Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries

Classification of the groups of local isometries of the rooted tree boundaries is established for transitive groups.

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2007
Автор: Lavrenyuk, Y.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України 2007
Назва видання:Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/157361
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries / Y. Lavrenyuk // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2007. — Vol. 6, № 2. — С. 104–110. — Бібліогр.: 6 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-157361
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1573612019-06-21T01:30:25Z Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries Lavrenyuk, Y. Classification of the groups of local isometries of the rooted tree boundaries is established for transitive groups. 2007 Article Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries / Y. Lavrenyuk // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2007. — Vol. 6, № 2. — С. 104–110. — Бібліогр.: 6 назв. — англ. 1726-3255 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C05, 20E08, 20F28. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/157361 en Algebra and Discrete Mathematics Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description Classification of the groups of local isometries of the rooted tree boundaries is established for transitive groups.
format Article
author Lavrenyuk, Y.
spellingShingle Lavrenyuk, Y.
Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries
Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
author_facet Lavrenyuk, Y.
author_sort Lavrenyuk, Y.
title Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries
title_short Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries
title_full Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries
title_fullStr Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries
title_full_unstemmed Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries
title_sort classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries
publisher Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
publishDate 2007
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/157361
citation_txt Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries / Y. Lavrenyuk // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2007. — Vol. 6, № 2. — С. 104–110. — Бібліогр.: 6 назв. — англ.
series Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
work_keys_str_mv AT lavrenyuky classificationofthelocalisometrygroupsofrootedtreeboundaries
first_indexed 2025-07-14T09:48:13Z
last_indexed 2025-07-14T09:48:13Z
_version_ 1837615278040547328
fulltext Jo u rn al A lg eb ra D is cr et e M at h . Algebra and Discrete Mathematics RESEARCH ARTICLE Number 2. (2007). pp. 104 – 110 c© Journal “Algebra and Discrete Mathematics” Classification of the local isometry groups of rooted tree boundaries Yaroslav Lavrenyuk Dedicated to V.I. Sushchansky on the occasion of his 60th birthday Abstract. Classification of the groups of local isometries of the rooted tree boundaries is established for transitive groups. 1. The notion of local isometry is defined naturally on a metric space. A bijection is a local isometry if it acts as an isometry in a neighborhood of each point. More precisely, let (X1, d1) and (X2, d2) be metric spaces. A bijection α : X1 → X2 is called a local isometry if for every x ∈ X1 there exists a neighborhood Ux of x such that for every x1, x2 ∈ Ux we have d2(x α 1 , xα 2 ) = d1(x1, x2). It is clear that the set of local isometries of a metric space (X, d) is a group. The group of the local isometries of the boundary of a rooted tree is investigated in [LS], [Lav], [MI]. In particular, in [Lav] it was proved that if the group of the local isometries of the boundary of a locally finite rooted tree is transitive, then it is complete, i.e., all its automorphisms are inner and its center is trivial. It is known that the full isometry groups of the boundary of a locally finite spherically homogeneous rooted tree are isomorphic if and only if the trees are isometric [Nek, Proposition 2.10.7]. The main result of this work is the analogous assertion for the local isometries. 