Приватизация в Украине как социально-экономический процесс: объективные показатели и субъективные оценки
The article deals with the dynamics of objective indices and subjective estimations of privatization in Ukraine. The author emphasizes the importance of a broader interpretation of the “privatization” notion that would allow to consider the above mentioned phenomenon as a social reinstitutionalizat...
Gespeichert in:
| Datum: | 2006 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | Russian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Iнститут соціології НАН України
2006
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг |
| Online Zugang: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/90305 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
| Zitieren: | Приватизация в Украине как социально-экономический процесс: объективные показатели и субъективные оценки / В. Резник // Социология: теория, методы, маркетинг. — 2006. — № 2. — С. 66–89. — Бібліогр.: 23 назв. — рос. |
Institution
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine| Zusammenfassung: | The article deals with the dynamics of objective indices and subjective estimations of
privatization in Ukraine. The author emphasizes the importance of a broader interpretation of the “privatization” notion that would allow to consider the above mentioned phenomenon as a social reinstitutionalization of private ownership, private enterprise,
and labor market. The abovementioned reinstitutionalization is to examine on the base
of structure ownership and employment indices in their dynamics. Such an analysis
allows to conclude that the market economy institutions are renewed as well as
parallelism and common tendencies in their forming exist. Moreover, the author
adduces opinions on privatization processes expressed by the Ukrainian citizens as
well as expert estimations of private ownership. All this gives grounds for assuming
that social delegitimization of the privatization process is not necessarily the case for
a similar delegitimization of the private ownership institution on the whole. |
|---|