Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action?

From chemical point of view acetylcholine (ACh) is a quaternary ammonium salt whose biological importance is connected with its role as a neurotransmitter between neurones and other neurocellular junctions. Earlier we have postulated (Kurchii, 1998) and then confirmed (Kurchii, Kurchii, 2000) that A...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Datum:2009
1. Verfasser: Kurchii, B.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України 2009
Online Zugang:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/7373
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Zitieren:Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action? / B.A. Kurchii // Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta. — 2009. — Т. 7, № 1. — С. 36-44. — Бібліогр.: 75 назв. — англ.

Institution

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-7373
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-73732010-03-30T12:02:16Z Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action? Kurchii, B.A. From chemical point of view acetylcholine (ACh) is a quaternary ammonium salt whose biological importance is connected with its role as a neurotransmitter between neurones and other neurocellular junctions. Earlier we have postulated (Kurchii, 1998) and then confirmed (Kurchii, Kurchii, 2000) that ACh under influence of physiological solution and alkaline mixture was decomposed with releasing of ethylene. Unfortunately using gas chromatograph we could not detected another two peaks on the chromatogram (Kurchii, Kurchii, 2000). Here we identified one of two unknown peaks: it is ethylene oxide. We have revealed that ethylene oxide was released in the quantity much more than ethylene during 10-20 min of decomposition in air or in drop of physiological solution. We have concluded that biological effects of ACh can be caused by action of ethylene oxide that is a very reactive agent and this is a prompt effect for short distance. Ethylene can migrate on the long distance and cause slow effects, but it should be preliminary activated because under normal conditions (temperature and pressure) it is a very inert chemical and cannot react with any substance. Nevertheless, it can be in vivo activated in the free radical addition reactions. Also as follows from our results the question about specific receptors for ACh is questionable. З точки зору хімії ацетилхолін (АХ) є четвертинна амонієва сполука, біологічна роль якої пов’язана з нейропередачею між нейронами та іншими нейроклітинними з’єднаннями. Раніше нами запропоновано (Kurchii, 1998), а потім і підтверджено (Kurchii, Kurchii, 2000), що АХ за дії фізіологічного розчину і лугу розкладався з утворенням етилену. На жаль, ми не змогли визначити два інших піки, отриманих на газовому хроматографі. У цій статті ми ідентифікували один із двох невідомих піків — окис етилену. Встановлено, що окис етилену виділявся в кількості значно більшій за таку ж кількість етилену в атмосфері повітря або в краплі фізіологічного розчину. З’ясовано, що біологічні ефекти ацетилхоліну можуть бути зумовлені дією окису етилену, який є хімічно активною сполукою, і це є швидка його дія на короткі відстані. Етилен же може мігрувати на далекі відстані, спричинюючи сповільнені ефекти, але тільки за умови його активації, бо за нормальних умов (температури і тиску) він є неактивною сполукою і не може вступати в реакції. Проте in vivo етилен може активуватися в реакціях приєднання вільних радикалів. Також, як свідчать здобуті дані, питання про специфічні рецептори АХ залишається дискусійним. 2009 Article Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action? / B.A. Kurchii // Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta. — 2009. — Т. 7, № 1. — С. 36-44. — Бібліогр.: 75 назв. — англ. 1814-9758 http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/7373 en Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description From chemical point of view acetylcholine (ACh) is a quaternary ammonium salt whose biological importance is connected with its role as a neurotransmitter between neurones and other neurocellular junctions. Earlier we have postulated (Kurchii, 1998) and then confirmed (Kurchii, Kurchii, 2000) that ACh under influence of physiological solution and alkaline mixture was decomposed with releasing of ethylene. Unfortunately using gas chromatograph we could not detected another two peaks on the chromatogram (Kurchii, Kurchii, 2000). Here we identified one of two unknown peaks: it is ethylene oxide. We have revealed that ethylene oxide was released in the quantity much more than ethylene during 10-20 min of decomposition in air or in drop of physiological solution. We have concluded that biological effects of ACh can be caused by action of ethylene oxide that is a very reactive agent and this is a prompt effect for short distance. Ethylene can migrate on the long distance and cause slow effects, but it should be preliminary activated because under normal conditions (temperature and pressure) it is a very inert chemical and cannot react with any substance. Nevertheless, it can be in vivo activated in the free radical addition reactions. Also as follows from our results the question about specific receptors for ACh is questionable.
format Article
author Kurchii, B.A.
spellingShingle Kurchii, B.A.
Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action?
author_facet Kurchii, B.A.
author_sort Kurchii, B.A.
title Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action?
title_short Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action?
title_full Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action?
title_fullStr Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action?
title_full_unstemmed Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action?
title_sort acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action?
publisher Інститут молекулярної біології і генетики НАН України
publishDate 2009
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/7373
citation_txt Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action? / B.A. Kurchii // Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta. — 2009. — Т. 7, № 1. — С. 36-44. — Бібліогр.: 75 назв. — англ.
