables that correspond to automorphisms of T2 consist of polyno- mials over Z2 reduced by the ideals 〈x2 1 − x1, ..., x 2 n − xn〉. In particular, the generators a, b, c and d can be presented as follows: a = [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, . . .], b = [0, α2(x1), α3(x2), 0, α5(x4), α6(x5), 0, . . .], c = [0, α2(x1), 0, α4(x3), α5(x4), 0, α7(x6), . . .], d = [0, 0, α3(x2), α4(x3), 0, α6(x5), α7(x6), . . .], where αn+1(xn) = αn+1(x1, x2, . . . , xn) = x1x2...xn−1(xn + 1). For every n ∈ N the reduced polynomial an(x1, x2, ..., xn−1) is a sum of monomials of the type m(x1, x2, ..., xn−1) = axǫ1 1 x ǫ2 2 ...x ǫn−1 n−1 , where a ∈ Z ∗ p and 0 6 ǫi < p, i = 1, 2, ..., n − 1. Given a nonzero monomial m(x1, x2, ..., xn−1) ∈ Zp[x1, ..., xn−1]/〈xp 1 − x1, ..., x p n−1 − xn−1〉 we define its height h(m) to be equal h(m) = 1 + ǫ1 + ǫ2 · p+ ...+ ǫn−1 · pn−2, and we set h(0) = 0. Then for any reduced polynomial a(x1, x2, ..., xn−1) ∈ Zp[x1, ..., xn−1]/〈xp 1 − x1, ..., x p n−1 − xn−1〉 we define the height h(a) to be the greatest height of all component monomials in a. 30 Kaluzhnin’s representations The table notation of elements of P∞ is especially useful for com- putations in the group. In particular, if u, v ∈ P∞ are automorphisms represented by the tables u = [a1, a2(x1), a3(x1, x2), ...], v = [b1, b2(x1), b3(x1, x2), ...], then their product uv is given by the table uv = [c1, c2(x1), c3(x1, x2), ...] with coordinates cs(x1, ..., xs−1) = as(x1, x2, ..., xs−1) + bs ((x1, x2, ..., xs−1)u) , s > 1, where (x1, x2, ..., xs1 )u = (x1−a1, x2−a2(x1), ..., xs−1−as−1(x1, ..., xs−2)). In the following by ui, i > 1, we denote the beginning of length i of the table u, i.e. ui = [a1, a2(x1), a3(x1, x2), ..., ai(x1, ..., xi−1)]. Below we list some results obtained by L. Kaluzhnin in [13] for the group Pn of tables with n coordinates. The same arguments suffice to show the analogous properties of infinite tables from P∞. Lemma 5.1. (i) For every reduced polynomial f(x1, ..., xs) and every table u ∈ Ps+1 the inequality holds: h(f − fu) < h(f). In particular, if h(f) = k there exists at least one element u ∈ Ps+1 such that the polynomial f(x1, ..., xs) − f((x1, ..., xs) u) has height equal to k − 1. (ii) For every reduced polynomial f(x1, ..., xs) and every table u ∈ Ps+1 of depth r the following inequality holds: h(f − fu) 6 ps − pr. In particular, for every f there exists at least one element u ∈ Ps+1 of depth r such that the polynomial f(x1, ..., xs) − f((x1, ..., xs) u) has height equal to ps − pr. (iii) Given an element u ∈ Ps+1 and a reduced polynomial u(x1, ..., xs) ∈ Zp[x1, ..., xs]/〈xp 1 − x1, ..., x p s − xs〉 the equation f(x1, ..., xs) − f((x1, ..., xs)u) = g(x1, ..., xs) has a solution f ∈ Zp[x1, ..., xs]/〈xp 1 − x1, ..., x p s − xs〉 and u ∈ Ps+1 if and only if the sum of values of g(x1, ..., xs) is zero in every orbit of u. A. Bier, V. Sushchansky 31 In the following [u]i, 1 6 1 < n, denotes the i-th coordinate of the table u ∈ Pn. Lemma 5.2. Let u and v be two elements of Ps+1 given by u = [a1, a2(x1), ..., as+1(x1, x2, ...xs)] v = [b1, b2(x1), ..., bs+1(x1, x2, ..., xs)]. (i) The conjugate uv = vuv−1 is represented by the table with coordi- nates given as follows: [uv]i = ai((x1, ..., xi−1)vi+ +bi(x1, ..., xi−1) − bi((x1, ..., xi−1)uv i ). (ii) For every table u ∈ Ps+1 of depth r there exists at least one table v ∈ Ps+1 such that h([vuv−1]i) > pi−1 − pr for every i > r + 1. (iii) The commutator [u, v] = uvu−1v−1 is represented by the table with coordinates given as follows: [uvu−1v−1]i = ai((x1, ..., xi−1) − ai((x1, ..., xi−1)vu i )+ +bi((x1, ..., xi−1)ui)+ −bi((x1, ..., xi−1)(uvu−1v−1)i). (iv) The height of each coordinate of the commutator [u, v] satisfies the inequality: h([u, v]i) < min{h([u]i), h([v]i)} or it is equal to 0. For every element u ∈ Ps+1 there exists at least one element v ∈ Ps+1 such that h([u, v]i) = h([u]i) − 1. Lemmata 5.1 and 5.2 can be easily verified by direct calculations. For detailed proofs of both lemmas we refer the reader to [13]. 