Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband

We determine all isomorphisms between the endomorphism semigroups of free abelian dibands and prove that all automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband are inner.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2018
1. Verfasser: Zhuchok, Y.V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України 2018
Schriftenreihe:Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
Online Zugang:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/188367
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband / Y.V. Zhuchok // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2018. — Vol. 25, № 2. — С. 322–332. — Бібліогр.: 19 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-188367
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-1883672023-02-26T01:26:55Z Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband Zhuchok, Y.V. We determine all isomorphisms between the endomorphism semigroups of free abelian dibands and prove that all automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband are inner. 2018 Article Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband / Y.V. Zhuchok // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2018. — Vol. 25, № 2. — С. 322–332. — Бібліогр.: 19 назв. — англ. 1726-3255 2010 MSC: 08B20, 17A30, 08A30, 08A35. http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/188367 en Algebra and Discrete Mathematics Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description We determine all isomorphisms between the endomorphism semigroups of free abelian dibands and prove that all automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband are inner.
format Article
author Zhuchok, Y.V.
spellingShingle Zhuchok, Y.V.
Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband
Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
author_facet Zhuchok, Y.V.
author_sort Zhuchok, Y.V.
title Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband
title_short Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband
title_full Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband
title_fullStr Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband
title_full_unstemmed Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband
title_sort automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband
publisher Інститут прикладної математики і механіки НАН України
publishDate 2018
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/188367
citation_txt Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband / Y.V. Zhuchok // Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. — 2018. — Vol. 25, № 2. — С. 322–332. — Бібліогр.: 19 назв. — англ.
series Algebra and Discrete Mathematics
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuchokyv automorphismsoftheendomorphismsemigroupofafreeabeliandiband
first_indexed 2025-07-16T10:23:43Z
last_indexed 2025-07-16T10:23:43Z
_version_ 1837798704966270976