work_keys_str_mv AT kurchiiba acetylcholineandethylenedotheysharesimilarreceptorsandbiologicalaction
first_indexed 2025-07-02T10:11:58Z
last_indexed 2025-07-02T10:11:58Z
_version_ 1836529608203173888
fulltext Introduction. Biogenic amine acetylcholine is a rather simple molecule of formula (CH3COOCH2CH2N+(CH3)3 [10]. Recent investi� gations suggest that ACh is not present only in neurons and glial cells of the nervous system but also is synthesized in epithelial, mesothelial, endothelial cells, alveolar macrophage, and white blood cells [38, 44, 76]. ACh induces conformational changes and then concomitant cellular changes through their interactions with membrane�bound proteins. Its neurophysiological action is mediated by either nicoticic (nAChR) or muscarinic (mAChR) receptors. The released ACh by nerve impulse at the terminal region diffuses across the synaptic cleft and by binding to protein receptors in the postsynaptic membrane acts to produce a con� formational change in the postjunctional mem� brane of the motor end�plate, providing for an increase in permeability to cations, especially Na+ and K+ and this results in a muscle contrac� tion caused by depolarization of the membrane of the muscle cell. ACh is enzymatically hydro� lyzed by acetylcholinesterase in the synaptic cleft into choline and acetate. Choline is then transported back into the presynaptic cell and through the action of acetyltransferase is trans� formed into ACh [10, 32, 33, 42, 70]. Thus, nAChR converters exstracellular sig� nals into intracellular effects. In the most cases the receptors are composed of three functional parts: a signal receiving (ligand binding) part "R", effector part "E" that converts signal on to the inner cell, and part "T", the so�called trans� ducer that connects "R" and "E" parts (Fig. 1) [38]. 36 Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action? B.A. Kurchii* Institute of Plant Physiology and Genetics, NAS of Ukraine 31/17 Vasylkivska Str., Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine Summary. From chemical point of view acetylcholine (ACh) is a quaternary ammonium salt whose biological importance is connected with its role as a neurotransmitter between neurones and other neurocellular junctions. Earlier we have postulated (Kurchii, 1998) and then confirmed (Kurchii, Kurchii, 2000) that ACh under influ� ence of physiological solution and alkaline mixture was decomposed with releasing of ethylene. Unfortunately using gas chromatograph we could not detected another two peaks on the chromatogram (Kurchii, Kurchii, 2000). Here we identified one of two unknown peaks: it is ethylene oxide. We have revealed that ethylene oxide was released in the quantity much more than ethylene during 10�20 min of decomposition in air or in drop of physiological solution. We have concluded that biological effects of ACh can be caused by action of ethylene oxide that is a very reactive agent and this is a prompt effect for short distance. Ethylene can migrate on the long distance and cause slow effects, but it should be preliminary activated because under normal conditions (tem� perature and pressure) it is a very inert chemical and cannot react with any substance. Nevertheless, it can be in vivo activated in the free radical addition reactions. Also as follows from our results the question about specific receptors for ACh is questionable. Keywords: acetylcholine, ethylene, ethylene oxide, free radicals, receptors. www.bioorganica.org.ua Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta 1 (2009) 36—44 * Corresponding author. Tel.: +38044�2575160 E�mail address: kurchii@mail.ru © Б.О. Курчій, 2009 Surprisingly ACh is not only distributed in vertebrates and invertebrates but also in a plant kingdom [30, 35, 72]. As in the animals ACh is synthesized in plants via acetyltransferase (EC 2.3.1.6) [69] and decomposed by acetylcholines� terase (EC 3.1.1.7) [55, 56]. Little is known about the role of ACh in the plants. It is proposed that ACh can act in the plants as a local hormone in phytochrome�mediated responses [40] and pro� duces alteration of ion channel activity [33, 35, 72]. Hartmann and Gupta [35] reported data confirming the existence of ‘ACh�binding sites’ in bean seedlings. However, the biochemical characteristics of ACh receptors remain unclear in plants. It is interestingly to note that from chemical viewpoint ACh is a quaternary ammonium salt that theoretically in appropriate conditions can be decomposed in accordance to Hofmann’s rule with olefin formation [22, 28, 29]: If ACh may be decomposed in vivo with ethy� lene releasing, hence the question on the ACh receptor still seems to be open. In order to understand the molecular mechanisms that are responsible for the biological action of ACh we have examined the hypothesis [45] that physio� logical effects of ACh might be attributable to its decomposition with ethylene formation. Herein we report an extension of this approach toward the generation of ethylene and ethylene oxide from ACh. Material and methods. The chemicals ACh.HCl and cholin.HCl used in this work were from «Mosmedpreparaty». Ethylene oxide was pur� chased from «Sigma». Chemicals were decom� posed in 10 cm3 flasks with rubber caps at room temperature and 1 cm3 of head space gas was analyzed for ethylene. Ethylene was determined by a gas chromatograph («Selmihrom», Sumy, Ukraine) filled with a flame�ionization detector and a 2 m x 3.2 mm stainless�steel column