6. Ideal subgroups of P∞ Using the concept of height in the set of all sequences in P∞ we introduce a partial order � on P∞ as follows. For any two elements u = [a1, a2(x1), ...] and v = [b1, b2(x1), ...] from P∞ we set u � v ⇔ h(ai) 6 h(bi) for all i ∈ N. 32 Kaluzhnin’s representations One verifies directly that � is a partial order in P∞. We recall that an ideal of a partially ordered set (X,6) is a nonempty subset I ⊂ X satisfying the following two conditions: (i) For every x ∈ I, if y 6 x then y ∈ I; (ii) For every x, y ∈ I there exists z ∈ I, such that x 6 z and y 6 z. Given an infinite sequence of nonnegative integers h = (hi) ∞ i=1, 0 6 hi < pi, in P∞ we consider the ideal subset P (h) = {u ∈ P∞ | h(ai) 6 hi, i ∈ N}. It is easy to see that P (h) is a subgroup of P∞, which we call the ideal subgroup of P∞. We note that ideal subgroups were originally introduced by L. Kaluzhnin in [13], who called them parallelotopic subgroups. We present an alternative construction of the ideal subgroups. Let H be an ideal subgroup, and let u be one of the maximal tables with respect to � in H. By Hn we denote the subgroup of P∞, containing all tables which have a unique nonzero coordinate in the n-th place and its height does not exceed the height of [u]i: Hn = {w ∈ P∞ | [w]i = 0 ∧ h([w]i) 6 h([u]i) for i 6= n}. Then H = ∞∏ n=1 Hn, i.e. H is the closure of the direct product of subgroup Hn, n ∈ N. Theorem 6.1. (i) Every ideal subgroup is closed in the profinite topology on P∞. (ii) All ideal subgroups of P∞ constitute a distributive sublattice in the lattice of all subgroups of P∞. Proof. (i) Observe first that P∞ is a topological group with the topology inherited from AutTp. The basis of neighborhoods of the identity in this topology consists of subgroups Ds, s ∈ N, defined as follows: Ds = {u ∈ P∞ | ui = 0 for i = 1, 2, ..., s}. (2) All the subgroups Ds and their translations f · Ds, f ∈ P∞ are open. Moreover, the subgroup Ds is the stabiliser of the s-th level of the tree Tp. A. Bier, V. Sushchansky 33 Now, if P (h) is an ideal subgroup of P∞ defined by an infinite sequence h = {hi} ∞ i=1, then P (h) = P∞ \ ∞⋃ s=1 ⋃ f∗ s ∈P∞ f∗ s · Ds, where f∗ s is a table from P∞ such that there exist a coordinate fi, 1 6 i 6 s with h(fi) > hi. Thus P (h) is closed. (ii) Let h = (hi) ∞ i=1 and h′ = (h′ i) ∞ i=1, 0 6 hi, h ′ i < pi, be two infinite sequences of nonnegative integers, and let P (h) and P (h′) be the respective ideal subgroups defined by these sequences. Observe that if h � h′ then every element of P (h) is contained in P (h′) by the definition of the ideal. Thus P (h) 6 P (h′). Moreover, in any case we have that h ∨ h′ = t for t = {ti} ∞ i=1, where ti = max{hi, h ′ i}, i ∈ N; and h ∧ h′ = m for m = {mi} ∞ i=1, where mi = min{hi, h ′ i}, i ∈ N. Thus the second statement of the theorem follows. The normality criterion obtained in [13] for ideal subgroups of the finite groups Pm translates easily to the subgroups of P∞: Theorem 6.2 ([14]). An ideal subgroup P (h) of depth r, defined