Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider

The status of VEPP-2M collider is presented. Implementation of Round Colliding Beams (RCB) concept in the new collider VEPP-2M is outlined, potential advantages of RCB over the flat colliding beams are discussed. The main desing parameters and features of this VEPP-2000 collider are reported.

Збережено в:
Бібліографічні деталі
Дата:2001
Автори: Shatunov, Yu.M., Evstigneev, A.V., Ganyushin, D.I., Ivanov, P.M., Koop, I.A., Kuzminykh, V.S., Lysenko, A.P., Mezentsev, N.A., Mityanina, N.V., Nesterenko, I.N., Otboev, A.V., Perevedentsev, E.A., Petrov, V.M., Schwartz, D.B., Shatunov, P.Yu., Skrinsky, A.N., Valishev, A.A., Volkov, V.N.
Формат: Стаття
Мова:English
Опубліковано: Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України 2001
Назва видання:Вопросы атомной науки и техники
Онлайн доступ:http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/79211
Теги: Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
Назва журналу:Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Цитувати:Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider / Yu.M. Shatunov, A.V. Evstigneev, D.I. Ganyushin, P.M. Ivanov, I.A. Koop, V.S. Kuzminykh, A.P. Lysenko, N.A. Mezentsev, N.V. Mityanina, I.N. Nesterenko, A.V. Otboev, E.A. Perevedentsev, V.M. Petrov, D.B. Schwartz, P.Yu. Shatunov, A.N. Skrinsky, A.A. Valishev, V.N. Volkov // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2001. — № 3. — С. 6-8. — Бібліогр.: 6 назв. — англ.

Репозитарії

Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
id irk-123456789-79211
record_format dspace
spelling irk-123456789-792112015-03-30T03:01:56Z Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider Shatunov, Yu.M. Evstigneev, A.V. Ganyushin, D.I. Ivanov, P.M. Koop, I.A. Kuzminykh, V.S. Lysenko, A.P. Mezentsev, N.A. Mityanina, N.V. Nesterenko, I.N. Otboev, A.V. Perevedentsev, E.A. Petrov, V.M. Schwartz, D.B. Shatunov, P.Yu. Skrinsky, A.N. Valishev, A.A. Volkov, V.N. The status of VEPP-2M collider is presented. Implementation of Round Colliding Beams (RCB) concept in the new collider VEPP-2M is outlined, potential advantages of RCB over the flat colliding beams are discussed. The main desing parameters and features of this VEPP-2000 collider are reported. 2001 Article Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider / Yu.M. Shatunov, A.V. Evstigneev, D.I. Ganyushin, P.M. Ivanov, I.A. Koop, V.S. Kuzminykh, A.P. Lysenko, N.A. Mezentsev, N.V. Mityanina, I.N. Nesterenko, A.V. Otboev, E.A. Perevedentsev, V.M. Petrov, D.B. Schwartz, P.Yu. Shatunov, A.N. Skrinsky, A.A. Valishev, V.N. Volkov // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2001. — № 3. — С. 6-8. — Бібліогр.: 6 назв. — англ. 1562-6016 PACS number: 29.17.+w http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/79211 en Вопросы атомной науки и техники Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
institution Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
collection DSpace DC
language English
description The status of VEPP-2M collider is presented. Implementation of Round Colliding Beams (RCB) concept in the new collider VEPP-2M is outlined, potential advantages of RCB over the flat colliding beams are discussed. The main desing parameters and features of this VEPP-2000 collider are reported.
format Article
author Shatunov, Yu.M.
Evstigneev, A.V.
Ganyushin, D.I.
Ivanov, P.M.
Koop, I.A.
Kuzminykh, V.S.
Lysenko, A.P.
Mezentsev, N.A.
Mityanina, N.V.
Nesterenko, I.N.
Otboev, A.V.
Perevedentsev, E.A.
Petrov, V.M.
Schwartz, D.B.
Shatunov, P.Yu.
Skrinsky, A.N.
Valishev, A.A.
Volkov, V.N.
spellingShingle Shatunov, Yu.M.
Evstigneev, A.V.
Ganyushin, D.I.
Ivanov, P.M.
Koop, I.A.
Kuzminykh, V.S.
Lysenko, A.P.
Mezentsev, N.A.
Mityanina, N.V.
Nesterenko, I.N.
Otboev, A.V.
Perevedentsev, E.A.
Petrov, V.M.
Schwartz, D.B.
Shatunov, P.Yu.
Skrinsky, A.N.
Valishev, A.A.
Volkov, V.N.
Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider
Вопросы атомной науки и техники
author_facet Shatunov, Yu.M.
Evstigneev, A.V.
Ganyushin, D.I.
Ivanov, P.M.
Koop, I.A.
Kuzminykh, V.S.
