Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix

A semi-Markov process with finite state space and continuous time without finiteness condition of a mean stay time of this process in every fixed state is considered. The asymptotic behaviour of the renewal matrix at infinity is established under condition that the distribution tail of the stay time of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Date:2006
Main Author: Buhrii, N.V.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Інститут математики НАН України 2006
Online Access:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/4439
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Journal Title:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Cite this:Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix / N. V. Buhrii // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2006. — Т. 12 (28), № 1-2. — С. 33–37. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв.— англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-4439
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-44392009-11-11T12:00:28Z Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix Buhrii, N.V. A semi-Markov process with finite state space and continuous time without finiteness condition of a mean stay time of this process in every fixed state is considered. The asymptotic behaviour of the renewal matrix at infinity is established under condition that the distribution tail of the stay time of the semi-Markov process in every fixed state is a regularly varying function at infinity with exponent −1. 2006 Article Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix / N. V. Buhrii // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2006. — Т. 12 (28), № 1-2. — С. 33–37. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв.— англ. 0321-3900 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/4439 519.21 en Інститут математики НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description A semi-Markov process with finite state space and continuous time without finiteness condition of a mean stay time of this process in every fixed state is considered. The asymptotic behaviour of the renewal matrix at infinity is established under condition that the distribution tail of the stay time of the semi-Markov process in every fixed state is a regularly varying function at infinity with exponent −1.
format Article
author Buhrii, N.V.
spellingShingle Buhrii, N.V.
Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix
author_facet Buhrii, N.V.
author_sort Buhrii, N.V.
title Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix
title_short Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix
title_full Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix
title_fullStr Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix
title_sort investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix
publisher Інститут математики НАН України
publishDate 2006
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/4439
citation_txt Investigation of the asymptotics of a renewal matrix / N. V. Buhrii // Theory of Stochastic Processes. — 2006. — Т. 12 (28), № 1-2. — С. 33–37. — Бібліогр.: 8 назв.— англ.
work_keys_str_mv AT buhriinv investigationoftheasymptoticsofarenewalmatrix
first_indexed 2025-07-02T07:41:03Z
last_indexed 2025-07-02T07:41:03Z
_version_ 1836520113206984704
