Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA

It is shown that spermatozoa of Drosophila melanogaster can transfer molecules of exogenous DNA (or their fragments) from a solution of this DNA injected into the haemocel of an adult male into the ooplasm of the egg. As a result, mutations induced in the descendants arise both in the paternal and t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:1994
Hauptverfasser: Gershenson, S.M., Alexandrov, Yu.N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України 1994
Schriftenreihe:Биополимеры и клетка
Online Zugang:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/154712
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA / S.M. Gershenson, Yu.N. Alexandrov // Биополимеры и клетка. — 1994. — Т. 10, № 2. — С. 5-10. — Бібліогр.: 18 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-154712
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1547122020-10-11T00:46:10Z Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA Gershenson, S.M. Alexandrov, Yu.N. It is shown that spermatozoa of Drosophila melanogaster can transfer molecules of exogenous DNA (or their fragments) from a solution of this DNA injected into the haemocel of an adult male into the ooplasm of the egg. As a result, mutations induced in the descendants arise both in the paternal and the maternal chromosomes obtained by them. The mutagenic effect of exogenous DNA has a prolonged character inducing mutations in the descendants during many cell generations after DNA-treatment of their father. The mechanism of such a prolongation of the mutagenic action of DNA is discussed. Выявлено, що сперматозоїди самця Drosophila melanogaster здатні переносити до ооплазми запліднюючого яйця молекули екзогенної ДНК (або їxнi фрагменти) з розчину цієї ДНК, що введений до гемоцелі самця; внаслідок цього індуковані ДНК мутації виникають у нащадків у хромосомах, одержаних як від батька, так i від матеpi. Показано, що мутагенна дія екзогенної ДНК має пролонгований характер i індукує у нащадків мутації протягом ряду клітинни поколінь. Обговорюється вірогідний механізм такої пролонгованої дії. Выявлено, что сперматозоиды самца Drosophila melanogaster способны переносить в ооплазмы оплодотворяющего яйца молекулы экзогенной ДНК (или иx фрагменты) из раствора другой ДНК, введен в гемоцели самца; вследствие этого индуцированные ДНК мутации возникают у потомков в хромосомах, полученных как от отца, так и от матеpи. Показано, что мутагенное действие экзогенной ДНК имеет пролонгированный характер и индуцирует у потомков мутации течение ряда клеточных поколений. обсуждается возможный механизм такой пролонгированного действия. 1994 Article Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA / S.M. Gershenson, Yu.N. Alexandrov // Биополимеры и клетка. — 1994. — Т. 10, № 2. — С. 5-10. — Бібліогр.: 18 назв. — англ. 0233-7657 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7124/bc.00039B http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/154712 577.1 en Биополимеры и клетка Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description It is shown that spermatozoa of Drosophila melanogaster can transfer molecules of exogenous DNA (or their fragments) from a solution of this DNA injected into the haemocel of an adult male into the ooplasm of the egg. As a result, mutations induced in the descendants arise both in the paternal and the maternal chromosomes obtained by them. The mutagenic effect of exogenous DNA has a prolonged character inducing mutations in the descendants during many cell generations after DNA-treatment of their father. The mechanism of such a prolongation of the mutagenic action of DNA is discussed.
format Article
author Gershenson, S.M.
Alexandrov, Yu.N.
spellingShingle Gershenson, S.M.
Alexandrov, Yu.N.
Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA
Биополимеры и клетка
author_facet Gershenson, S.M.
Alexandrov, Yu.N.
author_sort Gershenson, S.M.
title Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA
title_short Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA
title_full Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA
title_fullStr Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA
title_full_unstemmed Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA
title_sort some new data concerning the mutagenic action of dna
publisher Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України
publishDate 1994
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/154712
citation_txt Some new data concerning the mutagenic action of DNA / S.M. Gershenson, Yu.N. Alexandrov // Биополимеры и клетка. — 1994. — Т. 10, № 2. — С. 5-10. — Бібліогр.: 18 назв. — англ.
