Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds
Electron-enhanced reactions in II-VI compounds are shown to be caused by the presence of some mobile defects which diffusion is not enhanced under excitation. At the same time, electron-enhanced diffusion can be imitated in these reactions due to carrier trapping by deep centers that do or even do n...
Збережено в:
Дата: | 1999 |
---|---|
Автори: | , , , , |
Формат: | Стаття |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
Інститут фізики напівпровідників імені В.Є. Лашкарьова НАН України
1999
|
Назва видання: | Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics |
Онлайн доступ: | http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/117932 |
Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Назва журналу: | Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
Цитувати: | Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds / N.E. Korsunskaya, I.V. Markevich, B.R. Dzhumaev, L.V. Borkovskaya, M.K. Sheinkman // Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. — 1999. — Т. 2, № 1. — С. 4246-ХХ. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ. |
Репозитарії
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraineid |
irk-123456789-117932 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
irk-123456789-1179322017-05-28T03:03:09Z Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds Korsunskaya, N. E. Markevich, I. V. Dzhumaev, B. R. Borkovskaya, L. V. Sheinkman, M. K. Electron-enhanced reactions in II-VI compounds are shown to be caused by the presence of some mobile defects which diffusion is not enhanced under excitation. At the same time, electron-enhanced diffusion can be imitated in these reactions due to carrier trapping by deep centers that do or even do not take part in the reaction. To elucidate the real defect reaction mechanism a detailed study is required in every case. For this purpose, a method of mobile defect detection and their diffusion characteristic direct investigation has been elaborated. 1999 Article Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds / N.E. Korsunskaya, I.V. Markevich, B.R. Dzhumaev, L.V. Borkovskaya, M.K. Sheinkman // Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. — 1999. — Т. 2, № 1. — С. 4246-ХХ. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ. 1560-8034 PACS 61.72.Ji, 61.72.Yx, 72.40.+w, 72.80.Ey, 78.55.Et http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/117932 en Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics Інститут фізики напівпровідників імені В.Є. Лашкарьова НАН України |
institution |
Digital Library of Periodicals of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine |
collection |
DSpace DC |
language |
English |
description |
Electron-enhanced reactions in II-VI compounds are shown to be caused by the presence of some mobile defects which diffusion is not enhanced under excitation. At the same time, electron-enhanced diffusion can be imitated in these reactions due to carrier trapping by deep centers that do or even do not take part in the reaction. To elucidate the real defect reaction mechanism a detailed study is required in every case. For this purpose, a method of mobile defect detection and their diffusion characteristic direct investigation has been elaborated. |
format |
Article |
author |
Korsunskaya, N. E. Markevich, I. V. Dzhumaev, B. R. Borkovskaya, L. V. Sheinkman, M. K. |
spellingShingle |
Korsunskaya, N. E. Markevich, I. V. Dzhumaev, B. R. Borkovskaya, L. V. Sheinkman, M. K. Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics |
author_facet |
Korsunskaya, N. E. Markevich, I. V. Dzhumaev, B. R. Borkovskaya, L. V. Sheinkman, M. K. |
author_sort |
Korsunskaya, N. E. |
title |
Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds |
title_short |
Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds |
title_full |
Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds |
title_fullStr |
Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds |
title_full_unstemmed |
Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds |
title_sort |
electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in ii-vi compounds |
publisher |
Інститут фізики напівпровідників імені В.Є. Лашкарьова НАН України |
publishDate |
1999 |
url |
http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/117932 |
citation_txt |
Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds / N.E. Korsunskaya, I.V. Markevich, B.R. Dzhumaev, L.V. Borkovskaya, M.K. Sheinkman // Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. — 1999. — Т. 2, № 1. — С. 4246-ХХ. — Бібліогр.: 12 назв. — англ. |
series |
Semiconductor Physics Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT korsunskayane electronenhancedreactionsresponsibleforphotoluminescencespectrumchangeiniivicompounds AT markevichiv electronenhancedreactionsresponsibleforphotoluminescencespectrumchangeiniivicompounds AT dzhumaevbr electronenhancedreactionsresponsibleforphotoluminescencespectrumchangeiniivicompounds AT borkovskayalv electronenhancedreactionsresponsibleforphotoluminescencespectrumchangeiniivicompounds AT sheinkmanmk electronenhancedreactionsresponsibleforphotoluminescencespectrumchangeiniivicompounds |
first_indexed |
2025-07-08T13:02:23Z |
last_indexed |
2025-07-08T13:02:23Z |
_version_ |
1837083914124918784 |
fulltext |
4 2 © 1999, Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Semiconductor Physics, Quantum Electronics & Optoelectronics. 1999. V. 2, N 1. P. 42-46.