packed with Poropack�Q (80�100 mesh). The oven temperature was 100 °C and the N2, H2 and O2 (air) flow rates were 40, 40 and 350 ml min�1, respectively. Ethylene identification was based on the retention time compared with the C2H4 standard. A computer program was used to cal� culate the quantities of ethylene in the samples. Experimental data. Earlier we reported that ACh.HCl was decomposed to form ethylene [49]. Unfortunately we could not detect two another peaks. In this work we have identified that one from the unknown peaks is ethylene oxide (Fig. 2). Also ethylene oxide was found in the flasks where to ACh we added several drops of 0,9 NaCl. Ethylene and ethylene oxide were already found in the flasks after 10 min of expo� sition. Thus, ACh was decomposed with forma� tion of ethylene and ethylene oxide. In our expe� riments the quantity of formed ethylene oxide was markedly higher than such of ethylene. Unfortunately we could not detect one peak in the chromatogram. Discussion. As mentioned above biological action of ACh is explained in terms of an inter� action with receptors for this chemical. This interaction is believed to be a physicochemical reaction that depends on the molecule of ACh Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action? 37www.bioorganica.org.ua Signal R T E Effect Membrane Fig. 1. The triune receptor concept (adapted from 38). H C _+ C N (CH3 ) OH H2 O ++ N (CH3 ) 3H2 C CH2 Fig. 2. Chromatogram from gas chromatography analysis of products formed during ACh decompo� sition. The retention times of the compounds in the chromatogram are: 39 sec, ethylene; 315 sec, ethy� lene oxide. being attracted to a corresponding or a comple� mentary molecular structure of the receptor. Two types of ACh receptors are known as asso� ciated with animal cell membranes mediating physiological effects of ACh: nicotinic and mus� carinic, being selectively activated by the ago� nists nicotine and muscarine, respectively [4, 17, 23]. There are also numerous subtypes of these receptors. If hormone perception is necessary for the coordinated growth and development of multi� cellular eukaryotes one of the most intriguing questions is how do the receptors transmit the signal? In animals it is involved in two distinct pathways: the nicotinic receptor, in which the channel is activated directly by acetylcholine, and the muscarinic receptor, which requires an indirect G protein�based pathway [25, 27, 65]. NNiiccoottiinniicc RReecceeppttoorrss.. These receptors are found in both the central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral nervous system (PNS) [52]. Nicotinic receptors are divided into the subtypes nicotinic�N receptors (at ganglionic autonomic synapses) and nicotinic�M receptors (at neuro� muscular synapses). Nicotinic�M receptors cause end�plate depolarization and muscle contrac� tion, whereas nicotinic�N receptors are involved in ganglionic transmission [9, 34, 37, 43]. MMuussccaarriinniicc RReecceeppttoorrss.. Five subtypes of mus� carinic receptors have been identified: M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 [26, 39, 50, 53]. M1 receptors are widespread in the brain, whereas M2 receptors primarily cluster in the cardiovascular system. M3 receptors are found mainly in smooth mus� cles and secretory glands. Much research has been done to distinguish these sub�types, but much is stil unfolding. Functions of M4 and M5 are speculative at present. Muscarinic receptors play a major role in the functioning of the pPNS and CNS. It is believed interaction of acetylcholine with members of the muscarinic receptor family (M1� M5), which couple to two G proteins: Gi and Gq. When the Gq�coupled receptors, M1, M3, and M5, are stimulated, the βγ subunit of Gq dissoci� ates from the subunits and stimulates phospho� lipase C�β. Phospholipase C�β in turn hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4,5�bisphosphate into ino� sitol 1,4,5�trisphosphate and di�acylglycerol, both of which activate protein kinase C (PKC). PKC then activates MAPK by unknown mecha� nisms. Also mAChRs activates MAPK through the Gi�coupled receptors [24]. It is suggested that mitogen�activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are a family of serine/threo� nine protein kinases that play a crucial role in transmitting signals from the cell surface to re� gulate various cellular functions. MAPK is acti� vated when phosphorylated on both a threonine and a tyrosine residue [67]; thus, changes in the phosphorylation state reflect changes in activity [36, 66]. The mode of signaling that uses this type of phosphorylation has been referred to as the two�component system. EEtthhyylleennee rreecceeppttoorrss.. The plant hormone ethy� lene is a simple two�carbon (CH2=CH2) gaseous plant growth regulator that has profound effects on plant growth and development. Ethylene is formed from methionine via S�ade� nosyl�L�methionine (AdoMet) and the cyclic non�protein amino acid 1�aminocyclopropane� 1�carboxylic acid (ACC). ACC is formed from AdoMet by the action of ACC synthase (ACS) and the conversion of ACC to ethylene is carried out by ACC oxidase (ACO) [1, 44]. This plant growth regulator plays essential roles in integrating numerous responses to ethy� lene throughout life of the plant, including pro� motion of seed germination, induction of ripen� ing in climacteric fruits, promotion or inhibition of flowering, leaf and petal abscission, senes� cence, and plant responses to