by an infinite sequence of nonnegative integers h = (hi) ∞ i=1 is normal in P∞ if and only if for every i ∈ N the following inequality is satisfied: hi > pi−1 − pr, for all i > r + 1. Proof. Let H = P (h) be a normal ideal subgroup of P∞ of depth r, and let Ds, s ∈ N be the subgroups defined in (2). Direct calculations show that for every s ∈ N the subgroup Ds is normal in P∞ and hence H · Ds is normal in P∞ as well. Therefore H · Ds/Ds is normal in P∞/Ds ∼= Ps of depth r. In [13] the author characterized all normal ideal subgroups of Ps as ideal subgroups P (h1, h2, ..., hs) 6 Ps with hi > pi−1 − pr, where r is the depth of the ideal subgroup. Therefore we have H · Ds/Ds ∼= P (h1, h2, ..., hs) for every s ∈ N and thus H = P (h) with hi > pi−1 − pr, i ∈ N. Conversely, assume H = P (h) to be an ideal subgroup of depth r defined by a sequence h = (hi) ∞ i=1 satisfying hi > pi−1 − pr. Then clearly H ·Ds/Ds ∼= P (h1, h2, ..., hs) is a normal subgroup of P∞/Ds, and therefore H · Ds E P∞ for every s ∈ N. Thus the intersection ⋂ s∈N H · Ds = H is also normal in P∞. 34 Kaluzhnin’s representations 7. Lower central series of P∞ Knowing the form of commutators (see Lemma 5.2), it is possible to characterize all terms of the lower central series in P∞. Namely Theorem 7.1 ([14]). The k-th term γk(P∞) of the lower central series in P∞ coincides with a normal ideal subgroup P (h) defined by the sequence h = (hi) ∞ i=1, where hi = max{0, pi−1 − k}. Proof. For k = 1 the description is valid. Assume then that the theorem holds for all terms of the lower central series up till the k-th term. Consider the k + 1-st term γk+1(P∞). By definition γk+1(P∞) is generated by the commutators of the form [u, v], where u ∈ γk(P∞) and v ∈ P∞. Take u = [0, 0, ..., 0, ai(x1, ..., xi−1), 0, 0, ...]. It follows from Lemma 5.2 and our inductive assumption that h([u, v]i) < h(u) 6 max{0, pi−1 − k}, hence h([u, v]i) 6 max{0, pi−1 −(k+1)}. Moreover, there always exists an element v ∈ P∞ such that if only [u, v]i 6= 0 then h([u, v]i) = pi−1 −(k+1). Therefore γk+1(P∞) contains every subgroup Hi = {w ∈ P∞ | h([w]i) 6 pi−1 − (k + 1) ∧ [w]j = 0 for j 6= i}, and thus every product of elements of this type. It follows that γk+1(P∞) ⊇ ∞∏ n=1 Hn and, since γk+1(P∞) is closed in P∞, we have γk+1(P∞) = ∞∏ n=1 Hn = P (h), where h = (hi) ∞ i=1, where hi = max{0, pi−1 − k}. The above theorem is analogous to the respective characterization of the lower central series in groups Pn, n ∈ N given in [13] by L. Kaluzhnin. In particular, the derived subgroup P ′ ∞ = γ2(P∞) = [P∞, P∞] is the ideal subgroup P (h) defined by the sequence h = (0, p− 2, p2 − 2, p3 − 2, . . . , pi−1 − 2, . . .). From Theorem 7.1 we deduce a couple of observations. Corollary 7.2. Every factor group γk(P∞)/γk+1(P∞) is a continual elementary abelian group. A. Bier, V. Sushchansky 35 Proof. One verifies directly, that every element of the factor group γk(P∞)/γk+1(P∞) is an infinite sequence (a1, a2, ...) where ai ∈ Zp for i ∈ N. Moreover, the group operation for such sequences is simply the coordinate-wise addition. Hence γk(P∞)/γk+1(P∞) ∼= Z ∞ p , as stated. Corollary 7.3. P∞ is infinitely generated as a topological group. Proof. Let us observe that P∞/P ′ ∞ is a topological group with the quotient topology induced from P∞. As P∞/P ′ ∞ ∼= Z ∞ p then P∞/P ′ ∞ is not finitely generated as a topological group. The statement of the corollary follows. 