1. Introduction
Processes of two types, namely, dislocation multiplica-
tion and electronically enhanced point defect reactions
are known to be responsible for II-VI compound light
emitting device degradation. The processes connected
with dislocation motion and multiplication are well in-
vestigated. At the same time, there is a little information
about defect reactions in light emitting devices based on
II-VI compound crystals and layers. This state of affairs
may be due to the difficulty of required information ex-
traction under finished device investigation. Such infor-
mation can be obtained more easily under investigation
of materials used for device preparation.
This report deals with mechanisms of point defect re-
actions in CdS, CdSe, CdSSe crystals which are used as
working elements of pulsed electron-beam-pumped lasers
[1]. A number of defect reactions resulting in some elec-
tric, photoelectric and optical characteristic changes were
found by us in these crystals earlier [2]. These reactions
were proved to be processes of rearrangement of pre-ex-
PACS 61.72.Ji, 61.72.Yx, 72.40.+w, 72.80.Ey, 78.55.Et
Electron-enhanced reactions responsible for
photoluminescence spectrum change in II-VI compounds
N. E. Korsunskaya, I. V. Markevich, B. R. Dzhumaev**, L. V. Borkovskaya, M. K. Sheinkman*
Institute of Semiconductor Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, 252028, Ukraine,
tel: (044) 265-72-34, fax: (044) 265-83-44, e-mail: kors@lumin.semicond.kiev.ua;
*tel: (044) 265-63-40, *Fax: (044) 265-63-40, *e-mail: moishe@photel.semicond.kiev.ua.
**Turkmen Polytechnic Institute, Ashgabat, 744025, Turkmenistan
Abstract. Electron-enhanced reactions in II-VI compounds are shown to be caused by the presence
of some mobile defects which diffusion is not enhanced under excitation. At the same time, elec-
tron-enhanced diffusion can be imitated in these reactions due to carrier trapping by deep centers
that do or even do not take part in the reaction. To elucidate the real defect reaction mechanism a
detailed study is required in every case. For this purpose, a method of mobile defect detection and
their diffusion characteristic direct investigation has been elaborated.
Keywords: electron-enhanced reactions; II-VI compounds; mobile defects.
Paper received 25.12.98; revised manuscript received 08.04.99; accepted for publication 19.04.99.
isted defects and were shown to be reversible [2]. The
activation energies of reaction process, E
R
, and initial
state restoration one, E
I
therm , were found to be 0.15÷0.35
and 0.4÷1.2 eV ranges, respectively, the relation E
R
<
< E
I
therm being observed for each reaction [2].
As a rule, point defect rearrangements both in the
presence and absence of excitation are supposed to be
controlled by defect diffusion. So, the relation E
R
<
< E
I
therm is usually explained by reduction of defect diffu-
sion activation energy under excitation (electron-en-
hanced diffusion) [3-5], partially, by phonon-kick mech-
anism [5]. In the latter case the equality E
eq
= E
ex
+ E
t
takes place, where E
ex
and E
eq
are the defect rearrange-
ment activation energies under excitation and equilibri-
um conditions, respectively, E
t
is the energy depth of the
defect that takes part in the reaction [5]. However, our
investigations showed that the same equality can take
place when excitation does not affect defect diffusion.