fulltext “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 322 — #160 Algebra and Discrete Mathematics RESEARCH ARTICLE Volume 25 (2018). Number 2, pp. 322–332 c© Journal “Algebra and Discrete Mathematics” Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband∗ Yurii V. Zhuchok Communicated by V. A. Artamonov Abstract. We determine all isomorphisms between the endomorphism semigroups of free abelian dibands and prove that all automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband are inner. 1. Introduction The problem of the description of automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup for free algebras in a certain variety was raised by B. I. Plotkin in his papers on universal algebraic geometry (see, e.g., [1], [2]). At the present time there are many papers devoted to describing automorphisms of endomorphism semigroups of free finitely generated universal algebras of different varieties: groups, (inverse) semigroups and monoids [3–5], modules and semimodules [6], Lie algebras and associative algebras [7], [8], dimonoids and g-dimonoids [9], [10] and some others [11], [12]. As it is well-known, the notion of a dimonoid, and constructions of a free associative dialgebra and a free dimonoid were defined by J.-L. Loday [13]. Later on, free dimonoids and free commutative dimonoids were investigated in detail in [14] and [15], respectively. Free abelian dimonoids (this class does not coincide with the class of commutative dimonoids) were ∗The publication is based on the research provided by the grant support of the State Fund For Fundamental Research (project F83/43909). 2010 MSC: 08B20, 17A30, 08A30, 08A35. Key words and phrases: dimonoid, free abelian diband, endomorphism semi- group, automorphism. “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 323 — #161 Yu. V. Zhuchok 323 described in [16]. The structure of free normal dibands, free (lr, rr)-dibands and free (ln, rn)-dibands was considered in [17], [18]. For the variety of abelian idempotent dimonoids it was shown [19] that it coincides with the variety of (ln, rn)-dibands. In this paper, we consider the mentioned above problem of the description of automorphisms of endomorphism semigroups for free algebras in the variety of abelian dibands. The paper is organized as follows. In Sections 2 and 3, we give necessary definitions and prove auxiliary statements, respectively. In Section 4, we describe stable automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband. In Section 5, we establish that all automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free abelian diband are inner and show that the automorphism group of such endomorphism semigroup is isomorphic to the symmetric group. 2. Preliminaries Recall that a nonempty set D with two binary associative operations ⊣ and ⊢ is called a dimonoid if for all x, y, z ∈ D, (D1) (x ⊣ y) ⊣ z = x ⊣ (y ⊢ z), (D2) (x ⊢ y) ⊣ z = x ⊢ (y ⊣ z), (D3) (x ⊣ y) ⊢ z = x ⊢ (y ⊢ z). A dimonoid (D,⊣,⊢) is called abelian [16] if for all x, y ∈ D, x ⊣ y = y ⊢ x. A band is a semigroup whose elements are idempotents. If for a dimonoid (D,⊣,⊢) the semigroups (D,⊣) and (D,⊢) are bands, then this dimonoid is called idempotent (or simply a diband). For example, any non-singleton left zero and right zero dimonoid (D,⊣,⊢), that is, (D,⊣) is a left zero semigroup and (D,⊢) is a right zero semigroup, is an abelian diband. More examples of abelian dibands can be found, e.g., in [18], [19]. An idempotent semigroup S is called a left regular band if aba = ab for all a, b ∈ S. If instead of the last identity, aba = ba holds, then S is a right