Lysenko, A.P.
Mezentsev, N.A.
Mityanina, N.V.
Nesterenko, I.N.
Otboev, A.V.
Perevedentsev, E.A.
Petrov, V.M.
Schwartz, D.B.
Shatunov, P.Yu.
Skrinsky, A.N.
Valishev, A.A.
Volkov, V.N.
author_sort Shatunov, Yu.M.
title Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider
title_short Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider
title_full Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider
title_fullStr Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider
title_full_unstemmed Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider
title_sort project of vepp-2000 electron-positron collider
publisher Національний науковий центр «Харківський фізико-технічний інститут» НАН України
publishDate 2001
url http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/79211
citation_txt Project of VEPP-2000 electron-positron collider / Yu.M. Shatunov, A.V. Evstigneev, D.I. Ganyushin, P.M. Ivanov, I.A. Koop, V.S. Kuzminykh, A.P. Lysenko, N.A. Mezentsev, N.V. Mityanina, I.N. Nesterenko, A.V. Otboev, E.A. Perevedentsev, V.M. Petrov, D.B. Schwartz, P.Yu. Shatunov, A.N. Skrinsky, A.A. Valishev, V.N. Volkov // Вопросы атомной науки и техники. — 2001. — № 3. — С. 6-8. — Бібліогр.: 6 назв. — англ.
series Вопросы атомной науки и техники
work_keys_str_mv AT shatunovyum projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT evstigneevav projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT ganyushindi projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT ivanovpm projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT koopia projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT kuzminykhvs projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT lysenkoap projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT mezentsevna projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT mityaninanv projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT nesterenkoin projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT otboevav projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT perevedentsevea projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT petrovvm projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT schwartzdb projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT shatunovpyu projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT skrinskyan projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT valishevaa projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
AT volkovvn projectofvepp2000electronpositroncollider
first_indexed 2025-07-06T03:16:02Z
last_indexed 2025-07-06T03:16:02Z
_version_ 1836865827768369152
fulltext PROJECT OF VEPP-2000 ELECTRON-POSITRON COLLIDER Yu.M. Shatunov, A.V. Evstigneev, D.I. Ganyushin, P.M. Ivanov, I.A. Koop, V.S. Kuzminykh, A.P. Lysenko, N.A. Mezentsev, N.V. Mityanina, I.N. Nesterenko, A.V. Otboev, E.A. Perevedentsev, V.M. Petrov, D.B. Schwartz, P.Yu. Shatunov, A.N. Skrinsky, A.A. Valishev, V.N. Volkov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia The status of VEPP-2M collider is presented. Implementation of Round Colliding Beams (RCB) concept in the new collider VEPP-2000 is outlined, potential advantages of RCB over the flat colliding beams are discussed. The main design parameters and features of this VEPP-2000 collider are reported. PACS numbers: 29.17.+w 1 STATUS OF VEPP-2M AND MOTIVA- TION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW COLLIDER Since the end of 1992 the e e+ − collider VEPP-2M in Novosibirsk has been successfully running in the c.m. energy range from the threshold of hadron production up to 1.4 GeV. Since 1984 VEPP-2M is operating with the five-pole superconducting wiggler with the maxi- mum field 8B T= , which increases the beam emit- tance by a factor of 3. The integrated luminosity of about 50 pb-1 as collected with two modern detectors SND [1] and CMD-2[2] allowing precise measurements of most of the hadronic channels of e e+ − annihilation. Together with 24 pb-1 collected at VEPP-2M in the pre- vious generation of experiments in 1974–1987, this in- tegrated luminosity is more than one order of magnitude higher than about 6 pb-1 accumulated by various experi- mental groups in Frascati and Orsay in the c.m. energy range from 1.4 to 2 GeV. Thus, there is a serious energy gap between the maximum energy attainable at VEPP-2M and 2 GeV in which existing data on e e+ − annihilation into hadrons are rather imprecise. Accurate measurements of hadronic cross sections in this energy range are crucial for better understanding of many phe- nomena in high energy physics. A recent decision to upgrade the VEPP-2M complex by replacing the existing collider with a new one, in or- der to improve the luminosity and at the same time in- crease the maximum attainable energy up to 2 GeV, will significantly broaden the potential of experiments per- formed at the collider. Following modern trends, the new project was named VEPP-2000. 