series Биополимеры и клетка
work_keys_str_mv AT gershensonsm somenewdataconcerningthemutagenicactionofdna
AT alexandrovyun somenewdataconcerningthemutagenicactionofdna
first_indexed 2025-07-14T06:44:10Z
last_indexed 2025-07-14T06:44:10Z
_version_ 1837603698806620160
fulltext 577.1 S. M. Gershenson. Yu. N. Alexandrov SOME NEW DATA CONCERNING THE MUTAGENIC ACTION OF DNA // is shown that spermatozoa of Drosophila melanogaster can transfer molecules of exo­ genous DNA (or their fragments) from a solution of this DNA injected into the haemo- cel of an adult male into the ooplasm of the egg. As a result, mutations induced in the descendants arise both in the paternal and the maternal chromosomes obtained by them. The mutagenic effect of exogenous DNA has a prolonged character inducing mutations in the descendants during many cell generations after DNA-treatment of their father. The mechanism of such a prolongation of the mutagenic action of DNA is discussed. In our previous experiments [1, 2] on the induction of recessive lethal mutations in the 2nd chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster by injec­ tions of a solution of exogenous DNA into the haemocel of adult males we found that the frequency of induced lethal in the progeny which deve­ loped from eggs laid by the female fertilized by a DNA-treated male du­ ring the first three days after copulation was in most cases only slightly different from the frequency of such mutations in the progeny which de­ veloped from eggs laid later. This surprised us as it meant that DNA can induce mutations not only in the dividing premeiotic germ cells of the males but also in their completely formed ripe spermatozoa. This was later confirmed by the results of an experiment in which DNA-treated males were immediately after their first copulation separated from the females with which they have copulated, so that we could be certain that the eggs laid by the females were fertilized by spermatozoa which were in contact with exogenous DNA already being ripe. The frequency of lethals induced by DNA was here again significantly higher than in the untreated control. In seems utterly unbelievable that very large DNA molecules present in the solution injected into the haemocel of the male can penetrate into the tightly compressed nucleus forming the head of the spermatozoan. Much more probable is that DNA molecules are adsorbed on the surface of the spermatozoan and thus are purely mechanically transported and introduced into the ooplasm of the fertilized egg where they reach both. the male and female pronuclei and eventually the paternal and maternal chromosomes in them. If this supposition is correct then exogenous DNA injected into the male should induce mutations in chromosomes received by the descen­ dants both form their treated father and their untreated mother. In fa­ vour of this supposition speaks the experiment described in 1971 by Brac- kett et al. [3]; it showed that mammalian spermatozoa can introduce into the egg DNA molecules adsorbed by them from the surrounding fluid. Recently this has been confirmed by Lavitrano et al. [4] and by Siracuso et al. [5]; their experiments showed, for example, that murine spermato­ zoa, incubated in an isotopic buffer containing an exogenous DNA (the plasmid pSV2 CAT) are introduced into eggs fertilized by them. Embry­ os thus obtained were implanted into pseudo-pregnant females and among 250 descendants of these females about a third contained in their genomic DNA nucleotide sequences of the above-mentioned plasmid. And when © S. M. Gershenson, Yu. N. /Uexandrov, 1994 ISSN 0233-7657. БИОПОЛИМЕРЫ И КЛЕТКА. 1994. Т. 10. № 2 5 transgenic females were crossed with CD1 males the gene CAT was ex­ pressed in the bones and tails of their descendants. In all, these authors had proved that such a transport of exogenous DNA into the ooplasm can be achieved by spermatozoa of mice, bulls and man; and it is quite probable ihat this can place in insects. To check this hypothesis we carried out an experiment using as mar­ kers the following mutant genes located in the 2nd chromosome of D. melanogaster — Curly (Cy), Bristle (Bl), Lobe2 (L2), black (b) and cin­ nabar (en). Calf thymus DNA was dissolved in saline and injected (ca. Ю.07—0.09 micrograms of DNA in 0.25 ml of fluid per male) into the haemocel of heterozygous males having one of its 2nd chromosomes mar­ ked with Cy and Bl and the other with en (Cy Bl/cn). These males were crossed with virgin heterozygous females having one of its 2nd chromo­ somes marked with Cy