stresses such as those induced by pathogens, flooding or drought [1, 58, 59]. Regulation of ethylene controlled B.A. Kurchii 38 Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta 1 (2009) Gi/o Membrane M2 receptor Rap 1 GAP II PI3 - kinase Rap 1 GTR Src Shc Grb2 - SOS Ras Raf MEK ERK 1/2 HEK 293T CNS neurons Fig. 3. Schematic representation of some pathways described for the M2 mAChR in various cell lines or in CNS neurons (adopted from 50). events can occur at the level of biosynthesis, catabolism or perception [1, 75]. Although over the past decade great progress has been made in the study of biochemical events involved in ethy� lene:receptor interaction, it is still unclear how this small organic molecule can influence so many aspects of plant growth and development. It is commonly recognized that ethylene may function as signal molecules that trigger the sig� nal transduction pathways in cells. It is now known that eubacteria, archaea, fungi, and plants also have the two�component system [15]. Ethylene perception is the most well studied in Arabidopsis and is mediated by a family of five receptors: ETR1, ERS1, ETR2, ERS2, and EIN4 that have similarity to two�component regulators from bacteria [6, 7, 16, 20]. Each receptor is most� ly composed from the four main domains: sensor, GAF domain (found in cGMP phosphodiesteras� es, adenylate cyclases and Fh1a transcription factors), histidine kinase and response regulator (Fig. 4). The GAF domain is a sequence motif that has been associated with cyclic nucleotide binding sites in a variety of proteins [3]. Ethylene signalling pathway contains both positive and negative regulators. According to the described models [6, 18] the ethylene recep� tors activate the kinase activity of CTR1 in the air (absence of ethylene). CTR1 then actively suppresses the downstream responses, such that EIN2 and the EIN3/EIL transcription factors remain inactive. The binding of ethylene to the receptor is mediated by a copper cofactor [63]. With ethylene binding mediated by a single cop� per ion (Cu) the receptors no longer activate CTR1, and thus CTR1 no longer suppresses the pathway. This leads to the activation of EIN2, induction of the transcriptional cascade, and the establishment of ethylene responses (Fig. 5). CTR1 is a Raf�like ser/thr kinase with similari� ty to a mitogen�activated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAPKKK) (mitogen�activated protein kinase kinase kinase) [2, 14]. EEtthhyylleennee ooxxiiddee.. Ethylene oxide (EO) is an agent that reacts easily with cellular substances such as, for example, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and proteins, without metabolic activa� tion [68]. Among the major reaction product in DNA is N�7(2�hydroxyethyl)guanine, and major reactive sites in hemoglobin are cysteine, histi� dine, and in particular N�terminal valine [12]. EO gas is widely used in the sterilization of medical equipment and materials [13, 73]. EO is an excellent gas for sterilization, but it also affects central and peripheral nervous systems [60�62]. GGeenneerraall mmooddeell ffoorr AACChh aanndd eetthhyylleennee aaccttiioonn iinn bbiioollooggiiccaall ssyysstteemmss.. Aaccording to the classical viewpoint of fast «wiring» transmission, the neurotransmitter is released in the synaptic cleft at a high concentration (up to 0.3 mM) and brief pulse (approximately 1 ms), whereas in the «vol� Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action? 39www.bioorganica.org.ua GAF domainSensor Response regulator Histidine kinase Fig. 4. Schematic representation of the arabidopsis ethylene receptor family (adopted from 6, 20). The four main domains (sensor, GAF domain, histidine kinase and response regulator) of the proteins are indicated. Nramp metal transponter Unknown membrane Ethylene responce ERF ERF1 EIN3 MAPKK MAPKK Repress ethylene responses CTR1MAPKKK CTR1 ATP ADP CH2CH2Air Ethylene receptors Cu Cu ETR1 ETR2 ERS1 ERS2 EIN4 Membrane MAPK MAPK EIN2EIN2 EIN3 ERF transcription factor transcription factor EIN3/EIL Fig. 5. Model for ethylene signal transduction (adapted from 18). In air, ethylene receptors main� tain CTR1 (it is a Raf�like ser/thr kinase with sim� ilarity to a mitogen�activated protein kinase kinase kinase, MAPKKK) in an active state that serves to repress ethylene responses. Inactivating of CTR1 occurs when ethylene is biding to the receptors. This leads to activation of EIN2 and initiation of transcriptional cascade. ume transmission», lower concentrations of the neurotransmitter may more slowly reach a dis� tant target through intercellular space [23]. We believe that ethylene and ethylene oxide formed from ACh share different biological effects: 1) a prompt effect cased by ethylene oxide, and 2) a longer�lasting effect caused by ethylene. Experimental data suggest that exogenously applied labelled ethylene was transformed in plants to ethylene oxide. Thus, Jerie and Hall [41] found that ethylene at physiological concen� tration was metabolized very rapidly to ethylene oxide. Subsequently Blomstrom and Beyer [8] demonstrated that in Pisum the earliest detec� table metabolites were ethylene oxide and its glucose conjugate. The initial ways for metabo� lism and action of ethylene were described by Beyer [5] in the model (Fig. 6), where the first step is ethylene epoxidation. Unfortunately as you can see from Fig. 5 and 6 there is some transformation of ideas during last decades: researchers