2 ROUND COLLIDING BEAMS During the last decade at BINP the concept of Round Colliding Beams (RCB) [3] was proposed. The evident advantage of round colliding beams is that with the fixed particle density, the tune shift from the opposite bunch becomes twice as small as the tune shift in the case of flat colliding beams. Besides, the lin- ear beam-beam tune shift in the round beams becomes independent on the longitudinal position in the bunch, thereby weakening the action of synchro-betatron reso- nances. The main feature of the RCB is rotational symmetry of the kick from the round opposite beam; complement- ed with the X-Z symmetry of the betatron transfer ma- trix between the collisions, it results in conservation of particle angular momentum. Thus, the transverse mo- tion becomes equivalent to a one-dimensional (1D) mo- tion. Resulting elimination of all the betatron coupling resonances is of crucial importance, since they are be- lieved to cause the beam lifetime degradation and blow- up. The above arguments in favour of RCB have been checked out by the computer simulations of the beam- beam effects in RCB option [4]. The simulations have also demonstrated stability of RCB against the “flip- flop” effect, similarly to conclusions from simple flip- flop models [5]. 3 VEPP-2000 PROJECT 3.1 Collider Optics Our approach to the new collider optics is based on the idea of round colliding beams [3]. The main princi- ples of round beam mode will be satisfied by placing SC solenoids in two Interaction Regions equipped with existing particle detectors (Fig. 1). Fig. 1. The VEPP-2000 collider layout. The superconducting solenoids will provide equal *β -functions and rotate by 2/π the planes of betatron oscillations. This will result in alternation of vertical and horizontal orientations of the planar betatron eigen- modes over each half-turn, which in turn will lead to their equal tunes and emittances. The optical functions of the round beam lattice are presented in Fig. 2. ВОПРОСЫ АТОМНОЙ НАУКИ И ТЕХНИКИ. 2001. №3. Серия: Ядерно-физические исследования (38), с. 6-8. 6 Fig. 2. Half period lattice functions. S=0 corre- sponds to IP. An essential advantage of the found optics is zero dispersion in the IRs, RF cavity, and injection straight sections. The chosen optics has another very useful feature. Variation of the focusing strength of the solenoids changes *β and the beam emittance in inverse propor- tion, at a fixed energy. Changing the energy, we can squeeze *β , conserving the maximum beam size at the solenoids, thus giving a possibility to tune optics for better performance. Apparently, this feature provides the luminosity scaling at lower energies approximately as 2γ (instead of 4γ for the option with fixed *β ). The main parameters of the new collider are given in Table 1. 3.2 Injection The injection of beams into the storage ring is planned to be done in the horizontal plane into the long drift opposite to the RF cavity. The inflector plates will be placed on the inner side of the vacuum chamber in the bending magnets at the ends of the drift. The advan- tage of such a scheme is independence of the injected beam trajectory on the solenoids field. This gives us an opportunity to test different options of optics: usual round beams, “Mobius”, and flat beams with zero rota- tion of the betatron oscillation plane. The BEP booster is capable of production beams with the energy of up to 900 MeV. Thus, operation at lower energies will be continuous, with injection of the beam at the experiment energy. In the range from 900 MeV to 1 GeV the energy ranging from 900 MeV to the experiment energy is required. 3.3 Chromaticity correction The chromaticity correction is performed by the sex- tupole families Sx and Sz, placed near the quadrupoles of triplets, where the dispersion function is non-zero. Another variant discussed implies a special correction of pole profiles of the horizontally focusing quadrupoles in the triplets. Table 1. Main parameters of the collider at E=900 MeV Circumference, m C 24.388 RF frequency, MHz 0f 172.0 RF voltage, kV V 100 RF harmonic number q 14 Momentum compaction α 0.036 Synchrotrone tune sν 0.003 Emittances, cm ⋅ rad xε zε 52.2 10−⋅ 52.2 10−⋅ Energy loss/turn, keV 0E∆ 41.5 Dimensionless damping decrements zδ xδ sδ 52.3 10−⋅ 52.3 10−⋅ 54.6 10−⋅ Energy spread εσ 46.4 10−⋅ xβ at IP, cm zβ at IP, cm xβ zβ 6.3 6.3 Betatron tunes ,x zν ν 4.1, 2.1 Particles/bunch ,e e− + 111.0 10⋅ Bunches/beam 1 Tune shifts xξ zξ 0.075 0.075 Luminosity/IP, cm-2 ⋅ s-1 maxL 321.0 10−⋅ The scheme with only two sextupole families leaves the problem of dynamical aperture unresolved, this forces us to use an additional sextupole correction fami- ly to control the sextupole perturbation harmonics. These sextupoles are placed in dispersion-free regions: in the injection and RF cavity drifts, between the bend- ing magnets and quadrupoles. Application of these cor- rectors yields dynamical aperture of about σ14 (17mm inside the solenoid) which is still less than mechanical aperture. So, search for a better solution is in progress. 