and the other with b(Cy/b). The Fi from these crosses consisted of flies including two Curly classes, Cy/cn and Cy/b which can be easily distinguished one from another. Each of the Fi Cy Bl/b males was individually crossed with a virgin Cy/L2 female and their F2 descendants were inbred, this allowing to detect in the F3 recessive lethal mutations which had arisen in the 2nd chromosome of their untre­ ated grandmother (in this case no black flies will be present in the F3). Likewise, each of the Fi Cy/cn males was individually crossed with a vir­ gin Cy/L2 female and their F2 descendants were inbred, this allowing to jdetect in the F3 recessive lethal mutations which had arise in the 2nd chromosome of their DNA-treated grandfather (in this case no cinnabar flies will be present in the F3). The results of this experiment is presented in Table 1. As shown in this table, the frequency of recessive lethal mutations in the paternal and the maternal chromosome is about the same, exceeding about ten times the frequency of such mutations which spontaneously arose in the untre­ ated control. This allows us to be rather certain that the induced mutati­ ons arose not in ripe spermatozoa but in the chromosomes of both pro­ nuclei (paternal and maternal) contained in the fertilized egg. (A similar experiment was performed on lethals induced in the 2nd chromosome by the synthetic polyribonucleotide poly (A, U). This experiment also showen that the mutagen can be carried by spermatozoa to the female pronucleus. The number of lethals induced in the paternal (5.73 %f) and the maternal (4.50 %) chromosome of Fi flies was nearly equal.) However, as this experiment was carried out on a relatively modest scale this conclusion is only preliminary and needs a repetition on a lar­ ger scale. In one of the experiments of Fahmy and Fahmy [6].. in which exoge­ nous DNA was injected into adult Drosophila males, a statistically sig­ nificant increase was observed among Fi females of the mutability of the garnet locus in the X chromosome received from their mother and not from the DNA-treated father. These authors assume that here the exo­ genous DNA injected into the father was passively transmitted by the spermatozoa to his daughters. We are inclined to regard this case as speaking for the correctness of our conclusion based on the data presented in Table 1. T a b l e i Recessive lethal mutations induced in the 2nd chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster in experiments on transportation of DNA molecules by spermatozoa into the egg Source of chromosomes Number of chromosomes tested Number of induced lethals Percentage of lethals Paternal 204 8 3.9±1.4 and 1 miniature mutation Maternal 178 6 3.3±1.34 Control (no treatment) 235 1 0.4±0.4 6 ISSN 0233-7657. БИОПОЛИМЕРЫ И КЛЕТКА. 1994. Т. 10. № 2 Already in our first experiments [7] on the induction of mutations in D. melanogaster by exogenous DNA it was found that the mutagenic action of DNA is often not immediate but considerably delayed so that many mutations in the Fi of DNA-treated males appear as mosaic indi­ viduals. As was shown by these experiments and numerous later ones, some gene mutations induced by exogenous DNA added to the food of D. melanogaster larvae or injected into the haemocel of adult males ap­ pear in the Fi as buches of mutants (this showing that the arose in pre- meiotic germ cells of the male) or as whole (non-mosaic) individuals but many of them, usually more than 50 per cent, appear as mosaic in which only 1/2, 1/4 or a lesser part of their body consists of mutant tis­ sues. For example, in the Fi of some such experiments among 13 247 flies 27 visible gene mutations were found twenty of which appeared as mosa­ ics (chiefly 1/2 or 1/4 mosaics). This group included flies manifesting phenotypical mosaicism (e. g. with one normal and one miniature wings) which had mosaic gonads; and also it included some phenotypically whole mutant (non-mosaic flies which had mosaic gonads [8]). On Table 2 are shown the results of crossing such Fi mosaic males with virgin attached-X females. Other mosaic males in this and other similar experiments gave analogous results. To the 20 mosaic flies in this experimental series a number of phenotypically mosaic flies probably should be added which gave no offspring or gave only wild-type descendants and therefore were not registered as mutants. A preponderance of mosaic mutants over whole ones was characteris­ tic not only of sex-linked visible mutations but also of autosomal ones •and was observed in our