omitted earlier experimen� tal data concerning ethylene oxide formation. Also we believe that transition metals including copper in the reactive mixture is needed to form free radicals which then is bound to ethylene. Transformation of ethylene into reactive sub� stances in vivo is presented in Fig. 7 [45�48]. There is a little scene of confusion in the biol� ogy of ethylene: ethylene is not an active sub� stance under normal temperature and pressure, and hence, it cannot react with cellular protein� like substances. Nevertheless there is only one type of chemical reactions with ethylene: it can react only with free radicals and thus to form active structures [28, 57]. Some these reactions are illustrated in Fig. 7 [45�48]. Reactive agent ethylene oxide does not require any activation and can act as an initiator of free chain reactions of many cellular sub� stances. Several such reactions are presented in Fig. 8 [46]. From the chemical ethylene oxide properties also the opening of the ethylene oxide ring can result in the free radical formation with cellular substances: Based on the received experimental data we have proposed the following mechanism of ACh and ethylene action (Fig. 9). The cellular functions of mammalian nervous systems depend on tight regulation of both extracellular and intracellular pH. It is shown that synaptic vesicles have a low pH (about 5.5) [54] and the buffering capacity of the synaptic cleft is limited during brief synaptic events [19, 71]. Coreleased with the ACh protons may tran� B.A. Kurchii 40 Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta 1 (2009) Conjugate of ethyleneglycol ( ? ) CO2 Glucose Ethyleneglycol H2O[ O ] O OC C O O ( ? ) CO2 H2C CH2 [ O ] H2C CH2 O Alkilation CO2 ( ? ) OHHO Receptor Cu Receptor Cu O Receptor Cu Receptor Cu Fig. 6. Hypothetical scheme of initial ways for meta� bolism and action of ethylene (adapted from 5). OOHO .O 2 . OH HO. . R . .O + OH . R . . . CH2OH RO+ ROOH ROO H2C . H2C CH3 . + CH2CH2HOOCH2OH + . CH2 H2C CH2CH2CH2 CH2 CH2 CH2OOCH2 H2OO2CH2H2C Fig. 7. Possible mechanisms of in vivo ethylene activation. RCOOH RCONH2 H2S HCN RCHO + + + + + H2O+ ROH+ H2C O CH2 CH2OHCH2HO CH2 OCORCH2HO CH CH2ORHO CH2 CNHOCH2 CH2 SHHOCH2 CH2 NHCORHOCH2 O RHC O CH2 CH2 Fig. 8. Possible reactions of ethylene oxide with cel� lular substances in vivo [46]. O + RH2 C CH 2 H 2 C OCH2 R . siently change pH in the synaptic cleft. Hence, rapid and brief pH changes in the synaptic cleft could modulate synaptic transmission by direct interaction of protons, for example, with postsy� naptic receptors. It is believed that approxi� mately 1 mM ACh is rapidly released into the cleft, causing nearly synchronous activation of all of the postsynaptic nAChRs, in approximate� ly 1 ms. [21]. Nevertheless there is alternative possibility: releasing of ACh from synaptic vesi� cles (pH ∼5.5) to synaptic cleft (pH ∼7.4) leads to ACh decomposition with ethylene oxide and ethylene formation. Unfortunately the concen� trations of ACh that activate postsynaptic AChRs during synaptic events remain unclear. At the same time some part of the ACh is enzy� matically hydrolyzed by acetylcholinesterase in the synaptic cleft to choline and acetate. Experimental evidences suggest that the function of the AChR is influenced by its lipid microenvironment [3]. Ethylene oxide being very reactive agents may immediately react with constituents of the postsynaptic mem� branes causing structural, functional and con� formational changes in them. For example, it can react with the membrane enzymes or with the membrane lipidic phase. In the last case it initi� ates free radical chain reactions that lead to the changes in physico�chemical properties of mem� branes and thus triggers numerous biochemical and physiological reactions. For example, initia� tion in the membranes of non�controlled by antioxidative molecules and enzymatic free radi� cal chain reactions can lead to destroying in the lipid/protein interaction and conformational rearrangements, the opening of sodium chan� nels, hence depolarization, then muscle contrac� tion, etc. The disbalance of ions in the compart� ments of the cell as in the different cells can also take place. Finally, as you can see from the scheme the reactions of ACh with cellular sub� stances occur after ACh activation, i.e. transfor� mation into reactive forms. Hence, the formation of ACh/protein complexes may not be a cause but a consequence of its biological activation. In conclusion, we would like to stress that the major finding of this report is that ACh is not stable substances and under some conditions can be decomposed in vitro to form ethylene and ethylene oxide. In this connection we proposed that complexes ACh (ethylene and ethylene oxide) with putative receptors are formed after their biological activation, i.e. transformation in� to free radical state. Chemicals in the free radi� cal state may conjugate with any cellular sub� stance to form complexes with putative recep� tors that can be reactive or not. Nevertheless at least one question remains to be answered. How many receptors can be pre� sent at the plasmalemma? The question is not idle. The answers to these questions will provide important insight not only into the mechanism activation but also into the molecular mecha� nisms of action of biologically active substances. It is believed that about 20 % of all cellular pro� teins are presented at the membranes of living cells [51] and this can count approximately 10 000 proteins. Unfortunately the quantity of plasmalemma proteins is not yet fully known. Moreover the quantity of these proteins is in contradiction with information about known several thousands of natural biologically active agents. For instance only in the plant kingdom many tens of thousands of plant bioactive sub� stances have been identified [11]. Thus, there are no structural grounds to think that all bio� logical effects of growth regulating substances are mediated through protein receptors. In addi� tion the precise molecular mechanisms underly� Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action? 