fulltext Theory of Stochastic Processes Vol. 12 (28), no. 1–2, 2006, pp. 33–37 UDC 519.21 N. V. BUHRII INVESTIGATION OF THE ASYMPTOTICS OF A RENEWAL MATRIX A semi-Markov process with finite state space and continuous time without finiteness condition of a mean stay time of this process in every fixed state is considered. The asymptotic behaviour of the renewal matrix at infinity is established under condition that the distribution tail of the stay time of the semi-Markov process in every fixed state is a regularly varying function at infinity with exponent −1. Introducton The classical renewal theorems give the asymptotic behaviour of the renewal function associated with a distribution F at infinity (see [1, §12.1]). These theorems are valid when the mean of the distribution F is equal to infinity. In the case of a regularly varying distribution function tail 1−F at infinity with exponent −α, 0 ≤ α ≤ 1, Erickson defined more precisely the behaviour of the renewal function at infinity (see [2, Theorems 1,5]). An analogy of the renewal function for a semi-Markov process with finite state space is the so-called renewal matrix associated with a semi-Markov matrix P . If the matrix P (∞) is irreducible and a mean stay time of the semi-Markov process in every fixed state is finite, then the asymptotic behaviour of the renewal matrix is well known (see [1, §12.6]). V.S. Korolyuk and A.F. Turbin have investigated a limit properties of the renewal matrix too (see, [3, Chapter 4]). In this paper, a semi-Markov process with finite state space without finiteness condition of a mean stay time of this process in every fixed state is considered. The asymptotics of the renewal matrix is found under condition that the distribution tail of this stay time is a regularly varying function at infinity with exponent α = −1. The asymptotic behaviour of the renewal matrix Let X(t), t ≥ 0, be a semi-Markov process with finite state space {1, 2, . . . , m} and continuous time. Define τ1 = τ = inf{t > 0 : X(t) �= X(0)}, . . . , τn = inf{t > τn−1 : X(t) �= X(τn−1)}, n ≥ 2. A sequence of the random quantities X(0), X(τ1), . . . , X(τn), . . . creates the so-called imbedded Markov chain in X(t) with the transition probabilities pij = P{X(τ) = j | X(0) = i}, i, j = 1, m. 2000 AMS Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 60J25. Key words and phrases. Semi-Markov process, renewal matrix, regular and slow variation, infinite mean. 33 34 N. V. BUHRII The matrix P = ||pij ||mi,j=1 is irreducible. Therefore, a unique stationary distribution p1, p2, . . . , pm exists such that pi ≥ 0, m∑ i=1 pi = 1, pj = m∑ i=1 pipij , j = 1, m. Denote Fij(t) = P{τ ≤ t, X(τ) = j | X(0) = i}, Fi(t) = m∑ j=1 Fij(t) = P{τ ≤ t | X(0) = i}, i = 1, m. Assume that the mean stay time of the semi-Markov process X(t) in every fixed state is infinite, that is, Miτ = M{τ | X(0) = i} = ∫ ∞ 0 x dFi(x) = ∫ ∞ 0 (1 − Fi(x)) dx = +∞, i = 1, m. Consider the Markov renewal equation (see [3, p. 38]) qi(t) = bi(t) + m∑ j=1 ∫ t 0 Fij{dx}qj(t − x), i = 1, m, t ≥ 0, (1) where the matrix F (t) = ||Fij(t)||mi,j=1 is semi-Markov. The solution of Eq. (1) is (see [3, p. 40]) qi(t) = m∑ j=1 ∫ t 0 Uij{dx}bj(t − x) = = m∑ j=1 ∫ 1 0 Uij{tdx}bj(t(1 − x)), i = 1, m, (2) where Uij{[0, t]} = Uij(t), i, j = 1, m, are the elements of the renewal matrix U(t) which is an analogy of the renewal function, that is, U(t) = ∞∑ n=0 Fn∗(t), (3) where F 0∗(t) = E ≡ ||δij ||mi,j=1 is the unit matrix, F 1∗(t) = F (t), F (n+1)∗(t) = ∫ t 0 Fn∗(t − u)F{du}, n ∈ N. Theorem 1. Let 1 − Fi(t) ∼ ai L(t) t , i = 1, m, as t → ∞, (4) where L is a slowly varying function at infinity, and a1, . . . , am are some nonnegative constants such that ∑m i=1 aipi > 0. Then lim t→∞ 1 t L1(t)Uij(t) = pj∑m i=1 aipi , i, j = 1, m, (5) where L1(t) = ∫ t 1/d L(x) x dx, d > 0. INVESTIGATION OF THE ASYMPTOTICS OF A RENEWAL MATRIX 35 Remark 1. Since ∑m i=1 pi = 1, the condition ∑m i=1 aipi > 0 excludes a possibility, when ai = 0, i = 1, m. Proof. Find the asymptotics of the renewal measure U(tx) = ||Uij(tx)||mi,j=1, x ∈ [0, 1], as t → ∞. Denote, by Û(λ) = ∫ ∞ 0 e−λxU{dx}, λ > 0, the Laplace transform of a measure U and, by F̂ (λ) = ∫ ∞ 0 e−λxF{dx}, λ > 0, the Laplace transform of a distribution F . From (3), using properties of the Laplace transformation (see [4, p. 500]), we have Û(λ) = ∞∑ n=0 ( F̂ (λ) )n . Count the norm of the matrix F̂ (λ): ||F̂ (λ)|| = sup 1≤i≤m m∑ j=1 |F̂ij(λ)| = sup 1≤i≤m m∑ j=1 ∫ ∞ 0 e−λxFij{dx} = = sup 1≤i≤m ∫ ∞ 0 e−λxFi{dx}. Integrating by parts, we obtain∫ ∞ 0 e−λxFi{dx} = e−λxFi(x) ∣∣∣∣ ∞ 0 +λ ∫ ∞ 0 Fi(x)e−λxdx = ∫ ∞ 0 Fi ( t λ ) e−tdt. By the geometrical matter of an integral, we get∫ ∞ 0 Fi ( t λ ) e−tdt < ∫ ∞ 0 e−tdt, i = 1, m. Therefore ||F̂ (λ)|| = sup 1≤i≤m ∫ ∞ 0 Fi ( t λ ) e−tdt < 1. Thus, by Theorem 5 in [5, p. 216], we obtain ∞∑ n=0 ( F̂ (λ) )n = [E − F̂ (λ)]−1. Hence, Û(λ) = [E − F̂ (λ)]−1. (6) For a fixed λ, consider the matrix sequence { F̂ ( λ t )} as t → ∞. It is a monotonous nondecreasing matrix sequence with nonnegative elements, for which F̂ ( λ t ) → P for t → ∞, where P = ||pij ||mi,j=1 is the transition matrix of the imbedded Markov chain. Since P is an irreducible matrix, we obtain (see [6, p. 599]) ct ( E − F̂ ( λ t ))−1 → ||1 · pj||mi,j=1 as t → ∞, (7) 36 N. V. BUHRII where ct = 1 − ( p, F̂ ( λ t ) · 1 ) , p = (p1, . . . , pm), 1 = (1, . . . , 1). It follows from Theorem 1 in [7, p. 30] that, for all λ > 0, 1 − F̂i ( λ t ) ∼ λai t · L1 ( t λ ) , i = 1, m, as t → ∞. Consequently, ct = 1 − ( p, F̂ ( λ t ) · 1 ) = m∑ i=1 pi ( 1 − F̂i ( λ t )) ∼ ∼ m∑ i=1 pi λai t · L1 ( t λ ) as t → ∞. Since L1 is a slowly varying function at infinity (see [8, p. 220]), we get ct ∼ λ t L1(t) m∑ i=1 aipi as t → ∞. (8) Thus, in view of (7) and (8), relation (7) yields λ t L1(t) m∑ i=1 aipi ∫ ∞ 0 e− λ t xU{dx} → ||1 · pj ||mi,j=1 as t → ∞, that is, 1 t L1(t) ∫ ∞ 0 e−λuU{tdu} → 1 λ ∑m i=1 aipi · ||1 · pj ||mi,j=1 as t → ∞ Whence we get 1 t L1(t) ∫ ∞ 0 e−λuUij{tdu} → pj λ ∑m i=1 aipi , i, j = 1, m, as t → ∞. By the generalized continuity theorem (see [4, c. 499]), the quantity pj λ ∑m i=1 aipi is a Laplace transform of some measure pjμ1 such that∫ ∞ 0 e−λuμ1{du} = 1 λ ∑m i=1 aipi , λ > 0, (9) and 1 t L1(t)Uij{tdu} → pjμ1{du}, i, j = 1, m, as t → ∞ (10) for every bounded continuity interval of the measure μ1. Since ∫ ∞ 0 e−λudu = 1 λ , we see from (9) that μ1 is the Lebesgue measure multiplied by a constant. Therefore, the interval (0, 1) is a continuity interval of the measure μ1. Thus, we get from (10) that lim t→∞ 1 t L1(t)Uij{(0, t)} = pjμ1{(0, 1)} = pj∑m i=1 aipi , i, j = 1, m. INVESTIGATION OF THE ASYMPTOTICS OF A RENEWAL MATRIX 37 Note that Uij{(0, t)} = Uij(t− 0)−Uij(0), i, j = 1, m. From (3), we obtain Uij(0) = δij , i, j = 1, m. Since L1(t) → ∞ as t → ∞, we count, by the L’Hospital rule, lim t→∞ L1(t) t = lim t→∞ ∫ t 1/d L(x) x dx t = lim t→∞ L(t) t = 0, i = 1, m. Consequently, lim t→∞ 1 t L1(t)Uij{(0, t)} = lim t→∞ 1 t L1(t)[Uij(t − 0) − δij ] = = lim t→∞ 1 t L1(t)Uij(t) = pj∑m i=1 aipi , i, j = 1, m. Theorem 1 is proved. Bibliography 1. I.N. Kovalenko, N.Yu. Kuznetsov, V.M. Shurenkov, Chance Processes: Reference Book, Nauko- va Dumka, Kyiv, 1983. 2. K.B. Erickson, Strong renewal theorems with infinite mean, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 151 (1970), 263–291. 3. V.S. Korolyuk, A.F. Turbin, Semi-Markov Processes and Their Applications, Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 1976. 4. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Wiley, New York, 1970. 5. A.N. Kolmogorov, S.V. Fomin, Elements of the Theory of Functions and Functional Analysis, Nauka, Moscow, 1972. 6. V.M. Shurenkov, Ya.I. Yeleiko, Limit distributions of time mean values for a semi-Markov process with finite stste space, Ukr. Mat. Zh. 31 (1979), no. 5, 598–603. 7. Ya.I. Yeleiko, N.V. Buhrii, An asymptotics of Laplace transform of a distribution which has a regularly varying tail with exponent -1, Math. Meth. Physicomech. Fields 44 (2001), no. 2, 30–33. 8. S. Parameswaran, Partition function whose logarithms are slowly oscillating, Trans. Amer. Soc. 100 (1961), 217–240. E-mail : ol buhrii@ua.fm