2. We start with necessary definitions on rooted trees and groups acting on such trees. Let T be a locally finite rooted tree with the root vertex 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 05C05, 20E08, 20F28. Key words and phrases: rooted trees, ultrametrics, local isometry, classifica- tion. Jo u rn al A lg eb ra D is cr et e M at h .Y. Lavrenyuk 105 v0. For every two vertices u, v of the tree T (u, v ∈ V (T )) we define the distance between u and v, written d(u, v), to be the length of the shortest path connecting them. For an integer n ≥ 0 we define the nth level (the sphere of the radius n) to be the set Vn(T ) = {v ∈ V (T ) : d(v0, v) = n} . If the degree of a vertex v ∈ Vn(T ) depends only on n, then the tree T is called spherically homogeneous. Spherical index of a spherically homogeneous tree T is the sequence Ω = (a0, a1, . . .), where a0 is degree of the root and an + 1 is degree of any vertex of n-th level. Let T be a spherically homogeneous rooted tree with the root v0 and spherical index Ω. All such trees are isomorphic to the tree TΩ with the set of vertices equal to the set of all finite sequences (i0, i1, . . . , in−1), where ik ∈ {1, 2, . . . , ak} and n ≥ 0 is an integer. We also include the empty sequence (corresponding to n = 0). Two vertices are adjacent if and only if they are of the form (i0, . . . , in−1), (i0, . . . , in−1, in). An end of a rooted tree is an infinite path starting in the rooted vertex and having no repetitions. We will denote by ∂T (boundary) the set of all ends of T . Let λ̄ = {λn} ∞ n=0 be a strictly decreasing sequence of positive numbers tending to zero. We can introduce a natural ultrametric on ∂T by putting ρ(x1, x2) = λn, where n is the length of the maximal common part of the paths x1 and x2. The topology induced by the metrics ρ (or for convenience λ̄) is compact, totally disconnected and has a base of open sets (balls or cylinder sets) of the form Uv = {x ∈ ∂T | v ∈ x}, v ∈ V (T ). This compact ultrametric space will be denoted by (∂T, λ̄) or simply by ∂T . 3. In this work we study the classification problem of the full local isometry groups of the boundaries of rooted trees. We prove the following theorem. Theorem 1. Let T1 and T2 be locally finite rooted trees such that the groups of the local isometries act on their boundaries transitively. The full local isometries groups of (∂T1, µ̄1) and (∂T2, µ̄2) are isomorphic if and only if (∂T1, λ̄1) and (∂T2, λ̄2) are locally isometric for some metrics λ̄1 and λ̄2. In other words there are positive integers i and j, such that for every natural s the equality |Vi+s(T1)| = |Vj+s(T2)| holds. In the work [Lav] a sufficient condition for isomorphism for the local isometry groups was established Jo u rn al A lg eb ra D is cr et e M at h .106 Classification of isometry groups Proposition 2 ([Lav]). If there exist ultrametrics µ̄1 and µ̄2 such that the spaces (∂T1, µ̄1) and (∂T2, µ̄2) are locally isometric then their full local isometry groups are isomorphic. In that work it was also established that the boundary of a rooted tree on which the local isometries act transitively is locally isometric to the boundary of some spherically homogeneous tree. Proposition 3 ([Lav]). If the group LIsom(∂T, λ̄) acts transitively on ∂T then there is a spherically homogeneous tree TΩ and a sequence λ̄Ω such that (∂T, λ̄) and (∂TΩ, λ̄Ω) are locally isometric. Due to Propositions 2 and 3, in order to prove Theorem 1, we only need to show that if the groups of local isometries of the boundaries ∂T1 and ∂T2 of a spherically homogeneous tree are isomorphic then (∂T1, λ̄1) and (∂T2, λ̄2) are locally isometric for some metrics λ̄1 and λ̄2. 