regular band. A dimonoid (D,⊣,⊢) is called a (lr, rr)-diband [18] if (D,⊣) is a left regular band and (D,⊢) is a right regular band. Let X be a nonempty set and FS(X) the free semilattice of all nonempty finite subsets of X with respect to the operation of the set “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 324 — #162 324 Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup theoretical union. Define two binary operations ⊣ and ⊢ on the set Blz,rz(X) = {(a,A) ∈ X × FS(X)|a ∈ A} as follows: (x,A) ⊣ (y,B) = (x,A ∪B) and (x,A) ⊢ (y,B) = (y,A ∪B). Proposition 1. [18] The algebraic system (Blz,rz(X),⊣,⊢) is the free (lr, rr)-diband. A semigroup S is called left commutative (respectively, right commu- tative) if it satisfies the identity xya = yxa (respectively, axy = ayx). An idempotent semigroup S is called a left (respectively, right) normal band if it is right (respectively, left) commutative. A dimonoid (D,⊣,⊢) is called a (ln, rn)-diband [18] if (D,⊣) is a left normal band and (D,⊢) is a right normal band. Theorem 1. [19] A dimonoid (D,⊣,⊢) is abelian idempotent if and only if (D,⊣,⊢) is a (ln, rn)-diband. From Theorem 1 we immediately obtain that the variety of abelian dibands coincides with the variety of (ln, rn)-dibands. It is well-known also [18] that the variety of (ln, rn)-dibands and the variety of (lr, rr)-dibands coincide. So, (Blz,rz(X),⊣,⊢) is the free abelian diband. Further, we will denote (Blz,rz(X),⊣,⊢) simply by Blz,rz(X). We note that the cardinality of X is the rank of the diband Blz,rz(X) and this diband is uniquely determined up to an isomorphism by |X|. Obviously, operations of the free abelian diband Blz,rz(X) coincide if and only if |X| = 1. In this case Blz,rz(X) is singleton. For every (u1, U) ∈ Blz,rz(X), where U = {u1, u2, . . . , un}, we have (u1, U) = (u1, {u1}) ⊣ (u2, {u2}) ⊣ · · · ⊣ (un, {un}). This representation we call a canonical form of elements of the diband Blz,rz(X). It is clear that such representation is unique for n ∈ {1, 2} and it is unique up to an order of (ui, {ui}), 2 6 i 6 n, for n > 3. Moreover, 〈{(x, {x})|x ∈ X}〉 = Blz,rz(X), that is, X ′ = {(x, {x})|x ∈ X} is a generating set of Blz,rz(X). “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 325 — #163 Yu. V. Zhuchok 325 3. Auxiliary statements We begin this section with the following lemma. Lemma 1. Let Blz,rz(X) and Blz,rz(Y ) be free abelian dibands defined on X and Y , respectively. Every bijection ϕ : X → Y induces an isomorphism εϕ : Blz,rz(X) → Blz,rz(Y ) such that (u, U)εϕ = (uϕ,Uϕ) for all (u, U) ∈ Blz,rz(X). Proof. The proof is obvious. Let Blz,rz(X) be the free abelian diband. Every endomorphism ξ of Blz,rz(X) is uniquely determined by a mapping ξ′ : X ′ → Blz,rz(X). Indeed, to determine ξ, it suffices to set (u1, U)ξ = (u1, {u1})ξ ′ ⊣ (u2, {u2})ξ ′ ⊣ · · · ⊣ (un, {un})ξ ′ for all (u1, U) ∈ Blz,rz(X), U = {u1, u2, . . . , un}. In particular, the endomorphism ξ of Blz,rz(X) is an automorphism if and only if a restriction ξ on X ′ belongs to the symmetric group S(X ′). Therefore, the group Aut(Blz,rz(X)) is isomorphic to S(X). Let F (X) be a free algebra in a variety V with a generating set X and u ∈ F (X). An endomorphism θu ∈ End(F (X)) is called constant if xθu = u for all x ∈ X. We denote by N the set of