On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups

The formulated theorem specifies the result of A.V. Skorokhod concerning the stability with probability one for the solution of a linear stochastic system built on a continuous homogeneous semimartingale with independent increments.

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2005
Автор: Chani, A.C.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Інститут математики НАН України 2005
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/4425
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups / A.C. Chani // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2005. — Т. 11 (27), № 3-4. — С. 58–62. — Бібліогр.: 1 назв.— англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-4425
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-44252009-11-10T12:00:30Z On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups Chani, A.C. The formulated theorem specifies the result of A.V. Skorokhod concerning the stability with probability one for the solution of a linear stochastic system built on a continuous homogeneous semimartingale with independent increments. 2005 Article On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups / A.C. Chani // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2005. — Т. 11 (27), № 3-4. — С. 58–62. — Бібліогр.: 1 назв.— англ. 0321-3900 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/4425 519.21 en Інститут математики НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description The formulated theorem specifies the result of A.V. Skorokhod concerning the stability with probability one for the solution of a linear stochastic system built on a continuous homogeneous semimartingale with independent increments.
format Article
author Chani, A.C.
spellingShingle Chani, A.C.
On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups
author_facet Chani, A.C.
author_sort Chani, A.C.
title On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups
title_short On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups
title_full On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups
title_fullStr On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups
title_full_unstemmed On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups
title_sort on the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
publishDate 2005
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/4425
citation_txt On the stability with probability one for a class of stochastic semigroups / A.C. Chani // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2005. — Т. 11 (27), № 3-4. — С. 58–62. — Бібліогр.: 1 назв.— англ.
work_keys_str_mv AT chaniac onthestabilitywithprobabilityoneforaclassofstochasticsemigroups
first_indexed 2025-07-02T07:40:27Z
last_indexed 2025-07-02T07:40:27Z
_version_ 1836520075674255360
fulltext Theory of Stochastic Processes Vol. 11 (27), no. 3–4, 2005, pp. 58–62 UDC 519.21 A. C. CHANI ON THE STABILITY WITH PROBABILITY ONE FOR A CLASS OF STOCHASTIC SEMIGROUPS The formulated theorem specifies the result of A.V. Skorokhod concerning the sta- bility with probability one for the solution of a linear stochastic system built on a continuous homogeneous semimartingale with independent increments. We specify the result by A.V. Skorokhod published in monograph [1] concerning the conditions of the asymptotic stability with probability one of a homogeneous stochastic semigroup U0 t with values in the space L(Rd). The semigroup U0 t is given by the solution of the linear stochastic differential equation dU0 t = AU0 t dt + n∑ k=1 BkU0 t dwk(t), 0 ≤ t < ∞, (1) where A, B1, B2, ..., Bn ∈ L(Rd), w1(t), w2(t), ..., wn(t) are independent Wiener processes with values in R1, and the stability is understood as follows: for each x ∈ Rd, P ( lim t→∞U0 t x = 0 ) = 1. (2) The mentioned result ([1], p. 244, Theorem 18) means that it is sufficient for the stability of the semigroup U0 t for all x ∈ Rd lying on a unit sphere with the center at zero that the following inequality be fulfilled: D(x) = (Ax, x) + 1 2 n∑ k=1 |Bkx|2 − n∑ k=1 (Bkx, x)2 < 0, (3) where | · | is the norm in Rd generated by a scalar product (·, ·). In the particular case with B1 = B2 = ... = Bn = 0, hypothesis (3) appears as (Ax, x) < 0. In other words, for the stability of the nonrandom semigroup U0 t which is a solution of the equation dU0 t = AU0 t dt, (4) it is required that the matrix A∗ + A be negatively defined ((A∗ + A)x, x) < 0, |x| = 1, (5) where A∗ is the matrix symmetric to A. Condition (5) for systems of the form (4) is overstated because the classical result of Lyapunov only requires in this case that the matrix A be stable. This means that we can found a symmetric positive definite matrix H such that ((A∗H + HA)x, x) < 0, |x| = 1. 