8. Isometrically characteristic subgroups of P∞ For the discussion on characteristic subgroups, we first recall some known results on automorphism group of P∞. The groups of automor- phisms of the groups Pn and P∞ were investigated in [3, 18–20]. In the paper [20] the author characterizes all isometric automorphisms of the group P∞, i.e. automorphisms preserving the basic sets Ds. In order to formulate the main result of the recalled paper we first introduce the notion of a scalar automorphism. Let w̄ = {w1, w2, ...} be an infinite sequence of integers, wi ∈ Zp, i ∈ N. The automorphism ω of P∞, defined by the rule: ω([a1, a2(x1), ...]) = [w1a1, w2a2(x1w −1 1 ), w3a3(x1w −1 1 , x2w −1 2 ), ...] for any [a1, a2(x1), ...] ∈ P∞, is called a scalar automorphism. We denote the set of all scalar automorphisms in P∞ by Ω∞. If p = 2 then Ω∞ is trivial. The subgroup of all inner automorphisms of P∞ will be denoted by InnP∞. Lemma 8.1 ([20]). The subgroup Autis(P∞) of isometric automorphisms of P∞ is decomposable into a general product of subgroups of inner and scalar automorphisms: Autis(P∞) = Ω∞ · InnP∞. In this section we consider subgroups of P∞, which are invariant to the isometric automorphisms. Subgroups of this kind were first discussed by L. Kaluzhnin in the paper [14]. We recall here the results and include a proof. 36 Kaluzhnin’s representations Theorem 8.2 ([14]). Let p 6= 2. Then: (i) Every normal ideal subgroup of P∞ is invariant to all isometric automorphisms. (ii) Every subgroup of P∞ which is invariant to all isometric automor- phisms, is a normal ideal subgroup. Proof. (i) Let H = P (h) to be a normal ideal subgroup of depth r of P∞. From Theorem 6.2 it follows that H is defined by a sequence h = (hi) ∞ i=1 such that for every i > r we have hi > pi−1 − pr. It is enough to check the invariancy of H with respect to scalar automorphisms form Ω∞. Let ω ∈ Ω∞ be a scalar automorphism defined by a sequence of scalars w̄ = {w1, w2, ...}, wi ∈ Zp, i ∈ N. Then, by definition, for every table u = [a1, a2(x1), a3(x1, x2), ...] ∈ P∞ we have ω([a1, a2(x1), ...]) = [w1a1, w2a2(x1w −1 1 ), w3a3(x1w −1 1 , x2w −1 2 ), ...], and hence h(ω(u)) = h(u). Thus ω(u) ∈ H, as stated. (ii) Let H be a subgroup of P∞ which is invariant to all isometric automorphisms and let α ∈ Autis P∞. Then, as Ds for s ∈ N are invariant to isometric automorphisms, then α(H ·Ds) ⊂ H ·Ds. Moreover, α induces an automorphism ᾱ of P∞/Ds ∼= Ps which by its isometric property, maps table u = [a1, a2(x1), a3(x1, x2), ..., as(x1, ..., xs)] ∈ H · Ds/Ds to a table ᾱ(u) ∈ H ·Ds/Ds. Hence,H ·Ds/Ds is isomorphic to a subgroup Hs of Ps invariant to ᾱ for every ᾱ induced by an isometric automorphism of P∞. By the results of L. Kaluznin from [13] we deduce that Hs is a normal ideal subgroup of Ps. It follows that both subgroups H · Ds and H are normal ideal subgroups of P∞. From the above theorem and Theorem 6.1 it follows directly: Corollary 8.3. If p 6= 2 then every subgroup of P∞ which is invariant to all isometric automorphisms is closed. Whether there exist characteristic subgroups of P∞ which are not closed remains an interesting question to investigate, posed by Kaluzhnin in [14]. A. Bier, V. Sushchansky 37 References [1] M. Abert, B. Virag, Dimension and randomness in groups acting on rooted trees, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18 (2005), 157–192 [2] L. Bartholdi, R. Grigorchuk, Z. S̆unic, Branch groups. Handbook of algebra, Vol. 3, 989–1112, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2003. [3] Yu. Bodnarchuk, Structure of the group of automorphisms of Sylow p-subgroup of symmetric group