all positive integers. For every nonempty subset G of Blz,rz(X) and i ∈ N we put ΘG = {θ(a,A)|(a,A) ∈ G} and UX i = {(a,A) ∈ Blz,rz(X) : |A| = i}. Lemma 2. Let Ψ : End(Blz,rz(X)) → End(Blz,rz(Y )) be an isomorphism. For every i ∈ N there exists j ∈ N such that ΘUX i Ψ = ΘUY j . Proof. For |X| = 1 the statement is trivial. Let |X| > 2 and θ(a,A) ∈ End(Blz,rz(X)), where (a,A) ∈ UX i . It is not hard to see that all elements θ(u,U), (u, U) ∈ Blz,rz(X), and only they have the property that ξθ(u,U) = θ(u,U) for all ξ ∈ End(Blz,rz(X)). Therefore, θBlz,rz(X)Ψ = θBlz,rz(Y ), so that θ(a,A)Ψ = θ(b,B) for some (b, B) ∈ Blz,rz(Y ). “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 326 — #164 326 Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup Take arbitrary (a′, A′) ∈ UX i , (a ′, A′) 6= (a,A), and an automorphism ϕ : Blz,rz(X) → Blz,rz(X) such that (a,A)ϕ = (a′, A′). It is clear that there exists a such automorphism, since |A| = |A′|. Then θ(a′,A′)Ψ = θ(a,A)ϕΨ = (θ(a,A)ϕ)Ψ = (θ(a,A)Ψ)(ϕΨ) = θ(b,B)(ϕΨ) = θ(b,B)(ϕΨ). Since ϕΨ is an automorphism of Blz,rz(Y ), then putting (b, B)(ϕΨ) = (b′, B′) we obtain |B| = |B′|. Hence (b′, B′) ∈ UY j , where j = |B|. It means that ΘUX i Ψ ⊆ ΘUY j . Since Ψ−1 is an isomorphism and obviously |Y | > 2, we can analogously obtain the inclusion ΘUY j Ψ−1 ⊆ ΘUX i , consequently ΘUX i Ψ = ΘUY j . The following statement shows that any isomorphism of the endomor- phism monoids of free abelian dibands induces a uniquely determined bijection between the generating sets of these dibands. Lemma 3. Every isomorphism Ψ : End(Blz,rz(X)) → End(Blz,rz(Y )) implies that ΘUX 1 Ψ = ΘUY 1 . Proof. Let Ψ be an arbitrary isomorphism of monoids End(Blz,rz(X)) and End(Blz,rz(Y )), and |X| > 2 (the case |X| = 1 is trivial). By Lemma 2, ΘUX 1 Ψ = ΘUY α for some α ∈ N. Assume that α 6= 1, then there exist some (a′, C) and (b′, C) of UY α with distinct a′ and b′. Using Lemma 2, there exists β ∈ N such that ΘUX β Ψ = ΘUY 1 . It is easy to see that β 6= 1. Let (s, S) and (t, T ) be two distinct pairs from UX β . Then θ(a,{a})Ψ = θ(a′,C), θ(b,{b})Ψ = θ(b′,C), θ(s,S)Ψ = θ(x,{x}) and θ(t,T )Ψ = θ(y,{y}) for some a, b ∈ X and x, y ∈ Y . Evidently, a 6= b and x 6= y. Now we take an arbitrary mapping η′ : UX 1 → UX β such that (a, {a})η′ = (s, S) and (b, {b})η′ = (t, T ). This mapping is uniquely extended (see reasoning after Lemma 1) to an endomorphism of Blz,rz(X) that we will denote by η. Thus, θ(x,{x}) = θ(s,S)Ψ = (θ(a,{a})η)Ψ = (θ(a,{a})Ψ)(ηΨ) = θ(a′,C)(ηΨ) = θ(a′,C)(ηΨ). “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 327 — #165 Yu. V. Zhuchok 327 Analogously, we can obtain θ(y,{y}) = θ(b′,C)(ηΨ). From here it follows that (a′, C)(ηΨ) = (x, {x}) and (b′, C)(ηΨ) = (y, {y}). Further, we have ((a′, C) ⊣ (b′, C))(ηΨ) = (a′, C)(ηΨ) = (x, {x}) and (a′, C)(ηΨ) ⊣ (b′, C)(ηΨ) = (x, {x}) ⊣ (y, {y}) = (x, {x, y}), that contradicts the fact that ηΨ is an endomorphism of Blz,rz(Y ). Hence α = 1, that is, ΘUX 1 Ψ = ΘUY 1 . Let Ψ : End(Blz,rz(X)) → End(Blz,rz(Y )) be an arbitrary isomor- phism,X ′ and Y ′ generating sets ofBlz,rz(X) and ofBlz,rz(Y ), respectively. By Lemma 3, for every x = (x, {x}) ∈ X ′ there exists y = (y, {y}) ∈ Y ′ such that θxΨ = θy. Define a bijection ψ : X → Y putting xψ = y if θxΨ = θy. In this case we say that ψ is