41www.bioorganica.org.ua CELLULAR MEMBRANE: Initiation of the lipid peroxidation, increasing in the level of free radicals in the membranes and cytoplasm Signaling agents Oxidation of cellular substances, changes in the physico-chemical properties of membranes: destroying in the lipid/protein interactions, conformational rearrangememts, changes in the rigidity of membranes. Decomposition of membranes with formation of diverse biologically active substances Changes in the active and passive traffic of ions and molecules through the cellular membranes Disruption of the chains of ATP synthesis Changes in activities of membrane- bonded enzymes Changes in the activities of cytoplasmic enzymes Signaling agents Disturbance of current physiological functions Changes in the cellular (cellular compartments) levels of Ca2+, Cl , K+, Na+, H+, Mg2+ ions. Alteration of the ion channel activity. Depolarization of membranes - CH3 CH3 CH3+ NCH 2 CH 2 O CCH3C O Acetylcholine . RCH 2CH 2 CH 2 . CH 2 ROO CH 2 . CH 2HO H 2 C O CH 2 Conjugation with cellular substances Decomposition to choline and acetate Formation of stable complexes with putative receptors Signaling pathways Activation of defence systems including prostaglandins and stress protein synthesis (signaling agents ), and gene expression Fig. 9. Schematic mechanisms representing key steps in acetylcholine and ethylene in vivo activa� tion and biological action. ing, for example, nicotinic receptor activation and as a consequence ligandgated ion channel activation remain largely unresolved. Hence, non�receptor mechanisms activation and action of biologically active agents, including acetyl� choline, can take place in living systems. Надійшла в редакцію 13.01.2006 р. B.A. Kurchii 42 Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta 1 (2009) Ацетилхолін та етилен: чи подібні їх рецептори й аналогічна біологічна дія? Б.О. Курчій Інститут фізіології рослин і генетики НАН України вул. Васильківська, 31/17, Київ, 03022, Україна Резюме. З точки зору хімії ацетилхолін (АХ) є четвертинна амонієва сполука, біологічна роль якої пов’язана з нейропередачею між нейронами та іншими нейроклітинними з’єднаннями. Раніше нами запропоновано (Kurchii, 1998), а потім і підтверджено (Kurchii, Kurchii, 2000), що АХ за дії фізіологічного розчину і лугу розкладався з утворенням етилену. На жаль, ми не змогли визначити два інших піки, отриманих на газовому хроматографі. У цій статті ми ідентифікували один із двох невідомих піків — окис етилену. Встановлено, що окис етилену виділявся в кількості значно більшій за таку ж кількість етилену в атмосфері повітря або в краплі фізіологічного розчину. З’ясовано, що біологічні ефекти ацетилхоліну можуть бути зумовлені дією окису етилену, який є хімічно актив� ною сполукою, і це є швидка його дія на короткі відстані. Етилен же може мігрувати на далекі відстані, спричиню� ючи сповільнені ефекти, але тільки за умови його активації, бо за нормальних умов (температури і тиску) він є не� активною сполукою і не може вступати в реакції. Проте in vivo етилен може активуватися в реакціях приєднання вільних радикалів. Також, як свідчать здобуті дані, питання про специфічні рецептори АХ залишається дис� кусійним. Ключові слова: ацетилхолін, етилен, окис етилену, вільні радикали, рецептори. 1. Abeles F.B., Morgan P.W., Saltveit M.E. Ethylene in Plant Biology. — San Diego: Academic Press, 1992. — 302 p. 2. Alonso J.M., Ecker J.R. The ethylene pathway: a paradigm for plant hormone signalling and interaction // Science STKE. — 2001: RE1. 3. Aravind L., Ponting C.P. The GAF domain: an evo� lutionary link between diverse phototransducing pro� teins // Trends Biochem. Sci. — 1998. — 22. — P. 458� 459. 4. Barrantes F.J. Transmembrane modulation of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor function // Curr. Opin. Drug Disc. Develop. — 2003. — 6. — P. 620�632. 5. Beyer E.M. Jr. Ethylene action and metabolism // J. Friend, M.J.C. Rhodes, eds. Resent Advance in Biochemistry of Fruits and Vegetables. — New York: Acad. Press, 1981. — P. 107�121. 6. Bleecker A.B. Ethylene perception and signaling: an evolutionary perspective // Trends Plant Sci. — 1999. — 4. — P. 269�274. 7. Bleecker A.B., Kende H. Ethylene: a gaseous signal molecule in plants // Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. — 2000. — 16. — P. 1�40. 8. Blomstrom D.C., Beyer E.M. Plants metabolize ethy� lene to ethylene glycol // Nature. — 1980. — 283. — P. 66�78. 9. Boyd R.T. The molecular biology of neuronal nico� tinic acetylcholine receptors // Crit. Rev. Toxicol. — 1997. — 27. — P. 299�318. 10. Bradley P.B. Introduction to Neuropharmacology. — London � Boston � Singapore � Toronto � Wellington: WRIGHT, 1989. — 623 р. 11. British Nutrition Foundation. Plants: Diet and Health. — Oxford: Blackwell Science, 2003 (details via www.nutrition.org.uk). 