43SQO, 2(1), 1999
N. E. Korsunskaya et al.: Electron-enhanced reactions responsible ...
2. Results and discussion
Photoluminescence (PL), photocurrent (PC), thermally
stimulated current (TSC) and EPR spectra were mea-
sured in CdS, CdSe and CdS
x
Se
1-x crystals. PL was ex-
cited with 0.365 µm mercury lamp line. The results of
reaction mechanism investigations for two different de-
fect reactions are adduced below.
2.1. Reaction resulting in degradation of PL in-
tensity and photosensitivity.
This reaction occurs in �pure� and Cu-doped CdS, CdSe
crystals in 300÷400 K temperature range under illumi-
nation with visible light from the regions of photocur-
rent maxima. It results in dramatic decrease of crystal
photosensitivity and extrinsic PL intensity [6]. After heat-
ing up to 450 K and subsequent cooling in the dark the
initial state restores. At T < 300 K, when the reaction is
�frozen�, the sample characteristics can be investigat-
ed both in the initial state and after reaction carrying
out. PL spectra at 80 K in these two states for CdS:Cu
crystal are shown in Fig. 1.
It was found from TSC investigations that the density
of shallow electron traps T1 (E
1
= E
C
- 0.03 eV) decreased
and the density of deep electron traps T2 (E
2
= E
C
- 0.9 eV)
increased as a result of reaction (Fig. 2, curves 1,2). It
was proved that T2 center appearance resulted from re-
arrangement of T1 centers, probably, due to their asso-
ciation [6]. As EPR investigations showed, T1 centers
were hydrogenlike donors [7]. It was found that T2 de-
struction and T1 reappearance under heating in the dark
occurred in fact simultaneously with T2 thermal ioniza-
tion. The activation energies of both the reaction and
initial state restoration were obtained from process rate
temperature dependencies by the method described in [8].
These values were found to be equal to in 0.35 and 1.25
eV, respectively. Therefore, the equation E
I
therm = E
R
+ E
2
takes place.
Since the initial state restoration occurs simultaneous-
ly with T2 thermal ionization one may suppose that it is
the latter which controls restoration process. To verify
this supposition we tried to ionize T2 optically. For this
purpose the sample after reaction carrying out had been
irradiated with IR-light at 80 K and than TSC spectrum
was measured. An effective ionization of T2 by λ =
= 0.8÷1.1 µm IR light was observed. It was also found
that such irradiation enhanced initial state restoration
process and decreased its activation energy down to
0.35 eV. Therefore, initial state restoration process can
be also the photo-enhanced one, moreover, its activation
energy in this case E
I
opt, is equal to E
R
.
One can see also that E
I
therm = E
I
opt + E
2
, i.e. the equal-
ity E
eq
= E
ex
+ E
t
is valid here. Nominally, such equality
allows to assume that the phonon-kick mechanism [5] or
the mechanism of diffusion enhancement caused by cen-
ter transition into excited state [9] takes place in the pro-
cess under consideration. However, proceeding from re-
ceived results one can conclude that the investigated re-
action as well as initial state restoration after T2 optical
ionization is controlled by the T1-center thermal diffu-
sion, while E
I
therm includes E
2 value. Let us show that in
this case above mentioned equality really can be valid.
The kinetics of T2-center destruction is described by
the system of equations:
Fig. 1. Luminescence spectra of CdS:Cu crystal in initial state
(1) and after reaction (2), T = 80 K.
Fig. 2. TSC spectra of CdS:Cu crystal: (1) in the initial state;
(2) after degradation reaction; (3,4) after electric field applica-
tion at 350 K during 10 min, when the investigated region is
the cathode (3) and the anode (4).
N. E. Korsunskaya et al.: Electron-enhanced reactions responsible ...
4 4 SQO, 2(1), 1999
dN
dt
Bp
2
2= − ,
dp
dt
A N p Cp Bp2
2 2 2 2( )= − − − − ,
where N
2
is the T2-center density, p
2
is the hole density
on T2-centers, B B e0
E / kTdif= − is the probability of T2-
center diffusional dissociation, E
dif is the T1 center dif-
fusion activation energy, A NC
E / kTe T2= −νS is the prob-
ability of thermal excitation of electrons from T2-cen-
ters to the c-band (v � thermal velocity of electron, S �
cross-section of electron capture by T2-center, N
C
� state
density in the c-band), and C = nvS is the probability of
electron retrapping (n � free electron density).