of degree pn (p 6= 2), Ukr. Math. Zh. 36 (1984) no.6, 688–694 [4] T. Ceccherini-Silberstein, Yu. Leonov, F. Scarabotti, F. Tolli, Generalized Kalouj- nine groups, uniseriality and height of automorphisms, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 15 (2005), no. 3, 503–527 [5] R. Grigorchuk, On Burnside’s problem on periodic groups. (Russian) Funktsionalyi Analiz i ego Prilozheniya, vol. 14 (1980), 53-–54. [6] R. Grigorchuk, Some problems of the dynamics of group actions on rooted trees, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 273 (2011), no. 1, 64–175 [7] R. Grigorchuk, V. Nekrashevich, V. Sushchanskii, Automata, dynamical systems, and groups. (Russian) Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 231 (2000) 134–214 [8] L. Kaluzhnin, Sur les p-groupes de Sylow de groupe symetrique du degre pm, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 221 (1945), 222–224 [9] L. Kaluzhnin, La structure du p-groupe de Sylow du groupe symétrique du degré p2, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 222 (1946), 1424–1425 [10] L. Kaluzhnin, Sur les p-groupes de Sylow du groupe symétrique du degré pm. (Suite centrale ascendante et descendante.), C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 223 (1946), 703-–705. [11] L. Kaluzhnin, Sur les p -groupes de Sylow du groupe symétrique de degré pm. (Sous-groupes caractéristiques, sous-groupes parallélotopiques), C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 224 (1947), 253–255 [12] L. Kaluzhnin, Sur le groupe P∞ des tableaux infinis, C. R. Math. Rep. Acad. Sci. 224 (1947), 1097–1092 [13] L. Kaluzhnin, La structure des p-groupes de Sylow des groupes symetriques finis, Ann. Sci. l’Ecole Norm. Sup. 65 (1948), 239–276 [14] L. Kaluzhnin, On a generalisation of Sylow p-subgroups of symmetric groups, (Russian), Acta Math. Acad. Sci. Hungar. 2 (1951), 197–221 [15] L. Kaluzhnin, P. Beleckij, V. Fejnberg, Kranzprodukte.(German) [Wreath products] With English, French and Russian summaries. Teubner Texts in Mathematics 101. BSB B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, 1987. [16] M. Krasner, L. Kaluzhnin, Produit complet des groupes de permutations et probleme d’extension de groupes. I, Acta Sci. Math. Szeged 13 (1950), 208–230 [17] M. Krasner, L. Kaluzhnin, Produit complet des groupes de permutations et probleme d’extension de groupes. II, Acta Sci. Math. Szeged 14 (1951), 39–66 [18] P. Lentoudis, Détermination du groupe des automorphismes du p-groupe de Sylow du groupe symétrique de degré pm: l’idée de la méthode., C. R. Math. Rep. Acad. Sci. Canada 7 (1985), 67–71 38 Kaluzhnin’s representations [19] P. Lentoudis, Le groupe des automorphismes du p-groupe de Sylow du groupe symétrique de degré pm: résultats., C. R. Math. Rep. Acad. Sci. Canada 7 (1985), 133–136 [20] P. Lentoudis, Le groupe des automorphismes isométriques du groupe P∞ des tableaux de rang infini.", C. R. Math. Rep. Acad. Sci. Canada 7 (1985), no. 4, 233–237 [21] S. Sidki, Regular trees and their automorphisms, IMPA Rio de Janeiro (1998) [22] V. I. Sushchansky, Representation of residually finite p-groups by isometries of the space of p-adic integers, Dokl. Akad. Nauk Ukrain. SSR Ser. A no.5 (1986), 23–26 Contact information A. Bier, V. Sushchansky Institute of Mathematics Silesian University of Technology ul. Kaszubska 23, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland E-Mail(s): agnieszka.bier@polsl.pl, vitaliy.sushchanskyy@polsl.pl Received by the editors: 09.03.2015 and in final form 09.03.2015.