experiments not only in the Fi but in the F2 and F3 as well. Many Fi mosaics in which «the mutant part was ca 1/4 of the body |or less must have arisen as a result of mutation which took place two or more cell generations after the direct treatment of DNA had stopped. But the mutagenic effect of DNA may be manifested even later. We have shown in our experiments that the mutagenic effect of DNA is evident not only in the Fi but also in the F2 and the F3 though in the latter it is somewhat weaker; so it is still present several dozens of cell generations after the cessation of the treatment. In some cases the same gene mutation arose in different generations of descendants originating from a single treated male. Thus, in one of our experiments a mosaic miniature male was found in the Fi; this male was crossed with an attached-X female and some of their sons were mi­ niature and other had wild-type wings, this being a result of mosaicism of the father's gonads. One of the wild-type sons had deformed eyes and in order to analyse this deformity the male was crossed with an atta­ ched-X female. The deformed eye proved to be non-hereditary but among the offspring of this cross a single mosaic miniature male again appeared from which a pure miniature stock was later established. A similar pic­ ture was observed in the progeny of a mosaic rudimentary male and ru­ dimentary mosaics and whole rudimentary males continued to appear un- till the F6. A pedigree of this family is given in Fig. In another of our experiments an Fi male was a fused mutant. In the offspring of its wild-type male brother again a fused mutant was fo- T a b l e 2 Offspring of mosaic mutants of Drosophila melanogaster; the mutations were induced by exogenous DNA Mutation Phenotype of father Offspring s? Mutant Wild- type Miniature Both wings mutant 101 86 24 Miniature One wing mutant 27 4 38 Small-wing Both wings mutant 70 3 25 ISSN 0233-7657. БИОПОЛИМЕРЫ И КЛЕТКА. 1994. Т. 10. № 2 7 und; it was a mosaic both in respect of wings and gonads. Such cases show that treatment with exogenous DNA leads to the appearance of a transmittable unstability of certain genes. In one case the mutant nature of an F{ fly could be ascertained only because it was a mosaic. This fly, a male, carried a dominant autosomal mutations which we named Beaded-crossveinless (its phenotype remin­ ded both the well known Beaded and the crossveinless mutations of D. melanogaster). When crossed with an attached-X female it gave a pro­ geny consisting of 67 flies among which 9 females and 11 males were Part of a pedigree in which rudimentary mutations appeared among the descendants of a mutant male in which the mutation was induced by exogenous DNA Beaded-crossveinless. Both saxes of these mutants had underdeveloped gonads and were completely steril. Evidently, their mutant father has been a mosaic the fertility of which was due to the presence in his body of normal non-mutant tissues. We did not study mosaicism among recessive lethal mutations indu­ ced by DNA but Mathew [9] and Khan and Alderson [10] used a gene­ tic technique which allowed to detect in such experiments not only com­ plete (non-mosaic) lethals but mosaic ones as well. The proportion of •mosaic was here even higher than in our experiments on the induction of visible mutations. In many treated lines Fi mosaics again produced mosaics in the F2 and so on, up to F5 (in the experiments of Khan and Alderson) and even to F9 (in experiments of Mathew). The extension of the mutagenic effect of DNA to such late generations strongly supports the supposition made above about a transmittable destabilization by exo­ genous DNA of certain genes. Fahmy and Fahmy [6, 11] found mosaics among visible recessive mutations and Minutes induced by injection into adult D. melanogaster 8 ISSN 0233-7657. БИОПОЛИМЕРЫ И КЛЕТКА. 1994. Т. 10. № 2 males of DNA isolated from larvae of the same species and from rat liver. The data obtained in our previous work the induction of visible and lethal mutations in D. melanogaster by exogenous DNAs showed that these mutations in many important aspects closely resemble mutations in­ duced by spontaneous insertions into the chromosomes of the recipient of mobile genetic element of several kinds [12—15] and many other. It is most unlikely that this parallelism of the peculiarities of the mutagenic effects of spontaneous insertions of mobile genetic elements and of injec­ tions of exogenous DNA is accidental. It seems much more probable that fragments of molecules of exogenous DNA act like transpositions