4 TECHNICAL FEATURES 4.1 Superconducting Solenoids Focusing in the two interaction regions is performed by SC solenoids, installed symmetrically with respect to the IPs. Each solenoidal block consists of a main solenoid which is longitudinally divided into two parts, and a compensating solenoid with reverse field to adjust longitudinal field integral and focussing. Such a scheme gives an additional possibility to control the *β value by feeding only one half of the main solenoid at lower energies. The solenoid coil is divided into three sections: in- ner section has thickness 30 mm and is made of SnNb3 wire 1.23 mm in diameter (50% Cu + 50% SnNb3 ); middle section has thickness 20 mm and is wound with a NbTi wire 1.2 mm in diameter (48%Cu +52% NbTi ) and outer layer has thickness of 10 mm, ВОПРОСЫ АТОМНОЙ НАУКИ И ТЕХНИКИ. 2001. №3. Серия: Ядерно-физические исследования (38), с. 7-8. 7 made of NbTi wire 0.85 mm in diameter (48% Cu +52% NbTi ). To feed this three-section coil we plan to use two power supply units. Connection scheme implies that the current in the outer section is the sum of cur- rents in the inner ones. The distribution of currents in the sections is: inner section - 145 A, intermediate sec- tion - 167 A, outer section - 312 A. The peak magnetic field is 12.1 T. Magnetic flux is closed by the iron return yoke lo- cated together with all the coils in a common LHe cryo- stat. Aperture of the coil is 50.0 mm. The inner tube of the helium vessel is a part of the collider vacuum cham- ber. A nitrogen vapour cooled liner is envisaged to pro- tect the surface of the helium cryostat from heating by synchrotron radiation. 4.2 Dipole Magnets, Quadrupoles and Sextupoles Constrained VEPP-2M complex area restricts the machine dimensions leading to necessity of using strong dipole magnets. To achieve the beam energy of 1 GeV guiding field of 2.4 T is required. The design of the BEP booster ring magnet [6] which works at this field level is intended to be used. Magnet bending radius is 1400 mm, the gap is 40 mm. Number of coil turns is 10. At maximum current 9.5 kA the power consumption is 100 kW/magnet. New lattice will include 5 families of quadrupoles with maximum gradient of 50 T/m and 3 families of sextupoles. Inscribed circle diameter of quadrupoles and sextupoles is 40 mm. Chromaticity correction sex- tupoles (two families) are located between quadrupoles of the triplets. Similar 5 kW power supply units will be used to feed the coils in the quadrupole magnets and in the sextupoles. All other low-current coils of the closed orbit steering and gradient correction coils in the quadrupole magnets will be powered using existing power supplies. 4.3 RF System Beam revolution frequency is 12.292 MHz. The ac- celerating RF frequency was chosen at 14-th revolution frequency harmonic i.e. 172 MHz. With accelerating voltage of 100 kV the bunch length is about σ = 3 cm at the energy of 1 GeV. Energy loss per turn is 64 keV, and with colliding beam currents of 1.02 × A the pow- er delivered to the beams is 12.8 kW. The so-called sin- gle-mode cavity is proposed to be used to ease suppres- sion of coherent instabilities, see Fig. 3. Two coaxial damping loads are foreseen to absorb the energy from high-order modes excitation. The fundamental mode is isolated from the upper load by the tunable choke. Fig. 3. Cross-section of the cavity. The locations of HOM. 4.4 Vacuum System High vacuum pumping of the experimantal straight sections will be performed by the internal tube of the LHe vessel. For this purpose it is planned to make slits in the nitrogen cooled liner which protects the LHe sur- face from heating by the synchrotron radiation. In the rest regions combined ion-pumping and getter pumping are intended to be used. Average vacuum in the ring at the working currents should be higher than 810− torr. 5 CONCLUSION − Experimental testing of RCB at VEPP-2000 should verify predictions on extremely high attainable space charge parameters for the round beams. − The machine tune-up procedures will be worked out for implementation of such a non-conventional optics. − The efforts and expenses needed to build VEPP-2000 are moderate and so this work can be carried out within the next year. REFERENCES 1. M.N.Achasov et al., Preprint BudkerINP 98-65, Novosibirsk, 1998. 2. R.R.Akhmetshin et al., Preprint BudkerINP 99-11, Novosibirsk, 1999. 3. V.V.Danilov et al., “The Concept of Round Collid- ing Beams” // Proc. EPAC'96, Barcelona, 1996, p.1149. 4. A.N.Filippov et al.// Proc. 15th Int. Conf. High En- ergy Accelerators, Hamburg (Germany), 1992, p.1145. 5. A.V.Otboyev and E.A.Perevedentsev // Proc. 1999 PAC, New York (1999). 6. V.V.Anashin et al., Preprint BudkerINP 84-114, Novosibirsk, 1984. ВОПРОСЫ АТОМНОЙ НАУКИ И ТЕХНИКИ. 2001. №3. Серия: Ядерно-физические исследования (38), с. 8-8 8