2000 AMS Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 60F15, 60H25. Key words and phrases. Stability, stochastic system. 58 ON THE STABILITY FOR A CLASS OF STOCHASTIC SEMIGROUPS 59 Thus, it is natural to deduce the conditions for system (1) to be stable, from which the result of Lyapunov will follow in the absence of stochastic additives. The present work is devoted to the solution of the above-mentioned problem. We now pass to exact statements. All processes are defined on a space (Ω,F ,Ft, P ), t ≥ 0, which satisfies the usual conditions. We consider the stochastic process Yt = At + n∑ k=1 Bkwk(t) receiving the values in the space (L(Rd),M), d ≥ 1, where L(Rd) is the set of real d× d- matrices alloted with a Borel σ-algebra M with respect to the Euclidean norm generated by a scalar product (A, B) = Sp(B∗A). We define Ut as a solution of the equation Ut = I + ∫ t 0 dYsUs, (6) where I is the identity matrix from L(Rd). By L+ s (Rd), we denote the set of symmetric positive definite matrices from L(Rd) and, with the help of V ∈ L+ s (Rd), apply it to the similarity transformation Ut(V ) = V UtV −1. Consider the matrix V as a parameter and define the family of processes ϑ = {Ut(V ); V ∈ L+ s (Rd)}. Let V be an arbitrary matrix from L+ s (Rd), and let λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ ... ≥ λd > 0 be its eigenvalues. Then the well-known inequalities λd|Uty| ≤ |Ut(V )x| ≤ λ1|Uty|, y = V −1x, x ∈ Rd, are valid. The mappings x → y = V −1x and y → x = V y are one-to-one mutually inverse. Therefore, the stability in the sense of definition (2) of the process Ut yields the stability of Ut(V ), and conversely. Thus, one can judge the stability of the ϑ family of processes by the stability of any of its representatives. On the other hand, each process Ut(V ) from ϑ is the solution of an equation of the form (6): Ut(V ) = I + ∫ t 0 dYs(V )Us(V ), where Yt(V ) = A(V )t + n∑ k=1 Bk(V )wk(t), A(V ) = V AV −1, Bk(V ) = V BkV −1, k = 1, 2, ..., n. Therefore, the result of A.V. Skorokhod is applicable to the process Ut(V ), i.e. Ut(V ) will be stable with probability one, if the following inequality is fulfilled: DV (x) = (V AV −1x, x) + 1 2 n∑ k=1 |V BkV −1x|2 − n∑ k=1 (V BkV −1x, x)2 < 0, |x| = 1. (7) The mentioned arguments allow us to formulate the following theorem. 60 A. C. CHANI Theorem. The process Ut defined as a solution of Eq. (6) will be stable with probability one, if there exists a symmetric positive definite matrix V , for which inequality (7) is fulfilled. The formulated theorem makes sense, if there exist the stable processes Ut with proba- bility one, for which condition (3) is not fulfilled. We provide two simple examples which show that such processes exist. In addition, it is useful to simultaneously clarify the issue about the stability of the corresponding processes in the square mean sense. The point is that neglecting the third term on the left-hand side of inequality (7) turns it into the necessary and sufficient condition of stability in the quadratic mean sense: (V AV −1x, x) + 1 2 n∑ k=1 |V BkV x−1|2 < 0, |x| = 1. (8) In fact, if we introduce the designation V 2 = C, then inequality (8) is equivalent to ((A∗C + CA)y, y) + n∑ k=1 (B∗ kCBky, y) < 0, |y| = 1, (9) where y = |V −1x|−1V −1x. The fact of the existence of a symmetric positive definite matrix C, for which inequality (9) is fulfilled, is the necessary and sufficient condition of stability in the quadratic mean sense for the solution of Eq. (1) ([1], p. 227, Theorem 12 and p. 221, formula (47)). Example 1. Let Ut be a solution of Eq. (6) in the phase space L(R2). We