of mo­ bile genetic elements becoming inserted into chromosomes and selecti­ vely altering or destabilizing certain genes. If this hypothesis is correct it explains the prolonged mutagenic action of exogenous DNA. Fragments of this DNA for a time remain in a free state, like episomes, in the cells of the recipient and are thus transmitted from one cell generation to another; or they can be inserted into the DNA of chromosomes this cau­ sing gene mutations or inducing minor chromosome rearrangement this behaviour resembling that of some mobile genetic elements, e. g. copia (Flavell and Ish-Horowicz [16], Shiba and Saigo [17], Yamafumi et al. [18] and other authors). The reversions to wild-type observed by us of some unstable muta­ tions induced in Drosophila by exogenous DNA may be caused by an ex­ cision of the inserted fragment of foreign DNA or by a change of its ori­ entation within the chromosome. С. М. Гершензон, Ю. М. Александров ДЕЯК.1 HOBI ДАН1 СТОСОВНО МУТАГЕННОТ ДН ДНК Р е з ю м е Выявлено, що сперматозоТди самця Drosophila melanogaster здатш переносити до ооплазми заплцшюючого яйця молекули екзогенно!" ДНК (або i'xHi фрагменты) з роз- чину in'e'i ДНК, що введений до гемоцел1 самця; внаслщок цього шдуковаш ДНК му- тацп виникають у нащадюв у хромосомах, одержаних як в'щ батька, так i В1'д мате- pi. Показано, що мутагенна д1я екзогенно'1 ДНК мае пролонгований характер i шду- куе у нащадшв мутацп протягом ряду юптинних поколшь. Обговорюеться в1роп'дний мехашзм тако!' пролонговано!' да. REFERENCES 1. Гершензон С. М., Александров Ю. П., Малюта С. С. Мутагенное действие ДНК и̂ вирусов у дрозофилы.— Киев : Наук, думка, 1975.— 160 с. 2. Gevshenson S. М. Mutagenic action of DNA, insertion, transposition and gene insta­ bility//Proc. XIV Int. Congr. of Genet.—Moscow: Mir, 1980.—V. 1, book 2.— P. 91—115. 3. Brackett G. В., Baranska W., Sawickl W., Koprowski H. Uptake of heterologous genome by mammalian spermatozoa and its transfer to ova through fertilization // Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA.—1971.—68.—P. 353—357. 4. Lavitrano M. L., Camachi A., Fazio V. et al. Sperm cells as vectors for introducing foreign DNA into eggs: Genetic transformation in mice//Cell.— 1989.— 57.— P. 117—723. 5. Siracuso G., Camaioni A., Russ M. A. et al. Sperm as carrier of foreign DNA// Abs.tr. 12 Int. Meet. ESHRE and ESCO.—1990.—Suppl.—34 p. 6. Fahmy 0. G., Fahmy M. J. Genetic properties of exogenous deoxyribonucleic acid at various levels of degradation in Drosophila melanogaster //Nature.—1965.—207, N 4996.—P. 507—510. 7. Гершензон С. M., Зильберман Р. А., Левочкина О. А. и др. Вызывание мутаций у Drosophila melanogaster тдмонуклеиновой кислотой / / Журн. 0|бщ. биологии.— 1948.—9, № 2.—С. 69—88. 8. Gershenson S. Delayed mutagenic effect of DNA in Drosophila//Mechanism of muta­ tion and inducing factors.— Praha : Academia, 1965.— P. 291—293. 9. Mathew С The production of recessive lethals by calf-thymus DNA in Drosophila// Genetic Res.—1965.—6, N 2.—P. 163—174. 10. Khan A. H., Alderson T. Mutagenic effect of irradiated and unirradiated DNA in Drosophila//Nature.—1965.—208, N 5011.—P. 700—702. ISSN 0233-7657. БИОПОЛИМЕРЫ И КЛЕТКА. 1994. Т. 10. № 2 9 http://Abs.tr 11. Fahmy О. G., Fahmy M. J. Induction of mutations by deoxyribonucleic acid in Dro- sophila melanogaster//Ibid.— 1961.— 191, 4790.—P. 776—779. 12. Герасимова Т. И. Транспозиции мобильных генетических элементов и их роль в инсерционном мутагенезе у дрозофилы // Стабильность и изменчивость генома.— М. : Наука, 1985.—С. 26—38. 13. Green M. M. Mobile DNA element and spontaneous gene mutations//Eukaryotic transposable elements as mutagenic agents.— New York : Cold. Spring Harbor Lab., 1988.—P. 41—50. 14. Rubin G. M. Dispersed repetitive DNA in Drosophila//Mobile Genetic Elements.— New York: Acad, press, 1983.—P. 329—361. 15. Terracol R. Transcription of rDNA insertions in bobbed mutants of Drosophila me­ lanogaster J/ Genet. Res.—1986.—48, N 3.—P. 167—174. 16. Flavell A. J., Ish-Horowicz D. The origin of extrachromosomal circular elements// Cell.— 1986.—34.—P. 415—427. 17. Shibo Т., Saigo V. Retrovirus-like particles containing RNA-homologous to transpo­ sable elements copia in Drosophila melanogaster 11 Nature.— 1983.— 302.— P. 119—124. 18. Yamafumi E., Shiba T. et al. The nucleotide sequence in сорш-related DNA in Dro­ sophila virus particles//Ibid.—1985.—316.—P. 771—776. Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, 20.10.93 Academy of Sciences of the Ukraine, Kiev 10 ISSN 0233-7657. БИОПОЛИМЕРЫ И КЛЕТКА. 1994. Т. 10. № 2