Since reaching the generation-recombination equi-
librium in the system is a much faster process than T2-
center destruction, it may be supposed that n = const.
The solution of this system of equations may be repre-
sented as
N C e C e2 1
t /
2
t / 1 2= +− −τ τ ,
where C
1
, C
2
are integration constants, and
1
t
(A B C) (A B C) 4AB
21,2
=
+ + ± + + −
.
The activation energy of T2-center destruction is de-
termined by the slope of the straight line τ
1,2
(1/T). De-
pending on the correlation of A, B and C, E
I
may take
different values from E
dif
up to E
2
+E
dif
.
If retrapping is available and the probability of empty
T2-center destruction is much less than the probability of
T2-center thermal ionization (B << A) in the tempera-
ture range where p
2
<< N
2
and, therefore, p
2
∼ A, the
concentration of dissociated centers ∆N
2 is proportional
to B p e e2
E / kT E / kT2 dif⋅ ∼ ⋅− − and E
I
= E
2
+ E
dif
.
Hence, phonon-kick mechanism [5] or excited state
mechanism [9] can be imitated when a reaction under ex-
citation is controlled by defect thermal diffusion. To elu-
cidate the real defect reaction mechanism a method using
the mobile defect drift in external electric field was elabo-
rated [10]. It was shown that investigation of PC and PL
characteristic changes in sample areas near electrodes
after electric field (E = 102 ÷ 103 V/cm) application al-
lows to detect mobile defects and to identify their nature
[10,11]. Defect drift activation energy which is equal to
defect diffusion activation energy was obtained from the
temperature dependence of drift rate [10].
Application of electric field to investigated crystals
at T = 350÷400 K was found to result in accumulation
of T1 centers near the cathode (Fig. 2, curve 3), which
was in accordance with their donor nature [7]. This ef-
fect was accompanied by the λ = 4869.5 A
o
bound exci-
ton line intensity increase. This line is known to be caused
by radiative annihilation of exciton bound to shallow
donor Cd
i [11]. Thus, shallow donors that participate in
reaction are Cd
i
atoms. This donor diffusion activation
energy, E
dif
, was found to be independent on nonequi-
librium carrier density (intensity of the light) and equal
to 0.4 eV. Hence, E
dif
≈ E
R
, i.e., the reaction is really con-
trolled by T1 thermal diffusion.
Defect rearrangement activation energy can also be
influenced by carrier trapping at centers that do not take
part in defect reaction at all. This effect takes place, for
instance, in donor-acceptor pair (DAP) dissociation reac-
tion which is considered below.
2.2. Photosensitizing reaction in CdS
x
Se
1-x
crystals.
As it was shown earlier [2], in CdS and CdS
x
Se
1-x
crystals
dissociation of DAPs consisting of shallow donors (E
d
=
= E
C
- 0.03 eV) and deep acceptors (E
a
= E
C
- 1.2 eV)
occurred under intrinsic band illumination in the
150÷300 K temperature range. The reaction results in the
increase of PC and intensity of λ = 1.03 µm PL band
which is due to radiative recombination of free electrons
at the deep acceptor. Since this acceptor is the center of
photosensitivity (r-center [12]), the dissociation reaction
leads to the increase of PC both in the intrinsic maxi-
mum I
ph
int and in the extrinsic one I
ph
ex (Fig. 3, curves
1,2). The latter is due to excitation of electrons from r-
centers to the c-band [12]. Heating the sample to 400 K
Fig. 3. Photocurrent spectra of type 2 crystal at 80 K after:
cooling in the dark from 400 K (1); cooling under intrinsic
band illumination from 300 K (2) and followed by heating
in the dark (3) to 220 (x), 230 (•), 235 (∇) and 280 K(5); cool-
ing under intrinsic band illumination from 300 K and irradia-
tion with IR-light at 80 K followed by heating in the dark to
230 K (4).
45SQO, 2(1), 1999
N. E. Korsunskaya et al.: Electron-enhanced reactions responsible ...
and subsequent cooling in the dark results in restora-
tion of the initial state. In order to obtain the activation
energies of the dissociation and association processes
both the kinetics of r-center density (N
r
) increase under
illumination and N
r
decrease in the dark were investi-
gated at different T. N
r
was estimated from I
ph
ex value.