4. Let us fix some notations. Let Ti (i = 1, 2) be spherically homogeneous trees with spherical indices containing no ones. We will denote ∂Ti by Xi. We assume that the full local isometry groups of X1 and X2 are isomor- phic and φ : LIsom X1 → LIsom X2 is an isomorphism. By Rubin’s the- orem [Rub, Corollary 3.13c] there exists a homeomorphism h : X1 → X2 such that for every g ∈ LIsom X1 the equality φ(g) = hgh−1 holds. The action of LIsom Xi on Xi is ergodic with respect to the Bernoulli measure. Actually the only probabilistic measure on Xi with respect to which the action of LIsom Xi is ergodic is the Bernoulli measure (see [GNS]). Thus, we can fix the unique probabilistic LIsom Xi-invariant measures mi on sigma-algebras of Borel subsets of Xi. Lemma 4. For the homeomorphism h and the ball U1 v (v ∈ V (T1)) there are positive integers l and k such that h(U1 v ) = k ⋃ i=1 U2 vi , where {v1, . . . , vk} ⊂ Vl(T2). Proof. Since U1 v is compact and balls in X2 do not intersect or one con- tains the other, we have what is required. Lemma 5. For every ball U1 v (v ∈ Vk(T1)) (k ∈ N) the equality m2(h(U1 v )) = m1(U 1 v ), holds. Jo u rn al A lg eb ra D is cr et e M at h .Y. Lavrenyuk 107 Proof. The measures m1, m2 are probabilistic, i.e. m1(X1) = m2(X2) = 1. Since m1 is an LIsom X1-invariant measure, m1(X1) = m1   ⊔ w∈Vk(T1) U1 w   = |Vk(T1)|m1(U 1 v ). Since every local isometry preserves the measure, and φ(g) = hgh−1 for all g ∈ LIsom X1 we have m2(h(U1 u)) = m2(h(U1 w)) for any u, w ∈ Vk(T1). Therefore m2(X2) = m2(h(X1)) = m2  h   ⊔ w∈Vk(T1) U1 w     = = m2   ⊔ w∈Vk(T1) h(U1 w)   = |Vk(T1)|m2(h(U1 v )). Thus, m2(h(U1 v )) = m1(U 1 v ). Lemma 6. Let w ∈ Vm(T2) and v ∈ Vl(T1) be such that h−1(U2 w) = U1 v . Then |Vm(T2)| = |Vl(T1)|. Proof. By Lemma 5 we have m2(U 2 w) = m1(U 1 v ). Therefore |Vm(T2)|m2(U 2 w) = m1(U 1 v )|Vl(T1)| = 1. Thus we have |Vm(T2)| = |Vl(T1)|. Let (X, d) be a metric space. A bijection α : X1 → X2 is called a uniform local isometry if there exists δ > 0 such that d2(x α 1 , xα 2 ) = d1(x1, x2) for all x1, x2 ∈ X1 such that d1(x1, x2) < δ. It is easy to see that for a compact spaces every local isometry is a uniform local isometry. Lemma 7. There exist ultrametrics µ̄1 and µ̄2 such that the spaces (∂T1, µ̄1) and (∂T2, µ̄2) are locally isometric if and only if there exist i and j, such that for every positive integer s the equality |Vi+s(T1)| = |Vj+s(T2)| holds. Jo u rn al A lg eb ra D is cr et e M at h .108 Classification of isometry groups Proof. Obviously, if the equality holds then the spaces (∂T1, µ̄1) and (∂T2, µ̄2) are locally isometric for some ultrametrics µ̄1 and µ̄2. The remaining implication follows from uniformity of local isometry. Lemma 8. The spaces X1 and X2 are locally isometric for some ultra- metrics. Proof. Let {vi, i ∈ N} ⊂ V (T2) be infinite sequence of vertices such that vi � vj for all i 6= j. Let h−1(U2 vi ) = ⊔ki j=1 U1 uij , where {ui1, . . . , uiki } ⊂ Vli(T1). We also consider infinite sequence of vertices {wi, i ∈ N} ⊂ V (T2) such that wi ≺ vi and m2(U 2 wi ) < m1(U 1 uij ) for all i and j. We can assume that m2(U 2 wi ) > m2(U 2 wi+1 ), that is wi closer to the root than wi+1. We suppose that h−1(U2 wi ) is not a ball for all i. We will show that there exists a sequence {gi, i ∈ N} ⊂ Isom X1 such that 1. gi acts trivially on X1 \ h−1(U2 vi ). 2. φ(gi)(U 2 wi ) = hgih −1(U2 wi ) is not a ball. There exist only two possibilities for h−1(U2 wi ): 1. There exist j1 and j2 (1 ≤ j1, j2 ≤ ki) such that h−1(U2 wi )∩U1 uijs 6= ∅ (s = 1, 2). 