induced by the isomorphism Ψ. 4. Stable automorphisms of End(Blz,rz(X)) Let F (X) be a free algebra in a variety V over a set X. An automor- phism Ψ of the endomorphism monoid End(F (X)) is called stable if Ψ induces the identity permutation of X, that is, θxΨ = θx for all x ∈ X. An endomorphism θ of the free algebra F (X) is called linear if xθ ∈ X for all x ∈ X. Throughout this section, X denotes an arbitrary set with |X| > 2. Lemma 4. Let Ψ be a stable automorphism of End(Blz,rz(X)), (a,A), (b, B) ∈ Blz,rz(X) and ξ ∈ End(Blz,rz(X)). Then (i) ξΨ = ξ, if ξ is linear; (ii) A = B, if θ(a,A)Ψ = θ(b,B). Proof. (i) Using the linearity of ξ and the stability of Ψ, we obtain θ(x,{x})(ξΨ) = θ(x,{x})(ξΨ) = (θ(x,{x})Ψ)(ξΨ) = (θ(x,{x})ξ)Ψ = θ(x,{x})ξΨ = θ(x,{x})ξ, x ∈ X. From here (x, {x})(ξΨ) = (x, {x})ξ for all x ∈ X. (ii) Suppose that A \ B 6= ∅ and take z ∈ A \ B, x ∈ X,x 6= z and ξ ∈ End(Blz,rz(X)) such that (z, {z})ξ = (x, {x}) and (y, {y})ξ = (y, {y}) “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 328 — #166 328 Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup for all y ∈ X, y 6= z. So ξ is linear, in addition, (b, B)ξ = (b, B). By (i) of this lemma, ξΨ = ξ and θ(a,A)Ψ = θ(b,B) = θ(b,B)ξ = θ(b,B)ξ = (θ(a,A)Ψ)(ξΨ) = (θ(a,A)ξ)Ψ = θ(a,A)ξΨ. Using the injectivity of Ψ, we have θ(a,A) = θ(a,A)ξ. From here (a,A) = (a,A)ξ which contradicts to the definition of ξ, so A \ B = ∅. In the similar way we can prove that B \A = ∅. Therefore, A = B. Corollary 1. Let Ψ be a stable automorphism of End(Blz,rz(X)) and a, b ∈ X, a 6= b. Then θ(a,{a,b})Ψ = θ(a,{a,b}) or θ(a,{a,b})Ψ = θ(b,{a,b}). Proof. From Lemma 2 it follows that θ(a,{a,b})Ψ = θ(u,U) for some (u, U) of Blz,rz(X). By (ii) of Lemma 4, U = {a, b}. Thus, (u, U) = (a, {a, b}) or (u, U) = (b, {a, b}). Corollary 2. Let Ψ be a stable automorphism of End(Blz,rz(X)). Then for all x ∈ X, θ(x,{x})ξΨ = θ(x,{x})(ξΨ). Proof. It follows from the proof of the condition (i) of Lemma 4. We denote by Φ0 the identity automorphism of End(Blz,rz(X)). Lemma 5. Let Ψ be a stable automorphism of End(Blz,rz(X)) and a, b ∈ X, a 6= b. If θ(a,{a,b})Ψ = θ(a,{a,b}), then Ψ = Φ0. Proof. Show firstly that θ(u,U)Ψ = θ(u,U) for all (u, U) ∈ Blz,rz(X) by induction on |U |. Since Ψ is stable, θ(u,{u})Ψ = θ(u,{u}) for all u ∈ X. Assume that θ(v,V )Ψ = θ(v,V ) for all (v, V ) ∈ Blz,rz(X) with |V | < n, and let (u, U) ∈ Blz,rz(X), where U = {u1, u2, . . . , un}, u = u1 and n > 2. We put v1 = (u, U \ {un}), v2 = (un, {un}) and take the endomorphism f of Blz,rz(X) such that (a, {a})f = v1, (b, {b})f = v2 and (y, {y})f = (y, {y}) for all y ∈ X \ {a, b}. Then for all x ∈ X, (x, {x})(θ(a,{a,b})f) = ((a, {a}) ⊣ (b, {b}))f = (a, {a})f ⊣ (b, {b})f = (u, U) = (x, {x})θ(u,U). Therefore, θ(a,{a,b})f = θ(u,U) for all (u, U) ∈ Blz,rz(X) with |U | > 2. Using the induction hypothesis and Corollary 2, we have θ(a,{a})(fΨ) = θ(a,{a})fΨ = θv1Ψ = θv1 = θ(a,{a})f , θ(b,{b})(fΨ) = θ(b,{b})fΨ = θv2Ψ = θv2 = θ(b,{b})f “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 329 — #167 Yu. V. Zhuchok 329 and θ(y,{y})(fΨ) = θ(y,{y})fΨ = θ(y,{y})Ψ = θ(y,{y}) = θ(y,{y})f , y ∈ X \ {a, b}. Thus, fΨ = f and for all (u, U) ∈ Blz,rz(X) with |U | > 2, θ(u,U)Ψ = (θ(a,{a,b})f)Ψ = (θ(a,{a,b})Ψ)(fΨ) = θ(a,{a,b})f = θ(u,U). So, θ(u,U)Ψ = θ(u,U) for all (u, U) ∈ Blz,rz(X). Moreover, for all x ∈ X and ϕ ∈ End(Blz,rz(X)) we obtain θ(x,{x})(ϕΨ) = θ(x,{x})ϕΨ = θ(x,{x})ϕ. This means that ϕΨ = ϕ for all ϕ ∈ End(Blz,rz(X)) and so Ψ = Φ0. Lemma 6. Let a, b ∈ X be distinct. There is no a stable automorphism Ψ of End(Blz,rz(X)) such that θ(a,{a,b})Ψ = θ(b,{a,b}). Proof. Assume that there exists a stable automorphism Ψ of the monoid End(Blz,rz(X)) such that θ(a,{a,b})Ψ = θ(b,{a,b}). Using the condition (ii) of Lemma 4, θ(b,{a,b})Ψ = θ(a,{a,b}). Let g ∈ End(Blz,rz(X)) such that (a, {a})g = (a, {a}), (b, {b})g = (a, {a, b}) and (x, {x})g = (x, {x}) for all x ∈ X \ {a, b}. It is easy to see that θ(a,{a})g = θ(a,{a}) and θ(b,{b})g = θ(a,{a,b}). Then θ(a,{a}) = θ(a,{a})Ψ = (θ(a,{a})g)Ψ = θ(a,{a})(gΨ) = θ(a,{a})(gΨ) and θ(b,{a,b}) = θ(a,{a,b})Ψ = (θ(b,{b})g)Ψ = θ(b,{b})(gΨ) = θ(b,{b})(gΨ). From here (a, {a})(gΨ) = (a, {a}) and (b, {b})(gΨ) = (b, {a, b}). Using the equality θ(b,{a,b})g = θ(a,{a,b}), on the one hand we obtain θ(b,{a,b}) = θ(a,{a,b})Ψ = (θ(b,{a,b})g)Ψ = θ(a,{a,b})(gΨ) = θ(a,{a,b})(gΨ), and so (a, {a, b})(gΨ) = (b, {a, b}). On the other hand, (a, {a, b})(gΨ) = ((a, {a}) ⊣ (b, {b}))(gΨ) = (a, {a}) ⊣ (b, {a, b}) = (a, {a, b}) that contradicts the previous expression for (a, {a, b})(gΨ). “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 330 — #168 330 Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup 5. The automorphism group of End(Blz,rz(X)) Firstly, we describe all isomorphisms between the endomorphism semi- groups of free abelian dibands. Recall that εϕ denotes the isomorphism Blz,rz(X) → Blz,rz(Y ) which is induced by the bijection ϕ : X → Y (see Lemma 1). Theorem 2. Every isomorphism Φ : End(Blz,rz(X)) → End(Blz,rz(Y )) is induced by the isomorphism εf of Blz,rz(X) to Blz,rz(Y ) for a uniquely determined bijection f : X → Y . Proof. The case |X| = 1 is trivial, so that we suppose further |X| > 1. Let Φ : End(Blz,rz(X)) → End(Blz,rz(Y )) be an arbitrary isomorphism. By Lemma 3, Φ induces a uniquely determined bijection f : X → Y such that θ(x,{x})Φ = θ(xf,{xf}) for every x ∈ X. By Lemma 1, f induces the isomorphism εf : Blz,rz(X) → Blz,rz(Y ). It is not hard to check that the mapping Ef : End(Blz,rz(X)) → End(Blz,rz(Y )) : η 7→ ε−1 f ηεf is an isomorphism. From here it follows that Ω = ΦE−1 f is an automor- phism of End(Blz,rz(X)). Since for all x ∈ X we have θ(x,{x})Ω = (θ(x,{x})Φ)E −1 f = θ(xf,{xf})E −1 f = θ(xff−1,{xff−1}) = θ(x,{x}), then Ω is stable. By Corollary 1, Lemma 5 and Lemma 6, Ω is an identity automor- phism Φ0. From ΦE−1 f = Φ0 we obtain Φ = Ef , i.e., Φ is an isomorphism induced by εf . Let F (X) be a free algebra in a variety V over a set X. An automor- phism Φ of End(F (X)) is called inner if there exists an automorphism α of F (X) such that βΦ = α−1βα for all β ∈ End(F (X)). Finally, we characterize the automorphism group of the endomorphism monoid of a free abelian diband. Theorem 3. All automorphisms of End(Blz,rz(X)) are inner. In addi- tion, the automorphism group Aut(End(Blz,rz(X))) is isomorphic to the symmetric group S(X). Proof. Let X = Y in Theorem 2, then it will be the first part of the given theorem. By Theorem 2, every automorphism Φ of End(Blz,rz(X)) has a form Φ = Ef , where ηΦ = ε−1 f ηεf for all η ∈ End(Blz,rz(X)) and a “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 331 — #169 Yu. V. Zhuchok 331 suitable bijection f : X → X. As follows from Lemma 1 (see Section 3), εf ∈ Aut(Blz,rz(X)) for all f ∈ S(X), therefore all automorphisms of End(Blz,rz(X)) are inner. Define a mapping ζ : Aut(End(Blz,rz(X))) → S(X) as follows: Efζ = f for all Ef ∈ Aut(End(Blz,rz(X))). An immediate check shows that ζ is an isomorphism. References [1] Plotkin B.I., Seven Lectures on the Universal Algebraic Geometry, Preprint, Institute of Mathematics, Hebrew University, 2000. [2] Plotkin B.I., Algebras with the same (algebraic) geometry, Proc. of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics 242 (2003), 176–207. [3] Formanek E., A question of B.Plotkin about the semigroup of endomorphisms of a free group, Proc. AMS 130 (2001), 935–937. [4] Mashevitzky G., Schein B.M., Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free monoid or a free semigroup, Proc. AMS 131 (2003), no. 6, 1655–1660. [5] Mashevitzky G., Schein B.M., Zhitomirski G.I., Automorphisms of the endomor- phism semigroup of a free inverse semigroup, Commun. Algebra 34 (2006), no. 10, 3569–3584. [6] Katsov Y., Lipyanski R., Plotkin B.I., Automorphisms of categories of free mo- dules, free semimodules, and free Lie modules, Commun. Algebra 35 (2007), no. 3, 931–952. [7] Mashevitzky G., Plotkin B., Plotkin E., Automorphisms of the category of free Lie algebras, J. Algebra 282 (2004), 490–512. [8] Kanel-Belov A., Berzins A., Lipyanski R., Automorphisms of the semigroup of endomorphisms of free associative algebras, arXiv:math/0512273v3 [math.RA], 2005. [9] Zhuchok Yu.V., Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free commu- tative dimonoid, Commun. Algebra 45 (2017), no. 9, 3861–3871. [10] Zhuchok Yu.V., Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a free commu- tative g-dimonoid, Algebra and Discrete Math. 21 (2016), no. 2, 295–310. [11] Atabekyan V.S., The automorphisms of endomorphism semigroups of free burnside groups, Intern. J. Algebra and Computation 25 (2015), no. 04, 669–674. [12] Belov-Kanel A., Lipyanski R., Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup of a polynomial algebra, J. Algebra 333 (2011), 40–54. [13] Loday J.-L., Dialgebras, in: Dialgebras and related operads, Lect. Notes Math. 1763, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001, 7–66. [14] Zhuchok A.V., Free dimonoids, Ukr. Math. J. 63 (2011), no. 2, 196–208. [15] Zhuchok A.V., Free commutative dimonoids, Algebra and Discrete Math. 9 (2010), no. 1, 109–119. [16] Zhuchok Yu.V., Free abelian dimonoids, Algebra and Discrete Math. 20 (2015), no. 2, 330–342. “adm-n2” — 2018/7/24 — 22:32 — page 332 — #170 332 Automorphisms of the endomorphism semigroup [17] Zhuchok A.V., Structure of relatively free dimonoids, Commun. Algebra 45 (2017), no. 4, 1639–1656. doi: 10.1080/00927872.2016.1222404. [18] Zhuchok A.V., Free (lr, rr)-dibands, Algebra and Discrete Math. 15 (2013), no. 2, 295–304. [19] Zhuchok Yu.V., Free abelian dibands, Visnyk of the Lviv Univ. Series Mech. Math. 84 (2017), 15–21 (in Ukrainian). Contact information Yurii V. Zhuchok Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Gogol square 1, Starobilsk, Ukraine, 92703 E-Mail(s): zhuchok.yu@gmail.com Received by the editors: 19.06.2018 and in final form 30.06.2018.