Two types of CdS
x
Se
1-x
crystals were found. For both
types DAP dissociation activation energy was shown to
be equal to 0.17 eV. In crystals with 0 < x ≤ 0.5 (type 1)
DAP association in the dark was found to occur in the
same temperature range (200 ÷ 230 K) as their dissocia-
tion under illumination.
At the same time, in crystals with 0.5 < x ≤1 (type 2),
heating to 200 ÷ 235 K resulted in a very small N
r
de-
crease and only near 280 K did an abrupt photocurrent
drop take place (Fig. 3). The curves ∆I
ph
ex/I
ph
ex (max) =
= f(∆t) (∆t is time interval that the sample was hold for
in dark) proved to be exponential for crystals of both
types and therefore, the investigated process was a reac-
tion of the first order. From the slope of ln1/τ
a
= f(1/T)
plot (τ
a
was time constant) the activation energies of the
association process E
eq
= 0.17 ± 0.05 eV for type 1 crys-
tals and E
eq
∼ 0.8 eV for type 2 crystals were obtained
(Fig. 4). So, in type 1 crystals the association activation
energy coincides with the activation energy of dis-
sociation, i.e. E
eq
= E
ex
in this case. This means, to all
appearances, that both processes are controlled by dif-
fusion of the same defect, with a diffusion activation en-
ergy that is not affected by excitation.
In type 2 crystals the relation E
eq
> E
ex
holds. The
TSC investigation showed that in type 2 crystals (un-
like in type 1 ones) deep electron traps were present,
which caused a TSC peak at 300 K. The trap ionization
energy E
t
= 0.8 eV obtained from the TSC curve coin-
cides rather well with the DAP association energy
(Fig. 4). It may be supposed, therefore, that the DAP
Fig. 4. The association reaction kinetics for type 1 crystal (1)
and type 2 crystal (2). TSC for type 2 crystal in the 240÷280 K
range (3).
association kinetics in type 2 crystals is controlled by a
trap emptying process. To verify this supposition, the
following experiment was carried out. A sample of type
2 crystal was first cooled from 300 to 80 K under intrin-
sic illumination. The intrinsic light was then switched
off and the sample was illuminated with IR light to ion-
ize deep traps and consequently to recharge the r-cen-
ters. Emptying traps was controlled by TSC measure-
ments. It was found that after IR illumination heating
to 220 ÷ 230 K resulted in a considerable decrease of N
r
(Fig. 3). At the same time IR light did not affect the as-
sociation process in type 1 crystals.
So, illumination-enhanced diffusion does not take
place in the investigated process. The relation E
eq
> E
ex
in
this case occurs because the acceptor can recharge only
after deep electron trap ionization. In principle, donor
itself can play the role of trapping center. Let us show that
in this case equality E
eq
= E
ex
+ E
dif can take place.
A set of equations which describes the association re-
action, i.e., the process of the decrease of isolated donor
density, is:
dN
dt
BN Nd
d
+
a
-= − ,
dN
dt
BN N A(N N ) CNd
+
d
+
a
-
d d
+
d
+= − + − − ,
dN
dt
dN
dt
d DAP= − ,
where A C N ed C
E / kTd= − , B = 4πDr
0
N
a
-, C = nC
d
, N
d
, N
a
and N
DAP
is the donor, acceptor and DAP density, re-
spectively, D is the diffusion coefficient of the mobile
component, (N N )d d− + the density of donors filled with
electrons, C
d
the coefficient of electron capture by the
donor, N
C
is the density of states in the c-band, n � the
free electron density and r
0
is the largest distance between
donor and acceptor centers at which association is still
possible.