2. There exists j (1 ≤ j ≤ ki) such that h−1(U2 wi ) $ U1 uij . In the first case we choose gi as follows: gi acts trivially on X1 \h−1(U2 vi ) and on U1 uij1 and move some points of U1 uij2 in such a way that gi(U 1 uij2 ) = U1 uij2 and gi(h −1(U2 wi )∩U1 uij2 ) 6= h−1(U2 wi )∩U1 uij2 . Since h−1(U2 wi )∩U1 uij2 is strictly contained in U1 uij2 , we have that there exists gi with the required properties. In the second case we choose gi as follows: gi acts trivially on X1 \ h−1(U2 vi ) and stabilizes U1 uij and gi(h −1(U2 wi )) 6= h−1(U2 wi ). Since h−1(U2 wi ) is strictly contained in U1 uij , we have that there exists gi with required properties. Since h−1(U2 vi ) ∩ h−1(U2 vj ) = ∅ for i 6= j we have that the infinite product g1g2g3 . . . defines an isometry g of the metric space X1. Thus φ(g) is a local isometry of X2. Therefore images of the balls with “small” radii are balls for the mapping φ(g). That is, there is a positive integer r, such that for every t > r and every vertex v ∈ Vt(T2) there exists w ∈ V (T2) such that φ(g)(U2 v ) = U2 w. (0.1) Jo u rn al A lg eb ra D is cr et e M at h .Y. Lavrenyuk 109 By the construction, φ(gi)(U 2 wi ) is not a ball for any positive integer i. Hence φ(g)(U2 wr+1 ) is not a ball either. Since wr+1 is in the level with number greater than r, we get a contradiction with (0.1). Thus our assumption is not true. So for any n > r the image h−1(U2 wn ) is a ball. Let m be such that wn is in Vm(T2). By Lemma 6 we have that |Vm(T2)| = |Vl(T1)| for some positive integer l. Suppose that there exists an infinite increasing sequence of positive integers {li, i ∈ N} such that for every i and m the inequality |Vli(T2)| 6= |Vm(T1)| holds. We can consider a sequence {uj , j ∈ N} ⊂ V (T2) such that for every positive integer j the conditions uj ≺ wj and uj ∈ Vk(T2) hold for k ∈ {li, i ∈ N}. Since m2(U 1 ui ) < m2(U 2 wi ) < m1(U 1 ui1 ) for all i, by the supposition and by Lemma 5, we have that h(U1 ui ) is not a ball. Therefore we have a contradiction with what we proved above. Thus for every m greater than some n the equality |Vm(T2)| = |Vl(T1)| holds for some positive integer l. Since h is a homeomorphism and φ is an isomorphism the converse statement is true: for every l greater than some k the equality |Vl(T1)| = |Vm(T2)| holds for some positive integer m. Therefore there exist i0 and j0 such that for every natural s the following equality holds: |Vi0+s(T1)| = |Vj0+s(T2)|. So the spaces X1 and X2 are locally isometric for some metrics. Now the proof of Theorem 1 follows from Lemmas 7, 8 and Proposi- tions 2 and 3. Corollary 9. If the ultrametrics on X1 and X2 are such that these spaces are locally isometric, then the homeomorphism h is a local isometry. Proof. Let f : X1 → X2 be a local isometry. Then hf−1 induces an automorphism of G1. Since G1 is a complete group we have that hf−1 is a local isometry. So h is also a local isometry. References [GNS] R. Grigorchuk, V. Nekrashevich, V. Sushchansky, Automata, dynamical sys- tems, and groups. (Russian) Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklova 231 (2000), Din. Sist., Avtom. i Beskon. Gruppy, 134–214; translation in Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 2000, no. 4 (231), 128–203 [Lav] Lavrenyuk Ya. On automorphisms of local isometry groups of compact ultra- metric spaces. International Journal of Algebra and Computation, 15(5-6) 2005, 1013–1024. [LS] Ya.V.Lavrenyuk, V.I.Sushchansky Automorphisms of homogeneous symmetric groups and hierarchomorphisms of rooted trees, Algebra and Discrete Mathemat- ics, N. 4 (2003), 33–49. Jo u rn al A lg eb ra D is cr et e M at h .110 Classification of isometry groups [MI] B.Majcher-Iwanow Equivalence relations induced by some locally compact groups of homeomorphisms of 2 N. Colloq. Math. 103 (2005), no. 2, 287–301. [Nek] V.Nekrashevych Self-similar groups. AMS: Mathematical Surveys and Mono- graphs, Vol.117, 231 pp., 2005. [Rub] Rubin M. On the reconstruction of topological spaces from their groups of home- omorphisms. Transactions of the AMS, Vol. 312, No 2. April 1989, 487–538. Contact information Y. Lavrenyuk Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University, Volody- myrska st. 64, 01033, Kyiv, Ukraine E-Mail: ylavrenyuk@univ.kiev.ua