12. Bryant M.S., Osterman�Golkar S. Hemoglobin adducts as dosimeters of exposure to DNA�reactive chemicals // Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, NC. CIIT Activities. — 1991. — 11 (10). — P. 1�12. 13. Buben I., Melichercikova V., Novotna N., Svitako� va R. Problems associated with sterilization using ethy� lene oxide. Residues in treated materials // Cent. Eur. J. Public. Health. — 1999. — 7. — P. 197�202. 14. Chang C., Bleecker A.B. Ethylene biology. More than a gas // Plant Physiology. — 2004. — 136. — P. 2895�2899. 15. Chang C., Kwok S.F., Bleecker A.B., Meyero� witz E.M. Arabidopsis ethylene�response gene ETR1: similarity of product to two�component regulators // Science. — 1993. — 262. — P. 539�44. 16. Chang C., Shockey J.A. The ethylene�response pathway: signal perception to gene regulation // Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. — 1999. — 2. — P. 352�358. 17. Changeux J.P., Edelstein S.J. Allosteric receptors after 30 years // Neuron. — 1998. — 21. — P. 959�980. 18. Chen Y�F., Etheridge N., Schaller G.E. Ethylene signal transduction // Ann. Bot. — 2005. — 95. — P. 901� 915. 19. Chesler M. Regulation and modulation of pH in the brain // Physiol. Rev. — 2003. — 83. — P. 1183� 1221. 20. Ciardi J., Klee H. Regulation of ethylene�media� ted responses at the level of the receptor // Ann. Bot. — 2001. — 88. — P. 813�822. 21. Clements J.D. Transmitter timecourse in the synaptic cleft: its role in central synaptic function // Trends Neurosci. — 1996. — 19. — P. 163�171. 22. Cope A.K., ed. Organic reactions. Volume 11. — New York London: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1960. — 342 p. (Russian translation) 23. Corringer P�J., Le NovPre N., Changeux J�P. Nicotinic receptors at the amino acid level // Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. — 2000. — 40. — P. 431�458. References 24. Crespo P., Xu N., Simonds W.F., Gutkind J.S. Ras� dependent activation of MAP kinase pathway mediated by G�protein beta gamma subunits // Nature. — 1994. — 369. — P. 418�420. 25. De Vries L., Zheng B., Fischer T. et al. The regula� tor of G protein signaling family // Annu. Rev. Pharma� col. Toxicol. — 2000. — 40. — P. 235�71. 26. Eglen R.M., Nahorski S.R. The muscarinic M5 receptor: a silent or emerging subtype // Br. J. Pharma� col. — 2000. — 130. — P. 13�21. 27. Ehlert F.J. Pharmacological analysis of the con� tractile role of M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors in smooth muscle // Receptors and Channels. — 2003. — 9. — P. 261�277. 28. Finar I.L. Organic chemistry. Vol. 1. The funda� mental principles. 6th edition. — Sigapore: Longman Singapore Publishers Pty Ltd., 1986. — 965 p. 29. Fiser F., Fiser M. Advanced organic chemistry. — New York London: Reinold Publishing Corporation and Chapman and Hill Ltd., 1964. — 860 p. (Russian transla� tion) 30. Fluck R.A., Jaffe M.J. The acetylcholine system in plants // Curr. Adv. Plant Sci. (E. Smith, ed.). Vol. 5. — Oxford: Science, Engineering, Medical and Data Ltd., 1974. — P. 1�22. 31. Galzi J�L., Changeaux J�P. Neuronal nicotinic receptors: molecular organization and regulation // Neuropharmacology. — 1995. — 34. — P. 563�582. 32. Galzi J.L., Revah F., Bessis A. and Changeux J.P. Functional architecture of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: from electric organ to brain // Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. — 1991. — 31. — P. 37�72. 33. Gong X.�Q., Bisson M.A. Acetylcholine�activated Cl� channel in the Chara tonoplast // J. Membrane Biol. — 2002. — 188. — P. 107�113. 34. Gotti C., Fornasari D., Clementi F. Human neu� ronal nicotinic receptors // Prog. Neurobiol. — 1997. — 53. — P. 199�237. 35. Hartmann E., Gupta R. Acetylcholine as a signal� ing system in plants // Boss W.E., Marre D.J., eds. Second Messengers in Plant Growth and Development. — New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc., 1989. — P. 257�287. 36. Heasley L.E., Senkfor S.I., Winitz S. et al. Hormonal regulation of MAP kinase in cultured rat inner medullary collecting tubule cells // Am. J. Physiol. — 1994. — 267. —P. F366�F373. 37. Hogg R.C., Raggenbass M., Bertrand D. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: from structure to brain function // Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. — 2003. — 147. — P. 1�46. 38. Hucho F., Weice C. The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: 25 years thereafter // Med. Chem. Res. — 2004. — 13. — P. 11�17. 39. Hulme E.C., Birdsal N.J., Buckley N.J. Muscarinic receptor subtypes // Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. — 1990. — 30. — P. 633�673. 40. Jaffe M.J. Evidence for the regulation of phy� tochrome mediated processes in bean roots by the neu� rohumor, acetylcholine // Plant Physiol. — 1970. — 46. — P. 768�777. 41. Jerie P.H., Hall M.A. The identification of ethy� lene oxide as a major metabolite of ethylene in Vicia faba L. // Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B. — 1978. — 200. — P. 87�94. 42. Jones S., Sudweeks S., Yakel J.L. Nicotinic recep� tors in the brain: correlating physiology with function // Trends Neurosci. — 1999. — 22. — P. 555�561. 43. Karlin A. Emerging structure of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors // Nature Rev. Neurosci. — 2002. — 3. — P. 102�114. 44. Kende H. Ethylene biosynthesis // Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. — 1993. — 44. — P. 283�307. 45. Kurchii B.