Consideration similar to that carried out for degrada-
tion reaction shows that when strong retrapping is present
and C >> A the equation E
eq
= E
d
+ E
dif
will take place.
3. Conclusions
Carrier trapping is shown to be able to influence essen-
tially on defect reaction in semiconductors. When deep
traps are present, the kinetics of defect reaction can be
controlled by thermal ionization of these traps. In this
case illumination (injection) enhanced diffusion, in par-
ticular, by the phonon-kick mechanism may be imitat-
ed. This is the case which is proved to take place in CdS
and CdSSe crystals. Defect drift in an external electric
field is proposed as an effective method for defect reac-
tion mechanism study.
N. E. Korsunskaya et al.: Electron-enhanced reactions responsible ...
4 6 SQO, 2(1), 1999
References
1. O. V. Bogdankevich, N.N. Kostin, E.M. Krasavina, I.V. Kruk-
ova, E.V. Markov, E.V. Matveenko, V.A. Teplitsky, Izv. Akad.
Nauk SSSR, Neorg. Mater. 23(10), pp. 1618-1622 (1987).
2. M. K. Sheinkman, N.E. Korsunskaya, I.V. Markevich, T.V.
Torchinskaya, The recharge-enhanced transformations of
donor-aceptor pairs and clusters in CdS // J. Phys. Chem. Sol.
43(5), pp. 475-479 (1982).
3. D. V. Lang, Recombination-enhanced Reactions in Semi-
conductors // Annu.Rev.Matt.Sci., Palo Alto, California 12,
pp. 377-400 (1972).
4. M.K. Sheinkman and L.C.Kimerling, The mechanism of elec-
tronically enhanced defect reactions in semiconductors, in
Defect Control in Semiconductors, eds. K.Sumino, Elsevier
Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland (1990).
5. J. D. Weeks, J. C. Tully, L. C. Kimerling, Theory of Recombina-
tion-enhanced Defect Reactions in Semiconductors // Phys.Rev.
B12(8), pp. 3286-3292 (1975).
6. N. E. Korsunskaya, I. V. Markevich, T. V. Torchinskaya,
M. K. Sheinkman, Photosensitivity Degradation Mechanism in
CdS:Cu Single Crystals // Phys. stat. sol. (a) 60(1), pp. 565-572
(1980).
7. N. P. Baran, B. R. Dzhymayev, N. E. Korsunskaya, I. V. Mar-
kevich, L.Yu. Khomenkova, E.P.Shulga, Investigation of EPR
spectra of shallow donors responsible for electronically enhanced
defect reactions in CdS // Fiz. Tverd. Tela 38(6), pp. 1735-1741
(1996).
8. N. S. Koparanova, A. Drangazhova, Thermal and Optical Resto-
raiton of Photoelectric Sensitivity of CdS Single Crystals after
Optical Degradation // Compt. Rendus de l�Academie Bulg.
Sci., 30(7), pp. 989-992 (1977).
9. M. K. Sheinkman, New explanation of recombination-enhanced
phenomena in semiconductors // Pisma v Jurn. Expe. i Tech. Fiz.
38(6), pp. 278-279 (1983).
10. N. E. Korsunskaya, I. V. Markevich, T. V. Torchinskaya,
M. K. Sheinkman, Investigation of defect drift in electric field in
CdS:Li crystals // Fiz. Tekn. Poluprov. 13(3), pp. 435-440 (1979).
11. N. E. Korsunskaya, I. V.Markevich, T. V.Torchinskaya,
M. K. Sheinkman, Electrodiffusion of shallow donors in CdS crys-
tals // J. Phys. p. 13(4), pp. 1275-1278 (1980).
12. V. E. Lashkarev, A. V. Lyubchenko and M. K. Sheinkman, Ner-
avnovesnye Procesy v Fotoprovodnikakh, Naukova dumka,
Kiev (1981).
|