choose the stable matrices A = ( −λ a 0 −λ ) , λ > 0, B1 = ( μ b 0 μ ) , B2 = B3 = ... = Bn = 0. Concerning the parameters a, μ, b, we assume that they are connected by the equation a + μb = 0. (10) Let us deal with the stability of the process Ut in the square mean sense. To this end, we rewrite condition (8) in the matrix form: D = V AV −1 + V −1A∗V + V −1B∗ 1V 2B1V −1 < 0. The left-hand side of this inequality is a homogeneous function of the zero order in V . Therefore, it is sufficient to search for a matrix V in the form V = ( 1 β β α ) , Δ = α − β2 > 0. We have V AV −1 = 1 Δ ( 1 β β α )( −λ a 0 −λ )( α −β −β 1 ) = = 1 Δ ( −λΔ − aβ a −aβ2 −λΔ + aβ ) , V −1A∗V = (V AV −1)∗ = 1 Δ ( −λΔ − aβ −aβ2 a −λΔ + aβ ) , V AV −1 + V −1A∗V = 1 Δ ( −2(λΔ + aβ) a(1 − β2) a(1 − β2) −2(λΔ − aβ) ) . ON THE STABILITY FOR A CLASS OF STOCHASTIC SEMIGROUPS 61 Further, V B1V −1 = 1 Δ ( 1 β β α )( μ b 0 μ )( α −β −β 1 ) = 1 Δ ( μΔ − bβ b −bβ2 μΔ + bβ ) , V −1B∗ 1V = (V B1V −1)∗ = 1 Δ ( μΔ − bβ −bβ2 b μΔ + bβ ) , V −1B∗ 1V 2B1V −1 = 1 Δ2 ( (μΔ − bβ)2 + b2β4 μb(1 − β2)Δ − b2β(1 + β2) μb(1 − β2)Δ − b2β(1 + β2) (μΔ + bβ)2 + b2 ) . After simple transformations with regard for equality (10), we get finally D = 1 Δ2 ( (μ2 − 2λ)Δ2 + b2β(1 + β2) −b2β(1 + β2) −b2β(1 + β2) (μ2 − 2λ)Δ2 + b2(1 + β2) ) . For the matrix D to be negative definite, it is necessary and sufficient that the system of inequalities { (μ2 − 2λ)Δ2 + b2β2(1 + β2) < 0, det D = (μ2 − 2λ) [ (μ2 − 2λ)Δ2 + b2(1 + β2)2 ] > 0 be satisfied. Treating Δ ∈ (0,∞) and β ∈ (−∞,∞) as independent variables, we draw conclusion that this system of inequalities has a solution if and only if μ2 < 2λ. For arbitrary β, it is sufficient to take Δ > b2(1 + β2)2 2λ − μ2 . Thus, the relevant solution Ut will be stable in the square mean in the region of param- eters Q2 = {(λ, a, μ, b) : λ > 0, a + μb = 0, μ2 < 2λ}. We now examine the question of the stability of Ut with probability one. We have 2DV (x) = ( (V AV −1 + V −1A∗V + V −1B∗ 1V 2B1V −1)x, x ) − 2(V B1V −1x, x)2 = = 1 Δ2 { [ (μ2 − 2λ)Δ2 + b2β2(1 + β2) ] x2 1 − 2b2β(1 + β2)x1x2 + [ (μ2 − 2λ)Δ2+ +b2(1 + β2) ] x2 2 − 2 [ (μΔ − bβ)x2 1 + b(1 − β2)x1x2 + (μΔ + bβ)x2 2 ]2} = = 1 Δ2 { [ (μ2 − 2λ)Δ2 + b2β2(1 + β2) ] x2 1 − 2b2β(1 + β2)x1x2 + [ (μ2 − 2λ)Δ2+ +b2(1 + β2) ] (1 − x2 1) − 2 [ μΔ + bβ − 2bβx2 1 + b(1 − β2)x1x2 ]2} = = 1 Δ2 { (μ2 − 2λ)Δ2 + b2(1 + β2) − 2(μΔ + bβ)2 + b [ b(β4 − 1) + 8β(μΔ + bβ) ] x2 1− −2b [ bβ(1 + β2) + 2(1 − β2)(μΔ + bβ) ] x1x2 − 2b2 [ (1 − β2)x1x2 − 2βx2 1 ]2 . For β = 0, 2DV (x) = −(μ2 + 2λ) + 1 Δ2 (b2x2 2 − 4bμΔx1x2 − 2b2x2 1x 2 2), x2 1 + x2 2 = 1. Having selected a rather big value Δ = α, we define the symmetric positive definite matrix V = ( 1 0 0 α ) , Δ = α > 0, 62 A. C. CHANI for which condition (7) of Theorem will be fulfilled: DV (x) < 0 with |x| = 1. This condition quarantees the stability of the process Ut on the set Q0 = {(λ, a, μ, b) : λ > 0, a + μb = 0}. Concerning condition (3) with Δ = 1, we get 2D(x) = 2DI(x) = −(μ2 + 2λ) + b2x2 2 − 4bμx1x2 − 2b2x2 1x 2 2, x2 1 + x2 2 = 1. Calculating the functional 2D(x) at the points x1 = (0; 1), x2 = (1; 0), x3 = ( 1√ 2 ; 1√ 2 ) , x4 = ( 1√ 2 ;− 1√ 2 , ) we obtain −(μ2 + 2λ) + b2, −(μ2 + 2λ), −(μ2 + 2λ) − 4bμ, −(μ2 + 2λ) + 4bμ, respectively. Therefore, for the fulfillment of condition (3), it is necessary that b2∨4|bμ| < μ2 + 2λ. This means that the set of stability Q1 which is defined by inequality (3) lies in the region Q = {(λ, a, μ, b) : λ > 0, a + μb = 0, b2 ∨ 4|μb| < μ2 + 2λ}. In this case, Q1 ⊂ Q ⊂ Q0 and Q = Q0. The exact description of the set Q1 is not the purpose of the present work and demands a separate study. As a result, we obtain the following picture: Q2 ⊂ Q0 and Q2 = Q0, Q1 ⊂ Q0 and Q1 = Q0. Example 2. In Example 1, we change only the matrix A and choose it to be unstable: A = ( λ a 0 λ ) , λ > 0, B1 = ( μ b 0 μ ) , B2 = B3 = ... = Bn = 0, a + μb = 0. Then Q2 = ∅, Q0 = {(λ, a, μ, b) : λ > 0, a + μb = 0, 2λ < μ2}, Q1 ⊂ Q = {(λ, a, μ, b) : λ > 0, a + μb = 0, 2λ + (b2 ∨ 4|bμ|) < μ2}. Bibliography 1. A. V. Skorokhod, Asymptotic methods of theory of stochastic differential equations, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1987. E-mail : chani@iamm.ac.donetsk.ua