А. What Regulate the Growth Regula� tors? — Kiev: Logos, 1998. — 202 p. 46. Kurchii B.A. Possible reactions of ethylene oxida� tion and formation of its free radicals // Fisiologia i Biokhimiya Kulturnykh Rastenii (Physiology and Biochemistry of Cultivated Plants, Kiev). — 1990. — 22. — P. 445�454 (In Russian). 47. Kurchii B.A. Abscisic acid inhibits oxidation of plant cellular substances caused by ethylene. In Interna� tional Symposium «Intracellular Signalling in Plant and Animal Systems (ISPAS)», 9�14 September, 2001, Kyiv, Ukraine. Programme and Abstracts. — P. 42. (In English) 48. Kurchii B.A., Koydan G.N. What regulate the growth regulators? // Khimiya i Zhizn (Chemistry and Life, Moscow). — 1985. — No. 2. — P. 36�39 (In Russian). 49. Kurchii V.M., Kurchii B.A. Decomposition of acetylcholine with ethylene formation in vitro. Possible free radical mechanism of acetylcholine action // Ukr. Biokhim. Zhurnal (The Ukrainian Biochemical Journal, Kiev). — 2000. — 72. — P. 69�72. (In English) 50. Lanzafame A.A., Christopoulos A., Mitchelson F. Cellular signaling mechanisms for muscarinic acetyl� choline receptors // Receptors and Channels. — 2003. — 9. — P. 241�260. 51. Lewin B. Cenes. Second edition. — New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley and Sons, 1985. — 716 p. 52. Maelicke A. Nicotinic receptors of the vertebrae CNS: Introductory remarks // Progress in Brain Research. — 1996. — 109. — P. 107�110. 53. Medina A., Bodick N., Goldberg A.L et al. Effect of central muscarinic�1 receptor stimulation on blood pres� sure regulation // Hypertention. — 1997. — 29. — P. 828�834. 54. Miesenbock G., De Angelis D.A., Rothman J.E. Visualizing secretion and synaptic transmission with pH�sensitive green fluorescent proteins // Nature (London). — 1998. — 394. — P. 192�195. 55. Miura G.A., Broomfield C.A., Lawson M.A., Wothley E.G. Widespread occurrence of cholinesterase activity in plant leaves // Plant Physiol. — 1982. — 56. — P. 28�32. 56. Miura G.A., Shih T.�M. Cholinergic constituents in plants: Characterization and distribution of acetyl� choline and choline // Physiol. Plant. — 1984. — 61. — P. 417�421. 57. Morrison R.T., Boyd R.N. Organic chemistry. Second edition. — Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc., 1970. — 1132 pp. (Russian translation) 58. O’Donnell P.J., Calvert C., Atzorn R. et al. Ethylene as a signal mediating the wound Response of tomato plants // Science. — 1996. — 274. — P. 1914�1917. 59. O’Donnell P.J., Schmelz E., Block A. et al. Multiple hormones act sequentially to mediate a susceptible tomato pathogen defense response // Plant Physiol. — 2003. — 133. — P. 1181�1189. 60. Ohnishi A., Inoue N., Yamamoto T. et al. Ethylene oxide neuropathy in rats // J. Neurol. Sci. — 1986. — 74. — P. 215�221. 61. Ohnishi A., Inoue N., Yamamoto T. et al. Ethylene oxide induces central�peripheral distal axonal degener� Acetylcholine and ethylene: do they share similar receptors and biological action? 43www.bioorganica.org.ua ation of the lumber primary neurons in rats // Brit. J. Indus. Med. — 1985. — 42. — P. 373�379. 62. Okuno F., Haratake J., Horie A. et al. Effect of chronic exposure of rats to ethylene oxide on the liver // Japan J. Toxicol. — 1989. — 2. — P. 165�167. 63. Rodriguez F.I., Esch J.J., Hall A.E. et al. A copper cofactor for the ethylene receptor ETR1 from Arabidop� sis // Science. — 1999. — 283. — P. 996�998. 64. Schaller G.E., Bleecker A.B. Ethylene�binding sites generated in yeast expressing the Arabidopsis ETR1 gene // Science. — 1995. — 270. — P. 1809�1811. 65. Sargent P.B. The diversity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors // Annu. Rev. Neurosci. — 1993. — 16. — P. 403�443. 66. Schramm N.L., Limbird L.E. Stimulation of mito� gen activated protein kinase by G protein�coupled alpha�2�adrenergic receptors does not require agonist� elicited endocytosis // J. Biol. Chem. — 1999. — 274. — P. 24935�24940. 67. Seger R., Krebs E.G. The MAPK signaling cascade // FASEB J. — 1995. — 9. — P. 726�735. 68. Segerb@ck D. Reaction products in hemoglobin and DNA after in vitro treatment with ethylene oxide and N�(2�hydroxyethyl)�N�nitrosourea // Carcinoge� nesis. — 1990. — 11. — P. 307�12. 69. Smallman B., Maneckjee A. The synthesis of acetylcholine by plants // Biochem. J. — 1981. — 194. — P. 361�365. 70. Snyder S.H., Ferris C.D. Novel neurotransmitters and their neuropsychiatric relevance // Am. J. Psychi� atry. — 2000. — 157. — P. 1738�1751. 71. Tong C.K., Brion L.P., Suarez C., and Chesler M. Interstitial carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity in brain is attributable to membrane�bound CA type IV // J. Neurosci. — 2000. — 20. — P. 8247�8253. 72. Tretyn A. Acetylcholine in plants: Presence, me� tabolism and mechanism of action // Bot. Rev. — 1991. — 57. — P. 34�73. 73. Ulualp K.M., Hamzaoglu I., Ulgen S.K. et al. Is it possible to resterilize disposable laparoscopy trocars in a hospital setting? // Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech. — 2000. — 10. — P. 59�65. 74. Wessler I., Kirkpatrick C.J., Racke K. Non�neu� ronal acetylcholine, a locally acting molecule, widely dis� tributed in biological systems: expression and function in humans // Pharmacol. Theor. — 1998. — 77. — P. 59� 79. 75. Yang S.F., Hoffman N.E. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants // Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. — 1984. — 35. — P. 155�189. B.A. Kurchii 44 Ukrainica Bioorganica Acta 1 (2009)